What influences career choices among graduates of a primary care training program?

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that influence primary care residents to become generalists or specialists. DESIGN: Structured survey and interview. SETTING: A large university-based, internal medicine residency program in primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Of 92 residency graduates who completed training between 1979 and 1993, 88 (96%) participated. MAIN RESULTS: Although 82% of the participating graduates reported themselves very committed to primary care at the beginning of residency, only 68% pursued generalist careers. Factors influencing career choice that were more important to generalists than specialists included breadth of knowledge used in primary care practice (p=.04), breadth of clinical problems in practice (p=.001), and opportunity for continuity of care (p=.01). Although salary was rated “not important,” 50% of generalists and specialists advocated increased salaries for generalists as a way to increase interest in primary care. Other promoting factors included mentors, increased prestige for generalists, community-based training, lifestyle changes, and decreased paperwork. Seventy-three percent of participants felt it was easier to be a specialist than a generalist. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial minority of primary care residents pursue specialty careers. To produce more generalists, graduates recommend addressing income inequities, providing generalist role models, increasing community-based teaching, and increasing prestige for generalists.     

Perceived, actual, and desired knowledge regarding medicare billing and reimbursement

BACKGROUND: Economics and reimbursement have become a daily part of practicing physicians' lives. Yet, few internal medicine (IM) programs have offered formal curricula during residency about practice management or economics. OBJECTIVE: To determine perceived, desired, and actual knowledge of Medicare billing and reimbursement among residents compared with community-based General Internists. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional needs assessment survey of community and university-based second-year IM residents from 4 geographic regions of the United States. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three second-year IM residents completed the questionnaire. Residents rated their level of knowledge about Medicare as a 2.0 (SD=0.9) on a Likert scale (1="very low," 5="very high"). Residents agreed that Medicare reimbursement should be taught in residency with a score of 4.0 (SD=1.1; 1="strongly disagree," 5="strongly agree" SD=1.1). On the knowledge assessment portion of the questionnaire, residents scored significantly lower than a group of general IM physicians who completed the same questions (percent correct=41.8% vs 59.0%, P<.001). Residents' scores correlated with their self-assessed level of knowledge (P=.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that second year IM residents feel they have a low level of knowledge regarding outpatient Medicare billing, and have a lower test score than practicing Internists to back up their feelings. The residents also strongly agree that they do not receive enough education about Medicare reimbursement, and believe it should be a requirement in residency training.     

Factors associated with career longevity in residency-trained emergency physicians.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that residency-trained emergency physicians who left the practice of emergency medicine do not differ significantly from those who continue to practice. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using a mailed questionnaire. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred fifty-eight emergency medicine residency graduates from 1978 through 1982. METHODS: A mailed questionnaire was used to obtain data from the study population. Individuals who did not respond to the first mailing were sent a second survey six weeks later. A sample of 10% of nonrespondents was contacted by telephone and compared with respondents on five variables. Respondents were divided into physicians who continued to practice emergency medicine and those who had elected to leave the specialty. The variables used to compare the two groups included personal and professional demographics, career satisfaction, and satisfaction with training. chi 2, Fisher's exact t-test, and logistic regression were used to analyze the data with an a priori level of significance set at .05. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 539 complete responses for a response rate of 62.8%. No statistical differences between responders and nonresponders were identified. The ten-year survival rate of respondents was 84.9%. Those who left emergency medicine were less likely to be board certified in emergency medicine (P less than .001), were more likely to be board certified in another field (P = .001), were less likely to work with residents during their emergency medicine practice (P = .009), and were more likely to report an annual gross income of less than $100,000 per year (P less than .001). Emergency physicians who have left the field were less likely to report being satisfied or very satisfied with their initial choice of emergency medicine as a specialty (P = .001). There was no difference in satisfaction with the quality of emergency medicine residency training (P = .183). CONCLUSION: Career longevity of residency-trained emergency physicians has been greater than early predictions. Interactions with residents, higher income, satisfaction with training decision, and board certification in emergency medicine are variables associated with a higher retention rate.     

