Metoclopramide,domperidone and dopamine in man: actions and interactions

Summary The effects of oral doses of the dopamine antagonist antiemetics metoclopramide and domperidone on baseline and dopamine stimulated renal function and systemic haemodynamics were assessed in a placebo controlled crossover study in 9 healthy volunteers.Metoclopramide did not change baseline ERPF, GFR or FF over 2 h post dosing but it significantly reduced baseline U_NaV, U_KV, urine flow, urinary dopamine excretion, supine and erect diastolic blood pressure and supine systolic blood pressure. Domperidone and placebo did not cause these effects.Metoclopramide caused a marked rise and domperidone a small fall in plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) but placebo was without effect. Neither antiemetic altered plasma renin activity (PRA) but a small fall occurred with placebo.Two hours after pretreatment with placebo dopamine (2 g/kg/min) increased effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), sodium excretion rate (U_NaV), urine flow rate, urinary dopamine excretion rate, supine systolic blood pressure and supine and erect pulse rate and decreased the potassium excretion rate (U_KV), filtration fraction (FF) and supine diastolic blood pressure.Metoclopramide pretreatment, did not attenuate the dopamine induced rise in ERPF, GFR, urine flow, urinary dopamine excretion or supine systolic blood pressure but it did attenuate the rise in pulse rate, the fall in diastolic pressure, and the antikaliuretic effect of dopamine leading to a net kaliuresis when compared to placebo. Domperidone was similar to placebo.Neither metoclopramide nor domperidone given orally caused clinically important antagonism of the renal haemodynamic effects of dopamine. However the effects of metoclopramide on blood pressure and electrolyte excretion may have clinical importance.Metoclopramide has significant pharmacodynamic effects which are probably not due to DA₂ antagonism but may be mediated by DA₁ antagonism or be non-specific.Abbreviations DA dopamine - ERPF effective renal plasma flow - FF filtration fraction - GFR glomerular filtration rate - PAC plasma aldosterone concentration - PRA plasma renin activity - UV urine flow rate - U_NaV urinary sodium excretion rate (natriuresis) - U_KV urinary potassium excretion rate (kaliuresis) - HPLC high performance liquid chromatography.     

Effect of carvedilol on renal hemodynamics and renal excretory function in spontaneously hypertensive rats

The effects of the novel antihypertensive agent, carvedilol, on renal hemodynamics and excretory function have been investigated and compared with the effects of labetalol in conscious, spontaneously hypertensive rats. Sustained intravenous infusion of carvedilol or labetalol at a rate of 10 micrograms/kg/min resulted in a significant decrease in blood pressure which was equivalent in magnitude for both drugs. Carvedilol had no effect on renal hemodynamic parameters; glomerular filtration rate, renal blood flow, and filtration fraction were unchanged. In contrast, labetalol decreased the glomerular filtration rate by 13% (p less than 0.01) and the filtration fraction was reduced from 28 to 24%. Inasmuch as renal blood flow was unchanged and perfusion pressure was reduced, both compounds decreased renal vascular resistance. Urine flow decreased and osmolality increased with both carvedilol and labetalol. However, excretion of electrolytes was affected differently with the two compounds. While sodium and potassium excretion were significantly decreased with labetalol, sodium and potassium excretion remained stable during carvedilol infusion, which represents an important beneficial effect for a potent systemic vasodilator. We conclude, therefore, that carvedilol does not compromise the renal autoregulatory integrity in hypertensive rats, and that the antihypertensive activity of the compound is associated with an apparent 'renal sparing' effect, in that the decrease in blood pressure does not compromise the urinary excretion of sodium.     

