Placement of endosteal implants combined with chin bone onlay graft for dental reconstruction in patients with grafted alveolar clefts

Endosteal implants were inserted into grafted alveoli after particulate cancellous bone and marrow grafting in seven patients with cleft lip or palate in conjunction with simultaneous chin bone onlay grafting. In these patients, the alveolar bone height of the bony bridge was insufficient when evaluated by both computed tomographic and periapical radiographic images. The age at first implant surgery ranged from 14 to 28 years. Although four of the seven patients had an uneventful course, three had wound dehiscence, and in all but one of them the exposed chin bone underwent partial or total necrosis. Ultimately all seven implants integrated into the bone, and the alveolar bone height was increased in all but one patient. The results indicate that chin bone onlay grafting with simultaneous implant insertion is useful in patients with cleft lip or palate with insufficient alveolar bone height.     

Reconstruction of the anterior maxilla with platelet gel,autogenous bone,and titanium mesh: a case report

Background: Reconstruction of defects in the anterior part of the maxilla to enable implant placement is a challenging treatment. Recent studies have suggested that the use of autogenous platelet gel may contribute to improved healing of bone grafts. Purpose: A case is presented in which particulated autogenous bone, platelet gel, and a titanium mesh were used for alveolar bone reconstruction of the anterior maxilla prior to implant placement. Materials and Methods: Corticocancellous bone from the iliac crest was mixed with a preparation of autogenous platelet gel (platelet‐rich plasma, thrombin, and calcium chloride) and placed against a titanium mesh fixed to the bone of the palate in a patient with severe resorption of the anterior maxilla. After 4.5 months of healing the mesh was removed and titanium implants were placed. A prolonged healing period of 8 months was allowed before healing abutments were placed and a fixed dental bridge was fabricated. Results: Healing was uneventful, and the anterior maxilla had increased in height and width during the initial healing. All implants became integrated and have been supporting a fixed dental bridge for over 3 years with no dramatic dimensional changes of the graft. Conclusions: This case demonstrates that particulated autogenous bone and platelet gel may be used for reconstruction of the anterior maxilla. Autogenous growth factors in the gel possibly contributed to the positive outcome. Controlled clinical studies are needed to evaluate the effect of using platelet‐rich plasma.     

Augmentation in two stages of atrophic alveolar bone prior to dental rehabilitation: a case report

AIM: The aim of this report is to describe a significantly deficient case of alveolar bone that was managed by alveolar bone augmentation using a technique of distraction osteogensis and onlay bone grafting prior to dental implant placement. BACKGROUND: Injury to the teeth and alveolar ridge of the maxillary anterior region can cause a severe alveolar ridge deficiency resulting in ridge atrophy and maxillary retrognathism. The loss of these teeth and alveolar bone together with fibrotic scar formation can result in adverse changes of the interarch space, occlusal plane, arch relationship, and arch form which complicates rehabilitation and can compromise the esthetic outcome. While implant dentistry has become a new paradigm in oral reconstruction and replacement of missing teeth, ideal implant positioning can be compromised by inadequate alveolar bone in terms of bone height, width, and quality of the bone itself. Correction of osseous deficiencies with ridge augmentation allows ideal implant placement and creates a more natural soft tissue profile which influences crown anatomy and esthetics. REPORT: A 20-year-old female presented with a complaint of poor esthetics resulting from oral injuries incurred in a traffic accident six years previously. In addition to a mandibular parasymphyseal fracture, five maxillary anterior teeth and the most of the alveolar ridge were lost. Clinical examination revealed severe loss of bone in the maxillary anterior region, an absence of a labial sulcus, loss of upper lip support, and a slight over eruption of the mandibular anterior teeth. In preparation for dental implants a distraction osteogenesis surgical procedure was done to lengthen the height of the alveolar ridge. After a three-month healing period, the width of the residual ridge was found to be insufficient for implant placement. To correct this deficiency, a bone graft of a cortiocancellous block was harvested from the chin and fixed to the labial aspect of the ridge. To facilitate revascularization, small perforations were made in the cortical bone of the alveolar ridge at the recipient site before cancellous bone retrieved from the donor site was gently placed between the bone block and the ridge. The patient was then appropriately medicated and healing was uneventful. After three months, the width of the residual ridge was assessed to be adequate for endosseous implants. SUMMARY: The clinical result reported here has shown several procedures may be necessary for the rehabilitation of a trauma patient. Distraction osteogenesis per se may not always satisfactorily improve the anatomical alveolar anatomy but it has advantages over other methods of augmentation. It can improve the height and also expand the soft tissue for further bone grafting. Augmentation of the alveolar bone with an onlay bone graft often provides the desired gain of bone, allows for the ideal placement of dental implants, and improves any discrepancy between the upper and lower arches.     

