Lung function and symptom improvement with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and ipratropium bromide/albuterol in COPD: response by beta-agonist reversibility

This retrospective analysis of data from two multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel group studies compared the efficacy of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FSC) 250/50 mcg twice daily with ipratropium bromide/albuterol (IB/ALB) 36/206 mcg four times daily in albuterol-reversible (n=320 [44%]) and non-reversible (n=399 [56%]) patients with COPD. In reversible and non-reversible patients, both treatments significantly increased FEV(1)AUC(0-6h) from baseline and the magnitude of improvement was larger in reversible patients. FSC increased FEV(1)AUC(0-6h) by 1.46+/-0.08 and 1.98+/-0.13 l-h at Day 1 and Week 8, respectively, in reversible patients, compared with 0.71+/-0.06 and 0.94+/-0.10 l-h in non-reversible patients (p<0.001). With IB/ALB, increases were 1.46+/-0.08 and 1.19+/-0.11 l-h at Day 1 in reversible patients and Week 8, respectively, and 0.89+/-0.06 and 0.74+/-0.09 l-h (p < or = 0.041) in non-reversible patients. After 8 weeks, in both the reversible and non-reversible populations, the FEV(1) AUC(0-6h) significantly increased with FSC treatment (p < or = 0.002) and significantly decreased with IB/ALB (p < or = 0.010). In both reversibility groups, improvement in Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) scores, overall daytime diary symptom scores and nocturnal symptom measures were significantly greater with FSC treatment compared with IB/ALB (p < or = 0.044). Reversibility status was not predictive of the magnitude of reduction in symptom scores. We conclude that both reversible and non-reversible patients receive greater clinical benefit with FSC compared with IB/ALB and acute bronchodilator reversibility is not useful for differentiating patients based on symptomatic responses to FSC compared with IB/ALB.     

First-line therapy for adult patients with acute asthma receiving a multiple-dose protocol of ipratropium bromide plus albuterol in the emergency department

We designed a larger, double-blind, randomized, prospective trial to test our hypothesis that patients with acute asthma given combination high dose therapy with ipratropium bromide (IB) and beta(2)-agonists will have greater improvement in pulmonary function and fewer hospital admissions than those given beta(2)-agonists alone. One hundred eighty patients (mean age +/- SD, 34.3 +/- 10.5 yr) who presented to an emergency department (ED) for treatment of an exacerbation of asthma (baseline FEV(1) < 50% of predicted) were assigned in a randomized, double-blind fashion to receive albuterol and placebo (n = 92) or albuterol and IB (n = 88). Both drugs were administered through a metered-dose inhaler and spacer at 10-min intervals for 3 h (24 puffs or 2,880 microg of albuterol and 504 microg of IB each hour). Primary outcome measures were improvement in pulmonary function (FEV(1) or peak expiratory flow [PEF]), and hospital admission rates. In both groups, pulmonary function improved significantly over baseline values (p < 0.01). Subjects who received IB had an overall 20.5% (95% CI: 2.6 to 38.4%) (p = 0.02) greater improvement in PEF and a 48.1% (95% CI: 19.8 to 76.4%) (p = 0.001) greater improvement in FEV(1) from the control group. At the end of protocol (3 h), 39% (n = 36) of patients in the control group and 20% (n = 18) in the IB group were admitted (p = 0.01). The use of high doses of IB reduced the risk of hospital admission 49% (relative risk = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.83). Five (95% CI: 3 to 17) patients would need to be treated with high doses of IB to prevent a single admission. Kaplan-Meier-estimated curves of the proportion of patients who reached the discharge threshold during the 3 h of treatment, showed a significant difference in favor of the IB group (log-rank test = 0.005). A subgroup analysis showed that patients most likely to benefit from the addition of high doses of IB were those with more severe obstruction (FEV(1) /= 24 h). On the contrary, previous use of inhaled beta(2)-agonists did not modify the admission rate and the pulmonary function response to IB. In conclusion, our data support a substantial therapeutic benefit from the addition of IB to albuterol administered in high doses through MDI plus spacer, particularly in patients with FEV(1) less than 30%, and with long duration of symptoms before the ED presentation (>/= 24 h).     

