Bioequivalence of Dapagliflozin/Metformin Extended-release Fixed-combination Drug Product and Single-component Dapagliflozin and Metformin Extended-release Tablets in Healthy Russian Subjects

Purpose

Fixed-combination drug products (FCDPs) combining dapagliflozin and metformin extended release (XR) may provide patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with an alternative antihyperglycemic treatment, which could improve adherence by reducing tablet burden. This study evaluated the bioequivalence of dapagliflozin/metformin XR FCDP versus the co-administration of the individual monotherapy tablets currently available for use in the Russian Federation.

Pharmacokinetic Variables of Dapagliflozin/Metformin Extended-release Fixed-dose Combination in Healthy Chinese Volunteers and Regional Comparison

PurposeA fixed-dose combination (FDC) product combining dapagliflozin and metformin may increase medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by minimizing pill burden associated with co-administration of individual component (IC) formulations and, consequently, improve cost-efficiency and compliance. This study evaluated the bioequivalence of the dapagliflozin/metformin FDC product versus IC administration in healthy volunteers from a Chinese population and assessed the safety profile of the FDC product. In addition, pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety comparisons of dapagliflozin and metformin across different regions were conducted to evaluate regional differences.MethodsThis single-center, open-label, parallel-cohort, randomized, 2-period, crossover study enrolled Chinese adults (aged 18–55 years). Volunteers in cohort 1 received either a single FDC tablet of dapagliflozin/metformin extended release (XR) (5/500 mg) or IC tablets (dapagliflozin [5 mg] and metformin XR [500 mg]). Volunteers in cohort 2 received a higher dosage in a similar manner (dapagliflozin [10 mg] and metformin XR [1000 mg]). Volunteers in each cohort were subsequently crossed over to receive the alternate cohort treatment. Plasma concentrations of dapagliflozin and metformin were determined, and bioequivalence analyses were performed under standard fed conditions.FindingsEighty healthy Chinese volunteers (89.9% male; mean age, 28.7 years) were randomized into cohort 1 (n = 40) and cohort 2 (n = 39; 1 volunteer withdrew before receiving study treatment). The mean plasma concentration–time profiles of the dapagliflozin and metformin FDC and IC formulations for both doses were found to be nearly superimposable. Dapagliflozin and metformin XR FDC were bioequivalent to the IC tablets, with 90% CIs for each pairwise comparison contained within the 80% to 125% bioequivalence limits. Both the FDC and IC formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events/death. PK parameters for dapagliflozin in the Chinese volunteers were slightly to moderately higher than those from studies conducted in Brazil, Russia, and the United States, and the safety profile of the dapagliflozin/metformin FDC product was consistent with that of other studies. The difference in PK parameters among the 4 regions was not clinically meaningful.ImplicationsThe bioequivalence of the dapagliflozin/metformin FDC and IC formulations in healthy Chinese adults was established without any new safety concerns. Notably, the observed bioequivalence may be extrapolated to patients with T2DM as the PK parameters of dapagliflozin and metformin in healthy adults are similar to those reported in patients with T2DM. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04856007.     

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Lobeglitazone and Dapagliflozin at Steady State

PurposeCoadministration of lobeglitazone and dapagliflozin is expected to result in a blood glucose–lowering effect, followed by a gradual increase, in clinical usage; however, combining drugs could cause negative interactions. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the coadministration of lobeglitazone and dapagliflozin on their individual pharmacokinetic properties at steady state in healthy male volunteers in the fasted state.MethodsThis study consisted of 2 parts, each of which was a randomized, open-labeled, multiple-dose, 2-way crossover study in 20 healthy male volunteers in each part. Blood samples were taken periodically over a 48-h period after dosing to derive total plasma lobeglitazone and dapagliflozin pharmacokinetic properties; safety profile was evaluated throughout the study.FindingsWhen the pharmacokinetic properties of dapagliflozin were evaluated following its administration alone and in combination with lobeglitazone, point estimate and 90% CI of the geometric mean ratio of dapagliflozin AUC_τ were entirely within the conventional bioequivalence range of 80%–125%. However, although it was not clinically meaningful, its C_ss,max was ~8% lower in subjects receiving multiple doses of dapagliflozin and lobeglitazone than that in those administered dapagliflozin alone. The pharmacokinetic properties of lobeglitazone were evaluated following its administration alone and in combination with dapagliflozin. The geometric mean ratios and 90% CIs of the lobeglitazone C_ss,max and AUC_τ were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 80%–125%.ImplicationsCoadministration of lobeglitazone and dapagliflozin had no apparent clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetic properties of either drug. Based on these findings, it is anticipated that lobeglitazone and dapagliflozin can be coadministered without dose adjustment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03616392     

Celecoxib-tramadol co-crystal: A Randomized 4-Way Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study