Acute and chronic effects of a new calcium inhibitor, nicardipine, on renal hemodynamics in hypertension

Renal hemodynamics and natriuresis were studied in 10 hypertensive patients without renal failure, 2 and 4 h after oral intake of 30 mg nicardipine; then, nicardipine was given at a dose of 30 mg three times a day and the hemodynamic study was repeated on the 6th day (2 h after the morning dose). The first dose of nicardipine produced an increase in renal blood flow (from 888 +/- 45 to 999 +/- 59 ml/min 1.73 m2, p less than 0.01) and a decrease in renal vascular resistances (from 0.16 +/- 0.01 to 0.12 +/- 0.01 arbitrary unit, p less than 0.05). Glomerular filtration rate did not change and the decrease in filtration fraction was not significant. Sodium excretion increased markedly during the first 2 h (from 0.17 +/- 0.04 to 0.29 +/- 0.06 mmol/min, p less than 0.05). On the 6th day renal vascular resistances and filtration fraction remained lowered whereas glomerular filtration rate was unchanged. Nicardipine did not produce any significant alteration in plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone after acute or chronic administration. These results confirm the potent renal vasodilatory effect of nicardipine; glomerular filtration rate was not significantly altered whereas renal blood flow and filtration fraction returned to normal levels. An early and transient natriuretic effect was observed after the first dose of nicardipine, and body weight showed a significant decrease during the study indicating that no sodium retention was induced by nicardipine.     

Effects of amlodipine on renal haemodynamics in mild to moderate hypertensive patients

Summary In this study the efficacy and safety of short-term amlodipine administration on renal haemodynamics were evaluated in mild to moderate hypertensive subjects. Our final goal was to evaluate whether the reduced blood pressure induced by treatment was associated with maintenance of renal function.After a run-in period with placebo, 30 hypertensive patients without cardiac or renal diseases were randomly allocated to a double-blind 4 weeks controlled study with amlodipine 10 mg once a day (15 patients) or placebo (15 patients).Renal haemodynamic measurements included effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by radionuclide study using ¹³¹I-hippuran and ^99mTc, with methods described by Schlegel and Gates, respectively. In addition, effective renal blood flow [ERBF=ERPF/(1-Ht)], filtration fraction (FF=GFR/ERPF) ERPF) and renal vascular resistance (RVR=MBP×80/ERBF) were calculated. Plasma renin activity (PRA), serum aldosterone (ALD) and urinary excretion of sodium (NaU) were evaluated.At the end of amlodipine administration a significant decrease (P<0.001) in SBP, DBP and MBP from baseline values was observed. A significant decrease (P<0.01) in RVR and significant increases (P<0.05) in ERPF, ERBF and in NaU were also found, without relevant changes in GFR, FF, PRA and ALD.No significant variation in clinical and renal measurements was observed in the placebo group.No relevant side effects were observed in either group. In conclusion, amlodipine was effective in lowering blood pressure in mild to moderate hypertension and exerted favourable effects on renal haemodynamics and function.     

Effects of rilmenidine on stress-induced peak blood pressure and renal function.

Rilmenidine is an imidazoline I1-receptor agonist that centrally acts by reducing the sympathetic tone. There is strong experimental evidence that natriuresis could be evoked by proximal tubular I1-receptors that have also been isolated in human kidneys. However, in humans, the natriuretic effects of proximal tubular I1-receptors have never been demonstrated. Because stress tests elicited a sympathetically mediated increase in blood pressure and in sodium reabsorption, this study examined whether a short-term infusion of rilmenidine (1 mg) may interfere with stress-induced cardiovascular response and renal sodium handling in normotensive men, in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study. The stress test used is an efficient and reproducible computerized version of the Stroop's stress test. During the experimental sessions, both basal and stress renal functional parameters were determined: glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, filtration fraction, sodium excretion, and segmental sodium tubular reabsorption (lithium clearance). During the placebo phase, stress induced a significant increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP; 22.2+/-10.1 mm Hg) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP; 11.0+/-5.0 mm Hg). During stress, glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow tended to decrease, resulting in a nonsignificant increase in filtration fraction. Despite the increase in BP, stress induced a significant decrease in sodium excretion that was due mainly to a nonsignificant increase in sodium reabsorption in the proximal parts of the tubules. Rilmenidine significantly reduced rest and stress BP, but the cardiovascular reactivity to stress was not altered. The treatment slightly decreased basal glomerular filtration rate and increased renal plasma flow, so that the filtration fraction significantly decreased. The treatment-related decrease in BP was associated with a significant increase in basal sodium reabsorption. Stress-induced modifications in renal function and sodium handling were not altered by the treatment. In conclusion, rilmenidine reduced rest BP and preserved stress-induced reactivity in BP and heart rate. Renal effects of rilmenidine are characterized by a decrease in glomerular filtration rate and in filtration fraction and an increase in sodium reabsorption. The study failed to demonstrate any effect of rilmenidine on stress-induced increase in sodium reabsorption.     

