Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison with a conventional instrumented technique

The prognosis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is strongly associated with the accuracy of the component alignment. To determine the accuracy of navigated UKA during primary minimally invasive Oxford UKA, twenty-nine knees of 29 consecutive patients (Group A) implanted using conventional instrumented UKA were followed by 23 knees of 17 consecutive patients (Group B) implanted by navigation assisted UKA and radiological results regarding alignments of the femorotibial mechanical axis, femur, and tibial component were compared in the two groups. Assessments of mechanical limb alignment revealed statistically significant increases in mechanical limb alignment post-operatively in both groups (p = 0.0 for both). In terms of component alignment, Group B had more prostheses implanted in the satisfactory range (> ± 3° from the targeted values) for the femoral and tibial components than Group A. There were no significant differences in the rate of prosthesis implanted within the range of radiographic alignment variations for the coronal implantation of either femoral or tibial components in both groups. (Radiographic alignment variation; coronal orientation of femoral components 90 ± 10°, sagittal orientation of femoral components 90 ± 5°, coronal orientation of tibial components from 10° varus to 5° valgus, sagittal orientation of tibial components from 7° of posterior tibial flexion to 5° of anterior tibial flexion). However, significant increases in the accuracies of sagittal implantation of femoral and tibial components were observed in Group B versus Group A. Our data suggest that navigated implantation improves the accuracy of the radiological implantation of the Oxford UKA prosthesis without increasing complications versus conventional UKA.     

Aiming for anatomical femoral axis on the coronal plane leads to good-to-excellent short-term outcomes in isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty

BackgroundIn patellofemoral replacement (PFR) coronal alignment is mostly influenced by local condylar anatomy. However, there is still a lack of consensus regarding references to follow intraoperatively for the optimal positioning of the trochlear component. The aim of this study was to assess whether aiming for the anatomical femoral axis on the coronal plane leads to improved clinical outcomes and whether coronal alignment correlates with clinical outcomes.MethodsForty-two patients who underwent PFR were retrospectively evaluated at a minimum one-year follow-up using Kujala and Knee Society Score (KSS). Moreover, patients underwent an anteroposterior hip-to-knee X-ray to evaluate the coronal alignment of the trochlear component with respect to the femoral anatomic and mechanical axis. Prosthesis coronal alignment, Kujala, and KSS were assessed for possible correlation.ResultsMean follow-up time: 29.1 months. Mean KSS for pain: 90 (± 8.9), for function: 93.7 (± 15.9); mean Kujala: 89.2 (± 13.6). Mean prosthesis coronal alignment was 3.3 ± 2.3° in valgus with respect to the femoral anatomic axis and 7.4 ± 2.6° in valgus with respect to the femoral mechanical axis. No correlations were found between coronal alignment and KSS or Kujala scores.ConclusionsResults from the current study showed that PF replacement with a third-generation implant led to good-to-excellent outcomes. In addition, the surgical technique used for aligning femoral component in this study resulted in reduced coronal alignment variability and achieved good short-term clinical outcomes.     

Quantitative measurement of lower limb mechanical alignment and coronal knee laxity in early flexion

BackgroundNon-invasive quantification of lower limb alignment using navigation technology is now possible throughout knee flexion owing to software developments. We report the precision and accuracy of a non-invasive system measuring mechanical alignment of the lower limb including coronal stress testing of the knee.MethodsTwelve cadaveric limbs were tested with a commercial invasive navigation system against the non-invasive system. Coronal mechanical femorotibial (MFT) alignment was measured with no stress, then 15 Nm varus and valgus applied moments. Measurements were recorded at 10° intervals from extension to 90° flexion. At each flexion interval, coefficient of repeatability (CR) tested precision within each system, and limits of agreement (LOA) tested agreement between the two systems. Limits for CR & LOA were set at 3° based on requirements for surgical planning and evaluation.ResultsPrecision was acceptable throughout flexion in all conditions of stress using the invasive system (CR ≤ 1.9°). Precision was acceptable using the non-invasive system from extension to 50° flexion (CR ≤ 2.4°), beyond which precision was unacceptable (> 3.4°). With no coronal stress applied, agreement remained acceptable from extension to 40° (LOA ≤ 2.4°), and when 15 Nm varus or valgus stress was applied agreement was acceptable from extension to 30° (LOA ≤ 2.9°). Higher angles of knee flexion had a negative impact on precision and accuracy.Conclusion & clinical relevanceThe non-invasive system provides reliable quantitative data in-vitro on coronal MFT alignment and laxity in the range relevant to assessment of collateral ligament injury, pre-operative planning of arthroplasty and flexion instability following arthroplasty. In-vivo validation should be performed.     

Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement

This study's aim was to assess the effect of component mal-alignment on outcome of Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR). Two hundred and eleven knees implanted with a medial UKR, using a minimally invasive approach, were followed up at a minimum of 4 years. Sagittal and frontal plane femoral and tibial component alignments were determined from antero-posterior and lateral radiographs. The cohort was divided into alignment groups which represented consecutive 2.5° intervals over the range of measured values for femoral varus/valgus, femoral flexion/extension, tibial varus/valgus and tibial tilt. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and incidence of radiolucency (RL) were compared between alignment groups for each alignment parameter. In 98% of cases the femoral components were positioned between 10° varus and 10° valgus; all femoral components were within ± 10° flexion. In 92% of cases the tibial components were positioned between ± 5° varus/valgus and superior/inferior tilt (neutral tilt being 7°). Within these ranges there were no significant differences in OKS or RL between the alignment groups; nor were there any differences between those at the extremes of component alignment compared to those in the inner ranges of alignment. We conclude that, because of the spherical femoral component, the Oxford UKR is tolerant to femoral mal-alignment of 10° and tibial mal-alignment of 5°.     

In vivo kinematic analysis of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for the valgus knee operated by the gap-balancing technique

BackgroundMost in vivo kinematic studies of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) report on the varus knee. The objective of the present study was to evaluate in vivo kinematics of a posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing TKA operated on a valgus knee during knee bending in weight-bearing (WB) and non-weight-bearing (NWB).MethodsA total of sixteen valgus knees in 12 cases that underwent TKA with Scorpio NRG PS knee prosthesis and that were operated on using the gap balancing technique were evaluated. We evaluated the in vivo kinematics of the knee using fluoroscopy and femorotibial translation relative to the tibial tray using a 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional registration technique.ResultsThe average flexion angle was 111.3° ± 7.5° in WB and 114.9° ± 8.4° in NWB. The femoral component demonstrated a mean external rotation of 5.9° ± 5.8° in WB and 7.4° ± 5.2° in NWB. In WB and NWB, the femoral component showed a medial pivot pattern from 0° to midflexion and a bicondylar rollback pattern from midflexion to full flexion. The medial condyle moved similarly in the WB condition and in the NWB condition. The lateral condyle moved posteriorly at a slightly earlier angle during the WB condition than during the NWB condition.ConclusionsWe conclude that similar kinematics after TKA can be obtained with the gap balancing technique for the preoperative valgus deformity when compared to the kinematics of a normal knee, even though the magnitude of external rotation was small. Level of evidence: IV.     

Recutting the distal femur to increase maximal knee extension during TKA causes coronal plane laxity in mid-flexion

