Bortezomib for Acute Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in Liver Transplantation

Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) is an uncommon, but challenging type of rejection after solid organ transplantation. We review three cases of AMR in ABO‐compatible liver transplant recipients. These cases were characterized by severe acute rejection resistant to steroids and antithymocyte globulin, histologic evidence of plasma cell infiltrates, C4d positivity and high serum anti‐HLA donor‐specific antibodies. All three patients were treated with bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor effective in depleting plasma cells. After treatment, all patients had improved or normal liver function tests, resolution of C4d deposition and significant decline in their HLA donor‐specific antibodies.     

The Significance of Donor‐Specific HLA Antibodies in Rejection and Ductopenia Development in ABO Compatible Liver Transplantation

The role of humoral alloreactivity in ABO‐compatible liver transplantation remains unclear. To understand the significance of donor‐specific HLA alloantibodies (DSA) in liver rejection, we applied the currently used strategy for detection of antibody‐mediated rejection of other solid allografts. For this purpose we reviewed the data on 43 recipients of ABO identical/compatible donor livers who had indication liver biopsy stained for complement element C4d and contemporaneous circulating DSA determination. Seventeen (40%) patients had significant circulating DSA in association with diffuse portal C4d deposition (DSA+/diffuse C4d+). These DSA+/diffuse C4d+ subjects had higher frequency of acute cellular rejection (ACR) 15/17 versus 13/26 (88% vs. 50%), p = 0.02, and steroid resistant rejection 7/17 versus 5/26 (41% vs. 19%), p = 0.03. Based on detection of the combination DSA+/diffuse C4d+, 53.6% of cases of ACR had evidence of concurrent humoral alloreactivity. Six of the 10 patients with ductopenic rejection had circulating DSA and diffuse portal C4d, three of whom (2 early and 1 late posttransplantation) developed unrelenting cholestasis, necessitating specific antibody‐depleting therapy to salvage the allografts. Thus, in ABO‐compatible liver transplantation humoral alloreactivity mediated by antibodies against donor HLA molecules appears to be frequently intertwined with cellular mechanisms of rejection, and to play a role in ductopenia development.     

Significance of complement split product C4d in ABO-compatible liver allograft: diagnosing utility in acute antibody mediated rejection

Diagnosis of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is difficult and requires a constellation of clinical, laboratory and histologic features that support the disease and exclude other causes. Histologic features of AMR may intermix with those of biliary obstruction, preservation/reperfusion injury, and graft ischemia. Tissue examination for complement degradation product 4d (C4d) has been proved to support this diagnosis in other allografts. For this reason, we conducted a retrospective review of all ABO compatible/identical re-transplanted liver patients with primary focus on identifying AMR as a possible cause of graft failure and to investigate the utility of C4d in liver allograft specimens. We reviewed 193 liver samples obtained from 53 consecutive ABO-compatible re-transplant patients. 142 specimens were stained with C4d. Anti-donor antibody screening and identification was determined by Luminex100 flow cytometry. For the study analysis, patients were stratified into 3 groups according to time to graft failure: group A, patients with graft failure within 0-7 days (n = 7), group B within 8-90 days (n = 13) and C > 90 days (n = 33). Two patients (3.7%) met the diagnostic criteria of acute AMR. Both patients experienced rapid decline of graft function with presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA), morphologic evidence of humoral rejection and C4d deposition in liver specimens. C4d-positive staining was identified in different medical liver conditions i.e., acute cellular rejection (52%), chronic ductopenic rejection (50%), recurrent liver disease (48%), preservation injury (18%), and hepatic necrosis (54%). Univariate analysis showed no significant difference of C4d-positive staining among the 3 patients groups, or patients with DSA (P > .05). In conclusion, AMR after ABO-compatible liver transplantation is an uncommon cause of graft failure. Unlike other solid organ allografts, C4d-positive staining is not a rugged indicator of humoral rejection, thus, interpretation should be done with caution to avoid diagnostic dilemmas.     

