Length of stay,readmission, and mortality after primary surgery for pediatric spinal deformities: a 10-year nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND CONTEXTExtended length of stay (extLOS) and unplanned readmissions after first time pediatric spinal deformity surgery are a considerable challenge to both the patient and the health-care system. To our knowledge, only a limited number of nationwide studies reporting short-term comorbidity with complete follow-up exist.PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to identify the postoperative complications leading to extLOS, readmissions, and mortality within 90 days after surgery. Furthermore, to identify risk factors for readmission.DESIGNRetrospective national cohort study.PATIENT SAMPLEA nationwide registry study including all pediatric spinal deformity patients (≤21 years of age) undergoing primary surgery during 2006–2015 (n=1,310).OUTCOME MEASURESReasons for extLOS and 90-day readmissions as well as mortality risk.METHODSPatients were identified by procedure and diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Data on length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and mortality within 90 days were retrieved from the DNPR. Patients were categorized in six groups according to etiology. Reasons for extLOS and readmission were collected from medical records and discharge summaries.RESULTSFor the 1,310 patients, the median LOS was 8 days (interquartile range 7–9). Etiologies were idiopathic deformity (53%), neuromuscular deformity (23%), congenital/structural deformity (9%), spondylolisthesis (7%), Scheuermann kyphosis (5%), and syndromic deformity (3%). A total of 274 (21%) patients had extLOS and the most common reason was pain/mobilization issues but with considerable variation between etiologies; Scheuermann kyphosis (91%), idiopathic (59%), syndromic (44%), spondylolisthesis (38%), and congenital (30%). Pulmonary complications were the primary reason for extLOS in the neuromuscular group (22%). The 90-day readmission rate was 6%; 67% of readmissions were medical, mainly infections unrelated to the surgical site (23%); 33% of readmissions were surgical and 14% of patients required revision surgery. Neuromuscular deformity, spondylolisthesis, Scheuermann kyphosis, and LOS >9 days were independent risk factors for readmission; odds ratio (OR) 4.4 (95% confidence interval: 2.2–9.1, p<.01), OR 3.0 (1.1–8.0, p=.03), OR 4.9 (1.7–13.6, p<.01), and OR 1.8 (1.0–3.1, p=.04), respectively. The 90-day mortality risk was 0.4%.CONCLUSIONSIn this nationwide cohort, pain/mobilization issues are the most common reason for extLOS. The most common reason for readmission is infection unrelated to the surgical site. Readmission after pediatric spinal surgery is related to the etiology and increased focus on patients operated for neuromuscular deformity, spondylolisthesis and Scheuermann kyphosis is warranted.     

Unexpected intraoperative positive culture (UIPC) in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXTUnexpected intraoperative positive culture (UIPC) has recently become increasingly common in revision spine surgery, being implicated as an etiological factor in revision spine surgery indications such as implant failure or pseudoarthrosis.PURPOSEUtilizing the available literature, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of UIPC, and its clinical importance in patients following presumed aseptic revision spine surgery.STUDY DESIGNMeta-analysis and systematic review.METHODSMultiple databases and reference articles were searched until May 2022. The primary outcome was the pooled rate of UIPC, and the secondary outcomes were the microbiological profile of UIPC, the risk factors of UIPC, and the clinical fate of UIPC.RESULTSTwelve studies were eligible for meta-analysis, with a total of 1,108 patients. The pooled rate of UIPC was 24.3% (95% CI=15.8%–35.5%) in adult patients, and 43.2% (95% CI=32.9%–54.2%) in pediatric patients. The UIPC rate was higher when both conventional wound culture and sonication were used together compared to sonication alone or conventional wound culture alone. The rates were 28.9%, 23.6%, and 15.5 %, respectively. In adult and pediatric patients, the most commonly cultured organism was Cutibacterium acnes (42.5% vs 57.7%), followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (39.9% vs 30.5%). Male patients had a higher rate of UIPC (OR= 2.6, 95% CI=1.84–3.72, p<.001), as did patients with a longer fusion construct (MD=0.76, 95% CI=0.27–1.25, p<.001).CONCLUSIONSThe pooled rate of UIPC in aseptic spine revision surgery was 24.3% and 43.2% in adult and pediatric patients respectively. The most common organisms were C. acnes and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. The impact of UIPC on patients` clinical outcomes is not fully understood. We are not able to recommend routine culture in revision spine surgery, however, adding sonication may aid in the diagnosis of UIPC. There is not enough evidence to recommend specific treatment strategies at this time, and further studies are warranted.     

