Effect of contralateral cane use on hip moment impulse in the frontal plane during the stance phase

BackgroundRecent reports have shown that the daily cumulative moment in the frontal plane (i.e., product of hip moment impulse in the frontal plane during the stance phase and mean steps per day) is a risk factor for hip osteoarthritis. This study aimed to clarify the effect of contralateral cane use on hip moment impulse in the frontal plane of the stance limb.MethodsThis study included 15 healthy subjects who walked under four experimental conditions: (1) without a cane and (2–4) contralateral cane use with 10%, 15%, and 20% body weight support (BWS), respectively. To maintain the same walking speed in all conditions, the cadence was set to 80 steps/min, and the step length was fixed. The hip moment impulses in the frontal plane (i.e., area under the hip ab-adduction moment waveform) and peak hip adduction moments in all conditions were calculated.ResultsContralateral cane use significantly decreased the hip moment impulse in the frontal plane and peak hip adduction moment compared to non-cane use. Moreover, the hip moment impulse in the frontal plane and peak hip adduction moment decreased significantly with increased cane BWS. There were no significant differences in walking speed, cadence, and step length between the four conditions.ConclusionContralateral cane use decreases the hip moment impulse in the frontal plane and peak hip adduction moment in the stance limb. These findings may help clarify how to delay the progression of hip osteoarthritis.     

Effects of body weight support and pedal stance width on joint loading during pinnacle trainer exercise

BackgroundA pinnacle trainer is a stair climber that has a biplane exercise trajectory and an adjustable pedal stance width (PSW). A pinnacle trainer integrated with a body weight support (BWS) system can help overweight individuals or individuals with poor balance exercise safely by reducing excessive or improper joint loads, preventing training-related injuries. However, few studies have investigated the biomechanical features of the lower extremities during pinnacle trainer exercise with and without partial BWS for various PSWs.Research questionWe aimed to investigate the effects of partial BWS and PSW on the joint loading of the lower extremities during stepping on a pinnacle trainer.MethodsSeventeen healthy adults exercised on the pinnacle trainer with or without BWS using various PSWs. The joint resultant forces and joint moments of the lower extremities were calculated according to the kinematic and kinetic data measured via a motion capture system and force transducers on the pedals, respectively.ResultsThe joint resultant forces and joint moments of the lower extremities significantly decreased with increasing percentage of BWS. The internal knee adduction moment and internal hip abduction moment significantly increased with increasing PSW. For every kilogram of BWS, the joint loading of the lower extremities decreased by approximately 1% of the joint resultant forces of body weight during exercise with the pinnacle trainer.SignificanceExercise on the pinnacle trainer with partial BWS significantly reduced joint loading. Exercise with a wider pedal stance may be helpful for knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation as it produces greater internal hip abduction and internal knee adduction moments.     

Comparing walking biomechanics of older females in maximal,minimal, and traditional shoes

BackgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease that affects millions of individuals each year. Several biomechanical variables during walking have been identified as risk factors for developing knee OA, including the peak external knee adduction moment (KAM) and the knee flexion angle at initial contact. Many interventions have been studied to help mitigate these risk factors, including footwear. However, it is largely unknown how varying shoe cushioning may affect walking biomechanics related to knee OA risk.Research QuestionWhat is the effect of maximally and minimally cushioned shoes on walking biomechanics compared to a traditionally cushioned shoe in older females?MethodsWalking biomechanics in three shoes (maximal, traditional, minimal) were collected on 16 healthy females ages 50–70 using an 8-camera 3D motion capture system and two embedded force plates. Key biomechanical variables related to knee OA disease risk were compared between shoes using repeated measures ANOVAs.ResultsThe KAM was significantly larger in the maximal shoe (p = 0.005), while the knee flexion angle at initial contact was significantly larger in both the maximal and minimal shoe compared to the traditional shoe (p = .000). Additionally, the peak knee flexion angle (p = .000) and the loading rates of the vertical ground reaction force were (instantaneous: p = 0.001; average: p = .010) were significantly higher in the minimal shoe.SignificanceWhile these results are specific to the shoes used in this study, clinicians should exercise caution in prescribing maximal or minimal shoes to females in this age group who may be at risk of knee OA given these results. Research is needed on the effect of these shoes in patients with knee OA.     

