Development of clinical immunosuppression for organ transplantation

The progress in the understanding of allograft rejection since the first modern kidney transplantation is enormous. The concept of the histocompatibility complex (HLA system) was born and the loci for the related genes are now identified. The actual structure of HLA antigens and the molecules (lymphokines) released by them are being understood. A population of lymphocytes (suppressor cells) which reduces the host immune response to tissue allografts has also been identified. With advanced understanding, ideas and methods for immunosuppression have been developed. Hyperacute rejection due to presensitization (secondary to preformed HLA antibody) ought to be avoided or attenuated, if it were to happen. The significance of previous blood transfusion or multiple pregnancies were clarified in this regard. The tests to determine such immunological reactivity were devised. Steroids, azathioprine and cyclosporine which are presently in use for immunosuppression were reviewed as to their actions, effects and side-effects. Total lymphoid irradiation presently appears as a potential effective immunosuppressive procedure and is currently being tried in certain transplant centers. The superiority of monoclonal antibodies against polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies has been confirmed, although the latter also has various useful actions. Finally, the need and possible means to facilitate donor specific unresponsiveness are mentioned in perspectives for the future management of clinical organ transplantation.     

The presence of donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies does not preclude successful withdrawal of tacrolimus in stable renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Because of the adverse events associated with the administration of immunosuppressive drugs, reduction of immunosuppression after solid-organ transplantation is highly desirable provided that graft rejection is prevented. In our transplant center, we used an immunosuppression reduction regimen in stable renal transplant patients. The presence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has been negatively associated with transplant outcome. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of HLA antibodies on the occurrence of acute rejection after immunosuppression reduction. METHODS: The presence and antigen specificity of HLA immunoglobulin G antibodies in serum samples were detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and single-antigen bead assays. Donor-specific cytotoxic potential was tested by standard CDC cross-match analysis. RESULTS: The presence of donor-specific or total HLA antibodies was not predictive for the occurrence of acute rejection after the reduction of immunosuppression. In addition, the presence of HLA antibodies did not preclude successful reduction of immunosuppression. After reduction of immunosuppression, newly formed HLA antibodies were seldom detected. Interestingly, evaluation of the cytotoxic potential of the detected HLA antibodies revealed that the one patient who developed donor-specific HLA antibodies and experienced a subsequent rejection episode was the only patient who carried cytotoxic HLA antibodies. This finding fueled the notion that the functional capacity, rather than the mere presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies, is indicative for transplant outcome. CONCLUSION: The presence of HLA antibodies does not preclude the successful reduction of immunosuppression in renal transplant patients with stable graft function.     

Pretransplant identification of acute rejection risk following kidney transplantation

Lack of an accepted definition for ‘high immunological risk’ hampers individualization of immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. For recipient‐related risk factors for acute rejection, the most compelling evidence points to younger age and African American ethnicity. Recipient gender, body mass, previous transplantation, and concomitant infection or disease do not appear to be influential. Deceased donation now has only a minor effect on rejection risk, but older donor age remains a significant predictor. Conventional immunological markers (human leukocyte antigen [HLA] mismatching, pretransplant anti‐HLA alloantibodies, and panel reactive antibodies) are being reassessed in light of growing understanding about the role of donor‐specific antibodies (DSA). At the time of transplant, delayed graft function is one of the most clear‐cut risk factors for acute rejection. Extended cold ischemia time (≥24 h) may also play a contributory role. While it is not yet possible to establish conclusively the relative contribution of different risk factors for acute rejection after kidney transplantation, the available data point to variables that should be taken into account at the time of transplant. Together, these offer a realistic basis for planning an appropriate immunosuppression regimen in individual patients.     

