Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary?

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine frequency of invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at excisional biopsy in women with atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) at percutaneous core-needle biopsy (CNB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of results in 6,081 consecutive patients who underwent CNB at two institutions revealed that in 35 (0.58%), LCIS (n = 15) or ALH (n = 20) was the pathologic finding with highest risk. Patient age range was 41-84 years (mean, 59 years). Of 35 patients, 26 (74%) underwent excisional biopsy and nine (26%) underwent mammographic follow-up for longer than 2 years. Lesions with a pathologic upgrade were noted when invasive cancer or DCIS occurred at the CNB site. CNB results in patients with a diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) (75 of 6,081 [1.2%]) were reviewed; these patients underwent subsequent excisional biopsy. Statistical comparison of frequency of upgrading of lesions in patients with a diagnosis of LCIS or ALH at CNB and in those with a diagnosis of ADH at CNB was performed (Pearson chi(2) test). RESULTS: In six (17%) of 35 (95% CI: 4.7%, 29.6%) patients, lesions were upgraded to DCIS (n = 4) or invasive cancer (n = 2). In 15 patients with LCIS diagnosed at CNB, lesions in four (27%) were upgraded to either DCIS or invasive cancer. In 20 patients with ALH diagnosed at CNB, lesions were upgraded to DCIS in two (10%). Lesions in nine patients who underwent mammographic follow-up were stable. No mammographic or technical findings distinguished patients with upgraded lesions from those whose lesions were not upgraded. In 12 (16%) of 75 (95% CI: 7.7%, 24.3%) patients with ADH, lesions were upgraded. Difference between the upgrade rate in patients with LCIS or ALH and that in those with ADH was not significant (P =.88). CONCLUSION: Lesions in 17% of patients with LCIS or ALH at CNB were upgraded to invasive cancer or DCIS; this rate was similar to the upgrade rate in patients with ADH. Excisional biopsy is supported when LCIS, ALH, or ADH is diagnosed at CNB.     

Lobular neoplasia detected at MRI-guided biopsy: imaging findings and outcomes

ObjectiveTo review MRI findings of pure lobular neoplasia (LN) on MRI guided biopsy, evaluate surgical and clinical outcomes, and assess imaging findings predictive of upgrade to malignancy.MethodsHIPAA compliant, IRB-approved retrospective review of our MRI-guided breast biopsy database from October 2008–January 2015. Biopsies yielding atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ were included in the analysis; all biopsy slides were reviewed by a dedicated breast pathologist. Imaging indications, MRI findings, and histopathology were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed using the two-tailed Fisher exact-test and the t-test, and 95% CIs were determined. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsDatabase search yielded 943 biopsies in 785 patients of which 65/943 (6.9%) reported LN as the highest risk pathologic lesion. Of 65 cases, 32 were found to have LN as the dominant finding on pathology and constituted the study population. All 32 findings were mammographically and sonographically occult. Three of 32 (9.3%) cases of lobular neoplasia were upgraded to malignancy, all LCIS (one pleomorphic and two classical). The most common MRI finding was focal, heterogenous non-mass enhancement with low T2 signal. No clinical features or imaging findings were predictive of upgrade to malignancy.ConclusionIncidence of pure lobular neoplasia on MRI guided biopsy is low, with comparatively low incidence of upgrade to malignancy. No imaging or clinical features are predictive of upgrade on surgical excision, therefore, prudent radiologic-pathologic correlation is necessary.     

Underestimation rate of lobular intraepithelial neoplasia in vacuum-assisted breast biopsy

Objectives

To evaluate the underestimation rate and clinical relevance of lobular neoplasia in vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB).

Methods

A total of 161 cases of LN were retrieved from 6,435 VABB. The histological diagnosis was ALH (atypical lobular hyperplasia) in 80 patients, LCIS (lobular carcinoma in situ) in 69 patients and PLCIS (pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ) in 12 patients. Seventy-six patients were operated on within 2 years after VABB and 85 were clinically and radiologically monitored. The mean follow-up was 5.2 years, and the prevalence of malignancy was evaluated in the group of 85 patients.

Results

The clinico-pathological characteristics significantly favouring surgery were larger lesions, occurrence of a residual lesion following VABB and histological LCIS and PLCIS subtypes. The VABB underestimation rate as compared to surgery was 7.1 % for ALH, 12 % for LCIS and 50 % for PLCIS. Overall, 11 of the 148 patients included in this survival analysis developed an ipsilateral tumour.

