Long-Term Antitachycardia Pacing Experience for Supraventricular Tachycardia

A pacemaker was used to control drug-resistant reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 40 patients. An antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in 37 for SVT; in one for ventricular tachycardia that could also be used to terminate SVT; in one SVT could be terminated with an activity rate variable pacemaker; and in one a DDD pacemaker was used for prevention and termination of SVT. Twenty patients had AV nodal reentrant tachycardias, eight had tachycardias due to a concealed accessory pathway, eight had a Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, three had reentrant atrial tachycardias, and one had atrial flutter. Twenty-two patients were paced from the right atrium, five from the coronary sinus, ten from the right ventricle, and three had a DDD pacemaker. During a total follow-up period of 1,503 (mean 38) months an estimated 16,240 episodes of tachycardia were terminated promptly at home, 58 required several attempts, 57 episodes lasted longer than 30 minutes but did not require medical attention, and 11 required hospital admission. Hospital admission for SVT decreased from one per patient-month (in the 3 months before implantation) to 1 per 137 patient-months after implantation. Additional reentrant tachycardias occurred in 13 patients. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in combination with a conservative antitachycardia pacing mode was required in four patients paced from the atrium to avoid pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy was used in 42% of patients to help control SVT. Conclusions: (1) Drug-resistant SVTs can be safely and effectively managed on the long-term with antitachycardia pacemakers. (2) Rapid termination of SVT improved the quality-of-life significantly by avoiding prolonged episodes of tachycardia and repetitive hospital admissions.     

Clinical Experience with a New Software-Based Antitachycardia Pacemaker for Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardias

The Intermedics Intertach 262-12 tachycardia reversion pulse generator was implanted in 14 patients (six male, eight female, mean age at implantation 45 +/- 16 years) with recurrent symptomatic tachycardias. Six patients had atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia, three patients had orthodromic tachycardia with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, two had circus movement tachycardia via a concealed bypass tract, two had ventricular tachycardia, one patient had atrial flutter. Mean duration of symptoms before implantation was 8 +/- 4 years and mean number of antiarrhythmic drug trials was 3.5 +/- 1. The primary tachycardia response made consisted of autodecremental pacing in one patient, burst pacing in two patients, and adaptive scanning of the initial delay or burst cycle length in eleven patients. The secondary tachycardia response mode consisted of autodecremental pacing in four patients, burst pacing in three patients and burst scanning in four patients. Tachycardia response was automatic in all but one patient with ventricular tachycardia. During a follow-up period of 30.5 +/- 10.6 months, one patient with ventricular tachycardia died from a nonarrhythmic cause. Reinterventions were necessary due to electrode fracture in one patient and due to pacemaker software defect in another one. Two patients underwent surgical cure of their arrhythmia: one patient with atrial flutter and one patient with AV nodal reentry tachycardia, 24 months and 11 months postpacemaker implantation, respectively. Four patients required digitalis to prevent pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Other proarrhythmic effects were not encountered. The pacemaker proved to be a versatile system with reliable tachycardia detection and termination functions. It provided a valuable adjunctive therapy in these selected patients.     

Clinical Experience with the Intertach 262-12 Pulse Generator in Patients with Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardia

FROMER, M., ET AL.: Clinical Experience with the Intertach 262-12 Pulse Generator in Patients with Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardia. An antitachycardia pulse generator, the Intermedics Intertach 262-12 was implanted in 16 patients (14 patients with supraventricular tachycardia of various origins and two patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia), who were not responsive to various antiarrhythmic drug regimens. The follow-up was from 6–49 months (mean 30.9 ± 13.8). Five patients had a follow-up of over 3 years. The device was used in all patients. One patient with ventricular tachycardia died from a nonarrhythmic cause. Loss of responsiveness to burst pacing was observed in 1/14 patients with supraventricular tachycardia and nontolerance of antitachycardia pacing in one patient. Overall clinical success of pacing was observed in 13/16 patients = 81%. The pacemaker proved to be a versatile system with reliable tachycardia detection and termination functions.     

