Peripheral artery disease and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac rhythm disturbance and leads to morbidity and mortality. Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with atherosclerotic risk factors and always classified as a vascular disease and deemed to be a bad complication of AF. In patients with AF, the risk and prognostic value of PAD have not been estimated comprehensively.HypothesisPAD is associated with all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and other outcomes in patients with AF.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for prospective studies published before April 2021 that provided outcomes data on PAD in confirmed patients with AF. Heterogeneity was estimated using the I ² statistic. The fixed‐effects model was used for low to moderate heterogeneity studies, and the random‐effects model was used for high heterogeneity studies.ResultsEight prospective studies (Newcastle‐Ottawa score range, 7–8) with 39 654 patients were enrolled. We found a significant association between PAD and all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25–1.62; p < .001), CV mortality (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.32–2.05; p < .001) and MACE (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.38–2.22; p < .001) in patients with AF. No significant relationship was found in major bleeding (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.95–1.57; p = 0.118), myocardial infarction (MI) (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.17–3.67; p = .038), and stroke (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.87–1.50, p = 0.351).ConclusionsPAD is associated with an increased risk of all‐cause mortality, CV mortality, and MACE in patients with AF. However, no significant association was found with major bleeding, MI, and stroke.     

Comparison of prognosis and outcomes of catheter ablation versus drug therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease: A prospective propensity‐score matched cohort study

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) frequently coexist.HypothesisTo investigate the prognosis of catheter ablation versus drug therapy in patients with AF and SCAD.MethodsIn total, 25 512 patients with AF in the Chinese AF Registry between 2011 and 2019 were screened for SCAD. 815 patients with AF and SCAD underwent catheter ablation therapy were matched with patients by drug therapy in a 1:1 ratio. Primary end point was composite of thromboembolism, coronary events, major bleeding, and all‐cause death. The secondary endpoints were each component of the primary endpoint and AF recurrence.ResultsOver a median follow‐up of 45 ± 23 months, the patients in the catheter ablation group had a higher AF recurrence‐free rate (53.50% vs. 18.41%, p < .01). In multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference between the strategy of catheter ablation and drug therapy in primary composite end point (adjusted HR 074, 95%CI 0.54–1.002, p = .0519). However, catheter ablation was associated with fewer all‐cause death independently (adjusted HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.22–0.59, p < .01). In subgroup analysis, catheter ablation was an independent risk factor for all‐cause death in the high‐stroke risk group (adjusted HR 0.39, 95%CI 0.23–0.64, p < .01), not in the low‐medium risk group (adjusted HR 0.17, 95%CI 0.01–2.04, p = .17).ConclusionsIn the patients with AF and SCAD, catheter ablation was not independently associated with the primary composite endpoint compared with drug therapy. However, catheter ablation was an independent protective factor of all‐cause death     

Outcome of alcohol septal ablation in mildly symptomatic patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: A comparison with medical therapy

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was primarily to determine efficacy after alcohol septal ablation (ASA) in mildly symptomatic patients (NYHA class II) with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), as compared to medical therapy.MethodsThis retrospective study included 163 mildly symptomatic patients with HOCM evaluated in Beijing Anzhen Hospital between March 2001 and August 2019, consisting of the medical group (n = 105) and the ASA group (n = 58). All‐cause mortality and HCM‐related death were mainly observed.ResultsFollow‐up was completed in 161 patients and the median follow‐up was 6.0 years. Compared to medically treated patients, patients post‐ASA had comparable survival free of all‐cause mortality (98.3% and 95.1% vs. 93.0% and 83.1% at 5 and 10 years, respectively; p = 0.374). Survival free of HCM‐related death was also similar between ASA and medical groups (98.3% and 95.1% vs. 94.3% and 86.2% at 5 and 10 years, respectively; p = 0.608). However, compared to medical therapy, ASA had advantages on the improvement of NYHA class (1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 2.1 ± 0.5, p = .000) and lower occurrence of new‐onset atrial fibrillation (AF) (7.8% vs. 20.4%, p = .048). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that resting LVOT gradient at the last clinical check‐up was an independent predictor of all‐cause mortality (HR = 1.021, 95%CI 1.002–1.040, p = .027).ConclusionThis registry suggests that mildly symptomatic patients with HOCM treated with ASA have comparable survival to that of medically treated patients, with the improvement of NYHA class and lower occurrence of new‐onset AF. All‐cause mortality is independently associated with resting LVOT gradient at the last clinical check‐up.     