PurposeCelecoxib-tramadol co-crystal (CTC) is a first-in-class co-crystal of celecoxib and racemic tramadol. This Phase 1 bioavailability study compared single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of CTC with those of the individual reference products from the United States, immediate-release celecoxib and tramadol, taken alone and simultaneously to determine their systemic exposure.MethodsThis was a single-center, randomized, single-dose, open-label, 4-period, 4-sequence, crossover study conducted in healthy subjects between October and December 2016. Study treatments included 200-mg CTC (equivalent to 112-mg celecoxib and 88-mg tramadol; Treatment-1); 100-mg tramadol (Treatment-2); 100-mg celecoxib (Treatment-3); and 100-mg celecoxib plus 100-mg tramadol (Treatment-4). The PK parameters of interest were C_max, AUC_0–T, and AUC_0–∞, which were also calculated normalized to the dose. T_max was only considered as supportive. The statistical analysis was based on a parametric analysis of variance model of the PK parameters; the two-sided 90% CI of the ratio of geometric mean values for the C_max, AUC_0–T, and AUC_0–∞ was based on ln-transformed data, and T_max was rank-transformed.FindingsThirty-six subjects aged 18 to 55 years (21 male subjects, 15 female subjects; mean age, 35 years) participated in the study. Celecoxib from CTC presented a lower C_max, reduced AUCs, and a faster T_max. The interference in celecoxib absorption when celecoxib and tramadol are administered together was minimized with the CTC. For Treatment-1, -3, and -4, celecoxib PK parameters were 259, 318, and 165 ng/mL (C_max), respectively; 1930, 2348, and 1929 ng • h/mL (AUC_0–T); and 1.5, 3.0, and 2.5 hours (T_max). Tramadol and its active metabolite O-desmethyl tramadol from CTC presented lower C_max and AUCs as well as a longer T_max. Tramadol/O-desmethyl tramadol PK parameters for Treatment-1, -2, and -4 were 214/55, 305/78, and 312/78 ng/mL for C_max; 2507/846, 2709/965, and 2888/1010 ng • h/mL for AUC_0–T; and 3.0/4.0, 2.0/2.5, and 1.9/2.5 hours for T_max. Reported adverse events (none unexpected) occurred more frequently with Treatment-2 and Treatment-4.ImplicationsThe aim of this study was to compare the PK profile of the US-marketed tramadol and celecoxib products with CTC to determine their systemic exposure and to validate the dosing regimen for a subsequent pivotal factorial Phase 3study. PK parameters of each active component in CTC were favorably modified by co-crystallization and did not result in higher systemic exposure compared with US-marketed celecoxib, tramadol, and their concomitant administration. © 2021 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.     

A Phase I Study to Show the Relative Bioavailability and Bioequivalence of Fixed-Dose Combinations of Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in Healthy Subjects

PurposePulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a life-threatening disease that typically causes shortness of breath and exercise intolerance. Combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil has proven to be more effective at preventing clinical failure events in patients with PAH than either drug alone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of an ambrisentan/tadalafil fixed-dose combination (FDC) compared with co-administration of the 2 monotherapies.MethodsThis 3-part, randomized, single-dose, open-label crossover study was conducted in healthy volunteers. The first part of the study consisted of a 5-way crossover that compared the relative bioavailability of 4 FDC formulations (10-mg ambrisentan + 40-mg tadalafil) with co-administered reference monotherapies. One formulation was selected and its relative bioavailability was assessed when produced in 3 different granulation sizes during the second part of the study. In the third part of the study, the bioequivalence of the candidate FDC with the reference monotherapies was evaluated for the 10-mg/40-mg dose strength, in addition to 2 other dose strengths (5 mg/20 mg and 5 mg/40 mg). For all parts of the study, blood samples were taken at regular intervals after each dose, ambrisentan and tadalafil concentrations determined, and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (C_max, AUC_0–∞, and AUC_0–t) obtained. Test/reference ratios of the geometric means of PK parameters were used to evaluate bioequivalence. Safety and tolerability were assessed by recording adverse events and monitoring vital signs, ECGs, and clinical laboratory data.FindingsOf the 174 subjects screened for eligibility, 112 were allocated to a randomized treatment sequence across all study parts, and 100 completed their full assigned treatments. All 4 FDC formulations tested during part 1 of the study yielded PK parameters similar those of the reference treatments. In part 2, granulation size was found to not affect the relative bioavailability of the selected formulation. In part 3, the selected FDC was found to be bioequivalent to co-administration of the monotherapies in both the fasted and fed states. The FDC was also found to be bioequivalent to the reference treatments at the 2 additional dose strengths. All but one of the adverse events was mild to moderate in intensity, and no serious adverse events were reported.ImplicationsAn ambrisentan/tadalafil FDC was bioequivalent to concurrently administered monotherapies and therefore represents a viable alternative treatment to co-administration. Use of an FDC is likely to be associated with reduced costs and improved patient compliance. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02688387.     

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate and Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate Metered Dose Inhalers in Healthy Chinese Adults: A Randomized,Double-blind,Parallel-group Study

PurposeThe objective of this study was to assess pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of 2 fixed-dose combinations in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate metered-dose inhaler (BGF MDI; triple combination) and glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (GFF MDI; dual combination). The PK and safety profiles of BGF MDI and GFF MDI were assessed for the first time in healthy Chinese adults after single and repeated (7-day) dosing.MethodsThis Phase I, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted at a single site in Shanghai, China. Male or female Chinese subjects, 18–45 years of age and in good general health, were randomized 1:1:1 to receive BGF MDI 320/14.4/10 μg, BGF MDI 160/14.4/10 μg, or GFF MDI 14.4/10 μg. PK parameters were assessed after a single dose (day 1) and at steady state (day 8), and included AUC_0–12, C_max, and T_max. Tolerability was assessed using physical examination findings, adverse events reporting, 12-lead ECG, vital signs, and clinical laboratory values.FindingsNinety-six subjects (mean age, 25.6 years; 83.3% male) were randomized and received treatment. All randomized subjects were included in the safety and PK populations. After single and repeated dosing, budesonide AUC_0–12 and C_max were increased dose proportionally from BGF MDI 160/14.4/10 μg to BGF MDI 320/14.4/10 μg, respectively (single dose: AUC_0–12, 811.8 vs 1748 h · pg/mL; C_max, 224.3 vs 459.3 pg/mL; repeated dosing: AUC_0–12, 1250 vs 2510 h · pg/mL; C_max, 315.4 vs 626.4 pg/mL). After single and repeated dosing, glycopyrronium AUC_0–12 and C_max were similar across all treatments (single dose: AUC_0–12, 27.20–29.40 h · pg/mL; C_max, 4.884–5.674 pg/mL; repeated dosing: AUC_0–12, 69.49–77.08 h · pg/mL; C_max, 11.30–13.12 pg/mL) and formoterol (single dose: AUC_0–12, 46.49–53.58 h · pg/mL; C_max 9.651–10.62 pg/mL; repeated dosing: AUC_0–12, 81.94–85.32 h · pg/mL; C_max, 16.13–17.71 pg/mL), suggesting that the addition of budesonide did not appreciably alter the PK properties of GFF MDI. All treatment-emergent adverse events were mild in severity and rates were similar across groups (range, 50.0%–56.3%). There were no new or unexpected findings on tolerability.ImplicationsOverall, all treatments were well tolerated and PK parameters were generally comparable to those previously reported in Western and Japanese healthy subjects, suggesting that the doses of BGF MDI and GFF MDI in development globally for COPD are also appropriate for Chinese patients with COPD. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03075267.     

A Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence Study Comparing Pirfenidone Tablet and Capsule Dosage Forms in Healthy Adult Volunteers

Introduction

Pirfenidone film-coated tablets were developed to offer an alternative to the marketed capsule formulation. This study assessed the bioequivalence of the tablet and capsule formulations under fed and fasted states.

Methods

A Phase I, open-label, randomized, four-treatment-period, four-sequence, crossover pharmacokinetics study (NCT02525484) was conducted. Each subject received an 801-mg single dose of pirfenidone as three 267-mg capsules or one 801-mg tablet under fasted and fed conditions. Pirfenidone plasma C _max, AUC_0–t and AUC_0–∞ were used to assess bioequivalence.

Results

Forty-four subjects were randomized to treatment. The 801-mg tablet in the fasted state met bioequivalence criteria [90% confidence intervals (CI) 80.00–125.00%] for the GLSM ratios of natural log-transformed C _max, AUC_0–t and AUC_0–∞. Under fed conditions, the 801-mg tablet met the bioequivalence criteria for AUC_0–t and AUC_0–∞, but slightly exceeded the bioequivalence criteria for the C _max (90% CI of 108.26–125.60%). The tablet C _max was approximately 17% higher than that of the capsules. In the fed state, the tablet C _max, and both AUC_0–t and AUC_0–∞ were reduced by 39% and 17%, respectively, relative to the fasted state. The tablet and capsules had acceptable tolerability profiles.

Conclusions

The pirfenidone 801-mg tablet met bioequivalence criteria when compared with three 267-mg capsules in the fasted state. The tablet C _max was slightly higher relative to capsules in the fed state, but this is not expected to have a clinically meaningful impact on the benefit–risk profile of pirfenidone.

Funding

This work was supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

     

Open-label,Single-dose Studies of the Pharmacokinetics of Edaravone in Subjects with Mild,Moderate, or Severe Hepatic Impairment Compared to Subjects with Normal Hepatic Functioning

PurposeTwo studies were conducted to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and tolerability of edaravone in Japanese subjects with mild to moderate hepatic impairment or normal hepatic functioning (study 1), and in white subjects with severe hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic functioning (study 2).MethodsStudies 1 and 2 were multicenter, open-label, single-dose studies that included subjects aged 18–75 years. In study 1, subjects were stratified into 3 different groups of hepatic functioning according to Child-Pugh score: mild hepatic impairment, score 5 or 6 (n = 8); moderate hepatic impairment, score 7–9 (n = 6); or normal hepatic functioning (n = 8). In study 2, subjects had severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 10–14; n = 6) or normal hepatic functioning (n = 6). In both studies, all subjects were given edaravone 30 mg IV infused over 60 min on the morning of day 1. Blood samples for use in PK analyses were collected from days 1–3. The PK properties (C_max, AUC_0–last, and AUC_0–∞) of edaravone and its sulfate conjugate metabolite were measured.FindingsIn study 1, the geometric least-squares mean (GLSM) C_max and AUC_0–∞ of unchanged edaravone were 1.203- and 1.065-fold greater, respectively, in subjects with mild hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic functioning, and were 1.235- and 1.142-fold greater, respectively, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic functioning. In study 2, GLSM C_max and AUC_0–∞ of unchanged edaravone were 1.203- and 1.190-fold greater, respectively, in subjects with severe hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic functioning. In both studies the AUC_0–last, AUC_0–∞, unbound AUC from time zero to infinity, and C_max of unchanged edaravone were increased slightly with increases in Child-Pugh classification. No adverse events considered related to edaravone were reported, except for 1 case of sinus bradycardia in a subject with normal hepatic functioning in study 2. The event was moderate in severity, considered as possibly related to edaravone, and resolved during the study.ImplicationsMild to moderate and severe hepatic impairment had no apparent clinically significant effects on the PK profile of edaravone in Japanese and white subjects, respectively, relative to individuals with normal hepatic functioning, and there were no notable tolerability concerns. Thus, edaravone dosage adjustments are unlikely to be needed in edaravone-treated patients with mild to moderate and severe hepatic impairment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03289234 (mild to moderate hepatic impairment) and NCT03664544 (severe hepatic impairment).     

