Direct‐acting antivirals and hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in co‐infected HBV/HCV kidney‐transplant recipients

Direct‐acting agents (DAAs) are highly efficient at treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections after kidney transplantation. Although drug agencies have recently warned of the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after patients have received DAAs, reports have discrepant results in HBsAg‐positive and HBsAg‐negative patients. We report on 3 cases of HBV reactivation that were detected after achieving a DAA‐associated sustained virological response in 3 kidney‐transplant recipients initially HBsAg‐negative. In the first case, retrospective virological analysis revealed that HBsAgs had become positive and HBV DNA was detectable before initiating DAA therapy. In the second and third cases, HBV reactivation occurred 2 months and more than 1 year after stopping anti‐HCV therapy. These cases underline the discrepancies and highlight the need for comprehensive information before making definitive conclusions regarding the causal link between DAAs and HBV reactivation.     

Factors associated with isolated anti‐hepatitis B core antibody in HIV‐positive patients: impact of compromised immunity

Summary. In regions that are hyperendemic for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, prevalence of and risk factors associated with isolated anti‐hepatitis B core antibody (anti‐HBc) in HIV‐positive patients are less well described. HIV‐positive patients who were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti‐hepatitis B surface antibody (anti‐HBs) and anti‐HBc at designated hospitals for HIV care in Taiwan were included for analysis. HBV DNA was detected by real‐time polymerase chain reaction in patients with and without isolated anti‐HBc. Of 2351 HIV‐positive patients, 450 (19.1%) were HBsAg positive, 411 (17.5%) were anti‐HBc positive alone and 963 (41.0%) for both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc. Compared with patients who were positive for both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc, patients with isolated anti‐HBc were older, less likely to have anti‐hepatitis C virus antibody (anti‐HCV), had lower CD4 lymphocyte counts and higher plasma HIV RNA loads. Older age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.029; 95% confidence interval, 1.015–1.043) and CD4 <100 cells/μL (adjusted odds ratio, 1.524; 95% confidence interval, 1.025–2.265) were independently associated with isolated anti‐HBc by logistic regression, while presence of anti‐HCV and injecting drug use were not. HBV DNA was detectable in 8.3% of 277 patients with isolated anti‐HBc and 14.3% of 56 patients with both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc (P = 0.160). In a country hyperendemic for HBV infection, HIV‐positive patients at older age and with CD4 <100 cells/μL were more likely to have isolated anti‐HBc, suggesting that compromised immunity plays a role in the presence of this marker.     

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus during interferon‐free therapy with daclatasvir and asunaprevir in patient with hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus co‐infection

Direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) are not effective for hepatitis B virus (HBV), which may be suggestive of reactivation of anti‐HBe hepatitis during interferon (IFN)‐free DAA therapy in HBV/HCV co‐infected patients with inactive HBV. A 69‐year‐old male patient was diagnosed with chronic hepatitis due to HBV/HCV co‐infection with serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of 94 U/L, HCV RNA of 4.2 log IU/mL and HBV DNA of 2.5 log copies/mL. HCV was thought to be responsible for the hepatitis activity because of low level of HBV core‐related antigen (3.1 log U/mL). He was treated with combination therapy of daclatasvir and asunaprevir. Serum ALT gradually increased, and reached 237 U/L on day 43 in spite of undetectable HCV RNA. Serum HBV DNA was increasing to 7.0 log copies/mL at that time. The treatment was stopped due to suspicion of drug‐induced liver injury and/or HBV reactivation. Administration of entecavir reduced HBV DNA levels, followed by improvement in ALT levels. This report proposes that close monitoring of HBV DNA during the anti‐HCV DAA therapy and the commencement of anti‐HBV therapy with nucleoside analogs after the increase of HBV DNA should be considered in patients with HBV/HCV co‐infection.     