Efficacy of atropine methylnitrate alone and in combination with albuterol in children with asthma

The bronchodilator effect of nebulized AMN, albuterol and their combination was evaluated in 16 steroid-dependent asthmatic children. In phase 1, maximal bronchodilation was determined by dose-response studies on separate days. Maximal bronchodilator dose of each drug was administered either alone or in combination during phase 2. In phase 1, 0.11 +/- 0.01 mg/kg of albuterol and 0.03 mg/kg of AMN produced maximum bronchodilation. In phase 2, the peak response to albuterol occurred within 30 min and to AMN, at 60 min. Maximal FEV1 achieved after AMN was 90 percent of the maximal achieved after albuterol. AMN FEV1 response was better than for placebo for 3 h; that for albuterol was better for 4 h. Combination therapy produced a peak response similar to that of albuterol but was better than albuterol by 6 h. Thus, the maximum bronchodilator effect of AMN is less than that of albuterol in asthmatic children, but the combination may extend the period of bronchodilatation.     

Bronchodilator response to albuterol after regular formoterol and effects of acute corticosteroid administration

BACKGROUND: There is controversy about the development of bronchodilator subsensitivity after regular administration of long-acting beta(2)-agonists. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether regular treatment with formoterol affects the bronchodilator response to repeated puffs of albuterol, and also to assess the effects of acute administration of a bolus dose of IV or inhaled corticosteroid. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients (mean [SD] age, 43 [15] years; FEV(1), 57 [17] % predicted) with stable, moderate to severe persistent asthma who were all taking inhaled corticosteroids were evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study. Patients received treatments each for 2 weeks followed by a bolus (IV/inhaled) of corticosteroid or placebo: (1) placebo inhaler bid + bolus placebo; (2) formoterol Turbuhaler 24 microg metered dosage bid (delivered dosage 18 microg bid) + placebo; (3) formoterol 24 microg bid + bolus IV hydrocortisone, 200 mg; or (4) formoterol 24 microg bid + bolus inhaled budesonide, 1,600 microg. Bronchodilator response to repeated puffs of albuterol (200 to 1,600 microg) for > 80 min was measured at 2 h after bolus administration of placebo or corticosteroid. The study was powered at the 80% level to detect a 20% difference in area under curve between 20 and 80 min (AUC) for FEV(1) response to albuterol as change from baseline (primary end point). RESULTS: There was significant subsensitivity (p = 0.01) of the mean albuterol FEV(1) response (as AUC, L x s) after formoterol alone (737) as compared to placebo (1,453) along with partial reversal by steroid administration: formoterol + hydrocortisone (1, 050), and formoterol + budesonide (942). There was a similar pattern of subsensitivity (p = 0.03) for the mean albuterol forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity response (as AUC, L): placebo (2,149), formoterol alone (1,002), formoterol + hydrocortisone (1,402), and formoterol + budesonide (1,271). CONCLUSION: Regular treatment with formoterol produced significant bronchodilator subsensitivity to repeated puffs of albuterol, which was partially reversed by a bolus dose of systemic or inhaled corticosteroid.     

Effect of albuterol on maximal exercise capacity in cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND: Inhaled, short-acting beta-adrenergic agonists (SAbetaAs) are widely prescribed in cystic fibrosis (CF) subjects, despite a lack of convincing data for efficacy and the potential for these agents to result in airway instability. We tested the hypothesis that inhaled albuterol would improve maximal exercise performance in CF subjects with airflow obstruction, as a result of acute bronchodilation. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of the effect of inhaled albuterol on maximal exercise performance in 20 stable adult CF patients (mean +/- SD age, 23.3 +/- 6.1 years; FEV(1), 57.65 +/- 17.13% of predicted). RESULTS: Ventilatory limitation to exercise was demonstrated in 16 subjects (80%). Significant bronchodilation occurred with exercise alone (end-exercise FEV(1), 2.24 +/- 0.8 L; vs preexercise FEV(1), 2.09 +/- 0.77 L; p < 0.0001), but albuterol resulted in significantly greater exercise-induced bronchodilation than placebo (change in FEV(1), 0.3 +/- 0.15 L vs 0.15 +/- 0.11 L; 95% confidence interval [CI], + 0.07 to + 0.23; p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in maximal workload achieved (albuterol, 158 +/- 46 W; vs placebo, 158 +/- 45 W; 95% CI, - 4.41 to + 4.71; p = 0.95), nor any other measure of exercise performance including maximal oxygen uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Despite causing significant acute bronchodilation, inhaled albuterol did not improve maximal exercise performance in ventilatory-limited CF adults, adding to the body of literature that fails to show any clinical benefit of SAbetaAs in CF subjects. The current results provide further evidence to question the widespread use of these agents, although the potential for adrenergic beta-agonists to instead improve submaximal exercise performance merits further investigation.     

