Subcutaneous tocilizumab: recent advances for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction: Tocilizumab (TCZ) is a humanized anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor monoclonal antibody that is widely used to treat rheumatic arthritis (RA). When initially introduced, TCZ was administered by intravenous infusion. Since 2013, subcutaneous administration of TCZ has also been offered. Currently, we can choose the TCZ administration route according to patient preference.

Areas covered: We summarize TCZ therapy and review recent advances of TCZ-SC therapy. Initially, three pre-clinical phase III randomized controlled trials – MUSASHI, SUMMACTA, and BREVACTA – demonstrated the similar effectiveness and safety between subcutaneous TCZ (TCZ-SC) and intravenous TCZ (TCZ-IV). Several real-world TCZ-SC studies further confirmed these findings. These studies also focused on the influence of body weight. Since TCZ-SC is a fixed dose therapy, the efficacy of TCZ-SC 162 mg q2w was sometimes inadequate in high body weight patients. By contrast, TCZ-SC 162 mg qw therapy achieved a higher trough serum concentration of TCZ than TCZ-IV 8 mg/kg q4w. No additional safety concerns were noted. Finally, possible differences between the IL-6 inhibitor and IL-6 receptor inhibitor are discussed.

Expert opinion: There are no appreciable differences between TCZ-SC and TCZ-IV in clinical practice. Thus, TCZ-SC is an attractive option for RA patients.     

Safety of tocilizumab in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Introduction: Tocilizumab (TCZ) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody and IL-6 receptor antagonist, currently approved for the treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) in children aged 2 years or older refractory to conventional treatment. The most common adverse events in patients treated with TCZ were infections, especially in the respiratory tract. The most frequent laboratory abnormalities were altered liver function, neutropenia and elevated cholesterol levels.

Areas covered: The safety of TCZ in the treatment of children with JIA was determined based on a review of published clinical trials, including two multicenter studies of patients with sJIA and pJIA (the TENDER and CHERISH trials, respectively). The frequency of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and deaths reported in these studies was analyzed and discussed.

Expert opinion: TCZ was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of severe forms of sJIA and pJIA, and can be considered a treatment of choice for these conditions. The risk of infections and laboratory abnormalities, such as neutropenia, should be constantly monitored. There is still a need for comparative studies of the risks and benefits of biological agents in patients with refractory JIA.     

Cardiovascular outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis prescribed disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a review

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with a heightened risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), with both traditional CV risk factors and inflammation contributing to this risk.

Areas covered: This review highlights the burden of CVD in RA and associated traditional CV risk factors, including the complexity of dyslipidemia in RA and the so-called ‘lipid paradox.’ Furthermore, the recognized RA-disease-specific factors associated with higher risk of CVD and the role of systemic inflammation in the pathogenesis of CVD in RA will be addressed. With the advent of biologic and targeted synthetic therapies in the treatment of RA, the effect of conventional and newer generation disease modifying anti-rheumatic therapies (DMARDs) on CV risk and associated risk factors will also be discussed.

Expert opinion: Identifying the RA phenotype at greatest risk of CVD, understanding the interplay of increased traditional risk factors, common inflammatory processes and RA-specific factors, and personalized use of DMARDs according to disease phenotype and comorbidity to reduce this risk are key areas for future research.     

Efficacy of baricitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction: although the outcome for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ra) has improved in the past decades, adequate disease control cannot be achieved in a substantial proportion of patients. new drugs with a novel mechanism of action, may represent a valuable addition to the current armamentarium.

Areas covered: This review focuses on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of baricitinib. Furthermore, the article summarizes and comments the drug’s efficacy and safety profile in RA patients.

Expert opinion: Baricitinib is an oral targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) that mainly inhibits JAK1 and JAK2.

Baricitinib monotherapy, or in combination with conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs, has demonstrated its efficacy while having an acceptable safety profile in early active RA naive to DMARDs, and active RA with an inadequate response to csDMARDs and/or biologic (b)DMARDs. The future place of baricitinib in the management of RA patients will depend on several factors. However, baricitinib offer few advantages: oral administration, rapidity of action, efficacy in monotherapy and over adalimumab in one study and non-immunization. However, pending further safety data, current practice would be to start a bDMARD when the treatment target is not achieved with csDMARDs. Availability of additional long-term safety data may influence prescribing decisions.     

