Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous amifostine in minimizing radiation-induced toxicities in patients receiving combined-modality treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

PURPOSE: To report long-term data from a prospective trial of subcutaneous (s.c.) amifostine in patients who received chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients >or=18 years of age with previously untreated Stage III/IV SCCHN received fractionated radiotherapy, 1.8-2.0 Gy/day, 5 days per week, to a total dose of 70-72 Gy, plus weekly paclitaxel (40 mg/m2) and carboplatin (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously (i.v.) for 6 weeks. All patients received 500 mg s.c. amifostine 30-60 min before radiotherapy with antihistamine and antiemetic prophylaxis. RESULTS: Twenty patients were evaluable (median age, 55 years). The incidence of Grade 2 xerostomia was 42% and 29% at 12 and 18 months, respectively; there were no reports of Grade >or=3 xerostomia. Grade >or=3 mucositis occurred in 30% of patients, with median time to resolution of 12.5 weeks (range, 5-17 weeks). Survival estimates at 1 and 2 years were 95% and 71%, respectively. All patients experienced Grade 2 weight loss; 7 patients (35%) experienced Grade /=3 amifostine-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous amifostine was well tolerated by patients receiving chemoradiotherapy for SCCHN, with lower rates of nausea/vomiting than reported in trials with i.v. amifostine. Xerostomia and mucositis rates were similar to those reported in trials with i.v. amifostine.     

A Phase II trial of subcutaneous amifostine and radiation therapy in patients with head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE: Intravenous amifostine 200 mg/m2 reduces xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients. This Phase II study evaluated subcutaneous (s.c.) amifostine in a similar patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received amifostine 500 mg, administered as two 250-mg s.c. injections 60 min before once-daily radiation for head-and-neck cancer (50-70 Gy in 5-7 weeks). The primary endpoint was the incidence of > or =Grade 2 acute xerostomia. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients received s.c. amifostine and radiotherapy. The incidence of > or =Grade 2 acute xerostomia was 56% (95% CI, 43-69%) and the incidence of > or =Grade 2 late xerostomia at 1 year was 45% (95% CI, 29-61%). The incidence of acute xerostomia was lower than reported previously with no amifostine in a controlled study; rates of acute xerostomia were similar between s.c. and i.v. amifostine in the two studies. The rate of late xerostomia with s.c. amifostine was intermediate between rates for i.v. amifostine and no amifostine, and not statistically significantly different from either historical control. Grades 1-2 nausea and emesis were the most common amifostine-related adverse events. Grade 3 amifostine-related adverse events reported by >1 patient included: dehydration (11%); rash (6%); and weight decrease, mucositis, dyspnea, and allergic reaction (each 4%). Seven patients (13%) had serious cutaneous adverse events outside the injection site. One-year rates of locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 78%, 75%, and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous amifostine provides a well-tolerated yet simpler alternative to i.v. amifostine for reducing acute xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients.     

Phase I North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial-N9923 of escalating doses of twice-daily thoracic radiation therapy with amifostine and with alternating chemotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: The primary goal was to identify the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) that can be given with chemotherapy and amifostine for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment began with two cycles of topotecan (1 mg/m(2)) Days 1 to 5 and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) Day 5 (every 3 weeks) given before and after TRT. The TRT began at 6 weeks. The TRT was given in 120 cGy fractions b.i.d. and the dose escalation (from 4,800 cGy, dose level 1, to 6,600 cGy, dose level 4) followed the standard "cohorts of 3" design. The etoposide (E) (50 mg/day) and cisplatin (C) (3 mg/m(2)) were given i.v. before the morning TRT and amifostine (500 mg/day) was given before the afternoon RT. This was followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as Grade > or =4 hematologic, febrile neutropenia, esophagitis, or other nonhematologic toxicity, Grade > or =3 dyspnea, or Grade > or =2 pneumonitis. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were evaluable for the Phase I portion of the trial. No DLTs were seen at dose levels 1 and 2. Two patients on dose level 4 experienced DLTs: 1 patient had a Grade 4 pneumonitis, dyspnea, fatigue, hypokalemia, and anorexia, and 1 patient had a Grade 5 hypoxia attributable to TRT. One of 6 patients on dose level 3 had a DLT, Grade 3 esophagitis. The Grade > or =3 toxicities seen in at least 10% of patients during TRT were esophagitis (53%), leukopenia (33%), dehydration (20%), neutropenia (13%), and fatigue (13%). The median survival was 14.5 months. CONCLUSION: The MTD of b.i.d. TRT was 6000 cGy (120 cGy b.i.d.) with EP and amifostine.     

Phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of weekly cisplatin and irinotecan combined with amifostine for refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This Phase I study was designed primarily to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of irinotecan and cisplatin with and without amifostine in children with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cisplatin, at a fixed dose of 30 mg/m(2), and escalating doses of irinotecan (starting dose, 40 mg/m(2)) were administered weekly for four consecutive weeks, every 6 weeks. After the MTD of irinotecan plus cisplatin was determined, additional cohorts of patients were enrolled with amifostine (825 mg/m(2)) support. Leukocyte DNA-platinum adducts and pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and WR-1065 (amifostine-active metabolite) were also determined. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received 43 courses of therapy. The MTD for irinotecan administered in combination with cisplatin (30 mg/m(2)) was 50 mg/m(2). The DLTs of this combination were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. With the addition of amifostine, at an irinotecan dose of 65 mg/m(2) and cisplatin dose of 30 mg/m(2), the DLT was hypocalcemia. Although no objective responses were observed, six patients received at least three courses of therapy. The amounts of platinum adducts (mean +/- SD) were 10 +/- 20 molecules/10(6) nucleotides. The maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) for free cisplatin and WR-1065 were 4.5 +/- 1.6 micro M and approximately 89 +/- 10 micro M, respectively. The half-life (t(1/2)) for free plasma cisplatin was 25.4 +/- 5.4 min. The initial t(1/2) for plasma WR-1065 was approximately 7 min and terminal t(1/2) approximately 24 min. CONCLUSION: The combination of cisplatin and irinotecan administered weekly for 4 weeks in children with refractory cancer is well tolerated. Amifostine offers some myeloprotection, likely permitting >/=30% dose escalation for irinotecan, when administered in a combination regimen with cisplatin. However, effective antiemetics and calcium supplementation are necessary with the use of amifostine. Further escalation of irinotecan dosing, using these precautions for amifostine administration, may be possible.     

Pilot study of epothilone B analog (BMS-247550) and estramustine phosphate in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer following castration.

BACKGROUND: Several trials have demonstrated that the response proportions to microtubule agents in patients with prostate cancer are increased by the addition of estramustine phosphate (EMP). The epothilone B analog BMS-247550 is a novel microtubule agent that has shown activity in taxane-resistant tumors. We conducted a dose-escalation study to determine a safe dose of BMS-247550 to combine with EMP in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with castrate-metastatic prostate cancer were treated with intravenous BMS-247550 and oral EMP (280 mg three times daily for 5 days) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were treated at two dose levels (35 and 40 mg/m(2)). Three of six patients treated at 40 mg/m(2) developed grade 4 neutropenia, establishing 35 mg/m(2) as the maximum-tolerated dose. Significant peripheral neuropathy (grade >/= 2) was related to dose level and infusion rate. A decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of >/= 50% was seen in 11 of 12 evaluable patients (92%) (95% confidence interval 76% to 100%). There were objective responses in soft tissue (57%) and bone metastasis (40%). CONCLUSIONS: The phase II dose of BMS-247550 combined with EMP is 35 mg/m(2) over 3 h every 3 weeks. This combination is safe and >/= 50% post-therapy declines in PSA were seen in 11 of 12 patients (92%).     