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of a combination of ipratropium plus albuterol compared with ipratropium alone and albuterol alone in COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To conduct a post hoc pharmacoeconomic evaluation of two double-blind, randomized, prospective, parallel group studies comparing the long-term efficacy and safety of ipratropium combined with albuterol in a single inhalational canister against either bronchodilator agent alone in patients with COPD. Patients: One thousand sixty-seven patients with COPD. METHODS: The dose of each bronchodilator was two puffs four times a day (42 microg of ipratropium bromide, 240 microg of albuterol sulfate). Pulmonary function testing was performed on days 1, 29, 57, and 85 of treatment. Outcomes, health-care resource consumption, and costs were compared for the three treatment groups over the 85-day study period. A total of 1,067 patients were randomized in the two studies (albuterol alone, n = 347; ipratropium alone, n = 362; albuterol plus ipratropium, n = 358). RESULTS: Improvement in FEV1 and area under the FEV1 response-time curve from time 0 to 4 h (FEV1AUC0-4) was significantly greater for the combination of albuterol plus ipratropium than either agent alone on all test days. Compared with albuterol, patients receiving ipratropium and ipratropium plus albuterol experienced significantly fewer COPD exacerbations and patient-days of exacerbation. In addition, the increased frequency of exacerbations observed in the albuterol group was associated with a significant increase in the number of patient hospital days and antibiotic and corticosteroid use. As a result, the total cost of treatment over the study period was significantly less for ipratropium ($156 per patient) and ipratropium plus albuterol ($197 per patient) than for albuterol ($269 per patient). Increased cost-effectiveness, defined as total estimated treatment cost per mean change in FEV1AUC0-4, was observed in both treatment arms containing ipratropium. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of ipratropium in a pharmacologic treatment regimen is associated with a lower rate of exacerbations in COPD. The result is lower total treatment costs and improved cost-effectiveness.     

A double-blind crossover study comparing the safety and efficacy of three weeks of Flu/Sal 250/50 bid plus albuterol 180 ug prn q4 hours to Flu/Sal 250/50 bid plus albuterol/Ipratropium bromide 2 puffs prn q4 hours in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of Fluticasone 250 microg/Salmeterol 50 microg 1 puff bid for maintenance therapy in patients with COPD associated with chronic bronchitis. Short-acting beta agonists (SABA) have been the recommended rescue medication; however, previous studies have shown that combination short-acting Albuterol (alb) /Ipratropium bromide (IB) has superior bronchodilator properties to albuterol alone in patients with COPD. The safety and efficacy of Albuterol compared to Albuterol/Ipratropium bromide as rescue medications for COPD patients on maintenance combination therapy of ICS/LABA has not been evaluated. Double-blind randomized crossover trial with COPD subjects receiving Fluticasone/ Salmeterol 500 microg/50 microg (Flu/Sal) 1 puff twice daily and 2 puffs of Albuterol Sulfate (90 microg micrograms per inhalation) or 2 puffs of Albuterol (90 microg/puff and Ipratropium Bromide 18 microg/puff. Either Albuterol Sulfate (90 micrograms/puff) or Alb (90 micrograms/puff)/IB used prn for 3 weeks before crossing over to the other rescue formulation. This is a non-inferiority study where safety and efficacy outcomes were serially assessed, including adverse events, Baseline (BDI)/Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), SF36, diary cards, 24-hour cardiac monitoring, potassium and glucose levels and other adverse events. Twenty subjects completed the study. The mean age was 62.5 (+/- 14.5); 12 were males. The mean baseline FEV(1) (range) was 1.12 L (0.56-1.67) or 40.6 (21-65)% predicted. There were no statistically significant differences between either rescue inhaler formulation with regard to measures neither of lung function or dyspnea nor in terms of safety parameters of cardiac monitoring, glucose and potassium levels and other adverse events. SABA and combination SABA/Ipratropium bromide are equally safe and efficacious as rescue inhalers for patients on combination Fluticasone 500 microg/Salmeterol 50 microg.     