C4d in Acute Rejection After Liver Transplantation—A Valuable Tool in Differential Diagnosis to Hepatitis C Recurrence

Hepatitis C is the most common indication for liver transplantation. Recurrence of HCV is universal leading to graft failure in up to 40% of all patients. The differentiation between acute rejection and recurrent hepatitis C is crucial as rejection treatments are likely to aggravate HCV recurrence. Histological examination of liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of acute rejection but has failed in the past to distinguish between acute rejection and recurrent hepatitis C. We have recently reported that C4d as a marker of the activated complement cascade is detectable in hepatic specimen in acute rejection after liver transplantation. In this study, we investigate whether C4d may serve as a specific marker for differential diagnosis in hepatitis C reinfection cases. Immunohistochemical analysis of 97 patients was performed. A total of 67.7% of patients with acute cellular rejection displayed C4d-positive staining in liver biopsy whereas 11.8% of patients with hepatitis C reinfection tested positive for C4d. In the control group, 6.9% showed C4d positivity. For the first time we were able to clearly demonstrate that humoral components, represented by C4d deposition, play a role in acute cellular rejection after LTX. Consequently C4d may be helpful to distinguish between acute rejection and reinfection after LTX for HCV.     

ABO血型不合肝移植研究新进展

复习国外文章关于ABO血型不相同的肝脏移植在A2型供肝使用，移植肝出现受体类型的ABO组织血型抗原，C4d作用和临床治疗上的新进展。A2型供肝能较安全的用于血型不合肝移植，毛细血管内表达r-ABOAg可能是移植物内皮损害和修复的表现，C4d阳性对血型不同肝移植治疗策略上是很好的参考物，但缺乏特异性，采用包括多联免疫抑制药和肝内灌注等综合治疗方法能有效预防排斥反应且能取得良好的预后。     

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome as a manifestation of acute antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after liver transplantation is uncommon but, when present, manifests as graft dysfunction. We report the case of a 54-year-old woman who developed portal hypertension with pleural effusion and ascites secondary to sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) due to acute AMR following an ABO-matched liver transplantation for autoimmune cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Initial immunosuppression comprised basiliximab, decreasing prednisone, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. After 1 month, she presented with the massive pleural effusion, slight ascites, and normal liver tests. After excluding common causes of pleural effusion, we performed a liver biopsy that showed atypical rejection with the involvement of large centrilobular veins partially occluded by marked endotheliitis and lax fibrosis suggestive of SOS. Direct immunofluorescence study of C4d showed diffuse endothelial sinusoidal staining, and de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies were detected in his blood. Thus, we diagnosed AMR focused on centrilobular veins and initiated treatment with defibrotide, steroid pulses, and diuretics. However, this was ineffective, and the pleural effusion only resolved when plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin were started. This case shows that AMR can cause SOS with portal hypertension and present with a pleural effusion, and as such, it should be suspected after excluding other more common causes of effusion.     

Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Human Cardiac Allografts: Evaluation of Immunoglobulins and Complement Activation Products C4d and C3d as Markers

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in human heart transplantation is an immunopathologic process in which injury to the graft is in part the result of activation of complement and it is poorly responsive to conventional therapy. We evaluated by immunofluorescence (IF), 665 consecutive endomyocardial biopsies from 165 patients for deposits of immunoglobulins and complement. Diffuse IF deposits in a linear capillary pattern greater than 2+ were considered significant. Clinical evidence of graft dysfunction was correlated with complement deposits. IF 2+ or higher was positive for IgG, 66%; IgM, 12%; IgA, 0.6%; C1q, 1.8%; C4d, 9% and C3d, 10%. In 3% of patients, concomitant C4d and C3d correlated with graft dysfunction or heart failure. In these 5 patients AMR occurred 56-163 months after transplantation, and they responded well to therapy for AMR but not to treatment with steroids. Systematic evaluation of endomyocardial biopsies is not improved by the use of antibodies for immunoglobulins or C1q. Concomitant use of C4d and C3d is very useful to diagnose AMR, when correlated with clinical parameters of graft function. AMR in heart transplant patients can occur many months or years after transplant.     

Humoral and cellular rejection after combined liver–kidney transplantation in low immunologic risk recipients

Combined liver–kidney transplantation is considered a low risk for immunologic complication. We report an unusual case of identical ABO liver–kidney recipient without preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies, transplanted across a T- and B-cell-negative cross-match and complicated by early acute humoral and cellular rejection, first in the liver then in the kidney. While analyzing the immunologic complications in our cohort of 12 low-risk combined liver–kidney recipients, only one recipient experienced a rejection episode without detection of anti-HLA antibody over time. Although humoral or cellular rejection is rare after combined kidney-liver transplantation, our data suggest that even in low-risk recipients, the liver does not always systematically protect the kidney from acute rejection. Indeed, the detection of C4d in the liver should be carefully followed after combined liver–kidney transplantation.     

Re‐examination of the Lymphocytotoxic Crossmatch in Liver Transplantation: Can C4d Stains Help in Monitoring?

