Glutathione S-transferase gene polymorphisms and risk of gastric cancer in a Chinese population

Aim: The potential role of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms in risk of gastric cancer in Chinese was studied. Methods: We collected 194 gastric cancers by pathologic examination and 412 controls from southern China during January 2007 to January 2011. Genotyping was based upon duplex polymerase-chain-reaction withthe PCR-CTPP method. Results: Individuals carrying null GSTM1 and GSTT1 had 1.49 and 1.96 fold risk sof gastric cancer when compared with respective non-null genotypes. We also found a non-significant 37% excess risk of gastric cancer among carriers of GSTP1 1b/1b genotype when compared with 1a/1a genotype (OR=1.37, 95% CI=0.81-2.25). The combination of null/null GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes showed higher increased risk of gastric cancer (OR=3.17, 95% CI=1.68-4.21). Moreover, cancers in ever smokers and ever drinkers were observed to be strongly associated with null GSTM1 and GSTT1, and a significant cancer risk was observed in positive H.pylori infection individuals with null GSTT1. Conclusion: Our study provided evidence that genetic deletion of GSTM1 and GSTT1 may contribute to increased susceptibility to gastric cancer in our Chinese population, while the GSTP1a/b polymorphism may not.     

Genetic Polymorphism of GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 Genes and Susceptibility to Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

Background: The development of cancer results from an imbalance between exposure to carcinogens and the capacity of various enzyme systems engaged in activation or in the detoxification of xenobiotics. The aim of the present study is to investigate the association of GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms in susceptibility to Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML). Methods: A total of 200 CML patients and 100 controls were enrolled in a case-control study with GSTM1 and GSTT1 analysis with PCR and GSTP1 analysis with PCR-RFLP. Results: The GSTT1 null genotype was significantly higher among CML patients suggesting that this genotype is associated with an increased risk of CML. It was found in 42% of cases as compared with 21% of the controls, (OR =2.78, 95% CI: 1.59 - 4.85; p-value =0.000). The presence of the GSTT1 genotype may thus be considered a protective factor for CML. The frequency of individuals carrying GSTM1 null genotype was slightly higher in the control group but this difference was not statistically significant. The GSTM1 null genotype was present in 35% of control cases and 34% of the CML patients, (OR=0.975, 95%CI: 0.58-1.58;p-value=0.863). Individuals with a combined GSTM1 null/GSTT1null genotype had an estimated 2.85-fold increased risk of CML, but no associated risk between GSTP1 Ile 105 Val polymorphism and CML was found (OR=1.99, 95% CI: 0.40 - 9.32; p-value = 0.417). Conclusions: No association between GSTP1 and GSTM1 with susceptibility to CML was found. GSTT1 genotype may be a protective factor for CML, while the null genotype shows association with developing CML.     

Predictive Role of Glutathione-S-transferase Gene Polymorphisms in Risk and Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Aim: We conducted a prospective study in an Chinese population to detect associations of GSTM, GSTT andGSTP polymorphisms with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and analyze roles in determining survival outcome.Methods: A prospective follow-up study was conducted with 476 HCC patients and 481 controls collected fromMay 2005 to May 2007. All patients were followed up until the end of Dec. 2011. GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1genotyping were performed by PCR-CTPP methods. Results: Null GSTM1 carriers had a 1.64 fold risk of HCCcompared with non-null genotype, while GSTP1 Val/Val carriers had a 93% increased risk over the GSTP1IIe/IIe genotype. The median follow-up time for the 476 patients was 34.2 months (range: 1 to 78 months).Individuals with null GSTM1 genotype had better survival of HCC than non-null genotype carriers ( HR=0.71,95%CI=0.45-0.95). Similarly, GSTP1 Val/Val genotypes had significant better survival than the GSTP1 IIe/IIegenotype (HR=0.34, 95%CI=0.18-0.65). Individuals carrying null GSTM1 and GSTP1 Val/Val who receivedchemotherapy had lower risk of death from HCC than those without chemotherapy. Conclusion: This studyindicated carriage of null GSTM1 and GSTP1 Val/Val genotypes to have roles in susceptibility to and survivalfrom HCC.     