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to quantify the effects of distal femoral cut height on maximal knee extension and coronal plane knee laxity.MethodsSeven fresh-frozen cadaver legs from hip-to-toe underwent a posterior stabilized TKA using a measured resection technique with a computer navigation system equipped with a robotic cutting guide. After the initial femoral resections were performed, the posterior joint capsule was sutured until a 10° flexion contracture was obtained with the trial components in place. Two distal femoral recuts of + 2 mm each were then subsequently made and the trials were reinserted. The navigation system was used to measure the maximum extension angle achieved and overall coronal plane laxity [in degrees] at maximum extension, 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion, when applying a standardized varus/valgus load of 9.8 [Nm] across the knee.ResultsFor a 10 degree flexion contracture, performing the first distal recut of + 2 mm increased overall coronal plane laxity by approximately 4.0° at 30° of flexion (p = 0.002) and 1.9° at 60° of flexion (p = 0.126). Performing the second + 2 mm recut of the distal femur increased mid-flexion laxity by 6.4° (p < 0.0001) at 30° and 4.0° at 60° of flexion (p = 0.01), compared to the 9 mm baseline resection (control). Maximum knee extension increased from 10° of flexion to 6.4° (± 2.5° SD, p < 0.005) and to 1.4° (± 1.8° SD, p < 0.001) of flexion with each 2 mm recut of the distal femur.ConclusionsRecutting the distal femur not only increases the maximum knee extension achieved but also increases coronal plane laxity in midflexion.     

Accuracy of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundAccuracy of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant placement and overall limb are important goals of TKA technique.MethodsThe accuracy and ease of use of an accelerometer-based hand-held navigation system for tibial resection during TKA was examined in 90 patients. Preoperative goals for sagittal alignment, navigation system assembly time, resection time, and tourniquet time were evaluated. Coronal and sagittal alignment was measured postoperatively.ResultsThe average coronal tibial component alignment was 0.43° valgus; 6.7% of patients had tibial coronal alignment outside of ± 3° varus/valgus. The difference between the intraoperative goal and radiographically measured posterior tibial slope was 0.5°. The average time to completion of the tibial cut was 4.6 minutes.ConclusionThe accelerometer-based hand-held navigation system was accurate for tibial coronal and sagittal alignment during TKA, with no additional surgical time compared with conventional instrumentation.     

The effect of medial condylar bone loss of the knee on coronal plane stability--a cadaveric study

IntroductionThe quantitative effects of medial bone loss of the knee on both leg alignment and coronal plane stability are poorly understood.Materials and methodsUtilizing computer navigation, 5 mm bone defects of the medial distal femur (MDF), medial posterior femoral condyle (MPF), and medial tibial plateau (MT) were simulated in 10 cadaveric limbs, and alignment of the knee at various degrees of flexion were analyzed when applying standardized varus and valgus loads.ResultsThe 5 mm MPF defect significantly increased varus laxity at 90° of flexion by 3.3° ± 1.2° (p = 0.019), a 5 mm MDF defect resulted in a 2.2° ± 1.7° (p = 0.037) and a 2.1° ± 1.3° (p = 0.023) increase in laxity at 0° and 30° of flexion, respectively, and a 5 mm MT defect increased varus laxity at all flexion angles by 4.0° to 7.0°, but was only statistically significant at 30° (p = 0.026).DiscussionThis study confirms and quantifies the theories of flexion and extension gap balancing, and pseudolaxity of the medial collateral ligament in the varus knee, the results of which can be used in preoperative planning and intraoperative decision making for both total knee and unicondylar arthroplasty.     

Patient specific cutting guides versus an imageless,computer-assisted surgery system in total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundPatient specific cutting guides (PSC) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have recently been introduced, in which preoperative 3-dimensional imaging is used to manufacture disposable cutting blocks specific to a patient's anatomy. The purpose of this study was to compare the alignment accuracy of PSC to an imageless CAS system in TKA.MethodsThirty-seven patients (41 knees), received a TKA using an imageless CAS system. Subsequently, 38 patients (41 knees), received a TKA using a MRI-based, PSC system.Postoperatively, standing AP hip-to-ankle radiographs were obtained, from which the lower extremity mechanical axis, tibial component varus/valgus, and femoral component varus/valgus mechanical alignment were digitally measured. Each measurement was performed by two blinded, independent observers, and interclass correlations were calculated. A student's two-tailed t test was used to compare the two cohorts (p-value < 0.05 = significant).ResultsIn the PSC cohort, 70.7% of patients had an overall alignment within 3° of a neutral mechanical axis (vs. 92.7% with CAS, p = 0.02), 87.8% had a tibial component alignment within 2° of perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis (vs. 100% with CAS, p = 0.04), and 90.2% had a femoral component alignment within 2° of perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis (vs. 100% with CAS, p = 0.2). Interclass correlation coefficients were good to excellent for all radiographic measurements.ConclusionWhile PSC techniques appear sound in principle, this study did not demonstrate patient specific cutting guides to obtain the same degree of overall mechanical and tibial component alignment accuracy as a CAS technique.Level of evidenceIII: Retrospective cohort study.     