A comparison of responses to albuterol delivered by two aerosol devices

Nineteen outpatients with stable obstructive pulmonary disease (mean forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1], 1.00 + 0.10 L) were evaluated for airway response to albuterol (salbutamol) administered by metered-dose inhaler and Bosch ultrasonic nebulizer (BUSN). Albuterol administered by metered-dose inhaler but not by nebulizer caused a significant increase in FEV1 and the mean forced expiratory flow over the middle half of the forced vital capacity (FEF25-75%) (p less than 0.02). Absolute increase from baseline of FEV1 and FEF25-75% was significantly greater for metered-dose inhaler (0.21 +/- 0.05 L; 0.32 +/- 0.13 L/sec) compared to ultrasonic nebulizer (0.07 +/- 0.03 L; 0.03 +/- 0.04 L/sec) (p less than 0.02). In 11 subjects (mean FEV1, 1.08 + 0.14 L), the placebo effect of inhalation of the diluent from the metered-dose inhaler (Freon) and the ultrasonic nebulizer (isotonic saline solution) was determined. Freon produced the mean increase of 1.5 percent, whereas the ultrasonic aerosol of isotonic saline solution resulted in a mean decrease of 8 percent in FEV1. Therefore, the inferior response to albuterol administered by ultrasonic nebulizer was at least in part due to the superimposed broncho-constriction occurring with ultrasonically administered saline solution. The metered-dose inhaler was more effective than the ultrasonic nebulizer for administration of albuterol in stable obstructive pulmonary disease, and the latter device is not recommended. A specific ultrasonic nebulizer should be prescribed only if its superiority to a metered-dose inhaler can be objectively documented.     

Furosemide plus albuterol compared with albuterol alone in children with acute asthma.

Several reports have shown that inhaled furosemide protects patients with asthma from different bronchoconstrictor agents. However, the effect of this widely used diuretic in acute exacerbation in adults is unproven. There are no reports of furosemide's therapeutic effect in acute asthma in children; thus, the objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the combined treatment of furosemide and albuterol in pediatric patients. Using a double-blind design, 20 emergency room patients with an asthmatic exacerbation were studied and randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: (1) furosemide + albuterol (1 and 0.15 mg/kg, respectively) or (2) albuterol (0.15 mg/kg). The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was measured in each patient before medication and then 30 and 60 minutes after inhalation of the individual drug or drug combination. Neither group differed in age or baseline FEV1. An increase in FEV1 of 22.8 +/- 4.3% (mean +/- SE) in the drug combination group was noted at 60 minutes, and an increase in FEV1 of 18.0 +/- 2.6% in the albuterol group was obtained at the same time. Although the increase in FEV1 was greater in the first group after 1 hour of treatment, this was not significant. These results suggest that inhaled furosemide does not have a synergistic effect with albuterol in the treatment of asthmatic exacerbations in children.     

Bronchodilator efficacy of tiotropium in patients with mild to moderate COPD.

AIMS: Evaluation of tiotropium efficacy in patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) defined by the 2003 Swedish Society of Respiratory Medicine guidelines (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <70%; FEV1 >60% predicted). METHODS: In this 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tiotropium 18 mcg once daily versus placebo, respiratory function was assessed on Days 1, 15 and 85 (baseline: pre-dose Day 1). RESULTS: Mean+/-SD baseline FEV1 (% predicted) was 73.4+/-12.5 (tiotropium, n=107; placebo, n=117). Tiotropium significantly improved change from baseline in area under the curve from pre-dose to 2 hours post-dose (AUC0-2 h) FEV1 versus placebo, by 166+/-26 mL (mean+/-SE) at study end (p<0.0001). With tiotropium, there were significant increases in the change in AUC0-2 h FVC versus baseline, and trough FEV1 and FVC, versus placebo, on all test days (p<0.01). Adverse event rates were similar. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, tiotropium improved lung function in patients with mild COPD.     

