HIV‐Positive‐to‐HIV‐Positive Liver Transplantation

Most countries exclude human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐positive patients from organ donation because of concerns regarding donor‐derived HIV transmission. The Swiss Federal Act on Transplantation has allowed organ transplantation between HIV‐positive donors and recipients since 2007. We report the successful liver transplantation from an HIV‐positive donor to an HIV‐positive recipient. Both donor and recipient had been treated for many years with antiretroviral therapy and harbored multidrug‐resistant viruses. Five months after transplantation, HIV viremia remains undetectable. This observation supports the inclusion of appropriate HIV‐positive donors for transplants specifically allocated to HIV‐positive recipients.     

Donor‐Derived Strongyloides stercoralis Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients in the United States, 2009–2013

Infection with Strongyloides stercoralis is typically asymptomatic in immunocompetent hosts, despite chronic infection. In contrast, immunocompromised hosts such as solid organ transplant recipients are at risk for hyperinfection syndrome and/or disseminated disease, frequently resulting in fatal outcomes. Infection in these recipients may result from reactivation of latent infection or infection through transmission from an infected donor. We describe the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's experience with seven clusters of donor‐derived infection from 2009 to 2013. Six of the seven (86%) donors were born in Latin America; donor screening was not performed prior to organ transplantation in any of these investigations. Eleven of the 20 (55%) organ recipients were symptomatic, two of whom died from complications of strongyloidiasis. We also describe the New York Organ Donor Network (NYODN) experience with targeted donor screening from 2010 to 2013. Of the 233 consented potential donors tested, 10 tested positive for Strongyloides antibody; and 18 organs were transplanted. The majority (86%) of the donors were born in Central or South America. Fourteen recipients received prophylaxis after transplantation; no recipients developed strongyloidiasis. The NYODN experience provides evidence that when targeted donor screening is performed prior to transplantation, donor‐derived infection can be averted in recipients.     

Transplantation of high‐risk donor organs: a survey of US solid organ transplant center practices as reported by transplant infectious diseases physicians

Abstract: Public Health Service (PHS) guidelines developed in 1994 provide guidance to minimize the risk of HIV transmission and to monitor recipients following the transplantation of “high‐risk” organs. There are no data on current practices or opinions of these policies by transplant infectious diseases (TID) physicians. An electronic survey was sent to all US solid organ transplatation centers with identified TID expertise as self‐reported to the American Society of Transplantation and Infectious Diseases Society of America. A total of 108 surveys were sent in December 2007 and 32 responses were received (30%). Thirty‐three percent of centers obtain only verbal, 52% verbal and written, and 14% do not obtain any special consent from recipients of organs from high‐risk donors (ROHRD). Post‐solid organ transplantation serologies for HIV, hepatitis B (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are obtained at 40% of centers in ROHRD only, 20% in all recipients, and not performed in 40%; post‐solid organ transplantation nucleic acid testing (NAT) testing is carried out in 36–45% of centers in ROHRD, 11% in all recipients, and not performed in approximately 50% of centers. Only 22.7% of respondents believed current guidelines accurately represent what they consider to be high‐risk donors. There is significant variability in the acceptance and management of ROHRD in the US. Most TID experts do not feel that the current PHS guidelines accurately define high‐risk donors.     

Hepatitis B and C virus infections transmitted through organ transplantation investigated by CDC,United States, 2014‐2017

We evaluated clinical outcomes among organ recipients with donor‐derived hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections investigated by CDC from 2014 to 2017 in the United States. We characterized new HBV infections in organ recipients if donors tested negative for total anti‐HBc, HBsAg and HBV DNA, and new recipient HCV infections if donors tested negative for anti‐HCV and HCV RNA. Donor risk behaviors were abstracted from next‐of‐kin interviews and medical records. During 2014‐2017, seven new recipient HBV infections associated with seven donors were identified; six (86%) recipients survived. At last follow‐up, all survivors had functioning grafts and five (83%) had started antiviral therapy. Twenty new recipient HCV infections associated with nine donors were identified; 19 (95%) recipients survived. At last follow‐up, 18 (95%) survivors had functioning grafts and 14 (74%) had started antiviral treatment. Combining donor next‐of kin interviews and medical records, 11/16 (69%) donors had evidence of injection drug use and all met Public Health Service increased risk donor (IRD) criteria. IRD designation led to early diagnosis of recipient infection, and prompt implementation of therapy, likely reducing the risk of graft failure, liver disease, and death.     

