The addition of chemoradiation to adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in lymph node-positive gastric cancer

BackgroundIn the ARTIST trial, chemoradiation did not improve disease-free survival (DFS) in gastric cancer patients treated with curative-intent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis suggested chemoradiation improved DFS in patients with lymph node (LN) metastases, but the role of adjuvant chemoradiation remains uncertain. This study sought to determine the role of adjuvant chemoradiation using population-based methods.MethodsSurveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked data from 2004 to 2013 was used to identify patients aged 66 and older with LN-positive gastric adenocarcinoma. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated factors associated with receipt of chemoradiation. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to evaluate overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 2409 patients with LN-positive gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent upfront surgical resection were identified; 309 (13%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and 407 (17%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation. Among all patients, median OS was 15 months. Median OS was 20 months for patients who received chemotherapy alone and 27 months for patients who received chemotherapy and chemoradiation (p < 0.05). Recent diagnosis, older age, tumor stage T3 or T4, and Charleston Comorbidity Index were associated with an increased hazard ratio for death (p < 0.05). Receipt of chemoradiation was associated with a decreased hazard ratio for death (p < 0.05).ConclusionsIn patients with LN-positive gastric adenocarcinoma, the addition of chemoradiation to adjuvant chemotherapy after upfront surgical resection was associated with improved survival irrespective of the extent of lymphadenectomy. These data suggest chemoradiation should be considered in patients with LN-positive gastric adenocarcinoma.     

Long-term oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in high-risk endometrial cancer

BackgroundSeveral studies showed that women with low-risk endometrial cancers staged by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) experience fewer postoperative complications compared to those staged by laparotomy with similar disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). However, high-risk patients were poorly represented. In this study, we compared DFS and OS in high-risk endometrial cancer patients who underwent surgical staging via MIS versus laparotomy.MethodsUsing a multicentric database, we compared DFS and OS between 114 patients with high-risk histology who underwent surgical staging via MIS and 114 patients who underwent laparotomy. Patients were matched for age, tumour type, FIGO stage and management criteria.ResultsAmong the 114 patients who underwent MIS, 93 underwent laparoscopy and 21 robotic surgery. Groups were comparable for stage, body mass index, histology and adjuvant therapies. However, patients in the MIS group underwent paraaortic lymphadenectomy less frequently (13% versus 29%; p = 0.01), had less lymph nodes removed (19.0 versus 28.6; p < 0.01) and had lower mean tumour size (30 versus 40 mm; p < 0.01). With a median follow-up time of 49 months, DFS and OS were not significantly different between the surgical cohorts. In multivariable analysis, both higher stage (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.2) and histology (HR = 4.9) were associated with DFS in contrast to surgical procedure (HR = 0.9).ConclusionsBeyond the benefit of MIS on immediate surgical outcome, our results show that fear for a poor long-term outcome should not be the reason to refrain from MIS in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer.     

Neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis

BackgroundChemotherapy is frequently used in cholangiocarcinoma as an adjunct to surgical resection, but the appropriate sequence of chemotherapy with surgery is unclear.Patients and methodsUsing the National Cancer Database, we identified patients who underwent surgery and chemotherapy for stage I-III cholangiocarcinoma between 2006 and 2014. The propensity score reflecting the probability of receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy was estimated by multivariate logistic regression method. Patients in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy study arms were then propensity-matched in 1:3 ratios using the nearest neighbor method. Overall Survival (OS) in the matched data set was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard regression model.ResultsOf the 1450 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 299 (20.6%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy while 1151 (79.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median age at diagnosis was 63 years. 278 patients in the neoadjuvant group were matched to 700 patients in the adjuvant group. In the matched cohort, patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a superior OS compared to those who received adjuvant chemotherapy (Median OS: 40.3 vs. 32.8 months; HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64–0.94, p = 0.01). The 1- and 5-year OS rates for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group were 85.8% and 42.5% respectively compared to 84.6% and 31.7% for the adjuvant chemotherapy group.ConclusionIn this large national database study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a longer OS in a select group of patients with cholangiocarcinoma compared to those who underwent upfront surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Surrogate end-points for overall survival in 22 neoadjuvant trials of gastro-oesophageal cancers

