Stress hyperglycemia may not be harmful in critically ill patients with sepsis

Background

Stress hyperglycemia (SH) is commonly seen in critically ill patients. It has been shown to be associated with adverse outcomes in some groups of patients. The effects of SH on critically ill patients with sepsis have not been well studied. We aimed to evaluate the effects of SH in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients with sepsis admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) over a 5-year period were included.

Results

Of 297 patients, 204 (68.7%) had SH during the study period. The mean blood glucose level in patients with SH was 8.7 mmol/L compared with 5.9 mmol/L in those without SH (P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences in age; sex; sepsis severity; cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal comorbidities; requirement of mechanical ventilation; inotropes; and Acute Physiology, Age, and Chronic Health Evaluation III and Simplified Acute Physiology 2 scores on ICU admission. Intensive care unit mortality was significantly lower in patients who had SH. The median duration of ICU and hospital length of stay was longer in patients with SH. On logistic regression analysis, the presence of SH was associated with reduced ICU mortality. Subgroup analysis revealed SH to be protective in patients with septic shock.

Conclusion

Stress hyperglycemia may not be harmful in critically ill patients with sepsis. Patients with SH had lower ICU mortality.     

Volume of fluids administered during resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock and the development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between the volume of intravenous (IV) fluids administered in the resuscitative phase of severe sepsis and septic shock and the development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock at a large academic public hospital. The relationship between the volume of IV fluids administered and the development of ARDS was examined using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

Among 296 patients hospitalized for severe sepsis and septic shock, 75 (25.3%) developed ARDS. After controlling for confounding variables, there was no significant association between the volume of IV fluids administered in the first 24 hours of hospitalization and the development of ARDS (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.18). Serum albumin (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.87) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.13) on admission were the most informative covariates for the development of ARDS in the regression model.

Conclusions

For patients hospitalized for severe sepsis and septic shock, fluid administration to improve end-organ perfusion should remain the top priority in early resuscitation despite the potential risk of inducing ARDS.     

Initial fractal exponent of heart rate variability is associated with success of early resuscitation in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: a prospective cohort study

Introduction

Heart rate variability (HRV) reflects autonomic nervous system tone as well as the overall health of the baroreflex system. We hypothesized that loss of complexity in HRV upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission would be associated with unsuccessful early resuscitation of sepsis.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled patients admitted to ICUs with severe sepsis or septic shock from 2009 to 2011. We studied 30 minutes of electrocardiogram, sampled at 500 Hz, at ICU admission and calculated heart rate complexity via detrended fluctuation analysis. Primary outcome was vasopressor independence at 24 hours after ICU admission. Secondary outcome was 28-day mortality.

Results

We studied 48 patients, of whom 60% were vasopressor independent at 24 hours. Five (10%) died within 28 days. The ratio of fractal alpha parameters was associated with both vasopressor independence and 28-day mortality (P = .04) after controlling for mean heart rate. In the optimal model, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and the long-term fractal α parameter were associated with vasopressor independence.

Conclusions

Loss of complexity in HRV is associated with worse outcome early in severe sepsis and septic shock. Further work should evaluate whether complexity of HRV could guide treatment in sepsis.     

Prognosis and 1-year mortality of intensive care unit patients with severe hepatic encephalopathy

Purpose

Data regarding outcome of patients with chronic liver disease with severe hepatic encephalopathy in intensive care unit are currently scarce.

Methods

This study is a retrospective observational case series in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) in a university hospital from 1995 to 2005. Patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) (admitted with or developing) were identified. Clinical and laboratory parameters were analyzed to determinate predictors of ICU and 1-year mortality.