Surgical treatment of metastatic spine disease: an update on national trends and clinical outcomes from 2010 to 2014

BACKGROUND CONTEXTMetastatic spine disease (MSD) is becoming more prevalent as medical treatment for cancers advance and extend survival. More MSD patients are treated surgically to maintain neurological function, ambulation, and quality of life.PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to use a large, nationally representative database to examine the trends, patient outcomes, and health-care resource utilization associated with surgical treatment of MSD.DESIGNThis was an epidemiologic study using national administrative data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD).PATIENT SAMPLEAll patients in the NRD from 2010 to 2014 who underwent spinal surgery were included in the study.OUTCOME MEASURESMortality, blood transfusion, complications, length of stay, cost, and discharge location during index hospitalization as well as hospital readmission and revision surgery within 90-days of surgery were analyzed.METHODSInternational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, (ICD-9) codes was used to identify patients of interest within the NRD from 2010 to 2014. Patients were separated into two cohorts – those with MSD and those without. Trends for surgical treatment of MSD were assessed and outcomes measures for both cohorts were analyzed and compared.RESULTSThe number of surgical treatments for MSD increased from 6,007 in 2010 to 7,032 in 2014 (p-trend<.0001) which represented a 17.1% increase. During index hospitalization, MSD patients had an increased risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR]=3.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.85–3.63, p<.0001), blood transfusion (OR=2.93, 95% CI: 2.66–3.23, p<.0001), any complication (OR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.18–1.31, p<.0001), and discharge to skilled nursing facility (OR=1.51, 95% CI:1.41–1.61, p<.0001). MSD patients had longer average length of stay (13.05 vs. 4.56 days, p<.0001) and cost ($49,421.75 vs. $26,190.37, p<.0001) during index hospitalization. Furthermore, MSD patients had an increased risk of hospital readmission (OR=2.82, 95% CI: 2.68–2.96, p<.0001), readmission for surgical site infection (OR=2.38, 95% CI: 2.20–2.58, p<.0001), and readmission with neurologic deficits (OR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.27–2.06, p<.0001) despite a decreased risk of revision fusion (OR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.53–0.96, p=.026).CONCLUSIONSThe number of MSD patients who undergo surgical treatments is increasing. Not only do these patients have worse outcomes during index hospitalization, but they are also at an increased risk of hospital readmission for surgical site infection and neurologic complications. These findings stress the need for multidisciplinary perioperative treatment plans that mitigate risks and facilitate quick, effective recovery in these unique, at-risk patients.     

General vs Spinal Anesthesia for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Do Complication Rates Differ?

BackgroundThe incidence of both primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and revision TKA is increasing. Data from primary arthroplasty patients suggest a risk reduction with the use of spinal anesthesia when compared with general anesthesia. However, the same relationship has not been examined in the revision knee arthroplasty patient.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement database. Patients undergoing revision TKA with either spinal or general anesthesia were identified from the database. Baseline characteristics were compared, and ultimately patients were matched using coarsened exact matching. Multivariate analysis was then performed on matched cohorts controlling for baseline patient and operative characteristics. This model was used to look for any differences in rates of complications, operative time, length of stay, and readmission.ResultsPatients undergoing revision TKA with general anesthesia had increased risk of several postoperative complications, even after controlling for baseline patient characteristics. Specifically, there were significantly increased rates of the following: unplanned readmission (OR = 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18-1.72, P < .001), nonhome discharge (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.46-1.76, P < .001), transfusion (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.41-1.88, P < .001), deep surgical site infection (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.01-2.03, P = .043), and extended length of stay (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.11-1.34, P < .001). General anesthesia was additionally associated with increased operative time.ConclusionGeneral anesthesia is associated with increased risk of numerous postoperative complications in patients undergoing revision TKA. This study is retrospective in nature, and while causality cannot be definitively determined, the results suggest that spinal anesthesia is preferential to general anesthesia in the revision TKA patient.     

Surgical site infection is a major risk factor of pseudarthrosis in adult spinal deformity surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXTDespite the evidence in appendicular skeletal surgery, the effect of infection on spinal fusion remains unclear, particularly after Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) surgery.PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to determine the impact of surgical site infection (SSI) in ASD surgery fusion rates and its association with other risks factors of pseudarthrosis.STUDY DESIGNWe conducted an international multicenter retrospective study on a prospective cohort of patients operated for spinal deformity.PATIENT SAMPLEA total of 956 patients were included (762 females and 194 males).OUTCOME MEASURESPatient's preoperative characteristics, pre and postoperative spinopelvic parameters, surgical variables, postoperative complications and were recorded. Surgical site infections were asserted in case of clinical signs associated with positive surgical samples. Each case was treated with surgical reintervention for debridement and irrigation. Presence of pseudarthrosis was defined by the association of clinical symptoms and radiological signs of nonfusion (either direct evidence on CT-scan or indirect radiographic clues such as screw loosening, rod breakage, screw pull out or loss of correction). Each iterative surgical intervention was collected.METHODSUnivariate and multivariate analysis with logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the role of risk factors of pseudarthrosis.RESULTSNine hundred fifty-six surgical ASD patients with more than two years of follow-up were included in the study. 65 of these patients were treated for SSI (6.8%), 138 for pseudarthrosis (14.4%), and 28 patients for both SSI and pseudarthrosis.On multivariate analysis, SSI was found to be a major risk factor of pseudarthrosis (OR=4.4; 95% CI=2.4,7.9) as well as other known risks factors: BMI (OR=1.1; 95% CI=1.0,1.1), smoking (OR=1.6; 95% CI=1.1,2.9), performance of Smith-Petersen osteotomy (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.0,2.6), number of vertebrae instrumented (OR=1.1; 95% CI=1.1,1.2) and the caudal level of fusion, with a distal exponential increment of the risk (OR max for S1=6, 95% CI=1.9,18.6).CONCLUSIONSSI significantly increases the risk of pseudarthrosis with an OR of 4.4.     