Conclusion

Although obtained retrospectively in a relatively small series of patients, our data suggest that only patients with a diagnosis of PLCIS in VABB should be treated with surgery, whereas patients with ALH and LCIS could be monitored by clinical and radiological examinations.

Key Points

? The treatment of ALH and LCIS in VABB is still debated ? Some authors favour radical treatment and others a more conservative approach ? Only patients with PLCIS in VABB should be treated by surgery     

Atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ at core-needle breast biopsy

PURPOSE: To review outcomes of lesions diagnosed at core-needle breast biopsy as atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results from 1,400 consecutive core-needle breast biopsies were reviewed. Twenty-five (1.8%) biopsy samples with the diagnosis of lobular neoplasia (15 with ALH and 10 with LCIS) adjacent to or in a targeted benign lesion were found. Lesions were excised (n = 15) or followed up (n = 10) at least 22 months. RESULTS: Of the 15 lesions with ALH, 13 (87%) were adjacent to (n = 12) or associated with (n = 1) microcalcifications, and two (13%) were in masses. Six lesions with residual calcifications were excised. One lesion was diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and five were benign (residual ALH was seen in four). One excised mass showed residual ALH. Six lesions were gone at follow-up, one cluster of microcalcifications was decreased in size, and one fibroadenoma with ALH was stable. Of the 10 lesions with LCIS, seven (70%) were adjacent to (n = 6) or associated with (n = 1) microcalcifications, and three (30%) were in or adjacent to masses. Five lesions with LCIS and residual microcalcifications were excised. Three yielded atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH); one, residual LCIS; and one, ALH. Three masses with LCIS were excised. One showed residual LCIS; one, a papilloma with adjacent LCIS; and one, a fibroadenoma with LCIS in it. One cluster of microcalcifications was gone at follow-up, and one was stable. CONCLUSION: After a diagnosis of lobular neoplasia at core biopsy, residual microcalcifications are viewed in the context of a patient at higher risk of cancer. Of 11 lesions with residual microcalcifications, three (27%) were ADH and one (9%) was DCIS.     

Lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy-what is the clinical significance?

AIM: To retrospectively review the surgical histological findings in all cases where lobular carcinoma in situ(LCIS) was identified on percutaneous core biopsy (CB) performed as part of the Cambridge and Huntingdon breast screening programme.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all the core biopsies performed in our department for screen detected abnormalities over a 5-year period between 1 April 1994 and 31 March 1999. All patients where LCIS was identified on CB were reviewed. As the significance of LCIS on CB was unclear all went on to surgical excision. We reviewed the clinical and imaging findings, biopsy technique and subsequent surgical histology of each patient.RESULTS: During the study period 60 769 women were invited for screening, of whom 47 975 attended (attendance rate = 79%). Of these, 2330 (4.9%) were recalled for assessment and 749 (1.6%) underwent CB. A malignant diagnosis was obtained in 311 (42%), 211 invasive and 100 in situ lesions. LCIS was identified on CB in 13 (2%). LCIS was the only lesion identified in seven cases. All seven cases subsequently underwent surgical excision. Surgical histology revealed a single case of LCIS and invasive lobular carcinoma. There were two cases of LCIS and DCIS one with a probable focus of invasive ductal carcinoma. In one case LCIS was identified in association with a radial scar. In three of the seven cases LCIS was the only abnormality on both CB and surgical biopsy.CONCLUSION: Our series shows that isolated LCIS on CB following mammographic screening is an infrequent finding, and it may be associated with either an invasive cancer or DCIS. It is therefore advisable that when LCIS is identified on CB, surgical excision of the mammographic abnormality should be performed. Decisions on management should be undertaken in a multidisciplinary setting taking into account clinical and imaging findings.     

Carcinoma within fibroadenomas: mammographic features

The mammographic features of carcinoma originating within a fibroadenoma in 24 patients were studied by means of retrospective review of pathologic slides. Histologic examination showed that the lesions were lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) (seven patients), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (13 patients), synchronous LCIS and invasive lobular carcinoma (one patient), and synchronous LCIS and DCIS (three patients). In all patients the mammographic manifestation was a mass 1.0 cm or greater in diameter; 14 masses were 1-2 cm in diameter, and the remainder were more than 2 cm in diameter. Features that were considered suspect included large size, indistinct margins, and clustered microcalcifications. In three patients, microcalcifications within the mass raised suspicion of malignancy. At histologic examination these microcalcifications were associated with the intraductal carcinoma harbored in the fibroadenoma in only one of these patients. Fibroadenomas that harbor carcinoma may be indistinguishable from common benign fibroadenomas, but their occurrence is rare. In this study, a single patient had invasive lobular carcinoma; all the other lesions were in situ lesions.     