Results

Seventy-one patients were included (53 male). Median Simplified Acute Physiology Score was 56 with Child-Pugh score 11 ± 2. Seventy-six percent of patients were admitted with coma (Glasgow Coma Scale, 7.7 ± 4). Eighty-two percent of patients required intubation, and 28% vasopressors. Thirty-five percent died during ICU stay. At 1 year, mortality was 54%. Univariate analysis identified arterial hypotension, mechanical ventilation, vasopressors at any time, acute renal failure, Simplified Acute Physiology Score, and sepsis associated with ICU mortality. In multivariate analysis, vasopressor use or acute renal failure was the main independent predictor of ICU death and 1-year mortality. Patients free of these risk factors, even requiring intubation, were identified as isolated HE, with lower mortality rates.

Conclusion

Predictors of outcome were similar to other groups of patients with liver disease admitted for other reasons. Intensive care unit mortality was lower than reported for other groups of patients with similar illness. Patients with severe HE admitted to ICU with no organ dysfunction other than mechanical ventilation had a better outcome and may require ICU admission.     

Dopamine therapy in septic shock: Detrimental effect on survival?

Objective

The aim of this study is to examine the potential impact of dopamine therapy on 28-day mortality in adult septic shock.

Methods

For 66 months, clinical data, medications taken before admission, doses of catecholamines used, and biological parameters were recorded prospectively in all patients admitted for septic shock. This observational study was followed by (1) post hoc multivariate analyses and (2) risk-adjusted matched cohort study.

Measurements and main results

In 277 patients (65 ± 14 years; Simplified Acute Physiology Score II = 54 ± 19, 28-day mortality = 45%; hospital mortality = 53%), 6 factors were linked to 28-day mortality, including Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (P < .0001) and the use of dopamine (P = .043). In a pair-matched cohort of 132 patients, we observed a higher mortality with dopamine (28-day mortality of 62% vs 41%, respectively; P = .006). Dopamine remained linked to day 28 mortality by conditional logistic analysis (odds ratio = 6.2 [1.5-25]). A strong interaction between essential hypertension and dopamine was found, associated to 81% 28-day mortality in patients having both conditions.

Conclusions

In our cohort study, dopamine use was linked to mortality as compared to other vasopressor therapies, particularly in patients with essential hypertension. Future randomized studies attempting to compare dopamine with other therapies in septic shock should pay attention to patients with essential hypertension.     

Prognostic factors of mortality in patients with community-acquired bloodstream infection with severe sepsis and septic shock

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to determine the independent risk factors on mortality in patients with community-acquired severe sepsis and septic shock.

Methods

A single-site prospective cohort study was carried out in a medical-surgical intensive care unit in an academic tertiary care center. One hundred twelve patients with community-acquired bloodstream infection with severe sepsis and septic shock were identified. Clinical, microbiologic, and laboratory parameters were compared between hospital survivors and hospital deaths.

Results

One-hundred twelve patients were included. The global mortality rate was 41.9%, 44.5% in septic shock and 34.4% in severe sepsis. One or more comorbidities were present in 66% of patients. The most commonly identified bloodstream pathogens were Escherichia coli (25%) and Staphylococcus aureus (21.4%). The proportion of patients receiving inadequate antimicrobial treatment was 8.9%. By univariate analysis, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, at least 3 organ dysfunctions, and albumin, but neither microbiologic characteristics nor site of infection, differed significantly between survivors and nonsurvivors. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.21) and albumin (odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.76) were independent risk factors associated with global mortality in logistic regression analysis.

Conclusion

In addition to the severity of illness, hypoalbuminemia was identified as the most important prognostic factor in community-acquired bloodstream infection with severe sepsis and septic shock.     

Procollagen type III aminoterminal propeptide as biomarker of host response in severe sepsis

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that procollagen type III aminoterminal propeptide (PIIINP) is early elevated in septic episodes and can indicate the acute organ dysfunction/failure characterizing severe sepsis.

Materials and Methods

This prospective study included 107 consecutive septic patients (44 with sepsis, 13 with severe sepsis, and 50 with septic shock) and 45 controls. After blood sampling (within 48 hours after onset of septic episodes), serum was assayed. Patients were followed up, and their disease severity was daily evaluated.

