Treatment of oral erosive lichen planus with 1% pimecrolimus cream: a double-blind, randomized, prospective trial with measurement of pimecrolimus levels in the blood

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of 1% pimecrolimus cream in treating oral erosive lichen planus and to assess its tolerance. DESIGN: Double-blind randomized trial with placebo control. SETTING: Outpatients of the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Nice, from December 21, 2004, to April 19, 2005. PATIENTS: Fourteen consecutive patients with oral erosive lichen planus confirmed by histological examination and with a clinical score superior to 3. Of the 14 patients, 2 did not meet the inclusion criteria and 12 were enrolled in the trial. INTERVENTION: The intervention was 1% pimecrolimus cream or its vehicle, which was applied on ulcerated lesions twice a day for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The efficacy of the treatment was quantified using a 12-point clinical score. The blood level of pimecrolimus was analyzed on days 0 (baseline), 14, and 28. RESULTS: In the placebo group, the mean score was 4.67 on day 0 vs 3.33 on day 28 (P = .22). In the pimecrolimus group, the mean score was 6.83 on day 0 vs 3.33 on day 28 (P = .04). In the pimecrolimus group, blood concentrations of pimecrolimus were always above the threshold (mean value, 2.84 ng/mL; extreme values, 0-6.19 ng/mL). Pimecrolimus cream was well tolerated, and only transient burning sensations were reported by some subjects. Each of the patients in the pimecrolimus group whose condition improved subsequently relapsed when assessed 1 month after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The 1% pimecrolimus cream seems to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for oral erosive lichen planus. The finding of systemic levels of pimecrolimus after mucosal applications necessitates long-term study because it seems that long-term application is required to maintain clinical improvement.     

Blood concentrations, tolerability and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% in Japanese infants and children with atopic dermatitis

Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a topical calcineurin inhibitor for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Minimal systemic exposure to pimecrolimus has been previously observed in Caucasian pediatric patients treated with the cream twice daily for up to 1 year. The objective of this open-label, non-comparative, multicenter study was to assess the systemic exposure, tolerability and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% when used twice daily for 3 weeks in pediatric patients of Japanese background. The patient cohort consisted of 17 Japanese infants and children (age range, 3.6 months to 11.6 years) with atopic dermatitis of at least mild severity affecting >or=10% of the total body surface area (range, 10-48%). Pimecrolimus cream 1% was applied twice daily for 3 weeks. Blood levels of pimecrolimus were determined on days 1, 10 and 22. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring adverse events, laboratory parameters, physical condition and vital signs. Efficacy parameters included the Eczema Area and Severity Index, the Investigators' Global Assessment and the pruritus score. The median exposure to pimecrolimus cream 1% was 22 treatment days (range, 9-29 treatment days). Pimecrolimus blood concentrations were <0.5 ng/mL in 94% of samples on day 1, in 93% of samples on day 10 and in 100% of samples on day 22, with no indication of an increase with increasing body surface area treated (up to 48% of the total body surface area). No drug-related systemic adverse events or serious adverse events were reported. Treatment was effective according to all efficacy parameters. The findings of this study indicate that the use of pimecrolimus cream 1% results in minimal systemic absorption of the active ingredient in pediatric patients of Japanese background with extensive disease.     

Pimecrolimus cream 1% is effective in asteatotic eczema: results of a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study in 40 patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pimecrolimus cream 1% is an effective treatment for atopic eczema. The aim was to investigate its efficacy in asteatotic eczema, a skin disease similar to atopic eczema and its associated dry skin and itching. METHODS: Single-centre, randomized, double-blind, vehicle controlled study in 40 patients with asteatotic eczema. Efficacy was assessed by eczema area and severity index (EASI), investigators global assessment (IGA), patient's self-assessment, and pruritus severity. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment, EASI, the primary efficacy variable, was reduced by 62+/-7% from baseline in patients on pimecrolimus, compared to 21+/-14% in patients on vehicle (P=0.013). With pimecrolimus there was also a better control of pruritus (P=0.042) at week 4 whereas a better control of disease according to self-assessment could only be observed at weeks 2 (P=0.01) and week 3 (P=0.08). CONCLUSION: Pimecrolimus cream 1% is effective in patients with asteatotic eczema.     