Quality of care of international and Canadian medical graduates in acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: International medical graduates (IMGs) make up a substantial proportion of the physician workforce and play an important role in the care of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). There are concerns that IMGs may provide inferior medical care compared with locally trained medical graduates, but that has not been established. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of linked administrative databases containing health care claims of physicians' service payments, hospital discharge abstracts, and patients' vital status. We included 127,275 AMI patients admitted between April 1, 1992, and March 31, 2000, to acute care hospitals in Ontario. We then compared the risk-adjusted mortality rates and adjusted use of secondary prevention medications and cardiac invasive procedures in patients treated by IMGs vs Canadian medical graduates. RESULTS: Of the 127,275 admitted AMI patients, 28,061 (22.0%) were treated by IMGs and 99,214 (78.0%) by Canadian medical graduates. The risk-adjusted mortality rates of IMG- and Canadian medical graduate-treated patients were not significantly different at 30 days (13.3% vs 13.4%, P = .57) and at 1 year (21.8% vs 21.9%, P = .63). Furthermore, AMI patients treated by both groups had similar adjusted likelihood of receiving secondary prevention medications at 90 days and cardiac invasive procedures at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The use of secondary prevention medications and cardiac procedures and the mortality of AMI patients were similar, regardless of the origin of medical education of the admitting physician. This information places the care provided by IMGs into perspective and supports the ability of well-selected IMGs in caring for AMI patients.     

Alumni perspectives comparing a general internal medicine program and a traditional medicine program

Objective:To evaluate a primary care internal medicine curriculum, the authors surveyed four years (1983–1986) of graduates of the primary care and traditional internal medicine residency programs at their institution concerning the graduates’ preparation. Design:Mailed survey of alumni of a residency training program. Setting:Teaching hospital alumni. Subjects/methods:Of 91 alumni of an internal medicine training program for whom addresses had been found, 82 (90%) of the residents (20 primary care and 62 traditional) rated on a five-point Likert scale 82 items for both adequacy of preparation for practice and importance of training. These items were divided into five groups: traditional medical disciplines (e.g., cardiology), allied disciplines (e.g., orthopedics), areas related to medical practice (e.g., patient education), basic skills and knowledge (e.g., history and physical), and technical procedures. Main results:Primary care residents were more likely to see themselves as primary care physicians versus subspecialists (84% versus 45%). The primary care graduates felt significantly better prepared in the allied disciplines and in areas related to medical practice (p<0.01). There was no significant difference overall in perceptions of preparation in the traditional medical disciplines, basic skills and knowledge, and procedures. The same results were obtained when the authors looked only at graduates from the two programs who spent more than 50% of their time as primary care physicians versus subspecialists. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the perceived importances of these areas to current practice. Conclusions:These results suggest that the primary care curriculum has prepared residents in areas particularly relevant to primary care practice. Additionally, these individuals feel as well prepared as do their colleagues in the traditional medical disciplines, basic skills and knowledge, and procedural skills. Received from the Division of General Internal Medicine, Brown University Program in Medicine, and the Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. Dr. Kiel is a Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Faculty Scholar in general internal medicine. Address correspondence and reprint requests to General Internal Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903.     

Impact of postgraduate medical education on recognition of stroke

Insufficient awareness persists in the general medical community regarding risk factors, warning signs, and prevention strategies for stroke. A survey of 308 internal medicine residency programs showed only 144 (46%) required neurology compared with cardiology (97%, P <0.001). Furthermore, an inverse relationship was identified between the number of medicine residents completing neurology rotations and the stroke mortality by state (r = 0.41; P = 0.001). Underrepresentation of neurology in internal medicine residency programs may contribute to stroke outcome.     

Attitudes and perceptions of internal medicine residents regarding pulmonary and critical care subspecialty training