The optimal combination therapy for the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune condition traditionally viewed as a severe destructive disease affecting physical health and global wellbeing. The treatment strategies for RA have changed in the last decades from mainly symptomatic towards a more vigorous and targeted approach.

Area covered: Reviewing recent literature enhanced by own expertise and research, a case is made for starting early with an intensive combination treatment with glucocorticoids, followed by a treat to target approach in a tight control setting. Implementation issues that need to be addressed to make optimal use of the ‘window of opportunity’ are highlighted.

Expert opinion: There is strong evidence in favor of traditional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) combined with a remission induction scheme of glucocorticoids to achieve adequate efficacy in controlling early rheumatoid arthritis with good safety and feasibility in daily clinical practice. Furthermore, the most optimal RA treatment should address not only the physician-oriented clinical disease outcomes but also the patient perspective. There is still a need for working on improving implementation of this approach in daily practice in order to provide optimal treatment benefit to more patients.     

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in postoperative pain management

Objective: This meta-analysis was conducted to analyze and compare the efficacy outcomes associated with the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) and morphine intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in the management of postoperative pain.

Research design and methods: This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of the fentanyl ITS versus morphine IV PCA using data from four randomized, active-controlled trials (n = 1271 fentanyl ITS and 1298 morphine IV PCA patients). Main outcome measures were patient global assessment (PGA) of the method of pain control at 24 h.

Results: Fentanyl ITS and morphine IV PCA did not significantly differ regarding ‘good’ and ‘excellent’ ratings on the PGA of the method of pain control at 24 h (odds ratio = 0.95, p = 0.66), however, fentanyl ITS was superior in terms of ‘excellent’ PGA ratings at that time point (odds ratio = 1.53, p < 0.0001). No significant differences were found in weighted mean pain intensity scores at 24, 48 and 72 h.

Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, fentanyl ITS was as efficacious as morphine IV PCA and may offer additional benefits as demonstrated by its ‘excellent’ PGA ratings.     

Anakinra for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a safety evaluation

Introduction: The anti-interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, anakinra, was approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) more than 12 years ago. However, its adverse effects are not well known.

Areas covered: We review the safety profile of anakinra, analyzing clinical trials, observational studies, and registry data.

Expert opinion: Due to its lower efficacy compared with other biological therapies approved for RA and its daily subcutaneous administration, anakinra is used only marginally for the treatment of RA. This has limited the experience with this drug in RA, with a lack of data from long-term observational studies or registries. From the five clinical trials performed, and given the unfeasibility of developing new studies of anakinra in RA, it may be concluded that site injection reactions, infections at higher doses (>100 mg), and immunogenicity are the most frequent adverse events related to anakinra administration.     

Safety of proteasome inhibitors for treatment of multiple myeloma

Introduction: Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) have revolutionized the treatment of multiple myeloma and are a backbone of therapy. Bortezomib, the first PI approved, has shown efficacy in both front-line and relapsed/refractory settings however the development of resistance and side effects such as peripheral neuropathy can limit its use. The second generation PIs carfilzomib and ixazomib, both approved in relapsed/refractory cases, may help to overcome resistance mechanisms and increase tolerability. While bortezomib is approved to be administered intravenously (IV) or subcutaneously (SC) and carfilzomib IV, ixazomib is the first and only approved PI that is orally bioavailable.

Areas covered: This review focuses on the safety data from clinical trials for the three approved PIs and how to manage adverse effects. A summary of efficacy data from select clinical trials is also included.

Expert commentary: Targeting the proteasome/ubiquitin system is a validated and important part of current anti-myeloma therapy. The availability of an oral proteasome inhibitor without significant neuropathy as a side effect offers patients an important step forward over their treatment.     

Clinical trial transparency update: an assessment of the disclosure of results of company-sponsored trials associated with new medicines approved in Europe in 2012

Background:

The objective of this study was to assess the timely disclosure of results of company-sponsored clinical trials related to all new medicines approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) during 2012. This is an extension of the previously reported study of trials related to all new medicines approved in Europe in 2009, 2010 and 2011, which found that over three-quarters of all these trials were disclosed within 12 months and almost 90% were disclosed by the end of the study.

Methods:

The methodology used was exactly as previously reported. Various publicly available information sources were searched for both clinical trial registration and disclosure of results. All completed company-sponsored trials related to each new medicine approved for marketing by the EMA in 2012, carried out in patients and recorded on a clinical trials registry and/or included in an EMA European Public Assessment Report (EPAR), were included. Information sources were searched between 1 May and 31 July 2014.