Results

Procollagen type III aminoterminal propeptide (median [range]) increased in patients with sepsis (9.4 [2.2-42.4] ng/mL) compared with controls (3.6 [1.9-4.9] ng/mL; P < .001), exhibiting further significant increase in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock (19.5 [6.0-52.4] and 20.2 [1.8-89.2] ng/mL, respectively; P < .01-.001 vs sepsis). Among biomarkers of host response severity, PIIINP was the sole that was independently associated with severe sepsis/septic shock (P = .01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for PIIINP to predict which patients with sepsis would eventually develop severe sepsis/septic shock was 0.87; the cutoff of 12 ng/mL had sensitivity 82% and specificity 89%.

Conclusions

Increased serum PIIINP can signify severe sepsis/septic shock and predict which patients with sepsis will eventually develop severe sepsis/septic shock, thus representing a biomarker of risk stratification of patients with sepsis.     

Effect of corticosteroids on arginine vasopressin–containing vasopressor therapy for septic shock: a case control study

Purpose

Studies showing corticosteroids decrease time to shock reversal in septic shock did not include arginine vasopressin, which also may reduce the duration of catecholamine therapy. Thus, the effect of corticosteroids on vasopressin-containing vasopressor regimens is unknown. We designed this study to evaluate the effect of corticosteroids on time to vasopressin-containing vasopressor withdrawal and the proportion of patients alive without vasopressors at day 7.

Methods

This retrospective, case-control study included patients admitted to the intensive care units of an academic medical center who received vasopressin-containing vasopressor regimens for septic shock with or without concomitant corticosteroids. Twenty-one corticosteroid-treated patients were matched to those without corticosteroids.

Results

Both groups had similar Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. There was no significant difference in median time to vasopressor withdrawal (65 hours vs 20 hours, P = .09) whether corticosteroids were given or withheld. Patients who received corticosteroids, however, were significantly more likely alive without vasopressors at day 7 than patients who received a vasopressin-containing vasopressor regimen alone (80.9% vs 47.6%, P = .02).

Conclusions

Although corticosteroids did not improve the time to withdrawal of vasopressin-containing vasopressor therapy they significantly increased the proportion of patients alive without vasopressors at day 7.     

The usefulness of the semiquantitative procalcitonin test kit as a guideline for starting antibiotic administration

Objectives

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign has recommended that antibiotic therapy should be started within the first hour of recognizing severe sepsis. Procalcitonin has recently been proposed as a biomarker of bacterial infection, although the quantitative procalcitonin assay is often time consuming, and it is not always available in many emergency departments (EDs). Our aim is to evaluate usefulness of the semiquantitative procalcitonin fast kit as a guideline for starting antibiotic administration for patients with severe sepsis or septic shock that requires prompt antibiotic therapy in the ED.

Methods

We include those patients who were admitted to the ED and who were suspected of having infection. The procalcitonin concentration was determined by semiquantitative PCT-Q strips, and the points of the severity scoring system were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the diagnostic value of the PCT-Q strips to predict severe sepsis or septic shock.

Results

Of the 80 recruited patients, 33 patients were categorized as having severe sepsis or septic shock according to the definition. At a procalcitonin cutoff level of 2 ng/mL or greater, the sensitivity of the PCT-Q for detecting severe sepsis or septic shock was 93.94% and the specificity was 87.23. The receiver operating characteristic curve for PCT-Q to predict severe sepsis or septic shock had an area under the curve of 0.916.

Conclusion

PCT-Q is probably a fast, useful method for detecting severe sepsis in the ED, and it can be used as a guideline for antibiotic treatment.     

Outcome of patients with injection drug use–associated endocarditis admitted to an intensive care unit

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to study the outcome of patients with injection drug use–associated infective endocarditis (IDU-IE) admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU).

Material and Methods

A retrospective review of medical records of 33 consecutive patients with IDU-IE admitted to ICU was conducted.