Proliferative high-risk lesions of the breast: contribution and limits of US-guided core biopsy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively correlate high-risk proliferative breast lesions (radial scar, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ and papillary lesions) diagnosed on core biopsy with the definitive histopathological diagnosis obtained after surgical excision or with the follow-up, in order to assess the role of core biopsy in such lesions. To discuss the management of the patient after a core biopsy diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated 74 out of 1776 core biopsies consecutively performed on 67 patients. The histopathologic findings were as follows: 11 radial scars (RS), 3 atypical lobular hyperplasias (ALH), 3 lobular carcinomas in situ (LCIS), 57 benign papillary lesions. All patients underwent bilateral mammography, whole-breast ultrasound with a linear-array broadband transducer, and core biopsy with a 14 Gauge needle and a mean number of samples of 5 (range 4-7). Sixty-two of 67 patients, for a total of 69/74 lesions, underwent surgical biopsy despite benign histopathologic findings, mostly because of highly suspicious imaging for malignancy (BIRADS 4-5), whereas 5 patients refused surgery and have been followed up for a least 18 months and are still being followed up (2 with RS, 1 with ADH and 2 with papillary lesions). RESULTS: Among the core biopsied lesions with a diagnosis of RS (n = 11) pathology revealed one ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (this case was characterized by granular microcalcifications on mammography and by a mass with irregular margins on ultrasound). Also in the group of ADH (n = 3) pathology revealed one DCIS (lesion not visible on mammography but depicted as a suspicious mass on US). In the group of LCIS (n = 3) pathologists found an invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Among the benign papillary lesions (n = 57) histopathologic analysis of the surgical specimen revealed 7 malignant lesions (4 papillary carcinomas and 3 DCIS), whose mammographic and ultrasound findings were indistinguishable from benign lesions. Altogether there were 10 false negative results (underestimation) out of 74 core biopsies with a diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesions. CONCLUSION: The high rate of histological underestimation after core biopsy (10/74) (13.5%) demands a very careful management of patents with a core biopsy diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesions, especially in the case of RS, lobular neoplasia and papillary lesions. However, the high imaging suspicion for malignancy prompts surgery. It is possible to assume that, when there is a low imaging suspicion for malignancy, when enough tissue has been sampled for pathology and no atypia is found within the lesions, surgery is not mandatory but a very careful follow-up is recommended. We must underline that there is no agreement regarding the quantity of tissue to sample. Vacuum-assisted biopsy may lead to better results, although there is as yet no proof that it can actually replace surgery in this group of lesions, since it seems only to reduce but not abolish the histological underestimation.     

Evaluation of the stereotactic 8G vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the histologic evaluation of suspicious mammography findings (BI-RADS IV)

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of the new 8G stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (ST-driver, Mammotome; Ethicon Endosurgery) in the histologic evaluation of BI-RADS IV microcalcifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with 61 mammographic BI-RADS IV microcalcifications underwent stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVAB). The new 8G system was mounted on the ST driver, which was formerly used only with the hand-held version under sonographic guidance. The evaluation criteria for each biopsy were minimally invasive and operative histologies, the time needed for biopsy, the amount of bleeding, number of rotations and specimen, the degree of resection, and the complications. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of 61 biopsies were technically successful because > or = 50% were resected (29 x 100%, 8 x 90%, 5 x 80%, 6 x 70%, 3 x 50%, 3 x 0%). In 7 cases with representative biopsies of segmental suspicious microcalcifications, the degree of resection could not be exactly measured. All but 2 biopsies were performed without clinically relevant complications and after gaining enough specimens (? 12.6 specimen, 1.85 rotations). Those 2 patients showed evidence of severe bleeding into the breast tissue and operative revision had to be performed (3.5%). The size of intramammary hematoma was measurable in 27 biopsies and showed a range from 0.5 to 5 cm (? 2.7 cm). The average external bleeding was still low with 16 mL (5-80 mL). In 3 of 61 lesions, it was not possible to gain representative tissue as a result of displacement of the lesion after introducing or shooting the needle. The average time needed for all biopsies was 28.2 minutes for all but 5 very complicated biopsies, which took 16.1 minutes. The histologic findings with further operative workup were: 10 ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), 4 atypical ductal hyperplasias, 1 atypical lobular hyperplasias (ALH), 3 lobular carcinomas in situ (LCIS), and 6 invasive ductal carcinomas. In 7 of 12 of the initial DCIS histologies, the operative histology was also DCIS, whereas in 4 of 12, no residual malignant tumor was found. In 1 of 12 patients with an initial DCIS histology, operative histology revealed invasive ductal cancer (8.3%). The cases with lobular lesions (ALH, LCIS) did not show any evidence for residual tissue in the operative workup. Most frequent benign histologies were mastopathy (13), ductal hyperplasia (9), fibroadenoma (8), and sclerosing adenosis (5). The control examinations (maximum 1 year) did not show any signs for a false-negative biopsy. CONCLUSION: The 11-G SVAB has proven to be a perfect adjunct to the existing breast biopsy methods. The new 8G SVAB speeds up the method when used for the same size of lesions and enables the user to representatively biopsy lesions up to 3 cm in diameter. The method is still minimally invasive; however, the amount of hematomas as well as clinically relevant complications is increased.     