Risk factors for postoperative bleeding in bariatric surgery

BackgroundPostoperative bleeding remains a relatively common complication following bariatric surgery and may lead to morbidity and even mortality.ObjectiveTo develop a prediction model to identify patients at risk for postoperative bleeding.SettingRode Kruis Ziekenhuis, Beverwijk, the Netherlands. Based on Dutch nationwide obesity audit data.MethodsPatients undergoing primary bariatric surgery were selected from January 2015 to December 2020 from the Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity. The primary outcome was postoperative bleeding within 30 days. Assessed predictors included patient factors and operative data. A prediction model was developed using backward stepwise logistic regression. Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping techniques.ResultsA total of 59,055 patients were included; 13,399 underwent a sleeve gastrectomy, and 45,656 underwent a gastric bypass procedure. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 1.5%. The following predictors were identified: male patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21–1.63), patients >45 years of age (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.29–1.76), body mass index <40 kg/m² (OR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.06–1.41), cardiovascular disease (OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.17–1.57), and sleeve gastrectomy (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.24–1.67). Area under the curve for the model was .612. Following bootstrapping for internal validation, a correction of .9817 was applied.ConclusionA clinical decision rule was designed to assess the risk of postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. If 3 or more risk factors are present, there is an increased risk for postoperative bleeding. The model can aid in clinical decision-making: implementing extra preventative measures in high-risk patients. External validation is needed to further develop the model.     

Measuring malnutrition and its impact on pediatric surgery outcomes: A NSQIP-P analysis

BackgroundThere is a limited understanding of the impact of pediatric malnutrition indicators on post-operative outcomes.Materials and methodsAll pediatric surgical patients captured in the ACS NSQIP-Pediatric database from 2016 to 2018 were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds of 30-day post-operative infection by malnutrition definition (stunted, wasted, requiring nutritional support, pre-operative hypoalbuminemia).ResultsAmong pediatric surgery patients (n = 282,056), 19% of patients met one definition of malnutrition, 6% met two, 1% met 3, and < 0.1% met all 4. After adjustment, requiring nutritional support (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.36–1.60), stunting (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.10–1.25), and hypoalbuminemia (OR 1.17 95% CI 1.04–1.32) were associated with increased odds of post-operative infection while wasting was not. Requiring nutritional support was associated in an increase of 10.17 days (95% CI 9.89–10.44) in time from admission to surgery.ConclusionsThe metric used to define malnutrition changed the association with post-operative outcomes. Nutritional supplementation, stunting, and hypoalbuminemia were associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. These findings have implications for pre-operative patient level counseling, accurate risk stratification, surgical planning, and patient optimization in pediatric surgery.Level of EvidenceIII.     

Are preoperative depression and anxiety associated with patient-reported outcomes,health care payments,and opioid use after anterior discectomy and fusion?

BACKGROUND CONTEXTDepression and anxiety are common psychiatric conditions among US adults, and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most commonly performed spinal surgeries. Mental health conditions can affect physical health, and thus have the potential to contribute to adverse outcomes after spine surgery; however, a comprehensive assessment of long-term outcomes and the additive economic burden of these conditions in patients undergoing ACDF has not been well described.PURPOSEOur goal was to assess the associations between depression/anxiety and adverse outcomes and health-resource utilization after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).STUDY DESIGNRetrospective database study.PATIENT SAMPLEWe retrospectively analyzed a private administrative health claims database to identify patients who underwent ACDF in the United States from 2010 to 2013. A total of 16,306 patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean (± standard deviation) patient age was 50±7.9 years. Approximately 4,800 patients (30%) had a depression diagnosis and 4,000 (25%) had a diagnosis of anxiety.OUTCOME MEASURESThe primary outcomes of interest were intensive care unit admission, multiday hospitalization, discharge disposition, 30- and 90-day hospital readmission, 1- and 2-year rates of revision surgery, and chronic postoperative opioid use. Secondary outcomes were 1- and 2-year total cumulative health care payments and cumulative postoperative opioid consumption.METHODSRegression models controlled for demographic and medical covariates, alpha=0.05.RESULTSA preoperative diagnosis of depression was associated with higher odds of multiday hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.19), 90-day readmission (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.46–2.02), revision surgery within 2 years (OR 1.43 95% CI 1.16–1.76), and chronic postoperative opioid use (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.45–1.72) and an increase of $5,915 in adjusted 2-year health care payments (p<.001). Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of anxiety had higher odds of multiday hospitalization (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06–1.25), revision surgery within 2 years (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07–1.65), and chronic postoperative opioid use (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.48–1.77) and an increase of $4,471 in adjusted 2-year health care payments (p<.001). Neither anxiety nor depression was associated with intensive care unit admission, discharge disposition, 30-day readmission, revision surgery within 1 year, 1-year cumulative health care payments, or cumulative postoperative opioid consumption.CONCLUSIONSPatients with preoperative diagnoses of depression or anxiety have a greater likelihood of adverse outcomes, increased opioid consumption, and increased cumulative health care payments after ACDF compared with patients without depression or anxiety.     