Continuous nebulization of albuterol (salbutamol) in acute asthma

We studied the safety and efficacy of albuterol (salbutamol) delivered by continuous nebulization (CN) in the initial emergency department treatment of asthma. In a randomized fashion 21 patients received 5 mg of albuterol by bolus nebulization (BN) at time 0 and again 60 minutes later. Twenty-one others received albuterol (0.2 mg/ml) by CN using a calibrated nebulizer with a known output of 25 ml/h. Thus, each patient had received 10 mg of albuterol over two hours. FEV1, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and hand tremor were recorded at 30-minute intervals. The FEV1 was 1.48 +/- 0.64 L prior to BN and increased to a maximum of 2.20 +/- 0.94 L (p less than 0.05) 90 minutes later. The FEV1 prior to CN was 1.13 +/- 0.51 L and improved to 2.20 +/- 1.02 L (p less than 0.05) at 120 minutes. The FEV1 did not differ significantly between regimens over the 2-hour period. Both modes of therapy were well tolerated. There was a slight but significant increase in HR at 30 and 90 minutes in the BN group when compared with CN. There was no significant difference in BP, RR, or tremor between the groups. Thus, albuterol by CN was found to be equally effective as the same medication by BN in the early treatment of asthma in patients seen in the emergency department.     

A pooled analysis of FEV1 decline in COPD patients randomized to inhaled corticosteroids or placebo

BACKGROUND: There is controversy about whether therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) modifies the natural history of COPD, characterized by an accelerated decline in FEV(1). METHODS: The Inhaled Steroids Effect Evaluation in COPD (ISEEC) study is a pooled study of patient-level data from seven long-term randomized controlled trials of ICS vs placebo lasting >/= 12 months in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. We have previously reported a survival benefit for ICS therapy in COPD patients using ISEEC data. We aimed to determine whether the regular use of ICSs vs placebo improves FEV(1) decline in COPD patients, and whether this relationship is modified by gender and smoking. RESULTS: There were 3,911 randomized participants (29.2% female) in this analysis. In the first 6 months after randomization, ICS use was associated with a significant mean (+/- SE) relative increase in FEV(1) of 2.42 +/- 0.19% compared with placebo (p < 0.01), which is quantifiable in absolute terms as 42 mL in men and 29 mL in women over 6 months. From 6 to 36 months, there was no significant difference between placebo and ICS therapy in terms of FEV(1) decline (-0.01 +/- 0.09%; p = 0.86). The initial treatment effect was dependent on smoking status and gender. Smokers who continued to smoke had a smaller increase in FEV(1) during the first 6 months than did ex-smokers. Female ex-smokers had a larger increase in FEV(1) with ICS therapy than did male ex-smokers. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in COPD in the first 6 months of treatment, ICS therapy is more effective in ex-smokers than in current smokers with COPD in improving lung function, and women may have a bigger response to ICSs than men. However, it seems that after 6 months, ICS therapy does not modify the decline in FEV(1) among those who completed these randomized clinical trials.     