Long-Term Therapy of Antitachycardia Pacing for Supraventricular Tachycardia

Long-term antitachycardia pacing therapy with the InterTach 262-12 and 262-16 was evaluated in 32 consecutive patients (mean age 50 +/- 13 years) with recurrent, drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia. AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was present in 20 patients, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in ten patients, and a reentrant tachycardia due to Mahaim fibers in one patient. During follow-up of 39 +/- 17 months, 250 persistent tachycardia episodes occurred in 22 patients. By adjusting detection and termination mode, recurrent supraventricular tachycardia could be controlled in 19 of 32 patients (60%) by antitachycardia pacing alone. Concomitant antiarrhythmic drug therapy was required in ten of 32 patients (30%). During follow-up antitachycardia pacing became ineffective in three patients (10%). Thus, chronic antitachycardia pacing proved to be safe and effective in selected patients with drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia and could significantly improve quality of life by rapid termination of recurrent supraventricular tachycardia episodes.     

Benefits and Potential Risks of Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing After Repair of Congenital Heart Disease

Atrial reentry tachycardia is common after surgical repair of congenital heart disease. The arrhythmia is often difficult to treat and is occasionally life-threatening. This study reports experience with atrial antitachycardia (AAIT mode) pacing for the management of atrial reentry tachycardia, with emphasis on the risks and benefits of automatic pacing therapy. Eighteen patients (2–32 years of age) with a variety of congenital heart lesions underwent atrial antitachycardia pacemaker placement for recurrent atrial tachycardia that was amenable to pace termination prior to the implantation procedure. An appropriate antitachycardia program was determined by repeated induction and termination of atrial tachycardia using the noninvasive programmed stimulation mode of the pacemaker. Over 4–30 months of follow-up, 6 patients had 189 episodes of tachycardia successfully converted with AAI-T pacing, 4 patients had 8 episodes of tachycardia detected hut not successfully converted, and 8 patients had no episodes of tachycardia with antibradycardia pacing alone. The number of patients receiving pharmacological therapy other than digoxin or beta blockade fell from 12 to 6, Two subjects died suddenly, 1 while wearing a Holter monitor. In both, tachycardia was detected and pace cardioversion attempted. Conclusions: Atrial antitachyardia pacing is a useful tool in the management of patients with congenital heart disease and atrial arrhythmias; however, in selected cases, it may not prevent and may even exacerbate the lethal complications of the tachycardia. Antitachycardia function evaluation is recommended under varying levels of autonomic stress prior to institution of automatic therapy.     

Significance of Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients with Implanted Pacing Cardioverter Defibrillators

Eighty-six patients were treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) because of sustained ventricalar tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). In 27 patients an epicardial system was used, in 59 patients a transvenous system with a subcutaneous patch electrode was implanted. During a mean follow-up time of 17 ± 9 months, inappropriate activations of the ICD due to supraventricular tachycardia were documented by Holter monitoring in 14 patients (16%). In 8 patients paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), in 2 patients chronic AF, in 1 patient atrial flutter, and in 3 patients sinus tachycardia triggered antitachycardia pacing functions (12 patients) or internal defibrillation (2 patients). In 3 patients (5%) VT was induced by inappropriate antitachycardia pacing. In an additional 18 patients (21%) inappropriate activation of antitachycardia functions due to atrial tachyarrhythmias were suspected based on telemetry readouts or the patient's history. Inappropriate activation of ICD therapy triggered by intermittent supraventricular tachyarrhythmias is common. Further improvements of detection algorithms for supraventricular tachycardia are required in future device generations.     

