Comparison between navigated reported position and postoperative computed tomography to evaluate accuracy in a robotic navigation system in total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundComputer navigation increases reproducibility compared to non-navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Robotics navigation is a branch of computer navigation technology that might further improve accuracy of implant placement. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy achieved in TKA with a robotic navigation system.MethodsOne hundred seventy three knees. System studied: Omni navigation System (OMNI, Raynham, MA). Navigated femoral and tibial cuts were compared to postoperative computed tomography (CT). Measurements reviewed: femoral coronal alignment (FCA), femoral sagittal alignment (FSA), femoral rotational alignment (FRA), tibial coronal alignment (TCA), tibial sagittal alignment (TSA) and hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle. Statistical analysis was made using R.ResultsThe mean differences between the navigated reported and the CT positions were: FCA: 0.1 ± 1.2° more varus (P = 0.58), FSA: 1.5 ± 0.3° more flexed (P < 0.001), FRA: 0.0 ± 1.7° (P = 0.93), TCA: 0.7 ± 1.1° more varus (P < 0.001), TSA: − 1.3 ± 1.5 more negative slope (P < 0.001), HKA angle: 0.4 ± 2.4 more varus (P < 0.049).The percentages of concordance inside a three degree difference were: FCA: 98% (169 knees), FSA: 100% (173 knees), FRA: 94% (162 knees), TCA: 99% (171 knees), TSA: 93% (161 knees) and HKA angle: 83% (144 knees).ConclusionsThe current study showed that the robotic navigation system studied is highly accurate regarding final implant positioning for FCA, FRA and TCA. It has less accuracy in FSA, TSA and the HKA angle.     

Can total knee arthroplasty restore the correlation between radiographic mechanical axis angle and dynamic coronal plane alignment during gait?

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the treatment of choice for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Postoperative static knee alignment has been recognized as a key component of successful surgery. A correction toward the kinematics of a native knee is expected after TKA, with an aim for neutral mechanical alignment. The evolution of frontal plane knee kinematics is not well understood.MethodsNineteen patients awaiting TKA were recruited. Three-dimensional knee kinematics during treadmill gait were assessed pre-operatively, 12 months after surgery, and compared to a control group of 17 asymptomatic participants.ResultsMean radiographic mechanical alignment was corrected from 5.4° ± 5.0 (Standard Deviation) varus pre-operatively to 0.1° ± 2.0 (Standard Deviation) valgus postoperatively (P = 0.002). Mean stance coronal plane alignment decreased from 6.7° ± 4.0 (Standard Deviation) varus per-operatively to 2.1° ± 3.8 (Standard Deviation) postoperatively (P = 0.001). Correlation between radiographic mechanical axis angle and dynamic frontal plane alignment during gait, before and after surgery, was weak (pre-operative R = 0.41; postoperative R = 0.13) compared to control (R = 0.88). In the sagittal plane, TKA patients maintained their pre-operative stiff knee gait adaptation. Postoperative transverse plane kinematics suggested restoration of external tibial rotation during swing after TKA compared to control (Pre-operative 3.1°, postoperative 6.8°, control 7.1°, P = 0.05).ConclusionThe lack of correlation between static and dynamic alignment suggests that static radiographic coronal alignment of the knee does not accurately predict dynamic behavior. In the sagittal plane, pre-operative gait adaptations were still present 12 months after surgery, supporting the need for a functional assessment to guide postoperative rehabilitation following TKA.     