Surgical epicondylar axis is not orthogonal to the femoral mechanical knee axis in valgus knees with primary osteoarthritis: Three-dimensional analysis according to knee coronal alignment in 112 patients

BackgroundDuring total knee arthroplasty (TKA), most surgeons align the femoral component along the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) considering it as orthogonal to the femoral mechanical axis. However, it is still unclear how SEA coronal alignment varies according to the native coronal knee alignment. The main goal of this study was to analyze the SEA orientation according to the native coronal knee morphotype.MethodsA total of 112 patients underwent a three-dimensional (3D) -planning-based TKA. The SEA was then determined by locating the epicondyles on 3D models. The 3D femoral and tibial mechanical axes were marked and the femoral (FMA) and tibial (TMA) mechanical angles were measured. The native HKA angle was measured as FMA + TMA. The SEA orientation angles were measured in the coronal (SEA-α) and axial (SEA-β) plane. SEA orientation was compared between the valgus, neutral, and varus knees.ResultsThe mean SEA-α angle was 90.2 ± 3° and the mean axial SEA-β angle was 92.2 ± 1.3°. The SEA-α angle was significantly higher in the valgus group compared with the neutral group (92.3 ± 2.9°, 90 ± 2.9°, P = 0.0009) whereas there was no significant difference in the SEA-α angle between the varus and the neutral group (89.7 ± 2.3°, 90 ± 2.9°, P = 0.32).ConclusionsIn contrast to the neutral and varus knees, the SEA was not orthogonal to the femoral mechanical axis in patients undergoing TKA for primary osteoarthritis. Our results suggest adapting the coronal alignment of the femoral component during TKA, while maintaining an average 2° valgus in valgus knees. By contrast, with varus and neutral knees, our data support the use of a mechanical alignment.     

Do long leg supine CT scanograms correlate with weight-bearing full-length radiographs to measure lower limb coronal alignment?

IntroductionThe gold standard for measuring knee alignment is the lower limb mechanical axis (MA) using weight-bearing lower limb full-length x-ray (FLX). However, CT scanograms (CTS) are becoming increasingly popular in view of lower radiation exposure, speed of data acquisition and supine positioning. We compared the correlation and degree of agreement of knee joint coronal alignment using these two imaging modalities.MethodFrom our series of complex primary and revision knee arthroplasty patients, we selected those with both FLX and CTS recorded onto digital PACS. The coronal alignments were assessed in 24 knees and the valgus/varus angles relative to the MA were measured. Results were analysed statistically using the paired samples t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, intra-class correlation coefficient, Cohen's kappa and Passing and Bablok regression to assess potential equality of methods.ResultsThe mean MA was 180.5° (165°–200°) for the CTS and 181° (164°–202°) for the FLX. The CTS MA angle data between the assessors were highly correlated (r = 0.971, p < 0.001) as were FLX MA angle measurements (r = 0.988, p < 0.001). 41.7% of the CTS and 37.5% of the FLX were in varus alignment, while 50% of the CTS and 43.8% of the FLX were in valgus alignment. Malalignment > 5° was revealed by 18.8% of the CTS and 35.4% of the FLX.ConclusionOverall, good agreement was observed in MA angle data between the two imaging modalities, but reproducibility may be problematic. In the malaligned limb, weight-bearing FLX still remains a vital imaging modality. CTS should be used with caution in view of the under-detection of malalignment.     