Glutathione S-transferase Polymorphisms and Bone Tumor Risk in China

Aim: We aimed to study the potential role of GSTM1 and GSTT1 in the risk of osteosarcoma in Chinese population. Methods: We collected 110 osteosarcomas by pathologic examination and 226 controls from the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University during December 2008 to December 2010. Genotyping was based upon duplex polymerase-chain-reaction with the PCR-CTPP method. Results: Individuals carrying null GSTM1 and GSTT1 had 1.50 and 2.07 fold risks of osteosarcoma when compared with non-null genotypes, respectively. The increased risk associated with the GSTT1 polymorphism seemed more evident among males (Null GSTT1 genotype vs. non-null genotype, adjusted OR= 2.43, 95% CI: 1.29-3.30) than females (adjusted OR =1.66, 95% CI: 1.02-2.78). The increased risk was also more evident among individuals aged 15 years or less (adjusted OR for null GSTT1 genotype vs. non-null genotype = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.20-3.24) than those aged more than 15 years (adjusted OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.07-2.95). Conclusion: Our study of the association between polymorphisms in GSTM1 and GSTTI and the risk of osteosarcoma in a Chinese population provided evidence that null GSTTI might be a useful marker of susceptibility to osteosarcoma development, especially for male sand young age individuals.     

Genetic Polymorphisms of Xenobiotic Metabolizing Genes (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1), Gene-Gene Interaction with Association to Lung Cancer Risk in North India; A Case Control Study

Aim: In this case control study involving, 220 human subjects; polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing genes (GST-M1, -T1 and -P1) and their association to lung cancer risk is being analysed among smokers and non-smokers. GSTM1 or GSTT1 gene polymorphism and amino acid changes in GSTP1 have been correlated and may be associated to lung cancer risk. Other factor includes exposure to environmental pollutants and life style choices. We have explored gene-gene and gene-environment interaction in the aetiology of lung cancer risk among north Indian population. Patients and Methods: For the study we have collected 120 lung cancer patient blood samples from Kamala Nehru Memorial Cancer Hospital, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh and 100 matched controls. DNA was isolated and GST-M1 and - T1 genotyping were assessed by multiplex PCR whereas the GSTP1 polymorphism was analysed using restriction fragment length polymorphism. The risk of lung carcinogenesis was assessed using logistic regression analysis calculating the odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The risk of lung carcinogenesis was three fold higher for null GSTT1 (OR=3.045, 95%CI=1.750-5.301, p-value <0.001) genotype; whereas other two types; GSTM1 (OR= 1.342, 95% CI=0.788-2.284, p-value=0.270) and GSTP1 (OR=0.806, 95% CI=0.526-1.236, p-value=0.323) showed no association to lung cancer susceptibility respectively. Smokers diagnosed with lung cancer had more null genotypes for GSTT1 (OR=4.773, 95%CI=1.939-11.751, p<0.001). The ‘at risk’ genotype combination GSTM1 (null) /GSTT1 (null) (OR=1.76, 95%CI; 0.920-3.370, p-value=0.03) showed increased susceptibility to lung cancer risk. The genotype combination of GSTT1 (null)/GSTP1 (Ile/Ile) (p=0.009) was associated with increased lung cancer risk. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that; GSTT1 null genotype were more susceptible for lung cancer risk and smoking increases the susceptibility for lung cancer several folds among the North Indian population. Gene-gene interaction for null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 were correlated with higher risk of having lung cancer.     