Results

Main indications for admission to ICU were as follows: severe sepsis or septic shock (36%), respiratory failure (33%), and neurologic deterioration (18%). Staphylococcus aureus was found in 94% of patients, and 15% had polymicrobial infection. Fifteen (45%) patients had septic emboli to 1 or more organs, including 12 (36%) to lungs and 7 (21%) to central nervous system. In-hospital mortality was 27%, and in univariate analysis, previous history of endocarditis (odds ratio [OR], 11.2; P = .03), respiratory failure (OR, 7; P = .03), neurologic failure (OR, 6.25; P = .03), and high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (OR, 1.21; P = .016) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores (OR, 1.25; P = .01) increased risk of death. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, previous history of endocarditis and high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score were independently associated with poor survival.

Conclusions

Complicated IDU-IE necessitating admission to ICU is associated with high mortality. In addition to consequences of sepsis, septic embolization to central nervous system and lungs contributes to development of organ failure. Increased severity of illness and prior history of endocarditis are associated with poor outcome.     

Potential effect of physiotherapeutic treatment on mortality rate in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: A retrospective cohort analysis

Purpose

The aim of the study was to examine the onset and frequency of physiotherapeutic interventions (PTI) and their potential effects on the intensive care unit (ICU) mortality rate in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Material and Methods

Retrospective data analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were performed.

Results

About 6.2% of all patients (n = 999, length of ICU stay 12 days, averaged SOFA score 14) developed sepsis within three years. Of these, 77% received at least once PTI. The relative number of PTI (RNPTI index, individually calculated by the number of PTI/length of stay) in patients with sepsis was 42%. The first physiotherapeutic treatment was five days after ICU admission. Cox regression multivariate analysis adjusted by disease severity scores, sedation state and other clinical variables found RNPTI index as significant risk factor for the ICU mortality rate (hazard ratio, 0.982; 95% confidence interval, 0.974-0.990; P < .001).

Conclusions

Physiotherapists routinely assess and treat patients with sepsis. The frequency of PTI was associated with an improved outcome. Prospective studies are necessary to confirm the potential favorable impact.     

Soluble urokinase–type plasminogen activator receptor as a prognostic biomarker in critically ill patients

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the role of blood soluble urokinase–type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) levels in the diagnosis and prognostication of sepsis in critically ill patients.

Methods

Serum suPAR levels were measured prospectively in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients on admission and then daily until ICU discharge (maximum of 14 days) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Normal levels were established in 31 healthy controls.

Results

We included 258 patients (161 men); median admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were 17 (9-23) and 6 (3-9), respectively. The mortality rate was 13.6%. Sepsis was diagnosed on admission in 94 patients (36%), of whom 23 had severe sepsis and 49 had septic shock. On admission, septic patients had higher suPAR levels than did nonseptic patients (8.9 [5.9-12.7] vs 3.7 [2.7-5.4] ng/mL), but the predictive value of suPAR for diagnosing sepsis was weaker than that of C-reactive protein. During the week after ICU admission, serum suPAR concentrations correlated with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores over time. High suPAR levels on admission were a strong independent predictor for ICU and 28-day mortality. In the global population, a suPAR level higher than 6.15 ng/mL had 66% sensitivity and 64% specificity for prediction of ICU mortality, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.726 (95% confidence interval, 0.645-0.808).

Conclusions

In ICU patients, serum suPAR concentrations have limited use for identifying sepsis, but their time course correlated with the degree of organ dysfunction, and they have prognostic value in septic and nonseptic populations.     

Impact of serial measurements of lysophosphatidylcholine on 28-day mortality prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe sepsis or septic shock

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of serial lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) measurement on 28-day mortality prediction in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

This is a prospective observational study of 74 ICU patients in a tertiary hospital. Serum LPC, white blood cell, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin (PCT) levels were measured at baseline (day 1 of enrollment) and day 7. The LPC concentrations were compared with inflammatory markers using their absolute levels and relative changes.