High levels of circulating N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide in patients with hepatitis C

Summary. Many patients chronically infected by hepatitis C virus (HCV) experience symptoms like fatigue, dyspnea and reduced physical activity. However, in many patients, these symptoms are not proportional to the liver involvement and could resemble symptoms of chronic heart failure. To our knowledge, no study evaluated serum levels of N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) in a large series of patients with HCV chronic infection (HCV+). Serum NT‐proBNP was assayed in 50 patients HCV+ and in 50 sex‐ and age‐matched controls. HCV+ patients showed significantly higher mean NT‐proBNP level than controls (P = 0.001). By defining high NT‐proBNP level as a value higher than 125 pg/mL (the single cut‐off point for patient under 75 years of age), 34% HCV+ and 6% controls had high NT‐proBNP (Fisher exact test; P < 0.001). With a cut‐off point of 300 pg/mL (used to rule out chronic heart failure in patients under 75 years of age) 10% HCV+ and 0 controls had high NT‐proBNP (Fisher exact test; P = 0.056). With a cut‐off point of 900 pg/mL (used for ruling in chronic heart failure in patients with age 50–75) 8% HCV+ patients and 0 controls had high NT‐proBNP (Fisher exact test; P = 0.12). The study demonstrates high levels of circulating NT‐proBNP in HCV+ patients compared to healthy controls. The increase of NT‐proBNP may indicate the presence of a sub‐clinical cardiac dysfunction. Further prospective studies quantifying these symptoms in correlation with echocardiography are needed to confirm this association.     

Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection in non‐Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Background and aim: A recent meta‐analysis has demonstrated an association between hepatitis C virus and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). There is also evidence on the association between hepatitis B virus (HBV) and NHL. The aim of this study was to evaluate this evidence using a meta‐analytic approach. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE database from 1962 to 2008 for case–control studies that have reported the association of HBV with NHL. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to assess the prevalence of HBV infection and pooled the results using three different statistical models. Results: Our search yielded 12 studies with 11 studies (3262 NHL patients, 1 523 205 controls) evaluating HBV infection in NHL and one study (3888 HBV‐infected individuals, 205 203 controls) that had investigated for NHL in HBV infection. The OR of detecting HBV infection in NHL when compared with the control population was 2.56 (95% CI, 2.24–2.92) by the fixed effects model; 2.61 (95% CI, 2.29–2.98) by the exact method and 2.67 (95% CI, 2.04–3.49) by the random effects model suggesting a high prevalence of HBV carrier state in lymphoma. There was evidence of statistical heterogeneity which disappeared after exclusion of retrospective studies on sensitivity analysis. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest a possible causal relation between HBV infection and NHL which needs to be confirmed by experimental and epidemiological studies. In countries where prevalence of HBV infection is 1% or more, it may be prudent to screen patients with NHL for occult HBV infection.     

Cross‐genotype‐specific T‐cell responses in acute hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection

Hepatitis E is an inflammatory liver disease caused by infection with the hepatitis E virus (HEV). In tropical regions, HEV is highly endemic and predominantly mediated by HEV genotypes 1 and 2 with >3 million symptomatic cases per year and around 70 000 deaths. In Europe and America, the zoonotic HEV genotypes 3 and 4 have been reported with continues increasing new infections per year. So far, little is known about T‐cell responses during acute HEV genotype 3 infection. Therefore, we did a comprehensive study investigating HEV‐specific T‐cell responses using genotypes 3‐ and 1‐specific overlapping peptides. Additional cytokines and chemokines were measured in the plasma. In four patients, longitudinal studies were performed. Broad functional HEV‐specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T‐cell responses were detectable in patients acutely infected with HEV genotype 3. Elevated of pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory cytokine levels during acute HEV infection correlated with ALT levels. Memory HEV‐specific T‐cell responses were detectable up to >1.5 years upon infection. Importantly, cross‐genotype HEV‐specific T‐cell responses (between genotypes 1 and 3) were measurable in all investigated patients. In conclusion, we could show for the first time HEV‐specific T‐cell responses during and after acute HEV genotype 3 infection. Our data of cross‐genotype HEV‐specific T‐cell responses might suggest a potential role in cross‐genotype‐specific protection between HEV genotypes 1 and 3.     