Thoracic radiotherapy and daily vinorelbine as radiosensitizer in locally advanced non small cell lung cancer: a phase I study

Experimental studies have shown that vinorelbine is a powerful radiosensitizer in vitro. To date, no reports on clinical activity of the single agent vinorelbine as radiosensitizer have been published. The aim of the present phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine administered daily concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy, with or without amifostine support, in the treatment of locally advanced non small cell lung cancer. In vitro studies have shown that vinorelbine can potentiate the antitumor effects of radiation therapy. Amifostine is a sulphydril compound that has shown to protect normal tissues from chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced toxicities. Radiotherapy lasted 6 weeks and the total dose was 55 Gy. The daily fraction was 1.8 Gy, administered 5 days a week for 5 weeks and increased to 2.0 Gy during the sixth and last week. Concurrent vinorelbine was administered daily with a planned escalation of the dose from 4, to 5 and 6 mg/m(2). Fourteen patients were enrolled in the study. The first dose of vinorelbine was 4 mg/m(2) and it showed to be feasible without dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Instead, the second dose level of 5 mg/m(2) was unfeasible because three out of six patients had DLT (grade 4 neutropenia, treatment interruption longer than 2 weeks for prolonged grade 2 neutropenia and treatment interruption longer than 2 weeks for prolonged grade 3 esophagitis together with grade 4 dyspnea). At that time, the study continued adding amifostine to vinorelbine in order to increase its MTD. Amifostine was administered by means of subcutaneous injection 15 min before each radiotherapy fraction at the fixed dose of 300 mg/m(2). However, 5 mg/m(2) of vinorelbine were considered unfeasible even with amifostine support because three out of five patients showed DLT (grade 4 neutropenia, febrile grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 liver toxicity). Among 14 patients enrolled in the study, eight completed the planned treatment because six patients experienced DLT, which determined treatment interruption. Overall, four partial and two complete responses were observed. Two partial and one complete response were observed in those three patients who had been treated with the first dose of vinorelbine. In conclusion, our data show that the MTD of daily vinorelbine is 4 mg/m(2). Therefore, this is the recommended dose of daily vinorelbine to be administered with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in a phase II trial. Finally, amifostine administered subcutaneously failed to increase the MTD of daily vinorelbine.     

Dose response of amifostine in protection of growth plate function from irradiation effects

The dose-response radioprotectant effects of amifostine on rat growth plate have not been studied. The purpose is to examine the relative effects of varying doses of amifostine on functional damage to the Sprague-Dawley rat growth plate from a single fraction radiation exposure. Thirty-six weanling Sprague-Dawley rats underwent single dose 17.5 Gy radiation exposure to the right knee. The contralateral left limb served as the nonirradiated control. Six groups of six animals each received, 20 minutes before radiation exposure, intraperitoneally administered amifostine at the following doses: 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mg/kg. Six weeks after treatment, the rats were euthanized and the lower limbs disarticulated, skeletonized, radiographed, and measured. Statistically significant dose-related differences were observed between amifostine dosage groups for mean right-side growth, growth-loss, and limb-length discrepancy. The mean right-side growth recovered by amifostine administration increased from 14% at 50 mg/kg to 57% at 250 mg/kg. Growth-loss and limb discrepency were significantly reduced in proportion to increasing amifostine doses. Despite these positive effects of amifostine, amifostine associated mortality was identifiable beginning at 200 mg/kg and increased rapidly thereafter. This report suggests a directly proportional relationship between amifostine dose and its protective effects on the growth plate. Int. J. Cancer (Radiat. Oncol. Invest.) 90, 73-79 (2000).     