Risk factors for early-onset radiographical adjacent segment disease in patients with spondylolytic spondylolisthesis after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXTThe risk factors for radiographical adjacent segment disease (ASD) in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis have been previously reported. However, there are only few reports on patients with spondylolytic spondylolisthesis who underwent single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).PURPOSEThe study aimed to investigate the risk factors for radiographical ASD in patients with L5–S1 spondylolytic spondylolisthesis who underwent single-level PLIF.STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGA retrospective studyPATIENT SAMPLEThis study retrospectively reviewed 135 consecutive patients (91 men and 44 women) with symptomatic L5–S1 spondylolytic spondylolisthesis who underwent single-level PLIF.OUTCOME MEASURESThe pre- and postoperative (at the final follow-up) spinopelvic parameters, % slip, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence (PI), PI minus LL (PI ? LL), lumbosacral angle, C7 sagittal vertical axis, and thoracic kyphosis were measured using standing radiographs.METHODSRadiographical ASD was defined as disc height loss (>3 mm), increase of posterior angulation (>5°), or progression of spondylolisthesis (>3 mm) between the pre- and postoperative radiographs. Pfirrmann's classification was used to evaluate disc degeneration. The radiographical parameters and changes between the pre- and postoperative values were evaluated and compared for the non-ASD and ASD groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the adjusted associations between each potential explanatory variable and ASD development.RESULTSThe radiographical ASD incidence was 11%. Additionally, 60% of the patients with ASD had radiographical ASD at 1 year and all cases of radiographical ASD in this follow-up period occurred within 3 years after the initial surgery. The mean period of ASD occurrence after initial surgery was 21.7 ± 12.6 months. No patients required reoperation for radiographical ASD. Multivariate analysis revealed that a preoperative (odds ratio [OR], 5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–28.9; p=.03) and a postoperative (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.2–34.5; p=.03) PI ? LL of ≥15° were risk factors for radiographical ASD.CONCLUSIONSPre- and postoperative PI ? LL value mismatch was identified as significant independent risk factors for radiographical ASD in patients with L5–S1 spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Obtaining larger lordosis at L5–S1 may be the key to preventing radiographical ASD.     

How Do Complications Within the First 30 days after Spinal Deformity Surgery in Children with Cerebral Palsy Affect Length of Stay?

BackgroundSurgery for spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy is reported to have high perioperative complication rates. However, minor complications are not generally reported and the influence of the varied severity of complications on length of stay is not known. Understanding the risk factors for both minor and major perioperative complications and their effect on length of stay is important information for clinicians who seek to improve care for this group of children.Questions/purposes(1) What is the prevalence of postoperative complications in the first 30 days after surgery for spinal deformity in a New Zealand national cohort of children with cerebral palsy using the Clavien-Dindo classification? (2) What are the patient and operative predictive risk factors for minor and major perioperative complications? (3) What is the effect of year of operation on risk of minor and major perioperative complications? (4) What is the effect of perioperative complications on length of stay?MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study, identifying all children in New Zealand with a confirmed diagnosis of cerebral palsy who had surgery for a spinal deformity from January 1997 to January 2018. Two hundred-three patients with cerebral palsy (102 boys) were surgically treated for a spinal deformity, at a mean age of 14 ± 3 years, at one of three centers in New Zealand. Six children had Gross Motor Function Classification System Level II or III, 66 had Gross Motor Function Classification System Level IV, and 131 had Gross Motor Function Classification System Level V. Thirty-day perioperative complications were extracted from the patients’ health records and classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify patient and operative risk factors for complications, and the effect on length of stay.ResultsIn all, 85% of patients experienced at least one perioperative complication. There were 300 Clavien-Dindo Grade I complications in 141 patients, 156 Clavien-Dindo Grade II complications in 102 patients, 25 Clavien-Dindo Grade III complications in 22 patients, 29 Clavien-Dindo Grade IV complications in 28 patients, and one Clavien-Dindo Grade V complication (death; 0.5%). Univariate analysis showed that multiple independent factors, Gross Motor Function Classification System Level V ability (odds ratio 2.13 [95% confidence interval 1.15 to 3.95]; p = 0.02), seizure disorder (OR 2.27 [95% CI 1.20 to 4.32]; p < 0.01), preoperative Cobb angle of greater than 70° (OR 2.40 [95% CI 1.20 to 4.78]; p < 0.01), and anterior approach to surgery (OR 3.29 [95% CI 1.21 to 8.90]; p = 0.02), were associated with Grade I complications but, of these factors, only the presence of a seizure disorder (OR 2.27 [95% CI 1.20 to 4.32]; p < 0.01) was associated with Grade I complications on multivariate analysis. Previous recurrent respiratory infections predicted an increased risk of Clavien-Dindo Grade II complications (OR 3.6 [95% CI 1.81 to 7.0]; p = 0.03). The presence of a feeding gastrostomy was associated with an increased risk of Clavien-Dindo Grade IV complications (OR 2.6 [95% CI 1.19 to 5.87]; p = 0.02). The year of operation did not influence the frequency of any grade of complication, but the presence of any complication led to an increased length of stay.ConclusionOverall, 85% of patients with cerebral palsy had at least one complication after spinal deformity surgery and 25% had major complications (Grades III, IV, and V), with proportionate increases in the postoperative length of stay. Patient-specific factors aid in the identification of complication risk.Level of EvidenceLevel II, prognostic study.     