Effect of hepatitis B virus on steatosis in hepatitis C virus co‐infected subjects: A multi‐centre study and systematic review

It remains unclear whether hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection may modify the severity of viral steatosis in patients coinfected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). We examined the influence of coinfection with HBV on prevalence of steatosis in chronic hepatitis C in a multi‐centre cohort of HBV‐HCV subjects, and by performing a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the literature. We centrally and blindly assessed steatosis prevalence and severity in a cohort of HBV‐HCV coinfected subjects compared to HCV and HBV monoinfected controls and we performed a systematic review of studies addressing the prevalence of steatosis in HBV‐HCV subjects compared to HCV controls. In the clinical cohort, we included 85 HBV‐HCV, 69 HBV and 112 HCV subjects from 16 international centres. There was no significant difference in steatosis prevalence between the HBV‐HCV and the HCV groups (33% vs 45%, P = .11). In subgroup analysis, lean HBV‐HCV subjects with detectable HBV DNA had less steatosis than lean HCV subjects matched for HCV viremia (15% vs 45%, P = .02). Our literature search identified 5 additional studies included in a systematic review. Overall, prevalence of steatosis > 5% was similar in HBV‐HCV infection compared to HCV (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.53‐1.6) although there was significant heterogeneity (I² 69%, P = .007). In conclusion, although the prevalence of steatosis is similar in HBV‐HCV compared to HCV subjects, our analysis suggests that there may be an inhibitory effect of HCV‐induced steatogenesis by HBV in certain subgroups of patients.     

Serum miR‐122 may serve as a biomarker for response to direct acting antivirals: effect of paritaprevir/R with dasabuvir or ombitasvir on miR‐122 in HCV‐infected subjects

Circulating microRNAs (miRNA) have been intensely investigated as biomarkers in disease and therapy. Several studies have identified miR‐122 as an important regulator of HCV replication. The effect of new therapies that directly target the HCV replication life cycle on circulating microRNA levels has not been elucidated. We performed expression profiling of circulating miRNA in serum in subjects treated with HCV direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Serum miRNA levels were evaluated from two studies in HCV GT1‐infected treatment‐naïve subjects and prior nonresponders to pegylated interferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV) who received paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir + RBV for 12 weeks, and in treatment‐naïve genotype (GT)1‐3‐infected subjects who received paritaprevir/ritonavir + ombitasvir ± RBV for 12 weeks. Over 100 different miRNA species were detected in serum. Of these, levels of miR‐122 showed the most consistent change in response to treatment across all HCV genotypes. In all subjects, miR‐122 showed an average four‐fold reduction between baseline and week 2, and remained below baseline through post‐treatment week 12 in subjects who achieved sustained virological response. In contrast, in subjects who did not achieve SVR, miR‐122 levels began to return to baseline levels after the second week of treatment. The change in miR‐122 levels was similar across genotypes, and was comparable with or without RBV. This is the first report comparing expression levels of circulating miRNA in HCV GT1‐3 subjects treated with IFN‐free combinations of DAAs. The results suggest that serum levels of miR‐122 are reduced following treatment in subjects who achieve SVR, and correlate with HCV RNA levels across genotypes.     

Hepatitis B virus and risk of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma: An updated meta‐analysis of 58 studies

