Bivalirudin, blood loss, and graft patency in coronary artery bypass surgery

A safe and effective alternative is needed for patients in whom unfractionated heparin (UFH) or protamine is contraindicated (e.g., those with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or allergy to protamine). Furthermore, choice of anticoagulant may influence graft patency in coronary surgery and may therefore be important even when there is no contraindication to UFH. Direct thrombin inhibitors have several potential advantages over UFH, demonstrated in acute coronary syndromes. However, there are also potential difficulties with their use related to lack of reversal agents and paucity of clinical experience in monitoring their anticoagulant activity at the levels required for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In the first prospective randomized trial of an alternative to heparin in cardiac surgery, we compared bivalirudin (a short-acting direct thrombin inhibitor) with UFH in 100 patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. Blood loss for the 12 hours following study drug initiation in the bivalirudin group was not significantly greater than in the heparin group. Median graft flow was significantly higher in the bivalirudin group. We concluded that anticoagulation for OPCAB surgery with bivalirudin was feasible without a clinically important increase in perioperative blood loss. A larger study is needed to investigate the impact of improved graft patency on other clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery.     

Bivalirudin for anticoagulation in mechanical aortic valve replacement and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially serious syndrome. Since there are some alternatives to treatment with heparin in patients who develop HIT, the decision as to which to use should be based on renal and hepatic function, drug availability and the available monitoring resources. We report a patient who received heparin for mechanical aortic valve replacement. Her clinical course was complicated by HIT, which was treated initially by danaparoid. The syndrome progressed with new thrombotic complications, and eventually was treated successfully by bivalirudin (Angiomax; Medison Pharma Ltd, Petach Tikva, Israel) for 9 days. We propose that treatment with bivalirudin for several days is a safe and effective alternative to heparin therapy in patients who develop HIT.     

Percutaneous interventions in patients with immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

The use of unfractionated heparin, the traditional antithrombotic agent during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), is associated with the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, a rare but often fatal clinical condition. This article focuses on several issues related to heparin-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia (HIT, type II) and alternative modes of periprocedural anticoagulation in patients with suspected or known HIT. The hypercoagulable state characterizing HIT, along with mechanical plaque disruption resulting from PCI place patients with HIT at particular risk of thrombosis during PCI. Given that a diagnosis of HIT precludes any further use of heparin, other treatment modalities are essential. Direct thrombin inhibitors are the drugs of choice in this challenging situation. These agents offer several advantages as anticoagulants for patients with HIT: (1) the ability to inhibit both thrombin that is bound to fibrin (clot-bound thrombin) and fluid-phase free thrombin; (2) rapid achievement of steady state; and (3) no cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies. Recent data on the use of bivalirudin, lepirudin, and argatroban in the setting of PCI in patients with HIT are encouraging. Optimal dosing regimens for argatroban, lepirudin, and bivalirudin should be further established in PCI patients.     

Successful use of fondaparinux in a patient with a mechanical heart valve replacement and a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

The development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated clinicopathologic syndrome. The resultant thrombocytopenia and thrombosis can be severe and life-threatening. Fondaparinux is a parenteral factor Xa inhibitor used for venous thromboembolism prevention and treatment. Fondaparinux has minimal affinity for platelet factor 4, making it an alternative agent to unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and a plausible consideration for patients with a history of HIT. The use of fondaparinux in patients with mechanical heart valve replacement and a history of HIT has never been discussed in the literature. We report on the case of a patient with a mechanical aortic heart valve replacement and a history of HIT who was successfully bridged postoperatively with fondaparinux. While there is currently no literature to support the use of fondaparinux in patients with mechanical heart valves, this drug may offer an option for management of such patients who cannot use heparin products. However, further clinical investigations are warranted to confirm both the safety and efficacy of this agent in the mechanical heart valve population.     

The use of direct thrombin inhibitors in cardiovascular surgery in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