Pharmacokinetics of duloxetine hydrochloride enteric-coated tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers: A randomized,open-label,single- and multiple-dose study

Background: Duloxetine hydrochloride is a balanced selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. Despite being widely used for the treatment of major depressive disorder in China, little information is available on the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of duloxetine in Chinese subjects.Objectives: This study was designed to determine the concentration of duloxetine in human plasma and to compare the PK properties of duloxetine after administration of single and multiple doses of duloxetine in healthy Chinese volunteers.Methods: A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for determining the concentration of duloxetine in human plasma was developed and applied to this single-center, open-label, single- and multiple-dose PK study. Subjects were randomized to receive a single dose of 30, 60, or 90 mg of duloxetine. Those who received the 30-mg dose continued on to the multiple-dose phase and received 30 mg twice daily for 7 days. In the single-dose phase, sequential blood samples were collected from 0 to 60 hours after drug administration. In the multiple-dose phase, samples were obtained before drug administration on days 4, 5, 6, and 7 to determine the Cssmin of duloxetine; on day 7, samples were collected from 0 to 60 hours after drug administration. The PK parameters that were calculated included C_max, T_max, t_1/2, AUC_0?t AUC_0?∞, CL, V_d, C_ssmax, C_ssmin, C_ssav, AUC_ss, AUC_ss(0?t), and C_max:C_min ratio. All values were expressed as mean (SD). Tolerability was assessed throughout the study.Results: The LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated. The standard calibration curve was linear in the concentration range from 0.89 to 106.8 ng/mL; the correlation coefficient was >0.995. The methodo-logic recovery and extraction recovery ranged from 87.22% to 113.75% and 72.81% to 89.96%, respectively. Both the intraday and interday relative SDs were <11%. Thirty Chinese subjects (3 groups of 10 subjects [5 men, 5 women] each) were enrolled in the single-dose phase of the PK study. The mean (SD) age of the subjects was 23.2 (1.8) years (range, 21–25 years); their mean (SD) weight was 61.0 (7.7) kg (range, 52–80 kg) and height was 169.0 (7.1) cm (range, 155–180 cm). The main PK parameters for duloxetine after administration of a single oral dose of 30, 60, and 90 mg were as follows: C_max = 22.46 (15.15), 44.40 (17.18), and 60.78 (27.84) ng/mL, respectively; AUC_0–60 = 328.64 (203.64), 696.04 (337.82), and 1219.33 (598.29) ng/mL · h^?1; AUC_0?∞) = 359.68 (201.01), 733.82 (343.40), and 1280.51 (644.81) ng/mL · h^?1; T_max = 6.83 (1.99), 6.10 (1.29), and 6.60 (1.58) hours; t1/2 = 12.95 (3.64), 12.81 (2.31), and 11.66 (2.06) hours; CL = 107.90 (53.05), 98.41 (41.98), and 109.58 (52.74) L/hour; and V_d = 2518.88 (1707.71), 1879.74 (999.09), and 1858.47 (1203.69) L. The 10 subjects who received the 30-mg dose in the single-dose phase continued on to the multiple-dose phase and received 30 mg of duloxetine twice daily for 7 days. Mean (SD) values for the main PK parameters for duloxetine after administration of multiple doses were as follows: C_ssmax = 47.33 (16.95) ng/mL; C_ssmm = 27.92 (9.46) ng/mL; AUC_ss(0?t) = 407.25 (125.94) ng/mL · h^?1; C_ssav = 33.94 (13.00) ng/mL; T_max = 6.36 (0.92) hours; t_1/2 = 11.19 (1.98) hours; CL = 83.12 (28.75) L/hour; and V_d = 1359.01 (590.06) L.Conclusions: In these healthy Chinese subjects, AUC and Cmax increased proportionally with the dose, whereas t_1/2 was independent of the dose. Linear PK properties were found at doses of 30 to 90 mg. No statistically significant differences were observed between the PK parameters for the subjects in the multiple-dose phase (t_1/2, CL, V_d) and those for subjects in the single-dose phase. The AUC and C_max were greater after administration of multiple doses than after administration of a single dose, suggesting du-loxetine accumulation with multiple-dose administration of 30 mg.     

Riluzole Oral Suspension: Bioavailability Following Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube-modeled Administration Versus Direct Oral Administration

PurposeDuring amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression, up to 85% of patients develop dysphagia. Riluzole oral suspension 50 mg/10 mL is bioequivalent to riluzole 50-mg film-coated tablets administered orally under fasting conditions. Here, we compare the bioavailability of a single 50-mg dose of riluzole oral suspension via intragastric tube, a proxy for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy administration, with that of oral administration in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. Secondary objectives included the plasma pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of each administration route.MethodsThis was a single-center, single-dose, open-label, randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence, crossover bioequivalence/bioavailability study. Healthy volunteers were randomized to riluzole oral suspension 50 mg/10 mL either via nasogastric tube or orally, with a 5-day washout before crossover.FindingsA total of 32 subjects were randomized (safety population); 30 were eligible for pharmacokinetic analysis. The ratios (nasogastric tube/oral) of the geometric least squares means and the geometric 90% CIs of AUC_0–t, AUC_0–inf, and C_max were calculated to be 90.60% (85.66%–95.82%), 90.43% (85.47%–95.67%), and 96.99% (89.40%–105.23%), respectively, indicating bioequivalence. No significant differences in C_max, T_max, K_el, and t_1/2el between treatments were found. Overall, riluzole oral suspension was well tolerated. No deaths or other serious adverse events were reported.ImplicationsIn this study, riluzole oral suspension was bioequivalent when administered intragastrically and orally in healthy subjects under fasting conditions. Both administration methods were well tolerated. These results show that intragastric administration of riluzole oral suspension may provide an important formulation option in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who have a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube.     