Comparison of Two Antitachycardia Pacing Modes in Supraventricular Tachycardia

The comparative efficacy of two different antitachycardia pacing techniques was evaluated in 22 consecutive patients who received the pacemaker Intertach® with an atrial electrode for drug refractory, recurrent Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The Intertach® has two consecutive programmable primary and secondary termination modes. The termination programs investigated were adaptive autodecremental burst pacing and adaptive decremental scanning. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was present in 15 patients and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia due to Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in seven patients. The prospective comparison was arranged in a randomized, cross-over study over a period of 12 months. To assess long-term efficacy, diagnostic data of the pacemakers were obtained in intervals of 3 months. In addition, noninvasive programmed stimulation was performed to compare the incidence of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation with both termination programs. During a follow-up of 12 months the overall success rate of autodecremental burst pacing and decremental scanning was 80% and 95%, respectively. Decremental scanning was more effective in 12 patients and less successful in two patients than autodecremental burst pacing. During noninvasive electrophysiological studies, pacing induced atrial fibrillation could be documented in three often patients (30%) using autodecremental burst pacing, compared to one often patients (10%) using decremental scanning. These data suggest that decremental scanning proved to be more successful in the long-term management of patients with recurrent S VT than autodecremental burst pacing. Furthermore, the occurrence of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation could be documented more frequently with autodecremental burst pacing compared to decremental scanning.     

Problems of Sensing Tachyarrhythmias by an Antitachycardia Pacemaker (Symbios 7008)

Atrial burst pacing is an effective method of terminating supraventricular tachycardia. In the patient presented in this report, a Symbios 7008 pacemaker (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was implanted for two reasons: (1) severe AV conduction defect (AH, 230 msec; HV, 150 msec) and bifascicular block following anterior myocardial infarction; and (2) paroxysmal atrial flutter. The conduction defect ruled out programming other than atrial burst in DDD mode. Activation of burst pacing required appropriate programming of the "tachycardia detection window" on the basis of the cycle length of the flutter waves. In the case reviewed, episodes of atrial flutter with variable cycle lengths of 230 to 280 msec necessitated reprogramming of the AV interval, the refractory period, and the upper rate interval. The use of an antitachycardia device in automatic mode may be limited by variations in tachycardia cycle length.     

Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker

MCCOMB, J.M., ET AL.: Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker. During a 3-year period, 22 patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia have been treated with antitachycardia pacemakers [Intermedics Intertach, 262–12, n = 17, and Intertach II, 262–16, n = 5). Eighty-two percent were female, the mean age was 44 ± 14 years; 86% had atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Symptoms had occurred over 11.8 ± 7.1 years, with 3.6 hospital admissions per patient, despite 4.7 ± 2.1 antiarrhythmic drugs. Following pacemaker implantation, during a follow-up of 14.8 ± 11.5 months, only two patients have been readmitted to a hospital because of supraventricular tachycardia (mean 0.1 per patient). One patient is taking an antiarrhythmic agent, and four are taking beta adrenergic blocking agents. Thus, 23% are taking cardioactive drugs (it was anticipated that two patients would continue on drugs after pacemaker implantation). There have been no serious complications. Atrial antitachycardia is thus an effective therapy in carefully selected patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia, reducing hospital admissions for supraventricular tachycardia and reducing the need for antiarrhythmic drugs.     

Permanent Antitachycardia Pacemaker Therapy for Ventricular Tachycardia

This article describes our experience with an antitachycardia pacemaker alone (N = 3) or in combination with an automatic implontoble cardioverter defibrillator (AICD, N = 8) in the treatment of ventricular tochycardia. EJeven patients (mean ejection fraction 31%, mean oge 67 years) received an antitachycardia pacemaker. Nine had their units programmed for automatic antitachycardia pacing, one unit was programmed to automatic antitachycardia pacing by magnet activation only, and one to tachycardia detection and bradycardia support. Of the nine patients with automatic antitachycardia pacing, seven received appropriate and successful pace termination of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia at up to 120 times per month. Eight of these nine have had AICD implantations as well. There were no operative complications. Over a mean (± SD) follow-up of 12.1 ± 9.3 months (range 3–29 months), there have been two deaths, both due to heart failure. There have been four AICD discharges in three patients. Two units discharged in a clinically appropriate setting. The other two units, both with rate cutoffs <200 beats/min, were inadvertently triggered by the antitachycardia pacemaker and/or the underlying rate. In addition to the careful selection of the defibrillator rate cutoff, adverse device-device interactions were avoided by careful intraoperative lead positioning, and the disabling of bradycardia pacing when not needed or contraindicated. Antitachycardia pacing, with the safety provided by the AICD, is an effective treatment for patients with medically refractory ventricular tachycardia.     