BackgroundThe surrogacy between disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) has been evaluated in patients with gastric cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Similar analyses in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) or chemotherapy (CT) for gastro-oesophageal (GE) cancer have not yet been performed.MethodsWe evaluated the correlation between DFS and pathologic complete response (pCR) with OS in patients with GE carcinomas enrolled in randomised studies. A weighted linear regression analysis was used to evaluate surrogacy. Correlations were evaluated by squared correlation R². Surrogacy of DFS and pCR with OS was assessed through the correlation between end-points and OS (individual-level surrogacy), and between the treatment effects on the end-points (trial-level surrogacy). Correlations were weighted by the number of patients in the intent-to-treat population.ResultsTwenty-two trials were included for a total of 4749 patients that received CTRT or CT for gastric or oesophageal cancers. Treatment effect on surrogates did not correlate with treatment effect on OS (R² = 0.27, and R² = 0.17, for DFS and pCR) at the trial level. In subgroup analysis surrogacy of DFS did not vary according to histology or treatment modality but was good in gastric cancer and poor in oesophageal cancers.ConclusionsDFS and pCR did not correlate with OS, and should not be used as surrogate end-points in patients with GE cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy. OS should still represent the primary end-point to compare treatments in future randomised clinical trials.     

Improvement of survival after surgical resection of pancreatic cancer independent of adjuvant chemotherapy in the past two decades – A meta-regression

IntroductionSurgical resection improves survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy adds an additional survival-benefit. While surgical technique has improved in recent years, it remains unclear whether these improvements translate into a survival benefit independent of adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, we aimed to clarify whether survival of patients who were treated with either Gemcitabine (GEM) or who were observed only in randomized controlled trials on adjuvant chemotherapy of PDAC improved over time.MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed was performed to identify randomized controlled trials on adjuvant chemotherapy of PDAC. The search was limited to studies with arms on GEM monotherapy or postoperative observation and studies were grouped by the median year of enrolment and the use of GEM. Subsequently, a meta-regression on the effect of the median year of enrolment on patient survival was performed.ResultsA total of 13 studies with 2469 patients was included, with median years of enrollment ranging from 1996 to 2015. While disease-free survival decreased in patients with postoperative observation (18.0 vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.001), median survival improved over time in patients with postoperative observation (15.8 vs. 18.4 months, p = 0.01) and in patients treated with adjuvant GEM (22.8 vs. 35.0 months, p < 0.001). One- (p ≤ 0.01) and two-year survival (p = 0.056) improved in both patients treated with adjuvant GEM and those observed only.ConclusionSurvival after surgical resection of PDAC has improved since 1996, even in patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Improved surgical technique and postoperative management are likely to be causative factors.     

Improved Outcomes with Modern Lung-Sparing Trimodality Therapy in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

IntroductionHigher target conformity and better sparing of organs at risk with modern radiotherapy (RT) may result in higher tumor control and less toxicity. In this study, we compare our institutional multimodality therapy experience of adjuvant chemotherapy and hemithoracic intensity-modulated pleural RT (IMPRINT) with previously used adjuvant conventional RT (CONV) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) treated with lung-sparing pleurectomy/decortication (P/D).MethodsWe analyzed 209 patients who underwent P/D and adjuvant RT (131 who received CONV and 78 who received IMPRINT) for MPM between 1974 and 2015. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to calculate OS; competing risks analysis was performed for local failure-free survival and progression-free survival. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed with relevant clinical and treatment factors.ResultsThe median age was 64 years, and 80% of the patients were male. Patients receiving IMPRINT had significantly higher rates of the epithelial histological type, advanced pathological stage, and chemotherapy treatment. OS was significantly higher after IMPRINT (median 20.2 versus 12.3 months, p = 0.001). Higher Karnofsky performance score, epithelioid histological type, macroscopically complete resection, and use of chemotherapy/IMPRINT were found to be significant factors for longer OS in multivariate analysis. No significant predictive factors were identified for local failure or progression. Grade 2 or higher esophagitis developed in fewer patients after IMPRINT than after CONV (23% versus 47%).ConclusionsTrimodality therapy including adjuvant hemithoracic IMPRINT, chemotherapy, and P/D is associated with promising OS rates and decreased toxicity in patients with MPM. Dose constraints should be applied vigilantly to minimize serious adverse events.     

Prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with clinical T4 gastric cancer

IntroductionPatients with clinical T4 gastric cancers have high recurrence rates and low 5-year overall survival (OS) despite radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. The invisible peritoneal metastasis may result in local recurrence due to the tumor invading the serosa and nearby organs. Prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been suggested as an adjuvant treatment strategy in these patients. We evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic HIPEC post-gastrectomy for patients with clinical T4 gastric cancer.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from 132 patients with clinical T4 gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy + D2 lymphadenectomy between 2014 and 2020. Thirty-five of these patients also underwent prophylactic HIPEC perioperatively. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce selection bias. We evaluated the risk factors for recurrence and compared the OS and disease-free survival (DFS) between the gastrectomy and prophylactic HIPEC groups.ResultsA total of 132 eligible patients were included in the study. Seventy preoperative patient characteristics were homogeneous post-PSM. Prophylactic HIPEC seemed to reduce the risk of postoperative peritoneal recurrence but did not influence the risk of distant metastasis. The risk factors for recurrence included advanced N stage, ascites, and lymphovascular invasion. OS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.81; p = 0.035) and DFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.72; p = 0.017) were better in the prophylactic HIPEC group than in the gastrectomy alone group.ConclusionsProphylactic HIPEC plus radical gastrectomy can reduce peritoneal recurrence and improve OS and DFS in patients with clinical T4 gastric cancer.     

Capecitabine in early breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

PurposeCapecitabine is an effective therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Its role in early breast cancer is uncertain due to conflicting data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsPubMed and major conference proceedings were searched to identify RCTs comparing standard chemotherapy with or without capecitabine in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. Hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as odds ratios (ORs) for toxicities were extracted or calculated and pooled in a meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis compared triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to non-TNBC and whether capecitabine was given in addition to or in place of standard chemotherapy. Meta-regression was used to explore the influence of TNBC on OS.ResultsEight studies comprising 9302 patients were included. In unselected patients, capecitabine did not influence DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, p = 0.93) or OS (HR 0.90, p = 0.36). There was a significant difference in DFS when capecitabine was given in addition to standard treatment compared with in place of standard treatment (HR 0.92 versus 1.62, interaction p = 0.002). Addition of capecitabine to standard chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved DFS in TNBC versus non-TNBC (HR 0.72 versus 1.01, interaction p = 0.02). Meta-regression showed that adding capecitabine to standard chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in studies with higher proportions of patients with TNBC (R = −0.967, p = 0.007). Capecitabine increased grade 3/4 diarrhoea (odds ratio [OR] 2.33, p < 0.001) and hand-foot syndrome (OR 8.08, p < 0.001), and resulted in more frequent treatment discontinuation (OR 3.80, p < 0.001).ConclusionAdding capecitabine to standard chemotherapy appears to improve DFS and OS in TNBC, but increases adverse events in keeping with its known toxicity profile.     

Upfront surgery or definitive radiotherapy for p16+ oropharyngeal cancer. A GETTEC multicentric study

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of the initial therapeutic strategy on oncologic outcomes in patients with HPV-positive OPSCC.MethodsAll p16-positive OPSCCs treated from 2009 to 2014 in 7 centers were retrospectively included and classified according to the therapeutic strategy: surgical strategy (surgery ± adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy) vs. non-surgical strategy (definitive radiotherapy ± chemotherapy). Univariate, multivariate propensity score matching analyses were performed to compare overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).Results382 patients were included (surgical group: 144; non-surgical group: 238). Five-year OS, DSS and RFS were 89.2, 96.8 and 83.9% in the surgical group and 84.2, 87.1 and 70.4% in the non-surgical group, respectively. These differences were statistically significant for DSS and RFS after multivariate analysis, but only for RFS after propensity score matching analysis.ConclusionIn p16+ OPSCC patients, upfront surgery results in higher RFS than definitive radiotherapy ± chemotherapy but does not impact OS.     

Real-World Outcomes of Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy on R0 Resected Colonic Liver Metastasis

IntroductionIn resected colonic liver metastasis (CLM), randomized studies of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy have demonstrated improvements in disease-free survival (DFS), but not overall survival (OS). Additionally, oxaliplatin regimens have not been compared to non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy. Despite limited evidence, perioperative chemotherapy is often used in the management of CLM. The primary aim of this study was to assess the impact of oxaliplatin chemotherapy regimens on OS in patients who have undergone resection of CLM in a real-world setting.Patients and MethodsPatients who underwent resection of CLM in the provinces of Alberta and British Columbia, Canada, were identified from 1996 to 2016. Perioperative (pre- and/or post-) systemic therapy was categorized as oxaliplatin or non-oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy or no chemotherapy. The primary and secondary outcomes were OS and DFS, respectively.ResultsWe identified 511 patients who underwent R0 resection of CLM. A significant difference in median OS was identified among the oxaliplatin, non-oxaliplatin, and no-chemotherapy groups of 100, 60, and 59 months, respectively (P = .009). In multivariate analysis, patients who received oxaliplatin regimens had a lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.92; P = .012), whereas the non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy group did not (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.20; P = .422) compared with no chemotherapy.ConclusionsIn this multicenter, retrospective, population-based study, perioperative oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in conjunction with R0 resection of CLM. Further studies should evaluate the optimal duration and sequencing of perioperative chemotherapy in relation to curative-intent surgical resection of CLM.     