Surgical epicondylar axis is not orthogonal to the femoral mechanical knee axis in valgus knees with primary osteoarthritis: Three-dimensional analysis according to knee coronal alignment in 112 patients

BackgroundDuring total knee arthroplasty (TKA), most surgeons align the femoral component along the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) considering it as orthogonal to the femoral mechanical axis. However, it is still unclear how SEA coronal alignment varies according to the native coronal knee alignment. The main goal of this study was to analyze the SEA orientation according to the native coronal knee morphotype.MethodsA total of 112 patients underwent a three-dimensional (3D) -planning-based TKA. The SEA was then determined by locating the epicondyles on 3D models. The 3D femoral and tibial mechanical axes were marked and the femoral (FMA) and tibial (TMA) mechanical angles were measured. The native HKA angle was measured as FMA + TMA. The SEA orientation angles were measured in the coronal (SEA-α) and axial (SEA-β) plane. SEA orientation was compared between the valgus, neutral, and varus knees.ResultsThe mean SEA-α angle was 90.2 ± 3° and the mean axial SEA-β angle was 92.2 ± 1.3°. The SEA-α angle was significantly higher in the valgus group compared with the neutral group (92.3 ± 2.9°, 90 ± 2.9°, P = 0.0009) whereas there was no significant difference in the SEA-α angle between the varus and the neutral group (89.7 ± 2.3°, 90 ± 2.9°, P = 0.32).ConclusionsIn contrast to the neutral and varus knees, the SEA was not orthogonal to the femoral mechanical axis in patients undergoing TKA for primary osteoarthritis. Our results suggest adapting the coronal alignment of the femoral component during TKA, while maintaining an average 2° valgus in valgus knees. By contrast, with varus and neutral knees, our data support the use of a mechanical alignment.     

Relationships between the changes in flexion contracture and standing flexion angle of the knee and sagittal spinal alignment after total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundThe sagittal spinal alignment interacts with the lower extremity in patients with combined degenerative disease of the spine and lower extremity. This study aimed to clarify the relationships between the reciprocal changes in sagittal alignment of the knee, pelvis, and spine after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in osteoarthritis patients.MethodsProspectively, 36 patients who underwent primary TKA for severe knee osteoarthritis were enrolled. Their clinical and radiological evaluation included assessments of the knee flexion contracture (KFC) and standing knee flexion angle (KFA), as well as spinopelvic parameters and the global sagittal spinal alignment from standing whole-lower-extremity and whole-spine radiographs preoperatively and at postoperative 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Linear mixed models were used to assess the relationships between KFC/KFA and between spinopelvic/global sagittal spinal alignments.ResultsThe KFC decreased abruptly immediately after TKA, and the correction was maintained for 2 years postoperatively. The KFA decreased gradually and approached the value of the KFC after 2 years. Of the spinopelvic parameters, sacral slope and pelvic incidence decreased significantly, in ways related to changes in KFA. There was no significant relationship between sagittal spinal alignment and postoperative changes in KFC.ConclusionAlthough the flexion contracture was corrected immediately after TKA, the standing KFA improved gradually over 2 years. The pelvic parameters showed compensatory changes according to the KFA. The decompensated sagittal spinal malalignment was not related to a relapse in flexion contracture.     

Accuracy of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundAccuracy of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant placement and overall limb are important goals of TKA technique.MethodsThe accuracy and ease of use of an accelerometer-based hand-held navigation system for tibial resection during TKA was examined in 90 patients. Preoperative goals for sagittal alignment, navigation system assembly time, resection time, and tourniquet time were evaluated. Coronal and sagittal alignment was measured postoperatively.ResultsThe average coronal tibial component alignment was 0.43° valgus; 6.7% of patients had tibial coronal alignment outside of ± 3° varus/valgus. The difference between the intraoperative goal and radiographically measured posterior tibial slope was 0.5°. The average time to completion of the tibial cut was 4.6 minutes.ConclusionThe accelerometer-based hand-held navigation system was accurate for tibial coronal and sagittal alignment during TKA, with no additional surgical time compared with conventional instrumentation.     