Effect of verapamil on renal plasma flow,glomerular filtration rate and plasma angiotensin II,aldosterone and arginine vasopressin in essential hypertension

Summary Renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate plasma angiotensin II, aldosterone and arginine vasopressin, free water clearance, blood pressure and body weight in 11 patients with mild to moderate hypertension were determined at the end of consecutive 6 week periods of administration of placebo and verapamil up to 120 mg t.i.d. Verpamil induced a 10% reduction in diastolic blood pressure. Compared with placebo none of the other parameters measured changed after treatment with verapamil. There was no significant correlation between blood pressure and arginine vasopressin in plasma. It is concluded that verapamil reduced blood pressure by vasodilatation without activation of the counterbalancing mechanisms commonly seen after treatment with vasodilating drugs, i.e. tachycardia, activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, water and salt retention, and without affecting renal haemodynamics. AVP does not seem to be involved in blood pressure regulation in mild to moderate essential hypertension.     

Acute renal effects of oral felodipine in normal man

Summary The acute renal effects of a single oral dose of felodipine 0.15 mg/kg were studied in 8 healthy males. Thirty minutes after administration the mean plasma concentration was 25.7 nmol/l. There was a significant reduction in diastolic blood pressure (24%) and a concomitant rise in heart rate (38%), leaving the systolic pressure unchanged. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) were measured by the constant infusion technique using the clearance of¹²⁵I-iothalamate and¹³¹I-hippuran respectively. GFR was unchanged and the filtration fraction (FF) was reduced, whilst there was a decrease in renal vascular resistance (RVR). The glomerular filter characteristics were unchanged, as estimated by the unchanged excretion rate of albumin. There was a significant rise in the clearance of sodium (176%) but only a small and insignificant increase in urine volume. Clearance of potassium was decreased. An increase in the clearance of uric acid and a rise in the beta-2-microglobulin excretion rate were found, both suggesting a proximal tubular effect of felodipine. The excretion rate of calcium was increased.     

Acute effects of combined vasodilation and beta-adrenoceptor blockade with prizidilol on renal function.

1 The effects of a single oral dose of 600 mg of prizidilol on renal function were studied 5 to 6 h after dosing in six normal subjects and eight patients with essential hypertension. 2 Mean arterial blood pressure was reduced to 92% of the control value in normal subjects and to 75% in hypertensive patients. Heart rate increased slightly. 3 In normal subjects, effective renal plasma flow was increased to 107% of control values while glomerular filtration rate (83%), filtration fraction (79%), sodium (84%) and potassium (50%) clearances were significantly decreased. 4 In hypertensive subjects, effective renal plasma flow was increased to 120% of control values, while glomerular filtration rate (67%), filtration fraction (57%), sodium (27%) and potassium (72%) clearances were significantly decreased. 5 Plasma noradrenaline increased significantly in normal subjects (150%) and in patients (173%). Plasma renin activity, aldosterone and epinephrine levels did not change consistently. 6 The results indicate that the acute effects of prizidilol on blood pressure and renal function are more marked in hypertensive than in normotensive subjects. Prizidilol increases renal plasma flow like hydralazine and depresses glomerular filtration rate and fractional sodium excretion like endralazine. In addition to the fall in arterial pressure, efferent vasodilation and/or a specific effect on the glomerular ultrafiltration coefficient Kf may account for the striking decrease in filtration fraction.     