Gait asymmetry pattern following stroke determines acute response to locomotor task

BackgroundGiven the prevalence of gait dysfunction following stroke, walking recovery is a primary goal of rehabilitation. However, current gait rehabilitation approaches fail to demonstrate consistent benefits. Gait asymmetry, prevalent among stroke survivors who regain the ability to walk, is associated with an increased energy cost of walking and is a significant predictor of falls post-stroke. Furthermore, differential patterns of gait asymmetry may respond differently to gait training parameters.Research questionThe purpose of this study was to determine whether differential responses to locomotor task condition occur on the basis of step length asymmetry pattern (Symmetrical, NP_short, P_short) observed during overground walking.MethodsParticipants first walked overground at their self-selected walking speed. Overground data were compared against three task conditions all tested during treadmill walking: self-selected speed with 0% body weight support (TM); self-selected speed with 30 % body weight support (BWS); and fastest comfortable speed with 30 % body weight support and nonparetic leg guidance (Guidance_NP). Our primary metrics were: symmetry indices of step length, stride length, and single limb support duration.ResultsWe identified differences in the response to locomotor task conditions for each step length asymmetry subgroup. Guidance_NP induced an acute spatial symmetry only in the NP_short group and temporal symmetry in the Symmetrical and P_short groups. Importantly, we found the TM and BWS conditions were insufficient to impact either spatial or temporal gait symmetry.SignificanceTask conditions consistent with locomotor training do not produce uniform effects across subpatterns of gait asymmetry. We identified differential responses to locomotor task conditions between groups with distinct asymmetry patterns, suggesting these subgroups may require unique intervention strategies. Despite group differences in asymmetry characteristics, improvements in symmetry noted in each group were driven by changes in both the paretic and nonparetic limbs.     

Dynamic knee joint stiffness and contralateral knee joint loading during prolonged walking in patients with unilateral knee osteoarthritis

BackgroundLong duration walking, a commonly recommended treatment option for knee osteoarthritis (OA), may lead to increased knee joint loading.Research questionTo evaluate the effects of prolonged walking on dynamic knee joint stiffness and contralateral knee joint contact forces (KCFs) in individuals with unilateral symptomatic knee OA.MethodsTwenty-six older adults with knee OA completed a 45-minute bout of walking on a treadmill. Dynamic knee joint stiffness, estimated KCFs, measured ground reaction forces (GRFs), and simulated muscle forces were evaluated for both the symptomatic and asymptomatic limbs at 15-minute intervals using repeated measures, analysis of variance (ANOVA).ResultsDynamic knee joint stiffness during the early weight-acceptance phase of gait was significantly higher for the symptomatic limb throughout the 45-minute bout of walking. A significant increase in peak KCFs and simulated muscle forces were also observed during the weight-acceptance phase of gait for both limbs after 30 and 45 min of walking. Additionally, significantly elevated peak KCFs and muscle forces were observed during the late-stance phase of gait for the contralateral asymptomatic limb throughout the 45-minute bout of walking.SignificanceWalking durations of 30 min or greater lead to increased knee joint loading. Additionally, the elevated dynamic knee joint stiffness observed for the symptomatic knee during the weight acceptance phase of gait appears to be unrelated to the knee joint loading profile. Finally, the greater KCFs during the late-stance phase of gait observed for the asymptomatic limb are consistent with previously demonstrated risk factors for OA development and progression.     