Low systemic absorption and good tolerability of pimecrolimus, administered as 1% cream (Elidel) in infants with atopic dermatitis--a multicenter, 3-week, open-label study

Pimecrolimus cream 1%, a nonsteroid inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines, offers an alternative to corticosteroids in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Here we evaluate pimecrolimus blood concentrations and tolerability to pimecrolimus cream 1% in 22 infants below 2 years of age with atopic dermatitis (10-92% body surface area affected at baseline). Efficacy was assessed as a secondary objective. Pimecrolimus cream 1% was applied twice daily for 3 weeks. Blood concentrations were low, typically (96% of total 100 concentrations measured) below 2 ng/mL, the majority (71%) remaining below 0.5 ng/mL. The highest concentration observed was 2.26 ng/mL. At steady state, there was no indication of accumulation. Pimecrolimus was well tolerated locally and systemically, with no serious adverse events recorded. Most adverse events recorded (35 in 17/22 patients) were typical of the young pediatric population studied, of mild to moderate severity, and not considered to be study-medication related, with the exception of four local adverse effects limited to the site of cream application. No clinically relevant change was observed in physical examination, vital signs, or laboratory safety parameters. A rapid onset of therapeutic effect was observed within the first four days of treatment. Pimecrolimus cream 1% is well tolerated in infants 3 to 23 months of age treated for 3 weeks, and results in minimal systemic exposure.     

Use of pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel) in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in infants and children: the effects of ethnic origin and baseline disease severity on treatment outcome

BACKGROUND: Pimecrolimus cream 1%, a cell-selective inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines, has been shown to be effective in treating atopic dermatitis (AD). This report examines the effect of ethnic origin and baseline disease severity on treatment outcomes in pediatric patients with AD treated with pimecrolimus cream 1%. METHODS: The analysis included 589 patients aged 3 months to 17 years from three 6-week, randomized, multicenter studies of similar design. Patients were treated with pimecrolimus cream 1% or vehicle twice daily. Efficacy, safety and tolerability in Caucasian and non-Caucasian groups were compared. In addition, the effect of baseline disease severity on treatment outcome was investigated. RESULTS: A total of 321 Caucasian and 268 non-Caucasian patients [Blacks, Asians and others (including Hispanics)] with mild, moderate or severe disease at baseline were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the pimecrolimus and vehicle control groups and between Caucasian and non-Caucasian groups. Significantly higher efficacy [measured by Investigators' Global Assessment and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores] was achieved in the pimecrolimus-treated group, compared with the vehicle group, irrespective of ethnic origin. Baseline disease severity had no effect on treatment outcome: patients with both mild and moderate AD responded well to pimecrolimus (absolute change from baseline in EASI score -2.60 and -5.48, respectively; both P < 0.001). Pimecrolimus cream 1% was safe and well tolerated in all ethnic groups and at all levels of disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic origin and baseline disease severity had no effect on treatment outcome with pimecrolimus cream 1% in patients with AD.     

Low systemic exposure after repeated topical application of Pimecrolimus (Elidel), SD Z ASM 981) in patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND: Pimecrolimus is a cell-selective inhibitor of inflammatory cytokine release developed specifically for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate blood concentrations and tolerability of pimecrolimus during topical treatment. METHODS: Twelve adult patients with extensive atopic dermatitis were enrolled in an open-label, noncontrolled, pharmacokinetic study. The patients were treated twice daily for 3 weeks with pimecrolimus cream 1% on all lesions. Pimecrolimus blood concentrations were measured at regular time points, and the safety and tolerability were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: In 78% of the 444 blood samples evaluated, pimecrolimus concentrations remained below the limit of quantitation (0.5 ng/ml). The highest concentration measured was 1.4 ng/ml. There was no indication of drug accumulation. Pimecrolimus was well tolerated locally and systemically. CONCLUSION: The 3-week twice daily treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% results in consistently low pimecrolimus blood concentrations with no accumulation. Pimecrolimus cream appears suitable for the long-term management of atopic dermatitis.     

