Studies of new short-period method for delayed contact hypersensitivity assay in the guinea pig

The enhancement effect of cyclophosphamide on the delayed contact hypersensitivity reaction of chemical compounds was studied in Hartley albino guinea pigs. A series of assay procedures. combining the AP2 test (adjuvant and 24-h occlusive patch 2× test, as previously reported) with intraperitoneal cyclophosphamide administration, were examined. The newly developed method was as follows; cyclophosphamide 200 mg/kg intraperitoneal administration 3 days before the 1st sensitization of the AP2 test (cyclophosphamide. adjuvant and 24-h occlusive patch 2× test: CAP2 test). Comparing the CAP2 test with the AP2 test, the cumulative contact enhancement test (CCET) and the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT), the CAP2 test equally and/or better enabled the detection of allergenicities not only of strong allergens such as bromostyrol, citronellal, p -phenylendediamine and formaldehyde, but also of weak allergens such as benzyl salicylate and p -aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester. Acanthosis and spongiosis in the epidermis and mononuclear cell infiltration into the dennis at the skin reaction site were histopathologically observed. Cyclophosphamide effectively enhanced the delayed contact hypersensitivity reaction of weak allergens.     

Modified short-term guinea pig sensitization tests for detecting contact allergens as an alternative to the conventional test

The conventional adjuvant and patch test (APT) method of guinea pig sensitization testing was modified in 2 ways, s-APT and s-APT(2), in order to shorten the test period. These short-term test methods consist of 72-h closed application of test material with intradermal injection of emulsified Freund's complete adjuvant (E-FCA) for 1st induction, 48-h closed application of test material with (s-APT) or without (s-APT(2)) intradermal injection of E-FCA on the 7th day for 2nd induction, and open application on the 14th day for challenge. They were compared with conventional APT by using 8 allergenic chemicals (formaldehyde, nickel sulfate, cobalt sulfate, ethyl-p-aminobenzoate (benzocaine), isoeugenol, 2-mercaptobenzothiazole, 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) and 1-phenylazo-2-naphthol (Sudan I)). The short-term methods gave similar results to those of conventional APT in terms of mean response, sensitization rate and sensitization potency (challenge concentration that induces a mean response equal to 1.0). Thus, our short-term methods, which are capable of evaluating skin sensitization within 17 days, are sufficiently sensitive to detect potentially hazardous contact allergens.     

How sensitizing is chlorocresol?

Chlorocresol is a biocide with widespread use in industry and pharmaceutical products. It is an occasional human contact sensitizer. The sensitizing potential of chlorocresol was judged strong using the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) and doubtful in the less sensitive open epicutaneous test (OET). When different induction concentrations were used, the results indicated an optimal sensitizing concentration above which no further increase in the sensitization rate occurred. Rechallenge 2 weeks later showed a marked decrease in sensitivity. Consecutive human patch tests with chlorocresol 2% in pet. showed 11 reactions among 1462 patients tested, but none were explainable and reproducible during re-tests and provocative use tests, indicating that the GPMT overestimated the sensitization potential. The results from guinea pig allergy tests cannot stand alone but have to be validated by other sources of information.     

Experimental contact sensitization with 3,4,5-trichloropyridazine

The potential of 3,4,5-trichloropyridazine to induce contact sensitization was assessed in the guinea pig maximization test of Magnusson and Kligman and also in the closed patch test described by Buehler. The test material was a 1% solution of 3,4,5-trichloropyridazine in a highly refined mineral oil. The test material elicited moderate to severe irritation when diluted in mineral oil to concentrations of 15-25% and minimal irritation at concentrations of 1-3%. Both tests clearly indicated that 3,4,5-trichloropyridazine was a contact sensitizer to guinea pigs, although the response was stronger in the maximization test. Sensitization was distinguished from irritation by the use of concurrent irritation control groups.     