Upfront surgery or definitive radiotherapy for patients with p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. A GETTEC multicentric study

IntroductionTherapeutic management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) is still debated. Since the role of HPV was demonstrated, few studies have focused on HPV-negative OPSCC. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of therapeutic strategy (surgical vs. non-surgical) on oncologic outcomes in patients with HPV-negative OPSCC.Material and methodAll p16-negative OPSCCs treated from 2009 to 2014 in 7 tertiary-care centers were included in this retrospective study and were classified according to the therapeutic strategy: surgical strategy (surgery ± adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy) vs. non-surgical strategy (definitive radiotherapy ± chemotherapy). Patients not eligible for surgery (unresectable tumor, poor general-health status) were excluded. Univariate, multivariate and propensity score matching analyses were performed to compare overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).ResultsFour hundred seventy-four (474) patients were included in the study (surgical group: 196; non-surgical group: 278). Five-year OS, DSS and RFS were 76.5, 81.3 and 61.3%, respectively, in the surgical group and 49.9, 61.8 and 43.4%, respectively, in the non-surgical group. The favorable impact of primary surgical treatment on oncologic outcomes was statistically significant after multivariate analysis. This effect was more marked for locally-advanced than for early-stage tumors. Propensity score matching analysis confirmed the prognostic impact of primary surgical treatment for RFS.ConclusionTherapeutic strategy is an independent prognostic factor in patients with p16-negative OPSCC and primary surgical treatment is associated with improved OS, DSS and RFS. These results suggest that surgical strategy is a reliable option for advanced stage OPSCC.     

Determining the role of adjuvant therapy in Invasive Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms; a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundConflicting evidence exists regarding the role of adjuvant therapy for Invasive Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (i-IPMN). This meta-analysis assessed whether adjuvant therapy improves Overall Survival (OS) in patients with resected i-IPMN.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was the effect of adjuvant therapy on OS. Secondary endpoint evaluated adjuvant therapy with regard to nodal disease, positive resection margins, tumour grade and differentiation. A meta-analysis of pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with an inverse variance and a random-effects model was performed. Risk of bias was determined with the GRADE approach and MINORS criteria.ResultsTen articles with a total of 3252 patients were included. No statistically significant difference in the OS was noted with adjuvant therapy for i-IPMN in the entire cohort (HR = 1; 95% CI = 0.75–1.35; P = 0.98). However, a survival benefit was noted in a subgroup of patients with an aggressive disease phenotype; nodal involvement (HR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.39–0.79; P = 0.001) and advanced staged tumours (≥stage 2, HR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.11–1.82; P = 0.005)ConclusionsThe concurrent evidence base for adjuvant therapy for i-IPMN is limited. After acknowledging the limitations of the data, the current literature suggests that adjuvant therapy should be reserved for patients with resected i-IPMN that have adverse tumour biology.     

Daily practice in guideline adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer and predictors of outcome

IntroductionAlthough guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer patients, many patients do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to identify reasons for guideline non-adherence and assess the effect on patient outcomes in a multicenter cohort of stage III colon cancer patients who received surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone.MethodsPatients who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2017 were included. Reasons for non-adherence were determined. Propensity score analyses with inverse probability weighting were performed to adjust for confounding factors. Cox proportional hazards regression and risk stratified analyses were performed to assess the association of guideline adherence and other potential predictors with recurrence free survival (RFS).ResultsData of 575 patients were included of whom 61% received adjuvant chemotherapy. In 87 of 222 patients (39%) who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, no reason was documented. Only age was predictive for receiving chemotherapy. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had longer RFS (HR 0.42, 95%CI 0.29–0.62, p < 0.001). High T- and N-stage were associated with poorer RFS HR 2.0 (95%CI 1.58–2.71, p < 0.001) and HR 2.19 (95%CI 1.60–2.99, p < 0.001) respectively. Risk groups were identified with distinct prognosis and treatment effect and a nomogram is presented to visualize individualized RFS differences.ConclusionThis study shows considerable variation in guideline adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy and poor documentation on reasons for non-adherence. Optimizing adherence and gaining insight in reasons for non-adherence is advocated as this can lead to significant RFS benefit, especially in patients with high T-and N-stage tumors.     