公民身后器官捐献肝移植术后早期细菌和真菌感染并发症的临床特点与危险因素分析

目的对比分析公民身后器官捐献与传统司法途径器官捐献肝移植术后早期受体细菌和真菌感染并发症的临床特点,探讨公民身后器官捐献肝移植受体术后感染的危险因素。 方法回顾性研究2011年1月至2013年12月间本中心实施的公民身后器官捐献肝脏供、受体（研究组）和司法途径来源器官捐献的肝移植受体病例（对照组）,比较两组受体术后细菌、真菌感染的临床特点和预后,分析术后受体感染的危险因素。 结果共纳入公民身后器官捐献肝脏供体43例;研究组受体72例,对照组受体80例。研究组受体的细菌、真菌感染总发生率显著高于对照组（47.2% vs 31.2%）（χ²=4.071,P=0.044）。研究组受体术后1周内的细菌感染率高于对照组（64.5% vs 38.2%）（χ²=6.133,P=0.018）。供体捐献前感染和开放性创伤史是术后受体感染的独立危险因素（P=0.025、0.031）。4例疑似供体来源性受体感染,占研究组总感染例数的11.8%（4/34）。 结论使用公民身后器官捐献来源器官的肝移植术后受体感染发生率显著高于传统司法途径来源,发生细菌感染的时间更早。供体器官捐献前存在感染和有开放性创伤是肝移植术后受体发生感染的危险因素。     

Coccidioidomycosis Transmission Through Organ Transplantation: A Report of the OPTN Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee

Donor‐derived coccidioidomycosis has caused unexpected morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. All proven or probable reports of donor‐derived coccidioidomycosis to the Disease Transmission Advisory Committee between 2005 and August 2012 were reviewed. Six reports of proven or probable coccidioidomycosis were discovered. In four of six, the infection was first detected at autopsy in the recipient. In two cases it was first identified in the donor. Twenty‐one recipients received organs from these six donors. Transmission occurred in 43% at a median of 30 days posttransplant with a mortality rate of 28.5%. Eleven recipients received preemptive antifungals, seven did not receive treatment, and treatment information was not reported for three recipients. Five of seven who did not receive prophylaxis/treatment died and all 11 who received early therapy survived. Six deaths occurred 14 to 55 days after transplant, with a median of 21 days. For exposed recipients, donor‐derived coccidioidomycosis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Evidence of infection in one recipient should prompt immediate evaluation for treatment of all other recipients from the same donor as preemptive treatment was effective. Further studies are needed to decide whether all donors from endemic areas should have routine serologic screening.     

Donor‐derived Kaposi's sarcoma in a liver–kidney transplant recipient

Human herpes virus 8 (HHV‐8), also known as Kaposi's sarcoma associated herpesvirus (KSHV), is an oncogenic virus that can cause Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). KS can develop following organ transplantation through reactivation of the recipient's latent HHV‐8 infection, or less commonly through donor‐derived infection which has higher risk for severe illness and mortality. We describe a case of probable donor‐derived KS in the recipient of a liver–kidney transplant. The donor had multiple risk factors for HHV‐8 infection. The KS was successfully treated by switching immunosuppression from tacrolimus to sirolimus. With an increasing number of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐positive persons seeking organ transplantation and serving as organ donors for HIV‐positive recipients, HHV‐8 prevalence among donors and recipients will likely increase and with that the risk for post‐transplant KS. Predetermination of HHV‐8 status can be useful when considering organ donors and recipients with risk factors, although there are currently no validated commercial tests for HHV‐8 antibody screening.     

Risk factors for multidrug‐resistant organisms among deceased organ donors

Donor infection or colonization with a multidrug‐resistant organism (MDRO) affects organ utilization and recipient antibiotic management. Approaches to identifying donors at risk of carrying MDROs are unknown. We sought to determine the risk factors for MDROs among transplant donors. A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at four transplant centers between 2015 and 2016. All deceased donors who donated at least one organ were included. Cultures obtained during the donor's terminal hospitalization and organ procurement were evaluated. The primary outcome was isolation of an MDRO on culture. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine risk factors associated with time to donor MDRO. Of 440 total donors, 64 (15%) donors grew an MDRO on culture. Predictors of an MDRO on donor culture included hepatitis C viremia (hazard ratio [HR] 4.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71‐9.78, P = .002), need for dialysis (HR 4.59, 95% CI 1.09‐19.21, P = .037), prior hematopoietic cell transplant (HR 7.57, 95% CI 1.03‐55.75, P = .047), and exposure to antibiotics with a narrow gram‐negative spectrum (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00‐1.27, P = .045). This is the first study to determine risk factors for MDROs among deceased donors and will be important for risk stratifying potential donors and informing transplant recipient prophylaxis.     