Cross-reactivity patterns of palladium and nickel studied by repeated open applications (ROATs) to the skin of guinea pigs

Cross-reactivity is usually studied with patch test techniques, but the relevance of a single 1-2 day exposure under occlusion can be questioned. To study relevance, animals were induced with PdCl2 or NiSO4 according to the guinea pig maximization test method and then treated for 10 days according to the repeated open application test (ROAT) method. Animals induced with PdCl2 reacted in the ROATs to PdCl2 (100%) but rarely to NiSO4. Animals induced with NiSO4 reacted in ROATs to the same degree with NiSO4 and PdCl2 (23-30%). The concordance between pre-ROAT patch test results and ROAT outcome was high for PdCl2 (100%) and low (10-40%) for NiSO4. Patch testing seems to overestimate the risk of skin reactions when guinea pigs sensitive to PdCl2 are treated topically with NiSO4. The finding from patch test studies that animals induced with NiSO4 react only to NiSO4 but not to PdCl2 was not confirmed. Repeated open applications more adequately mimic exposure conditions than does patch testing.     

Dose-response studies of contact allergens using 3 guinea pig models

A multi-dose-response induction protocol for the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT), including a statistical computer program, has earlier been developed to improve the power of predictive tests for identification of contact allergens. This dose-response protocol, with 2 modifications (i.e., increased number of animals in each group and increased number of challenge concentrations) was evaluated in the GPMT, the cumulative contact enhancement test (CCET) and the Freund's complete adjuvant test (FCAT), using potassium dichromate and hydroxycitronellal as model contact allergens. Application of the dose-response protocol on the CCET and the FCAT resulted in either monotone or non-monotone curves with significant dose-response. However, application of the dose-response protocol on the GPMT gave curves with no significant dose-response. The protocol makes it possible to obtain an EC50 value, thus improving the possibility of ranking contact allergens, which is of substantial use for risk assessments. The dose-response protocol could benefit from a few adjustments: a wider span in the induction doses; change to simultaneous increase in intradermal and topical induction doses to obtain a proper dose-response for the GPMT; the addition of further challenge concentrations. In addition the computer program should allow calculation of threshold concentration for sensitization and EC50 value for a non-monotone curve.     

A modified technique of guinea pig testing to identify delayed hypersensitivity allergens

A modified guinea pig testing technique was developed For the detection of weak allergens and allergenicity of materials unsuitable for testing by intradermal injection. This test involved the use of Freund's complete adjuvant to stimulate the immune system of the animal, and external application instead of intradermal injection of the test compound in the induction stage. The allergenicity of Sudan III, Brilliant Lake Red R and Sudan I was tested by this procedure.
In the dose-effect study of Sudan I, the dose dependency of a positive reaction of the induction and challenge concentrations was recognised.
The test was compared with three other guinea pig sensitization tests. The results obtained with this test correlated well with those obtained with the guinea pig maximization test.     

Sulphanilic acid: divergent results in the guinea pig maximization test and the local lymph node assay

The guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) has proven to be a valuable tool for the identification of the skin sensitization potential of chemicals. The method identifies a hazard which can lead in the EC to compulsory labelling of that chemical. In the present study, data on sulphanilic acid derived from the GPMT has been compared with results from a second guinea pig assay (the cumulative contact enhancement test) and the murine local lymph node assay, both of which require only topical application of chemical. Except for the GPMT, no test identified any sensitizing activity associated with exposure to sulphanilic acid. These latter results are consistent with the experience gained from substantial human exposure in an occupational setting and from which no cases of allergic contact dermatitis to sulphanilic acid have arisen over a 20-year period. In consequence, it is questioned which test protocol in practice has given the more accurate identification of sensitization hazard relevant to man.     

Identification of contact sensitizers by animal assay

Guinea pig testing constitutes the first step in evaluating the allergenicity of new chemicals and products. Some of the most commonly used animal predictive tests are reviewed. The guinea pig maximization test, which is the recommended test method in Sweden, is described in detail and the interpretation of results obtained with this test is discussed. In the guinea pig maximization test the sensitization capacity of a substance is examined by the use of maximized conditions for i he exposure, i.e. the potential ability of the material to induce a contact allergy is determined. The extent to which an allergen causes contact dermatitis in exposed persons depends on the mode of use and various environmental factors.     