Results

The LPC concentration on day 7 was significantly lower in nonsurvivors than in survivors (68.45 ± 42.36 μmol/L and 99.76 ± 73.65 μmol/L; P = .04). A decreased LPC concentration on day 7 to its baseline as well as a sustained high concentration of PCT on day 7 at more than 50% of its baseline value was useful for predicting the 28-day mortality. Prognostic utility was substantially improved when combined LPC and PCT criteria were applied to 28-day mortality outcome predictions. Furthermore, LPC concentrations increased over time in patients with appropriate antibiotics but not in those with inappropriate antibiotics.

Conclusions

Serial measurements of LPC help in the prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.     

Sagittal abdominal diameter may effectively predict future complications and increased mortality in intensive care unit patients with severe sepsis

Purpose

To investigate whether increased visceral adipose tissue is a risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality in intensive care patients with severe sepsis.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective cohort study, body mass index (BMI) and sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) were measured in all patients with severe sepsis immediately after admission in the intensive care unit (ICU). The patients were followed up until death or discharge from ICU. The study’s primary outcome measure was mortality until day 60 after admission, while secondary outcomes were morbidity, length of stay, and length of ventilation in ICU.

Results

Of the 30 patients, 24 (80%) developed septic shock, 6 (20%) multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, 13 (43.3%) necessitated continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration, while 6 (20%) of them died. BMI and SAD had a statistically significant positive linear correlation with ICU length of stay (P < .001) and length of ventilation (P ≤ .001). However, only SAD was significantly correlated with the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (P = .033), the need for continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (P = .004), and death (P = .033).

Conclusion

An increased SAD may effectively predict future complications and increased mortality in intensive care unit patients with severe sepsis.     

Epidemiologic features,risk factors,and outcome of sepsis in stroke patients treated on a neurologic intensive care unit

Purpose

Because of the immune-suppressive effect of cerebral damage, stroke patients are at high risk for infections. These might result in sepsis, which is the major contributor to intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Although there are numerous studies on infections in stroke patients, the role of sepsis as a poststroke complication is unknown.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed incidence of and risk factors for sepsis acquisition as well as outcome parameters of 238 patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes consecutively admitted to the neurologic ICU in a tertiary university hospital between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010. Basic demographic and clinical data including microbiological parameters as well as factors describing stroke severity (eg, lesion volume and National Institute of Health stroke scale score) were recorded and included into the analysis. The diagnosis of sepsis was based on the criteria of the German Sepsis Society.

Results

We identified 30 patients (12.6%) with sepsis within the first 7 days from stroke onset. The lungs were the most frequent source of infection (93.3%), and gram-positive organisms were dominating the microbiologic spectrum (52.4%). Comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and immunosuppressive disorders) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II but none of the factors describing stroke severity were independent predictors of sepsis acquisition. Sepsis was associated with a significantly worse prognosis, leading to a 2-fold increased mortality rate during in-hospital care (36.7% vs 18.8%) and after 3 months (56.5% vs 28.5%), but only in the subgroup of supratentorial hemorrhages, it was an independent predictor of in-hospital and 3-month mortality. Other factors significantly associated with death in a multivariate analysis were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignancies (in-hospital mortality only), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (3-month mortality only) for ischemia and heart failure (in-hospital mortality only), National Institute of Health stroke scale score (in-hospital mortality only), and stroke volume for hemorrhages, respectively.

Conclusions

Sepsis seems to be a frequent complication of stroke patients requiring neurologic ICU treatment. Predictors of sepsis acquisition in our study were comorbidities and severity of deterioration of physiological status, but not stroke severity. A better understanding of risk factors is important for prevention and early recognition, whereas knowledge of outcome may help in prognosis prediction. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal preventive treatment for these patients.     

Prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit

Objective

The objective of this study is to identify factors predicting intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in cancer patients admitted to a medical ICU.