Effects of prolonged walking with body borne load on knee adduction biomechanics

BackgroundSoldiers that suffer a service-related knee musculoskeletal injury routinely develop joint osteoarthritis. Knee osteoarthritis is a substantial and costly problem among soldiers, yet it is unknown how body borne load and duration of walking impact knee adduction biomechanics linked to progression and severity of osteoarthritis.Research questionThis study determined the adaptations in magnitude and variability of knee adduction joint angle (KAA) and moment (KAM) during prolonged walking with body borne load.MethodsThirteen recreationally active participants had knee biomechanics quantified while walking over-ground for 60-min at 1.3 m/s with three body borne loads (0, 15, and 30 kg). Magnitude and variability of KAA and KAM measures were quantified and submitted to a RM ANOVA to test the main effect and interactions between load (0, 15 and 30 kg) and time (0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min).ResultsBody borne load increased peak KAM (p < 0.001), whereas time increased peak and range of KAA (both: p < 0.001). Specifically, peak KAM increased with each addition of body borne load (all: p < 0.025), and peak and range of KAA increased after 30 min of walking (both: p < 0.040). Neither body borne load, nor time had a significant effect on KAA or KAM variability (both: p > 0.05).SignificanceProlonged walking with heavy body borne load increased knee adduction biomechanics related to osteoarthritis. Adding heavy body borne load increased in peak KAM whereas duration of walking increased KAA, knee biomechanics that may increase loading of the medial knee joint compartment and risk of OA at the joint.     

Effect of altered sagittal-plane knee kinematics on loading during the early stance phase of gait

BackgroundIndividuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) show various dynamic sagittal-plane changes during the early stance phase of gait. However, the effect of these kinematic alterations on knee load during the early stance remains poorly understood. Research question: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of altered sagittal- plane knee kinematics on knee load during the early stance.MethodsA total of 13 healthy adult men underwent gait analysis trials using four conditions (baseline and three altered conditions). The three altered conditions were defined as follows:1) Less flexion (LF): a gait that decreased knee flexion excursion (KFE) owing to a reduced peak knee flexion angle compared to baseline.2) Initial flexion (IF): a gait with decreased KFE owing to an increased knee flexion angle at initial contact, during which the peak knee flexion angle did not differ from baseline.3) Flexion gait (FG): a gait that increased the knee flexion angle at initial contact but did not reduce KFE compared with the baseline.Data analyzed included peak external knee flexion moment (KFM), KFM impulse (impulse was an integral value from initial contact to peak value), peak vertical ground reaction force (VGRF), and maximum loading rate.ResultsBoth LF and IF conditions significantly decreased peak VGRF (p < 0.05) compared with the baseline. Peak KFM decreased in the LF condition and increased in the FG condition versus baseline (p < 0.05). A significantly increased KFM impulse was found in both IF and FG conditions when compared with baseline (p < 0.05).SignificanceAn increase in knee flexion angle during early stance increased knee loading. Interventions are likely required for improving excessive knee flexion during early stance phase of gait in individuals with knee OA.     

Effect of exercise on knee joint contact forces in people following medial partial meniscectomy: A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundArthroscopic partial meniscectomy may cause knee osteoarthritis, which may be related to altered joint loading. Previous research has failed to demonstrate that exercise can reduce medial compartment knee loads following meniscectomy but has not considered muscular loading in their estimates.Research questionWhat is the effect of exercise compared to no intervention on peak medial tibiofemoral joint contact force during walking using an electromyogram-driven neuromusculoskeletal model, following medial arthroscopic partial meniscectomy?MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (RCT). 41 participants aged between 30–50 years with medial arthroscopic partial meniscectomy within the past 3–12 months, were randomly allocated to either a 12-week, home-based, physiotherapist-guided exercise program or to no exercise (control group). Three-dimensional lower-body motion, ground reaction forces, and surface electromyograms from eight lower-limb muscles were acquired during self-selected normal- and fast-paced walking at baseline and follow-up. An electromyogram-driven neuromusculoskeletal model estimated medial compartment contact forces (body weight). Linear regression models evaluated between-group differences (mean difference (95% CI)).ResultsThere were no significant between-group differences in the change (follow-up minus baseline) in first peak medial contact force during self-selected normal- or fast-paced walking (0.07 (−0.08 to 0.23), P = 0.34 and 0.01 (−0.19 to 0.22), P = 0.89 respectively). No significant between-group difference was found for change in second peak medial contact force during normal- or fast-paced walking (0.09 (−0.09 to 0.28), P = 0.31 and 0.02 (−0.17 to 0.22), P = 0.81 respectively). At the individual level, variability was observed for changes in first (range −26.2% to +31.7%) and second (range −46.5% to +59.9%) peak tibiofemoral contact force.SignificanceThis is the first study to apply electromyogram-driven neuromusculoskeletal modelling to an exercise intervention in a RCT. While our results suggest that a 12-week exercise program does not alter peak medial knee loads after meniscectomy, within-participant variability suggests individual-specific muscle activation patterns that warrant further investigation.     