The guinea pig as a model for predicting photoallergic contact dermatitis

This report describes modifications in the techniques used for both the induction and elicitation of photoallergic contact dermatitis (PACD) in the guinea pig. These changes have improved the reliability of this animal as the model of choice for screening chemicals or products for (heir tendency to produce PACD.
The induction period consists of 15 exposures of the test substance to shoulder skin that has been abraded with a nylon brush rotating at 13,000 rpm. One hour later, the KM site is irradiated with broadband UVA from a source having some irradiance below 320 nm (UVA/b). The animals receive 450 J/cm² of UVA during the three-week induction period. The elicitation (challenge) test is repeated fur two consecutive days. Each day, the test material, if a liquid, is applied to two sties even 30 lo 60 min for 6 h; then one of the sites receives 20 J/cm² of UVA.
These photo-induction and photo-elicitation procedures have demonstrated that low-level concentrations (0.25% range) of 6-melhyl coumarin or musk ambrette will both induce and elicit PACD in the guinea pig. This report adds more evidence that the induction of PACD in the guinea pig is dependent on broadband UVA.     

Studies on the contact sensitizing activity of dithranol (anthralin) and 10-butyryl dithranol (butantrone)

The contact sensitizing activity of dithranol and butantrone (10-butyryl dithranol) was studied in 3 animal models: the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT), the closed patch test (CPT), and the mouse ear swelling test (MEST) in 2 different mouse strains. In the GPMT, both dithranol and, to a greater extent, butantrone showed sensitizing potential. Because butantrone was less irritant, the concentrations used were 10x higher than those of dithranol. In the CPT, only butantrone was slightly positive. In the MEST, with both CF-1 and Balb/c mice, dithranol caused less swelling of the test ear after challenge than butantrone. According to the evaluation criteria of the MEST, only butantrone caused sensitization in 50% of the CF-1 mice and in 40% of the Balb/c mice. Thus, the GPMT was the only test which indicated the minor contact sensitizing potential of dithranol. On the other hand, the 10-butyryl analogue of dithranol showed undoubtedly stronger contact sensitizing potential than the parent compound in all tests. Therefore, as compared to dithranol, an increased risk of sensitization should be considered.     

Identification of contact allergens in C.I. Solvent Red 23 (commercial Sudan III) by chemical analysis and animal testing

C.I. Solvent Red 23, commercial Sudan III, is widely used in cosmetic products. Chemical analyses and guinea pig sensitization tests were carried out to identify its contact allergens. In the Magnusson & Kligman guinea pig maximization test, C.I. Solvent Red 23 showed 20% positive reactions. By conducting chemical analyses with HPLC and GLC, 2-naphthol (82 ppm), azobenzene (48 ppm), Sudan I (570 ppm) and many unknown impurities, as well as the main constituent pigment Sudan III (87%), were found. The chemical structure of one unknown impurity was identified as an isomer of Sudan III. We found that purified Sudan III showed no positive reaction, while the isomer elicited 30% positive reactions, in the same guinea pig test. Furthermore, cross-sensitization with p-phenylenediamine was investigated using the guinea pig test. Animals sensitized with p-phenylenediamine also showed positive elicitation reactions with purified Sudan III. From these results, the contact allergenicity of C.I. Solvent Red 23 is considered to be due to impurities, including the isomer of Sudan III, 1-(o-phenylazophenylazo)-2-naphthol. Positive reactions to Sudan III previously demonstrated in hairdressers are due to cross-sensitivity with p-phenylenediamine.     

An interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test for the identification and classification of skin sensitizers

The correct identification of potential skin sensitizers is an essential first step in enabling a proper risk assessment to be made and to permit the implementation of appropriate risk management practices designed to avoid the induction of sensitization, Consequently, regulatory guidelines around the world demand that new substances are evaluated to assess their skin sensitization potential. There are two guinea pig test methods which are generally recognised, the guinea pig maximisation test (GPMT) and the occluded patch test described by Buehler. In different countries, one procedure seems to be more prevalent and acceptable to regulatory authorities than the other. Notably, in the European Union, the latest revision of the Annex V (Directive 92/32/EC) Test Method for skin sensitization asks that justification should be given in the situation where the notifi this paper, the validity of the Buehler protocol in the context of European legislation is critically examined. Results from two laboratories are collated. showing that the method can identify significant contact allergens, particularly those which would he registered formally as such according to European legislation. It is demonstrated that minor methodological variations can he tolerated without compromising tesi sensitivity, hut it is recommended that suitable positive control testing is the best way to ensure proper test conduct.     

Copper – a rare sensitizer

To determine the incidence of patch test reactions to copper, 2% copper sulphate was included in our routine patch test series. The allergic potential of copper sulphate was evaluated by the guinea pig maximization test method (GPMT). 13 of the 1190 eczema patients showed reactions (1.1%), but they were considered non-relevant. 3 series of GPMT demonstrated that copper sulphate was a grade I allergen. A critical review of the literature disclosed that several reports on cases of allergic contact dermatitis to copper must be regarded as uncertain or non-relevant. 4 cases were considered relevant and another 20 cases probably relevant. It is suggested that a test reaction to copper sulphate should be verified by a serial dilution test (SDT). Furthermore, the sensitivity of patients to other metals should be stated, so that one can be aware that false positive reactions from metal impurities, especially nickel, in the copper salt used for testing may occur.     

Nickel-sulphate-induced contact dermatitis in the guinea pig maximization test: a dose-response study

Nickel sulphate is a sensitizer in guinea pigs, but the frequency of sensitization varies from study to study. The dose-response relationship for NiSO4.6H2O was evaluated in the guinea pig maximization test in this study. 6 intradermal (0.01%-3.0% aq.) and 6 topical (0.25%-10.0% pet.) concentrations were chosen for induction and NiSO4.6H2O 1% pet. was used for challenge, based on the absence of skin irritation in a pilot study. Blind reading was performed. A logistic dose-response model was applied to the challenge results. At 48 h, a linear relationship was obtained between the intradermal induction dose (but not topical dose) and the response, resulting in a maximum sensitization rate of 40% after 3% i.d. The reactivity disappeared at re-challenge 1 week later. Following a booster closed patch on day 35, using NiSO4 10% pet., the animals were challenged with NiSO4 2% pet. and statistical analyses of 72-h readings revealed a non-linear dose-response relationship, giving a maximum response frequency of 40% after initial induction with NiSO4 3% i.d. and 2% topical.     

Contact photoallergy testing of sunscreens in guinea pigs

The potential of 3 sunscreens (p-aminobenzoic acid, 4-isopropyldibenzoylmethane and homosalate) and 2 known human photoallergens (musk ambrette and tetrachlorosalicylanilide) to cause photoallergy, phototoxicity, and/or contact sensitization was determined using a guinea pig photoallergy model, as previously described by Harber and associates. The model was slightly modified by employing 6 exposures over 2 weeks and using Hill Top Chambers for application of the test material. Contact photoallergy was detected in guinea pigs treated with musk ambrette or tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCSA), although with TCSA, a lower incidence of contact sensitivity and phototoxicity was also detected. The results of studies conducted with sunscreens showed that p-aminobenzoic acid was photoallergenic, whereas homosalate and 4-isopropyl-dibenzoylmethane (Eusolex 8020) were not. However, contact sensitization, and to a lesser degree primary irritation, was detected with Eusolex 8020 at the concentrations employed in this study. The results of these studies suggest that this guinea pig model is a suitable model for assessing the photoallergic potential of various compounds, including the sunscreens tested in this study.     