Previous studies have focused on the relationship between hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, the results remain inconsistent and somehow conflicting in different subgroups. The aim of this study was to combine the findings of independent studies to comprehensively assess the association between HBV and NHL using a meta‐analysis. Relevant studies were identified through structured keyword searches in PubMed, EMBASE and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, and 58 studies with a total of 53 714 NHL cases and 1 778 591 controls were finally included. Pooled estimates indicated a significantly increased NHL risk in HBV‐infected individuals (summary odds ratio [sOR]: 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.20‐2.83) regardless of the study design (case–control studies: sOR: 2.47; 95% CI: 2.16‐2.82; cohort studies: sOR: 2.64; 95% CI: 1.78‐3.91). Considerable heterogeneity was observed across studies that was primarily attributed to the NHL subtypes (meta‐regression: P < .05). Overall, B‐cell NHL (sOR: 2.46; 95% CI: 1.97‐3.07) presented a stronger association with HBV infection than T‐cell NHL (sOR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.34‐2.10). Within the B‐cell NHL subtypes, HBV infection was significantly associated with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL, sOR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.48‐2.88) and follicular lymphoma (FL, sOR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.11‐2.12), but not with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and Burkitt lymphoma. The results of this meta‐analysis support a positive link between HBV infection and NHL development. Further investigations for the mechanisms underlying HBV‐induced NHL are warranted.     

Pan‐genotypic treatment regimens for hepatitis C virus: Advantages and disadvantages in high‐ and low‐income regions

During the last 5 years, the availability of direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) agents has revolutionized the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Compared with interferon/ribavirin—the previous standard of care—DAA combination regimens offer improved sustained virological response (SVR) rates, shorter treatment durations of 8‐24 weeks, convenient once‐daily single‐tablet formulations and more favourable tolerability profiles. HCV treatment is complex, and the choice of therapy must consider a complex range of factors, including baseline viral load, fibrosis stage, the HCV genotype and subgenotype, and the presence of resistance‐associated substitutions at baseline. Globally, HCV genotype 1 predominates, and there are extensive data and various treatment options available for this genotype. Genotypes 2–6 are prevalent and may even predominate in different geographical regions, reflecting diverse factors including human migration patterns and unsafe use of injection drugs and blood products. Such factors are themselves influenced by socio‐economic factors, and poor regions often have the greatest unmet need for effective HCV therapies. The latest pan‐genotypic DAA combination regimens provide the potential to eradicate HCV around the globe, regardless of genotype, hence minimizing the need for virological testing services, which often are unavailable in poorer regions. Economics inevitably remain a barrier to access, and extensive cooperation will be required between clinical organisations and pharmaceutical manufacturers to agree appropriate pricing policies, especially in poorer economic regions. This review considers key data and treatment guidelines for DAA therapies, including pan‐genotypic combination regimens, in the context of regional differences in HCV genotype and socio‐economic factors.     

Efficacy of antepartum administration of hepatitis B immunoglobulin in preventing mother‐to‐child transmission of hepatitis B virus

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of antepartum administration of three doses of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in interrupting mother‐to‐child transmission (MTCT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV). In this trial, a total of 728 HBeAg‐positive pregnant women with chronic HBV infection who had an HBV DNA level higher than 6log₁₀ copies/mL were enrolled. They were divided into three groups based on individual preference. Subjects in group A and group B received 200 IU (unit) HBIG and 400 IU (unit) HBIG intramuscularly once a month at the third, second and first month before delivery, respectively. Subjects in the control group (C) received no special treatment. All the infants received passive‐active immunoprophylaxis. The HBsAg‐positive rate of all infants at 7‐12 months of age was 5.1% (37/728). Specifically, the HBsAg‐positive rate of infants was comparable in all three groups (5.3% vs 5.1% vs 5%, P = 0.988). No significant difference was found in anti‐HBs levels between the infants aged 7‐12 months in the three groups (P = 0.469). HBV DNA levels of the umbilical cord blood in the HBV‐infected group were higher than those in the uninfected group (5.2 vs 3.4log₁₀ copies/mL, P < 0.001), and these with family history of HBV infection were also higher (45.9% vs 28.5%, P = 0.034). To conclude, administration of passive‐active immunoprophylaxis to infants contributed to effective prevention of the MTCT of HBV; extra antepartum administration of HBIG during pregnancy could not decrease the rate of MTCT or increase the anti‐HBs levels of infants born to HBsAg‐positive mothers with HBV DNA higher than 6log₁₀ copies/mL.