A comparison of the chronic effects of oral xamoterol and enalapril on blood pressure and renal function in mild to moderate heart failure.

1. We compared the effects, after 3 weeks oral therapy, of xamoterol 200 mg twice daily and enalapril 2.5, 5 or 10 mg twice daily on home and clinic blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow, stroke and minute distances, linear resistance and on plasma renin activity in 19 patients with mild to moderate heart failure in a single-blind randomised crossover study. 2. Enalapril reduced mean home blood pressure by 17/7 mm Hg compared with xamoterol (P less than 0.0001) and by 19/7 mm Hg compared with placebo. Compared with placebo xamoterol had no effect. Enalapril reduced predose blood pressure, compared with xamoterol, on average by 15/5 mm Hg (P = 0.02 systolic, 0.09 diastolic) and by 20/7 mm Hg compared with placebo. At 4 h post-dose the mean differences were: xamoterol-enalapril 13/10 mm Hg (P = 0.01 systolic, 0.0007 diastolic) and placebo-enalapril 23/9 mm Hg. 3. Stroke and minute distances were marginally less 4 h following xamoterol than following enalapril: mean (s.e. mean) values were 9.4 (0.7) vs 10.4 (0.8) cm (P = 0.23) and 699 (51.7) vs 767 (62.1) cm (P = 0.04) respectively. Linear resistance was reduced by enalapril, from the placebo value of 13.2 (1.2) to 11.0 (0.9) mm Hg m-1 and marginally increased by xamoterol, to 14.2 (1.2) mm Hg m-1, the difference between active treatments being statistically significant (P = 0.03). 4. Renal plasma flow, GFR and filtration fraction were not influenced by enalapril or xamoterol therapy. There were no significant correlations between glomerular filtration rate and either blood pressure or stroke distance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of converting enzyme inhibition on the renal haemodynamic responses to noradrenaline infusion in the rat.

1 The renal haemodynamic responses to a close arterial infusion of noradrenaline (29.7-177.9 nmol kg-1 h-1) were measured in rats anaesthetized with pentobarbitone. Systemic blood pressure was unaffected by noradrenaline infusion at this dose level. Renal blood flow was significantly reduced by 16% while glomerular filtration rate remained unchanged. These responses resulted in a rise in filtration fraction of some 10%. 2 In a separate group of animals, noradrenaline infusion in this manner and at similar dose rate increased plasma renin activity approximately 3 fold. 3 Continuous infusion of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, teprotide (3.36 mumol kg-1 h-1), had no measurable effect on systemic blood pressure, renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate or filtration fraction. 4 Infusion of noradrenaline into these animals receiving teprotide caused a significant fall in renal blood flow of 16%. There was a fall in glomerular filtration rate of some 17% which was significantly different from the response observed in the animals not receiving teprotide. There was a consequent small but insignificant fall in filtration fraction. 5 These data show that the regulation of glomerular filtration rate in response to the vasoconstrictor drug, noradrenaline, is partly mediated via the renin-angiotensin system. They provide evidence for a role of intrarenal angiotensin II in regulating glomerular filtration by causing efferent arteriolar vasoconstriction.     

Nadolol in essential hypertension: effect on ambulatory blood pressure, renal haemodynamics and cardiac function.