Prevention of nickel-induced allergic contact reactions with pentoxifylline

In this study, we investigated the effect of pentoxifylline, an inhibitor of TNF-α, on the contact sensitivity response induced by nickel. For induction, open epicutaneous sensitization by NiSO₄. 6H₂O (25% aq.) solution was applied on the backs of 38 albino guinea pigs 5 days a week for 4 weeks. NaCl (0.9%) solution was applied epicutaneously to 10 albino guinea pigs as a control group. 19 were sensitized by nickel and developed positive patch test reactions. Patch tests were repeated after 10 of the sensitized pigs were given pentoxifylline 20 mg/kg/day orally. At the end of this study, only 2 positive patch test reactions were observed in the pentoxifylline-treated group, while 7/9 of the untreated guinea pigs developed positive reactions. These results suggest that pentoxifylline inhibits the contact sensitivity response induced by nickel only during drug administration.     

Phosgene (chlorophenyl)hydrazones, strong sensitizers found in yellow sweaters bleached with sodium hypochlorite, defined as causative allergens for contact dermatitis by an experimental screening method in animals

12 young men developed allergic contact dermatitis from wearing yellow cotton sweaters. We attempted to identify the causative agents by an experimental screening method in animals. Guinea pigs were sensitized with an acetone extract of the sweater material, by means of the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT). Active ingredients were then separated from the extract, by step-by-step patch test screening of chromatographic fractions in the guinea pigs, and finally analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Although there were 2 allergens with important activity (1 in the fraction eluted from the silica gel column with hexane, and 1 in the methanol fraction), the present study is focussed on the fat-soluble allergens in the hexane fraction. GC-MS analysis revealed that 4 kinds of phosgene (chlorophenyl)hydrazones (PCPHs) were present in the hexane fraction. PCPHs prepared in our laboratory showed strong eliciting activities, not only in the guinea pigs sensitized with the extract, but also in a male volunteer sensitized by exposure to a yellow sweater during irritancy testing. Phosgene (2,5-dichlorophenyl)hydrazone, which was the main component among the PCPHs found in the sweater, sensitized guinea pigs even at the 1 ppm level. From these results, we conclude that PCPHs were one of the allergens responsible for the cases.     

Influence of the vehicle on elicitation of contact allergic reactions to acrylic compounds in the guinea pig

Many factors can influence the elicitation of hypersensitivity reactions in guinea pigs and humans. The effect which the vehicle might have on the test response in guinea pigs sensitized with various acrylic compounds, using the "guinea pig maximization test", has been investigated. A marked decrease in the number of positive animals was seen when acetone was used as test vehicle, compared to petrolatum. The same result was seen with alcohol as vehicle, when neopentyl glycol diacrylate (NPGDA) was used as an acrylic monomer model. The patch test locations on the guinea pig flank, also affected the test response. Half of the animals did not react when challenged near the abdomen, compared to a test site near the back. By means of HPLC-analysis, the possible adsorption of the acrylic monomer to the aluminium chamber or filter paper disc, was analysed. Our findings did not indicate that adsorption occurs. A decrease in the amount of acrylic monomer in the chamber with increasing time, was noted. There was a marked difference in the monomer residue between solutions with (darkness) and without (daylight) inhibitor. The monomer decrease was also more affected by an aluminium surface than a glass or filter paper surface. Aluminium oxide probably enhances the polymerization process. The discrepancy between the test results in this study, when petrolatum and acetone were used as test vehicles, is due to a polymerization process of the acrylic compounds. Thus, the petrolatum vehicle probably prevents polymerization of the acrylic monomer.     

The effect of the guinea pig maximization protocol on the irritant response to deodorized kerosene – the excited skin syndrome *

Deodorized kerosene in a concentration of 50g/100g in pet. did not cause cutaneous inflammation in 10 control guinea pigs. The proportion of 19 guinea pigs exhibiting inflammation following exposure to deodorized kerosene in the guinea pig maximization test increased, but the increase was not significant. The response in a group of 40 animals, half exposed to tetraethyleneglycol diacrylate and half to nonylphenol polyethoxylate-6, increased (z= 3.505, p=0.004). The inflammatory response was related to concentration in both groups of animals which exhibited inflammatory responses to deodorized kerosene. The relevance of this alteration and irritant response of the interpretation of predictive to tests animals for sensitization, routine patch testing and repeated insult contact dermatitis is discussed.