A phase 1 antigen dose escalation trial to evaluate safety,tolerability and immunogenicity of the leprosy vaccine candidate LepVax (LEP-F1 + GLA–SE) in healthy adults

Healthy United States-based adult volunteers with no history of travel to leprosy-endemic countries were enrolled for the first-in-human evaluation of LepVax (LEP-F1 + GLA-SE). In total 24 volunteers participated in an open-label clinical trial, with 21 receiving three injections of LepVax consisting of either 2 µg or 10 µg recombinant polyprotein LEP-F1 mixed with 5 µg of the GLA-SE adjuvant formulation. LepVax doses were provided by intramuscular injection on Days 0, 28, and 56, and safety was evaluated for one year following the final injection. LepVax was safe and well tolerated at both antigen doses. Immunological analyses indicated that similar LEP-F1-specific antibody and Th1 cytokine secretion (IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF) were induced by each of the antigen doses evaluated within LepVax. This clinical trial of the first defined vaccine candidate for leprosy demonstrates that LepVax is safe and immunogenic in healthy subjects and supports its advancement to testing in leprosy-endemic regions.     

Effects of measles-containing vaccination in children with severe underlying neurologic disease

BackgroundMeasles outbreaks pose significant risk for those unvaccinated.Patients and methodsMeasles-containing vaccine was offered to unvaccinated children with severe neurologic diseases during a measles outbreak. Vaccination adverse events were reported by parents 30 days following vaccination. Long term effects were evaluated 12 months post vaccination.ResultsTwenty-seven children were vaccinated (36 doses given). Half of parents (51.8%) reported no adverse events following immunization. Adverse events included afebrile seizures (6/36), fever alone (5/36) and febrile seizures (5/36). Two children required hospitalization. Quadrivalent measles-containing vaccine combined with varicella was associated with febrile seizures (p = 0.04). No child needed adjustment of the anti-epileptic treatment or exhibited developmental regression.ConclusionIn a series of children with prior severe neurologic disease, the safety-tolerability profile of vaccines containing a measles vaccine component suggests that vaccination is justified. Main side effect was seizure aggravation in children with known epileptic disease.     

Preclinical evaluation of an investigational 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine,V116, in adult-rhesus monkey,rabbit, and mouse models

Despite the widespread effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on the overall incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease, the global epidemiological landscape continues to be transformed by residual disease from non-vaccine serotypes, thus highlighting the need for vaccines with expanded disease coverage. To address these needs, we have developed V116, an investigational 21-valent non-adjuvanted pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), containing pneumococcal polysaccharides (PnPs) 3, 6A, 7F, 8, 9N, 10A, 11A, 12F, 15A, 16F, 17F, 19A, 20, 22F, 23A, 23B, 24F, 31, 33F, 35B, and a de-O-acetylated 15B (deOAc15B) individually conjugated to the nontoxic diphtheria toxoid CRM197 carrier protein. Preclinical studies evaluated the immunogenicity of V116 in adult monkeys, rabbits, and mice. Following one dose, V116 was found to be immunogenic in preclinical animal species and induced functional antibodies for all serotypes included in the vaccine, in addition to cross-reactive functional antibodies to serotypes 6C and 15B. In these preclinical animal studies, the increased valency of V116 did not result in serotype-specific antibody suppression when compared to lower valent vaccines V114 or PCV13. In addition, when compared with naïve controls, splenocytes from V116 to immunized animals demonstrated significant induction of CRM197-specific T cells in both IFN-γ and IL-4 ELISPOT assays, as well as Th1 and Th2 cytokine induction through in vitro stimulation assays, thus suggesting the ability of V116 to engage T cell dependent immune response pathways to aid in development of memory B cells. V116 also demonstrated significant protection in mice from intratracheal challenge with serotype 24F, a novel serotype not contained in any currently licensed vaccine.     

Long-term immunogenicity and safety of the hepatitis B vaccine HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B) compared with HepB-Eng (Engerix-B) in adults with chronic kidney disease

BackgroundHepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a significant global burden, especially for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving hemodialysis. Three doses of HepB–CpG (HEPLISAV-B® vaccine) induced a superior immune response compared with 4 double doses of HepB–Eng (Engerix-B®) in a phase 3 trial (HBV-17) in adults with CKD. Here we report the long-term immunogenicity and safety of HepB-CpG and HepB–Eng in eligible participants of HBV-17 who enrolled in this optional 34-month follow-up trial (HBV-19).MethodsHBV-19 is a multicenter, open-label, phase 3b trial of adults with CKD who previously received a complete series of HepB-CpG or HepB-Eng in the HBV-17 trial. Participants were assigned to seroprotection categories at enrollment on the basis of their antibody response to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) in HBV-17. The objective was to evaluate the durability of seroprotection (defined as an anti-HBs concentration ≥ 10 mIU/mL) induced by HepB-CpG and HepB-Eng. Participants whose anti-HBs concentration was below 10 mIU/mL received additional HepB-CpG or HepB-Eng doses.Results147 participants were enrolled; 66.7 % were men, median age was 65.0 years, and 83.7 % were white. The durability of seroprotection in participants with CKD was similar in those who received HepB-CpG and those who received HepB-Eng. Antibody concentrations ≥ 100 mIU/mL persisted for longer in HepB-CpG than HepB-Eng recipients, among those with anti-HBs ≥ 100 mIU/mL post vaccination. The geometric mean anti-HBs concentration in the HepB-CpG group was significantly higher than in the HepB-Eng group over time (P ≤ 0.0001). The safety profiles were similar between the vaccine groups.ConclusionsDue to the higher antibody levels induced by HepB-CpG in participants with CKD, seroprotection against HBV may be expected to persist longer than that induced by HepB-Eng. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01282762.     