谷胱甘肽转移酶T1和M1基因多态性及吸烟与结直肠癌关系的对照研究

目的　研究谷胱甘肽转移酶 (GSTs)M1、T1基因多态性与结直肠癌易感性的关系。方法12 6例结直肠癌患者和 343例随机抽样的正常对照者 ,应用多重聚合酶链反应 (PCR)方法检测其GSTM1和GSTT1基因多态性 ,采用非条件Logistic回归模型分析基因型、吸烟情况与结直肠癌患病的关系。结果　GSTM1和GSTT1缺陷型基因型在对照人群中的频率分布为 5 5 .5 %和 2 0 .4 %。在GSTT1缺陷型基因型的人群中 ,GSTM1缺陷型患直肠癌风险是非缺陷型者的 9.74倍 (95 %CI为 1.13～83.85 )。现在吸烟者中 ,GSTM1缺陷型基因型患结肠癌的风险是非缺陷型者的 2 .2 2倍 (P >0 .0 5 ) ;GSTT1缺陷型基因型患结肠癌的风险是非缺陷型者的 4 .5 5倍 (95 %CI为 1.14～ 18.17) ,患直肠癌的风险是非缺陷型者的 4 .6 0倍 (95 %CI为 1.11～ 19.11)。结论　GSTM1和GSTT1缺陷型基因型有可能增加结直肠癌的危险性 ,其危险性主要表现在两者的联合作用上 ;环境暴露因素———吸烟和相关代谢酶多态性也表现出增加结直肠癌危险性的联合作用。     

GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 genetic polymorphisms and interaction with tobacco, alcohol and occupational exposure in esophageal cancer patients from North India

Glutathione S-transferases(GSTs) are detoxification enzymes that provide critical defense against carcinogens. Our hypothesis was that altered frequencies of GST genotypes and environmental exposures might be associated with increased susceptibility for the development of esophageal cancer. A total of 100 esophageal cancer patients and 137 age and gender matched healthy controls were analyzed for GST polymorphisms. Frequencies of GSTT1 null, GSTM1 null and GSTP1 genotypes did not differ between patients and controls. However, a two-fold risk was observed for GSTM1 null genotype in adenocarcinoma (OR(odds ratio) 2.1; 95% CI(confidence intervals)=0.53-8.6). Further, we used a case only design to study gene-environment interactions in esophageal cancer. In patients with smoking habits, GSTM1 null and GSTP1 ile/ile genotype were at higher risk for esophageal cancer (OR 1.5; 95% CI=0.50-4.4 and OR 1.3; 95% CI=0.40-3.5), respectively. A moderate risk for cancer was observed from alcohol usage along with GSTM1 null(OR 1.3; 95% CI=0.50-3.6) and GSTP1 val/val genotypes(OR 1.2; 95% CI=0.20-5.7). Interaction of GST genotypes with occupational exposure did not affect risk for esophageal cancer. These findings suggest that genetic polymorphisms of GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 are not associated with higher risk of esophageal cancer. However, interaction of smoking or alcohol with GSTM1 null or GSTP1 ile/ile moderately increases the risk for esophageal cancer in North Indian population.     

GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphism and lung cancer risk in relation to tobacco smoking

The impact of genetic polymorphisms in GSTM1, GSTP1 or GSTT1 on susceptibility to lung cancer has received particular interest since these enzymes play a central role in detoxification of major classes of tobacco carcinogens. In the current German study we investigated the role of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms as a genetic modifier of risk for individuals with lung cancer as susceptible genotypes especially in relation to tobacco smoking. The GSTM1, the GSTP1 as well as GSTT1-polymorphism were determined by real time PCR analysis in 446 lung cancer patients and 622 controls. The observed allele frequencies of the GSTP1 polymorphism in the population were within the range described for Caucasians. Multivariate analyses of lung cancer patients, who carried at least one mutant variant allele of GSTP1 (OR=1.03; 95%-CI: 0.76-1.39) did not show any elevated risks. GSTM1 or GSTT1 null-genotypes were found in 47.3% resp. 18.5% of the controls and in 52.5% resp. 16.8% of the cancer patients. The estimated risk of the GSTM1 null genotype for lung cancer was OR=1.34 (95%-CI: 0.99-1.81) and for the GSTT1 null genotype OR=0.88 (95%-CI: 0.59-1.32). When analyzed by histology no individual subtype of lung cancer was strongly associated with the polymorphisms. Lung cancer risk rose significantly with higher cumulative cigarette consumption confirming the association with smoking-related lung cancer risk. Stratified analysis between tobacco smoking and variant genotypes revealed for heavy smokers (>60 pack-years) increasing risks at the presence for at least one copy of the GSTP1 variant allele OR=50.56 (95%-CI: 15.52-164.79). The corresponding risks for GSTM1 null genotypes were OR=112.08 (95%-CI: 23.02-545.71) and for the GSTT1 null-genotype OR=158.49 (95%-CI: 17.75-1415.06) in smokers >60 pack-years. Analysing the interaction between tobacco smoking and the genotypes, combined smoking and having the susceptible genotypes did not show a joint effect. In this study polymorphisms of the GSTM1, GSTT1 or GSTP1 had no relevant modifying effect on lung cancer risk and cumulative smoking dose.     