Safety of long-term treatment with HFA albuterol

BACKGROUND: Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) used as propellants in metered-dose inhalers deplete stratospheric ozone, which results in serious public health concerns. Albuterol has been reformulated in the non-ozone-depleting propellant, hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA albuterol). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the safety of HFA albuterol to an albuterol product formulated in chlorofluorocarbon propellants (CFC albuterol) during 1 year of treatment in asthmatics. Bronchodilator efficacy of the two products was assessed as a secondary objective. METHODS: The results from two open-label, parallel-group trials of similar design in asthmatics requiring short-acting beta-agonists for symptom control were combined. Patients took two puffs bid of either HFA albuterol or CFC albuterol for 1 year. Additional puffs of study drug were allowed as needed to control asthma symptoms. Adverse events were recorded at clinic visits. Patients self-administered study drug at quarterly visits and underwent serial spirometry during a 6-h period postdose. Bronchodilator efficacy variables, based on FEV1 response to study drug, were proportion of responders, time to onset of effect, peak percent change, time to peak effect, duration of effect, and area under the curve. Differences between products and changes over time in efficacy variables were assessed using an analysis of variance model. Regression analyses with FEV1 as a covariate were performed post-hoc to analyze changes in bronchodilator efficacy over time. RESULTS: Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar for patients receiving HFA albuterol (n = 337) and CFC albuterol (n = 132). Total reported adverse events were similar for the two treatments. Differences in only four individual adverse events were noted: the HFA albuterol group reported more gastroenteritis and dizziness; the CFC albuterol group reported more epistaxis and expectoration. Adverse events attributed to study drug use were infrequent. No serious adverse events were related to study drug use. Predose FEV1 at quarterly visits increased to a small extent in both groups from month 0 to month 12. The bronchodilator efficacy of HFA albuterol was comparable to that of CFC albuterol at the quarterly visits, but decreased from baseline for both products over the 12 months of treatment. Use of inhaled corticosteroids, nasal corticosteroids, or theophylline did not explain the increase in predose FEV1 over time and did not protect patients from developing reduced bronchodilator efficacy by month 12. The change in predose FEV1 did not entirely account for the reduced bronchodilator efficacy over time. CONCLUSIONS: HFA albuterol has a safety profile similar to that of CFC albuterol during chronic, scheduled use, and both drugs are well tolerated. HFA albuterol and CFC albuterol provided comparable bronchodilator efficacy, but bronchodilator efficacy decreased for both products with 1 year of use.     

The inhibitory effect of nebulized albuterol on the early and late asthmatic reactions and increase in airway responsiveness provoked by inhaled allergen in asthma

It is widely held that inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists inhibit the early asthmatic response (EAR) but not the late response (LAR) or attendant increase in bronchial responsiveness. In this study of 10 atopic asthmatic subjects, we have investigated the effects of a high dose of nebulized albuterol (2.5 mg) on the allergen-provoked EAR, LAR, and increase in histamine responsiveness. In a randomized blinded fashion, study subjects inhaled the following combinations: albuterol followed 10 min later by allergen, placebo followed by allergen, albuterol followed by saline (albuterol, placebo, and control study periods, respectively). Airway caliber was measured as FEV1 and followed at regular intervals for 7.5 h postallergen. Bronchial responsiveness to histamine was measured and recorded as the PC20 value before and at 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, and 7.5 h after allergen or control challenge. During the placebo study period, allergen challenge caused mean 29.6 +/- 6.4 and 24.4 +/- 6.4% falls in FEV1 at 20 min and 7.5 h, respectively (both p less than 0.05), and a progressive decrease in PC20 amounting to a geometric mean of 1.9 doubling dilutions at 7.5 h (p less than 0.05). Albuterol followed by allergen resulted in a 13.1 +/- 2.2% increase in FEV1 prior to allergen followed by abolition of the EAR and inhibition of the LAR with only a 9.2 +/- 3.5% fall in FEV1 at 7.5 h, significantly different from that of placebo at 7.5 h (p = 0.048). Similarly, PC20 histamine fell by only 0.64 doubling dilutions at 7.5 h, not significantly different from baseline values but different from placebo values (p = 0.03).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A long-term evaluation of once-daily inhaled tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Currently available inhaled bronchodilators used as therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) necessitate multiple daily dosing. The present study evaluates the long-term safety and efficacy of tiotropium, a new once-daily anticholinergic in COPD. Patients with stable COPD (age 65.2+/-8.7 yrs (mean+/-SD), n=921) were enrolled in two identical randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 1-yr studies. Patients inhaled tiotropium 18 microg or placebo (mean screening forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.01 versus 0.99 L, 39.1 and 38.1% of the predicted value) once daily as a dry powder. The primary spirometric outcome was trough FEV1 (i.e. FEV1 prior to dosing). Changes in dyspnoea were measured using the Transition Dyspnea Index, and health status with the disease-specific St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire and the generic Short Form 36. Medication use and adverse events were recorded. Tiotropium provided significantly superior bronchodilation relative to placebo for trough FEV1 response (approximately 12% over baseline) (p<0.01) and mean response during the 3 h following dosing (approximately 22% over baseline) (p<0.001) over the 12-month period. Tiotropium recipients showed less dyspnoea (p<0.001), superior health status scores, and fewer COPD exacerbations and hospitalizations (p<0.05). Adverse events were comparable with placebo, except for dry mouth incidence (tiotropium 16.0% versus placebo 2.7%, p<0.05). Tiotropium is an effective, once-daily bronchodilator that reduces dyspnoea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation frequency and improves health status. This suggests that tiotropium will make an important contribution to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease therapy.     