Outcome measures and results:

The main outcome measure was the proportion of trials for which results had been disclosed on a registry or in the scientific literature either within 12 months of the later of either first regulatory approval or trial completion, or by 31 July 2014 (end of survey). Of the completed trials associated with 23 new medicines licensed to 17 different companies in 2012, results of 90% (307/340) had been disclosed within 12 months, and results of 92% (312/340) had been disclosed by 31 July 2014.

Conclusions:

The disclosure rate within 12 months of 90% suggests the industry is now achieving disclosure in a timely manner more consistently than before. The overall disclosure rate at study end of 92% indicates that the improvement in transparency amongst company-sponsored trials has been maintained in the trials associated with new medicines approved in 2012.     

Influence of route of administration/drug formulation and other factors on adherence to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (pain related) and dyslipidemia (non-pain related)

Objectives: A comprehensive review was performed to investigate the effect of route of administration on medication adherence and persistence in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare adherence/persistence with oral medications between RA and a non-painful disease (dyslipidemia).

Research design and methods: Comprehensive database searches were performed to identify studies investigating medication adherence and/or persistence in adults with RA receiving conventional synthetic or biologic agents. Similar searches were performed for studies of patients with dyslipidemia receiving statins. Studies had to be published after 1998 in English and involve ≥6 months’ follow up.

Main outcome measures: Adherence and persistence were compared between the different routes of drug administration in RA, and between the two diseases for oral medications.

Results: A total of 35 and 28 papers underwent data extraction for RA and dyslipidemia, respectively. Within the constraints of the analysis, adherence and persistence rates appeared broadly similar for the different routes of drug administration in RA. Adherence to oral medications was also broadly similar across the two diseases, but persistence was lower in dyslipidemia. Poor adherence has clinical consequences in both diseases: greater disease activity and risk of flare in RA, and increased serum cholesterol levels and risk of heart and cerebrovascular disease in dyslipidemia. Over 1–3 years, poor adherence to biologic RA medications led to increased resource use and medical costs but lower total direct costs due to reduced biologic drug costs. Conversely, poor adherence to dyslipidemia medications resulted in increased total direct costs. In both diseases, adherence improved with patient education/support.

Conclusions: The route of drug administration and the symptomatic (pain) nature of the disease do not appear to be dominant factors for drug adherence or persistence in RA.

Limitation: The wide range of adherence and persistence values and definitions across studies made comparisons between drug formulations and diseases difficult.     

Successful administration of BI 695501, an adalimumab biosimilar,using an autoinjector (AI): results from a Phase II open-label clinical study (VOLTAIRE®-RL)

Background: This study examined the patient handling experience and self-injection success of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) administering BI 695501 using an AI.

Methods: This Phase II, 7-week, open-label, interventional study (NCT02636907) included adult patients with moderately to severely active RA not adequately controlled by DMARDs, with no experience of self-injecting with AI/pen. Patients self-injected BI 695501 via AI every 2 weeks in the AI Assessment Period (AAP). Training was given on first injection; AI handling events were recorded. Percentage of self-injection success was the primary end point. Patients could enter a 42-week pre-filled syringe (PFS) safety extension.

Results: The AAP was completed by 73/77 patients. In total, 216/218 (99.1%) self-injections on Days 15, 29, and 43, were successful. Nine (11.7%) patients had drug-related adverse events (AEs). Two patients reported four serious AEs (SAEs), none drug-related. Overall (in the AAP and PFS extension), 28 (36.4%) patients had drug-related AEs; nine patients had SAEs, one was considered drug-related. Five (6.5%) patients reported injection-site reactions in the AAP; 13 (18.1%) in the PFS extension.

Conclusions: After training, almost all patients were successfully able to self-administer BI 695501 using an AI. BI 695501 via AI (and via PFS in the extension) was well tolerated.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02636907     

A comparative safety review between GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes treatment

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are of particular interest in type 2 diabetes treatment strategies, due to their efficacy in reducing HbA1c with a low risk of hypoglycaemia, to their positive effects on body weight and blood pressure and in light of their effects on cardiovascular risk and on nephroprotection emerged from the most recent cardiovascular outcome trials.

Since it is therefore very likely that GLP-1RA and SGLT2i use will become more and more common, it is more and more important to gather and discuss information about their safety profile.