One of the most important adverse drug reactions that physicians encounter is the life- and limb-threatening prothrombotic syndrome known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Unfractionated heparin (UFH), administered during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), is highly immunogenic. Heparin-dependent antibodies can develop in 25 to 50% of UFH-treated cardiac surgery patients within 5 to 10 days. These antibodies can activate platelets and are considered the causative agents of HIT. HIT is a relatively common complication, occurring in 1 to 3% of cardiovascular surgery patients when UFH administration is continued postoperatively. It is strongly associated with new thromboembolic events leading to limb amputation and death. In acute or recent (< 100 days) HIT, alternative anticoagulatory regimens are needed during CPB surgery for prevention of HIT-related thrombosis. Treatment options for such patients now generally include the use of alternative anticoagulants such as lepirudin, bivalirudin, or danaparoid, as well as a combined treatment with platelet-function inhibitors and heparin. In patients with a history of HIT and no detectable antibodies, heparin is currently the safest approach for high-dose anticoagulation during CPB. Before and after surgery, however, alternative anticoagulants should be used. The risk of clinical HIT after heart surgery could potentially be reduced by using low-molecular-weight heparins for postsurgery anticoagulation.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Opinion statement Treatment with heparin is associated with two types of thrombocytopenia. The most worrisome of these is the immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT type II). Suspicion of HIT type II mandates immediate cessation of heparin adminis-tration and consideration of an alternative anticoagulation therapy. Hirudin and argatroban are approved alternative anticoagulants with no cross-reactivity with the HIT antibody. HIT type II is a clinicopathologic syndrome, and therefore diagnosis requires clinical and laboratory confirmation. The laboratory evaluation for HIT type II should also determine whether or not there is HIT-antibody cross-reactivity with danaparoid and low molecular weight heparin. Patients with HIT type II who require coronary artery bypass graft surgery present a particularly difficult situation, as there is no ideal alternative to heparin anticoagulation.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the emergency department

We describe 3 patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with stroke, deep venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism and renal failure after undergoing cardiac surgery 7 to 17 days earlier. Their onset of thrombosis after previous heparin exposure was temporally plausible for complications of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an immune-mediated thrombotic disorder triggered by heparin. The patients had normal platelet counts at presentation, yet each had circulating heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies that were ultimately confirmed. Two patients had heparin reexposure in the ED, 1 of whom developed thrombocytopenia with new thrombosis and died. Alternative parenteral anticoagulation prevented further thrombosis in 2 patients. Because heparin use can be catastrophic in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, physicians should be vigilant in suspecting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with thrombosis after recent hospitalization or heparin exposure. Alternative anticoagulants are available for these at-risk patients.     

Frozen Elephant Trunk Repair for Descending Thoracic Aortic Dissection in a Man with a Hostile Left Pleural Cavity

The frozen elephant trunk procedure is a hybrid, single-staged alternative to conventional surgery for repairing diffuse pathologic conditions of the thoracic aorta. This approach is particularly advantageous in patients who have pathologic conditions of the left side of the chest, because the descending thoracic aorta can be repaired without entering a hostile pleural cavity.We present the case of a 67-year-old man who had undergone repair of acute type A aortic dissection. He presented with aneurysmal dilation of the descending thoracic aorta secondary to chronic dissection, a large acute dissection of the proximal ascending aorta, and a large paraesophageal hernia that made him a poor candidate for conventional, 2-staged open aortic repair. We describe the hybrid frozen elephant trunk technique that we used to repair the aorta, and its broader advantages.     

Use of systemic bivalirudin with catheter‐directed thrombolysis in a patient with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: A case report

In patients with submassive pulmonary embolism, the use of catheter‐directed thrombolysis (CDT), using low‐dose alteplase is associated with improvement in overall hemodynamics. The data for use of CDT in patients with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia are limited. We report a case of CDT in a patient with HIT using bivalirudin anticoagulation. Data of the use of bivalirudin and argatroban for systemic anticoagulation with CDT are limited.     

Successful Coronary Interventions Performed with Argatroban Anticoagulation in Patients with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis Syndrome

Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis syndrome (HITTS) frequently have coincident vascular disease. Patients with HITTS who require vascular procedures have often been excluded from vascular intervention because intravascular procedures require heparin. Re-exposure to heparin places these patients at great risk for reactivation of thrombosis related to HIT antibody. We present our initial experience with an alternative anticoagulant to heparin, argatroban in patients with HIT antibody who underwent 14 coronary interventions. All 14 coronary lesions were treated successfully and no patient suffered an HITTS-related or an argatroban-related complication.     

Intraoperative anticoagulation management during cardiac transplantation for a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and a left ventricular assist device

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an immunologically mediated syndrome that is associated with potentially life-threatening arterial and venous thrombosis. Re-exposing patients who have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia to heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass may be hazardous. We describe the re-exposure to unfractionated heparin of a patient with a left ventricular assist device and evidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who needed cardiac transplantation, which was accomplished without complications.     