Relevance of posttransplant flow cytometric T- and B-cell crossmatches in tacrolimus-treated renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND: De novo development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies after transplantation is associated with increased rejection and decreased graft survival. In this study, the effect of posttransplant HLA antibodies on clinical outcome was evaluated in patients treated with tacrolimus by means of flow cytometric crossmatches (FCXm). METHODS: T- and B-cell FCXm were performed retrospectively on posttransplant sera of patients who received a graft between 1997 and 1999. Ninety-four kidney-only recipients were tested and all FCXm positive sera were investigated for the presence of HLA class I and II antibodies by Flow panel reactive antibodies. RESULTS: From 94 patients with a negative pretransplant complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch, seven (7%) showed a positive pretransplant FCXm. After transplantation the FCXm became positive in five patients (6%). The predictive value of a positive FCXm after transplantation, and the log-transformed relative change in fluorescence ratio between pretransplant and posttransplant serum, were not significant to rejection within six months, nor to graft survival censored for death. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of HLA antibodies before rejection or graft failure could only be shown in a minority of patients; most antibodies were detected after graft failure, especially after transplantectomy. Monitoring through antibody testing after transplantation on the basis of our results has no added value with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.     

HLA mismatches remain risk factors for acute kidney allograft rejection in patients receiving quadruple immunosuppression with anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies

BACKGROUND: New immunosuppressive drugs such as anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (aIL2R) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have reduced the incidence of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Whether matching donor and recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens is still relevant in patients receiving modern immunosuppression has been questioned. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence and risk factors of acute rejection during the first posttransplant year and the impact of acute rejection on long-term graft survival in a cohort of 208 renal transplant patients treated with aIL2R (basiliximab, n=166; daclizumab, n=42), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, n=180; cyclosporin, n=28), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Graft and patient survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors for acute rejection were analyzed by logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were treated for acute rejection (26 biopsy-proven) during the first posttransplant year. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of first-year acute rejection was 13.2%. The number of HLA mismatches (odds ratio [OR] 1.65 per HLA mismatch) and long periods of dialysis before transplantation (OR 3.1 for more than 4 years of dialysis) were the only independent risk factors for first-year acute rejection. First-year acute rejection was associated with a significant reduction in overall and death-censored graft survival at 5 years after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Although infrequent in patients receiving modern immunosuppressive drugs, acute rejection remains an important risk factor for graft loss after renal transplantation. Our results suggest that better HLA matching and shorter periods of dialysis before transplantation could reduce acute rejection rates and further improve outcomes under current immunosuppressive regimens.     

Significance of anti-HLA and donor-specific antibodies in long-term renal graft survival

Numerous studies have demonstrated an association of posttransplant HLA antibodies with decreased long-term graft survival. The presence of C4d deposition in these cases supports the hypothesis that antibody and complement deposition are involved in the pathogenesis of graft failure. Development of HLA antibodies may predate the clinical manifestation of chronic rejection (CR). However, frequency of donor-specific antibody is low when all patients are screened regardless of their graft function, and it may be more valuable to look for antibody only in patients with mild dysfunction. Effective treatment for CR has not been identified, although increased immunosuppression has been shown to decrease antibody levels and stabilize graft function. Many patients have been identified with good graft function despite the presence of circulating donor-specific HLA antibody. Additional studies focusing on the mechanism behind the apparent protection from the detrimental effects of antibody in such patients are needed.     

Hyperacute rejection in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation: Significance of isoagglutinin subclass