Robust antibody response after a third BNT162b2 vaccine compared to the second among immunocompromised and healthy individuals,a prospective longitudinal cohort study

PurposeAs protection from COVID-19 following two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine showed a time dependent waning, a third (booster) dose was administrated. This study aims to compare the antibody response following the third dose versus the second and to evaluate post-booster seroconversion.MethodsA prospective observational study conducted in Maccabi Healthcare Services. Serial SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG tests, 1,2,3 and 6 months following the second vaccine dose and one month following the third were obtained. Neutralizing antibody levels were measured in a subset of participants. Per individual SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG titer ratios were calculated one month after the booster administration compared to titers one month following the second dose and prior to booster.ResultsAmong 110 participants, 56 (51%) were women. Mean age was 61.7 ± 1.9 years and 66 (60%) were immunocompromised. One month after third dose, IgG titers were induced 7.83 (95 %CI 5.25–11.67) folds and 2.40 (95 %CI 1.90–3.03) folds compared to one month after the second, in the immunocompromised and immunocompetent groups, respectively. Of the 17 immunocompromised participants who were seronegative after the second dose, 4 (24%) became seropositive following the third. Comparing the titers prior to the third dose, an increase of 50.7 (95 %CI 32.5–79.1) fold in the immunocompromised group and 25.7 (95 %CI 19.1–34.7) fold in and immunocompetent group, was observed.ConclusionA third BNT162b2 vaccine elicited robust humoral response, superior to the response observed following the second, among immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals.     

High-dose influenza vaccines for the prevention of hospitalization due to cardiovascular events in older adults in the nursing home: Post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomized trial

Older adults are at high risk of major acute cardiovascular events (MACE) linked to influenza illness and preventable by influenza vaccination. It is unknown whether high-dose vaccine might incrementally reduce the risk of MACE. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of data collected from a pragmatic cluster randomized study of 823 nursing homes (NH) randomized to standard-dose (SD) or high-dose (HD) influenza vaccine in the 2013–14 season. Adults age 65 year or older who are Medicare-enrolled long-stay residents were included in the analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in hospitalization for MACE, acute coronary syndromes (ACS), stroke or heart failure between the HD and SD arms. However, in the fee-for-service group, participants in the HD arm had significantly decreased risk of hospitalization for respiratory problems, which was not observed in the Medicare Advantage group. High-dose influenza vaccine was not shown to be incrementally protective against MACE relative to standard-dose vaccine.     

Cost-effectiveness of a 3-antigen versus single-antigen vaccine for the prevention of hepatitis B in adults in the United States

ObjectivesThe first 3-antigen hepatitis B vaccine was approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration in November 2021 and was recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2022. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of this 3-antigen vaccine (PreHevbrio™) relative to the single-antigen vaccine, Engerix-B^TM, to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among US adults.MethodsA cost-effectiveness model was developed using a combined decision-tree and Markov structure to follow 100,000 adults over their remaining lifetimes after vaccination with either the 3-antigen or single-antigen vaccine. Outcomes from societal and healthcare sector perspectives were calculated for adults aged 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years; adults with diabetes; and adults with obesity. Seroprotection rates were obtained from the phase 3, head-to-head PROTECT trial (NCT03393754). Incidence, vaccine costs, vaccine adherence rates, direct and indirect costs, utilities, transition probabilities, and mortality were obtained from published sources. Health outcomes and costs (2020 USD) were discounted 3% annually and reported by vaccine and population. One-way sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted.ResultsIn the model, the 3-antigen vaccine led to fewer HBV infections, complications, and deaths compared with the single-antigen vaccine in all modeled populations due to higher rates and faster onset of seroprotection. Compared with the single-antigen vaccine, the 3-antigen vaccine had better health outcomes, more quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and lower costs in adults aged 18–64 years, adults with diabetes, and adults with obesity (dominant strategy). For adults aged ≥65 years, the 3-antigen vaccine was cost-effective compared with the single-antigen vaccine ($26,237/QALY gained) below common willingness-to-pay thresholds ($50,000-$100,000/QALY gained). In sensitivity analyses, results were sensitive to vaccine cost per dose, incidence, and age at vaccination.ConclusionThe recently approved 3-antigen vaccine is a cost-saving or cost-effective intervention for preventing HBV infection and addressing the long-standing burden of hepatitis B among US adults.     