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attitudes and perceptions of internal medicine residents regarding pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) training. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Three university hospitals. METHODS: An eight-page survey was distributed and collected between March 1, 2002, and June 30, 2002. All internal medicine or internal medicine/pediatric residents training at the three institutions were eligible for the study. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-eight residents in internal medicine from an eligible pool of 297 residents returned the survey (61% response rate). PCCM accounted for only 3.4% of the career choices. Forty-one percent of the residents seriously considered a pulmonary and/or critical care fellowship during their residency. Of these residents, 23.5% found the combination of programs the more attractive option, while 2.8% found pulmonary alone and 14.5% found critical care alone more attractive. Key factors associated with a higher resident interest in PCCM subspecialty training included more weeks in the ICU (p = 0.008), more role models in PCCM (3.02 +/- 0.78 vs 3.45 +/- 0.78, p = 0.0004), and resident observations of a greater sense of satisfaction among PCCM faculty (3.07 +/- 0.82 vs 3.33 +/- 0.82, p = 0.04) and fellows (3.05 +/- 0.69 vs 3.31 +/- 0.86, p = 0.03) [mean +/- SD]. The five most commonly cited attributes of PCCM fellowship that would attract residents to the field included intellectual stimulation (69%), opportunities to manage critically ill patients (51%), application of complex physiologic principles (45%), number of procedures performed (31%), and academically challenging rounds (29%). The five most commonly cited attributes of PCCM that would dissuade residents from the field included overly demanding responsibilities with lack of leisure time (54%), stress among faculty and fellows (45%), management responsibilities for chronically ill patients (30%), poor match of career with resident personality (24%), and treatment of pulmonary diseases (16%). CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine residents have serious reservations about PCCM as a career choice. Our survey demonstrated that a minority of US medical graduates actually would choose PCCM as a career, which suggests that efforts to expand PCCM training capacity might result in vacant fellowship slots. To promote greater interest in PCCM training, efforts are needed to improve the attractiveness of PCCM and address the negative lifestyle perceptions of residents.     

Resident expectations of morning report: a multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: Morning report, a cornerstone of inter nal medicine residency programs for many years, involves a diverse group of teachers and learners with heterogeneous learning goals. METHODS: We distributed a self-administered, cross sectional survey to internal medicine residents to clarify the objectives of the learners at morning report. We selected a convenience sample of internal medicine residents at community- and university-based programs Questions were answered in a Likert scale or multiple-choice format. RESULTS: Residents from 13 residency programs in 7 states participated. We received 356 completed surveys, which represented a 63% response rate. The house staff in our sample preferred that half of the guest attending physicians be generalists. They indicated that the primary function of morning report should be educational, and preferred to discuss the management of a few interesting cases rather than review all patients admitted the previous day. The majority of respondents (60.8%) favored a stepwise presentation of cases to simulate the chronology of receiving information. Disease process, diagnostic workup, and evaluation of tests and procedures were all considered important topics for discussion, while medical ethics and research methods were viewed as less important. Responses varied little when stratified by sex, postgraduate year, type of residency program, subspecialty fellowship plans, or location of medical school. CONCLUSIONS: Residents from a diverse group of programs expressed remarkably similar opinions about morning report. Consistent with the recently increased emphasis on ambulatory care and general internal medicine in residency training, they expressed a desire for about 50% of the guest attending physicians to be generalists. In addition, they preferred a style in which challenging cases were presented in a stepwise manner.     

Principles of intercultural medicine in an internal medicine program

Internal medicine and medicine-pediatric residents (n = 76) completed a questionnaire that measured variables including sociodemographics, family dynamics, cross-cultural exposure, and exposure to intercultural medicine principles. Questions were answered regarding perceptions of their patients and level of comfort discussing specific cultural variables. Gender, training status, and geographic background did not influence responses, but the responses of European-Americans (71%) vs. ethnic minorities and foreign medical graduates (29%) were significantly different. European-Americans were more likely to be men, less likely to have an urban background (p = .02), and their self-described socioeconomic status was uppermiddle to upper class (p = .02). European-Americans vs. all others differed in their perceptions of patients' financial support (p = .001), and reasons for doctor-patient miscommunications (p = .05). The European-Americans had significantly less exposure to friends and classmates (p = .002), and instructors (p = .0001) of ethnic origins different than their own prior to residency training. Our data support the inclusion of intercultural medicine principles in the general internal medicine curriculum.     

Medical student interest in internal medicine. Initial report of the Society of General Internal Medicine Interest Group Survey on Factors Influencing Career Choice in Internal Medicine