IntroductionABO-incompatible transplantation has expanded the limited donor pool for kidney transplantation. Despite the successful desensitization protocols and immunosuppression, undesirable cases of hyperacute rejection occurs.ObjectiveFlow cytometry was used to measure isoagglutinin titer and its IgG subclasses in assessment of the cause of hyperacute rejection in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.Materials and methodsThe recipient was admitted for kidney transplantation due to end-stage renal disease. Pre-transplantation work-up for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation included blood group typing, HLA DNA typing and HLA antibody analyses. HLA crossmatch analysis was conducted using donor lymphocytes and anti-HLA antibody assay using Luminex panel reactive antibody test (One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA). Desensitization protocol was composed of therapeutic plasma exchange sessions and rituximab.ResultsDespite negative HLA crossmatch results, a case of hyperacute rejection occurred after living donor kidney transplantation. Rejection resulted in immediate removal of graft, and the patient later received a second kidney transplantation. Retrospective evaluation of isoagglutinin titer and its subclasses using flow cytometry identified the cause of rejection to increased IgG1 subclass. Desensitization protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation now implements further caution for blood group O recipients.DiscussionHyperacute rejection resulting from increased IgG1 isoagglutinin subclass has not been previously confirmed using flow cytometry. Unfortunate outcome of this rejection case provides insight to how we should approach and ensure successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.     

Anti-HLA antibodies in kidney transplanted patients

Anti-human leukocyte antibodies (HLA) play a central role in graft survival, particularly in kidney transplantation. The presence of preformed donor specific anti-HLA antibodies is always excluded before transplantation by performing crossmatches using current and historic recipient serum samples. Several recent studies have observed a correlation between HLA antibodies and graft rejection. It has been suggested that these antibodies should be monitored routinely after kidney transplant to predict graft failure. Here in report the results of a study of on serum samples from 111 kidney transplant recipients that were monitored for anti-HLA antibodies using flow cytometry. Anti-HLA antibodies were only detected in four pre-immunized patients and showed the same HLA specificity that was present before the transplantation (in two cases against previous graft antigens). Furthermore, only two patients with functioning grafts developed anti-HLA antibodies, at 1 month and 1 year after the transplantation. However, they were not donor specific, but probably related to posttransplant transfusions. In our study, none of the patients who suffered an adverse event during the first year (including two with histologically documented acute rejection) developed anti-HLA antibodies. These results are probably related to the use of mycophenolate mofetil, which may reduce the incidence of HLA antibodies. We cannot exclude the possibility that antibodies produced by some patients may not be detectable because they are attached to the graft.     

Advances in transplantation immunology

Although there have been dramatic advances in clinical organ transplantation over the past 20 years, rejection, both acute and chronic, and the complications of immunosuppression remain major problems. Nevertheless as our understanding of the immune response to a vascularized organ allograft develops, so too will our ability to develop more specific immunosuppression. In any strategy for more specific immunosuppression compatibility for the major histocompatibility complex of antigens (HLA in man) is likely to be important. Monoclonal antibodies to T cell subpopulations, or even to T cells specifically activated by the graft, provide methods of suppressing the immune response at a more specific level. The recognition that stable grafts are maintained, at least in experimental rodent models, by T suppressor cells may allow development of precise methods of inducing the generation of such cells in clinical practice. The induction of tolerance in the adult animal can be achieved in a number of ways, the most promising of which for clinical application, is antigen pretreatment. If tolerance could be achieved in clinical practice within the not too distant future, then this would represent the attainment of the ultimate goal of transplantation.     

Luminex and antibody detection in kidney transplantation

Preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies have a negative effect on kidney transplantation outcome with an increased rejection rate and reduction in survival. Posttransplantation production of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies is indicative of an active immune response and risk of transplantation rejection. For many years the primary technique for anti-HLA antibody detection was complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), which has been integrated by solid-phase assays as HLA antigen-coated bead methods (Luminex). This new technological approach has allowed identification of anti-HLA antibodies, not detectable using conventional CDC method, in patients awaiting kidney transplantation. Moreover, use of Luminex technology has enabled better definition of acceptable or unacceptable antigens favoring transplantation in highly immunized patients. However, there are still many unresolved issues, including the clinical relevance of antibodies detected with this system.     

Monitoring efficiency of humoral rejection episode therapy in liver transplantation: any role for complement binding Luminex Single Antigen assays?