Pilot trial of cytoprotection with amifostine given with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

In an attempt to limit toxicities associated with dose-intensive therapy used for transplant regimens, we performed a pilot study using amifostine with high-dose busulfan (12 mg/kg), melphalan (100 mg/m2), and thiotepa (500 mg/m2) in 21 patients with a variety of malignancies. After 3 days of oral busulfan, amifostine was given at 910 mg/m2 IV for 10 minutes, preceding the infusion of each of 2 doses of melphalan and thiotepa given for 4 days. Antiemetic premedication for amifostine was given to all patients. The median patient age was 50 years (range: 32-65 years). Twenty-one patients received 82 separate amifostine infusions. One patient discontinued amifostine after the second dose because of severe nausea and emesis, and two infusions were temporarily held secondary to hypotension. Of these 82 cycles, there was a total of 37 episodes of nausea/vomiting, 28 episodes of sneezing, 11 episodes of flushing, and 1 episode of oral paresthesia. Systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure decreased by a mean of 8.4 mm Hg and 5.0 mm Hg, respectively. In general, the infusion was well tolerated. Patients were observed until discharge home (N = 15), until initiation of an additional tandem transplant procedure (N = 4), or until death (N = 2). All twenty-one patients experienced nonhematologic toxicities grade II or greater. Grade II toxicities included mucositis (N = 21), gastrointestinal (N = 3), skin (N = 1), and liver (N = 1), and grade III toxicities included liver (N = 1). Mucositis was also scored according to a detailed toxicity assessment. Mucositis did not appear to be improved with amifostine when compared with a control group of patients not receiving amifostine. Renal dysfunction after transplantation was decreased in the amifostine group, whereas there was no significant effect on posttransplant hepatic dysfunction. Although these data demonstrate the feasibility of delivering parenteral amifostine in conjunction with dose-intensive chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, there was no evidence of a significant reduction in nonmarrow toxicities.     

A Phase I/II study of weekly paclitaxel and 3 days of high dose oral estramustine in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and efficacy of weekly 1-hour paclitaxel with 3 days of high dose oral estramustine were evaluated in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. METHODS: Patients enrolled in cohorts of three received two cycles of six weekly treatments with 1 week of rest: Cohort I received paclitaxel 40 mg/m2 and estramustine 600 mg/m2, and Cohorts II-IV received paclitaxel 60 mg/m2, 75 mg/m2, or 90 mg/m2, respectively, and estramustine 900 mg/m2. Toxicity was assessed weekly, and response was measured by serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), abdominal computed tomography scans, and bone scans at Week 13. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled, with 12 in Cohorts III and IV. Four patients did not complete treatment. Grade 3 toxicity included one patient with nausea and diarrhea in Cohort III and one patient each with neutropenia and edema followed by Grade 4 thromboembolism in Cohort IV. Grade 1-2 anemia or myelotoxicity were not observed; 3 patients had neuropathy, 5 patients had hair loss, and 8 patients had gastrointestinal symptoms. A decline in the serum PSA level > or = 50% occurred in none of three patients, one of three patients, four of six patients, and four of six patients in Cohorts I-IV, respectively. An intent-to-treat analysis showed responses in 9 of 18 patients (50%) in Cohorts I-IV, with 9 of 15 responders (60%) in Cohorts II-IV. Seven patients achieved declines in serum PSA levels > 75%. The median duration of PSA response was 16.7 weeks. Response was observed in one of three patients with measurable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD for 1-hour weekly paclitaxel was 90 mg/m2 with 3 days of 900 mg/m2 estramustine. Hematologic and neurotoxicity were reduced markedly, and gastrointestinal symptoms were ameliorated, but thromboembolic events were unaffected. PSA response rates were within the expected 60% range for these agents.     

Randomized double-blind trial of combined modality treatment with or without amifostine in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Greater toxicities have been recognized to be a consequence of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was designed to determine if the use of amifostine could reduce treatment-related toxicities associated with the use of paclitaxel plus carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC were treated with two cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin (area under the time-concentration curve = 6), followed by thoracic radiotherapy (64 Gy) with concurrent weekly paclitaxel 60 mg/m2. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 740 mg/m2 of amifostine (arm A) or placebo (arm B) before each dose of paclitaxel and carboplatin. Treatment-related toxicities were evaluated at each visit and nerve conduction tests were performed before and after treatment for the objective assessment of neurotoxicity. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between arms A and B in grade 3 to 4 neutropenia. In all 72 neurophysiological parameters measured, there was no significant difference between the two treatment arms, although there was a trend toward fewer patients showing deterioration in arm A for six of the parameters. Grade 2 to 3 esophagitis occurred in 43% of patients in arm A and in 70% of patients in arm B. The difference of -27% (95% confidence limit = -50%, 0.4%) was not statistically significant. Response rates and survival were also not significantly different between the two arms. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with amifostine showed a trend toward reducing the severity of esophagitis associated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but it did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant protective effect on hematologic or neurologic toxicities induced by paclitaxel and carboplatin.     

Platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibitor imatinib mesylate and docetaxel: a modular phase I trial in androgen-independent prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To study the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) inhibitor imatinib mesylate in androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC), alone and in combination with docetaxel, we designed a modular phase I trial. Our goals were to (1) evaluate the toxicity and maximum-tolerated dose of docetaxel with imatinib, and (2) evaluate the decline of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) induced by imatinib alone, and imatinib and docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight men with AIPC and bone metastases were enrolled to receive imatinib 600 mg daily lead-in for 30 days, then imatinib 600 mg daily and one of six possible doses of docetaxel weekly for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. RESULTS: During the imatinib lead-in module, one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) event was observed, while two (7%) of 28 had PSA decline (both < 50%). With imatinib and docetaxel, cycle 1 DLT was found in three of 12 patients at docetaxel 30 mg/m(2), in three of four patients at docetaxel 45 mg/m(2), and in five of six patients at docetaxel 35 mg/m(2). DLTs (n = 40 total events) were principally fatigue (35%) and nausea (20%). Eight (38%) of 21 had PSA decline greater than 50%, and six (29%) of 21 had PSA decline less than 50%. Serial PSA declines beyond 18 months were observed. PDGFR-expressing tumor declined on serial bone marrow biopsies with combination therapy alone. CONCLUSION: With imatinib 600 mg daily, the maximum-tolerated dose of docetaxel was determined to be 30 mg/m(2) weekly for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. Long-term responses were observed. The role of imatinib in modulating outcomes to docetaxel in AIPC is being tested in a randomized phase II trial.     

Influence of intravenous amifostine on xerostomia, tumor control, and survival after radiotherapy for head-and- neck cancer: 2-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized, phase III trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate chronic xerostomia and tumor control 18 and 24 months after initial treatment with amifostine in a randomized controlled trial of patients with head-and-neck cancer; at 12 months after radiotherapy (RT), amifostine had been shown to reduce xerostomia without changing tumor control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adults with head-and-neck cancer who underwent once-daily RT for 5-7 weeks (total dose, 50-70 Gy) received either open-label amifostine (200 mg/m2 i.v.) 15-30 min before each fraction of radiation (n = 150) or RT alone (control; n = 153). RESULTS: Amifostine administration was associated with a reduced incidence of Grade > or =2 xerostomia over 2 years of follow-up (p = 0.002), an increase in the proportion of patients with meaningful (>0.1 g) unstimulated saliva production at 24 months (p = 0.011), and reduced mouth dryness scores on a patient benefit questionnaire at 24 months (p < 0.001). Locoregional control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were not significantly different between the amifostine group and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Amifostine administration during head-and-neck RT reduces the severity and duration of xerostomia 2 years after treatment and does not seem to compromise locoregional control rates, progression-free survival, or overall survival.     

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetics of escalating doses of paclitaxel and concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy with or without amifostine in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Amifostine was developed to protect normal tissues from radiation exposure. The current study was undertaken to determine whether amifostine would allow the delivery of greater numbers of weekly paclitaxel treatments with concomitant, hyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma. METHODS: Patients received radiation therapy twice daily using 1.6-gray (Gy) fractions up to a total of 70.4 Gy over an elapsed time of 6.5 weeks. All patients received paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2) once weekly starting on Day 1. The number of doses of paclitaxel was escalated from three to a maximum of six in groups of three patients. For the patients who received amifostine, a dose of 400 mg/m(2) was given intravenously over 15 minutes on Days 1-5, 8, 29-33, and 36. Patients underwent surgery for persistent tumor after radiotherapy. The plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel were characterized during treatment with the first weekly dose to determine the effect of concurrently administered amifostine. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were evaluable for this study. In the absence of amifostine, a maximum of four doses of paclitaxel were tolerated in combination with the radiotherapy. With amifostine, up to five doses of paclitaxel could be given. Generally, the treatment resulted in Grade 2 and 3 stomatitis. Overall, 69% of patients had a complete remission, and 29% had a partial remission. Both progression-free survival and overall survival were 66% at 30 months. Amifostine had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of amifostine allowed the authors to give an additional dose of paclitaxel to patients who were undergoing hyperfractionated radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma. This treatment regimen resulted in a high frequency of complete remissions and an excellent progression-free survival pattern without compromising the plasma kinetics of paclitaxel.     