Biatrial volume ratio predicts low voltage areas in atrial fibrillation

BackgroundLeft atrial volume (LAV) and low voltage areas (LVAs) are acknowledged markers for worse rhythm outcome after ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Some studies reported the importance of increased right atrial volume (RAV) as a predictor for arrhythmia recurrences in AF patients.ObjectiveTo investigate association between the LAV/RAV ratio and LVAs presence.MethodsPatients undergoing first AF ablation were included. LVAs were assessed peri‐procedurally using high‐density 3D maps and defined as <0.5 mV. All patients underwent pre‐procedural cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. LAV (biplane) and RAV (monoplane 4‐chamber) were assessed prior to ablation, and the LAV/RAV ratio was calculated.ResultsThe study population included 189 patients (age mean 63 ± 10 years, 33% women, 57% persistent AF, 22% LVAs). There were 149 (79%) patients with LAV > RAV. In univariable analysis LAV > RAV was associated with LVAs (OR 6.803, 95%CI 1.395–26.514, p = .016). The association remained robust in multivariable model after adjustment for persistent AF, CHA₂DS₂‐VASc score, and heart rate (OR 5.981, 95%CI 1.256–28.484, p = .025). Using receiver operator curve analysis, LAV > RAV (AUC 0.668, 95%CI 0.585–0.751, p = .001) was significant predictor for LVAs. In multivariable analysis, after adjustment for age, persistent AF, and renal function, RAV≥LAV was threefold higher in males (OR 3.040, 95%CI 1.050–8.802, p = .04).ConclusionsLAV > RAV is useful for the prediction of electro‐anatomical substrate in AF. LAV > RAV was associated with LVAs presence, while male sex remained associated with RAV≥LAV and less LVAs.     

Type of atrial fibrillation and outcomes in patients without oral anticoagulants

BackgroundThe effect of type of atrial fibrillation (AF) on adverse outcomes in Chinese patients without oral anticoagulants (OAC) was controversial.HypothesisThe type of AF associated with adverse outcomes in Chinese patients without OAC.MethodsA total of 1358 AF patients without OAC from a multicenter, prospective, observational study was included for analysis. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were utilized. Net reclassification improvement analysis was performed for the assessment of risk prediction models.ResultsThere were 896(66%) patients enrolled with non‐paroxysmal AF (NPAF) and 462(34%) with paroxysmal AF (PAF). The median age was 70.9 ± 12.6 years, and 682 patients (50.2%) were female. During 1 year of follow‐up, 215(16.4%) patients died, and 107 (8.1%) patients experienced thromboembolic events. Compared with the PAF group, NPAF group had a notably higher incidence of all‐cause mortality (20.2% vs. 9.4%, p < .001), thromboembolism (10.5% vs. 3.8%, p < .001). After multivariable adjustment, NPAF was a strong predictor of thromboembolism (HR 2.594, 95%CI 1.534–4.386; p < .001), all‐cause death (HR 1.648, 95%CI 1.153–2.355; p = .006). Net reclassification improvement analysis indicated that the addition of NPAF to the CHA₂DS₂‐VASc score allowed an improvement of 0.37 in risk prediction for thromboembolic events (95% CI 0.21–0.53; p < .001).ConclusionsIn Chinese AF patients who were not on OAC, NPAF was an independent predictor of thromboembolism and mortality. The addition of NPAF to the CHA₂DS₂‐VASc score allowed an improvement in the accuracy of the prediction of thromboembolic events.     