Current agents for the treatment of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Several counterintuitive treatment paradoxes complicate the management of immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). For example, simple discontinuation of heparin often fails to prevent subsequent HIT-associated thrombosis. Thus, current treatment guidelines recommend substituting heparin with a rapidly acting alternative anticoagulant (eg, danaparoid, lepirudin, or argatroban) even when HIT is suspected on the basis of thrombocytopenia alone ("isolated HIT"). Another paradox-coumarin (warfarin) anticoagulation-can lead to venous limb gangrene in a patient with HIT-associated deep-vein thrombosis. Thus, warfarin is not recommended during acute thrombocytopenia secondary to HIT. However, warfarin can be given as overlapping therapy with an alternative anticoagulant, provided that (1) initiation of warfarin is delayed until substantial platelet count recovery has occurred (to at least above 100 x 10(9)/L); (2) low initial doses of warfarin are used; (3) at least 5 days of overlapping therapy are given; and (4) the alternative agent is maintained until the platelet count has normalized. It has recently been recognized that HIT antibodies are transient and usually do not recur upon subsequent re-exposure to heparin. This leads to a further paradox-patients with previous HIT can be considered for a brief re-exposure to heparin under exceptional circumstances; for example, heart surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass, if HIT antibodies are no longer detectable using sensitive assays. For patients with acute or recent HIT who require urgent heart surgery, other approaches include use of alternative anticoagulants (eg, lepirudin or danaparoid) for cardiopulmonary bypass or antiplatelet agents (eg, tirofiban or epoprostenol) to permit intraoperative use of heparin.     

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia resulting from preceding exposure to heparin catheter flushes

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening adverse effect of heparin. It can result from any type of heparin exposure and by any route of administration; however only a few cases are reported after exposures to small quantities of heparin from catheter flushes. The major clinical problem associated with HIT is thrombosis. Early detection and institution of alternative, non-heparin anticoagulation are important. We report a patient with HIT associated with use of therapeutic-dose unfractionated heparin in whom immune sensitization to heparin was triggered by two 500-unit exposure to UFH associated with intravascular catheter flushing for antineoplastic chemotherapy in a patient with colon adenocarcinoma.     

Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a syndrome in which thrombocytopenia and thrombosis begin several days after heparin discontinuation. Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is caused by immunoglobulin G antibodies that are reactive against the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex in the absence of circulating heparin. We describe 2 patients with delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who presented to the emergency department. An 88-year-old man and a 62-year-old man experienced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis 9 or more days after heparin cessation and demonstrated a further decrease in platelet count on reexposure to heparin. Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia should be included in the differential diagnosis of a patient with recent heparin exposure who presents with thrombosis or thrombocytopenia.     

Unfractionated heparin compared with low-molecular-weight heparin as related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a severe side effect of treatment with unfractionated heparin. The relation of low-molecular-weight heparin to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is less well understood. This review will summarize what is known about the similarities and differences between thrombocytopenia induced by low-molecular-weight heparin and that induced by unfractionated heparin. RECENT FINDINGS: The pathophysiology of unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, caused by the development of antibodies to heparin/platelet factor 4 complexes, holds true for low-molecular-weight heparin because the molecules of the latter are of the same saccharidic structure as those of unfractionated heparin. Owing to their smaller size, however, low-molecular-weight heparin does not interact with platelet factor 4 and platelets as efficiently as does unfractionated heparin. This translates to a two- to threefold lower risk of immune sensitization (antibody generation and occurrence of clinical heparin-induced thrombocytopenia). Low-molecular-weight heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies are more often immunoglobulin A and immunoglobulin M, in contrast to the immunoglobulin G antibodies generated with unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, which tend to be more often associated with clinical heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The clinical expression of low-molecular-weight heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is generally similar to that of unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia but can have a slower onset, more severe thrombocytopenia, and slower platelet count recovery. Given that low-molecular-weight heparin, of itself, is linked with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia pathophysiology and it can interact with most preexisting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies generated after exposure to unfractionated heparin, treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patients with low-molecular-weight heparin is contraindicated. SUMMARY: The risk of the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with low-molecular-weight heparin treatment is reduced relative to the frequency of unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, but it is not eliminated, and platelet counts should be monitored with treatment.     

Lethal heparin-associated pulmonary embolism--case reports

Thrombocytopenia is a known adverse reaction occurring in some patients receiving heparin. Two different types of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have been described. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type I is a mild thrombocytopenia after 1 to 4 days of heparin therapy, attributed to a direct interaction between heparin and circulating platelets. No specific treatment is necessary. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II is a severe thrombocytopenia mediated by an immunologic mechanism. Type II generally develops after 5 to 10 days of heparin therapy and can be associated with potentially devastating thromboembolic complications. The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II is below 3%. Thromboembolic events are always accompanied by a decrease in the platelet count, however, complications in the absence of absolute thrombocytopenia have been reported. Diagnosis of HIT type II is based on clinical features and laboratory studies for the heparin-dependent platelet antibody. Immediate cessation of heparin administration is essential. Several alternative anticoagulant therapies have been studied and have shown promising results when used for this purpose. Two patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery are presented in whom pulmonary embolism developed due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II. In both cases, platelet counts were within the subnormal range at the time of the first thromboembolic complication. The clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic implications are discussed.     

