A curious case of foreign body induced jejunal obstruction and perforation

INTRODUCTION

Accidental and unnoticed ingestion of foreign bodies are not very uncommon. Most of such foreign bodies pass through gastrointestinal tract uneventfully and only on rare instances cause obstruction and/or perforation.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We are reporting a case in which a 45 yr old male presented to accident and emergency department of our institute with complaints of pain abdomen, greenish vomiting, abdominal distension, fever and non passage of flatus and stool following alcoholic binge 15 days back. On presentation tachycardia, hypotension, generalised abdominal tenderness and guarding were present. After initial resuscitation and investigation diagnosis of perforation peritonitis was made and emergency exploratory lapratomy was done and a single perforation with plastic foreign body protruding through it was found in jejunum 5 cm distal to duodeno-jejunal junction.

DISCUSSION

The majority of ingested FBs that reach the stomach pass uneventfully through the gastrointestinal tract. The majority of cases occur in children. Only 1% of patient of patients requires surgical intervention depending upon nature, size and shape of the foreign body.

CONCLUSION

Present case report intends to draw the attention towards possibility of intestinal obstruction and perforation by a single plastic foreign body. High index of suspicion is needed as this foreign body is not even radio-opaque and cannot be picked up in X-ray investigations. Also with increasing use of such plastic materials there are increased chances of such incidents.     

Chronic ileitis with transmural migration of ingested foreign body treated by laparoscopy

Background: Ingestion of foreign bodies such as fish bone or chicken bone is relatively common in adults; however, resultant transmural migration is extremely rare.

Methods: We present a case of a 79-year-old woman with chronic low-grade abdominal pain, worsening over the last 4 days. Computed tomography revealed segmental small bowel wall thickening with chronic inflammation suggestive of Crohn’s ileitis and oral steroids were commenced; only later, ingestion of a foreign body was suspected.

Results and conclusion: At diagnostic laparoscopy, a linear foreign body resembling a wooden splinter was identified. It had partly migrated through the chronically inflamed bowel wall without causing perforation or abdominal contamination. It was removed laparoscopically without an enterotomy or bowel resection. Microscopy revealed non-viable bone, likely fish or chicken bone. The patient made an uneventful recovery and was discharged 3 days later. Herein we emphasise on the differential diagnosis and presentation of chronically ingested foreign bodies, as well as the feature of chronic ileitis with uncomplicated transmural migration of the ingested foreign body that was treated laparoscopically without an enterotomy.     

Ingested foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract.

Seven case reports of ingested foreign bodies are presented. Although ingestion of foreign bodies may be a frequent occurrence, 80 per cent of documented ingested foreign bodies pass through the gastrointestinal tract spontaneously. The most frequent victims of foreign body ingestion are children, denture-wearing adults, and the mentally ill. Most foreign bodies are best managed by "intelligent neglect". Some require surgical removal because of perforation hemorrhage or obstruction. The ileocecal region is the most common site for perforation. Close observation for signs of perforation, hemorrhage, and/or obstruction is mandatory.     

Surgical retrieval of a swallowed denture in a schizophrenic patient: a case report

Background

Accidental foreign body ingestion is a common phenomenon in children between 6 months to 6 years of age. In adults, foreign body ingestion is commonly observed in the geriatric population and in patients with psychiatric disorders. Over 80% of ingested foreign bodies pass uneventfully through the intestinal tract. Endoscopic retrieval is needed in about 20% while surgical intervention is indicated in less than 1%. Herein we report an extremely rare case of esophagocutaneous fistula following operative retrival of an impacted denture in the esophagus with spontaneous healing within 3 weeks. A similar case to the best of our knowledge has so far not been reported previously.