Kinematic changes in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis are a result of reduced walking speed rather than disease severity

BackgroundKinematic changes in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been extensively studied. Concerns have been raised whether the measured spatiotemporal and kinematic alterations are associated with disease progression or merely a result of reduced walking speed.Research question: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of walking speed on kinematic parameters in patients with knee OA using statistical parametric mapping (SPM).MethodsTwenty-three patients with unilateral knee OA scheduled for a total knee replacement and 28 age matched control subjects were included in this study. Spatiotemporal parameters and sagittal plane kinematics were measured in the hip, knee, and ankle using the inertial sensors system RehaGait® while walking at a self-selected normal (patients and controls) and slow walking speed (controls) for a distance of 20 m. Gait parameters were compared between groups for self-selected walking speed and for matched walking speed using SPM with independent sample t tests.ResultsAt self-selected walking speed, patients had significantly lower knee flexion during stance (maximum difference, -6.8°) and during swing (-11.0°), as well as higher ankle dorsiflexion during stance phase (+12.5°) and lower peak hip extension at the end of stance compared to controls (+4.2°). At matched speed, there were no significant differences in joint kinematics between groups.SignificanceDifferences in sagittal plane gait kinematics between patients with knee OA and asymptomatic controls appear to be mainly a result of reduced walking speed. These results emphasize the importance of considering walking speed in research on gait kinematics in patients with knee OA and in clinical trials using gait parameters as outcome measures.     

Kinetic parameters during land and water walking performed by individuals with Down Syndrome

BackgroundDown Syndrome (DS) is a genetic condition presenting delay in acquisition of main motor milestones, such as walking. Although studies have been investigating the biomechanical parameters during land walking performed by individual with DS, the literature is scarce regarding kinetic parameters analysis in this population, specially during water walking.Research questionThis study sought to assess the vertical ground reaction force (Fz) of walking performed in water and on land at different speeds by individuals with DS.MethodsFourteen adults with DS (age: 27.9 ± 7.9 years; body mass: 58.4 ± 12.9 kg; height: 1.4 ± 0.1 m, body mass index: 29.2 ± 5.4 kg.m^-2) completed two sessions of data collection, one on land and another in aquatic environment. The protocol consisted of walking performed at three self-selected speeds (slow, comfortable and fast) in randomized order. The Fz was assessed with a waterproof force plate in each condition. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (environment and speed), with Bonferroni’s post hoc tests, were used for analysis. A significance level was set as α = 0.05.ResultsSignificant differences were observed between environments (p < 0.001), with reduced first peak of Fz (68-73%), second peak of Fz (66-70%), loading rate (75-78%) and impulse (40-41%) in the water walking for all speeds analyzed. In the aquatic environment, no significant difference was observed for the first and second Fz peaks with the increasing speed of walking. Moreover, the loading rate significantly increased (p = 0.019) as the impulse significantly reduced (p < 0.001) in the higher speeds.SignificanceIndividuals with DS present reduced Fz outcomes during water walking in comparison to land. Therefore, water walking may be performed by individuals with DS with safe vertical loads on lower limbs regardless the self-selected speed for rehabilitation, correction of gait and training purposes.     

Effects of prolonged load carriage on angular jerk of frontal and sagittal knee motion

BackgroundDuring training, service members routinely walk with heavy body borne loads for long periods of time. These loads alter knee biomechanics and may produce jerky knee motions that reportedly increase joint loading and risk of musculoskeletal injury. Yet, it is unknown if service members use jerky knee motions during prolong walking with body borne load.Research questionTo quantify the effects of body borne load and duration of walking on the jerkiness of sagittal and frontal plane knee motion.MethodsEighteen participants had angular jerk of knee motion quantified while they walked (1.3 m/s) for 60-min with three body borne loads (0, 15, and 30 kg). Peak and cost of angular jerk for sagittal and frontal plane knee motion was quantified and submitted to a repeated measures linear model to test the main effects and interaction of load (0, 15, and 30 kg) and time (0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min).ResultsBody borne load increased peak and cost of angular jerk for sagittal plane knee motion up to 35 % and 110 %, respectively, and frontal plane knee motion up to 20 % and 51 %, respectively (all p<0.001), while jerk cost of frontal plane knee motion (p=0.001) increased 31 % after walking 45 min.SignificanceBody borne load produced large (between 20 % and 110 %), incremental increases in angular jerk for both sagittal and frontal plane knee motion; whereas, duration of walking led to a 31 % increase in jerkiness of frontal plane knee motion. Service members who often walking for long periods of time with heavy body borne loads may have greater risk of developing musculoskeletal injury and disease due to large increases in jerky knee motions.     