Chronic administration of nadolol has been reported to reduce blood pressure either without or with a concomitant fall of renal blood flow. We therefore studied the effects of nadolol 80 mg once daily on ambulatory blood pressure, renal and systemic haemodynamics in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Ten patients took part in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, each phase of which lasted 4 weeks. Nadolol significantly reduced ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate, but had no effect on blood pressure variability. Cardiac output was significantly reduced by nadolol and total peripheral resistance increased but without reaching statistical significance. Despite the fall in blood pressure and cardiac output, renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate remained unchanged. The fraction of cardiac output reaching the kidneys rose significantly and renal vascular resistance was significantly reduced. Body weight, urinary sodium excretion and urine flow rate remained unchanged. We conclude that nadolol 80 mg once daily lowers ambulatory blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate hypertension without impairment of renal blood flow, indicating a redistribution of cardiac output to the kidneys. The mechanism of the renal vasodilator effect of nadolol remains to be determined.     

Clinical effects of intravenous nifedipine on renal function

Nifedipine, a calcium antagonist, was administered intravenously (13.3 micrograms/min) for 45 min, and the changes in blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal blood flow (RBF), total renal resistance, urinary volume, urinary sodium and potassium excretion, plasma renin activity, and plasma aldosterone concentration were studied. GFR and RBF were measured by intravenous infusion of sodium thiosulfate and sodium para-aminohippurate, respectively. The subjects included 12 cases of essential hypertension, nine of chronic glomerular nephritis with hypertension, 14 of chronic glomerular nephritis without hypertension, and 12 normotensive controls. In patients with essential hypertension, GFR and RBF increased markedly (by 45.6% and 44.8%, respectively), but in normotensive and hypertensive patients with chronic glomerular nephritis, these indices did not change significantly. The urinary volume and urinary sodium excretion increased in all groups. The natriuresis induced by nifedipine is probably due to the increase of GFR and RBF. The results of this study suggest a difference in renal vascular pathophysiology between essential hypertension and chronic glomerular nephritis. The results also suggest a functional change of the renal vascular system in essential hypertension, i.e., the increased vascular tone and the particular sensitivity of renal arterioles to nifedipine.     

The effect of oral fenoldopam (SKF 82526-J), a peripheral dopamine receptor agonist, on blood pressure and renal function in normal man.

The effect of a single oral dose of 100 mg of fenoldopam on renal function and blood pressure was investigated in seven healthy male subjects in a double-blind placebo controlled study. Mean diastolic blood pressure fell by 10 mm Hg, 45 min after oral dosing and then gradually returned to baseline values. There was an increase in pulse rate and a delayed rise in systolic blood pressure. Measured from 30 to 120 min after drug ingestion, mean effective renal plasma flow increased to 158% of the value observed after placebo; mean glomerular filtration rate rose to 109% of the placebo value. Measured from 120 to 210 min after administration of the drug, effective renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate had returned to baseline values. Fenoldopam produced a small increase in the mean sodium excretion rate which was not significantly different from the fall after placebo. No change was detected in urine flow or potassium excretion rate. Mean plasma renin activity increased three-fold 1 h after oral dosing. Plasma aldosterone did not show a parallel increase although the plasma concentration at 1 h was significantly higher than after placebo. The results show a pronounced renal vasodilator effect lasting about 2 h. The findings are consistent with marked DA1 receptor agonist activity.     

Renal and adrenal function following acute administration of urapidil in hypertensive patients with normal and impaired renal function

The effects of i.v. injection of urapidil (Ebrantil) (25 mg) on arterial blood pressure, renal function and renin-aldosterone system were studied in a group of patients with hypertension and normal renal function, in patients with hypertension and chronic renal failure and in normotensive controls. The pharmacokinetics of urapidil were evaluated simultaneously by measuring blood levels of the compound and its main metabolite. In the controls and in patients with hypertension, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were lowered few minutes after injection. Minimal blood pressure values were reached after 15-20 min. Hypotensive action was more pronounced in hypertensive patients as compared to controls. In contrast, increment in heart rate was greater in the controls. Despite the fall in blood pressure, renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate remained unchanged. Following the injection of urapidil, plasma renin activity increased with no change in plasma aldosterone levels. Plasma half-life of urapidil averaged 1.96 +/- 0.17 h in controls, 3.31 +/- 0.75 h in patients with hypertension and normal renal function and 2.52 +/- 0.46 h in patients with hypertension and chronic renal failure. Urapidil effectively lowers arterial blood pressure in patients with normal and impaired renal function with no deterioration in renal function.     