Factors contributing to inherent varus alignment of lower limb in normal Asian adults: Role of tibial plateau inclination

PurposeThis prospective study aimed to evaluate radiographically, mechanical or hip–knee–ankle (HKA) axis in healthy, asymptomatic, Asian (Indian and Korean) adults between 20 and 40 years of age to determine the incidence of inherent varus (mechanical limb alignment of > 3° varus) and the factors influencing it.MethodsThree hundred and eighty-eight lower limbs were evaluated using full length, standing hip-to-ankle radiographs in 198 healthy, asymptomatic, Asian (Indian and Korean) adults between 20 and 40 years of age to assess the hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), femoral bowing and femoral neck–shaft angle to determine the incidence of inherent varus (mechanical limb alignment of > 3° varus) and the factors influencing it.ResultsOverall, the mean HKA angle was 177.6° ± 2.6° with 34.5% of limbs in inherent varus (mean HKA angle 174.9° ± 1.8°). The incidence of inherent varus was significantly higher (p = 0.01) in males (40%) compared to females (28%) but similar among Indian (34%) and Korean subjects (35%). The hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle showed significant positive correlation (r = 0.82, p < 0.001) with only the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA).ConclusionsInherent varus alignment of the lower limb is fairly common among asymptomatic, Asian adults. These results raise several pertinent questions regarding the role of inherent varus in the aetiopathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis and in lower limb realignment procedures.     

Optimization of sagittal and coronal planes with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Background

One of the anatomic goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is optimizing in the coronal and sagittal plane. Accurate alignments of both planes have been correlated to functional outcome and range of motion. There is a paucity of evidence on the accuracy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in balancing biplanar knee alignment – specifically sagittal plane alignment. Because robotic assisted UKA has an advantage of more accurately manipulating sagittal plane for optimal alignment and kinematics based on pre-operative and intraoperative CT planning we assessed the accuracy.

Effect of tibial component varus on wear in total knee arthroplasty

IntroductionMalalignment can result in poor clinical outcomes and increased wear. However, component malalignment can occur even when overall limb mechanical axis is within the normal anatomic range. We studied the effect of component malalignment in the presence of acceptable knee alignment in knee arthroplasty.MethodsSixteen tibial inserts retrieved at revision surgery were laser-mapped to measure wear. Average implantation duration was 7.7 years (range, 1 to 13). Early (postprimary) and final (prerevision) radiographs were analyzed for overall alignment (limb, femoral and tibial components) and osteolysis.ResultsThe tibial components were initially aligned in a mean of 1.3 ± 1.7° varus (range, –1.5 to 4.5°), which increased to 3.2 ± 2.9° (range, –2.0 to 8.0°) at the time of revision (p = 0.05). Tibial components initially placed in greater than 3° varus were associated with almost twice the volumetric penetration rate. Anatomic knee angles were 5.4 ± 0.9° valgus (range, 4.0 to 7.0°) in the post-primary radiographs and decreased in prerevision radiographs to 3.8 ± 2.6° (range, –1.0 to 7.5°), (p = 0.04).DiscussionTibial varus was associated with increased medial compartment wear and total wear, thus affecting osteolysis in addition to local destruction of the bearing surface. Varus malalignment as low as 3° may result in accelerated wear, even if overall limb alignment is nearly ideal. These results indicate that tibial component alignment is an important factor associated with tibial tray subsidence and polyethylene wear even when limb alignment is neutral.     

Reliability of stress radiography in the assessment of coronal laxity following total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundStress radiography is used in the valuation of soft tissue laxity following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, reliability and agreement is largely unknown.MethodsIn this prospective reliability study, we included 15 participants with prior TKA. Standardized coronal stress radiographs were obtained in both extension and flexion and with both varus and valgus stress. All radiographs were repeated (test–retest). In extension the Telos stress device was used, and flexion radiographs were obtained using the epicondylar-view. Three independent raters measured angulation between femoral and tibial component from all radiographs. Reliability was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and agreement visualized with Bland–Altman plots and by mean difference and limits of agreement (LOA).ResultsStress radiography in extension showed excellent reliability with ICC = 0.96 (0.95–0.98) and LOA of ± 1.2°. Stress radiography at 80–90° of flexion showed good to excellent reliability when measuring medial laxity with ICC = 0.94 (0.89–0.97) and LOA of ± 1.7°; however, when measuring lateral laxity the reliability was only moderate to good with ICC = 0.70 (0.51–0.84) and LOA of ± 6.3°.ConclusionStress radiography is clinically applicable and the methods described in this study provide excellent reliability for measurement of laxity in extension. The reliability of measurements in flexion is good to excellent when measuring medial laxity but only moderate to good when measuring lateral laxity.     