Effect of electrical cardioversion on 1‐year outcomes in patients with early recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence is common in the 3‐month blanking‐period after catheter ablation, during which electrical cardioversion (ECV) is usually performed to restore sinus rhythm. Whether ECV can affect the clinical outcome of post‐ablation AF patients is inconsistent, however. We aimed to explore the 1‐year effect of ECV on AF recurrence and rehospitalization in patients experienced recurrence within 3‐month after AF catheter ablation.MethodsPatients who experienced recurrence within 3‐month after AF catheter ablation procedure were enrolled from the China Atrial Fibrillation Registry (China‐AF). A 1:3 Propensity score matching (PSM) method was applying to adjust the confounders between patients who had been treated by ECV or not. Logistic regression models were conducted to evaluate the association of ECV with 1‐year AF recurrence and rehospitalization.ResultsIn this study, 2961 patients experienced AF recurrence within 3‐month after the procedure, and 282 of them underwent successful ECV, 2155 patients did not undergo ECV. One‐year AF recurrence rates were 56.4% in ECV group versus 65.4% in non‐ECV group (p = .003), and were 55.9% versus 65.9%, respectively, after PSM (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49–0.88, p = .005). However, the difference of 1‐year rehospitalization rates between two groups were not statistically significant before (ECV group: 23.7% vs. non‐ECV group: 22.3%, p = .595) and after PSM (ECV group: 24.4% vs. non‐ECV group: 21.6%, adjusted OR1.14; 95% CI 0.81–1.62, p = .451).ConclusionsSuccessful ECV was associated with lower rate of one‐year recurrence in patients with early recurrent AF after catheter ablation.     

Defibrillation threshold of internal cardioversion prior to ablation predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence

BackgroundMany studies have reported the predictors of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after persistent AF (peAF) ablation. However, the correlation between the atrial defibrillation threshold (DFT) for internal cardioversion (IC) and AF recurrence rate is unknown. Here we investigated the relationship between the DFT prior to catheter ablation for peAF and AF recurrence.HypothesisDFT prior to ablation was the predictive factor for AF recurrence after peAF ablation.MethodsFrom June 2016 to May 2019, we enrolled 82 consecutive patients (mean age, 65.0 ± 12.4 years), including 45 with peAF and 37 with long‐standing peAF, at Hamamatsu Medical Center. To assess the DFT, we performed IC with gradually increasing energy prior to radiofrequency application.ResultsForty‐nine and 33 patients showed DFT values less than or equal to 10 J (group A) and greater than 10 J or unsuccessful defibrillation (group B). During the mean follow‐up duration of 20.5 ± 13.1 months, patients in group B showed significantly higher AF recurrence rates than those in group A after the ablation procedure (p = .017). Multivariate analysis revealed that DFT was the only predictive factor for AF recurrence (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00–1.13, p = .047).ConclusionsThe DFT for IC was among the strongest prognostic factors in the peAF ablation procedure.     

Meta‐analysis of cryoballoon ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs as initial therapy for symptomatic atrial fibrillation

BackgroundThe optimal first‐line approach for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. We compared the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in the initial management of symptomatic AF.HypothesisCBA is superior to AAD as initial therapy for symptomatic AF.MethodsWe searched the EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CBA with AAD as first‐line treatment for AF from the date of database establishment until March 18, 2021. The risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as a measure of treatment effect.ResultsThree RCTs that enrolled 724 patients in total were included in this meta‐analysis. Majority of the patients were relatively young and had paroxysmal AF. CBA was associated with a significant reduction in the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia compared with AAD therapy, with low heterogeneity (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.49–0.71; p < .00001; I ²  = 0%). There was a significant difference in the rate of symptomatic atrial arrhythmia recurrence (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29–0.65; p < .0001; I ²  = 0%); however, the rate of serious adverse events was similar between the two treatment groups (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.71–1.97, p = .53; I ² = 0%). Transient phrenic nerve palsy occurred in four patients after the CBA procedure.ConclusionThe current meta‐analysis suggests that CBA is more effective than AAD as initial therapy in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF. Serious iatrogenic adverse events are uncommon in CBAs.     

Central retinal artery occlusion as a first sign of atrial fibrillation: A 3‐year retrospective single‐center analysis