Lung cancer susceptibility and polymorphisms of glutathione-S-transferase genes in Hong Kong

OBJECTIVE: To study the potential role of genetic polymorphisms of glutathione-S-transferases GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 in susceptibility to lung cancer in Hong Kong Chinese. METHODS: 229 consecutive incident patients with a histological diagnosis of lung cancer from a regional hospital and 197 healthy population-based controls were recruited for this study between July 1999 and June 2001. Genetic polymorphisms of GSTT1 and GSTM1 were determined using PCR-based technique. RESULTS: The frequencies of GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes were 51.8 and 59.4% in healthy controls and 63 and 54.7%, respectively, in lung cancer patients. GSTP1 Val105/Val105 genotype was found in only 1% of healthy controls. The risk for lung cancer with GSTT1 null genotype was significantly higher, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-2.56, compared with those with the GSTT1 genotype; the increase in risk was found only in non-smokers. GSTM1 null genotype, combined GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotype and GSTP1 Val105/Val105 genotype did not confer any increase risk for lung cancer. CONCLUSION: GSTT1 null genotype is associated with an increased risk for lung cancer in non-smoking Chinese in Hong Kong.     

Impact of GSTT1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and NAT2 genotypes on KRAS2 and TP53 gene mutations in colorectal cancer

Which carcinogens are of influence in the development of human colorectal cancers remains a question; one answer could be the finding that specific polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes are related to particular mutations in cancer genes. KRAS2 and TP53 gene mutations as well as genotypes for GSTM1, GSTP1, GSTT1 and NAT2 were determined in an exploratory series of 165 stable colorectal cancers. Mutations in KRAS2 and TP53 were found in 34% and 57.5% of cases, respectively. The KRAS2 mutation frequency was significantly lower in patients with a GSTT1 null genotype than in those with a GSTT1 non-null genotype (18% vs. 38%, p = 0.03). The overall risk of KRAS2 mutation for patients with distal colorectal cancer and GSTT1 null genotype was 0.3 (95% CI 0.1-0.9) compared to patients with distal colorectal cancer and non-null GSTT1 genotype. The overall risk of KRAS2 mutation was similarly reduced (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9) for patients with distal colorectal cancer and GSTP1 mutated genotypes compared to patients with distal colorectal cancer and wild-type genotype. Patients with GSTP1 wild-type genotype appeared to be at significantly lower risk for TP53 mutation compared to patients with mutated genotypes (p = 0.023). Our results suggest that GSTT1 and GSTP1 could play a role in the occurrence of KRAS2 and TP53 mutations in colorectal cancer and generate a hypothesis on the dietary factors that could be incriminated.     

Gluthatione-S-transferase T1-null Genotype Predisposes Adults to Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia; a Case-Control Study

Polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase (GST) proteins are correlated with elevated risk of many cancersincluding hematologic malignancies. Particularly concerning acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), the studies onassociation between GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 and the disease predisposition are scarce and contradictory. Theaim of this study was to examine whether polymorphic variations in GST confer susceptibility to APL. GSTM1and GSTT1 null and GSTP1 Ile105Val alleles were determined using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) andPCR-RFLP, respectively, in 114 APL patients and 99 healthy controls. Frequency of GSTT1 null and GSTM1null genotypes were higher in APL group which it was statistically significant for GSTT1 null (p< 0.01). TheGSTM1 null and GSTT1 null conferred a 1.36-fold (OR= 1.36, 95% CI = 0.79-2.33, p= 0.18) and 2.14-fold (OR=2.14; 95% CI: 1.18-3.92, p= 0.013) increase in risk of APL, respectively, relative to the presence of the GSTM1 orGSTT1 genes. GSTP1 Ile105/Val105 and Val105/Val105 genotypes showed no increase in the risk of APL (OR=0.94; 95% CI: 0.52-1.67 and OR= 1.12; 95% CI: 0.48-2.60, respectively). Our results suggest that GSTT1 nullgenotype may be associated with increased risk of APL.     