The performance of frailty in predictive modeling of short-term outcomes in the surgical management of metastatic tumors to the spine

BACKGROUND CONTEXTThe concept of frailty has become increasingly recognized, and while patients with cancer are at increased risk for frailty, its influence on perioperative outcomes in metastatic spine tumors is uncertain. Furthermore, the impact of frailty can be confounded by comorbidities or metastatic disease burden.PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of frailty and comorbidities on adverse outcomes in the surgical management of metastatic spine disease.STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective analysis of a nationwide database to include patients undergoing spinal fusion for metastatic spine disease.PATIENT SAMPLEA total of 1,974 frail patients who received spinal fusion with spinal metastasis, and 1,975 propensity score matched non-frail patients.OUTCOME MEASURESOutcomes analyzed included mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), nonroutine discharges and costs.METHODSA validated binary frailty index (Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups) was used to identify frail and non-frail groups, and propensity score-matched analysis (including demographics, comorbidities, surgical and tumor characteristics) was performed. Sub-group analysis of levels involved was performed for cervical, thoracic, lumbar and junctional spine. Multivariable-regression techniques were used to develop predictive models for outcomes using frailty and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI).RESULTS7,772 patients underwent spinal fusion with spinal metastasis, of which 1,974 (25.4%) patients were identified as frail. Following propensity score matching for frail (n=1,974) and not-frail (n=1,975) groups, frailty demonstrated significantly greater medical complications (OR=1.58; 95% CI 1.33–1.86), surgical complications (OR=1.46; 95% CI 1.15–1.85), LOS (OR=2.65; 95% CI 2.09–3.37), nonroutine discharges (OR=1.79; 95% CI 1.46–2.20) and costs (OR=1.68; 95% CI 1.32–2.14). Differences in mortality were only observed in subgroup analysis and were greater in frail junctional and lumbar spine subgroups. Models using ECI alone (AUC=0.636-0.788) demonstrated greater predictive ability compared to those using frailty alone (AUC=0.633–0.752). However, frailty combined with ECI improved the prediction of increased LOS (AUC=0.811), cost (AUC=0.768), medical complications (AUC=0.723) and nonroutine discharges (AUC=0.718). Predictive modeling of frailty in subgroups demonstrated the greatest performance for mortality (AUC=0.750) in the lumbar spine, otherwise performed similarly for LOS, costs, complications, and discharge across subgroups.CONCLUSIONSA high prevalence of frailty existed in the current patient cohort. Frailty contributed to worse short-term adverse outcomes and could be more influential in the lumbar and junctional spine due to higher risk of deconditioning in the postoperative period. Predictions for short term outcomes can be improved by adding frailty to comorbidity indices, suggesting a more comprehensive preoperative risk stratification should include frailty.     

Patient Characteristics Influence Revision Rate of Total Hip Arthroplasty: American Society of Anesthesiologists Score and Body Mass Index Were the Strongest Predictors for Short-Term Revision After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundOutcome and survival after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be affected by patient characteristics. We examined the effect of case-mix on revision after primary THA using the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.MethodsOur cohort included all primary THAs (n = 218,214) performed in patients with osteoarthritis in the Netherlands between 2007 and 2018. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the difference in survivorship in patients with different patient characteristics (age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score, body mass index [BMI], Charnley score, smoking, and previous operations to the hip).ResultsCase-mix factors associated with an increased risk for revision 1 year after THA were the following: a high ASA score (II and III-IV) (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.0 and OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.7-5.3), a higher BMI (30-40 and >40) (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.5 and OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-1.7), age ≥75 years (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.0), and male gender (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4). A similar model for 3-year revision showed comparable results. High BMI (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.9), a previous hip operation (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.5), ASA III-IV (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1-1.6), and Charnley score C (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.2) were associated with increased risk for revision. Main reasons for revision in obese and ASA II-IV patients were infection, dislocation, and periprosthetic fracture. Patients with femoral neck fracture and late post-traumatic pathology were more likely to be revised within 3 years, compared to osteoarthritis patients (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.7 and OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.7).ConclusionThe short-term risk for revision after primary THA is influenced by case-mix factors. ASA score and BMI (especially >40) were the strongest predictors for 1-year revision after primary THA. After 3 years, BMI and previous hip surgery were independent risk factors for revision. This will help surgeons to identify and counsel high-risk patients and take appropriate preventive measures.     