BackgroundCentral retinal artery occlusion ((C)RAO) is known to be associated with stroke and/or atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, patients often present at the ophthalmologist initially and it is unknown how many of these receive an adequate cardiological/neurological work‐up (CWU/NWU), including a 24 h‐Holter‐ECG.HypothesisHypothesis of this study was that patients with (C)RAO do not undergo CWU on regular basis and that new‐onset AF is more often detected in patients with CWU.Methods and resultsWe performed a retrospective analysis of n = 292 consecutive patients who presented at an ophthalmology department with the diagnosis of (C)RAO during a 3‐year period. After excluding patients with known AF, meeting exclusion criteria, inability to comply with the protocol, missed land phoneline, or death during follow‐up a total of 174 patients were enrolled; mean follow‐up was 20 ± 12 months. The CHA₂DS₂‐VASc score of the cohort was 5.3 ± 1.4. Our analysis revealed that only 50.6% of patients received a CWU including a single Holter‐ECG after the index‐event. In 12.6% cases new‐onset AF was diagnosed, while the rate was higher in patients with CWU compared to patients without CWU (18.2 vs. 7.0%; p = 0.26). Evaluation of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy showed that only 66% of patients with AF were treated according to guidelines.ConclusionOnly half of patients with (C)RAO underwent CWU. Despite minimal monitoring, rate of new diagnosed AF was high. Our results confirm that (C)RAO identifies a high‐risk population for AF. These results illustrate the importance to implement standardized CWU in (C)RAO patients presenting at the ophthalmologist.     

Rhythm outcomes after aortic valve surgery: Treatment and evolution of new‐onset atrial fibrillation

BackgroundThe impact of new‐onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after aortic valve (AV) surgery on mid‐ and long‐term outcomes is under debate. Here, we sought to follow up heart rhythms after AV surgery, and to evaluate the mid‐term prognosis and effectiveness of treatment for patients with new‐onset AF.MethodsThis single‐center cohort study included 978 consecutive patients (median age, 59 years; male, 68.5%) who underwent surgical AV procedures between 2017 and 2018. All patients with postoperative new‐onset AF were treated with Class III antiarrhythmic drugs with or without electrical cardioversion (rhythm control). Status of survival, stroke, and rhythm outcomes were collected and compared between patients with and without new‐onset AF.ResultsNew‐onset AF was detected in 256 (26.2%) patients. For them, postoperative survival was comparable with those without new‐onset AF (1‐year: 96.1% vs. 99.3%; adjusted P = .30), but rate of stroke was significantly higher (1‐year: 4.0% vs. 2.2%; adjusted P = .020). With rhythm control management, the 3‐month and 1‐year rates of paroxysmal or persistent AF between patients with and without new‐onset AF were 5.1% versus 1.3% and 7.5% versus 2.1%, respectively (both P < .001). Multivariate models showed that advanced age, impaired ejection fraction, new‐onset AF and discontinuation of beta‐blockers were predictors of AF at 1 year.ConclusionsIn most cases, new‐onset AF after AV surgery could be effectively converted and suppressed by rhythm control therapy. Nevertheless, new‐onset AF predisposed patients to higher risks of stroke and AF within 1 year, for whom prophylactic procedures and continuous beta‐blockers could be beneficial.     

Longitudinal association between cognitive depressive symptoms and D‐dimer levels in patients following acute myocardial infarction

BackgroundA prothrombotic tendency could partially explain the poor prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease and depression. We hypothesized that cognitive depressive symptoms are positively associated with the coagulation activation marker D‐dimer throughout the first year after myocardial infarction (MI).MethodsPatients with acute MI (mean age 60 years, 85% men) were investigated at hospital admission (n = 190), 3 months (n = 154) and 12 months (n = 106). Random linear mixed regression models were used to evaluate the relation between cognitive depressive symptoms, assessed with the Beck depression inventory (BDI), and changes in plasma D‐dimer levels. Demographics, cardiac disease severity, medical comorbidity, depression history, medication, health behaviors, and stress hormones were considered for analyses.ResultsThe prevalence of clinical depressive symptoms (13‐item BDI score ≥ 6) was 13.2% at admission and stable across time. Both continuous (p < .05) and categorical (p < .010) cognitive depressive symptoms were related to higher D‐dimer levels over time, independent of covariates. Indicating clinical relevance, D‐dimer was 73 ng/ml higher in patients with a BDI score ≥ 6 versus those with a score < 6. There was a cognitive depressive symptom‐by‐cortisol interaction (p < .05) with a positive association between cognitive depressive symptoms and D‐dimer when cortisol levels were high (p < .010), but not when cortisol levels were low (p > .05). Fluctuations (up and down) of cognitive depressive symptoms and D‐dimer from one investigation to the next showed also significant associations (p < .05).ConclusionsCognitive depressive symptoms were independently associated with hypercoagulability in patients up to 1 year after MI. Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis could potentially modify this effect.     