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions Between Henagliflozin,a Novel Selective SGLT-2 Inhibitor,and Warfarin in Healthy Chinese Subjects

PurposeWhile controlling blood glucose, patients with diabetes and abnormal coagulation should be treated with positive anticoagulation because the hypercoagulable state of their blood is the primary cause of macroangiopathy. The goal of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) interactions between henagliflozin, a novel selective sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, and warfarin in healthy subjects.MethodsThis single-center, open-label, single-arm clinical study was conducted in 16 healthy male Chinese subjects. According to the study protocol, the PK properties of henagliflozin 10 mg/d and warfarin 5 mg/d were collected and tabulated in accordance with sampling time. All study drugs were given with once-daily administration. Subjects were monitored for adverse reactions and their severity, outcomes, and relationship to study drug. This influences of warfarin on the PK properties of henagliflozin (C_max,ss and AUC_τ,ss), the effects of henagliflozin on the PK properties of warfarin (C_max, AUC_0–t, and AUC_0–∞), and the influences of henagliflozin on the PD properties of warfarin (PT_max, PT_AUC, INR_max, and INR_AUC) were evaluated.FindingsThe geometric mean ratios (GMRs; 90% CIs) of henagliflozin C_max,ss and AUC_τ,ss were 101.75% (96.11%–107.72%) and 102.21% (100.04%–104.42%), respectively. The GMRs (90% CIs) of S- and R-warfarin C_max, AUC_0–t, and AUC_0–∞ were as follows: C_max, 114.31% (106.30%–122.91%) and 115.09% (109.46%–121.01%), respectively; AUC_0–t, 120.15% (116.71%–123.69%) and 119.01% (116.32%–121.76%); and AUC_0–∞, 120.81% (117.17%–124.58%) and 121.94% (118.90%–125.05%). The GMRs (90% CIs) of warfarin PT_max and PT_AUC were 92.73% (91.25%–94.22%) and 97.42% (96.61%–98.24%). The GMRs (90% CIs) of warfarin INR_max and INR_AUC were 92.66% (91.17%–94.17%) and 97.36% (96.52%–98.21%). A total of 32 cases of mild adverse events were reported, and were recovered/resolved. There were no serious adverse events reported.ImplicationsNo significant clinically relevant effects on the PK/PD properties of henagliflozin or warfarin were found with coadministration of the two drugs in these healthy male Chinese subjects. Based on these findings, it is expected that henagliflozin and warfarin can be used in combination without dose adjustment. Chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: CTR20190240.     

Relative fasting bioavailability of two formulations of nateglinide 60 mg in healthy male Chinese volunteers: an open-label, randomized-sequence, single-dose, two-way crossover study

BackgroundNateglinide, N-(trans-4-isopropylcyclohexyl-carbonyl)-d-phenylalanine, is a potent insulin secretagogue designed to restore early-phase insulin secretion. It increases pancreatic insulin secretion by competitively binding to sulfonylurea receptors inhibiting adenosine triphosphate–sensitive potassium channels and thus reducing blood glucose levels. The drug has a rapid onset (causing immediate insulin release) and a short duration (allowing insulin to return to baseline levels between meals) of insulinotropic action.ObjectiveTo meet the requirements for marketing a new generic product, this study was designed to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters and relative fasting bioavailability of new generic (test) formulation of nateglinide with the reference formulation of nateglinide in healthy Chinese male volunteers.MethodsThis open-label, single-dose, randomized-sequence, 2-way crossover study was performed at Nanjing First Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Eligible subjects were healthy male volunteers who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single 60-mg (0.88 mg/kg) dose of the 2 formulations, followed by a 1-week washout period and then administration of the alternate formulation. Study drugs were administered after a 10-hour overnight fast. Concentrations of nateglinide were determined by using a validated LC-MS method. For analysis of pharmacokinetic properties, including C_max, AUC_0–10, and AUC_0–∞, blood samples were obtained at intervals over the 10-hour period after study drug administration. As established by the State Food and Drug Administration, the formulations were assumed bioequivalent if 90% CIs for the test/reference ratios of ln-transformed values of C_max and AUC (obtained by using ANOVA) were within the predetermined equivalence range (80%–125%). Tolerability was assessed by monitoring vital signs and laboratory tests (hematology, blood biochemistry, hepatic function, and urinalysis) and by questioning subjects about adverse events.ResultsThe 90% CIs for nateglinide were as follows: C_max, 98.4% to 118.6%; AUC_0–10, 99.5% to 110.3%. Both C_max and AUC_0–10 met the predetermined criteria for assuming bioequivalence. The relative bioavailability of the test formulation was estimated to be 102.1% (13.5%). One volunteer (5%) experienced a headache after administration of the test formulation. This resolved spontaneously within 1 hour and was considered by the investigators to be mild. No serious adverse events were reported. No period or sequence effects were observed.ConclusionsIn this study of healthy Chinese male volunteers, a single 60-mg dose of nateglinide (test formulation) met the regulatory criteria for assuming bioequivalence to the established reference formulation. Both formulations were well tolerated. Chinese Clinical Trials registration number: ChiCTR-TRC-11001754.     