Test–retest reliability and variability of knee adduction moment peak,impulse and loading rate during walking

BackgroundPrevious studies have reported good test-retest reliability for peak knee adduction moment (KAM) during walking. However, reliability of other KAM measurements has not been established.Research questionWhat is the test-retest reliability of peak KAM, KAM impulse, and KAM loading rate measurements during walking in knee-healthy individuals?MethodsData from 32 knee-healthy participants were analysed in this test-retest reliability study. Various KAM measurements were reported for two sessions with kinematic and kinetic data obtained from a motion capture system synchronised with force plates, with a median of 1 week between sessions.ResultsFor all KAM measures, intra-class correlation coefficients were above 0.90 and their lower bound 95 % confidence limits exceeded 0.81. However, absolute measurement variability differed across measures, with normalized SEM (8 %–15 %), normalized MDC₉₅ (20 %–40 %), intra-session MAD (10 %–18 %), and inter-session MAD (12 %–22 %) varying over a 2-fold range. Overall and first peak KAM, KAM impulse over 50 % stance, and KAM loading rate (15 frame window) showed ≤10 % and ≤15 % intra- and inter-session MAD, respectively.SignificanceThis study provided previously undefined test-retest reliability estimates for various KAM measures during walking. Researchers and clinicians should not assume that the various aspects of the KAM curve share similar reliability.     

Trunk flexion during walking in people with knee osteoarthritis

BackgroundOver 50% of the body’s mass is concentrated within the head, arms and trunk. Thus, small deviations in the orientation of the trunk, during normal walking, could influence the position of the centre of mass relative to the lower limb joint centres and impact on lower limb biomechanics. However, there are minimal data available on sagittal kinematics of the trunk in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) during walking.Research questionDo people with knee OA have altered kinematic patterns of the trunk, pelvis or hip compared with healthy control participants during walking?MethodsStatistical parametric mapping was used to compare sagittal and frontal plane kinematic patterns, during walking, between a healthy group and cohort of people with knee OA.ResultsIndividuals with knee OA walked with a mean increase in trunk flexion of 2.6°. Although this difference was more pronounced during early stance, it was maintained across the whole of stance phase. There were no differences, between the groups, in sagittal plane pelvic or hip kinematics. There were also no differences in trunk, pelvic or hip kinematics in the frontal plane.SignificanceMost previous gait research investigating trunk motion in people with knee OA has focused on the frontal plane. However, our data suggest that an increase in sagittal trunk flexion may be a clinical hallmark of people with this disease. Altered trunk flexion could affect joint moments and muscle patterns and therefore our results motivate further research in this area.     

Reductions in knee joint forces with weight loss are attenuated by gait adaptations in class III obesity

A consensus exists that high knee joint forces are a precursor to knee osteoarthritis and weight loss reduces these forces. Because large weight loss also leads to increased step length and walking velocity, knee contact forces may be reduced less than predicted by the magnitude of weight loss. The purpose was to determine the effects of weight loss on knee muscle and joint loads during walking in Class III obese adults. We determined through motion capture, force platform measures and biomechanical modeling the effects of weight loss produced by gastric bypass surgery over one year on knee muscle and joint loads during walking at a standard, controlled velocity and at self-selected walking velocities. Weight loss equaling 412 N or 34% of initial body weight reduced maximum knee compressive force by 824 N or 67% of initial body weight when walking at the controlled velocity. These changes represent a 2:1 reduction in knee force relative to weight loss when walking velocity is constrained to the baseline value. However, behavioral adaptations including increased stride length and walking velocity in the self-selected velocity condition attenuated this effect by ∼50% leading to a 392 N or 32% initial body weight reduction in compressive force in the knee joint. Thus, unconstrained walking elicited approximately 1:1 ratio of reduction in knee force relative to weight loss and is more indicative of walking behavior than the standard velocity condition. In conclusion, massive weight loss produces dramatic reductions in knee forces during walking but when patients stride out and walk faster, these favorable reductions become substantially attenuated.     