Renal Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor With Inferior Vena Cava Thrombus: Case Series and Literature Review of a Rare but Challenging Entity

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and prognosis of patients with renal primitive neuroectodermal ectodermal tumors (rPNETs) with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 6 patients with rPNETs and IVC tumor thrombus between January 2005 and December 2019, and identified 39 published cases through a literature review. The clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and survival data were analyzed.ResultsThe median patient age patients was 26 years, and the male to female ratio was approximately 1:1. The average tumor diameter was 12.5 cm. Seventeen patients (37.8%) showed metastasis at diagnosis. Forty-three cases (95.6%) were managed with surgical resection, and 35 (77.8%) received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Follow-up data were available for 41 patients (median follow-up, 10 months; range, 4.5-13.0). The median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were both 30.0 months. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had better PFS than those who underwent surgery only (30.0 months [95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-55.7] vs 5.0 months [95% CI, 1.0-9.0]; P = .036). In terms of OS, however, the difference between the 2 groups was not significant (30.0 months [95% CI, 8.4-52.6] vs 7.0 months [95% CI, 4.5-9.5]; P = .244).ConclusionsrPNET with IVCTT is an extremely rare entity that mostly occurs in young adults. Although multidisciplinary treatment is used, the prognosis of this disease remains unclear. RN with IVC tumor thrombectomy is a challenging procedure requiring vascular management techniques and experience. Adjuvant chemotherapy contributes to improved PFS, but not OS. Thus, early diagnosis and treatment play a key role in improving prognosis.     

Prognostic and predictive value of epigenetic silencing of MGMT in patients with high grade gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Epigenetic silencing of the O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene is associated with improved survival in patients with high-grade gliomas (HGG), with varying estimates of magnitude. The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine the prognostic value of MGMT silencing, and assess its predictive value by treatment type. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies relating to gliomas and MGMT. Studies reporting overall survival (OS) by MGMT status in patients with HGG were considered potentially eligible. We excluded studies that did not control for potential confounding variables. A meta-analysis of studies was performed via random-effects modelling. Subgroup meta-analyses by treatment were performed according to a priori hypotheses. Twenty studies were ultimately eligible, including 2,018 patients. In the pooled analysis, MGMT silencing was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.436; 95% CI: 0.333–0.571; P < 0.001). The prognostic utility of MGMT status varies significantly by treatment type (P = 0.001): the HR for OS for MGMT silenced tumors is 0.190 (0.047–0.770), 0.403 (0.282–0.576), 0.743 (0.579–0.954), and 1.070 (0.722–1.585) for studies using surgery plus the addition of either: chemotherapy (CT), chemoradiotherapy (CRT), radiotherapy (RT), and nothing (surgery alone), respectively. Epigenetic silencing of MGMT is associated with markedly improved survival in patients with HGG who receive adjuvant therapy. MGMT silencing serves as a predictive marker, with the largest benefit seen in patients receiving CT as a component of adjuvant treatment, an intermediate benefit in patients receiving adjuvant RT, and no evidence to support benefit in those receiving surgery alone.     

Minimal Residual Disease and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BackgroundPatients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who achieve undetectable minimal residual disease (U-MRD) (ie, < 10^-4 detectable leukemic cells in peripheral blood or bone marrow) have better outcomes than those with detectable MRD. To assess the magnitude of improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in patients who achieved U-MRD after upfront chemotherapy (CT) or chemo-immunotherapy (CIT), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.Materials and MethodsThe screening process adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guidelines. The search strategy yielded 365 records, including 22 articles assessed for eligibility.ResultsEleven studies comprising 2457 patients with CLL treated in upfront with CT or CIT were considered suitable for inclusion in the quantitative meta-analysis. Nine studies (n = 2088) provided data on the impact of MRD on PFS and 6 (n = 1234) on OS. MRD was the main endpoint in only 2 of these studies (n = 213). Tests of heterogeneity revealed significant differences among studies for PFS and OS, which highlights differences across studies. U-MRD status was associated with significantly better PFS overall (P < .001) and in patients who achieved conventional complete remission (P = .01). Regarding OS, U-MRD predicted longer OS globally (P < .001) but not in patients having achieved complete remission (P = .82).ConclusionsU-MRD status after treatment with CT or CIT in newly diagnosed CLL is associated with long-term survival. These findings provide quantitative evidence to support the integration of MRD assessment as an end point in clinical trials of CLL.     