Pimecrolimus cream in the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in adults: a six-month study

BACKGROUND: Pimecrolimus cream (Elidel, SDZ ASM 981), a non-steroid inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines, is effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). We assessed whether early treatment of AD signs/symptoms reduces the need for topical corticosteroids. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in the long-term management of adult AD. METHODS: 192 adults with moderate to severe AD were randomised (1:1) for twice daily (b.i.d.) treatment of early signs or symptoms of AD with either pimecrolimus cream 1% or vehicle cream (control group) to prevent progression to flares. Treatment was given as needed for 24 weeks. In the event of flares, a moderately potent corticosteroid (prednicarbate 0.25% cream) was permitted as rescue medication in both groups. The percentage of days on which a topical corticosteroid was used to treat disease flares was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: Corticosteroid medication was used on 14.2% (95% confidence interval, CI: 8.3-21.1) of the days of the 24-week treatment period in the pimecrolimus group and on 37.2% (95% CI: 30.4-44.0) of the days in the control group (p < 0.001). In total, 44.8% (43/96) of patients in the pimecrolimus group did not experience a flare compared with 18.8% (18/96) of patients in the control group. The median time to first flare was 144 days in the pimecrolimus group and 26 days in the control group (p < 0.001). Pimecrolimus treatment was also associated with improvement in signs and symptoms of AD, pruritus, patients' self-assessment and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Pimecrolimus cream 1% b.i.d. is an effective, well-tolerated, long-term treatment for AD in adults, substantially reducing the number of flares compared to a conventional therapy and consequently reducing or eliminating the need for corticosteroid treatment.     

Long-term efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in adults with moderate atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND: Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a non-steroid, selective inflammatory cytokine inhibitor indicated for atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1%-based treatment versus conventional therapy in adults with moderate AD. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive pimecrolimus cream 1% (n = 62) or vehicle (n = 68) at the first signs/symptoms of AD, for 24 weeks as required. A moderately potent topical corticosteroid (prednicarbate 0.25% cream) was allowed in both groups to treat flares. RESULTS: Corticosteroids were required on fewer days in the pimecrolimus group, compared with the vehicle group (9.7 vs. 37.8%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, 59.7% of pimecrolimus-treated patients experienced no flares during the study period, compared with 22.1% of vehicle-treated patients (p < 0.001). Pimecrolimus cream 1% was well tolerated throughout the study. CONCLUSION: For adults with moderate AD, pimecrolimus cream 1% is well tolerated, reduces the incidence of flares, reduces/eliminates corticosteroid use, improves long-term disease control and enhances the patients' quality of life.     

Occlusive treatment of chronic hand dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1% results in low systemic exposure,is well tolerated,safe, and effective. An open study

BACKGROUND: Pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel, SDZ ASM 981) is a novel, non-steroid inflammatory cytokine inhibitor, effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Here, we evaluate the treatment of chronic hand dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1%. OBJECTIVES: To determine pimecrolimus blood concentrations, and evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy following application of pimecrolimus cream 1% to subjects with chronic hand dermatitis. METHOD: In this open-label, multiple-topical-dose, non-controlled, pharmacokinetic study, pimecrolimus cream 1% was applied twice daily to dorsal and palmar areas (affected and unaffected) of both hands. Evening applications (except day 8) were immediately followed by overnight occlusion (> or =6 h). Full pharmacokinetic profile (days 1, 8 and 22), trough concentrations (days 3 and 15), physical examinations, laboratory measurements and adverse events were recorded. Efficacy was assessed via Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA), total key signs and symptoms and the subject's overall self-assessment. RESULTS: Twelve patients completed the study. The majority of pimecrolimus blood concentrations (73.6%) remained below the limit of quantitation (0.1 ng/ml). The maximum concentration observed was 0.91 ng/ml and the maximum area under the concentration-time curve from 0-12 h post dose was 7.6 ng.h/ml. Treatment was well tolerated locally and systemically. No serious adverse events occurred; 4/13 subjects showed a total of 6 adverse events at the application site: burning (n=4), and pruritus (n=2). No clinically relevant or drug-related changes were observed. Clear efficacy of the treatment was shown by all 3 assessment methods. Disease state at day 22 had improved in 11 (85%) subjects compared with baseline (IGA). CONCLUSION: Twice daily topical treatment of moderate to severe chronic hand dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1% results in low pimecrolimus blood levels, is well tolerated, safe, and effective.     