Demineralized perforated bone implants in craniofacial surgery.

Between July 1990 and September 1991, demineralized perforated allogeneic bone implants (Pacific Coast Tissue Bank, Los Angeles, CA) were placed in 72 patients. Because many patients received more than one implant, a total of 248 implants were used in 80 procedures. The technology of processing demineralized bone implants is described in detail. All patients were operated on by one surgeon (K.E.S.) at the Humana Craniofacial Institute in Dallas, Texas. Forty-one patients had craniofacial deformities, 16 had secondary deformities following cleft lip and palate repair, 8 had bony defects following removal of tumors, and 10 had various skeletal deformities following trauma. Of the 72 patients, 6 had two surgical procedures during which additional implants were inserted. Implants placed in the cranial vault and the maxillary complex, including alveolar grafts, were inlay grafts, whereas implants placed in the orbital, nasal, paranasal, temporal, and malar areas were onlay grafts used for contouring, augmentation, or both. Complications were limited to delayed wound healing in 6 patients. According to our observations, demineralized perforated bone implants represent an encouraging alternative to autogenous bone grafting. Further clinical and experimental studies are necessary to obtain more information about this material.     

种植床自体骨移植在上颌窦闭合式提升中的临床应用

目的评价种植床自体骨植骨行上颌窦闭合式提升后同期植入种植体的临床效果。方法对上颌后牙缺失后剩余牙槽骨高度在6-10mm患者,用中空圆柱钻制备种植床,收集种植床自体骨,行上颌窦闭合式挤压提升后,植入自体骨和ITI种植体,6-9个月后行上部结构修复。结果17例患者共植入25颗种植体,平均提升上颌窦底高度为3.4mm(2-4mm),修复后追踪观察6-36个月,l颗种植体修复6个月后松动拔除。其余24颗种植体平均负载21个月,种植体稳定,未见明显骨吸收,所有病例均无上颌窦并发症。结论严格掌握适应证,种植床自体骨植骨上颌窦闭合式提升同期植入种植体,创伤小、操作较简单,无须开辟第2手术区。     

Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical outcome of horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts covered with an organic bovine bone mineral (ABBM) and a bioabsorbable collagen membrane. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 42 patients with severe horizontal bone atrophy, a staged approach was chosen for implant placement following horizontal ridge augmentation. A block graft was harvested from the symphysis or retromolar area, and secured to the recipient site with fixation screws. The width of the ridge was measured before and after horizontal ridge augmentation. The block graft was subsequently covered with ABBM and a collagen membrane. Following a tension-free primary wound closure and a mean healing period of 5.8 months, the sites were re-entered, and the crest width was re-assessed prior to implant placement. RESULTS: Fifty-eight sites were augmented, including 41 sites located in the anterior maxilla. The mean initial crest width measured 3.06 mm. At re-entry, the mean width of the ridge was 7.66 mm, with a calculated mean gain of horizontal bone thickness of 4.6 mm (range 2-7 mm). Only minor surface resorption of 0.36 mm was observed from augmentation to re-entry. CONCLUSIONS: The presented technique of ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts with ABBM filler and collagen membrane coverage demonstrated successful horizontal ridge augmentation with high predictability. The surgical method has been further simplified by using a resorbable membrane. The hydrophilic membrane was easy to apply, and did not cause wound infection in the rare instance of membrane exposure.     