A phase I trial of ispinesib, a kinesin spindle protein inhibitor, with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours

The aim of this study is to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs) and efficacy of ispinesib (SB-715992) in combination with docetaxel. Patients with advanced solid tumours were treated with ispinesib (6-12 mg m(-2)) and docetaxel (50-75 mg m(-2)). Docetaxel was administered over 1 h followed by a 1-h infusion of ispinesib on day 1 of a 21-day schedule. At least three patients were treated at each dose level. Blood samples were collected during cycle 1 for PK analysis. Clinical response assessments were performed every two cycles using RECIST guidelines. Twenty-four patients were treated at four dose levels. Prolonged neutropaenia and febrile neutropaenia were dose limiting in six and two patients, respectively. The MTD was ispinesib 10 mg m(-2) with docetaxel 60 mg m(-2). Pharmacokinetic assessment demonstrated concentrations of ispinesib and docetaxel, consistent with published data from single agent studies of the drugs. Seven patients (six hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), one renal cancer) had a best response of stable disease (>or=18 weeks). One patient with HRPC had a confirmed >50% prostatic-specific antigen decrease. The MTD for ispinesib and docetaxel was defined and the combination demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile. Preliminary PK data suggest no interaction between ispinesib and docetaxel.     

Protective effect of amifostine during fractionated radiotherapy in patients with pelvic carcinomas: results of a randomized trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether pretreatment with amifostine can reduce treatment-induced toxicity in patients with pelvic malignancies undergoing radiotherapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 205 patients with pelvic malignancies (rectal, 32; bladder, 47; prostate, 40; gynecologic, 86) were randomized to receive RT (Group 1, n = 95) or RT plus amifostine (Group 2, n = 110). The patient characteristics for both treatment groups were well balanced. Amifostine was administered at 340 mg/m(2) i.v., 15 min before RT, with standard antiemetics 30 min before. All patients received conventional RT, radical (65-70 Gy) or postoperative (50 Gy), with 45 Gy given to the whole pelvis at daily fractions of 1.8-2.0 Gy, 5 d/wk. Skin, bowel, bladder, and hematologic toxicities were evaluated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring system. RESULTS: A significant reduction occurred in acute Grade 2-3 bladder and lower GI tract toxicities in the amifostine group (p <0.05, Weeks 3-7). With a median follow-up of 12 months, few late Grade 2-3 effects were observed in either group. No statistically significant difference between the two groups was observed in terms of response 6 weeks after RT completion (complete response plus partial response, 96.8% in the control and 98.3% in the amifostine arm). Amifostine was well tolerated, with only moderate hypotension occurring in 2 patients and moderate nausea in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this randomized trial support the role of amifostine in reducing acute radiation-related toxicity of the bladder and lower GI tract in patients with pelvic malignancies, without evidence of tumor protection.     

Phase I studies of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor chimeric antibody C225 alone and in combination with cisplatin.