Case presentation

A case of accidental ingestion of a dental prosthesis in a 35-year old schizophrenic patient is presented. The patient was referred to our department after accidentally swallowing one of his dental prosthesis. Surgical retrieval was indicated after two unsuccessful endoscopic retrieval attempts. The denture was retrieved following a longitudinal incision of the esophagus via a left cervical approach. The postoperative course was complicated by a clinically suspected esophagocutaneous fistula which was managed conservatively via nothing per os with enteral feeding via a nasogastric tube. Secretion ceased 3 weeks later and a fistula could not be found on contrast enhanced radiographic examination with gastrographin®.

Conclusion

Esophagocutaneous fistula represents a rare but serious complication following foreign body ingestion. An interdisciplinary management including an early surgical consultation should be considered in patients with foreign body impaction in the esophagus following failure of endoscopic retrieval.

     

Cervical spondylodiscitis from an ingested pin: a case report

In the pediatric literature, only 1 case of cervical spondylodiscitis from an ingested foreign body is reported and this was caused by a blunt radiolucent foreign body. The authors now describe a unique case of a 13-year-old teenaged boy who presented with neck pain 6 days after accidental ingestion of a sewing pin. Uncomplicated removal of this pin was followed in 36 days by the development of cervical spondylodiscitis that failed conservative management and required surgical debridement and arthrodesis. Physicians should be aware of the possibility of this complication in any patient that presents with neck pain after foreign body ingestion.     

Laparoscopic removal of an ingested pin migrating into the liver

Most ingested foreign bodies pass through the gastrointestinal tract without giving rise to complications. The possibility of penetration of the intestinal tract, by sharp, pointed objects, however, necessitates careful and continued observation. If such objects become lodged in a narrow segment of the gastrointestinal tract, perforation may occur. The resulting morbidity depends on the further route of the penetrating object and whether septic sequelae ensue. Although foreign bodies may migrate to almost any intraabdominal organ, perforation of the duodenum and migration into the liver are extremely rare. A case of a woman who unknowingly ingested a pin that perforated the duodenum causing only few acute symptoms is presented. Biliary tract pathology was suspected, but ultrasound examination ruled it out. Computed tomography of the abdomen showed a pin thrust into the liver, with the head of the pin in the wall of the duodenum. Traditional surgical treatment requires laparotomy for foreign body removal. In the reported case, the pin was removed laparoscopically. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient left the hospital on day 2 after the procedure. With laparoscopic approach for removal of penetrating intestinal foreign bodies, laparotomy and its attending complications are avoided. This approach is less invasive, has a beneficial impact on postoperative pain, produces a better cosmetic result, and offers a faster return to normal activities. Hospital stay and costs also are reduced.     

Laparoscopic removal of a swallowed toothbrush

Toothbrush swallowing is an uncommon occurrence. Unlike most cases of foreign-body ingestion, there have been no cases of spontaneous passage reported. Consequently, prompt removal is recommended before complications develop. We report a case of toothbrush ingestion which failed attempted endoscopic removal. This patient was managed successfully with laparoscopic assisted removal via gastrotomy. We recommend this approach for the removal of any ingested foreign bodies when surgical intervention is indicated. Received: 20 December 1995/Accepted: 1 March 1996     

Comparison of the clinical presentations of ingested foreign bodies requiring operative and nonoperative management

Foreign body ingestion is commonly seen in emergency departments. Although most cases have a clear history, foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract can be an unexpected finding after operations for other conditions. This study compares the clinical presentations and outcomes for patients requiring or not requiring operations. Between January 1998 and December 2001, 80 patients with foreign body ingestion were included and divided into two groups. Specifically, group 1 patients were managed nonoperatively, and group 2 patients were managed operatively. The patient demographics, symptoms, foreign body ingestion mechanisms, type of diagnostic studies and management, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Group 1 contained 44 patients, and group 2 contained 36 patients. Group 1 patients were significantly younger, but the incidence of underlying disease and the proportion of patients who ingested foreign bodies intentionally or incidentally was similar in groups 1 and 2. Most of the ingested foreign bodies in group 1 were in the esophagus and stomach, but for group 2 patients they were mostly in the small bowel. Moreover, most of group 1 patients were asymptomatic, which was not the case in group 2. Most group 2 patients had no known history of foreign body ingestion, and diagnoses generally were established during surgery. Neither group of patients displayed any mortality. Nonoperative management of foreign body ingestion usually can succeed in asymptomatic patients with a clear history; however, ingested foreign bodies can cause serious problems for those patients without a clear history of foreign body ingestion.     