A comparison of metronidazole 1% cream and pimecrolimus 1% cream in the treatment of patients with papulopustular rosacea: a randomized open‐label clinical trial

Background. There are various treatment options available for rosacea, depending on the subtype, but treatment is still generally unsatisfactory. Some reports have indicated beneficial effects of topical pimecrolimus. Aim. To compare the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus 1% cream and metronidazole 1% cream in the treatment of patients with papulopustular rosacea (PR). Methods. A group of 49 patients with PR was investigated in this single‐centre, randomized, open‐label study. Patients were randomly assigned treatment with either pimecrolimus 1% cream or metronidazole 1% cream for 12 weeks. Response was evaluated by the inflammatory lesion count, the severity of facial erythema and telangiectasia, Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA), and safety and tolerability at baseline and at weeks 3, 6, 9 and 12. Results. In total, 48 patients completed the study. Both treatments were very effective in the treatment of PR. There were no significant differences between the treatments in inflammatory lesion counts, overall erythema severity scores and PGA evaluated from baseline to week 12 (P > 0.05). Neither treatment produced any clinically relevant improvement in telangiectasia. Conclusion. Pimecrolimus cream is no more efficacious than metronidazole cream in the treatment of PR.     

An exploratory study to evaluate the efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% for the treatment of pityriasis alba

BACKGROUND: Use of topical corticosteroids for the treatment of pityriasis alba is limited by their potential side-effects, such as skin atrophy especially with long-term use on the face. Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a topical calcineurin inhibitor that has anti-inflammatory properties, lacks the cutaneous side-effects associated with steroids, and provide a potential benefit for the treatment of pityriasis alba. METHODS: This 10-patient, prospective, single-arm, open-label, single-center, 12-week, investigator-initiated proof of concept study assessed the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptance of pimecrolimus cream 1% twice daily. In addition to pimecrolimus cream, patients used facial emollient containing SPF 15 sunscreen and mild soap-free cleanser. Efficacy assessments were Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) of disease severity and evaluation of uneven skin color, scaling, eczema, follicular keratosis, and pruritus. All efficacy assessments were reported on a 4-point scale (0 = none to 3 = severe). RESULTS: Of the 10 patients enrolled (aged: 12-35 years), all had intensive sun-exposure, 90% had skin type IV-V, and 80% completed the 12-week treatment. At baseline, mean IGA was 1.20 (mild-moderate), uneven skin color was 2.3 (moderate-severe) and scaling was 1.2 (mild). IGA decreased to 0.25 by week 12, uneven skin color improved by week 3 with near complete resolution by week 12 (mean = 0.38) and scaling resolved at week 3. Pruritus, eczema, and follicular keratosis remained at low levels from baseline throughout the course of the study. Patients consistently reported satisfaction with the treatment ("satisfied" or "very satisfied"). No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Pimecrolimus cream 1% may represent an alternative for the treatment of pityriasis alba.     

Safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% in the daily practice: Results of a patient self‐observation study in patients with atopic dermatitis

Background: Pimecrolimus cream 1% has proven to be well‐tolerated and effective in controlled clinical studies in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). In a 15‐week patient self‐observation study, safety and efficacy was investigated in the daily practice. Patients and methods: 3502 patients with AD (mean age 26.2 ± 18 years, 62% female) received pimecrolimus cream 1% from 810 physicians in the German Federal Republic.The severity of the disease was assessed at baseline, two times during the 15‐week observation period and at the end of treatment.Patients recorded daily the degree of erythema and pruritus. At the end of treatment, safety and efficacy were assessed by the physician based on patient's daily records and by the patient. Results: The percentage of patients with severe or massive AD decreased from 25% to 7%, whereas the percentage of patients without or with mild symptoms increased from 9% to 55%.The efficacy of treatment was rated by physicians as good or very good in 83.5% of cases and by 79% of patients.At baseline 35% of the patients were free of flares as compared to 75% at the end of therapy. Disease control was better in patients who followed the recommended treatment algorithm for pimecrolimus cream.Tolerability was mostly rated as good or very good. Conclusion: Treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% for patients with AD is well‐tolerated and effective in daily practice.     

Pimecrolimus cream 1%: a potential new treatment for chronic hand dermatitis

A multicenter, randomized, vehicle-controlled, 3-week study was conducted in patients with chronic hand dermatitis (HD) of various etiologies and locations to identify subgroups particularly responsive to twice-daily application of pimecrolimus cream 1% with overnight occlusion. A total of 294 patients were randomized to the study. By the final visit on day 22, there was a trend toward greater clearance in patients who received pimecrolimus than in those treated with vehicle cream. An analysis of treatment success by various stratification factors was performed, and it was found that palmar involvement had notable impact on response (P = .033). Patients in the pimecrolimus group continued to improve throughout the study; however, in the vehicle group, improvement plateaued after 15 days. Pimecrolimus was well tolerated, with a low rate of application-site reactions such as burning. Pimecrolimus cream 1%, when used twice daily with overnight occlusion, may be of benefit in the management of chronic HD.     

Pimecrolimus 1% cream for oral erosive lichen planus: a 6‐week randomized,double‐blind,vehicle‐controlled study with a 6‐week open‐label extension to assess efficacy and safety

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of topical pimecrolimus 1% cream in the treatment of oral erosive lichen planus. Design A 6‐week randomized, double‐blind, vehicle‐controlled phase followed by a 6‐week open‐label phase. Setting Outpatients of the Department of Dermatology, University of Utah. Patients Twenty‐one patients with oral erosive lichen planus were randomized and treated with either pimecrolimus 1% cream or vehicle cream. Intervention Pimecrolimus 1% cream, or its vehicle, were applied twice daily for 6 weeks to each side of the mouth with a 2 × 2 inch gauze pad folded in half and placed directly on the erosive lesion. Main Outcome Measures Efficacy was based on clinical evaluation of Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) of the overall severity of the disease, erythema, measurement of the size of any target erosion in millimetres, and assessment of spontaneous pain. Blood levels of pimecrolimus were monitored in all subjects on day 0 and repeated on day 7. Results Pimecrolimus 1% cream was superior to vehicle cream in reducing mean IGA, pain, and erosion size. For the vehicle group that entered the open‐label phase, pimecrolimus 1% cream improved the mean IGA, pain, erosion size, and erythema. Pimecrolimus levels were detected in nine out of 10 of the pimecrolimus‐treated subjects. These levels were consistently low. The pimecrolimus cream was well‐tolerated. No clinically relevant, drug‐related adverse events were reported. Conclusion Pimecrolimus 1% cream was superior to vehicle in reducing pain, erythema, decreasing erosion size, and improving overall severity of disease when compared with vehicle treatment.     