Rotational kinematics differ between mild and severe valgus knees in total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundThere is no consensus regarding femorotibial rotational kinematics in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for valgus knee deformity. Additionally, whether the degree of valgus deformity influences intraoperative rotational kinematics and postoperative clinical scores remains unclear. The objectives of this study were to investigate whether the valgus angle is associated with intraoperative rotational kinematics in TKA for valgus knee deformity and to examine the relationship between rotational kinematics and postoperative clinical results.Materials and methodsA total of 24 knees with valgus deformity for TKA were included in this study and were divided into two groups depending on the femorotibial angle (FTA); there were 11 knees in the severe valgus group (FTA < 160°) and 13 knees in the mild valgus group (FTA ≥ 160°). Intraoperative femorotibial rotational kinematics from knee extension to flexion were evaluated using an image-free navigation system and postoperative clinical results (range of motion and subjective outcomes) were evaluated 1 year postoperatively. All parameters were compared between the two groups.ResultMild valgus knee showed tibial internal rotation during knee flexion before implantation, whereas severe valgus knee showed tibial external rotation during knee flexion before implantation. The postoperative flexion angle was positively correlated with the tibial internal rotation angle after implantation in the mild valgus group only.ConclusionIntraoperative rotational kinematics before implantation differed between mild and severe valgus knee deformity in TKA. Intraoperative tibial rotation influenced the postoperative knee flexion angle in mild, but not severe, valgus knee deformity. Ideal postoperative rotational kinematics may be different between the two groups and the difference may be taken into consideration in implant selections and surgical techniques.     

Limb and component alignment after total knee arthroplasty comparing 28 consecutive iAssist and 28 conventional TKAs: A prospective study

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to assess limb and component alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on long leg X-rays and to compare the use of iAssist, an accelerometric based computer-assisted device (CAD), with conventional jigs.MethodsWe prospectively recruited 56 consecutive patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA by a single surgeon into this study. In the first 28 patients iAssist navigation system was utilized and in the following 28 conventional jigs were used. The groups were comparable with regard to age, sex distribution, body mass index and preoperative hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle. Our aim was to restore neutral coronal alignment and a five degree tibial slope.ResultsThe mean postoperative mechanical axis was 179.4° in the CAD group and 180.1° in the conventional group (P = 0.187). There were five TKAs deviating more than three degrees from neutral (18.5%) in the conventional group and none in the CAD group (P = 0.051). The mean femoral mechanical-condyles-angle was significantly closer (P < 0.001) to our target of 90° in the conventional group but contained more outliers (P = 0.67). The sagittal tibial slope was closer (P = 0.047) to our target of 85° in CAD-navigated TKAs with fewer outliers (P < 0.0001). The Oxford Knee Score showed comparable (P = 0.271) and good clinical outcome in both groups. The mean operation time was significantly longer in the CAD group (P < 0.001).ConclusionsThis study shows that the use of iAssist accelerometric CAD facilitates comparable good leg alignment after TKA in the frontal plane and more accurate tibial slope with fewer outliers in the sagittal plane compared with a conventional technique. Our operation time was longer with CAD.     

The effect of component alignment on clinical outcomes in fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to report component alignment in a series of ZUK fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) implants and compare this to clinical outcomes.MethodsThe radiographs, Knee Society Scores (KSS) and knee flexion of 223 medial UKAs were evaluated. The following alignment parameters were assessed; coronal and sagittal femoral component angle (c-FCA and s-FCA), coronal and sagittal tibia component angle (c-TCA and s-TCA) and the coronal tibiofemoral angle (c-TFA). Each alignment parameter was grouped at consecutive 2.5° intervals, mean KSS and knee flexion was then compared between the interval groups.Results96.4% of femoral components were between 7.5° of varus and valgus and 95.1% between 7.5° extension and 5° flexion. 89.6% of tibial components were between 7.5° of varus and 2.5° valgus and 97.3% between 2.5° and 15° flexion. There was no significant difference between the KSS or knee flexion between any of the incremental groups of component alignment. Mean c-TFA was 0.2 ± 3.0°, 92.4% were between −5° (varus) and 5° (valgus). KSS were significantly greater for two of the increments with slightly more varus. Linear regression analysis showed there was very weak correlation (R² = 0.1933) between c-TFA and c-TCA.ConclusionsThe results of this study show that fixed bearing UKA components are forgiving to accommodate some variation in tibial and femoral component position without effecting clinical outcome scores or knee flexion. Limb alignment matters more than component position and knees with slight varus tibiofemoral alignment have better clinical scores than those with valgus.     