Effect of Parkinson’s Disease on Hemiarthroplasty Outcomes After Femoral Neck Fractures

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes following hemiarthroplasty (HA) for femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) compared with patients without PD.MethodsThis was a retrospective review utilizing the Nationwide Readmissions Database, a national database incorporating inpatient hospitalization information. Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, patients who underwent HA for FNF between 2010-2014 were identified. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, codes were used to find a subset of patients with PD. Primary outcomes of interest included death, hospital readmission, periprosthetic fracture, postoperative dislocation, any revision surgery, and revision surgery for instability, fracture, or infection.ResultsThere were a total of 7721 (4%) patients with PD. There was no difference in the risk of death or any postoperative complications during index hospitalization for these patients. However, PD patients had an increased risk of hospital readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.26) and postoperative dislocation (OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.58-2.80) within 90 days of surgery. PD patients also had an increased risk of revision surgery for instability (OR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.48-3.28), despite no difference in the risk of any revision surgery, revision surgery for fracture, or revision surgery for infection.ConclusionIn this retrospective cohort study, PD patients who underwent a HA for FNF had a greater risk of postoperative dislocation and revision surgery for instability within 90 days. These findings are not only important to consider when managing these at-risk patients but also stress the need to allocate operative and postoperative resources to prevent and treat instability.Level of Evidence3 (Retrospective cohort study).     

Exploring perioperative complications of anterior lumber interbody fusion in patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND CONTEXTAnterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) exposes the anterior aspect of the spine through a retroperitoneal approach. Access to the anterior spine requires mobilization of intra-abdominal viscera/vasculature, which can become complicated as scarring and/or adhesions develop from prior abdominal surgical interventions, increasing risk of intraoperative complications. The literature suggests that “significant prior abdominal surgery” is a relative contraindication of ALIF surgery; however, there is no consensus within the literature as to what defines “major/significant” abdominal surgeries. Additionally, the association between the number of prior abdominal surgeries and perioperative complications in ALIF surgery has not been explored within the literature.PURPOSEThis study seeks to explore the association between perioperative complications of ALIF surgery and the type (major and/or minor) and number of prior abdominal surgeries.DESIGNA retrospective cohort study was performed to examine perioperative complications in ALIF patients with or without prior history of abdominal surgery.PATIENT SAMPLEAll consecutive patients undergoing ALIF with or without a history of prior abdominal surgery from 2008 to 2018 at a single tertiary center were evaluated. Patients under the age of 18, patients with spinal malignancy, or patients who had ALIF above L3 were excluded.OUTCOME MEASURESPerioperative complications included intraoperative complications during ALIF surgery and postoperative complications within 90 days of ALIF surgery. Intraoperative complications include vascular injury, ureter injury, retroperitoneal hematoma, etc. Postoperative complications include urinary tract infection, revision of abdominal scar, ileus, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, etc. Other outcome measures include readmission within 90 days, length of ALIF surgery, and length of hospital stay.METHODSElectronic medical records of 660 patients who underwent ALIF between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI), level of fusion, past abdominal surgical history, use of access surgeon during exposure, intraoperative, and postoperative complications were collected. Predictors of intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed using simple and multivariable logistic regression. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP 14.0 (SAS, Cary, NC, USA) software.RESULTSAfter controlling for age, length of ALIF, gender, multilevel ALIF, and the use of an access surgeon, there was no significant association between the type of prior abdominal surgery (major and/or minor) and intraoperative complications on multivariable logistic regression analysis (Minor: odds ratio [OR]=1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58–4.86 & Major: OR=1.99; 95% CI: 0.80–4.91). On multivariable logistic regression, the odds of developing an intraoperative complication increases by 52% for each additional prior abdominal surgery after adjusting for age, length of ALIF, gender, multilevel ALIF, and the use of an access surgeon (OR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.10–2.11). Iliac vein laceration was the most common intraoperative complication (n=27, 4%). Neither the type (major and/or minor) nor the number of prior abdominal surgeries were significant predictors of postoperative complications (Minor: OR=1.29; 95% CI: .72–2.31, Major: OR=1.24; 95% CI: 0.77–2.00, & Number: OR=1.03; 95% CI: .84–1.26).CONCLUSIONWith each additional prior abdominal surgery, accumulation of scarring and adhesions can likely obscure anatomical landmarks and increase the risk of developing an intraoperative complication. Therefore, the number of prior abdominal surgeries should be taken into consideration during planning and operative exposure of the anterior spine via a retroperitoneal approach.     