Glulathione-S-transferases Gene Polymorphism in Prediction of Gastric Cancer Risk by Smoking and Helicobacter Pylori Infection Status

Aim: To evaluate the association of glutathione S-transferases gene polymorphisms with the risk of gastriccancer, with reference to smoking and Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods: We conducted a 1:1 matched casecontrolstudy with 410 gastric cancer cases and 410 cancer-free controls. Polymorphisms of GSTM1, GSTT1 andGSTP1 were determined using PCR-CTPP. Results: The GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes were significantlyassociated with the risk of gastric cancer after adjusting for potential confounding factors (OR=1.68, 95%CI=1.32-2.23 for null GSTM1, OR=1.73; 95% CI=1.24-2.13 for null GSTT1). The combination of null GSTM1and null GSTT1 conferred an elevated risk (OR=2.54, 95% CI=1.55-3.39). However, no association was foundfor GSTP1 polymorphism The smoking modified the association of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes withthe risk of gastric cancer. Conclusion: GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes are associated with increased risk ofgastric cancer, and smoking modifies the association.     

Glutathione-S-transferase (GSTM1, GSTT1) Null Phenotypes and Risk of Lung Cancer in a Korean Population

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate any association of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes withthe risk of lung cancer in a South Korean population. Methods: We conducted a large-scale, population-basedcase-control study including 3,933 lung cancer cases and 1,699 controls. Genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 weredetermined using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results: In logistic regression analysis adjusted for age andsmoking, we did not find any association between GSTM1 or GSTT1 and LC risk in women. However, in men,the GSTM1 and GSTTI null genotypes were borderline associated with risk (OR=1.18, 95% CI=0.99-1.41 forGSTM1, OR=1.18, 95% CI=0.99-1.41 for GSTT1), and combined GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes conferredan increased risk for LC in men (OR=1.39, 95% CI=1.08–1.78). The OR for the GSTT1 null genotype was greaterin subjects aged 55 years old or younger (OR=1.45, 95% CI=1.09-1.92 for men; OR=1.36, 95% CI=0.97–1.90for women), than in those over age 55 (OR=1.03, 95% CI=0.83-1.27 for men; OR=0.86, 95% CI=0.66–1.12 forwomen) in both genders (p for interaction <0.05). Conclusions: In the Korean population, the GSTM1 andGSTT1 null genotypes are risk factors for LC in men; the GSTT1 null genotype has a more prominent effecton LC risk in younger people (age 55 years and under) than in older individuals.     

Meta-analysis of the association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms and cervical cancer

Aim: We conducted a meta-analysis to analyze the influence of GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms on cervical cancer risk, and explore gene-environment interactions. Methods: Identification of relevant studies was carried out through a search of Medline and the EMbase up to Oct. 2011. All case-control studies that investigated the association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms and risk of cervical cancer were included. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was used for analyses of results and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Results: A total of 21 case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis of GSTM1 (2,378 cases and 2,639 controls) and GSTT1 (1,229 cases and 1,223 controls) genotypes. The overall results showed that the GSTM1 null was related to an increased risk of cervical cancer (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.21-1.85). Subgroup analysis were performed based on smoking and ethnicity. Our results showed that smokers with null GSTM1 genotype had a moderate increased risk of cervical cancer (OR=1.85, 95% CI=1.07-3.20). For the ethnicity stratification, moderate significantly increased risk of null GSTM1 genotype was found in Chinese (OR=2.12, 95% CI=1.43-3.15) and Indian populations (OR=2.07, 95% CI=1.49-2.88), but no increased risk was noted in others. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provided strong evidence that the GSTM1 genotype is associated with the development of cervical cancer, especially in smokers, and Chinese and Indian populations. However, no association was found for GSTT1 null genotype carriers.     