Impact of P‐wave indices in prediction of atrial fibrillation—Insight from loop recorder analysis

BackgroundSeveral P‐wave indices are associated with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, previous studies have been limited in their ability to reliably diagnose episodes of AF. Implantable loop recorders allow long‐term, continuous, and therefore more reliable detection of AF.HypothesisThe aim of this study is to identify and evaluate ECG parameters for predicting AF by analyzing patients with loop recorders.MethodsThis study included 366 patients (mean age 62 ± 16 years, mean LVEF 61 ± 6%, 175 women) without AF who underwent loop recorder implantation between 2010–2020. Patients were followed up on a 3 monthly outpatient interval.ResultsDuring a follow‐up of 627 ± 409 days, 75 patients (20%) reached the primary study end point (first detection of AF). Independent predictors of AF were as follows: age ≥68 years (hazard risk [HR], 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.668–4.235; p < .001), P‐wave amplitude in II <0.1 mV (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.298–3.441; p = .003), P‐wave terminal force in V₁ ≤ −4000 µV × ms (HR, 5.3; 95% CI, 3.249–8.636; p < .001, and advanced interatrial block (HR, 5.01; 95% CI, 2.638–9.528; p < .001). Our risk stratification model based on these independent predictors separated patients into 4 groups with high (70%), intermediate high (41%), intermediate low (18%), and low (4%) rates of AF.ConclusionsOur study indicated that P‐wave indices are suitable for predicting AF episodes. Furthermore, it is possible to stratify patients into risk groups for AF using simple ECG parameters, which is particularly important for patients with cryptogenic stroke.     

Predictors of rhythm outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy in atrial fibrillation patients: When should we use an atrial lead?

BackgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is widely used in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients and could impact rhythm stability.HypothesisWe aimed to identify predictors of sinus rhythm (SR) stability or AF progression in a real‐word cohort of CRT‐AF patients.MethodsFrom 330 consecutive implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator implantations due to ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy, 65 (20%) patients with AF history (paroxysmal, n = 32) underwent a CRT implantation with an atrial electrode and were regularly followed every 4–6 months. Rhythm restoration was attempted for most AF patients based on symptoms, biventricular pacing (BP), and lack of thrombi.ResultsAfter 33 months, 18 (28%) patients progressed to permanent mode switch (MS≥99%) and 20 (31%) patients had stable SR (MS < 1%). Logistic regression showed that history of persistent AF (OR: 8.01, 95%CI: 2.0–31.7, p = .003) is associated with higher risk of permanent MS. In persistent AF patients, a bigger left atrium (OR: 1.2 per mm, 95%CI: 1.03–1.4, p = .025) and older age (OR: 1.15 per life‐year, 95%CI: 1.01–1.3, p = .032) were predictors of future permanent MS. Paroxysmal AF at implantation (OR: 5.96, 95%CI: 1.6–21.9, p = .007) and increased BP (OR: 1.4 per 1%, 95%CI: 1.05–1.89, p = .02) were associated with stable SR. In persistent AF patients, stable SR correlated with higher BP (98 ± 2 vs. 92 ± 8%, p < .001).ConclusionIn patients with AF undergoing CRT implantation, persistent AF, LA dilatation and advanced age relate to future permanent MS (AF), whereas high BP promotes SR stability. These findings could facilitate the management of CRT‐AF patients and guide therapy in order to maximize its effect on rhythm.     

Effect of non‐recommended doses versus recommended doses of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients: A meta‐analysis

BackgroundSeveral observational studies have shown that the inappropriate dosing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) that does not conform to recommendations is becoming a widespread phenomenon. Therefore, we performed a meta‐analysis and systematic review to assess the effect of non‐recommended doses versus recommended doses of DOACs on the effectiveness and safety outcomes among AF patients.MethodsThe PubMed and Ovid databases were systematically searched to identify the relevant studies until December 2020. The effect estimates were hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), which were pooled using a fixed‐effects model (I² ≤ 50%) or a random‐effects model (I² > 50%).ResultsA total of 11 studies were included in this meta‐analysis. Compared with recommended dosing of DOACs, non‐recommended low dosing of DOACs was associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE, HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.12–1.49) and all‐cause death (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.15–1.62), but not the ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and major bleeding. Compared with recommended dosing of DOACs, non‐recommended high dosing of DOACs was associated with increased risks of SSE (HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.01–2.04), major bleeding (HR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.48–2.68), and all‐cause death(HR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.02–1.87).ConclusionCompared with recommended dosing of DOACs, non‐recommended low dosing of DOACs was associated with increased risks of SSE and all‐cause death. Further study should confirm the findings of non‐recommended high dosing versus recommended dosing of DOACs.     