Bioavailability of three rufinamide oral suspensions compared with the marketed 400-mg tablet formulation: results from a randomized-sequence, open-label, four-period, four-sequence crossover study in healthy subjects

BackgroundRufinamide is indicated for the adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in patients aged ≥4 years.ObjectivesThe primary purpose of this study was to compare the relative bioavailability and other pharmacokinetics of rufinamide administered as a 400-mg tablet formulation (reference) with 10 mL of a newly developed 40-mg/mL suspension (test) manufactured using 3 different homogenization speeds in healthy subjects under fed conditions. The study also explored whether homogenization speed had any effect on rufinamide pharmacokinetics when administered as a suspension formulation.MethodsThis was a randomized, open-label, crossover, single-dose study in healthy, fed subjects aged 18 to 55 years (inclusive), conducted at a single center in the United Kingdom. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment sequences, with each sequence consisting of 4 treatment periods. In each treatment period, subjects received a single dose of either the reference product (400-mg rufinamide tablet) or the test product (10 mL of rufinamide suspension [40 mg/mL] manufactured using 3 different homogenization speeds [1800, 2100, and 3000 revolutions per minute (rpm)]). Serial blood samples were collected for 72 hours after dosing for the measurement of rufinamide in plasma. Primary comparisons between test (suspension) and reference (tablet) formulations focused on AUC from 0 to 72 hours (AUC_0–72h) and C_max. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the ratios of geometric least squares means and associated 90% CIs of AUC_0–72h and C_max were within the predetermined range of 80%–125%, according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) requirements. Tolerability was assessed by subject interviews, physical examinations, and laboratory tests.ResultsTwenty-four healthy subjects were randomized: 8 were male and 16 were female; 22 white, 1 black, and 1 Asian subjects were enrolled. Mean (SD) age was 29.8 (10.0) years. Mean weight was 68.2 (11.0) kg, and mean body mass index was 23.6 (3.0) kg/m². Twenty-one subjects completed the study; 2 subjects discontinued because of adverse events (both urinary tract infections considered unrelated to treatment) and 1 because of protocol deviation. The 72-hour pharmacokinetic data for the last complete treatment period before discontinuation were included in group means.The geometric least squares mean C_max value for the reference tablet formulation was 4840.24 ng/mL; and 4254.87, 4204.29, and 4418.44 ng/mL for the 1800-, 2100-, and 3000-rpm test suspensions, respectively. The ratios of the geometric least squares mean values (test/reference) for C_max were 0.88 (90% CI, 0.84–0.92), 0.87 (0.83–0.91) and 0.91 (0.88–0.95) for the 1800-, 2100-, and 3000-rpm suspensions, respectively, compared with the tablet formulation. The geometric least squares mean AUC_0–72h values were 75,960.48 ng · h/mL for the tablet formulation and 74,279.02, 73,746.03, and 73,701.17 ng · h/mL for the 1800-, 2100-, and 3000-rpm suspensions, respectively. The ratios of the geometric least squares mean values (test/reference) for AUC_0–72h were 0.98 (90% CI, 0.95–1.00), 0.97 (0.95–1.00) and 0.97 (0.95–0.99) for the 1800-, 2100-, and 3000-rpm suspensions, respectively, compared with the tablet formulation. The ratios and associated 90% CI limits (for test suspensions to the reference tablet) for AUC_0–72h and C_max were within the FDA and EMA criteria for assuming bioequivalence to the 400 mg tablet. Comparisons among the 3 rufinamide test suspensions also met the regulatory criteria for assuming bioequivalence to one another.Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were experienced by 18.2% (4/22) of subjects treated with the 400-mg tablet, 21.7% (5/23) of subjects treated with the 1800-rpm suspension, 26.1% (6/23) of subjects treated with the 2100-rpm suspension, and 8.7% (2/23) of subjects treated with the 3000-rpm suspension. Overall, 54.2% (13/24) of subjects experienced a TEAE; all TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity, with headache being the most frequently reported (37.5% [9/24]). There were no serious adverse events or deaths.ConclusionThis single-dose study in a small population of fed, healthy subjects found no statistically significant differences in relative bioavailability among each of the 3 test suspensions and the currently marketed 400-mg tablet formulation of rufinamide, meeting FDA and EMA regulatory requirements for assuming bioequivalence.     

Relative Bioavailability of a Single 4-mg Dose of Somatropin Administered by Subcutaneous Injection or by Needle-free Device and Coadministered With the Growth Hormone Inhibitor Octreotide Acetate in Healthy Adult Subjects

Purpose

Somatropin, used to treat growth hormone deficiency, has been traditionally administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection with needle and syringe. Needle-free devices offer ease of administration and may improve adherence and outcomes. This study evaluated the relative bioavailability of somatropin delivered with a needle-free device compared with traditional SC injection.

Relative bioavailability of generic and branded 250-mg and 500-mg oral chlorphenesin carbamate tablets in healthy Korean volunteers: A single-dose,randomized-sequence,open-label,two-period crossover trial

Background: Chlorphenesin carbamate is a skeletal muscle relaxant approved in Korea for use in the treatment of pain and discomfort related to skeletal muscle trauma and inflammation.Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the bioequivalence of a generic formulation of chlorphenesin carbamate at doses of 250 and 500 mg and 2 branded formulations of the same doses in healthy Korean adults.Methods: This single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean male and female volunteers. Subjects were assigned to receive, in a randomized sequence, a single dose of the generic (test) and branded (reference) formulations of chlorphenesin carbamate at a dose of 250 or 500 mg. Blood samples were drawn at 0, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 15 hours after administration. Pharmacokinetic properties (C_max, T_max, AUC_0?t AUC_0-∞, t_1/2, and ke) were determined using HPLC. The formulations were to be considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs of the treatment ratios of the geometric means of C_max and AUC_0?t were within a predetermined range of log 0.80 to log 1.25 based on regulatory criteria. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring for adverse events (AEs) on physical examination and/or e-mail and personal interview at the beginning and end of each study period.Results: Twenty-eight subjects (22 men, 6 women) received chlorphenesin carbamate at the 250-mg dose, and 24 male subjects received the 500-mg dose. The mean (SD) ages of the subjects were 24.0 (2.6) and 24.0 (1.9) years in the 250- and 500-mg groups, respectively. No significant differences were found between the test and reference formulations (90% CIs:C_max, 1.0048–1.1153 with the 250-mg dose and 0.9630–1.1189 with the 500-mg dose; AUC_0?t, 0.9882–1.0546 and 0.9842–1.0578, respectively). No clinically significant AEs (upper gastric pain, abdominal bloating, pyrexia, edema, nausea, heartburn, constipation, headache, dizziness, drowsiness, or fatigue) were reported throughout the study.Conclusion: In this single-dose study in these healthy Korean subjects, the generic and branded formulations of chlorphenesin carbamate 250 and 500 mg met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence. All formulations were well tolerated.     