Dose-response characteristics of nebulized albuterol in the treatment of acutely ill, hospitalized asthmatics.

We investigated the bronchodilator dose-response to nebulized albuterol and the dose of albuterol which produces maximal bronchodilation in the acutely ill, hospitalized asthmatic. Consecutively admitted patients from the emergency room in status asthmaticus who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (age <41 years old and <12 pack-years of smoking) were studied. Albuterol was administered by nebulizer (Puritan-Bennett Raindrop) in repeated 2.5-mg treatments up to a total dose of 10 mg and the bronchodilator response was measured by a computerized spirometer. Twenty-two patients were studied. Baseline spirometry showed a (mean +/- SE) forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) of 1.26 +/- 0.14 L (42 +/- 4.0% predicted), which increased significantly (p < 0.05) during albuterol titration to a maximum FEV1 of 1.70 +/- 0.19 L (57 +/- 5% of predicted). After cumulative doses of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 mg of nebulized albuterol, 27%, 45%, 72%, and 77% of patients, respectively, attained maximum bronchodilation. The remaining 23% of patients did not respond to doses up to 10 mg of albuterol. The maximum FEV1 response to albuterol did not correlate with the initial severity of airflow obstruction (r = 0.36, p > 0.05). Pulse rate and arterial oxygen saturation were not significantly affected by nebulized albuterol up to a total dose of 10 mg. No arrhythmias were noted. In summary, most hospitalized asthmatics (72%) required a cumulative dose of 7.5 mg of nebulized albuterol to achieve maximum bronchodilation and a large fraction (50%) required higher albuterol doses than the standard 2.5 mg. The bronchodilatory response to nebulized albuterol varied widely among patients in status asthmaticus and could not be predicted from the initial severity of airflow obstruction. Because side effects were minimal, it would be reasonable to use 7.5 mg of nebulized albuterol as initial therapy. Alternatively, dose-response titration with albuterol would be advantageous.     

Principal findings of systematic reviews of acute asthma treatment in childhood

Objective: The objective of this study is to summarize the principal findings in the literature about acute asthma management in children. Methods: Systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials (SRCTs) with or without meta-analysis in children (1–18 years) admitted to the emergency department (ED) were retrieved using five data bases. Methodological quality was determined using the AMSTAR tool. Results: One hundred and three studies were retrieved. Among those, 28 SRCTs were included: seven SRCTs related to short-acting beta2-agonists (SABA), three to ipratropium bromide (IB), eight to corticosteroids, one to racemic adrenaline, one to leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), four to magnesium sulfate, one to intravenous (IV) SABA, one to IV aminophylline, one to IV ketamine, and one to antibiotics. It was determined that administering SABA by MDI-VHC is superior to using a nebulizer, because it decreases the hospital admission rate, improves the clinical score, results in a shorter time in the ED, and causes fewer adverse effects. Levalbuterol and albuterol were similar. In patients with moderate to severe exacerbations, IB+SABA was superior to SABA, decreasing hospital admission and improving the clinical score. SABA heliox administered by nebulizer decreased exacerbation severity compared to oxygen. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), especially administered by nebulizer, showed results similar to oral corticosteroids (OCS) with respect to reducing hospital admission, unscheduled visits, and the requirement of additional systemic corticosteroids. ICS or OCS following ED discharge was similar with regard to relapse. Compared with a placebo, IV magnesium reduced hospital admission and improved lung function. Conclusions: SRCTs are useful for guiding decisions in acute asthma treatment.     

Preferential pulmonary retention of (S)-albuterol after inhalation of racemic albuterol.