Association of knee flexion angle after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty with postoperative tibial external position relative to the femur and the extent of tibial internal rotation from knee extension to flexion

BackgroundThis study evaluated the relationship between preoperative and postoperative knee kinematics, moreover, investigated tibial rotational position and the extent of tibial internal rotation from knee extension to flexion as factors to obtain significant knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsFifty-four patients (60 knees total; 15 males, 16 knees; 39 females, 44 knees) who underwent posterior-stabilized TKA using a navigation system were included. Intraoperative knee kinematics involving tibial rotational position relative to the femur and the extent of tibial internal rotation were examined at two time points: 1) after landmarks registration (pre-TKA) and 2) after skin closure (post-TKA). The relationship between the knee flexion angle at one year postoperatively and intraoperative tibial rotational position, or the extent of tibial rotation among several knee flexion angles calculated with a navigation system were investigated.ResultsThe postoperative knee flexion angle was positively associated with the preoperative flexion angle and intraoperative knee kinematics at post-TKA involving tibial external position relative to the femur at knee extension and the extent of tibial internal rotation from extension to 90° of flexion or to maximum flexion. There was a positive relationship between the extent of tibial internal rotation at pre-TKA and that at post-TKA.ConclusionsThe intraoperative kinematics of the extent of tibial internal rotation at post-TKA was influenced by that at pre-TKA. The greater external position of the tibia relative to the femur at knee extension and the greater extent of tibial internal rotation at post-TKA might lead to good knee flexion angle.     

The medial gap is a reliable indicator for intraoperative soft tissue balancing in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundAppropriate soft tissue balance and accurate alignment are important for successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal technique for establishing and measuring soft tissue balancing remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the intraoperative medial and lateral gap pattern using digital knee balancer in posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA.MethodsThis study involved 55 patients with medial osteoarthritis who underwent a primary TKA using an image-free navigation system. The extension gap and the flexion gap at 90° knee flexion were assessed using an offset seesaw-type digital balancer. Continuous joint distraction force from 10 lb to 60 lb was applied. Medial gap, lateral gap, and varus angle were measured.ResultsThe medial bone gap difference between extension and flexion was constant regardless of the distraction force from 20 lb to 60 lb. The lateral bone gap was significantly greater than the medial bone gap in extension and flexion from 30 lb to 60 lb (P < 0.05). The varus angle changed depending on the distraction force, especially in flexion. The varus angle in flexion was significantly greater than that in extension from 40 lb to 60 lb (P < 0.05).ConclusionsThe medial bone gap is a reliable indicator unaffected by the distraction force during surgery and is useful for adjusting the medial gap in extension and flexion appropriately to ensure medial stability in PS-TKA. The digital knee balancer and navigation system support both precise gap assessment and surgery.     

Conventional knee films hamper accurate knee alignment determination in patients with varus osteoarthritis of the knee

Surgical therapeutic procedures such as knee osteotomy and knee replacement depend on proper knee alignment assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate if femorotibial (FT) measurement on short knee films may be used in clinical settings. The study population comprised 68 patients with symptomatic medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis. We measured the FT angle with the use of mid-diaphyseal lines (FTa), and the knee joint centre (FTb) to determine anatomical knee alignment on a short knee image. Then, the accuracy of alignment was compared to the gold standard Hip–Knee–Ankle (HKA) angle on a full-limb view. FTa angle assessment correlated well (r = 0.65) with the HKA angle. However, this method showed poor inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.37). 3% of patients were incorrectly classified as having valgus alignment. Good intra- and inter-observer agreements were observed for FTb angle measurement (ICC = 0.89 and 0.79; respectively). But correlation between HKA and FTb angles was low (r = 0.34). 15% of patients were incorrectly classified as having valgus alignment. Short knee images cannot substitute whole leg views when accurate assessment of knee alignment is essential.     