Prospective analysis of adverse events in surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis

Background contextSurgical adverse event (AE) monitoring is imprecise, of uncertain validity, and tends toward underreporting. Reports focus on specific procedures rather than outcomes in the context of presenting diagnosis. Specific intraoperative (intraop) or postoperative (postop) AEs that may be independently associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) have never been reported.PurposeThe primary purpose was to assess the AE profile of surgically treated patients with L4–L5 DS. The secondary goal was to identify potential risk factors that correlate with those AEs.Study design/settingProspective cohort and academic quaternary spine center.Patient sampleNinety-two patients with L4–L5 DS were treated surgically, discharged from Vancouver General Hospital between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010.Outcome measuresIncidence rates and odds ratios.MethodsProspective AE data were analyzed using univariate analyses, forward selection regression models, and Spearman correlation coefficients. Results were compared with outcomes reported in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.ResultsNo AEs were seen in 57.6% of patients, one AE in 17.4%, and two or more AEs in 17.4%. Dural tears (6.5%) and intraop bone-implant interface failure requiring revision (3.3%) were the most common intraop AEs. Postoperatively, the most frequent AEs were urinary tract infection (10.9%), delirium (5.4%), neuropathic pain (4.4%), deep wound infection (3.3%), and superficial wound infection (3.3%). The odds of an intraop AE increased by 9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1–18) per year of age at admission. Adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) did not correlate with number of AEs experienced. The odds of postop delirium correlated with CCI (odds ratio [OR] 3.39, 95% CI 1.12–10.24) and dural tear (OR 35.84, 95% CI 1.72–747.45). Length of stay was statistically significant and was influenced by two or more AEs, CCI, postop loss of correction, cerebrospinal fluid leak, deep wound infection, noninfected wound drainage, and gender.ConclusionsRisk of intraop AEs, but not postop AEs, increased with increasing age. Having multiple comorbidities does not predispose to more AEs. Infections predominate among the postop AEs. Patients at increased risk of delirium or of having an increased length of hospital stay may more easily be predicted. Studies specifically designed to prospectively assess AEs have the potential to more accurately identify postop AE rates.     

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Are There Differences in Complication and Readmission Rates?

BackgroundSpinal anesthesia (SP) utilization continues to expand in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, little is known regarding differences in complication rates between spinal and general anesthesia used for primary TKA. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the length of stay (LOS), operative time, and readmission and revision rates between patients who received spinal and general anesthesia during TKA.MethodsThe American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) was used to identify primary elective TKA patients from 2017 to 2020. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, general (GN) and SP, based on the mode of anesthesia administered during the index surgery. In total, 270,251 TKAs were identified, of which 126,970 (47.0%) received general anesthesia and 143,281 (53.0%) received spinal anesthesia. Length of stay, operative time, 90-day readmission, and 90-day revisions were compared between the 2 groups. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for potential confounders.ResultsAfter accounting for confounding factors, SP was associated with a lower risk of having a LOS greater than 3 days (odds ratio [OR] 0.470, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.454-0.487, P < .0001), but a slightly higher likelihood of having a longer operative time (OR 1.075, 95% CI 1.056-1.094, P < .0001). SP was also linked to lower rates of 90-day readmission (OR 0.845, 95% CI 0.790-0.904, P < .0001) and lower risk of 90-day all-cause revision (OR 0.506, 95% CI 0.462-0.555, P < .0001).ConclusionSP was associated with a lower 90-day readmission rate and a lower risk of 90-day revision. These findings support the best practice guidelines of The Joint Commission to use spinal anesthesia when possible as part of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.     

Etiology-Based Classification of Adjacent Segment Disease Following Lumbar Spine Fusion

Background

Adjacent segment disease (ASDz) is a potential complication following lumbar spinal fusion. A common nomenclature based on etiology and ASDz type does not exist and is needed to assist with clinical prognostication, decision making, and management.

Questions/Purposes

The objective of this study was to develop an etiology-based classification system for ASDz following lumbar fusion.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 65 consecutive patients who had undergone both a lumbar fusion performed by a single surgeon and a subsequent procedure for ASDz. We established an etiology-based classification system for lumbar ASDz with the following six categories: “degenerative” (degenerative disc disease or spondylosis), “neurologic” (disc herniation, stenosis), “instability” (spondylolisthesis, rotatory subluxation), “deformity” (scoliosis, kyphosis), “complex” (fracture, infection), or “combined.” Based on this scheme, we determined the rate of ASDz in each etiologic category.

Results

Of the 65 patients, 27 (41.5%) underwent surgery for neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy for adjacent-level stenosis or disc herniation and were classified as “neurologic.” Ten patients (15.4%) had progressive degenerative disc pathology at the adjacent level and were classified as “degenerative.” Ten patients (15.4%) had spondylolisthesis or instability and were classified as “instability,” and three patients (4.6%) required revision surgery for adjacent-level kyphosis or scoliosis and were classified as “deformity.” Fifteen patients (23.1%) had multiple diagnoses that included a combination of categories and were classified as “combined.”

Conclusion

This is the first study to propose an etiology-based classification scheme of ASDz following lumbar spine fusion. This simple classification system may allow for the grouping and standardization of patients with similar pathologies and thus for more specific pre-operative diagnoses, personalized treatments, and improved outcome analyses.