The prognostic impact of left ventricular thrombus resolution after acute coronary syndrome and risk modulation via antithrombotic treatment strategies

BackgroundLeft ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a rare but dreaded complication during the acute phase of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, profound data on long‐term outcome and associated antithrombotic treatment strategies of this highly vulnerable patient population are scarce in current literature.MethodsPatients presenting with ACS were screened for presence of LVT and subsequently included within a prospective clinical registry. All‐cause mortality and the composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and thromboembolic events were defined as primary and secondary endpoint.ResultsWithin 43 patients presenting with LVT, thrombus resolution during patient follow‐up was observed in 27 individuals (62.8%). Patients that reached a resolution of LVT experienced lower incidence rates of death (−23.9%; p = .022), MACE (−37.8%; p = .005), and thromboembolic events (−35.2%; p = .008). Even after adjustment for clinical variables, thrombus resolution showed an independent inverse association with all‐cause death with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.14 (95% CI: 0.03–0.75; p = .021) and as well with MACE with a HR of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.07–0.68; p = .008) and thromboembolic events with a HR of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.06–0.75; p = .015). Triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) with ticagrelor/prasugrel showed a strong and independent association with thrombus resolution with an adjusted HR of 3.25 (95% CI: 1.22–8.68; p = .019) compared to other strategies.ConclusionThe presented data indicate a poor outcome of ACS patients experiencing LVT. In terms of a personalized risk stratification, thrombus resolution has a strong protective impact on both all‐cause death and MACE with the potential to tailor treatment decisions—including an intensified antithrombotic treatment approach—in this patient population.     

Anxiety and prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction: A meta‐analysis

Although anxiety is highly prevalent after myocardial infarction (MI), but the association between anxiety and MI is not well established. This study aimed to provide an updated and comprehensive evaluation of the association between anxiety and short‐term and long‐term prognoses in patients with MI. Anxiety is associated with poor short‐term and long‐term prognoses in patients with MI. We performed a systematic search in the PubMed and Cochrane databases (January 2000–October 2020). The study endpoints were complications, all‐cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and/or major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Pooled data were synthesized using Stata SE12.0 and expressed as risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included 9373 patients with MI from 16 published studies. Pooled analyses indicated a correlation between high anxiety and poor clinical outcomes (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.13–1.26, p < .001), poor short‐term complications (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09–1.38, p = .001), and poor long‐term prognosis (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.13–1.44, p < .001). Anxiety was also specifically associated with long‐term mortality (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01–1.33, p = .033) and long‐term MACEs (RR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.26–1.90, p < .001). This study provided strong evidence that increased anxiety was associated with poor prognosis in patients with MI. Further analysis revealed that MI patients with anxiety had a 23% increased risk of short‐term complications and a 27% increased risk of adverse long‐term prognosis compared to those without anxiety.     

Predictors and 3‐year outcomes of compromised left circumflex coronary artery after left main crossover stenting

BackgroundThere are few predictors of decreased fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) after left main (LM) crossover stenting.ObjectivesWe aimed to determine the predictors for low FFR at LCx and possible treatment strategies for compromised LCx, together with their long‐term outcomes.MethodsAltogether, 563 patients who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to our hospital from February 2015 to November 2020 with significant distal LM bifurcation lesions. They underwent single‐stent crossover percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) under intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance with further LCx intervention based on the measured FFR.ResultsThe patients showed significant angiographic LCx ostial affection post‐LM stenting, but only 116 (20.6%) patients had FFR < 0.8. The three‐year composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates were comparable between the high and low FFR groups (16.8% vs. 15.5; p = 0.744). In a multivariate analysis, low FFR at the LCx was associated with post‐stenting minimal luminal area (MLA) of LCx (odds ratio [OR]: 0.032, p < .001), post‐stenting LCx plaque burden (OR: 1.166, p < .001), poststenting LM MLA (OR: 0.821, p = .038), and prestenting LCx MLA (OR: 0.371, p = .044). In the low FFR group, those with compromised LCx managed with drug‐eluting balloon had the lowest three‐year MACE rate (8.1%), as compared to either those undergoing kissing balloon inflation (KBI) (17.5%) or stenting (20.5%) (p = 0.299).ConclusionUnnecessary LCx interventions can be avoided with FFR‐guided LCx intervention. Poststenting MLA and plaque burden of the LCx, and main vessel stent length are poststenting predictors of low FFR.     