Patients and methods

We conducted a retrospective study in 162 consecutive cancer patients admitted to the medical ICU of a 1000-bed university hospital between January 2009 and June 2012. Medical history, physical and laboratory findings on admission, and therapeutic interventions during ICU stay were recorded. The study end point was ICU mortality. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for ICU mortality.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 104 (64.2%) patients with solid tumors and 58 patients (35.8%) with hematological malignancies. The major causes of ICU admission were sepsis/septic shock (66.7%) and respiratory failure (63.6%), respectively. Overall ICU mortality rate was 55 % (n = 89). The ICU mortality rates were similar in patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors (57% vs 53.8%; P = .744). Four variables were independent predictors for ICU mortality in cancer patients: the remission status of the underlying cancer on ICU admission (odds ratio [OR], 0.113; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.027-0.48; P = .003), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.032-1.215; P = .007), sepsis/septic shock during ICU stay (OR, 8.94; 95% CI, 2.28-35; P = .002), and vasopressor requirement (OR 16.84; 95% CI, 3.98-71.24; P = .0001). Although Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.054-1.61; P = .014), admission through emergency service (OR, 0.005; 95% CI, 0.00-0.69; P = .035), and vasopressor requirement during ICU stay (OR, 140.64; 95% CI, 3.59-5505.5; P = .008) were independent predictors for ICU mortality in patients with hematological malignancies, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.29-2.6; P = .001), lactate dehydrogenase level on admission (OR, 1.002; 95% CI, 1-1.005; P = .028), sepsis/septic shock during ICU stay (OR, 138.4; 95% CI, 12.54-1528.4; P = .0001), and complete or partial remission of the underlying cancer (OR, 0.026; 95% CI, 0.002-0.3; P = .004) were the independent risk factors in patients with solid tumors.

Conclusion

Intensive care unit mortality rate was 55% in our cancer patients, which suggests that patients with cancer can benefit from ICU admission. We also found that ICU mortality rates of patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors were similar.     

Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock: We could go faster

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of applying sepsis bundles in the intensive care unit (ICU) and their effect on outcomes.

Methods

In this prospective, observational study in a 31-bed capacity department of intensive care, we measured the time taken to perform sepsis bundle interventions in 69 consecutive patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Results

Compliance with the 6-hour bundle was obtained in 44 (72%) of 61 patients; these patients had a lower mortality rate (16% vs 41%, P = .04) and shorter ICU stay (median [range], 5 [3-10] vs 9 [6-19] days, P = .01) than other patients. Compliance with the 24-hour bundle was obtained in 30 (67%) of 44 eligible patients. The mortality rate and duration of ICU stay were not significantly lower in the 24-hour compliant as compared with the noncompliant group (23% vs 33% and 6 [4-11] vs 9 [6-25] days, respectively; P value is not significant). Patients who complied with the 24-hour sepsis bundle after only 12 hours had a lower mortality rate (10% vs 39%, P = .036) and shorter stay (6 [4-10] vs 9 [6-25] days, P = .055) than those who were compliant after 24 hours.

Conclusions

Correct application of the sepsis bundles was associated with reduced mortality and length of ICU stay. Earlier implementation of the 24-hour management bundle could result in better outcomes.     

Comparison of Predisposition, Insult/Infection, Response, and Organ dysfunction, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II, and Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis in patients meeting criteria for early goal-directed therapy and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle

Purpose

The aim of the study was to examine the performance of the Predisposition, Insult/Infection, Response, and Organ dysfunction (PIRO) model compared with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) scoring systems in predicting in-hospital mortality for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Materials and Methods

This study was an analysis of a prospectively maintained registry including adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock meeting criteria for early goal-directed therapy and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle over a 6-year period. The registry contains data on patient demographics, sepsis category, vital signs, laboratory values, ED length of stay, hospital length of stay, physiologic scores, and outcome status. The discrimination and calibration characteristics of PIRO, APACHE II, and MEDS were analyzed.