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors that attract students toward and push students away from a career in internal medicine. DESIGN: National survey of senior U.S. medical students using a stratified random cluster sampling of medical schools. PARTICIPANTS: The survey included 1650 U.S. senior students from 16 medical schools, of whom 1244 (76%) responded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A survey instrument was developed and pilot tested at 17 medical schools. Twenty-four percent of the respondents to the final survey chose a career in general internal medicine (9%) or subspecialty internal medicine (15%). A career in internal medicine had been "seriously considered" by 608 respondents (50%) who finally chose a career other than internal medicine (the "switchers"). Compared with other specialties, internal medicine was perceived as being more stressful to residents, more demanding of time and workload as a career and a residency, and as an easier residency to enter. Internal medicine was also seen as providing less satisfaction for residents, having lower income potential, and allowing less leisure time. For the 608 switchers, the most important influences leading to their decision to switch were the type of patient seen in internal medicine (for example, chronically ill, alcohol and drug abusing patients) as well as dissatisfaction and stress among internal medicine residents. Factor analysis showed that three factors, "intellectual challenge of internal medicine," "primary care interests," and "the medicine clerkship" attracted students toward internal medicine, whereas three others, "taking care of chronically ill patients," "level of satisfaction among internists and medical residents," and "workload and stress" pushed students away from internal medicine. Factors pushing students away from internal medicine were significantly more negative with regard to a career in general as opposed to subspecialty internal medicine (P less than 0.001). CONCLUSION: Medical students have serious reservations about internal medicine as a career choice. Perceptions about the medical residency, the patients they expect to see, and the dissatisfaction among residents and internists are foremost in their thinking. Changes to improve the attractiveness of internal medicine should address these adverse perceptions while building on the positive influences identified by the respondents.     

The content of internal medicine residency training and its relevance to the practice of medicine

Using survey items from Kern et al. (1985), 192 former residents rated their preparation in, and the importance of, three content areas of their residency training ("basic skill and knowledge areas," "allied medical disciplines," and "areas related to the practice of medicine"). Mean ratings replicated those reported by Kern et al. (r = 0.70 to 0.97, p less than 0.004). Using additional data about current practice patterns, ratings by general internists were compared with ratings by subspecialists. Both groups identified basic skill and knowledge areas as most important and felt that many areas related to practice management had been underemphasized. Most allied medical disciplines, however, were more important to generalists. Exposure to non-internal medicine areas seems important for residents considering subspecialization. However, all residents may benefit from increased emphasis on basic clinical skills and practice management. Program directors may want to address these issues, given the recent decline in applications to internal medicine programs.     

National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower: X. Internal medicine residency and fellowship training: 1985 update

The number of medical school graduates entering internal medicine residency training was at an all-time high in 1984-85. Although the number of first-year residents who were foreign-trained physicians did not differ greatly from the 1983-84 census, the number of first-year residents who were U.S. medical school graduates was much higher than the previous year largely because the number of graduates from U.S. medical schools increased substantially in 1984. The number of internal medicine fellowship programs and the number of fellows in 1984-85 were also at an all-time high. Foreign-trained physicians represent 22% of those in residency training and 20% of those in fellowship training. Of every 100 who completed residency training, 61 went on to a first year of subspecialty fellowship training, a number up slightly from the previous year. The increasing numbers of residents and fellows being trained in internal medicine, combined with the preference for subspecialization and the substantial proportion of foreign-trained physicians being trained, are discussed against the background of pending legislation to reduce federal assistance for graduate medical education.     

Practice patterns and the adequacy of residency training in consultation medicine

Objective: To describe consultation practice patterns of graduates of an internal medicine residency program and to determine whether they consider themselves to be adequately trained to practice in the area of internal medicine consultations. Design: The authors surveyed graduates of the internal medicine residency program at the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine from 1980 to 1989. Respondents described their practice types and the mechanics of consultations they currently perform, as well as the adequacy of their training in and frequency of encountering 74 clinical problems in the area of internal medicine consultation. Topics were categorized as Group I: excessive training; Group II: adequate training, frequently encountered; Group III: adequate training, infrequently encountered; Group IV: inadequate training, frequently encountered; and Group V: inadequate training, infrequently encountered. Setting: University teaching hospital. Participants: Of 214 graduates, 91 returned surveys adequate for analysis. Results: Internists prefer verbal communication with their colleagues and seeing surgical patients in the office prior to admission. Residents perceive that they have been excessively trained in preoperative evaluations of the asymptomatic and chronically ill adult and in several postoperative complications. Topics seen frequently in clinical practice but inadequately taught include: issues in convalescence and rehabilitation from surgical procedures, use of psychotropic medications, and management of eating disorders. Conclusions: To prepare residents for practice, program directors in consultation medicine might consider incorporating outpatient preoperative evaluation assessments, encouraging a liaison between surgeons and internists, and modeling verbal communication among colleagues. Consideration should be given for more didactic training for Group IV topics. Received from the Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine/Geriatrics, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, Lajolla, California.     