Humoral rejection and its relationship with anti HLA antibodies have been extensively studied in organ transplantation with the exception of liver transplantation (LT). Recently, association between donor specific anti HLA antibodies (DSA) and increased risk of rejection and graft loss has been suggested in LT. When such antibodies appear, adequate treatment and monitoring are needed to avoid or delay allograft loss. We report here three cases of probable antibody-mediated rejection developed after pregnancy in liver transplanted women. Sera at the time of rejection and during follow-up have been retrospectively tested for the ability of DSA to bind complement components. These cases display different outcomes depending on the complement binding DSA capacity and titers after treatment of the rejection episodes. Thus, they highlight the potential interest of complement binding Luminex Single Antigen assays to monitor the efficiency of anti-rejection therapy.     

Significance of HLA-matching and anti-HLA antibodies in heart transplant patients receiving induction therapy?

ObjectivesThough Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) matching benefits are demonstrated in renal transplantation, evidence in heart transplantation is lacking, and its clinical feasibility is uncertain. Post-transplantation anti-HLA antibodies are being increasingly studied in organ transplantation, with diverging conclusions between transplantated organs.MethodsWe analyzed retrospectively the influence of HLA matching and anti-HLA antibodies on overall survival, acute rejection and chronic allograft vasculopathy in 309 patients receiving induction therapy and triple-drug immunosuppression.ResultsThe average number of HLA-A/B/DR mismatches between donor and recipient was 4.9 ± 1. The majority of mismatches was for Class I HLA-A/B with an average of 3.3, then for Class I HLA-DR with an average of 1.6. Overall, the HLA-A/-B/-DR mismatches had no influence on the cardiac allograft survival (p = 0.28). However, HLA-DR mismatches were negatively correlated to severe cellular and/or humoral allograft rejection (p = 0.04). Our analysis found anti-HLA antibodies in 27% of recipients, de novo anti-HLA antibodies in 16% of recipients, and donor-specific anti-HLA (DSA) antibodies in 8% of recipients. Furthermore, de novo DSA had no influence on the 5-year survival (78% with DSA vs. 92% without DSA; p = 0.49), which may be masked by the limited number of recipients in analysis By univariable analysis, anti-HLA antibodies (preexisting or de novo) unrelated or related to the donor had no influence on severe cellular and/or humoral rejection or on chronic allograft vasculopathy.ConclusionsHLA-DR mismatch was negatively correlated to severe cellular and/or humoral allograft rejection but had no influence on cardiac allograft survival. In this study, anti-HLA antibodies (preexisting or de novo) unrelated or related to the donor had no influence on cellular and/or humoral rejection or on chronic allograft vasculopathy. The results of this study add to the controversy on the impact of allo-antibodies in heart transplant recipients receiving induction therapy and contemporary immunosuppression.     

HLA-specific antibodies are associated with high-grade and persistent-recurrent lung allograft acute rejection.

BACKGROUND: The impact of HLA-specific antibodies is not well established in the acute rejection of lung allografts. Acute rejection represents the most important risk factor for the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. METHODS: We analyzed the pattern of HLA antibodies before and after transplantation in 54 patients, and correlated our data with the presence and frequency of high-grade and persistent-recurrent acute rejection, during the first 18 post-operative months. The diagnosis of acute rejection was based on histologic International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT)-published criteria. RESULTS: Ten of 54 patients had a positive enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) post-transplantation. In 90% of ELISA-positive patients, the presence of HLA antibodies was associated with persistent-recurrent acute rejections, compared with 34% in the ELISA-negative group (p < 0.005). There were 28 high-grade acute rejection episodes in the ELISA-positive group, compared with 36 in the ELISA-negative group (p < 0.0001). The ELISA-positive patients required a greater intensity of immunosuppressive therapy. The patients with ELISA-detected anti-HLA antibodies were at least 3-fold more likely to develop high-grade acute rejection and persistent-recurrent acute rejection, and 7-fold more likely to develop multiple episodes of persistent-recurrent acute rejection, compared with ELISA-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: ELISA-based screening for the development of HLA antibodies is a reliable method that can identify lung transplant recipients at increased risk for high-grade and persistent-recurrent acute rejection. Although bronchiolitis obliterans appears as a point of no return in the evolution of lung-transplanted patients, early detection of risk factors for acute rejection could indirectly decrease the incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans. These lung-transplanted patients may benefit from an altered strategy of immunosuppression.     