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Tegoprazan and Naproxen,Aceclofenac, and Celecoxib in Healthy Korean Male Subjects

PurposeTegoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker used for gastric acid suppression and may be used with NSAIDs to reduce gastrointestinal adverse effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between tegoprazan and commonly used NSAIDS, namely, naproxen, aceclofenac, and celecoxib.MethodsAn open-label, 3-cohort, randomized, multiple-dose, 3-way crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. In cohort 1, tegoprazan (50-mg tablet, once daily) and naproxen (500-mg tablet, twice daily) were administered separately or concurrently for 7 days in each period. In cohort 2, tegoprazan and aceclofenac (100-mg tablet, twice daily) were administered separately or concurrently for 7 days in each period. In cohort 3, tegoprazan and celecoxib (200-mg capsule, twice daily) were administered separately or concurrently for 7 days in each period. Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the last dose.FindingsSeventeen subjects from cohort 1, sixteen subjects from cohort 2, and thirteen subjects from cohort 3 were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. In cohort 1, the geometric least squares mean ratios (90% CIs) for AUC_τ (AUC profiles over the dosing interval) and C_ss,max (C_max at steady state) were 1.01 (0.91–1.12) and 0.99 (0.83–1.17) for tegoprazan, and 1.00 (0.97–1.03) and 1.04 (0.99–1.09) for naproxen, respectively. The values in cohort 2 were 1.03 (0.93–1.13) and 0.94 (0.86–1.04) for tegoprazan, and 1.06 (1.00–1.12) and 1.31 (1.08–1.60) for aceclofenac. The values in cohort 3 were 1.01 (0.86–1.18) and 1.02 (0.87–1.19) for tegoprazan, and 1.08 (0.96–1.22) and 1.18 (0.97–1.43) for celecoxib.ImplicationsChanges in the maximum aceclofenac or celecoxib concentrations were detected after concurrent administration with tegoprazan, which were considered mainly due to the pharmacodynamic effect of tegoprazan. Because systemic drug exposure (shown as AUC_τ) was unchanged after concurrent administration of any 3 NSAIDs with tegoprazan, the increase in aceclofenac or celecoxib C_ss,max when administered with tegoprazan would not be clinically significant in practice. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04639804.     

A randomized crossover study to assess the pharmacokinetics of a novel amphetamine extended-release orally disintegrating tablet in healthy adults

Objectives: In this pharmacokinetic (PK) study in healthy adults, we sought to: (1) compare the PK properties of a novel amphetamine extended-release orally disintegrating tablet formulation (Adzenys XR-ODT? [AMP XR-ODT]) to a reference extended-release mixed amphetamine salts (MAS ER) formulation and (2) assess the effect of food on AMP XR-ODT.

Methods: Forty-two adults were enrolled in a single-dose, open-label, 3-period, 3-treatment, randomized crossover study and received an 18.8-mg dose of AMP XR-ODT (fasted or fed) or equivalent dose (30 mg) of MAS ER (fasted). Plasma samples were analyzed for d-and l-amphetamine. Maximum plasma concentration (C_max), time to maximum plasma concentration (T_max), elimination half-life (T_1/2), area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC_last), from time zero to infinity (AUC_inf), relevant partial AUCs, and weight-normalized clearance (CL/F/kg) were assessed. The PK parameters were compared across treatments using an ANOVA. Safety was also assessed.

Results: A total of 39 adults completed this study. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval [CI]) for AMP XR-ODT/MAS ER C_max, AUC_5-last, AUC_last, and AUC_inf were within 80%–125% for both d-and l-amphetamine. The 90% CIs for AUC_0-5 were slightly below the 80%–125% range. When AMP XR-ODT was administered with food, there was a slight decrease in the d-and l-amphetamine C_max and approximately a 2-hour delay in T_max. The most common adverse events reported (>5% of participants) were dry mouth, palpitations, nausea, dizziness, headache, anxiety, and nasal congestion.

Conclusions: AMP XR-ODT displayed a PK profile similar to MAS ER, and no clinically relevant food effect was observed.     

Differences in immunogenicity associated with non-product related variability: insights from two pharmacokinetic studies using GP2017, an adalimumab biosimilar

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Antidrug antibody (ADA) development is known to occur with adalimumab treatment and impacts adalimumab exposure. Here, we compare the impact of immunogenicity on pharmacokinetics (PK) across two randomized PK studies of GP2017, an approved biosimilar adalimumab, in healthy subjects.

Methods: Healthy male subjects (N= 107 in study GP17-104; N= 90 in study GP17-103) received a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of the same GP2017 drug product batch. Cross-study PK comparison was performed for log-transformed C_max, AUC_0–360h, AUC_0–last, and AUC_0–inf, using an ANCOVA model.

Results: The proportion of ADA-positive subjects was higher in GP17-103 (in total 71.1%) vs. GP17-104 (57.9%). Comparison of GP2017 PK between studies showed that the exposure was lower in GP17-103 vs GP17-104, with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric mean ratios of AUC_0–last and AUC_0–inf being outside the range of 0.80–1.25. A subgroup analysis showed that in ADA-negative subjects 90% CIs for all PK parameters were within range, with geometric mean ratios close to 1.00.