Radiographic outcome of limb-based versus knee-based patient specific guides in total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundPatient specific guides (PSG's) were developed to improve overall component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to undertake a comparative radiographic study of two commonly used PSG and determine whether the radiographic technique used to construct the PSG had a significant effect on overall alignment.MethodsThis prospective cohort study examined the accuracy of limb-based (n = 112) versus knee-based (n = 105) MR PSG in restoring the mechanical axis in three planes according to post-operative Perth CT scan protocol.ResultsLimb-based MR and knee-based MR PSG systems both restored overall hip–knee–ankle angle (HKAA), femoral coronal alignment, tibial coronal alignment, femoral sagittal alignment, tibial sagittal alignment and femoral rotation alignment to within 3° of a neutral mechanical axis with similar precision (91.1% vs. 86.7% p = 0.30, 97.3% vs. 96.2% p = 0.63, 97.3% vs. 97.1% p = 0.94, 94.6% vs. 89.4% p = 0.16, 90.2% vs. 81.0% p = 0.05, 91.1% vs. 86.7% p = 0.30, respectively). However, when the secondary outcome measure of alignment within 2° was assessed, limb-based MR PSG restored HKAA, femoral coronal and tibial sagittal alignment with greater precision than knee-based MR PSG (73.2% vs. 64.8% p = 0.016, 93.8% vs. 80.8% p = 0.004 and 82.1% vs. 62.9% p = 0.001, respectively).ConclusionsThe findings of this study recommend the use of limb-based MR PSG for improved precision in the restoration of neutral mechanical alignment over knee-based MR PSG in TKA.Level of EvidenceTherapeutic level III     

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves the outlier of rotational alignment of the tibial prosthesis using 3DCT measurements

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of prosthetic alignment with three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) measurements following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed using a robotic-assisted surgical technique versus a conventional TKA.Methods41 TKAs were performed with a handheld robotic-assisted surgical procedure (Robot group) between 2019 and 2020. Another 41 patients underwent TKA with a conventional manual surgical procedure (Manual group) using the same prosthesis. The operation durations between both groups were investigated. 3DCT scans of the entire lower extremities were taken before and after the surgery and femoral and tibial alignments in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes were measured using computer software. The differences in prosthetic alignment and translation between the preoperative 3DCT plan and postoperative 3DCT image were also measured.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences in the post-operative outliers of the femorotibial angle between the groups. In the tibial-axial plane, the mean of prosthetic alignment in the anteroposterior plane was 4.0° in the Robot group and 6.7° in the Manual group (p < 0.01). The rate of outliers for tibial-axial alignment in the Robot group was significantly less than in the Manual group (p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in prosthetic translation in the proximal-distal, anterior-posterior and medial-lateral orientations between the groups.ConclusionsIn a radiologic study using 3DCT, robotic-assisted TKA reduced the outliers for rotational alignment of the tibial prosthesis in comparison to conventional TKA, which can lead to improved tracking of the femoral-tibial bearing surfaces.     