National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower: XVII. Changes in the characteristics of internal medicine residents and their training programs, 1988-1989

The National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower (NaSimm) has been surveying program directors of internal medicine about their programs and residents for 13 years. The 1988-1989 survey results, when compared with the results for 1987-1988, show an increase in both the number of residency positions offered in internal medicine and the number of residents in internal medicine programs. Although the proportion of graduates from U.S. medical schools who choose internal medicine is not changing (34%), the proportion of U.S. medical school graduates who continue training in internal medicine after their first year is decreasing. The composition of the residents in internal medicine by medical school graduated is also changing. Almost 25% of the first-year residents (R1s) in internal medicine are now graduates of foreign medical schools (FMGs) compared with 14% in 1976. The proportion of first-year female residents in internal medicine has increased to 30%, whereas the proportion of both first-year blacks and Hispanics has remained constant at 5% each. In nearly 25% (109 of 440) of the residency programs, more than 50% of the R1s are FMGs. Hispanics, Asians, and blacks were found to be over-represented in the programs training larger proportions of FMGs. This over-representation is attributable, in part, to the fact that Hispanics and Asians may be FMGs. Training issues of concern to program directors continue to be the provision of ambulatory and primary care experiences and the scheduling of nights on call. The survey results show that many residency program directors have reported a reduction in the number of nights on call and an increase in the amount of time residents spend in ambulatory training.     

Problematic resident-patient relationships

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to identify the characteristics of a problematic doctor-patient relationship from the perspective of primary care patients who are cared for by medical residents and to determine whether patients' perception of the relationship is a function of their demographic, clinical, or social attributes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: An adult primary care practice in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-one patients whose primary care physicians were senior internal medicine residents. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients completed a questionnaire addressing several aspects of their doctor-patient relationship, the general health perception item on the SF-12, and items on social support from the Duke Social Support and Stress Scale. By design of the study, approximately half of the patients had been identified by their physicians as being in problematic relationships (n = 74) and half as being in satisfying relationships (n = 77). Among patients in relationships described as satisfying by their resident, 10% viewed the relationship as problematic. Of the patients involved in relationships described as problematic by the resident, 23% viewed their relationship as problematic (P = .03). Patients who rated the relationship as problematic were much more likely to also report low social support compared to patients involved in relationships described as satisfying (76% vs 16%; P < .001). Compared to residents involved in relationships described as satisfying by their patients, residents in problematic relationships were more likely to be described as being less accessible and less capable of handling medical complaints (P < . 001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients were more likely to describe the doctor-patient relationship as problematic if they felt that the resident was less accessible or less capable of handling medical complaints, or if they had low self-perceived social support.     

Contributions of general internal medicine teaching units

OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe general internal medicine teaching units and their educational activities. DESIGN: A cross-sectional mailed survey of heads of general internal medicine teaching units affiliated with U.S. internal medicine training programs who responded between December 1996 and December 1997. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Responses were received from 249 (61%) of 409 eligible programs. Responding and nonresponding programs were similar in terms of university affiliation, geographic region, and size of residency program. Fifty percent of faculty received no funding from teaching units, 37% received full-time (50% or more time), and 13% received part-time (under 50% time) funding from units. Only 23% of faculty were primarily located at universities or medical schools. The majority of faculty were classified as clinicians (15% or less time spent in teaching) or clinician-educators (more than 15% time spent in teaching), and few were clinician-researchers (30% or more time spent in research). Thirty-six percent of faculty were internal medicine subspecialists. All units were involved in training internal medicine residents and medical students, and 21% trained fellows of various types. Half of the units had teaching clinics located in underserved areas, and one fourth had teaching clinics serving more than 50% managed care patients. Heads of teaching units reported that 54% of recent graduating residents chose careers in general internal medicine. CONCLUSIONS: General internal medicine teaching units surveyed contributed substantial faculty effort, much of it unfunded and located off-campus, to training medical students, residents, and fellows. A majority of their graduating residents chose generalist careers. Presented at the national meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, April 1998, and the Bureau of Health Professions, June 1998. This work was supported by the Division of Medicine, Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Md, grant 103HR960470P000-000; and the Society of General Internal Medicine.     