Reliability and validity of knee angles and moments in patients with osteoarthritis using a treadmill-based gait analysis system

BackgroundAlthough commonly used to study knee osteoarthritis (OA), relatively little is known about the reliability and validity of three-dimensional (3D) gait biomechanics derived from treadmill-based systems.Research questionUsing a treadmill-based gait analysis system, our objectives were to: 1) estimate the test-retest reliability of frontal and sagittal plane knee angles and moments in knee OA patients; 2) examine concurrent validity by estimating the associations between treadmill-based and overground (gold standard) measures; and 3) examine known-groups validity by comparing measures between knee OA patients and matched healthy controls.Methods34 patients and 16 controls completed 3D gait analyses using treadmill-based and overground systems. Treadmill walking speed was matched to self-selected overground speed. Marker set, knee angle and moment calculations were consistent for both systems. Patients completed a second test session using the treadmill-based system <24 h later but within 1 week of the first test session. Variables calculated from knee angle and moment gait waveforms during stance were evaluated using Bland and Altman plots, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), Pearson correlations (r) and t-tests.ResultsVisual inspection of the Bland and Altman plots did not reveal any systematic differences between test and retest sessions; however, limits of agreement (LoA) were larger for the sagittal plane than the frontal plane. Mean differences between sessions for knee angles were <0.25 degrees and <0.18 %BW*ht for knee moments. ICCs ranged from 0.57-to-0.93 for test-retest reliability. Pearson correlations between treadmill and overground systems ranged from 0.56-to-0.97. Although highly associated, there were substantial differences in the moments, emphasizing they cannot be used interchangeably. Patients had greater first peak knee adduction moments (KAM) than controls [mean difference (95 %CI): 0.55 (−1.07, −0.04), p = 0.03].SignificanceResults suggest frontal and sagittal plane knee angles and moments in patients with knee OA evaluated using a treadmill-based system are reliable and valid.     

Offloading Effects on Impact Forces and Patellofemoral Joint Loading During Running in Females

BackgroundStructure-specific loading is being increasingly recognized as playing a role in running related injuries. The use of interventions targeted at reducing patellofemoral joint loads have shown effectiveness in reducing symptoms of patellofemoral pain. Use of bodyweight support (BWS) has the potential to reduce loading on the patellofemoral joint during running to augment rehabilitation efforts.Research Question:How is patellofemoral joint loading different when using a harness-based BWS system during running?MethodsTwenty-five healthy females free from lower extremity injury were included. Participants completed four running trials on an instrumented treadmill with varying amounts of BWS using a commercially available harness system. Kinematic data from a 3D motion capture system and kinetic data from the treadmill were combined in a computer model to estimate measures of patellofemoral joint loading, knee kinematics, ground reaction force, and stride frequency.ResultsPeak patellofemoral joint stress and time-integral were reduced when running under BWS conditions compared to control conditions. Incremental decreases in patellofemoral loading were not observed with incremental increases in BWS. Peak knee flexion angle was reduced in all BWS conditions compared to control but was not different between BWS conditions. Knee flexion excursion was reduced in only the high BWS condition. Peak ground reaction force and stride frequency incrementally decreased with increased amounts of BWS.SignificanceHarness-based BWS systems may provide a simple means to reduce patellofemoral joint loading to assist in rehabilitation efforts, such as addressing patellofemoral pain.     