Conservative management of ingested foreign bodies

We reviewed the clinical benefits of hospitalization, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and surgical intervention for ingested foreign bodies in adults. Patients with esophageal foreign bodies were not included in the study group. A 10-year experience is reported. Each patient’s physical examination findings at presentation, white blood cell count, length of hospital stay, number and types of foreign bodies ingested, endoscopic interventions, surgical interventions, and complications were reviewed. There were 75 separate hospitalizations, all occurring in 22 male prison inmates. A total of 256 foreign bodies were ingested. Patients incurred 281 hospitalization days (average 3.7 days per admission). One patient had signs of peritonitis. White blood cell count was less than 10 K/μL in 85%. Sixty-four endoscopies were performed with removal of 79 of 163 foreign bodies (48% success rate). Five patients required general anesthesia because of a lack of cooperation. Complications occurred in four of them, one requiring laparotomy. Eight additional laparotomies were performed. One was performed for an acute abdomen on admission and one for the development of an acute abdomen after conservative management. Two were performed to remove metal bezoars. Four additional laparotomies were performed because of surgeon preference. Among the 23 patients admitted and managed conservatively, 77 (97%) of 79 foreign bodies passed spontaneously. One patient required laparotomy. Of the 256 ingested foreign bodies, 79 were removed endoscopically, 71 were removed surgically, and 106 passed spontaneously. The size, shape, and number were not predictive of the ability to transit the gastrointestinal tract. Foreign body ingestion is problematic in prison inmates. With conservative management, most foreign bodies will pass spontaneously. Endoscopy has a high failure rate and is associated with significant complications. Surgical intervention should be reserved for those who have acute conditions in the abdomen or large bezoars. Presented at the Forty-Second Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Atlanta, Georgia, May 20–23, 2001 (poster presentation).     

Endoscopic removal of impacted magnetic foreign bodies in the gastroesophageal junction

Ingestion of foreign bodies is common in gastroenterology practice. Most of them are spontaneously passed through gastrointestinal tract. However, ingestion of multiple magnets can cause serious complications, because magnets attract each other and they hold the gastrointestinal wall. Here, we describe a patient who ingested multiple magnets that attracted each other between distal esophagus, and a part of them was impacted into the esophageal wall. In general, impacted magnetic foreign bodies should be removed by surgical intervention because of a high perforation risk. But, in this case, we used an insulated-tip knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection technique to make an incision to expose the impacted magnetic foreign bodies, and removed them successfully without surgery. With this report, we hope to encourage gastroenterologists to consider this new technique as one of procedures for difficult cases, including impacted foreign bodies.     

Gastric perforation secondary to ingestion of a sharp foreign body.

Foreign body ingestions are commonly seen by pediatricians and emergency room personnel. The majority of foreign bodies transit through the gastrointestinal system without any complications. Perforations are uncommon and usually involve peritonitis. We present a case of gastric perforation secondary to ingestion of a sharp metallic pin. Our patient did not demonstrate any of the classic findings described in the literature. His complaints, physical examination, and radiological findings all pointed to acalculous cholecystitis or biliary dyskinesia as the source of pain. Laparoscopy, however, provided the definitive diagnosis. Gastroduodenal perforation secondary to foreign body ingestion should be included in the differential diagnosis of these atypical cases of abdominal pain, especially if such history can be elicited from the patient.     