PURPOSE: The epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor is frequently overexpressed in epithelial tumors. C225 is a human-to-murine chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds to the receptor and inhibits growth of cancer cells expressing the receptor. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of C225 in patients with advanced tumors overexpressing EGF receptors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 52 patients in three successive phase I clinical trials of C225 as a single dose (n = 13), weekly multiple dose (n = 17), and weekly multiple dose with cisplatin (n = 22). C225 dose levels were 5, 20, 50, and 100 mg/m(2). In the study combining C225 with cisplatin, limited to patients with either head and neck or non-small-cell lung cancer, C225 was further escalated to 200 and 400 mg/m(2). Cisplatin was given at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) once every 4 weeks, and treatment was continued for up to 12 weeks if no disease progression occurred. RESULTS: C225 displayed nonlinear pharmacokinetics, with antibody doses in the range of 200 to 400 mg/m(2) being associated with complete saturation of systemic clearance. C225 clearance did not change with repeated administration or with coadministration of cisplatin. Antibodies against C225 were detected in only one patient, and C225-associated toxicity was minimal. Patients experiencing disease stabilization were seen in all studies. In the study combining C225 and cisplatin, nine (69%) of 13 patients treated with antibody doses >/= 50 mg/m(2) completed 12 weeks of therapy, and two partial responses were observed. CONCLUSION: C225 has dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, and doses that achieve saturation of systemic clearance are well tolerated. C225 given in combination with cisplatin has biologic activity at pharmacologically relevant doses.     

Amifostine alone and in combination with erythropoietin for the treatment of favorable myelodysplastic syndrome

Ten anemic patients with favorable myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were first treated with two 5-week courses of amifostine alone (each course consisted of 200 mg/m(2) of the drug given intravenously three times a week for 3 weeks), followed by an additional two courses combined with subcutaneous erythropoietin (EPO) (150 U/kg, three times a week for 8 weeks). The study patients either had previously failed to respond to treatment with EPO or had pretreatment serum EPO levels of more than 100 mU/ml. None of the patients experienced a complete or partial response in anemia or other cytopenias. We conclude that amifostine alone or in combination with EPO has limited therapeutic activity in MDS.     

Phase I trial of docetaxel with estramustine in androgen-independent prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of docetaxel when combined with oral estramustine and dexamethasone in a phase I study in patients with progressive metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four men were stratified into minimally pretreated (MPT) and extensively pretreated (EPT) groups. Estramustine 280 mg PO tid was administered 1 hour before or 2 hours after meals on days 1 through 5, with escalated doses of docetaxel from 40 to 80 mg/m2 on day 2. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were assessable for toxicity and 33 for response. In the MPT patients, dose-limiting myelosuppression was reached at 80 mg/m2, with six patients experiencing grade 3/4 granulocytopenia. In EPT patients, escalation above 70 mg/m2 was not attempted. Fourteen MPT (70%) and six EPT (50%) patients had a > or = 50% decline in serum PSA on two consecutive measurements taken at least 2 weeks apart. The overall 50% PSA response rate was 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28% to 81%). Of the 18 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, five (28%; 95% CI, 11% to 54%) achieved a partial response. At the time of entry onto the study, 15 patients required narcotic analgesics for bone pain; after treatment, eight (53%) discontinued their pain medications. The area under the curve for docetaxel increased linearly from 40 to 70 mg/m2. At 80 mg/m2, the measured area under the curve was 8.37 (standard deviation, 0.724), which was significantly higher than the previously reported values. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II dose of docetaxel combined with estramustine is 70 mg/m2 in MPT patients and 60 mg/m2 in EPT patients. This combination is active in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer.     

A randomized trial of amifostine in patients with high-dose VIC chemotherapy plus autologous blood stem cell transplantation