External rotation of the tibial component should be avoided in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BackgroundLateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) leads to good clinical outcomes for isolated lateral osteoarthritis. However, the impact of the tibial component position on postoperative outcomes in lateral UKA is yet to be determined.PurposeThis study investigated the influence of tibial component malposition on clinical outcomes in lateral UKA.MaterialsThis was a retrospective study of 50 knees (mean age 73.5 years) who underwent lateral UKA between September 2013 and January 2019. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Score – Knee (KSSK), and Knee Society Score – Function (KSSF) were evaluated. The coronal alignment, posterior slope of tibial component, tibial component rotation relative to Akagi’s line (angle α), and femoral anteroposterior (AP) axis (angle β) were measured postoperatively. The average follow up period was 2.3 (range, 1–4.9) years.ResultsClinical scores were significantly improved after lateral UKA. The mean coronal alignment was 0.9° ± 3.2° varus (range, 9.1° varus to 5.5° valgus), the mean posterior slope was 6.8° ± 3.8° (range, 0.8° to 14.8°). The mean α and β angles, were 4.1° ± 5.8° (range, −9.7° to 16.5°) and 6.7° ± 7.1° (range, −7.0° to 20.5°) external rotation. The angle α had significant negative correlations with postoperative OKS (r = −0.36), KSSK (r = −0.28), and KSSF (r = −0.39), and angle β had significant negative correlations with postoperative OKS (r = −0.34) and KSSK (r = −0.46).ConclusionExcessive external rotation of the tibial component could negatively influence the postoperative outcomes of lateral UKA.     

In vivo kinematic comparison before and after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty during high-flexion activities

BackgroundMany patients who undergo unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have an expectation that their knee flexion would increase following its replacement. Additionally, the survival rate of mobile-bearing UKA (MB-UKA) is high. However, the effect on the patient's kinematics remains unknown. This study aimed to clarify the kinematic effect of MB-UKA knees during high-flexion activities by comparing the in vivo kinematics before and after surgery.MethodsA squatting motion was performed under fluoroscopic surveillance in the sagittal plane before and after MB-UKA. To estimate the spatial position and orientation of the knee, a two-dimensional/three-dimensional registration technique was used. The femoral rotation and varus–valgus angle relative to the tibia and anteroposterior (AP) translation of the medial and lateral side of the femur on the plane perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis in each flexion angle were evaluated.ResultsRegarding the varus–valgus angle, the preoperative knees indicated a significant varus alignment compared with the postoperative knees from 10° to 60° of flexion. There were no significant differences in the femoral rotation angle, AP translation, and kinematic pathway before and after MB-UKA in the mid-flexion of the range of motion.ConclusionThere were differences between the varus–valgus knee kinematics before and after MB-UKA, from 10 to 60° of flexion, but no difference from midrange of flexion to deep flexion. In addition, the rotational knee kinematics before and after MB-UKA was not significantly different.     

Aligning the tibial component with medial border of the tibial tubercle—is it always right?