Lethal Intestinal Perforation After Foreign Body Ingestion in a Superobese Patient

Accidental ingestion of foreign bodies is common in the general population. Most foreign bodies pass through the entire digestive tract without incidents. However, in some cases, the ingested foreign body can cause complications such as acute abdomen due to intestinal perforation and even death. Bowel perforation may not be more common in the massively obese than in the normal-weight population but may be more problematic. We describe a super-obese female (body mass index, 52.3 kg/m²) who underwent emergency surgery for small-bowel perforation caused by an ingested foreign body (fish bone); the patient died despite segmental intestinal resection and intensive care.     

Extra luminal migration of ingested fish bone to the spleen as an unusual cause of splenic rupture: Case report and literature review

IntroductionThe ingestion of foreign bodies (FB) is a common problem worldwide and affects all ages; it is, however, particularly important in the pediatric population and in mentally impaired adults. The typical outcome of FB ingestion is good, since the majority of ingested material is passed spontaneously through the gastrointestinal tract. Serious complications can occur, however, including bowel perforation or obstruction and gastrointestinal bleeding, amongst others. Extraluminal migration of ingested foreign bodies is very rare and reported cases so far have shown, more commonly, migration to neck structures, with very few reported cases of migration to the abdomen. To date, there is no reported case of extraluminal migration of ingested FB to the spleen.Case presentationA 59-year-old man presented with acute abdominal pain and dyspnea. A CT scan revealed a FB within the spleen, with a ruptured capsule and perisplenic collection. Surgery was performed and a 3cm-long fishbone was extracted, with hemoperitoneum secondary to spleen rupture. The patient was discharged on the third postoperative day with good recovery and without any complications; pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination was provided.ConclusionFB ingestion is a relatively benign condition; however, some serious complications can arise infrequently. The patient reported herein is the first in the literature to present a splenic rupture due to extra luminal migration of an ingested fish bone.     

Foreign body induced chronic abscess imitating cancer of the bladder wall

A case of foreign body induced bladder wall abscess erroneously diagnosed as cancer and identified only after surgical removal of the bladder is described. Replacement of the bladder was done by ileo-cystoplasty.Only someone aware of the great variety of case reports concerning foreign bodies in the bladder knows just how many sorts of living and dead matter have been found in the bladder (Boeminghaus) [1].     

复杂食管异物的诊治(附64例报告)

目的总结复杂食管异物的诊治经验. 方法回顾性分析我院1994年1月～2004年7月64例复杂食管异物的临床资料,分析异物种类和停留部位. 结果动物骨类异物占50.0%(32/64),义齿占20.3%(13/64),枣核占14.1%(9/64),其它异物占15.6%(10/64).异物停留在第一、二、三狭窄区分别占68.7%(44/64)、26.6%(17/64)、1.6%(1/64),2例(2/64,3.1%)停留在食管癌术后吻合口上方.与50岁以下患者相比,50岁以上患者义齿类异物及第二狭窄区异物比例增高,分别为30.0%(9/30)与43.3%(13/30),差异有显著性(P<0.05);59例经内镜取出异物治愈,3例颈侧切开治愈,2例转院治疗.食管穿孔6例,4例由食管异物本身造成,2例取异物时手术所致;5例异物取出经保守治愈,1例异物未取出转院治疗. 结论详细询问病史,了解异物种类、停留部位和对周围组织损伤的程度,选择适当麻醉、内镜与操作手法,对安全取出异物以及预防并发症极为重要.     

Perforation of the cecum from ingested foreign body in a 14 year old adolescent with autism spectrum disorder and epilepsy: A case report