This pilot study evaluates the degree of side effects during high-dose chemotherapy (HD-VIC) plus autologous bone marrow transplant (HDCT) and its possible prevention by the cytoprotective thiol-derivate amifostine. Additionally, the in-patient medical costs of both treatment arms were compared. 40 patients with solid tumours were randomized to receive HD-VIC chemotherapy with or without amifostine (910 mg/m(2)at day 1-3) given as a short infusion prior to carboplatin and ifosfamide. Patients were stratified according to pretreatment. HDCT consisted of an 18 h infusion of carboplatin (500 mg/m(2/)d over 18 h), ifosfamide (4 g/m(2)/d over 4 h) and etoposide (500 mg/m(2)/d) all given for 3 consecutive days. All patients received prophylactic application of G-CSF (5 microg kg(-1)subcutaneously) to ameliorate neutropenia after treatment. Patients were monitored for nephrotoxicity, gastrointestinal side effects, haematopoietic recovery, as well as frequency of fever and infections. The median fall of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 10% from baseline in the amifostine group (105 to 95 ml min(-1)) and 37% in the control patient group (107 to 67 ml min(-1)) (P< 0.01). Amifostine-treated patients revealed a less pronounced increase in albumin and low molecular weight protein urinary excretion. Stomatitis grade III/IV occurred in 25% without versus 0% of patients with amifostine (P = 0.01). Acute nausea/vomiting was frequently observed immediately during or after the application of amifostine despite intensive antiemetic prophylaxis consisting of 5-HT3-receptor antagonists/dexamethasone/trifluorpromazine. However, delayed emesis occurred more often in the control patients. Engraftment of neutrophil (> 500 microl(-1))and thrombocytes (> 25 000 microl(-1))were observed at days 9 versus 10 and 10 versus 12, respectively, both slightly in favour of the amifostine arm. In addition, a lower number of days with fever and a shortened duration of hospital stay were observed in the amifostine arm. The reduction of acute toxicity observed in the amifostine arm resulted in 30% savings in costs for supportive care (Euro 4396 versus Euro 3153 per patient). Taking into account the drug costs of amifostine, calculation of in-patient treatment costs from the start of chemotherapy to discharge revealed additional costs of Euro 540 per patient in the amifostine arm. This randomized pilot study indicates that both organ and haematotoxicity of HD-VIC chemotherapy can be ameliorated by the use of amifostine. Additionally, a nearly complete preservation of GFR was observed in amifostine-treated patients which may be advantageous if repetitive cycles of HDCT are planned. Larger randomized trials evaluating amifostine cytoprotection during high-dose chemotherapy are warranted.     

Effect of amifostine on toxicities associated with radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: Radiochemotherapy (RCT) is an effective treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but can be limited by acute and late toxicities (esophagitis, pneumonitis, and myelosuppression). This trial investigated whether pretreatment with amifostine, a radioprotector, could reduce the incidence of radiochemotherapy-induced acute and late toxicities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between October 1997 and August 1999, 73 patients with previously untreated Stage IIIa-IIIb NSCLC were randomized to treatment with RCT alone (n = 36) or RCT plus amifostine (300 mg/m(2) daily i.v. infusion, n = 37). RCT consisted of either paclitaxel (60 mg/m(2)) or carboplatin (AUC 2) once weekly during a 5- to 6-week course of conventional radiotherapy given as 2 Gy/5 days/week to a total dose of 55 to 60 Gy. Blood cell counts were measured weekly; esophagitis and acute lung toxicity were evaluated during the treatment course. Treatment efficacy was assessed following World Health Organization criteria for response. Late lung toxicity was assessed at 3 and 6 months after RCT and was graded from 0 to 4 according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were evaluable for toxicity analysis (RCT group, n = 32; RCT + amifostine, n = 36). There was no significant difference between treatment arms in patient baseline characteristics. The incidence of Grade >or=3 esophagitis during RCT was significantly lower for patients receiving amifostine than for patients receiving RCT alone (38.9% vs. 84.4%%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the incidence of Grade >or=3 acute pulmonary toxicity was significantly reduced in patients treated with RCT plus amifostine compared to patients who received RCT alone (19.4% vs. 56.3%, p = 0.002). At 3 months after RCT, patients treated with amifostine had a significantly lower incidence of pneumonitis than patients who received RCT alone (p = 0.009). Combined response rates (complete plus partial responses) were 82.2% in the RCT group and 88.8% in the RCT plus amifostine group (p = 0.498).Amifostine is effective in reducing the incidence of both acute and late toxicities associated with RCT in patients with locally advanced NSCLC without compromising antitumor efficacy.