A randomized controlled trial of pimecrolimus cream 1% in adolescents and adults with head and neck atopic dermatitis and intolerant of, or dependent on, topical corticosteroids

BACKGROUND: There is a need for alternative treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) of the face and neck as long-term use of topical corticosteroids (TCS) is associated with skin atrophy and telangiectasia and some patients develop allergy, intolerance or other side-effects. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in patients with AD of the face and neck who are either dependent on, or intolerant of, TCS. METHODS: A 12-week study comprising a 6-week, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled phase was conducted, followed by a 6-week, open-label phase. Two hundred patients aged 12 years or over with mild to moderate head and neck AD, intolerant of, or dependent on, TCS were randomized to either pimecrolimus cream or vehicle cream. The primary efficacy criterion was the facial investigator's global assessment score at 6 weeks. Secondary efficacy criteria were head and neck Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), pruritus score and eyelid dermatitis. Facial skin atrophy and telangiectasia were assessed with dermatoscopy. RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage of patients treated with pimecrolimus was cleared or almost cleared of facial AD compared with vehicle (47% vs. 16%, respectively). A statistically significant difference was also seen on head and neck EASI and pruritus score. Significantly more pimecrolimus-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients achieved clearance of eyelid dermatitis (45% vs. 19%, respectively). Among the 77 patients with skin atrophy at baseline, treatment with pimecrolimus was associated with a reversal in skin thinning. Of the 112 patients with telangiectasia at baseline, no statistically significant difference was seen between treatment groups. Adverse events occurred with similar frequency in both groups. CONCLUSION: Pimecrolimus cream 1% is effective in patients with head and neck dermatitis intolerant of, or dependent on, TCS. Reversion of skin atrophy may occur during TCS-free intervals.     

An open-label pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically applied pimecrolimus cream for the treatment of steroid-induced rosacea-like eruption

BACKGROUND: Steroid-induced rosacea-like eruption is characterized by facial rosacea-like dermatitis in patients that have been treated with topical steroids for relatively long periods. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of 1% pimecrolimus topical cream for steroid-induced rosacea-like eruption. METHODS: In an open-label pilot study, 40 patients were enrolled and instructed to apply 1% pimecrolimus cream twice daily for 6 weeks. Patients were evaluated by a rosacea clinical score, investigator's global assessment, overall erythema severity, and tolerability at weeks 0, 2, and 6. RESULTS: In 35 patients, the rosacea clinical score decreased significantly from 16.0+/-4.3 at baseline to 8.1+/-3.3 at week 2 and 4.2+/-2.5 at week 6 (P<0.0001). Investigator's global assessment was 4.1+/-1.1 (baseline), then decreased to 1.4+/-0.8 (week 2) and 0.5+/-0.6 (week 6) (P<0.0001). By week 6, 48.6% of the patients were clear. Overall erythema severity was 2.4+/-0.7 (baseline), 0.9+/-0.4 (week 2), and 0.3+/-0.4 (week 6) (P<0.0001). Cutaneous adverse events (local burning, stinging, and itching) occurred in 17.5%. CONCLUSION: Pimecrolimus cream might be efficacious, safe, and well tolerated for steroid-induced rosacea-like eruption. The small sample size and open label nature of this study is its limitation. Further double-blind, vehicle-controlled studies are needed.     

Treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% clears irritant dermatitis of the periocular region, face and neck

Background  Irritant dermatitis of the face and neck is particularly prevalent in women ≥ 30 years old, who typically present with periocular cutaneous symptoms. Current therapies are limited, indicating a need for rapid, effective alternatives. Pimecrolimus cream 1%, a nonsteroid, cell-selective inhibitor of inflammatory-cytokine release, is effective in the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases, such as chronic irritant dermatitis of the hands, and thus offers a potential therapeutic option for this indication. This study reports on the safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus treatment in patients with irritant periocular dermatitis, extending to the face and neck in some patients.
Methods  Twenty-seven patients with periocular irritant dermatitis (extending onto the face and neck in eight) were treated twice daily with pimecrolimus cream 1% for 7 d, followed by once-daily application for a further 7 d. Erythema, swelling, and pruritus were assessed at baseline, weeks 1–4 using a 4-point clinical score (0, absent; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe).
Results  All patients showed marked improvement within 2–3 d of treatment with disease clearance in 23 of 27 patients within 14 d. In the remaining four patients, mild relapse occurred at weeks 3–4, but improvement was observed following a further 10-d treatment. Side-effects were mild and transient.
Conclusion  Pimecrolimus cream 1% provides a new potential option for treatment of irritant dermatitis of the periocular region, head and neck. Further double-blind, controlled studies are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% for this indication.     