Holter Documented Sudden Death in a Patient with an Implanted Defibrillator

A 68-year-old man with recurrent attacks of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) received a pacer cardioverter defibrillator featuring antitachycardia pacing and cardioversion/defibrillation. Over 300 episodes of VT were successfully terminated by antitachycardia pacing. During Holter monitoring the patient experienced supraventricular tachycardia with delivery of multiple antitachycardia pacing, cardioversion, and defibrillation therapies ending with the death of the patient. The following factors played a role in the unfortunate outcome of this patient: 1. triggering of VT therapy by an unexpected high sinus rate; 2. atrial fibrillation induced by cardioversion therapy; 3. a gradual and continuous increase in rate during atrial fibrillation possibly caused by repeated VT and ventricular fibrillation therapies and/or by a thrombus, found at autopsy, in a bypass graft; and 4. the limited ability of presently available defibrillators to distinguish between ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias.     

Pacing for tachydysrhythmias

Advances in cardiac electrophysiology have clarified some of the mechanisms of tachydysrhythmias and have characterized tachycardias that are amenable to pace termination. Tachydysrhythmias most likely to be terminated by pacing techniques tend to be slow, re-entrant tachycardias. Although single extrastimulation can be effective, its yield is relatively low. Delivery of multiple extrastimuli or burst pacing are more effective than single extrastimulation at the expense of a higher risk of tachycardia acceleration or transformation of the rhythm to fibrillation. The use of pacing for the termination of tachydysrhythmias has primarily been limited to the acute care setting, although permanently implantable antitachycardia pacemakers are being used in increasing numbers. While these devices have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of supraventricular tachydysrhythmias, their use to treat ventricular tachydysrhythmias has produced mixed results and remains investigational. In some cases of sustained ventricular tachycardia, automatic cardioverter/defibrillators have been implanted along with antitachycardia pacemakers to provide high-energy shock back-up in case of tachycardia acceleration by the pacemaker. Soon, devices will be available which will combine, in a single unit, antitachycardia pacing and high-energy cardioversion/defibrillation.     

Limitations to Activation of the Antitachycardia Burst Pacing Function of the Symbios 7008 Pacemaker in the Universal (DDD) Mode

The Symbios 7008 antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in five patients for control of supraventricular tachycardia. Shortly after implantation in the first two patients, it was noted that the burst pacing sequence was not automatically activated by tachycardia when the pacemaker was in the DDD mode. Data from these two and the subsequent three patients were evaluated to explain this observation. The problem was primarily related to the operation of the device during the postventricular atrial refractory period. In all patients, the atrial electrogram encroached upon the programmed postventricular atrial refractory period because VA conduction during SVT was less than the lowest programmable interval (155 ms). Atrial events occurring during this interval will not trigger the tachycardia termination sequence. In all five patients, the size of the atrial electrogram decreased substantially (48 +/- 10%; mean +/- SD) during supraventricular tachycardia compared to sinus rhythm. In at least two of the five patients, decreased atrial size during supraventricular tachycardia may also have resulted in intermittent failure of atrial sensing during tachycardia, even at the most sensitive setting (0.6 mV). The latter may remain a problem even if the technical fault in SVT detection in the DDD mode were corrected. Two related problems were noted in the DDD mode: ventricular events during rapid SVT do not reset the low rate interval, resulting in random low rate pacing; and, automatic prolongation of atrial refractory period by two successive ventricular events without an intervening atrial sensed event compounds problems of atrial sensing. All of these problems were easily circumvented in all patients by noninvasive reprogramming to the DVI mode in which supraventricular tachycardia detection is based on ventricular sensing. These findings have implications for the future design of such devices.     