C4d-assisted recognition of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPE) from donor-specific antibody-positive (DSA+) renal allograft recipients prompted study of DSA+ liver allograft recipients as measured by lymphocytotoxic crossmatch (XM) and/or Luminex. XM results did not influence patient or allograft survival, or cellular rejection rates, but XM+ recipients received significantly more prophylactic steroids. Endothelial C4d staining strongly correlates with XM+ (<3 weeks posttransplantation) and DSA+ status and cellular rejection, but not with worse Banff grading or treatment response. Diffuse C4d staining, XM+, DSA+ and ABO- incompatibility status, histopathology and clinical-serologic profile helped establish an isolated AMR diagnosis in 5 of 100 (5%) XM+ and one ABO-incompatible, recipients. C4d staining later after transplantation was associated with rejection and nonrejection-related causes of allograft dysfunction in DSA- and DSA+ recipients, some of whom had good outcomes without additional therapy. Liver allograft FFPE C4d staining: (a) can help classify liver allograft dysfunction; (b) substantiates antibody contribution to rejection; (c) probably represents nonalloantibody insults and/or complete absorption in DSA- recipients and (d) alone, is an imperfect AMR marker needing correlation with routine histopathology, clinical and serologic profiles. Further study in late biopsies and other tissue markers of liver AMR with simultaneous DSA measurements are needed.     

Characterization of rejection episodes in patients following positive crossmatch and ABO-incompatible live donor renal transplantation

For kidney transplant recipients with donor-specific antibody (DSA) to HLA- (+XM) or ABO-antigens (ABOI), there is a need to improve detection and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The methods included a retrospective review of consecutive patients that received plasmapheresis and immune globulin (PPIVIg) to abrogate +XM or ABOI. Twelve patients were transplanted after PPIVIg (+XM = 9, ABOI = 2, +XM/ABOI = 1). No hyperacute rejections occurred. Rejection occurred in seven patients [four AMR, three acute cellular rejection (ACR)]. In four +XM patients, DSA was detected during graft dysfunction despite lack of histologic and C4d features of AMR. In one patient, DSA preceded the histologic and immunofluorescent features of AMR. In another patient with borderline changes and DSA, graft function improved after PPIVIg, despite lack of histologic or immunofluorescent evidence of AMR. One patient with Banff IIA ACR and DSA treated with antithymocyte antibody but not PPIVIg had recurrent rejections and poor graft function. In +XM and ABOI recipients with graft dysfunction: (i) DSA may represent AMR in the absence of C4d or histologic features of AMR; (ii) DSA can precede C4d or light microscopic features of AMR; (iii) A poor outcome may result if DSA or continued allograft dysfunction is present and not treated despite a negative biopsy.     

Evaluation of C4d Deposition and Circulating Antibody in Small Bowel Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) consensus criteria are defined in kidney and heart transplantation by histological changes, circulating donor-specific antibody (DSA), and C4d deposition in affected tissue. AMR consensus criteria are not yet identified in small bowel transplantation (SBTx). We investigated those three criteria in 12 children undergoing SBTx, including one retransplantation and four combined liver-SBTx (SBTx), with a follow-up of 12 days to 2 years. All biopsies (91) were evaluated with a standardized grading scheme for acute rejection (AR), vascular lesions and C4d expression. Sera were obtained at day 0 and during the follow-up. C4d was expressed in 37% of biopsies with or without AR, but in 50% of biopsies with severe vascular lesions. In addition, vascular lesions were always associated with AR and a poor outcome. All children with AR (grade 2 or 3) observed before the third month died or lost the graft. DSA were never found in any studied sera. We found no evidence that C4d deposition was of any clinical relevance to the outcome of SBTx. However, the grading of vascular lesions may constitute a useful marker to identify AR that is potentially resistant to standard treatment, and for which an alternative therapy should be considered.     