Effect of oral penbutolol on renal haemodynamics of hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency

Acute or chronic administration of most beta-adrenoreceptor blocking drugs is associated with a fall in renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate. In patients with renal insufficiency this effect on renal function may be clinically important. Penbutolol is a non-cardioselective, pure laevo, beta-blocker with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Previous studies have suggested that penbutolol may increase the glomerular filtration rate. In this study eight hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency were studied during a three-week placebo period and then for four weeks while taking penbutolol in a dose of 40 or 80 mg daily. Penbutolol produced a fall in the pulse rate in all eight patients. Five of the eight patients had a fall in their supine and standing blood pressure. Effective renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate did not change significantly. In seven of the eight patients there was a fall in the calculated renal vascular resistance but the mean fall did not reach statistical significance. Penbutolol appears to be an effective beta-blocker and one that could be used appropriately in patients with renal insufficiency.     

The renal function and blood pressure effects of dilevalol in the normotensive and hypertensive elderly

Dilevalol, the R-R optical isomer of labetalol, is a nonselective beta adrenergic blocking drug with selective beta-2 agonist properties. In a double-blind, crossover study the renal function effects of dilevalol were compared to placebo in 12 normotensive elderly volunteers before and after single dose administration. In addition, chronic treatment (greater than 4 weeks) effects of dilevalol were determined in eight elderly patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Renal function was determined by plasma disappearance curves from single injections of 99mTc-DTPA and 131I-orthohippurate. In both study populations renal function tests commenced two hours after dosing at expected peak plasma levels of dilevalol. Normotensive volunteers had an acute decrease in glomerular filtration rate of 10.3 ml/min, which was significant (P less than 0.05), while hypertensive patients had no change in glomerular filtration rate. There were no significant changes in other parameters of renal function measured. In the hypertensive elderly dilevalol treatment resulted in significant reductions, 18 and 19 mmHg respectively, of systolic (P less than 0.01) and diastolic (P less than 0.001) blood pressure. Heart rate was reduced by 5 beats per minute, and the change was not statistically significant. Dilevalol appears to be an excellent agent for treatment of hypertension in the elderly hypertensive patient, and does not change renal function when administered chronically to the hypertensive patient. Small but significant decrements in glomerular filtration rate occur with acute administration to normotensive volunteers.     

Effects of converting-enzyme inhibition on cardiorenal hemodynamics in patients with chronic congestive heart failure

The role of the renin-angiotensin system in cardiorenal function in patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure was investigated. A single oral dose of captopril in 16 patients significantly increased cardiac index and reduced arterial blood pressure and total systemic vascular resistance. These changes were significantly greater in subjects with higher baseline plasma renin activity (PRA). During 7-day captopril therapy, renal plasma flow distinctly increased in 10 patients in whom renal function was followed. The increase found in renal plasma flow was greater in subjects with higher PRA. Yet, the reduction in renal vascular resistance was much greater than that of total systemic vascular resistance, even in patients with lower PRA. Simultaneous infusion of aprotinin in eight of these subjects did not affect the captopril-induced increase in renal plasma flow, despite the suppression of plasma bradykinin levels; these responses were the same in both PRA subgroups. The results suggest that captopril reduces total systemic vascular resistance in patients with chronic congestive heart failure through inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system and that the preferential renal vasodilator effect of captopril might be the sole result of this inhibition, with the kallikrein-kinin system or kinin-mediated prostaglandins not playing a major role.     