Organ transplantation from “increased infectious risk donors”: the experience of the Nord Italia Transplant program — A retrospective study

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and the clinical outcome associated with organ transplantation from increased infectious risk donors (IRD). We retrospectively identified all adult deceased IRD referred to the Nord Italia Transplant program coordinating center from November 2006 to November 2011. All potential donors were screened for social risk factors that may increase the risk of donor‐derived infection with human immunodeficiency (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C virus (HCV). All recipients were followed monthly for the first 6 months post‐transplant. A total of 86 potential IRD were identified during the study period. Three hundred and seventy‐nine organs from IRD were offered to the transplant centers, but only 185 (48.8%) were used for transplantation. Organs from IRD were transplanted into 174 recipients. The complete follow‐up data were available for 152 of 174 (87.3%) recipients. During a mean follow‐up of 11.7 months (median 12; range 2.4–12), no transmission of HIV, HBV, or syphilis was documented by serology and nucleic acid testing (NAT) testing. Two patients transplanted with organs from HCV‐RNA‐positive donors, as expected, developed post‐transplant HCV infection. In conclusion, the use of organs from IRD was associated with a safe increase in the transplant procedures in our country.     

Strategies to halt 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2) spread for organ transplantation programs at the Sichuan Academy of Medical Science and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital,China

During the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2) outbreak in China (from January 24 to March 11, 2020), our center performed 16 organ transplants (10 kidney, 4 liver, and 2 lung transplants) harvested from deceased donors. Regarding the strategies to prevent infections of SARS‐CoV‐2, we implemented specific measures for the donor and recipient management, as well as prevention of hospital‐acquired infections. All 16 organ recipients had a favorable outcome without SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Our approaches aiming to interrupt the spread of SARS‐CoV‐2 within the transplantation wards were successful, and allowed us to maintain the transplantation program for deceased liver, kidney, and lung organ recipients.     

Impact of deceased donor multidrug‐resistant bacterial organisms on organ utilization

The extent to which donor multidrug‐resistant organisms (MDROs) affect organ utilization remains unclear. We performed a retrospective cohort study at 4 transplant centers between 2015 and 2016 to evaluate this question. All deceased donors who donated at least one organ were included. Exposed donors had at least one MDRO on culture. Unexposed donors had no MDRO‐positive cultures. Only cultures obtained during the donor's terminal hospitalization were evaluated. Multivariable regression was used to determine the association between donor MDRO and (1) number of organs transplanted per donor and (2) the match run at which each organ was accepted. Subsequently, we restricted the analysis to donors with MDR‐Gram‐negative (GN) organisms. Of 440 total donors, 29 (7%) donors grew MDROs and 7 (2%) grew MDR‐GNs. There was no significant association between donor MDRO and either measure of organ utilization. However, donor MDR‐GNs were associated with a significant reduction in the number of organs transplanted per donor (incidence rate ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39‐0.48, P < .01), and organs were accepted significantly further down the match list (relative count 5.08, 95% CI 1.64‐15.68, P = .01). Though donor MDR‐GNs were infrequent in our study, their growing prevalence could meaningfully reduce the donor pool over time.     

Cryptococcus transmission through solid organ transplantation in the United States: A report from the Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee

Cryptococcus species can cause serious life-threatening infection in solid organ transplant recipients by reactivation of prior infection, posttransplant de novo infection, or donor transmission from the transplanted organ. Although previously reported in the literature, the extent of donor-derived cryptococcosis in the United States has not been documented. We analyzed potential donor-derived Cryptococcus transmission events reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) for investigation by the Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC). All reports between 2009 and 2019 in which transmission to recipients was designated proven or probable, or determined to be averted due to implementation of prophylaxis (intervention without disease transmission—“IWDT”) were included. During 2009–2019, 58 reports of potential donor-derived cryptococcosis were submitted to DTAC. Among these reports, 12 donors were determined to have resulted in proven or probable transmission to 23/34 (67.6%) recipients. Most of these donors (10/12 [83%]) exhibited central nervous system-related symptoms prior to death and 5/23 (22%) infected recipients died. For 11 different donors, prophylaxis, most often with fluconazole, was administered to 23/35 (65.7%) recipients. Clinicians should maintain awareness of donor-derived cryptococcosis and consider prompt prophylaxis or treatment followed by reporting to OPTN for further investigation.     