Antibody-mediated rejection of the kidney after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

The prevalence, risk factors, and outcome of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of the kidney after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation are unknown. In 136 simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients who were followed for an average of 3.1 yr, 21 episodes of AMR of the kidney allograft were identified. Eight episodes occurred early (相似文献   

Strategic breakthrough in adult ABO‐incompatible living donor liver transplantation: preliminary results of consecutive seven cases

ABO‐incompatibility is a major obstacle to expanding exiguous donor pools in adult liver transplantation, especially in countries where grafts from deceased donors are uncommon. We present our preliminary results of ABO‐incompatible (ABO‐I) adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a new, simple protocol. Seven consecutive cases of ABO‐I LDLT were managed by the same protocol including pre‐operative administration of a single dose of rituximab (375 mg/m²) followed by three to five sessions of plasma exchange before LDLT without portal infusion therapy. The triple immunosuppression protocol consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids, with mycophenolate mofetil starting seven d before LDLT. Splenectomy was performed for all cases. All patients are alive (100% survival) with a mean follow‐up of 852 d (715–990 d). Neither antibody‐mediated nor hyperacute rejection were encountered. There was only one episode of mild acute cellular rejection, for which steroid augmentation was effective. The median preformed isoagglutinin antibody titer before plasma exchange was 256, while the median antibody titer immediately before LDLT was 16. In conclusion, adult ABO‐I LDLT results were excellent – comparable or even superior to those of ABO‐compatible LDLT. ABO‐I adult LDLT has now become a more applicable modality without the need for an appropriate donor.     

C4D deposition and positive posttransplant crossmatch are not necessarily markers of antibody-mediated rejection in renal allograft recipients

The aim of the study was to search for serologic, immunopathologic, and morphologic evidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) among patients with acute renal allograft dysfunction. The study included 19 patients with episodes of acute rejection (ARE) within the first year after transplantation. All patients had negative crossmatch tests before transplantation. Patients underwent biopsy for histologic and C4d examinations. All patients were monitored for donor-specific HLA alloantibodies during the first posttransplant year. Complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatches were performed with donor lymphocytes. In eight patients, the crossmatch test results changed to positive during ARE. In all biopsies except one with cortical infarction, we observed C4d staining (group 1). The biopsies of four patients showed histologic changes of AMR, and all of their grafts were lost. In one patient, cellular and vascular rejection (Banff II) were present; in two, Banff I; and in one, borderline lesions. These results were compared with 11 patients with ARE but negative posttransplant crossmatches and negative staining for C4d (group 2). The histologic findings in the biopsies of these patients were cellular interstitial and vascular rejection (Banff I and Banff II). With no features suggestive of AMR. During the first year after transplantation, the creatinine levels of group 1 patients, were significantly higher than group 2 patients. One-year graft survival was 50% in group 1 and 91% in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: C4d and a positive posttransplant crossmatch were not associated with histologic features of AMR in half of the ARE. Nevertheless, C4d deposition and positive posttransplant crossmatches correlated with allograft injury among renal transplant patients.     

Antibody-Mediated Rejection of a Pancreas Allograft

The role of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in pancreas transplantation is poorly understood. Here, we report on a patient who developed AMR of his pancreas allograft after receiving a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant. Pre-operative enhanced cytotoxicity and flow cytometry T-cell crossmatches were negative; B-cell crossmatches were not performed as per institutional protocol. The patient's post-operative course was significant for elevated serum amylase levels and development of hyperglycemia approximately 1 month after transplantation. A pancreatic biopsy at this time showed no cellular infiltrate but strong immunofluorescent staining for C4d in the interacinar capillaries. Analysis of the patient's serum identified donor-specific HLA-DR alloantibodies. He received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), rituximab and plasmapheresis, and his pancreatic function normalized. We conclude that clinically significant AMR can develop in a pancreas allograft and recommend that pancreatic biopsies be assessed for C4d deposition if the patient has risk factors for AMR and/or the pathologic evidence for cell-mediated rejection is underwhelming.     

Pathogenesis in ABO incompatible liver transplantation: a clinicohistological evaluation of four patients

Takeda K, Tanaka K, Morioka D, Kumamoto T, Endo I, Togo S, Shimada H. Pathogenesis in ABO incompatible liver transplantation: a clinicohistological evaluation of four patients.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 747–751. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: The aim of this study was to clarify the pathogenesis of antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) of ABO‐incompatible liver transplantation (ABO‐I‐LT). We investigated, within one month of surgery, the clinical courses of 10 patients who received ABO‐I‐LT. We encountered four cases of AMR, which were classified into two groups according to the stage of the AMR: early (within the first 14 postoperative days [PODs]) or late (after the 14th POD). There were three patients in the early stage, and one patient in the late stage. Three early‐stage AMR patients had both hyperbilirubinemia and thrombocytopenia within one month after LDLT, but the one late‐stage AMR patient had neither. On liver biopsy, hemorrhagic infiltration was seen more frequently in the early‐stage AMR patients than in the patient with late‐stage AMR. Plasma exchange combined with a large amount of gamma‐globulin bolus infusion therapy was effective in the three early‐stage patients, but the late‐stage AMR was controlled by antibiotic treatment. This study showed that the early‐stage AMR resulted from the antigen‐antibody reaction of ABO‐blood‐group antigens, while the late‐stage AMR may have been caused by an infection.     