The (R)-enantiomer of racemic albuterol produces bronchodilation, whereas the (S)-enantiomer may increase airway reactivity. After oral or intravenous administration of racemic albuterol, the (R)- enantiomer is metabolized several times faster than the (S)-enantiomer; however, enantiomer disposition after inhaling racemic albuterol with a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) is not known. Accordingly, 10 healthy subjects inhaled racemic albuterol with a MDI alone and with a MDI and holding chamber. We measured plasma levels of unchanged (R)- and (S)-albuterol before and up to 4 h after inhalation of racemic albuterol, and determined the unchanged R/S ratio in urine before and at 0.5, 4, 8, and 24 h later. The disposition of albuterol's enantiomers with a MDI and holding chamber was similar to that with a MDI alone. The area under the curve (AUC) of the plasma levels over time was significantly lower for the (S)- than for the (R)-enantiomer-395.5 +/- 141.0 (SE) versus 882.7 +/- 126.4 ng. ml(-)(1). min (p < 0.05)-indicating preferential retention of (S)-albuterol in the lung. The R/S ratio in urine at 0. 5 h after albuterol was > 1, reflecting the higher plasma level of the (R)-enantiomer. In conclusion, preferential retention of the (S)- compared with the (R)-enantiomer in the lung could lead to accumulation of the (S)-enantiomer after long-term use of racemic albuterol.     

A randomized controlled trial to assess the optimal dose and effect of nebulized albuterol in acute exacerbations of COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Despite the widespread use of short-acting, inhaled beta(2)-agonists in acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs), little is known about their optimal dose. The aims of this study are to compare the bronchodilator response to incremental doses of inhaled albuterol during and after recovery from an AECOPD, and to compare the effects of regular nebulized albuterol, 2.5 mg and 5 mg, on the speed of recovery. METHODS: Eighty-six patients admitted with an AECOPD were recruited. Each patient was administered incremental doses of inhaled albuterol on hospital admission and following recovery. Dose-response curves were constructed based on FEV(1) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) recorded after each incremental dose. Patients were then randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive 2.5 mg or 5 mg of nebulized albuterol q4h until recovery. Twice-daily PEFR, the number of extra doses of bronchodilators, and side effects reported were recorded. RESULTS: Maximal bronchodilation (Emax) FEV(1) (maximal bronchodilatory response to albuterol) increased from 0.64 +/- 0.27 L/min during the exacerbation to 0.94 +/- 0.38 L/min during recovery (p < 0.001). The Emax PEFR increased from 147.53 +/- 62.46 L/min to 222.94 +/- 73.82 L/min after recovery (p = < 0.001). There was no significant difference in rate of recovery of PEFR (p = 0.684), duration of hospital stay (p = 0.084), or side effects (p = 0.506) between the groups receiving 2.5 mg or 5 mg of nebulized albuterol. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant improvement in Emax to inhaled albuterol as the COPD exacerbation resolved. There was no significant difference in outcomes including length of hospital stay or recovery of lung function between patients treated with regular 2.5 mg vs 5 mg of nebulized albuterol during an AECOPD.     

The combination of ipratropium and albuterol optimizes pulmonary function reversibility testing in patients with COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the combination of ipratropium bromide and albuterol results in greater and more consistent pulmonary function test (PFT) response rates than ipratropium bromide or albuterol alone in patients with COPD. DESIGN: Retrospective review of two recently completed 3-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel, multicenter, phase III trials. SETTING: Outpatient. PATIENTS: A total of 1,067 stable patients with COPD. INTERVENTIONS: Ipratropium bromide (36 microg qid), albuterol base (180 microg qid), or an equivalent combination of ipratropium bromide and albuterol sulfate (42 microg and 240 microg qid, respectively). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: PFT response rates were analyzed using 12% and 15% increases in FEV1 compared with baseline values and were measured in the various treatment groups on days 1, 29, 57, and 85 in these trials. Regardless of whether a 12% or a 15% increase in FEV1 was used to define a positive response, an equivalent combination of ipratropium bromide and albuterol sulfate was superior to the individual agents (p < 0.05; all comparisons within 30 min). In addition, a 15% or more increase in FEV1 was seen in > 80% of patients who received the combination of ipratropium and albuterol sulfate during the initial PFT and continued to be observed 3 months after initial testing. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a combination of ipratropium bromide and albuterol sulfate is superior to the individual agents in identifying PFT reversibility in patients with COPD.