Results

Five-hundred forty-one patients with age 63.5 ± 18.5 years were enrolled, 61.9% in septic shock, 46.9% blood-culture positive, and 31.8% in-hospital mortality. Median (25th and 75th percentile) PIRO, APACHE II, and MEDS scores were 6 (5 and 8), 28 (22 and 34), and 12 (9 and 15), with predicted mortalities of 48.5% (40.1 and 63.9), 66.0% (42.0 and 83.0), and 16.0% (9.0 and 39.0), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for PIRO was 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.75); APACHE II, 0.71 (0.66-0.76); and MEDS, 0.63 (0.60-0.70). The standardized mortality ratio was 0.70 (0.08-1.41), 0.70 (−0.46 to 1.80), and 4.00 (−8.53 to 16.62), respectively. Actual mortality significantly increased with increasing PIRO score in patients with APACHE II 25 or more (P < .01).

Conclusions

The PIRO, APACHE II, and MEDS have variable abilities to early discriminate and estimate in-hospital mortality of patients presenting to the ED meeting criteria for early goal-directed therapy and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle. The PIRO may provide additional risk stratification in patients with APACHE II 25 or more. More studies are required to evaluate the clinical applicability of PIRO in high-risk patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.     

Absolute eosinophils count as a marker of mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in an intensive care unit

Introduction

Eosinophils in the circulating blood undergo apoptosis during sepsis syndromes induced by the action of certain cytokines.

Objective

The aim of the study was to evaluate the absolute eosinophils count (EC) as a marker of mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock.

Patients and Method

A prospective cohort study of patients with a diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Dr Gustavo Fricke Hospital between January 2008 and December 2009 was conducted. Daily EC in all patients was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the performance of the diagnostic test.

Results

We studied a total of 240 patients. The median age was 62 years (interquartile range [IQR], 48-72 years), and 67 (27.9%) died. The median EC in patients who died was 43 (IQR, 14-121), whereas in surviving patients, it was 168 (IQR, 98-292) (P < .001). When the EC on the fifth day of hospital stay was assessed, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.73) was observed. Eosinophils count at intensive care unit discharge showed an area under the curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.87).

Discussion

Eosinophils counts were lower in patients who died of sepsis than in those who survived, but its clinical usefulness seems limited. Their role as an indicator of clinical stability seems to be important.     

Incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock in German intensive care units: the prospective,multicentre INSEP study

Purpose

To estimate the incidence density, point prevalence and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in German intensive care units (ICUs).

Methods

In a prospective, multicentre, longitudinal observational study, all patients already on the ICU at 0:00 on 4 November 2013 and all patients admitted to a participating ICU between 0:00 on 4 November 2013 and 2359 hours on 1 December 2013 were included. The patients were followed up for the occurrence of severe sepsis or septic shock (SEPSIS-1 definitions) during their ICU stay.

Results

A total of 11,883 patients from 133 ICUs at 95 German hospitals were included in the study, of whom 1503 (12.6 %) were diagnosed with severe sepsis or septic shock. In 860 cases (57.2 %) the infections were of nosocomial origin. The point prevalence was 17.9 % (95 % CI 16.3–19.7).The calculated incidence rate of severe sepsis or septic shock was 11.64 (95 % CI 10.51–12.86) per 1000 ICU days. ICU mortality in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock was 34.3 %, compared with 6 % in those without sepsis. Total hospital mortality of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock was 40.4 %. Classification of the septic shock patients using the new SEPSIS-3 definitions showed higher ICU and hospital mortality (44.3 and 50.9 %).

Conclusions

Severe sepsis and septic shock continue to be a frequent syndrome associated with high hospital mortality. Nosocomial infections play a major role in the development of sepsis. This study presents a pragmatic, affordable and feasible method for the surveillance of sepsis epidemiology. Implementation of the new SEPSIS-3 definitions may have a major effect on future epidemiological data.