Conclusion: The differences in GP2017 PK between the two groups are not considered to be product-related, but may be due to currently unknown factors related to differences between the two study populations.     

Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence comparison between orally disintegrating and conventional tablet formulations of flurbiprofen: A single-dose,randomized-sequence,open-label,two-period crossover study in healthy chinese male volunteers

Background: Flurbiprofen, an NSAID, is used for the treatment of inflammation and pain caused by rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis as well as soft-tissue injuries. A new orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) of flurbiprofen has recently been developed; this study was conducted to provide support for this drug to obtain marketing authorization in China.Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of flur-biprofen 50-mg ODT (test) with a conventional flur-biprofen 50-mg tablet (reference) under fasting conditions in healthy volunteers.Methods: This was a single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, 2-period crossover study. Healthy, nonsmoking Chinese male volunteers were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg (administered as three 50-mg tablets) of either the test or reference formulation of flurbiprofen, followed by a 7-day washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. Study drugs were administered after a 12-hour overnight fast. Blood samples were collected before dosing and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after dosing. Serum flurbiprofen concentrations were analyzed using a validated nonstereospe-cific liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrome-try method. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including C_max, T_max, t_1/2, AUC_0–24, and AUC_0-∞, were calculated and analyzed statistically. C_max, AUC_0–24, and AUC_0-∞ were used to test for bioequivalence after natural logarithm (ln)-transformation. Tolerability was evaluated throughout the study by clinical assessments, vital sign monitoring, physical examinations, 12-lead ECG, clinical laboratory tests, and questioning subjects about adverse events (AEs).Results: A total of 20 Chinese males (mean [SD] age, 21.4 [2.5] years [range, 19–28 years]; height, 174.4 [4.2] cm [range, 169–183 cm]; weight, 63.2 [5.1] kg [range, 56–78 kg]; body mass index, 20.8 [1.4] kg/m² [range, 19–24 kg/m²]) completed the study. No period or sequence effect was observed. The 90% CIs for the ln-transformed ratios of Cmax, AUC_0–24, and AUC_0-∞ were 99.9% to 115.9%, 97.8% to 107.9%, and 100.3% to 110.9%, respectively, meeting the predetermined criteria for bioequivalence. Two subjects (10.0%) experienced 1 of 2 mild AEs (increase in total bilirubin and dizziness), which were not considered to be associated with study drug administration.Conclusions: This single-dose 150-mg (three 50-mg tablets) study of each formulation of flurbiprofen found that the test and reference products met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in these fasting healthy Chinese male volunteers. Both formulations were generally well tolerated. State Food and Drug Administration of China study registration number: 2005L04356.     

A single-dose,randomized, two-way crossover study comparing two olanzapine tablet products in healthy adult male volunteers under fasting conditions

Background: Olanzapine is a psychotropic agent that belongs to the thienobenzodiazepine class.Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the bioequivalence of 2 commercial 10-mg tablet formulations of olanzapine by statistical analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameters C_max, AUC from 0 to 72 hours after dosing (AUC_0-72), and AUC_0-∞ as required by the Egyptian health authority for the marketing of a generic product.Methods: This bioequivalence study was carried out in healthy male volunteers using a single-dose, randomized, 2-way crossover design under fasting conditions. Statistical analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameters C_max, AUC_0-72, and AUC_0-∞ was conducted to determine bioequivalence (after log-transformation of data using analysis of variance and 90% CIs) and to gain marketing approval in Egypt. The formulations were considered to be bioequivalent if the log-transformed ratios of the 3 pharmacokinetic parameters were within the predetermined bioequivalence range (ie, 80%–125%), as established by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Both the test product (Trademark: Integrol^® [Global Napi Pharmaceuticals, Cairo, Egypt]) and the reference product (Trademark: Zyprexa^® [Eli Lilly and Company, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom]) were administered as 10-mg tablets with 240 mL of water after an overnight fast on 2 treatment days, separated by a 2-week washout period. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for 72 hours. Plasma samples were analyzed using a sensitive, reproducible, and accurate liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method capable of quantitating olanzapine in the range of 0.167 to 16.7 ng/mL, with a lower limit of quantitation of 0.167 ng/mL. Adverse events were reported by the volunteers as instructed or observed by the resident physician, and were recorded, tabulated, and evaluated.Results: Twenty-four healthy adult male volunteers participated in this study. Their mean (SD) age was 24.7 (6.2) years (range, 19–41 years), mean weight was 73.4 (6.7) kg (range, 64–89 kg), and mean height was 174.25 (4.6) cm (range, 168–186 cm). Values for C_max, AUC_0-72, AUC_0-∞, T_max, t_1/2, and the terminal disposition rate constant were found to be in agreement with previously reported values. The differences between the 2 products did not reach statistical significance at P ≤ 0.05 (90% CIs: C_max, 101.82–124.79; AUC_0-72, 93.36–102.04; and AUC_0-∞, 88.57–101.77). The test/reference ratio of these parameters was within the acceptance range of the FDA criterion for bioequivalence. Both formulations were apparently well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract (ie, no specific gastrointestinal tract-related adverse events were reported).Conclusions: In this small study in healthy male volunteers, there were no statistically significant differences in any of the calculated pharmacokinetic parameters between the 10-mg test and reference tablets of olanzapine. The 90% CIs for the ratios of mean C_max, AUC_0-72, and AUC_0-∞ were within the range of 80% to 125% (using log-transformed data), meeting the FDA regulatory criterion for bioequivalence. Both formulations were well tolerated.