Lobular carcinoma in situ at percutaneous breast biopsy: surgical biopsy findings.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review surgical histologic findings in women with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) at percutaneous breast biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of 1315 consecutive lesions that underwent percutaneous breast biopsy. Percutaneous biopsy yielded LCIS in 16 (1.2%) lesions. Subsequent surgical biopsy was performed in 14 lesions in 13 women. Histologic findings were reviewed. RESULTS: In five of the 14 lesions, percutaneous biopsy yielded LCIS and a high-risk lesion (radial scar in three and atypical ductal hyperplasia in two); in one (20%) of these five lesions, surgery revealed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In four of the 14 lesions, the LCIS in the percutaneous biopsy had features that overlapped with those of DCIS; in two (50%) of these four lesions, surgery revealed DCIS (n = 1) or infiltrating lobular carcinoma (n = 1). In the remaining five of the 14 lesions, surgery revealed no DCIS or infiltrating carcinoma. Five (38%) of 13 women with LCIS lesions had synchronous or metachronous infiltrating carcinoma (three ductal, one lobular, one mixed) in the ipsilateral (n = 1) or contralateral (n = 4) breast. CONCLUSION: Surgical excision was warranted in lesions in which LCIS was found at percutaneous breast biopsy when the percutaneous biopsy histologic features overlapped with those of DCIS, when a high-risk lesion was present, or when there was imaging-histologic discordance. LCIS without these factors was not shown to require surgical excision in our small series, but a larger study is needed. Diagnosis of LCIS at percutaneous biopsy is a marker for women who are at increased risk of ductal or lobular carcinoma in either breast.     

A case of lobular carcinoma in situ presenting as a solid mass

A patient presented with a 2 cm lump in the lower outer quadrant of the left breast. Mammogram and ultrasonography showed a solid mass with a microlobulated contour, partially irregular border and microcalcifications. MRI showed an irregular mass with early enhancement and high signal intensity, and the late-phase image demonstrated a partial washout pattern. These findings suggest that the tumour was a malignant invasive carcinoma. Non-invasive ductal carcinoma was diagnosed after a fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy followed by a partial breast excision and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. A pathological examination of the lesion displayed characteristic small monomorphic cells, solid proliferation and massive distension within the lobular unit. The tumour was immunohistochemically negative for E-cadherin and pure lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) was diagnosed. Pure LCIS is very rare and there have been no previous reports of pure LCIS forming a solid mass.     

Pre-operative simultaneous stereotactic core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of invasive lobular breast carcinoma

Purpose:
To determine the diagnostic value of stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) in comparison to stereotactic fine-needle aspiration biopsy (SFNAB) in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC).
Material and Methods:
Twenty-two patients with clinical or mammographic findings suspicious of malignancy underwent surgery where postoperative histopathology showed ILC. Pre-operative attempts of diagnosis were made using SFNAB and SCNB. SFNAB was done with a spinal needle 0.7- or 0.9-mm and SCNB was simultaneously performed with an automated 2.1-mm biopsy gun in all patients.
Results:
SFNAB was diagnostic of carcinoma in 9 women, showed "probable carcinoma" in 5 and "atypia" in 3. In the remaining 5 women, SFNAB showed no atypia.