Proenkephalin and the risk of new‐onset heart failure: data from prevention of renal and vascular end‐stage disease

BackgroundEnkephalins of the opioid system exert several cardiorenal effects. Proenkephalin (PENK), a stable surrogate, is associated with heart failure (HF) development after myocardial infarction and worse cardiorenal function and prognosis in patients with HF. The association between plasma PENK concentrations and new‐onset HF in the general population remains to be established.HypothesisWe hypothesized that plasma PENK concentrations are associated with new‐onset HF in the general population.MethodsWe included 6677 participants from the prevention of renal and vascular end‐stage disease study and investigated determinants of PENK concentrations and their association with new‐onset HF (both reduced [HFrEF] and preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF]).ResultsMedian PENK concentrations were 52.7 (45.1–61.9) pmol/L. Higher PENK concentrations were associated with poorer renal function and higher NT‐proBNP concentrations. The main determinants of higher PENK concentrations were lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), lower urinary creatinine excretion, and lower body mass index (all p < .001). After a median 8.3 (7.8–8.8) years follow‐up, 221 participants developed HF; 127 HFrEF and 94 HFpEF. PENK concentrations were higher in subjects who developed HF compared with those who did not, 56.2 (45.2–67.6) versus 52.7 (45.1–61.6) pmol/L, respectively (p = .003). In competing‐risk analyses, higher PENK concentrations were associated with higher risk of new‐onset HF (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.09[1.47–2.97], p < .001), including both HFrEF (HR = 2.31[1.48–3.61], p < .001) and HFpEF (HR = 1.74[1.02–2.96], p = .042). These associations were, however, lost after adjustment for eGFR.ConclusionsIn the general population, higher PENK concentrations were associated with lower eGFR and higher NT‐proBNP concentrations. Higher PENK concentrations were not independently associated with new‐onset HFrEF and HFpEF and mainly confounded by eGFR.     

Acute cardiovascular hospitalizations and illness severity before and during the COVID‐19 pandemic

BackgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) hospitalizations declined worldwide during the COVID‐19 pandemic. It is unclear how shelter‐in‐place orders affected acute CVD hospitalizations, illness severity, and outcomes.HypothesisCOVID‐19 pandemic was associated with reduced acute CVD hospitalizations (heart failure [HF], acute coronary syndrome [ACS], and stroke [CVA]), and worse HF illness severity.MethodsWe compared acute CVD hospitalizations at Duke University Health System before and after North Carolina''s shelter‐in‐place order (January 1–March 29 vs. March 30–August 31), and used parallel comparison cohorts from 2019. We explored illness severity among admitted HF patients using ADHERE (“high risk”: >2 points) and GWTG‐HF (“>10%”: >57 points) in‐hospital mortality risk scores, as well as echocardiography‐derived parameters.ResultsComparing hospitalizations during January 1–March 29 (N = 1618) vs. March 30–August 31 (N = 2501) in 2020, mean daily CVD hospitalizations decreased (18.2 vs. 16.1 per day, p = .0036), with decreased length of stay (8.4 vs. 7.5 days, p = .0081) and no change in in‐hospital mortality (4.7 vs. 5.3%, p = .41). HF hospitalizations decreased (9.0 vs. 7.7 per day, p = .0019), with higher ADHERE (“high risk”: 2.5 vs. 4.5%; p = .030), but unchanged GWTG‐HF (“>10%”: 5.3 vs. 4.6%; p = .45), risk groups. Mean LVEF was lower (39.0 vs. 37.2%, p = .034), with higher mean LV mass (262.4 vs. 276.6 g, p = .014).ConclusionsCVD hospitalizations, HF illness severity, and echocardiography measures did not change between admission periods in 2019. Evaluating short‐term data, the COVID‐19 shelter‐in‐place order was associated with reductions in acute CVD hospitalizations, particularly HF, with no significant increase in in‐hospital mortality and only minor differences in HF illness severity.