Device Interaction—Antitachycardia Pacemakers and Defibrillators for Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

We evaluated the combined use of permanent automatic antitachycardia pacemakers and implanted defibrillators in fen patients with recurrent monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Pacemaker programming was VVI-T automatic burst in eight patients, VVI-T magnet mode in one patient, and VVI in one patient. Device interactions occurred in four patients, requiring changes in pacemaker programming. These included defibrillator multiple counting during pacing, in-appropriate pacemaker bursts initiating VT, inappropriate reset of the pacemaker antitachycardia mode by defibrillation, defibrillator discharge after pacemaker VT termination, and defibrillator VT reinitiation. Two patients required pacemaker programming out of the antitachycardia mode, and two required a change in antitachycardia pacing parameters. Seven patients remain in automatic VVI-T and three in VVI modes. Mean follow-up is 13 months and all patients are alive. Thus, although pacemaker/ defibrillafor combinations function well for patients with more than one VT rate, device interactions occur frequently and may require pacemaker reprogramming or elimination of the overdrive mode. Combined use of these devices should be cautiously considered when single device therapy is unsatisfactory. Devices that combine both pacing and defibrillation features may reduce adverse interaction.     

Chronic Rapid Atrial Pacing to Maintain Atrial Fibrillation: Use to Permit Control of Ventricular Rate in Order to Treat Tachycardia Induced Cardiomyopathy

LR was a patient, followed over a 16-year period, who presented with an atrial tachycardia which was initially intermittent, but became incessant. Neither the atrial tachycardia nor the associated rapid ventricular response rate could be treated successfully with available drug therapy, resulting in a dilated cardiomyopathy and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV congestive heart failure. Acute induction of atrial fibrillation with rapid atrial pacing demonstrated that the associated ventricular rate could be satisfactorily slowed with digitalis therapy. Initially, short bursts from an implanted, radiofrequency controlled, patient activated pacemaker programmed to a rate of 600 bpm and connected to a permanent endocardial atrial J lead successfully interrupted the tachycardia and precipitated atrial fibrillation. Over a period of 3 months, this therapy changed the patient's heart failure to NYHA class II status. Subsequently, precipitation of atrial fibrillation with this technique failed, resulting in return to NYHA class III-IV congestive heart failure. Therefore, a custom-designed, high rate, rate-programmable pacemaker was implanted to pace the atria rapidly and continuously to maintain atrial fibrillation. A pacing rate of 375 bpm plus digoxin slowed the ventricular rate to 70-80 bpm, with stabilization of the congestive heart failure to NYHA class II. The pacemaker generator was replaced 6 months later, and after another 5 months, pacing was discontinued. The patient's subsequent rhythm remained stable atrial fibrillation with clinically successful control of both the ventricular rate and heart failure (NYHA class II) until the patient's death 72 months later. This unique case demonstrates another form of chronic therapy which, in selected cases, can be used for the long term control of rapid ventricular response rates to supraventricular arrhythmia.     

Clinical Interest of a Sensor Driven Algorithm Limiting Ventricular Pacing Rate During Supraventricular Tachycardia in Dual Chamber Pacing

A sensor driven algorithm limiting ventricular pacing rate during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is included in a dual chamber rate modulated pacemaker sensitive to acceleration forces (Relay, 294-03, Intermedics Inc.). According to the intensity of concomitant exercise, the ventricular pacing rate is limited either to the programmed maximum pacing rate (MPR) or to an interim lower limit, called "conditional ventricular tracking limit" (CVTL). The MPR prevails over the CVTL when the sensor calculated pacing rate exceeds the minimal rate by more than 20 beats/mm. The purpose of the study is to determine the clinical safety and efficacy of this algorithm in patients with intermittent SVT. Method: a Relay was implanted in four patients with a bradycardia/tachycardia syndrome and in four patients with complete atrioventricular block (CAVB). All had episodes of paroxysmal atrial tachycardia. The units were programmed in DDDR: rate responsive parameters were adjusted by simulating the rate response during three levels of exercise to let the MPR override the CVTL only during strenuous exercise. Holter monitors and exercise testings were performed at 3-month follow-up. Results: in seven patients, Holter recordings showed Supraventricular arrhythmias at rest with a ventricular pacing rate limited to the CVTL. Appropriate rate increases during exercise testings were also demonstrated. Three devices had to be reprogrammed in DDIR tone patient suffering from nearly permanent atrial flutter and two patients not tolerating the CVTL pacing rate at rest). Conclusion: the CVTL algorithm is effective in protecting against high ventricular pacing rates during Supraventricular arrhythmias. It allows the selection of the DDDR mode even with a high MPR in patients with intermittent SVT.     