SCNB diagnosed ILC in 20 patients and showed ILC as well as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in 1. Ductal carcinoma in situ was suggested in the remaining patient.
Conclusion:
SCNB was superior to SFNAB in diagnosing ILC and did not miss any carcinoma, whereas SFNAB was non-diagnostic in 8 cases. SCNB is thus recommended in patients with suspicion of ILC of the breast.     

Malignancy rates of stereotactic biopsies of two or more distinct sites of suspicious calcifications in women without known breast cancer

ObjectiveTo determine the malignancy rate in women without a concurrent breast cancer diagnosis at presentation who underwent stereotactic biopsies of distinct sites of suspicious calcifications.MethodsThis retrospective study included 280 women without a concurrent breast cancer diagnosis who underwent 587 stereotactic biopsies of two or more distinct sites of suspicious calcifications in one or both breasts at our institution from 2010 to 2015.ResultsThe overall malignancy rate was 27.9% (78/280, 95% CI, 22.7%–33.5%) at the patient level and 18.7% (110/587, 95% CI, 15.7%–22.1%) at the lesion level. Eighteen had invasive cancers (mean [range] diameter, 0.5 cm [0.1–1.7]; six grade I, ten grade II, two grade III), one of whom had multifocal and another bilateral malignancy. Sixty had ductal carcinoma in situ. Of the 171 with all calcifications of the same morphology, 139 (81.3%) had all calcifications in the same pathology category (benign, high-risk, or malignant).ConclusionThe malignancy rate is substantial in women who undergo stereotactic biopsies of two or more distinct calcification sites. Given the nearly 20% rate of dissimilar histopathology between calcification sites with similar morphology, if only one site is biopsied and results in a malignant pathology, biopsy of the additional calcifications is warranted. Even if the pathology result of the one site biopsy is benign, biopsy of additional sites may perhaps still be necessary.     

Malignancy rates of stereotactic biopsies of two or more distinct sites of suspicious calcifications in women without known breast cancer

ObjectiveTo determine the malignancy rate in women without a concurrent breast cancer diagnosis at presentation who underwent stereotactic biopsies of distinct sites of suspicious calcifications.MethodsThis retrospective study included 280 women without a concurrent breast cancer diagnosis who underwent 587 stereotactic biopsies of two or more distinct sites of suspicious calcifications in one or both breasts at our institution from 2010 to 2015.ResultsThe overall malignancy rate was 27.9% (78/280, 95% CI, 22.7%–33.5%) at the patient level and 18.7% (110/587, 95% CI, 15.7%–22.1%) at the lesion level. Eighteen had invasive cancers (mean [range] diameter, 0.5 cm [0.1–1.7]; six grade I, ten grade II, two grade III), one of whom had multifocal and another bilateral malignancy. Sixty had ductal carcinoma in situ. Of the 171 with all calcifications of the same morphology, 139 (81.3%) had all calcifications in the same pathology category (benign, high-risk, or malignant).ConclusionThe malignancy rate is substantial in women who undergo stereotactic biopsies of two or more distinct calcification sites. Given the nearly 20% rate of dissimilar histopathology between calcification sites with similar morphology, if only one site is biopsied and results in a malignant pathology, biopsy of the additional calcifications is warranted. Even if the pathology result of the one site biopsy is benign, biopsy of additional sites may perhaps still be necessary.     

Detection and localization of occult lesions using breast magnetic resonance imaging: initial experience in a community hospital

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcome of diagnostic breast MR imaging followed by MR guided needle localization for mammographically and sonographically occult breast lesions in a community-based hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of the initial 50 consecutive patients who underwent MR guided needle localizations at our institution from November 2001 to January 2003 were reviewed. Sixty-two lesions were localized by MR and were mammographically and sonographically occult. Pathology following excision was reviewed and correlated with the MR findings. RESULTS: Cancer was present in 15 % (9/62) of lesions or 18 % (9/50) of the women localized. Five of the lesions (56%) were invasive carcinoma and four (44%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). High-risk lesions, including atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), were found in 6.5 % (4/62) of the lesions, while 3 % (2/62) of the lesions contained lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Cancer plus high risk lesions were found in 15/62 (24%) lesions or 14/50 (28%) of women who underwent biopsy. CONCLUSION: The data in this study supports findings from other studies conducted by large research institutions. In this regard, it is important that community-based hospitals, such as the one operating this breast MR program, can achieve the same positive predictive values as those found in data emanating from academic institutions.     

Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: clinical, pathologic, and mammographic features

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) was diagnosed in 165 surgical specimens (119 patients) at our institution between 1974 and 1987. LCIS was seen more often in younger women (mean age, 49 years) than other breast carcinomas were (mean age, 58 years). Sampling of a single breast revealed multifocal disease in 70% (96/138). When both breasts were sampled, bilateral foci were found in 50% (41/82). Of 165 breasts with foci of LCIS, 37% (61/165) had simultaneously occurring invasive cancers in the same breast. Direct mammographic-pathologic correlation of foci of LCIS was possible in 73 breasts (67 patients). Microcalcifications were an indication for biopsy in 49% (20/41) of breasts with a mammographic abnormality, but were a nonspecific finding often found in tissues adjacent to foci of LCIS. The mammogram was normal in 44% (32/73) of breasts with foci of LCIS. The mammograms of patients with LCIS and those from a group of age-matched control subjects were compared by using a modified form of Wolfe's criteria and the percentage of fibroglandular elements. LCIS was seldom found in an N1 breast (1% vs 29%) or in a breast with less than 25% of its parenchymal area occupied by fibroglandular density (3% vs 33%). Compared with the control group, breasts with LCIS had more than 50% fibroglandular density (85% vs 45%) and a much higher frequency of the DY pattern (56% vs 36%). More fibroglandular density was seen in the LCIS group at all ages. Postmenopausally, the frequencies of the DY pattern and fibroglandular density greater than 50% in LCIS patients were nearly double those in the control group. LCIS patients have disease of the entire breast parenchyma, characterized by multifocality and bilaterality of various forms of lobular disease. Their mammograms reveal a higher rate of the DY pattern and higher percentages of fibroglandular or parenchymal density than those of age-matched controls. In LCIS patients, persistence of the DY pattern, or large amounts of fibroglandular density postmenopausally supports the concept that mammographically dense breasts are a marker for increased cancer risk in women 50 years old and older.     

Invasive lobular carcinoma: sonographic features of cancers detected in a BreastScreen Program

Sixty-two screen-detected invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC) were studied for sonographic, mammographic, clinical and histological findings. Ultrasound (US) features were compared with 60 invasive duct cancers (IDC). Size and axillary lymph node status in ILC were compared with all other cancers detected. In 41 ILC examined with US, 36 were found as masses (87.8% sensitivity; 95% CI 77.8-97.8%). Some US features of ILC and IDC differed: ILC were 9.94 times more likely to be hyperechoic (odds ratio, OR, 9.94; 95% CI 3.28-31.74) and 77% less likely to be taller than wide (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.18-0.62). Thirty-three ILC showed typical malignant features of spiculate margins and acoustic shadowing. invasive lobular carcinomas had a greater mean diameter (20.4 mm; n = 60) than other invasive cancers (14.4 mm; n = 322) (P < 0.001). Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy was the method of diagnosis in 26 of 41 impalpable ILC (63%). Ultrasound has high sensitivity in characterizing screen-detected ILC, which may have atypical sonographic features including hyperechogenicity and a wider than tall shape. Ultrasound was an important contributor to diagnosis.     

Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: mammographic features

Lobular carcinoma in situ (lobular neoplasia; LCIS) of the breast is most commonly an incidental microscopic finding in breast tissue removed for some other reason. The authors reviewed the clinical and mammographic features and surgical findings in 26 cases of LCIS not associated with other breast abnormalities. In 16 instances, needle localization was performed before removal of the tissue, which yielded LCIS on histologic examination. Calcifications were the most common reason for biopsy, although there were no distinctive mammographic features of LCIS.     

Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of papillary lesions, radial scars, or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy (SCNB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 1,236 lesions sampled with SCNB yielded 22 papillary lesions, nine radial scars, and five LCIS lesions. Diffuse lesions such as papillomatosis, papillary ductal hyperplasia, papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and atypical lobular hyperplasia were not included. The mammographic findings, associated histologic features, and outcome were assessed for each case. RESULTS: Sixteen papillary lesions were diagnosed as benign at SCNB. Of these, five were benign at excision, and 10 were unremarkable at mammographic follow-up. At excision of an unusual lesion containing a microscopic papillary lesion, DCIS was found. Three of four papillary lesions suspicious at SCNB proved to be papillary carcinomas; the fourth had no residual carcinoma at excision. Eight of nine radial scars were excised, which revealed atypical hyperplasia in four scars but no malignancies. One LCIS lesion was found at excision to contain DCIS. CONCLUSION: Benign or malignant papillary lesions were accurately diagnosed with SCNB in the majority of cases. Cases diagnosed as suspicious for malignancy or with atypia or unusual associated histologic findings should be excised. No malignancies were found at excision of radial scars diagnosed at SCNB. Surgical removal of these lesions following SCNB may not be routinely necessary. DCIS was found in one lesion diagnosed as LCIS at SCNB, which suggests that removal of these lesions may be prudent.     

Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 268 nonpalpable lesions

PURPOSE: We evaluated the reliability of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies (VAB) from our personal experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2003 and December 2005, 268 patients underwent VAB with an 11-gauge probe at our institution. Inclusion criteria were nonpalpable lesions, undetectable by ultrasound and suspected at mammography (microcalcifications, circumscribed mass, architectural distortion), for which cytology and/or core biopsy could not provide a definite diagnosis. Lesion mammographic patterns were microcalcifications in 186 cases (77.5%), mostly localised clusters (130/186: 70%); circumscribed mass with or without microcalcifications in 36 cases (15%) and architectural distortion with or without microcalcifications in 18 cases (7.5%). On the basis of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification, 16 cases (7%) were graded as highly suspicious for malignancy (BI-RADS 5), 81 (34%) as suspicious for malignancy (BI-RADS 4b), 97 (40%) as indeterminate (BI-RADS 4a) and 46 (19%) as probably benign (BI-RADS 3). Lesion size was 20 mm in only 38 cases (16%), 30 of which appeared as microcalcifications. RESULTS: In 28/268 lesions (10.5%) the biopsy could not be performed (nonidentification of the lesion; inaccessibility due to location or breast size). In 12/240 (5%) biopsies, the sample was not representative. Pathology revealed 100/240 (42%) malignant or borderline lesions and 140/240 (58%) benign lesions. Among the malignant lesions, 16/100 (16%) were invasive carcinoma [infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) or infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC)], 13/100 (13%) were microinvasive (T1mic), 35/100 (35%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 9/100 (9%) were lobular carcinoma in situ (CLIS). Among the borderline lesions, 27/100 (27%) were atypical epithelial hyperplasia [atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH)]. In 9/100 surgically treated lesions (9%), there was discordance between the microhistological findings of VAB and the pathological results of the surgical procedure: 8/9 were underestimated by VAB (four ADH vs. DCIS, three DCIS vs. IDC, one ADH vs. IDC), and 1/9 was overestimated (T1mic vs. DCIS). Complications following VAB occurred in 9/240 patients (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, VAB showed fair reliability in the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions despite a portion of failed (10.5%), nonsignificant (5%) procedures and underestimated lesions (9%).     

Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy.

PURPOSE: To assess the pathologic outcome of amorphous breast calcifications and the success of stereotactic biopsy for such lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1995 through February 2000, biopsy of all clustered amorphous calcifications not clearly stable for at least 5 years or in a diffuse scattered distribution was recommended. Logistic regression analysis was used to stratify the risk of malignancy by patient risk factors, calcification distribution, and stability. RESULTS: Calcifications were retrieved from 150 biopsies; 30 (20%) proved malignant and included 27 ductal carcinomas in situ and three low-grade invasive and intraductal carcinomas (2-5 mm). Another 30 (20%) yielded high-risk lesions, including 21 atypical ductal hyperplasia, eight atypical lobular hyperplasia, and one lobular carcinoma in situ. In 150 lesions, stereotactic biopsy was performed on 113 and aborted in 10. Calcifications were retrieved from all 113 stereotactic biopsies. Of those with calcification retrieval, there were three histologic underestimates (accuracy, 97%). Stereotactic biopsy spared a surgical procedure in 57 (46%) of 123 patients. Needle localization was required for 23 (15%) of 150 patients due to poor conspicuity. Five (45%) of 11 biopsies performed in women with ipsilateral breast cancer showed malignancy (P = .025). When multiple lesions of amorphous calcifications were present in one breast, sampling of one reliably predicted the outcome of others. CONCLUSION: We found a substantial rate of ductal carcinoma in situ and high-risk lesions associated with amorphous calcifications. Stereotactic biopsy can be successfully performed for the majority of subtle amorphous calcifications; however, only a minority were spared a surgical procedure.