IntroductionCorrect rotational alignment of the tibial component is crucial for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Several studies have indicated that the best rotational orientation of the tibial component is close to the medial border of the tibial tubercle. However, it remains obscure whether it is always right. Thus, the objective of current study was to quantify tibial rotational alignment in 120 primary rotating platform TKAs using the medial border of tibial tubercle as a landmark between July 2008 and June 2010.MethodsThe femoral component was positioned parallel to the transepicondlylar axis, and a rotating platform trial insert was used to determine tibial insert rotational alignment relative to the most medial aspect of the tibial tubercle with the knee in full extension. Rotational alignment of the components was detected based on radiograph and CT scan. This investigation is based on the premise that all neutral points would lie within 10° of the mean.ResultsThe mean divergence external to the medial border of the tubercle was 2.3° ± 3.5°. However, six of the knees (5%) had neutral points ≥ 10° from the mean, including two valgus knees measured 10° of internal rotation and four varus knees measured 10° of external rotation.ConclusionUsing the medial border of tibial tubercle as a landmark does not always result in a good femoro-tibial rotational alignment. Surgeons using fixed bearings component should be aware of this effect to avoid suboptimal outcomes resulting from tibiofemoral rotational malalignment in full extension.Level of evidenceDiagnostic study, Level II-3.     

Finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Concerns over accelerated damage to the untreated compartment of the knee following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), as well as the relatively poor success rates observed for lateral as opposed to the medial arthroplasty, remain issues for attention. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to assess changes to the kinematics and potential for cartilage damage across the knee joint in response to the implantation of the Oxford Mobile Bearing UKA. FE models of lateral and medial compartment arthroplasty were developed, in addition to a healthy natural knee model, to gauge changes incurred through the arthroplasty. Varus–valgus misalignments were introduced to the femoral components to simulate surgical inaccuracy or over-correction. Boundary conditions from the Stanmore knee simulator during the stance phase of level gait were used. AP translations of the tibia in the medial UKA models were comparable to the behaviour of the natural knee models (±0.6 mm deviation from pre-operative motion). Following lateral UKA, 4.1 mm additional posterior translation of the tibia was recorded than predicted for the natural knee. IE rotations of the medial UKA models were less consistent with the pre-operative knee model than the lateral UKA models (7.7° vs. 3.6° deviation). Varus misalignment of the femoral prosthesis was more influential than valgus for medial UKA kinematics, whereas in lateral UKA, a valgus misalignment of the femoral prosthesis was most influential on the kinematics. Resection of the cartilage in the medial compartment reduced the overall risk of progressive OA in the knee, whereas removing the cartilage from the lateral compartment, and in particular introducing a valgus femoral misalignment, increased the overall risk of progressive OA in the knee. Based on these results, under the conditions tested herein, both medial and lateral UKA can be said to induce kinematics of the knee which could be considered broadly comparable to those of the natural knee, and that even a 10° varus–valgus misalignment of the femoral component may not induce highly irregular kinematics. However, elevated posterior translation of the tibia in lateral UKA and large excursions of the insert may explain the higher incidence of bearing dislocation observed in some clinical studies.     

No effect of obesity on limb and component alignment after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty

PurposeThis retrospective study aimed to determine if computer navigation provides consistent accuracy for limb and component alignment during TKA irrespective of body mass index (BMI) by comparing limb and component alignment and the outlier rates in obese versus non-obese individuals undergoing computer-assisted TKA.MethodsSix hundred and thirty-five computer assisted total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed in non-obese individuals (BMI < 30 kg/m²) were compared with 520 computer-assisted TKAs in obese individuals (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) for postoperative limb and component alignment using full length standing hip-to-ankle radiographs.ResultsNo significant difference in postoperative limb alignment (179.7° ± 1.7° vs 179.6° ± 1.8°), coronal femoral (90.2° ± 1.6° vs 89.8° ± 1.9°) and tibial component (90.2° ± 1.6° vs 90.3° ± 1.7°) alignment and outlier rates (6.2% vs 7.5%) was found between non-obese and obese individuals. Similarly, alignment and the outlier rates were similar when non-obese individuals and a subgroup of morbidly obese individuals (BMI > 40 kg/m²) were compared.ConclusionsComputer navigation can achieve excellent limb and component alignment irrespective of a patient's BMI. Although obesity may not be an indication per se for using computer navigation during TKA, it will help achieve consistently accurate limb and component alignment in obese patients.Level of EvidenceLevel II