Race and gender differences in general internists’ annual incomes

BACKGROUND: Specialty, work effort, and female gender have been shown to be associated with physicians' annual incomes; however, racial differences in physician incomes have not been examined. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of race and gender on General Internists' annual incomes after controlling for work effort, provider characteristics, and practice characteristics. DESIGN: Retrospective survey-weighted analysis of survey data. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand seven hundred and forty-eight actively practicing General Internists who responded to the American Medical Association's annual survey of physicians between 1992 and 2001. MEASUREMENTS: Work effort, provider and practice characteristics, and adjusted annual incomes for white male, black male, white female, and black female General Internists. RESULTS: Compared with white males, white females completed 22% fewer patient visits and worked 12.5% fewer hours, while black males and females reported completing 17% and 2.8% more visits and worked 15% and 5.5% more annual hours, respectively. After adjustment for work effort, provider characteristics, and practice characteristics, black males' mean annual income was 188,831 dollars or 7,193 dollars (4%) lower than that for white males (95% CI: -31,054 dollars, 16,669 dollars; P=.6); white females' was 159,415 dollars or 36,609 dollars (19%) lower (95% CI: -25,585 dollars, -47,633 dollars; P<.001); and black females' was 139,572 dollars or 56,452 dollars (29%) lower (95% CI: -93,383 dollars, -19,520 dollars; P=.003). CONCLUSIONS: During the 1990s, both black race and female gender were associated with lower annual incomes among General Internists. Differences for females were substantial. These findings warrant further exploration.     

Hospitalists as teachers

OBJECTIVE: To compare evaluations of teaching effectiveness among hospitalist, general medicine, and subspecialist attendings on general medicine wards. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: A large, inner-city, public teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 423 medical students and house staff evaluating 63 attending physicians. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured teaching effectiveness with the McGill Clinical Tutor Evaluation (CTE), a validated 25-item survey, and reviewed additional written comments. The response rate was 81%. On a 150-point composite measure, hospitalists' mean score (134.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), 130.2 to 138.8]) exceeded that of subspecialists (126.3 [95% CI, 120.4 to 132.1]), P =.03. General medicine attendings (135.0 [95% CI, 131.2 to 138.8]) were also rated higher than subspecialists, P =.01. Physicians who graduated from medical school in the 1990s received higher scores (136.0 [95% CI, 133.0 to 139.1]) than did more distant graduates (129.1 [95% CI, 125.1 to 133.1]), P =.006. These trends persisted after adjusting for covariates, but only year of graduation remained statistically significant, P =.05. Qualitative analysis of written remarks revealed that trainees valued faculty who were enthusiastic teachers, practiced evidence-based medicine, were involved in patient care, and developed a good rapport with patients and other team members. These characteristics were most often noted for hospitalist and general medicine attendings. CONCLUSIONS: On general medicine wards, medical students and residents considered hospitalists and general medicine attendings to be more effective teachers than subspecialists. This effect may be related to the preferred faculty members exhibiting specific characteristics and behaviors highly valued by trainees, such as enthusiasm for teaching and use of evidence-based medicine.     

Resident research and scholarly activity in internal medicine residency training programs

OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe how internal medicine residency programs fulfill the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) scholarly activity training requirement including the current context of resident scholarly work, and 2) to compare findings between university and nonuniversity programs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mailed survey. SETTING: ACGME-accredited internal medicine residency programs. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine residency program directors. MEASUREMENTS: Data were collected on 1) interpretation of the scholarly activity requirement, 2) support for resident scholarship, 3) scholarly activities of residents, 4) attitudes toward resident research, and 5) program characteristics. University and nonuniversity programs were compared. MAIN RESULTS: The response rate was 78%. Most residents completed a topic review with presentation (median, 100%) to fulfill the requirement. Residents at nonuniversity programs were more likely to complete case reports (median, 40% vs 25%; P=.04) and present at local or regional meetings (median, 25% vs 20%; P=.01), and were just as likely to conduct hypothesis-driven research (median, 20% vs 20%; P=.75) and present nationally (median, 10% vs 5%; P=.10) as residents at university programs. Nonuniversity programs were more likely to report lack of faculty mentors (61% vs 31%; P<.001) and resident interest (55% vs 40%; P=.01) as major barriers to resident scholarship. Programs support resident scholarship through research curricula (47%), funding (46%), and protected time (32%). CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine residents complete a variety of projects to fulfill the scholarly activity requirement. Nonuniversity programs are doing as much as university programs in meeting the requirement and supporting resident scholarship despite reporting significant barriers.