Programmable External Automatic Antitachycardia Pacing as a Bridge to Definitive Therapy in Patients with Recurrent Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

The efficacy and safety of external programmable automatic antitachycardia pacemakers (ATPs) used in the critical care setting for recurrent sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was evaluated. Ten patients who had failed a mean of 4.0 +/- 1.4 antiarrhythmic medications (range 2-7) and who had previously required electrical cardioversion for VT were enrolled. Prior to ATP use, successful overdrive pacing termination of VT was demonstrated in all patients. Intertach (Intermedics, Inc.; n = 9) and Orthocor II (Cordis, Inc.; n = 1) ATPs were attached to temporary bipolar transvenous or epicardial pacing leads. Mean patient age was 66.4 +/- 11.5 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 22 +/- 7.5%. At the time of initial ATP use, mean VT cycle length was 347 +/- 88 msec (range 280-550 msec). A burst scanning antitachycardia pacing algorithm was used in each patient; one patient was also treated with a fixed rate burst adapted to VT cycle length. The duration of ATP use ranged from 2-25 days (median 5), successfully terminating greater than 3,369 VT episodes (median 3, range 0 to greater than 3,103 episodes per-patient). Two episodes of ATP induced rate acceleration occurred, each successfully terminated by the ATP. Only two patients required external cardioversion during ATP use, one for primary ventricular fibrillation and one for rapid polymorphic VT associated with antiarrhythmic drug withdrawal. ATPs also provided antibradycardia pacing and allowed for serial programmed ventricular stimulation. No complications were associated with transvenous catheter or ATP use.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A Single Atrial Extrastimulus Can Distinguish Sinus Tachycardia from 1:1 Paroxysmal Tachycardia

We have developed a tachycardia detection scheme for use in an antitachycardia pacemaker in which the use of a properly timed atrial extrastimulus provides a means of discriminating sinus tachycardia from pace-terminable 1:1 tachycardias. An atrial extrastimulus is delivered in late diastole (80 ms premature), and the ventricular response is monitored. In sinus tachycardia, the ventricular response is expected to appear early as well, but in pace-terminable tachycardias, such as AV reentrant and ventricular with VA conduction, the ventricular rhythm will be unperturbed. Testing of the algorithm was performed in 34 patients. In 29 patients, atrial extrastimuli were delivered during sinus tachycardia, and in 22 patients during various types of 1:1 paroxysmal tachycardia. In one patient the procedure was completely automated, i.e., delivery of the atrial extrastimuli and diagnosis were microcomputer controlled. In 28/29 cases, the delivery of an atrial extrastimulus 80 to 120 ms early during sinus tachycardia elicited a ventricular response at least 28 ms early. In 22/22 patients with 1:1 paroxysmal tachycardia, atrial extrastimuli 80 to 120 ms early failed to produce a significant change in ventricular cycle length. This technique appears to be promising for prevention of inadvertent pacing of sinus tachycardia in an antitachycardia pacemaker.     

Long-term results of permanent atrioventricular sequential demand pacing.

Pervenous atrioventricular sequential demand pacemakers (AVSDPs) were implanted in 18 patients using an atrial electrode positioned in the right atrial appendage and a ventricular electrode positioned at the apex of the right ventricle. The indications included 13 patients with the sick sinus syndrome (72%), five of whom had the tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome, three with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, one with cardiomyopathy and one with carotid sinus syncope. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 38 months, with a mean of 19.4 months (a total of 350 pacing months). Seventeen patients (94%) are asymptomatic. One patient had persistent episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. In the remaining patients with tachyarrhythmia, pacing alone (three patients) or in combination with antiarrhythmic drugs (four patients) controlled the tachyarrhythmia. There was one displacement of the atrial electrode (5.5%). Extrusion of the pacer occurred in three patients. It is concluded from this experience that AV sequential pacing is an effective technique and may be useful in patients with sick sinus syndrome, in patients with tachyarrhythmia and/or patients with poor myocardial function. However, continued research is needed to prolong battery life and to reduce the size of the pacemaker.