Utilization of deceased donors during a pandemic: argument against using SARS‐CoV‐2–positive donors

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) has rapidly become an unprecedented pandemic that has impacted society, disrupted hospital functions, strained health care resources, and impacted the lives of transplant professionals. Despite this, organ failure and the need for transplant continues throughout the United States. Considering the perpetual scarcity of deceased donor organs, Kates et al present a viewpoint that advocates for the utilization of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)–positive donors in selected cases. We present a review of the current literature that details the potential negative consequences of COVID‐19–positive donors. The factors we consider include (1) the risk of blood transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2, (2) involvement of donor organs, (3) lack of effective therapies, (4) exposure of health care and recovery teams, (5) disease transmission and propagation, and (6) hospital resource utilization. While we acknowledge that transplant fulfills the mission of saving lives, it is imperative to consider the consequences not only to our recipients but also to the community and to health care workers, particularly in the absence of effective preventative or curative therapies. For these reasons, we believe the evidence and risks show that COVID‐19 infection should continue to remain a contraindication for donation, as has been the initial response of donation and transplant societies.     

Organs from deceased donors with false‐positive HIV screening tests: An unexpected benefit of the HOPE act

Organs from deceased donors with suspected false‐positive HIV screening tests were generally discarded due to the chance that the test was truly positive. However, the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act now facilitates use of such organs for transplantation to HIV‐infected (HIV+) individuals. In the HOPE in Action trial, donors without a known HIV infection who unexpectedly tested positive for anti‐HIV antibody (Ab) or HIV nucleic acid test (NAT) were classified as suspected false‐positive donors. Between March 2016 and March 2018, 10 suspected false‐positive donors had organs recovered for transplant for 21 HIV + recipients (14 single‐kidney, 1 double‐kidney, 5 liver, 1 simultaneous liver‐kidney). Median donor age was 24 years; cause of death was trauma (n = 5), stroke (n = 4), and anoxia (n = 1); three donors were labeled Public Health Service increased infectious risk. Median kidney donor profile index was 30.5 (IQR 22‐58). Eight donors were HIV Ab+/NAT‐; two were HIV Ab‐/NAT+. All 10 suspected false‐positive donors were confirmed to be HIV‐noninfected. Given the false‐positive rates of approved assays used to screen > 20 000 deceased donors annually, we estimate 50‐100 HIV false‐positive donors per year. Organ transplantation from suspected HIV false‐positive donors is an unexpected benefit of the HOPE Act that provides another novel organ source.     

Donor-derived human herpesvirus 8 and development of Kaposi sarcoma among 6 recipients of organs from donors with high-risk sexual and substance use behavior

Kaposi sarcoma (KS) can develop following organ transplantation through reactivation of recipient human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) infection or through donor-derived HHV-8 transmission. We describe 6 cases of donor-derived HHV-8 infection and KS investigated from July 2018 to January 2020. Organs from 6 donors, retrospectively identified as HHV-8-positive, with a history of drug use disorder, were transplanted into 22 recipients. Four of 6 donors had risk factors for HHV-8 infection reported in donor history questionnaires. Fourteen of 22 organ recipients (64%) had evidence of posttransplant HHV-8 infection. Lung recipients were particularly susceptible to KS. Four of the 6 recipients who developed KS died from KS or associated complications. The US opioid crisis has resulted in an increasing number and proportion of organ donors with substance use disorder, and particularly injection drug use history, which may increase the risk of HHV-8 transmission to recipients. Better awareness of the risk of posttransplant KS for recipients of organs from donors with HHV-8 infection risk could be useful for recipient management. Testing donors and recipients for HHV-8 is currently challenging with no validated commercial serology kits available. Limited HHV-8 antibody testing is available through some US reference laboratories and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.     

Donor‐Derived Bacteremia in Liver Transplant Recipients Despite Antibiotic Prophylaxis

As the disparity between the number of candidates listed for transplant and the number of donors continues to grow, marginal organ donors are increasingly utilized. This includes bacteremic donors which may carry an increased risk of transmission of infection. It is recommended that recipients of organs from bacteremic donors receive antibiotic prophylaxis based on the susceptibilities of the donor isolate to prevent transmission. Here, we present four cases of donor‐derived bacteremia, despite appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis, in four liver transplant recipients. Transmitted pathogens included Staphylococcus aureus in two cases, and Escherichia coli and Group B Streptococcus each in one case. Interestingly, none of the nonhepatic organs (n = 10) utilized from these bacteremic donors resulted in transmissions. These cases highlight the fact that risk of transmission from bacteremic donors is not eliminated with antimicrobial therapy in the donor and recipient. As no transmissions occurred in recipients of nonhepatic organs from these donors, these cases also suggest that liver recipients may be at higher risk of donor transmitted bacteremia.     