��������������ֲ���˹��γɵ��������ǰ����ֲǰ�����չ������е�Ӧ���о�����1�����棩

萎缩的牙槽嵴对于种植牙而言是一个不利的因素,在植入种植体之前牙槽骨嵴增量手术能够使骨的体积增加。在上颌前牙区,牙槽嵴增量不仅有利于后期种植体的植入而且可以获得更好美学效果。本文详述用钛网结合异体骨移植和人骨形成蛋白治疗上前牙区部分牙缺失部位的颊舌向骨缺损。通过这种方法可获得一定的骨增量,8个月后植入种植体,在植入种植体后4个月行二期手术和临时修复,4个月后进行永久修复,追踪时间为2年。     

上颌前牙区牙槽嵴骨劈开增量同期种植术的临床研究

目的 :评价骨劈开增宽上颌前牙槽嵴 ,同期植入种植体的临床效果。方法 :15例患者 ,缺失上前牙1～4颗 ,有充足的牙槽嵴高度 (>13mm) ,但牙槽嵴骨厚度仅2～3mm ,采用骨劈开术 ,形成唇侧骨瓣。在唇侧骨瓣与腭侧骨板间植入3.4～4.5mm直径的Frialit-2种植体共25枚,骨板间隙充填Bio -Oss骨粉 ,覆盖Bio -Gide胶原膜或纯钛膜 ,无张力下缝合黏骨膜瓣。术后第10天和6个月时拍X线根尖周片观察种植体骨结合状况 ,并于术后6个月时行Ⅱ期手术 ,翻开软组织瓣 ,检查骨增量效果和种植体稳固性 ,测量牙槽嵴骨的宽度和拆除钛膜。结果 :1枚种植体术后1个月脱落 ,其余种植体稳固 ,且完全被骨质包埋 ,X线根尖周片证实种植体骨结合良好 ,牙槽嵴宽度增加达3～5mm ,平均增宽4.4mm。Ⅱ期手术时种植体成活率96 %。24枚种植体完成金属烤瓷修复 ,经2年的追踪观察,无一种植体松动或脱落。结论 :当前牙区牙槽嵴骨厚度2～3mm时 ,采用骨劈开术增宽牙槽嵴 ,使植种植体获得同期植入是一种行之有效的方法。     

The use of fresh frozen allogeneic bone for maxillary and mandibular reconstruction.

The use of fresh frozen bone (FFB) alone, or in combination with autogenous bone (AB), for bony augmentation of the maxilla and mandible in preparation for dental reconstruction with endosseous implants has been studied. Ten patients received FFB +/- AB for augmentation of a severely atrophic mandible (n = 6) or for reconstruction of a jaw defect secondary to trauma or tumor resection (n = 4). Average follow-up was 26.3 +/- 5.4 months. At the time of implant placement, the bone grafts were found to be firm in consistency, well incorporated, and well vascularized in all 10 patients. Twenty-nine endosseous implants were placed an average of 8.3 +/- 3.1 months following bone grafting. One implant failed and was replaced, and one implant remains buried as a nonfunctional unit. All patients have been restored prosthetically by means of 28 of the 29 implants. This preliminary study indicates that FFB may be used alone or in combination with autogenous bone for augmentation or reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla and mandible. The resultant ridge is adequate to support loaded endosseous implants. A potential disadvantage is the minimal risk of disease transmission.     

Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants: results after 12-124 months

Abstract: Insertion of endosseous implants in the atrophic maxilla is often complicated because of lack of supporting bone. Augmentation of the floor of the maxillary sinus with autogenous bone graft has been proven to be a reliable treatment modality, at least in the short term. The long‐term clinical and radiographic outcome with regard to the grafts, the implants and satisfaction of the patients with their implant‐supported overdenture was studied in 99 patients. The sinus floor was augmented with bone grafts derived from the iliac crest (83 subjects, 162 sinuses, 353 implants), the mandibular symphysis (14, 18, 37), or the maxillary tuberosity (2, 2, 2). Before implant installation, the width and height of the alveolar crest were increased in a first stage procedure in 74 patients, while in the other 25 patients augmentation and implant installation could be performed simultaneously (width and height of the alveolar crest >5 mm). Perforation of the sinus membrane occurred in 47 cases, which did not predispose to the development of sinusitis. Loss of bone particles and sequestration were observed in one (diabetic) patient only, in whom a dehiscence of the oral mucosa occurred. A second augmentation procedure was successful in this patient. Symptoms of transient sinusitis were observed in 3 patients. These symptoms were successfully treated with decongestants and antibiotics. 2 other patients developed a purulent sinusitis which resolved after a nasal antrostomy. In all cases, the bone volume was sufficient for implant insertion. 32 of 392 inserted Brånemark implants (8.2%) were lost during the follow‐up. After the healing period of the bone grafts, no sinus pathology was observed. The patients received implant‐supported overdentures (72 patients) or fixed bridges (27 patients). Overall, the patients were very satisfied with the prosthetic construction. We conclude that bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous bone for the insertion of implants is a reliable treatment modality with good long‐term results.     

Vertical guided bone regeneration with bioabsorbable barriers

BACKGROUND: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a very useful surgical technique to increase limited alveolar bone for implant placement. The use of non-resorbable barriers is well established; however, bioabsorbable collagen membranes may simplify the surgical technique and make it more predictable. METHODS: Vertical ridge augmentation was performed on 11 patients at the time of implant placement. The part of the implant out of bone was covered with autogenous bone/graft, and a slow-resorption collagen membrane was placed on top. Gingival tissues were closed with horizontal mattress and interrupted sutures. Second-stage surgery was performed 4 to 6 months later, and healing abutments were placed. The length of the implant out of bone was determined at stage 1 and stage 2 surgeries on a periapical x-ray 1 year after implant load. Histology was obtained from one of the cases at second-stage surgery. RESULTS: Measurements revealed that the mean implant out of bone was 3.5 mm at stage 1 and 0.5 mm at stage 2. Mean bone gain was 3 mm, which represented 83% of the exposed implant at stage 1. One year after loading, implants showed a mean marginal bone loss of 1.4 mm. Minimal complications were detected, and only one case failed. Histology from one successful case showed new trabecular bone with large cellular marrow spaces in the regenerated area. CONCLUSION: Slow-resorption collagen membranes have the potential to promote vertical ridge augmentation when used with autogenous bone at the time of implant placement.     

Tissue-engineered bone for lateral alveolar ridge augmentation: a case report

Bone matrix derived from mandibular periosteal cells and cultivated by tissue engineering on a polymer fleece has recently been used for sinus floor elevation and augmentation. This case report focuses on clinical and histologic results after lateral ridge augmentation of a localized non-space maintaining defect in the right posterior area of the mandible using tissue-engineered bone. Implant supported prosthetic rehabilitation of a partially edentulous 32-year-old woman was planned involving a fixed partial denture. Preoperative investigations revealed a transversely reduced alveolar ridge width on the right side of the posterior mandible. Lateral augmentation was performed using tissue-engineered bone obtained by autogenous periosteum cells from the same area. Six months after augmentation 2 implants were placed and a bone biopsy was obtained from the augmented area. Transverse ridge dimensions were found to be enhanced. Histologic examination of the biopsy revealed dense lamellar bone. Wound healing was uneventful after all surgical interventions. This case report demonstrates the successful clinical application of tissue-engineered bone for lateral augmentation of the transversely reduced alveolar ridge. The results suggest that periosteum-derived tissue-engineered bone can be used to create a sufficient implant site not only for the sinus floor elevation and augmentation procedure for vertical bone enhancement but also for lateral augmentation.     