Frequency and clinical implications of development of donor-specific and non-donor-specific HLA antibodies after kidney transplantation

The involvement of immunologic and nonimmunologic events in long-term kidney allograft failure is difficult to assess. The development of HLA antibodies after transplantation is the witness of ongoing reactivity against the transplant, and several studies have suggested that the presence of HLA antibodies correlates with poor graft survival. However, they have not discriminated between donor-specific (DS) and non-specific (NDS) antibodies. A total of 1229 recipients of a kidney graft, transplanted between 1972 and 2002, who had over a 5-yr period a prospective annual screening for HLA antibodies with a combination of ELISA, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and flow cytometry tests were investigated; in 543 of them, the screening was complete from transplantation to the fifth year postgrafting. Correlations were established between the presence and the specificity of the antibodies and clinical parameters. A total of 5.5% of the patients had DS, 11.3% had NDS, and 83% had no HLA antibodies after transplantation. NDS antibodies appeared earlier (1 to 5 yr posttransplantation) than DS antibodies (5 to 10 yr). In multivariate analysis, HLA-DR matching, pretransplantation immunization, and acute rejection were significantly associated with the development of both DS and NDS antibodies and also of DS versus NDS antibodies. The presence of either DS or NDS antibodies significantly correlated with lower graft survival, poor transplant function, and proteinuria. Screening of HLA antibodies posttransplantation could be a good tool for the follow-up of patients who receive a kidney transplant and allow immunosuppression to be tailored.     

The presence of HLA-directed antibodies after heart transplantation is associated with poor allograft outcome

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of HLA-directed antibodies newly detected after transplantation (HT) is controversial. METHODS: Seventy-one HT recipients consented to enroll. Mean follow-up time was 28 months (range 6-48). Panel reactive antibody (PRA) analysis was performed on posttransplant sera (2 weeks, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter) using Flow-PRA. A mean of 6.9+/-1.2 serum samples per patient were obtained. Severity of cellular rejection was measured using the ISHLT grading system. Coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies were performed annually to evaluate severity of allograft vasculopathy. RESULTS: Twenty-five recipients had newly detected HLA-directed antibodies during the first year postHT. HLA class I antibodies were detected in 18 patients (25.4%), and class II in 11 patients (15.5%). The majority of donor recipient pairs were HLA mismatched (4.6+/-1.2 of the six major HLA antigens). Only mismatches at HLA-A locus had significant association with de novo posttransplant antibody formation. Length of ischemia time was correlated with early and sustained presence of de novo HLA-directed antibodies postheart transplant. Importantly, an association between de novo HLA-directed antibodies and cellular rejection was notes (P=0.0002). De novo HLA class II directed antibodies are also associated with IVUS documented vasculopathy (P<0.002). Finally, death due to allograft failure is associated with the presence of de novo formed HLA class II directed antibodies (P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Identifying the formation of de novo HLA-directed antibodies following heart transplantation may predict allograft outcome. This, in turn, may serve as a tool for individualization of immunosuppression protocols in heart transplant recipients.     

All chronic rejection failures of kidney transplants were preceded by the development of HLA antibodies

BACKGROUND: Recent studies show that almost all patients who have rejected a kidney transplant had human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. In this study, we sought to determine whether patients develop HLA antibodies before chronic rejection. METHODS: For the past 8 years, 139 patients who had undergone kidney transplantation were systematically examined, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based method, for the development of class-I and class-II HLA antibodies 3 months, 6 months, and yearly after transplantation. Chronic rejection was diagnosed by biopsy. RESULTS: Among 29 patients with chronic rejection, 100% of the patients had HLA antibodies before rejection. Of these patients, 14 patients developed antibodies de novo. In contrast, among 110 patients with stable function, 27% of the patients developed HLA antibodies posttransplant (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HLA antibodies were found in 29 consecutive cases of chronic rejection failures as much as one year before the loss of grafts. We conclude that HLA antibodies may be a prerequisite for chronic immunologic rejection.     