     

Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention following elective spine surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXTLimited studies have investigated risk factors for postoperative urinary retention (POUR) following elective spine surgery. Furthermore, some discrepancies have been found in the results of existing observational studies.PURPOSEThis study aimed to review the available literature on risk factors associated with POUR following elective spine surgery.STUDY DESIGNA systematic review with meta-analysis was performed.PATIENT SAMPLEA total of 31,251 patients (POUR=2,858, no POUR=28,393) were included in the meta-analysis.OUTCOME MEASURESDemographics, type of elective spine surgery, country, definition of POUR, and potential risk factors for POUR were evaluated.METHODSThe Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Binary outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR). Weighted mean differences (WMD) or standardized mean differences (SMD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were used for meta-analysis of continuous outcomes.RESULTSEleven studies (2 prospective and 9 retrospective) were included in the analysis. Patients with POUR were older than those without POUR (WMD, 7.13; 95% CI, 4.50–9.76). Male patients were found to have an increased risk of POUR (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04–1.64). The following variables were also identified as significant risk factors for POUR: benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; OR, 3.79; 95% CI, 1.89–7.62), diabetes mellitus (DM; OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.17–1.93), and previous urinary tract infection (UTI; OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.28–2.24). Moreover, longer operative time (WMD, 19.88; 95% CI, 5.01–34.75) and increased intraoperative fluid support (SMD, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23–0.52) were observed in patients with POUR. In contrast, spine surgical procedures involving fewer levels (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65–0.86), and ambulation on the same day as surgery (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52–0.81) were associated with a decreased risk of POUR.CONCLUSIONSBased on our meta-analysis, older age, male gender, BPH, DM, and a history of UTI are risk factors for POUR following elective spine surgery. We also found that longer operative time and increased intravenous fluid support would increase the risk of POUR. Additionally, multi-level spine surgery may have a negative effect on postoperative voiding.     

The complication trends of pediatric spinal deformity surgery in Japan – The Japanese Scoliosis Society Morbidity and Mortality survey from 2012 to 2017

BackgroundThe Japanese Scoliosis Society Morbidity & Mortality Committee performed a longitudinal nationwide complication survey of spinal deformity surgery from 2012 to 2017. The present study aimed to analyze the survey results and report the complication trends of pediatric spinal deformity surgery in Japan.MethodsAll Japanese Scoliosis Society members were invited to participate in the survey. Diagnoses were grouped into idiopathic scoliosis, congenital scoliosis, neuromuscular scoliosis, other types of scoliosis, and pediatric kyphosis. Complications were grouped into death, blindness, neurological deficits (motor/sensory), infection, massive bleeding, hematoma, pneumonia, cardiac failure, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, gastrointestinal perforation, and instrumentation failure.ResultsThe surveys were performed in 2012, 2014, and 2017. The overall complication rate decreased from 10.7% in 2012 to 8.1% in 2017. In particular, the complication rate in patients with idiopathic scoliosis decreased from 8.8% in 2012 to 4.0% in 2017. The complication rate of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis and kyphosis remained high. The rate of neurological deficits, especially in motor deficits, significantly decreased from 2.0% in 2012 to 0.7% in 2017, and tended to be highest in patients with kyphosis. The rate of massive bleeding was significantly decreased from 3.3% in 2012 to 0.8% in 2017, especially in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis (12.2–4.4%). However, patients with neuromuscular scoliosis had a high rate of postoperative pneumonia (3.7%, 2.6%, and 5.1%, respectively). The rate of instrumentation failure was also high (2.1%, 1.5%, and 2.2%, respectively), especially in patients with early onset idiopathic, congenital and other types of scoliosis.ConclusionsThe overall surgical complication rates in pediatric patients decreased due to decreased rates of neurological deficits and massive bleeding, especially in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. However, the complication rates remain high in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis and kyphosis.     

Independent predictors and timing of portomesenteric vein thrombosis after bariatric surgery

BackgroundPortomesenteric vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare complication following bariatric surgery but can result in severe morbidity as well as death.ObjectiveIdentification of risk factors for PVT to facilitate targeted management strategies to reduce incidence.SettingProspective, statewide bariatric-specific clinical registry.MethodsWe identified all patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery between June 2006 and November 2021 (n = 102,869). Patient characteristics, procedure type, operative details, and 30-day postoperative complications were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression to evaluate for independent predictors of PVT.ResultsA total of 117 patients (.11%) developed a postoperative PVT, with 6 (5.1%) associated deaths. The majority of PVTs occurred in patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (109 patients; 93.2%), and the PVT occurred most commonly during the second (37%), third (31%), and fourth weeks (23%) after surgery. Independent risk factors for PVT included a prior history of venous thromboembolism (odds ratio [OR] = 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64–5.98; P = .0005), liver disorder (OR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.36–4.00; P = .0021), undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (OR = 12.4; 95% CI: 4.98–30.69; P < .0001), and postoperative complications including obstruction (OR = 12.5; 95% CI: 4.65–33.77; P < .0001), leak (OR = 7.9; 95% CI: 2.76–22.64; P = .0001), and hemorrhage (OR = 7.6; 95% CI: 3.57–16.06; P < .0001).ConclusionsIndependent predictors of PVT include a prior history of venous thromboembolism, liver disease, undergoing sleeve gastrectomy, and experiencing a serious postoperative complication. Given that the incidence of PVT is most common within the first month after surgery, extending postdischarge chemoprophylaxis during this time frame is advised for patients with increased risk.