Vertical alveolar ridge augmentation by means of a titanium mesh and autogenous bone grafts

The aim of this study is to evaluate a surgical protocol for vertical ridge augmentation in the maxilla and mandible using autogenous onlay bone graft associated with a titanium mesh. A group of 18 partially edentulous patients, presenting the need for vertical bone augmentation of at least 4 mm, were treated before implant placement. During the first surgery, an autogenous bone graft was harvested from either the mandibular ramus or the mental symphysis and secured by means of titanium screws. Particulate bone was added and a titanium micro-mesh was used to stabilize and protect the graft. After a mean interval of 4.6 months, meshes and screws were removed and 37 endosseous implants were successfully placed. The desired bone gain was reached in all patients. Mean vertical bone augmentation obtained was 4.8 mm (range 4-7 mm). No major complications were recorded at recipient or donor sites. Abutment connection was carried out 2-3 months after implant placement. No implant was lost. Clinical parameters and probing depth, after prosthetic reconstruction, demonstrated the presence of a healthy peri-implant mucosa. The preliminary results suggest that, by using the presented technique, patients can be successfully rehabilitated by means of implant-supported prosthesis 6-7 months after the first surgery, even in case of severely atrophied maxilla.     

Dental rehabilitation using endosseous implants and orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate: report of two cases

We describe the use of endosseous implants in the autogenous particulate cancellous bone and marrow grafted alveoli after orthognathic surgery for dental rehabilitation of patients with cleft lip and palate. This procedure has been applied to two patients and produced good results functionally and aesthetically. The results are encouraging and indicate that implant placement after orthognathic surgery is useful for patients both with congenital missing teeth and retrognathic maxillae.     

Bone augmentation and autogenous transplantation of premolar to the site of the fissure in a cleft palate patient

This article presents a case report of autogenous tooth transplantation to the site of the fissure, in addition to bone augmentation with graft of autogenous bone harvested from the iliac crest, performed in a cleft palate patient, who had insufficient bone volume. A non‐syndromic 10‐year‐old girl, with a unilateral cleft lip and palate, incisal transforamen fissures, agenesis of the maxillary left central incisor and both maxillary lateral incisors, was treated with autogenous bone graft in the cleft area. The orthodontic treatment plan was to replace the missing lateral incisors with the maxillary canines and to extract the mandibular first premolars. One of the mandibular premolars was extracted from its site with 2/3 of its root formation completed and transplanted to the maxillary left central incisor area. After orthodontic treatment, the anatomic crowns were characterized with composite resin. Autogenous tooth transplantation can be performed in the area of the fissure in young cleft palate patients, by performing bone graft augmentation before transplantation of the tooth, to gain sufficient recipient alveolar bone volume. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory for the success of this clinical procedure, especially in cleft palate patients.     

Clinical radiographic,and histologic evaluation of maxillary bone reconstruction by using a titanium mesh and autogenous iliac graft: a case report

The current clinical report describes the use of titanium mesh for maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation. Autogenous bone graft was harvested from the iliac crest and was loaded on a titanium mesh that was left in the patient's maxilla for 7 months before it was removed. Twelve months after the bone grafting procedure the patient received 10 implants on the maxilla, and a biopsy was taken from the augmented ridge. CT scan examination was performed before and after the maxillary ridge augmentation. Clinical evaluation revealed successful integration of the graft. The radiographic analysis demonstrated that a 10-mm vertical ridge augmentation had been achieved. Histologic evaluation revealed remnants of the autogenous bone graft still present, whereas the grafted area had a reduced remodeling activity. The clinical report demonstrated the potential of the titanium mesh to achieve extensive alveolar ridge augmentation, whereas the augmented ridge may possess an inferior capability forbone remodeling.     