Novel insights into pretransplant allosensitization in heart transplant recipients in the contemporary era of immunosuppression and rejection surveillance

Solid‐phase assays (SPA) have facilitated detection and definition of antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and major histocompatibility complex class I chain‐related antigen A (MICA). However, clinical consequences of pretransplant SPA results in heart transplantation have been studied insufficiently in the current era of immunosuppression and rejection surveillance. Pretransplant sera, panel‐reactive antibodies (PRA), pretransplant crossmatch, and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed in 264 adult heart transplant recipients. The specificity of HLA and MICA antibodies and C1q‐binding activity of donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) were defined using SPA. Pretransplant HLA antibodies were detected in 57 (22%) individuals, in 28 individuals (11%); these antibodies were DSA after transplant. Preformed DSA and elevated peak PRA were independent predictors of pathologic AMR, which occurred in 19 individuals (7%). The increasing number of DSA and the cumulative mean fluorescence intensity of DSA were associated with AMR. C1q‐binding assay was a suboptimal predictor of AMR in our cohort. Pretransplant allosensitization and MICA antibodies were related neither to impaired graft survival nor to other adverse clinical events during a median follow‐up of 39 months. Identification of preformed DSA by SPA, in addition to PRA monitoring, may predict AMR in the contemporary era of heart transplantation.     

Alloimmune risk assessment for antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: A practical proposal

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. Although an improvement in graft survival has been observed in the last decades with the use of different immunosuppressive drugs, this is still limited in time with antibody-mediated rejection being a main cause of graft-loss. Immune monitoring and risk assessment of antibody-mediated rejection before and after kidney transplantation with useful biomarkers is key to tailoring treatments to achieve the best outcomes. Here, we provide a review of the rationale and several accessible tools for immune monitoring, from the most classic to the modern ones. Finally, we end up discussing a practical proposal for alloimmune risk assessment in kidney transplantation, including histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA antibodies, HLA molecular mismatch analysis and characterization of peripheral blood immune cells.     

The clinical impact of donor-specific antibodies in heart transplantation

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are integral to the development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Chronic AMR is associated with high mortality and an increased risk for cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Anti-donor HLA antibodies are present in 3–11% of patients at the time of heart transplantation (HTx), with de novo DSA (predominantly anti-HLA class II) developing post-transplant in 10–30% of patients. DSA are associated with lower graft and patient survival after HTx, with one study suggesting a three-fold increase in mortality in patients who develop de novo DSA (dnDSA). DSA against anti-HLA class II, notably DQ, are at particularly high risk for graft loss. Although detection of DSA is not a criterion for pathologic diagnosis of AMR, circulating DSA are found in almost all cases of AMR. MFI thresholds of ~5000 for DSA against class I antibodies, 2000 against class II antibodies, or an overall cut-off of 5?6000 for any DSA, have been suggested as being predictive for AMR. There is no firm consensus on pre-transplant strategies to treat HLA antibodies, or for the elimination of antibodies after diagnosis of AMR. Minimizing the risk of dnDSA is rational but data on risk factors in HTx are limited. The effect of different immunosuppressive regimens is largely unexplored in HTx, but studies in kidney transplantation emphasize the importance of adherence and maintaining adequate immunosuppression. One study has suggested a reduced risk for dnDSA with rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction. Management of DSA pre- and post-HTx varies but typically most centers rely on a plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption, with or without rituximab and/or intravenous immunoglobulin. Based on the literature and a multi-center survey, an algorithm for a suggested surveillance and therapeutic strategy is provided.