Intra- and interobserver reliability and agreement in three-dimensional computed tomography measurements of component positions after total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundAccurate evaluation of the postoperative position of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components is crucial in the analysis of the association of alignments with clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of measurements of component positions after TKA using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) reconstruction.MethodsTwo independent orthopedic surgeons (an attending surgeon and a fellow) examined 30 knees after primary TKA. The coronal, sagittal, and rotational positions of the femoral and tibial components were measured twice at an interval of six weeks on 3D-CT images reconstructed using ZedKnee software. Mean intra- and interobserver differences of measured angles were calculated, and the intra- and interobserver reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), with agreement assessed by Bland–Altman analysis.ResultsThe mean intraobserver difference between alignment measurements for femoral and tibial components was < 2° (range 0.23–1.17°) and the mean interobserver difference was < 1° (range 0.22–0.97°). The intra- and interobserver ICCs were > 0.8 for all component positions. The only systematic bias found in the intra- and interobserver agreements occurred for the sagittal position of the femoral component.ConclusionThree-dimensional-CT measurements of component positions after TKA showed good intra- and interobserver reliability for the femoral and tibial components in coronal, sagittal and rotational positions. The intra- and interobserver agreements were favorable for all but the sagittal position of the femur. These results suggest that 3D-CT can be used to evaluate the alignment of all TKA components except for the sagittal position of the femur.     

A comparison of alignment using patient specific guides,computer navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundPatient specific guides (PSG) have been introduced as a tool in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in an attempt to improve limb alignment and reduce operative time compared to other established surgical techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the post-operative radiographic alignment and operative time in patients who underwent TKA surgery with PSG, conventional instrumentation or computer-assisted navigation surgery using fully cemented components.MethodsA cohort of 260 patients who underwent TKA surgery using PSG (PSG group, n = 115) was compared to patients who underwent TKA using either conventional instrumentation (CON group, n = 92) or computer-assisted navigation (CAS group, n = 53). Post-operative CT imaging using the Perth CT protocol was used to compare alignment between the three groups.ResultsIn the PSG and CAS groups, the post-operative hip–knee angle (HKA) was within 3° of neutral alignment in 91.3% and 90.7% of patients, respectively. This compared to 80.4% of patients in the CON group (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences with respect to alignment when comparing individual component positioning between the PSG and CAS groups apart from tibial slope (Table 3). Total operative time was found to be significantly reduced in the PSG group (80.2 min) compared to both the CON group (86 min, p = 0.002) and the CAS group (110.2 min, p < 0.0001).ConclusionsThe use of PSG resulted in similar alignment accuracy to CAS and superior alignment to CON with significantly shorter operative times.     

Comparison of intraoperative kinematics and their influence on the clinical outcomes between posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty and bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundOf all the intraoperative kinematic parameters recorded using navigation systems, femorotibial rotational alignment is reportedly associated with the clinical outcomes of cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, to our knowledge, there are no reports on the relationship of newly designed bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA and intraoperative rotational kinematics. We aimed to clarify and compare the relationships between the intraoperative kinematics and clinical outcomes of BCS TKA and PS TKA.MethodsWe compared the intraoperative rotational kinematics and clinical outcomes at two years postoperatively of 56 BCS TKA patients and 55 PS TKA patients. Further, we evaluated the relationship between the femorotibial rotational kinematics and clinical outcomes.ResultsThe maximum flexion angle and the pain subscale of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in BCS TKA were significantly better than those in PS TKA. The intraoperative kinematic data of BCS TKA showed “screw-home” movement, while that of PS TKA did not show this movement. The rotational angular differences between at maximum flexion angle and at 60° flexion of BCS TKA showed positive correlations with the improvement of KOOS pain, symptom, activity of daily living and sports subscales. The rotational angular differences between at maximum flexion angle and at 30° flexion in PS TKA showed positive correlations with the maximum flexion angle.ConclusionIntraoperative femorotibial rotational kinematics and its influence on the clinical outcomes were different between BCS and PS TKA. BCS TKA showed more normal-like kinematics and better clinical results than PS TKA.     