Survival and prognostic factors in patients with pancreatic squamous cell carcinoma

ObjectivesSquamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of pancreas is rare entity with poorly defined prognostic factors and therapeutic outcomes. We sought to determine the overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors of patients with pancreatic SCC using National Cancer Database (NCDB) (2004–15).MethodsKaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to perform OS analysis. Propensity-matched analysis was used to compare the OS of pancreatic SCC and adenocarcinoma.ResultsOf the 515 cases included in our analysis, 46% were female. Approximately half of the cohort (48%) received chemotherapy or radiation therapy or both. Twenty six percent (33/125) of stage I and II disease (localized disease), 11% (8/72) of stage III, and 2% (6/318) of stage IV disease underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor. Median OS for the entire cohort was 4 months and was significantly higher in patients who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor (17 vs 4 months, p < 0.001). In localized disease, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved OS in early stage disease (20 vs 24 months, p = 0.60). Stage IV patients treated with chemotherapy had a better OS than those without (5 vs 2 months, p < 0.0001). Propensity matched analysis demonstrated no significant differences in median OS between pancreatic adenocarcinoma (4.8 months) and SCC (4 months, p = 0.09).ConclusionsPancreatic SCC had a diverse OS that varied significantly according to increasing age (>70 years) and stage of the disease at presentation (p < 0.01). Surgical resection of primary tumor was associated with longer OS in stages I-II, whereas chemotherapy was associated with longer OS in stage IV disease.     

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: Evaluation of systemic chemotherapy with comprehensive treatment through the RENAPE Database: Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study

PurposeDiffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a severe disease with mainly locoregional evolution. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is the reported treatment with the longest survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of perioperative systemic chemotherapy strategies on survival and postoperative outcomes in patients with DMPM treated with curative intent with CRS-HIPEC, using a multi-institutional database: the French RENAPE network.Patients and methodsFrom 1991 to 2014, 126 DMPM patients underwent CRS-HIPEC at 20 tertiary centres. The population was divided into four groups according to perioperative treatment: only neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA), only adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ), perioperative chemotherapy (PO) and no chemotherapy before or after CRS-HIPEC (NoC).ResultsAll groups (NA: n = 42; ADJ: n = 16; PO: n = 16; NoC: n = 48) were comparable regarding clinicopathological data and main DMPM prognostic factors. After a median follow-up of 61 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 40%, 67%, 62% and 56% in NA, ADJ, PO and NoC groups, respectively (P = 0.049). Major complications occurred for 41%, 45%, 35% and 41% of patients from NA, ADJ, PO and NoC groups, respectively (P = 0.299). In multivariate analysis, NA was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.07–4.94; P = 0.033).ConclusionThis retrospective study suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy may delay recurrence and improve survival and that NA may impact negatively the survival for patients with DMPM who underwent CRS-HIPEC with curative intent. Upfront CRS and HIPEC should be considered when achievable, waiting for stronger level of scientific evidence.     

Comparative Effectiveness of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

IntroductionThe use of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer has been increasing in recent years, but the long-term overall survival characteristics of this approach is currently unknown.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer within the National Cancer Database. Patients who received TNT (defined as chemotherapy, followed by CRT, followed by surgery) were propensity score matched to patients who received adjuvant therapy (defined as CRT, followed by surgery, followed by chemotherapy). We compared overall survival (OS) and rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) between the 2 arms.ResultsOf the 4300 patients in our cohort, 3502 (81%) received adjuvant therapy and 798 (19%) received TNT. At baseline, patients who received TNT were more likely to have higher clinical T and N stages (P< .001). The 5-year OS was 77% for both TNT and adjuvant therapy patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.28, P = .57). After propensity score matching and adjusting for potential confounders, there were no significant differences in OS (HR_adj 1.00, 95% CI, 0.71-1.40, P = .99). After propensity score matching, there were higher pCR rates among TNT patients (16.1%) compared to adjuvant therapy patients (12.0%) (P = .037).ConclusionIn this observational study, we found TNT was not associated with a lower OS compared to standard adjuvant chemotherapy. This finding potentially reassures clinicians choosing TNT as an alternative to adjuvant chemotherapy. However, future prospective data are needed to confirm these findings.