Marine n-3 fatty acid intake, glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal Chinese women in Singapore

We have previously found marine n-3 fatty acids to be inversely related to post-menopausal breast cancer in Chinese women from Singapore. Post-menopausal women with high [quartiles 2-4 (Q2-Q4)] versus low [quartile 1 (Q1)] intake exhibited a statistically significant reduction in risk of breast cancer after adjustment for potential confounders [relative risk (RR) = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.50, 0.87]. Experimental studies have demonstrated a direct role for the peroxidation products of marine n-3 fatty acids in breast cancer protection. There is a suggestion that the glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) may be major catalysts in the elimination of these beneficial by-products. Therefore, we hypothesized that individuals possessing the low activity genotypes of GSTM1, GSTT1 and/or GSTP1 (i.e. the GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null and GSTP1 AB/BB genotypes, respectively) may exhibit a stronger marine n-3 fatty acid-breast cancer association than their high activity counterparts. The Singapore Chinese Health Study is a prospective investigation involving 35,298 middle-aged and older women, who were enrolled between April 1993 and December 1998. In this case-control analysis, nested within the Singapore Chinese Health Study, we compared 258 incident breast cancer cases with 670 cohort controls. Overall, breast cancer risk was unrelated to GSTM1 and GSTP1 genotypes. However, the GSTT1 null genotype was associated with a 30% reduced risk of breast cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.52, 0.96]. Among women with high activity GST genotypes (i.e. GSTM1 positive, GSTT1 positive and GSTP1 AA), no marine n-3 fatty acid-breast cancer relationships were observed in either pre-menopausal or post-menopausal women at baseline. However, post-menopausal women possessing the combined GSTM1 null and GSTP1 AB/BB genotypes showed a statistically significant reduction in risk after adjustment for potential confounders (Q2-Q4 versus Q1, OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.14, 0.94). A similar relationship was observed among women with the combined GSTT1 null and GSTP1 AB/BB genotypes (OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.08, 0.78).     

Meta- and pooled analyses of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, and CYP1A1 genotypes and risk of head and neck cancer.

Sequence variation in the GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, and CYP1A1 genes may potentially alter susceptibility to head and neck cancers, although evidence from previous studies has not been consistent. To explore these associations, we conducted a meta-analysis of 31 published case-control studies (4635 cases and 5770 controls) and a pooled analysis of original data from nine published and two unpublished case-control studies (2334 cases and 2766 controls). In the meta-analysis, the summary odds ratios (ORs) for head and neck cancer were 1.23 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.06-1.42] for the GSTM1 null genotype, 1.17 (95% CI, 0.98-1.40) for the GSTT1 null genotype, 1.10 (95% CI, 0.92-1.31) for carrying the GSTP1 Val105 allele, and 1.35 (95% CI, 0.95-1.82) for carrying the CYP1A1 Val462 allele. The pooled analysis ORs were 1.32 (95% CI, 1.07-1.62) for the GSTM1 null genotype, 1.25 (95% CI, 1.00-1.57) for the GSTT1 null genotype, 1.15 (95% CI, 0.86-1.53) for carrying the GSTP1 Val105 allele, and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.75-1.29) for carrying the CYP1A1 Val462 allele. Increasing risk of head and neck cancer was observed with inheritance of increasing numbers of modest risk genotypes at the three GST loci (P for trend = 0.04), with the combination of carrying the GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null, and GSTP1 Val105 alleles conferring an OR of 2.06 (95% CI, 1.11-3.81). In conclusion, both the meta- and pooled analysis support modest associations of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes with head and neck cancer risk, and our pooled analysis supports the notion of greater risk when genotypes at multiple GST loci are considered in a multigenic model.     