Pimecrolimus 1% cream in the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus in postmenopausal women

Background Vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS), a poorly recognized chronic inflammatory skin disease, may represent a therapeutic challenge. Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a nonsteroidal, selective inflammatory cytokine inhibitor that has recently been indicated for some inflammatory cutaneous diseases. Objective To investigate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of 1% pimecrolimus cream therapy in postmenopausal women with LS. Methods A total of 16 patients applied pimecrolimus cream 1% twice a day over the first 3 months and then as required. All the patients completed this study and were then followed up over the next 12 months. The symptoms and clinical appearance of the lesions in every subject were recorded before and after treatment using a severity scale. Results Using pimecrolimus, most of the patients exhibited a significant improvement with respect to symptoms and the clinical appearance of the disease. After 3 months of treatment, complete remission was seen in 11 patients, partial remission in four, whereas one patient experienced no response at all. Over the subsequent 12 months of follow‐up, 10 patients exhibited complete remission while five had partial remission. Four cases with complete remission experienced a few relapses during the follow‐up period. Older patients and those with an advanced stage of the disease responded poorly. No significant side effects were observed. Conclusions Pimecrolimus cream 1% appears to be an effective and well‐tolerated therapeutic alternative option in the treatment of early stage of vulvar LS. Pimecrolimus may reduce the incidence of flare ups, improve long‐term disease control, and enhance the patients’ quality of life, especially in postmenopausal women.     

Control of atopic eczema with pimecrolimus cream 1% under daily practice conditions: results of a > 2000 patient study

Background Pimecrolimus cream 1% has been shown to effectively control atopic eczema (AE) when applied twice daily from the first signs or symptoms of AE until clearance. Moreover, pimecrolimus cream 1% has a favourable safety profile, lacking topical corticosteroid‐related side‐effects such as skin atrophy, making it particularly useful to treat delicate body regions (e.g. the face). Objective The objective of this naturalistic study was to monitor the safety, tolerability and efficacy of pimecrolimus when used in the long‐term management of AE in a real‐life setting. Methods A multicentre, open‐label study was conducted in 2034 patients aged ≥ 3 months with mild to moderate AE for up to 12 months’ duration. Patients applied pimecrolimus cream twice daily, initiating treatment at first signs or symptoms of AE, continuing until clearance. Results Patients (n= 1847; 91%) completed 3 months of the study. Treatment success (clear or almost clear AE) after 3 months of treatment was observed on the whole body in 59% of patients and on the face in 81% of patients. Disease improvement of whole body and face was seen in 77% and 63% of patients, respectively. Pruritus was absent or mild in 79% of patients. Pimecrolimus cream was well tolerated throughout the study. Conclusion In a daily practice setting, pimecrolimus cream 1% effectively and safely controls AE.     

Pimecrolimus

Pimecrolimus (Elidel) is a topically active, nonsteroid, calcineurin inhibitor that has shown efficacy in controlling symptoms of atopic dermatitis in adult and pediatric patients. Topical pimecrolimus 1% cream is approved in the US for the short-term and intermittent long-term treatment of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis in non-immunocompromised patients aged >/=2 years who do not respond well to, or may have adverse effects with, conventional treatments. Pimecrolimus 1% cream is an effective and well tolerated treatment for atopic dermatitis in infants, children, adolescents, and adults. Pimecrolimus is effective at reducing the incidence of disease flares and, thus, the need for rescue treatment with topical corticosteroids. The drug also improves the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) of children and adolescents, and improves the QOL of parents of children with atopic dermatitis. Furthermore, pimecrolimus does not cause skin atrophy, a problem commonly associated with topical corticosteroids, and is not associated with clinically relevant systemic adverse events. Thus, topical pimecrolimus 1% cream is an effective treatment option for the management of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.