Immediate administration of antiviral therapy after transplantation of hepatitis C‐infected livers into uninfected recipients: Implications for therapeutic planning

The practice of transplanting hepatitis C (HCV)‐infected livers into HCV‐uninfected recipients has not previously been recommended in transplant guidelines, in part because of concerns over uncontrolled HCV infection of the allograft. Direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) provide an opportunity to treat donor‐derived HCV‐infection and should be administered early in the posttransplant period. However, evidence on the safety and efficacy of an immediate DAA treatment approach, including how to manage logistical barriers surrounding timely DAA procurement, are required prior to broader use of HCV‐positive donor organs. We report the results of a trial in which 14 HCV‐negative patients underwent successful liver transplantation from HCV‐positive donors. Nine patients received viremic (nucleic acid testing [NAT]‐positive) livers and started a 12‐week course of oral glecaprevir‐pibrentasvir within 5 days of transplant. Five patients received livers from HCV antibody‐positive nonviremic donors and were followed using a reactive approach. Survival in NAT‐positive recipients is 100% at a median follow‐up of 46 weeks. An immediate treatment approach for HCV NAT‐positive liver transplantation into uninfected recipients is safe and efficacious. Securing payer approval for DAAs early in the posttransplant course could enable need‐based allocation of HCV‐positive donor organs irrespective of candidate HCV status, while averting chronic HCV allograft infection.     

Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) of Organ Donors: Is the ‘Best’ Test the Right Test? A Consensus Conference Report

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) for HIV, HBV and HCV shortens the time between infection and detection by available testing. A group of experts was selected to develop recommendations for the use of NAT in the HIV/HBV/HCV screening of potential organ donors. The rapid turnaround times needed for donor testing and the risk of death while awaiting transplantation make organ donor screening different from screening blood‐or tissue donors. In donors with no identified risk factors, there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine NAT, as the benefits of NAT may not outweigh the disadvantages of NAT especially when false‐positive results can lead to loss of donor organs. For donors with identified behavioral risk factors, NAT should be considered to reduce the risk of transmission and increase organ utilization. Informed consent balancing the risks of donor‐derived infection against the risk of remaining on the waiting list should be obtained at the time of candidate listing and again at the time of organ offer. In conclusion, there is insufficient evidence to recommend universal prospective screening of organ donors for HIV, HCV and HBV using current NAT platforms. Further study of viral screening modalities may reduce disease transmission risk without excessive donor loss.     

Transplanting hepatitis C virus–infected hearts into uninfected recipients: A single‐arm trial

The advent of direct‐acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has generated tremendous interest in transplanting organs from HCV‐infected donors. We conducted a single‐arm trial of orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) from HCV‐infected donors into uninfected recipients, followed by elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment after recipient HCV was first detected (NCT03146741; sponsor: Merck). We enrolled OHT candidates aged 40‐65 years; left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and liver disease were exclusions. We accepted hearts from HCV‐genotype 1 donors. From May 16, 2017 to May 10, 2018, 20 patients consented for screening and enrolled, and 10 (median age 52.5 years; 80% male) underwent OHT. The median wait from UNOS opt‐in for HCV nucleic‐acid‐test (NAT)+ donor offers to OHT was 39 days (interquartile range [IQR] 17‐57). The median donor age was 34 years (IQR 31‐37). Initial recipient HCV RNA levels ranged from 25 IU/mL to 40 million IU/mL, but all 10 patients had rapid decline in HCV NAT after elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment. Nine recipients achieved sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR‐12). The 10th recipient had a positive cross‐match, experienced antibody‐mediated rejection and multi‐organ failure, and died on day 79. No serious adverse events occurred from HCV transmission or treatment. These short‐term results suggest that HCV‐negative candidates transplanted with HCV‐infected hearts have acceptable outcomes.     

Liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV) non‐viremic recipients with HCV viremic donors

In the context of organ shortage, the opioid epidemic, and effective direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV), more HCV‐infected donor organs may be used for liver transplantation. Current data regarding outcomes after donor‐derived HCV in previously non‐viremic liver transplant recipients are limited. Clinical data for adult liver transplant recipients with donor‐derived HCV infection from March 2017 to January 2018 at our institution were extracted from the medical record. Ten patients received livers from donors known to be infected with HCV based on positive nucleic acid testing. Seven had a prior diagnosis of HCV and were treated before liver transplantation. All recipients were non‐viremic at the time of transplantation. All 10 recipients derived hepatitis C infection from their donor and achieved sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment with DAA‐based regimens, with a median time from transplant to treatment initiation of 43 days (IQR 20–59). There have been no instances of graft loss or death, with median follow‐up of 380 days (IQR 263–434) posttransplant. Transplantation of HCV‐viremic livers into non‐viremic recipients results in acceptable short‐term outcomes. Such strategies may be used to expand the donor pool and increase access to liver transplantation.