GST genetic polymorphisms and lung adenocarcinoma susceptibility in a Chinese population

Lung adenocarcinoma (AC) has been increasing over the last several decades in many countries, including China. Some of the glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) demonstrate polymorphisms which may play a role in lung AC susceptibility. Our previous study of a Chinese population found the GSTM1 null genotype to be associated with an increased risk of lung AC, and the combination of GSTM1 null genotype and CYP2E1 wild type conferred a significantly elevated risk. Here, we extended the study to investigate the potential role of GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms in likelihood of development of lung AC, either separately or in combination. This case-control study encompassed 112 cases with lung ACs and 119 age- and gender-matched cancer-free controls from Beijing. The frequencies for the GSTM1 null genotype were 61.6 and 50.4% among cases and controls, and for the GSTT1 null genotype 47.3 and 45.4%, respectively. The distribution of the GSTP1 Ile/Ile, Ile/Val and Val/Val genotypes was 59.8, 39.3 and 0.9% in cases, and 70.6, 28.6 and 0.8% in controls, respectively. No relationship between lung AC and the GSTT1 genotype was observed in the present study, either separately or in combination with the GSTM1 or GSTP1 genotypes. Although separate GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms were not statistically related to lung AC, the combination of GSTM1 null and GSTP1 Val was significantly associated with an elevated lung AC risk (OR=2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.1).     

Risk Effects of GST Gene Polymorphisms in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Prospective Study

Glutathione S-transferase (GST) enzyme levels are associated with risk of many cancers, including hematologictumours. We here aimed to investigate the relationships between GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms andthe risk of AML. Genotyping of GSTs was based upon duplex polymerase-chain-reactions with the confrontingtwo-pair primer (PCR-CTPP) method in 163 cases and 204 controls. Individuals carrying null GSTT1 genotypehad a 1.64 fold risk of acute leukemia relative to a non-null genotype (P<0.05). A heavy risk was observed inthose carrying combination of null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 and GSTP1 Val allele genotypes whencompared with those carrying wild genotypes, with an OR (95% CI) of 3.39 (1.26-9.26) (P<0.05). These findingsindicate that genetic variants of GST and especially the GSTT1 gene have a critical function in the developmentof AML. Our study offers important insights into the molecular etiology of AML.     

Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and oral cancer: a case-control study in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

This study evaluates the influence of genetic polymorphisms at GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 gene loci on oral cancer susceptibility among Brazilians from Rio de Janeiro. DNA extracted from white blood cells of 231 oral cancer patients and 212 hospital controls was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) methods. GSTM1 polymorphism distribution was different between cases and controls (P=0.006), with an overrepresentation of GSTM1 A/B genotype in controls. GSTM1 A/B individuals were at decreased oral cancer risk (OR=0.08; 95% CI=0.05-0.62). No statistically significant association was observed for GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms. Differences in the GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotype frequencies were observed between individuals of European origin and African origin, but these genotypes do not seem to influence the risk of oral cancer. Therefore, these results do not support the hypothesis of increased risk of GSTP1 G/G, GSTM1 or GSTT1 null genotypes for developing cancer in oral cavity, but the GSTM1 A/B genotype emerged as a protective factor.     

Predictive Role of GSTs on the Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of GST gene polymorphisms with regard to prognosis of breastcancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: A total of 159 patients were included in our studybetween January 2005 and January 2007. All the patients were followed up until January 2012. Genotypingwas based upon the duplex polymerase-chain-reaction with the PCR-CTPP method. Results: Patients withnull GSTM1 and GSTP1 Val/Val genotypes had significantly had better response rates to chemotherapy whencompared with non-null GSTM1 and GSTP1 Ile/ Ile genotypes (OR=1.96 and OR=2.14, respectively). Patientswith the GSTM1 null genotype had a longer average survival time and significantly lower risk of death thandid those with non-null genotypes (HR=0.66). Similarly, those carrying the GSTP1 Val/Val genotype had 0.54-fold the risk of death of those with GSTP1 Ile/ Ile (HR=0.54). Conclusion: A significant association was foundbetween GSTM1 and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms and clinical outcomes in breast cancer cases.