Measures of knee and gait function and radiographic severity of knee osteoarthritis – A cross-sectional study

BackgroundPain reports show at most weak to moderate relationship with structural findings of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Less is known about the relationship between measures of knee and gait function and structural findings of knee OA.Research questionTo test the hypothesis that patient-reported, performance-based and three-dimensional knee and gait measures can distinguish between individuals with varying degrees of radiographic knee OA severity.MethodsTo increase the spectrum of radiographic severity baseline data of individuals included in a cohort study and in a randomized controlled trial respectively were included in this cross-sectional study. Individuals completed the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Single Limb Mini Squat (SLMS) test, and three-dimensional gait analysis. Radiographic severity was dichotomized into mild (Kellgren Lawrence (KL) 1-2) or severe (KL 3-4) knee OA. Proxies for medial knee joint loading were peak knee adduction moment (KAM) and KAM impulse, and summary measures of overall gait function were the Gait Deviation Index for kinematics (GDI) and kinetics (GDI-kinetic). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and logistic regressions were used to evaluate whether KOOS-scores, SLMS test, peak KAM, KAM impulse, and GDI-scores could discriminate radiographic severity of knee OA.ResultsThe sample (n = 115) consisted of 60% women, mean age 61 years (SD 8). Good discriminating abilities (AUC > 0.7) were demonstrated for all measures of knee function and gait, except for GDI and GDI-kinetic (0.62 and 0.36, respectively). Odds ratios from logistic regressions largely supported the AUC findings.SignificanceWith the exception of gait summary measures, discriminating abilities were demonstrated by all measures of knee and gait function. Given the interest in interpreting OA as a multi-factorial disease, this information may assist researchers in selecting the most appropriate outcomes for biomechanical studies.     

Asymmetry of the knee extension deficit in standing affects weight-bearing distribution in patients with bilateral end-stage knee osteoarthritis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate weight-bearing distribution in patients with bilateral end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to clarify the gait parameters affecting the weight-bearing distribution during both standing and walking using gait analysis.

Methods

Twenty-five patients (averaged 71 years) with symptomatic bilateral end-stage medial knee OA participated in this study. They performed relaxed standing, placing one foot on a force plate and thereafter, level walking. First, knee resultant force was calculated on bilateral knees during standing. The knees in each patient were divided into Higher and Lower force side for the definition of dominant side limb. Second, gait parameters in each subject were compared between both sides.

Results

Each patient had large weight-bearing asymmetry, though passive range of motion, subjective pain level, femorotibial angle and radiographic disease severities were not significantly different between both sides. In standing, knees on Higher force side were significantly extended (11.2 ± 6.5°) than on Lower force side (14.4 ± 7.3°, P = 0.0086). Similarly, knees on Higher force side were also significantly extended at heel strike during gait. Besides, peak values of extension moment, knee adduction moment, knee adduction moment impulse and vertical force during gait were significantly greater on Higher force side.

Conclusions

Ability to extend the knee in standing was considered to be an essential factor to decide loading condition. It is clinically important to examine the ability to extend the knee in standing when considering loading asymmetry during gait in patients with bilateral knee OA.

Level of evidence

III.     

The relationship between muscle capacity utilization during gait and pain in people with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis

BackgroundMuscle capacity utilization reflects the percentage of maximal knee extensor strength required to complete physical activities.Research questionIs pain associated with muscle capacity utilization during walking in older adults with knee osteoarthritis? Secondarily, is muscle capacity utilization in older adults with knee osteoarthritis sex-specific?MethodsTwenty-three participants (15 females) with symptomatic knee OA completed this study [age 67 ( ± 8) years, body mass index 29.7 ( ± 3.9) kg/m², gait speed during the Six Minute Walk test 1.25 ( ± 0.25) m/s]. Pain was measured using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Muscle capacity utilization was quantified as the peak external knee flexor moment during level walking normalized to knee extensor maximum voluntary isometric contraction. The knee flexor moment was calculated from kinematic and kinetic data during barefoot level walking at a self-selected speed and at 1.1 m/s. Knee extensor maximum voluntary isometric contraction was measured on a dynamometer. Multiple linear regressions were used to determine the relationship between pain and muscle capacity utilization after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and gait speed. Independent sample t-tests examined sex differences.ResultsPain was not associated with muscle capacity utilization during self-selected and standardized walking speeds (p = 0.38 and p = 0.36, respectively). Females did not require a greater muscle capacity utilization than males to complete gait at self-selected and standardized speeds (p = 0.28, and p = 0.40, respectively).SignificanceMuscle capacity utilization was not associated with pain during walking in people with knee osteoarthritis. Future work should explore more challenging activities of daily living in knee OA.