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Acknowledging Its Presence in Low-Molecular Weight Heparin Therapy

Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is associated with a lower incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) than is unfractionated heparin. We describe a 75-year-old woman who developed HIT with thrombotic manifestations following the use of nadroparin calcium. Subsequent anticoagulation was achieved with warfarin. This case serves to highlight an important complication that cannot be ignored despite its low incidence. The majority of HIT cases are likely to occur in LMWH-treated patients because LMWH replaces unfractionated heparin for most indications. The lack of suitable alternative anticoagulant treatments for patients with HIT in Singapore is also emphasized.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a review

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a relevant adverse drug reaction consisting in a hypercoagulable state caused by an anticoagulant agent. The incidence is approximately 6.5% in patients receiving unfractionated heparin after orthopedic surgery, and is equal to or lower than 1% in other settings. HIT occurrence is a function of heparin type, duration of heparin administration, patient population, and gender. The pathogenesis is due to an antibody response to the complex heparin/platelet factor 4 in most cases, with secondary activation of platelets and coagulation, and finally increased thrombin generation. Thrombocytopenia, venous or arterial thrombosis, heparin-induced skin necrosis, adrenal hemorrhage, and transient amnesia can characterize the clinical course of HIT. Platelet monitoring in patients receiving heparin is indicated to early detect HIT. A thrombotic event can be the first manifestation of HIT. Laboratory demonstration of heparin-dependent platelet activation confirms the clinical diagnosis; antigenic or functional assays are available. Once HIT is highly likely or confirmed serologically, immediate heparin cessation is mandatory and an alternative therapeutic anticoagulant is needed due to the high risk (or the presence) of thrombotic events. The available nonheparin anticoagulants aim to reduce thrombin generation. Lepirudin, argatroban, and bivalirudin (direct thrombin inhibitors) and danaparoid and fondaparinux (factor Xa inhibitors) represent the current treatment options for HIT. Vitamin K antagonists can be used safely only after a stable platelet count has been obtained.     

Acute cardiorespiratory collapse from heparin: a consequence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND: Heparin has rarely been reported to cause acute cardiorespiratory reactions or collapse. Some reports relate this to underlying heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. OBJECTIVE: To confirm and increase awareness of acute life-threatening cardiopulmonary events when patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia are re-exposed to heparin. DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series. PATIENTS/SETTING: Four cardiovascular surgery patients were identified in two adjacent large urban hospitals over a 2-yr-period who experienced eight episodes of cardiorespiratory collapse immediately following heparin administration. All had underlying heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. RESULTS: Intravenous boluses of unfractionated heparin were given to four patients with known or previously unrecognized heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Two patients experienced severe respiratory distress within 15 min for which they required endotracheal intubation. Two other patients experienced cardiac arrest or a lethal arrhythmia within minutes of receiving intravenous heparin. Serologic tests for heparin-induced antibodies were positive in all patients. In three cases, the platelet count was normal or near normal but fell dramatically (71%) immediately following the heparin bolus. Three cases had prior diagnoses of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, but health care workers administered heparin either unaware of the diagnosis or ignorant of its significance. No patients died, but all required some form of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and subsequent intensive care. CONCLUSIONS: Heparin administration to patients with heparin-induced antibodies can result in life-threatening pulmonary or cardiac events. Appreciation of this phenomenon can unmask cases of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and strengthens the mandate to avoid any heparin exposure in affected patients. Recognition is crucial to avoiding disastrous outcomes.     

Management of anticoagulation in patients with subacute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia scheduled for heart transplantation

Anticoagulation management of patients with recent heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery is a serious challenge, and especially difficult in patients requiring urgent heart transplantation. As nonheparin anticoagulants during CPB bear a high risk of major bleeding, these patients are at risk of being taken off the transplant list. Short-term use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) for CPB, with restriction of UFH to the surgery itself, is safe and effective in patients with a history of HIT who test negative for antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies. We present evidence that it is safe to expand the concept of UFH reexposure to patients with subacute HIT (ie, those patients with recent HIT in whom the platelet count has recovered but in whom anti-PF4/heparin IgG antibodies remain detectable) requiring heart transplantation, if they test negative by a sensitive functional assay using washed platelets. This can be lifesaving in patients with end-stage heart failure.