Area Covered: adverse events and the safety concerns most often emerged in trials with GLP-1RA namely, exenatide long acting release (LAR), dulaglutide, liraglutide, semaglutide, lixisenatide or SGLT2i, namely empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin and SGLT2i with an attempt at comparing the safety profiles of molecules of these two classes.

Expert opinion: GLP-1RA and SGLT2i, although each associated with different specific side effects, share a ‘similar’ safety profile and are both drugs relatively easy to handle. The potentially complementary mechanisms of action, the cardio and nephroprotective effects demonstrated by molecules of both classes, make these drugs potentially useful even in add on to each other.     

Safety of treatment options for spondyloarthritis: a narrative review

Introduction: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) are chronic inflammatory diseases with overlapping pathogenic mechanisms and clinical features. Treatment armamentarium against SpA includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs, including sulfasalazine, methotrexate, leflunomide, cyclosporine), targeted synthetic DMARDs (apremilast) and biological DMARDs (TNF inhibitors, anti-IL 12/23 and anti-IL-17 agents).

Areas covered: A narrative review of published literature on safety profile of available SpA treatment options was performed. Readers will be provided with a comprehensive overview on frequent and rare adverse events associated with each drug listed in current SpA treatment recommendations.

Expert opinion: The overall safety profile of such molecules is good and serious adverse events are rare but need to be promptly recognized and treated. However, the monitoring of adverse events is a major challenge for clinicians because it is not adequately addressed by current treatment recommendations. A tailored treatment is crucial and rheumatologists must accurately select patients in order to identify those more susceptible to develop adverse events.     

Pharmacological interventions for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a mixed treatment comparison network meta-analysis and a recursive cumulative meta-analysis

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPI), histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA), sucralfate and antacids are the commonly administered agents for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in critically ill patients. The authors of this paper have conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of these agents in SUP.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and conference abstracts for studies comparing a SUP agent in critically ill patients to another active SUP agent or placebo. Overt, occult and clinically significant upper gastro-intestinal (UGI) bleeding, all-cause mortality, pneumonia, gastric colonization and ICU length of stay were considered as the outcome measures. A random effects model was used to generate pooled estimates.

Results: A total of 53 studies (4258 participants) were included. The pooled estimates were in favor of PPI and sucralfate for the overt UGI bleeding. PPI and H2RA bolus were associated with increased risk of gastric colonization and pneumonia.

Conclusions: SUP in critically ill patients was not associated with any benefit with regard to clinically significant bleeding episodes. However, PPI and sucralfate significantly reduces overt UGI bleeding. On the contrary, PPI and H2RA bolus are associated with an increased risk of gastric colonization and pneumonia.     

Risk of elevated transaminases in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis

Background: This meta-analysis has been conducted to determine the risk of elevated transaminases associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors use in patients with cancer.

Methods: Studies eligible for our analysis included randomized Phase II and III trials of patients with cancer on ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, tremelimumab and pidilizumab, which describe events of elevated transaminases [alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)].

Results: Initial database search revealed 210 relevant citations. After excluding noneligible studies, 10 trials were considered eligible for the quantitative synthesis. The RR of all-grade elevated ALT and AST was 2.36 (95% CI 1.20–4.66; p = 0.01) and 1.53 (95% CI 0.73–3.22; p = 0.26), respectively, whereas for high-grade elevated ALT and AST, it was 11.27 (95% CI 5.38–23.63; p < 0.0001) and 4.9 (95% CI 2.97–8.09; p < 0.0001), respectively.

Conclusions: Our study has shown that the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has a causal relationship to an increased risk of high-grade elevated ALT and AST. Clinicians using these agents should be attentive of this risk.     

Prognostic factors for survival following initiation of second-line treatment with everolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: evidence from a nationwide sample of clinical practice in the United States

Objective: Comparing prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in community-practice metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving second-line everolimus with those previously reported in clinical trials.

Research design and methods: Two separate chart sets (2009 – 2012) were used to develop and validate a prognostic model for patients initiating second-line everolimus after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

Main outcome measures: Prognostic factors for OS have been identified and validated in separate samples.