Acute effects of candesartan cilexetil (the new angiotensin II antagonist) on systemic and renal haemodynamics in hypertensive patients

Objectives: This study was performed to assess the acute effects of the new angiotensin II antagonist, candesartan cilexetil, on systemic and renal haemodynamics in patients with sustained essential hypertension [diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95–114 mmHg]. Methods: After 4 weeks of placebo treatment, systemic and renal haemodynamics were investigated in 17 patients with a mean age of 62 years and a mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 170/98 mmHg, just before (baseline) and for 4 h after administration of a single oral dose of candesartan cilexetil, 16 mg. Plasma concentrations of candesartan (the active compound formed from the pro-drug candesartan cilexetil), angiotensin II (Ang II), as well as plasma renin activity (PRA), were measured before and after dosing. Results: At 2, 3 h and 4 h after dosing with candesartan cilexetil, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and DBP, as well as mean arterial pressure (MAP), were significantly lower than at baseline. The mean reduction in MAP 4 h after dosing was 8.8 mmHg (−6.5%). This effect was due to a fall in total peripheral resistance (TPR), while heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) were virtually unchanged. After 4 h there was a marked reduction in renal vascular resistance (RVR) of 0.0273 mmHg · ml⁻¹ · min (−16%), resulting in an increased renal plasma flow of 64.9 ml · min⁻¹ (14%). The glomerular filtration rate was increased by 7.75 ml · min⁻¹ (8%), and the filtration fraction (FF) was not significantly changed. There was no apparent relationship between the changes observed in systemic and renal haemodynamic variables and plasma concentrations of candesartan. Plasma renin activity increased over the study period, but in general the patients had low PRA. Changes in plasma concentrations of angiotensin II were inconsistent between patients. Conclusion: A single oral tablet of candesartan cilexetil, 16 mg, induced systemic and renal arterial vasodilatation and blood pressure reduction, without compromising renal perfusion or filtration or affecting cardiac performance. Plasma renin activity which was low in general, increased over the study period, but changes in plasma concentrations of angiotensin II were inconsistent. Received: 7 May 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 20 April 1998     

Comparison of the renal effects of dilevalol and carteolol in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension

Summary The effects of 6 weeks of treatment with dilevalol 100 mg once daily, or carteolol 10 mg once daily, on renal blood flow (RBF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and total renal vascular resistance (TRR) were studied in 10 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension in a randomised cross-over experiment.Both drugs lowered the systolic and diastolic blood pressures to a similar extent without altering the heart rate. Carteolol non-significantly decreased RBF by 9.2% and GFR by 12.3% without altering. TRR, whereas dilevalol produced a significant reduction in TRR by 13.2% (p<0.05), a non-significant decrease in RBF by 4.6% and no change in GFR.Neither drug changed plasma osmotic pressure, serum total protein concentration, electrolytes or plasma aldosterone concentration. Plasma renin activity tended to be lower in the dilevalol phase as compared to the carteolol phase.The results suggest that dilevalol may cause a greater decrease in TRR and less reduction in GFR when compared to carteolol in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. The difference in the renal effects might be due to the difference in the potency of vasodilatory properties of both drugs at the doses applied.     

The effects of intravenous L-dopa on plasma renin activity, renal function, and blood pressure in man

Summary L-dopa 7 µg·kg^–1·min^–1 was given intravenously over 2 h to six healthy subjects, controlled by an infusion of saline on a separate occasion, with measurement of plasma renin activity (PRA), urinary sodium and potassium excretion, effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), blood pressure, and pulse rate.Mean PRA fell by 50% following L-dopa, which was significantly different from the slight rise which occurred after saline infusion. There was a significant increase in urinary sodium excretion and effective renal plasma flow on infusion of L-dopa. Mean diastolic blood pressure fell during L-dopa infusion, in contrast to the slight increase which occurred during the control study.These observations confirm the anticipated renal dopaminergic effects of L-dopa and also suggest a dopaminergic influence on renin release in man.