Introduction and importanceAlthough foreign body ingestion is a common medical issue, intestinal perforations following foreign body ingestion are rare. Diagnosing foreign body ingestion is challenging especially in children with neurodevelopmental disorders such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). It is believed that approximately 80–90% of ingested foreign bodies pass through the gastrointestinal tract without causing any luminal damage, and only approximately 1% of foreign bodies are known to remain lodged within the bowel and cause luminal erosion and perforation.Case presentationA 14-year-old boy, diagnosed to have Autism Spectrum Disorder was brought in by his parents to our hospital with right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain and fever. On examination, he was tachycardic and there was direct tenderness over the RLQ of the abdomen. Acute appendicitis was entertained and the patient was examined with ultrasound. The ultrasound reported, “The tip of the appendix was dilated (0.62cm) and there is minimal RLQ intra-peritoneal fluid collection”. With the impression of acute appendicitis, the patient was explored and he was found to have a cecum perforation due to an ingested foreign body (twig). Initially we did tube cecostomy but later we did right hemicolectomy because the cecostomy tube had leaked.ConclusionForeign body ingestion should be taken into account during the evaluation of children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders who presented with acute abdominal pain. Since diagnosis is difficult clinicians who are involved in acute care medicine should take a thorough history with a high index of suspicion for foreign body ingestion.     

Unusual gastric foreign body: a case report

Ingestion of foreign bodies, either intentionally or accidentally, is quite common. The authors report an unusual case in which a 32-year-old man deliberately assembled a large metallic aggregate in his stomach by swallowing magnets and coins in order to relieve epigastric discomfort. The collection was retrieved by laparotomy and gastrotomy; a gastric ulcer was also found and it was oversewn. Management of this patient is discussed and the principles of treatment for ingested foreign bodies are reviewed.     

Routine radiographs at time of pin removal after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures do not change management: a retrospective cohort study

Purpose

Radiographs are usually taken on day of pin removal for children treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiographs taken at time of pin removal for patients recovering uneventfully alter management.

Methods

After IRB approval, billing records identified 1213 patients aged 1–10 years who underwent elbow surgery between 2007 and 2013 at our institution for a supracondylar humerus fracture. Of these patients, 389 met inclusion criteria. Clinical charts were reviewed for demographics, operative details, and clinical follow-up, focusing on clinical symptoms present at pin removal. Radiographs taken at time of pin removal and subsequent visits were assessed for healing and fracture alignment.

Results

In no case was pin removal delayed based on radiographs. One hundred and nineteen (31 %) patients had radiographs taken following pin removal; in no case was loss of reduction found among these patients. No cases of neurologic or vascular injury, re-fracture, or loss of reduction occurred. Infection occurred in 12 patients (3 %). Pins were kept in place for 23.8 ± 4.4 days. Eighty-six patients (22 %) had additional intervention after pin removal (cast application in all cases). Of 389 patients, 75 (19 %) had no documented reason for extended casting, four (1 %) were extended based on physician evaluation of radiographs, and seven (2 %) were extended for other reasons.

Conclusions

Elimination of radiographs at time of pin removal should be considered. If continuing to obtain radiographs at pin removal, we recommend removing pins before taking radiographs to reduce patient fear and anxiety from visualizing percutaneous pins.

     

Swallowing a safety pin: Report of a case

Ingestion of a foreign body is a frequent and wellknown medical problem with several diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.Usually,ingested foreign bodies pass through the alimentary tract without incident.In some cases,they can be lodged in the appendix and may cause appendicitis.We report a case of a 29-year old woman,suffering from mental illness,with a safety pin lodged in the appendix.Initially,the patient consulted for abdominal pain.After a period of waiting,during which time the foreign body did not move,a colonoscopy was performed but failed to see the safety pin.Then,the patient underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy.Pathological examination showed an ulcerative appendicitis.     

Small bowel complication caused by magnetic foreign body ingestion of children: two case reports

Accidental ingestion of foreign bodies is a common pediatric problem. The majority of such cases occur between 6 months and 3 years. When several magnets are ingested, they can be attracted to each other through the intestinal wall, causing necrosis and intestinal perforation or fistula, so they should be removed while they are still in the stomach. The authors experienced 2 cases of unusual small bowel complication caused by the ingestion of magnets. The first case was in a 10-month-old boy with ileal perforation caused by to 2 ingested magnetic beads, and the second case was in a 22-month-old boy with ileo-ileal fistula caused by to 7 ingested magnetic beads.