Results: One-year OS probabilities in the study (n = 220) and validation (n = 97) samples were 68 and 67%; median OS was 19 and 23 months – higher than the 1-year OS of 60% and median OS of 14.8 months of RECORD-1. Karnofsky performance score < 80%, duration of mRCC < 1 year, progression on first-line TKI, liver metastasis and clear cell histology were significant prognostic factors for shorter survival. One-year OS estimates were 84% for validation sample patients with 0 – 2 risk factors, 63% for 3 risk factors and 22% for 4 – 5 risk factors (log-rank p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Real-world prognostic factors for OS following second-line everolimus for mRCC were largely consistent with those previously identified in trial data; however, OS was longer in the practice setting than in clinical trials and was not associated with type of first-line TKI.     

A review of tofacitinib efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis patients who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate

Introduction: Tofacitinib is a pan JAK inhibitor with specificity for JAK3 over JAK1 over JAK2, which is approved in many countries for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including the United States and the European Union, either as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-arthritis drugs (csDMARDs). Phase 2, 3 and 4 clinical trials have investigated the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib given either as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARDs.

Areas covered: This review reports the safety, clinical, functional, and radiographic efficacy, of tofacitinib used as monotherapy in the treatment of adult patients with RA reported in the prospective, double-blind, controlled randomized trials reported to date. One critical clinical question is whether tofacitinib monotherapy has similar efficacy as tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate (MTX); this question has recently been addressed. A literature search on tofacitinib monotherapy was carried out using the PubMed database up to July 2017.

Expert opinion: Although tofacitinib plus MTX is statistically more clinically effective, tofacitinib monotherapy is effective in many patients with RA.     

Pharmacotherapy with oral Xa inhibitors for venous thromboembolism

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. The traditional treatment of VTE, with an initial therapy with (low molecular weight) heparin or fondaparinux and a continued treatment with vitamin K antagonists, is effective but has limitations.

Areas covered: The current review summarizes the results of the Phase III trials with the new oral direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban and provides a meta-analysis of these trials in the subgroups of elderly patients (> 75 years) and patients with impaired renal function.

Expert opinion: The practical use of direct Xa inhibitors in the treatment of VTE in general and in specific subgroups is discussed. For elderly patients, patients with extremes of body weight, cancer patients or patients with moderate renal impairment, pooled data suggest that the direct oral Xa inhibitors are a reasonable alternative to standard therapy. For other indications, such as treatment of VTE in children, during pregnancy or in the context of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, further data from clinical trials are needed.     

Safely treating hepatitis C in patients with HIV or hepatitis B virus coinfection

Introduction: There are several clinical trials and prospective studies which support the use of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients. In this review, the safety of DAAs in HCV patients coinfected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or HIV has been evaluated.

Areas covered: All available prospective studies, clinical trials and congress abstracts in the English language that assessed the safety and efficacy of DAAs in HCV coinfections have been considered.

Expert opinion: The newer DAAs in the treatment of HCV/HIV-coinfected patients resolved major limitations of the first-generation protease inhibitors including complex dosing, poor tolerability and interactions with antiretroviral drugs. There are not yet enough data regarding the safety and efficacy of DAAs in some coinfected patients with comorbidities, nor for pregnant, lactating or pediatric patients. Evaluating the safety and efficacy of these agents in these subgroups with HCV coinfection is recommended for future studies. The role of new direct-acting antiviral-based therapy for the treatment of patients with HCV/HBV coinfection remains to be evaluated.     

Overcoming platinum resistance in ovarian cancer treatment: from clinical practice to emerging chemical therapies

Introduction: The objective of this review is to summarize results from clinical trials that tested cytotoxic drugs and target strategies for the treatment of platinum resistant (PR) recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) with particular attention to Phase III and ongoing trials.

Areas covered: Since platinum free interval (PFI) represents the most important predictive factor for response to platinum re-treatment in ROC, non-platinum regimens are conventionally considered the most appropriate approaches.

Impressive progress has been made in recent decades, resulting in the identification of most effective cytotoxic agents and in the development of new target strategies.

However, the efficacy of most of these drugs for the treatment of PR disease is still limited.

Expert opinion: The most favorable benefit for the treatment of PR disease, has been described by the AURELIA trial that showed a 3.3 months increase in progression free survival (PFS) when bevacizumab was combined with non-platinum single agent chemotherapy in bevacizumab-naïve patients.

Nevertheless, the use of novel agents is associated to important costs for just little gains in survival.

Thus, in our opinion the economic evaluation, such as the incorporation of quality of life into the clinical studies is crucial for the development of future trials for PR-ROC.