Renal allograft biopsies in the era of C4d staining: the need for change in the Banff classification system.

C4d immunostaining in the peritubular capillaries (PTC) is a marker of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). We evaluated the histopathologic diagnoses of 388 renal transplant biopsies since the implementation of routine C4d immunostaining at our center. Of these, 155 (40%) biopsies had evidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR), out of which 119 (77%) had pure ACR, 31 (20%) had ACR with concomitant features of AMR, and five (3%) had ACR with focal C4d staining. Sixty-four (16%) biopsies exhibited features of AMR [33 (52%) pure AMR, and 31(48%) concomitant AMR and ACR]. One hundred and fifty-five (40%) biopsies had features of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). Of these, 20 (13%) had concomitant AMR [13 (8.5%) had pure AMR and seven (4.5%) had concomitant ACR and AMR]. Creatinine at the time of biopsy was higher in patients with mixed ACR and AMR and the clinical behavior of mixed lesions is more aggressive over time. Despite having a lower serum creatinine at the time of biopsy, patients with IFTA experienced gradual decline in graft function over time. The pathologic findings in renal allograft biopsies are often mixed and mixed lesions appear to have more aggressive clinical behavior. These findings suggest the need for change in the Banff classification system to better capture the complexity of renal allograft pathologies.     

Emerging Concepts and Controversies in Renal Pathology: C4d-Negative and Arterial Lesions as Manifestations of Antibody-Mediated Transplant Rejection

The consensus classification of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of renal allografts developed at the Sixth Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology, in 2001, identified three findings necessary for the diagnosis of active AMR: histologic evidence, antibodies against the graft, and capillary C4d deposition. Morphologic and molecular studies have noted evidence of microvascular injury, which, in the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) but the absence of C4d deposition, is associated with development of transplant glomerulopathy and graft loss. Recent studies suggest that intimal arteritis may in some cases be a manifestation of DSA-induced graft injury. These newly recognized lesions of AMR have now been incorporated into a revised Banff diagnostic schema.     

C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts: evidence for its existence and effect on graft survival

The use of C4d staining as a tissue marker for humoral immunity has served an important role in allowing pathologists to more accurately diagnose acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in renal and other allograft biopsies, and also to recognize the contribution of humoral immunity to lesions of chronic renal allograft rejection, including transplant glomerulopathy. However, while C4d remains a specific marker of a humoral response, recent evidence indicates that a considerable fraction of renal allograft biopsies showing antibody-mediated injury are C4d-negative, even by immunofluorescence. This review summarizes the current evidence supporting the existence of C4d-negative AMR, as well as evidence that this entity may, if untreated, lead to the development of scarring within the graft, transplant glomerulopathy and even graft loss.     

Significance of low-level DSA detected by solid-phase assay in association with acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection

We sought to clarify the controversial issue of whether detecting low‐level anti‐donor‐specific HLA antibody (HLA‐DSA) by single‐antigen flow‐bead assay (SAFB) may have a potential role in reducing acute and chronic antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR). We retrospectively studied the preoperative serum of ABO‐compatible living kidney transplantation recipients transplanted between 2001 and 2004 by SAFB using a Luminex platform. HLA‐DSA was detected only by SAFB in 24 patients, although all of them showed negative T‐cell and B‐cell complement‐dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatches. The HLA‐DSA patients went on to have surprisingly high levels of acute and chronic AMR despite being only weakly sensitized (acute AMR, 33.3%; chronic AMR, 41.7%). After 2005, we implemented SAFB routinely and any patient having a positive HLA‐DSA was considered to be a desensitization candidate. The 52 patients found to have HLA‐DSA underwent kidney transplantation after prior treatment with a single dose of rituximab (RIT) and three or four sessions of double‐filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) in addition to regimens commonly used between 2001 and 2004. After 2005, there was a significant reduction in the occurrence of acute and chronic AMR (acute AMR, 4.7%, P < 0.001; chronic AMR, 4.7%, P < 0.001). The 5‐year graft survival rate also improved after implementing SAFB (83.3–98.1%, P = 0.032). The RIT/DFPP‐induction protocol may improve graft survival even in patients with low‐level DSA.