Interobserver agreement of sensor-derived compartmental pressure measurements in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundSensor-guided compartmental pressure measurements are becoming increasingly utilized in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to objectively confirm intraoperative knee balance. We aimed to determine agreement of pressure measurements between two observers when performing sensor-guided TKA with the use of computer-assisted surgery (CAS).MethodsOne-hundred and eighteen consecutive patients undergoing 130 TKAs were analysed. Femoral and tibial trial implants were inserted prior to performing knee balancing. We compared the reliability of sensor pressure compartmental measurements between two observers at 10, 45 and 90° of flexion using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates and the 95% limits of agreement (Bland–Altman plots).ResultsThe interobserver agreement between sensor pressure measurements was excellent at 10° of knee flexion, with ICCs of 0.93 and 0.91 in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively (P < 0.001). At 45°, medial and lateral compartment ICCs were 0.91 and 0.76, respectively (P < 0.001). At 90°, the ICC was 0.88 medially and 0.76 laterally (P < 0.001). Although the agreement decreased at higher knee flexion, it remained good to excellent. The 95% limits of agreement at each angle were all within 20 psi and 11 psi for the medial and lateral compartments, respectively.ConclusionsThere was excellent interobserver agreement of sensor pressure measurements at 10° of knee flexion with computer-assisted TKA. Interobserver agreement decreased slightly as knee flexion angles increased, particularly in the lateral compartment. It is likely that interobserver agreement and hence reliability of sensor pressure measurements in TKA has some dependence on accurate angular positioning of the knee.     

False malalignment after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundAlthough computer navigation has improved component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), radiographic outliers are reported with a wide range in literature even using this technique. We hypothesized that the postoperative malalignment after computer-navigated TKA was partially derived from the inherent problems with two-dimensional (2D) measurement such as inaccuracies in measurement due to the knee position during the radiographic examination and the direction of the X-ray beam. We therefore conducted this study to determine how often knees with malalignment on 2D imaging were truly mal-aligned on three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed imaging.MethodsSixty-two computer-navigated primary TKAs performed in 47 patients were included in this study. In all cases, a weight-bearing long-leg radiograph was obtained after TKA. 3D measurements were performed for outliers 2° or more in coronal alignment of the femoral or tibial component.ResultsFor the 18 femoral mal-aligned components on 2D imaging, eight (44.4%) were not truly mal-aligned on 3D imaging (P = 0.0014). For the eight tibial mal-aligned components on 2D imaging, all knees (100%) were not truly mal-aligned on 3D imaging (P < 0.0001).ConclusionsA considerable number of the false malalignments were included on 2D measurement. Postoperative component alignment in the computer-navigated TKA might be much better than previously reported.     

Patellar resurfacing has minimal impact on in vitro tibiofemoral kinematics during deep knee flexion in total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundWhile patellar resurfacing can affect patellofemoral kinematics, the effect on tibiofemoral kinematics is unknown. We hypothesized that patellar resurfacing would affect tibiofemoral kinematics during deep knee flexion due to biomechanical alteration of the extensor mechanism.MethodsWe performed cruciate-retaining TKA in fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees (N = 5) and recorded fluoroscopic kinematics during deep knee flexion before and after the patellar resurfacing. To simulate deep knee flexion, cadaver knees were tested on a dynamic, quadriceps-driven, closed-kinetic chain simulator based on the Oxford knee rig design under loads equivalent to stair climbing. To measure knee kinematics, a 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional fluoroscopic registration technique was used. Component rotation, varus-valgus angle, and anteroposterior translation of medial and lateral contact points of the femoral component relative to the tibial component were calculated over the range of flexion.ResultsThere were no significant differences in femoral component external rotation (before patellar resurfacing: 6.6 ± 2.3°, after patellar resurfacing: 7.2 ± 1.8°, p = 0.36), and less than 1° difference in femorotibial varus-valgus angle between patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing (p = 0.01). For both conditions, the medial and lateral femorotibial contact points moved posteriorly from 0° to 30° of flexion, but not beyond 30° of flexion. At 10° of flexion, after patellar resurfacing, the medial contact point was more anteriorly located than before patellar resurfacing.ConclusionDespite the potential for alteration of the knee extensor biomechanics, patellar resurfacing had minimal effect on tibiofemoral kinematics. Patellar resurfacing, if performed adequately, is unlikely to affect postoperative knee function.