A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants

The aim of the present study was to assess long-term changes in sinus-graft height after maxillary sinus floor augmentation and simultaneous placement of implants. A total of 191 patients who underwent maxillary sinus floor augmentation were radiographically followed for up to about 10 years. A 2 : 1 mixture of autogenous bone and bovine xenograft (Bio-Oss) was used as the graft material. Sinus-graft height was measured using 294 panoramic images immediately after augmentation and up to 108 months subsequently. Changes in sinus-graft height were calculated with respect to implant length and original sinus height. Patients were divided into three groups based on the height of the grafted sinus floor relative to the implant apex: Group I, in which the grafted sinus floor was above the implant apex; Group II, in which the implant apex was level with the grafted sinus floor; and Group III, in which the grafted sinus floor was below the implant apex. After augmentation, the grafted sinus floor was consistently located above the implant apex. After 2-3 years, the grafted sinus floor was level with or slightly below the implant apex. This relationship was maintained over the long term. Sinus-graft height decreased significantly and approached original sinus height. The proportion of patients classified as belonging to Group III reached a maximum from year 3 onwards. The clinical survival rate of implants was 94.2%. All implant losses occurred within 3 years after augmentation. We conclude that progressive sinus pneumatization occurs after augmentation with a 2 : 1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture, and long-term stability of sinus-graft height represents an important factor for implant success.     

GBR技术应用于上前牙种植骨缺损的临床研究

目的：评估引导骨再生技术（GBR）在上前牙不同类型骨缺损种植修复中的效果。方法：对35例上前牙牙槽骨缺损种植的患者采用GBR技术进行骨增量,其中29例种植体周围骨缺损患者仅采用GBR技术,在植体植入骨床后,同期植入Bio～oss人工骨粉,表面盖Bio～gide可吸收性胶原膜;6例牙槽骨缺损患者采用移植自体块状骨联合Bio～oss人工骨粉,盖Bio～gide可吸收性胶原膜,5～6个月后行Ⅱ期种植体植入术。结果：所有患者在植体植入术后6～12个月临床观察种植体与骨结合良好,软组织形态与周围组织一致,行冠或桥修复,修复后12个月随诊复查无种植体失败。结论：引导骨再生技术皆能有效地对上前牙不同类型骨缺损进行骨增量,符合美学种植要求。     

The use of titanium mesh in conjunction with autogenous bone graft and inorganic bovine bone mineral (bio-oss) for localized alveolar ridge augmentation: a human study

This study evaluated the effects of using a titanium mesh for localized alveolar ridge augmentation. Seven consecutively treated human subjects participated in the study. Clinical, radiographic, laboratory, and histologic/histomorphometric analysis revealed the efficacy of using the titanium mesh in conjunction with intraorally harvested autogenous bone graft and inorganic bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss). Radiographic measurements detected that a 2.86-mm vertical and 3.71-mm buccolabial ridge augmentation was achieved, while histomorphometry demonstrated that 36.4% of the grafted area consisted of bone. Laboratory measurements revealed 15.08% resorption of the graft for the first 6 months, which appeared to consolidate after placement of the implants. Exposure of the mesh did not appear to compromise the result.     

Bone grafting of cleft lip and palate patients for placement of endosseous implants.

OBJECTIVE: Fixation of a prosthesis or single tooth replacement using osseointegrated implants has the potential to overcome functional and psychological inconveniences that many patients experience from such appliances. However, the dimensions of the recipient site are relatively often inadequate for implant placement. This study assessed grafting of this site with autogenous bone as a solution for the latter problem. METHODS: Ten cleft lip and palate patients had bone grafts; six had iliac crest grafts to the maxillary sinus floor (31 implants), and four had chin bone grafts to the local defect in the anterior maxilla (six implants). Implants were inserted during the grafting procedure (one patient) or after 3 months (nine patients). RESULTS: No inflammation of the bone grafts or the maxillary sinus occurred. One implant was lost during the healing phase. Four single tooth restorations, one fixed bridge, and five implant-supported overdentures were made. During the follow-up, which was 47 months (range, 28 to 65 months) in the anterior maxilla group and 56 months (range, 28 to 68 months) in the posterior maxilla group, no loss of implants was observed, and all prosthetic appliances functioned well. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that bone grafting followed by placement of dental implants can serve as a reliable alternative for conventional prosthetic rehabilitation of cleft patients.