A randomized phase 3 trial of the immunogenicity and safety of coadministration of a live-attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine (TAK-003) and an inactivated hepatitis a (HAV) virus vaccine in a dengue non-endemic country

BackgroundVaccination against hepatitis A virus (HAV) is largely recommended for travelers worldwide. Concurrent dengue and HAV vaccination may be desired in parallel for travelers to countries where both diseases are endemic. This randomized, observer-blind, phase 3 trial evaluated coadministration of HAV vaccine with tetravalent dengue vaccine (TAK-003) in healthy adults aged 18–60 years living in the UK.MethodsParticipants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive HAV vaccine and placebo on Day 1, and placebo on Day 90 (Group 1), TAK-003 and placebo on Day 1, and TAK-003 on Day 90 (Group 2), or TAK-003 and HAV vaccine on Day 1, and TAK-003 on Day 90 (Group 3). The primary objective was non-inferiority of HAV seroprotection rate (anti-HAV ≥ 12.5 mIU/mL) in Group 3 versus Group 1, one month post-first vaccination (Day 30) in HAV-naïve and dengue-naïve participants. Sensitivity analyses were performed on combinations of baseline HAV and dengue serostatus. Secondary objectives included dengue seropositivity one month post-second vaccination (Day 120), HAV geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and safety.Results900 participants were randomized. On Day 30, HAV seroprotection rates were non-inferior following coadministration of HAV and TAK-003 (Group 3: 98.7 %) to HAV administration alone (Group 1: 97.1 %; difference: ?1.68, 95 % CI: ?8.91 to 4.28). Sensitivity analyses including participants who were neither HAV-naïve nor DENV-naïve at baseline supported this finding. Anti-HAV GMCs on Day 30 were 82.1 (95 % CI: 62.9–107.1) mIU/mL in Group 1 and 93.0 (76.1–113.6) mIU/mL in Group 3. By Day 120, 90.9–96.8 % of TAK-003 recipients were seropositive (neutralizing antibody titer > 10) to all four dengue serotypes. Coadministration of HAV vaccine and TAK-003 was well tolerated, with no important safety risks identified.ConclusionImmune responses following coadministration of HAV vaccine and TAK-003 were non-inferior to administration of HAV vaccine alone. The results support the coadministration of HAV vaccine and TAK-003 with no adverse impact on immunogenicity, safety, and reactogenicity of either vaccine.ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03525119.     

Safety and immunogenicity studies in animal models support clinical development of a bivalent norovirus-like particle vaccine produced in plants

Noroviruses (NoV) are the leading cause of epidemic acute gastroenteritis in humans worldwide. A safe and effective vaccine that prevents NoV infection or minimizes NoV disease burden is needed, especially for children and the elderly who are particularly susceptible to NoV disease. A plant-based expression system (magnICON®) was used to manufacture two different virus-like particle (VLP) immunogens derived from human NoV genogroups I and II, genotype 4 (GI.4 and GII.4), which were subsequently blended 1:1 (w/w) into a bivalent vaccine composition (rNV-2v). Here, we report on the safety and immunogenicity of rNV-2v from one pilot and two GLP-compliant toxicity studies in New Zealand White rabbits administered the vaccine subcutaneously (SC) or intramuscularly (IM). Strong genogroup-specific immune responses were induced by vaccination without adjuvant at various doses (200 to 400 μg VLP/administration) and administration schedules (Days 1 and 7; or Days 1, 15 and 29). The results showed sporadic local irritation at the injection site, which resolved over time, and was non-adverse and consistent with expected reactogenicity. There were no signs of systemic toxicity related to vaccine administration relative to vehicle-treated controls with respect to clinical chemistry, haematology, organ weights, macroscopic examinations, or histopathology. In a 3-administration regimen (n + 1 the clinical regimen), the NOAEL for rNV-2v via the SC or IM route was initially determined to be 200 μg. An improved GI.4 VLP variant mixed 1:1 (w/w) with the wild-type GII.4 VLP was subsequently evaluated via the IM route at a higher dose in the same 3-administration model, and the NOAEL was raised to 300 µg. Serology performed in samples of both toxicity studies showed significant and substantial anti-VLP-specific antibody titers for rNV-2v vaccines administered via the IM or SC route, as well as relevant NoV blocking antibody responses. These results support initiation of clinical development of the plant-made NoV vaccine.     

Hepatitis A antibody persistence 8 and 10 years after 1-dose and 2-dose vaccination in children from Panama

BackgroundHepatitis A virus (HAV) remains a global public health concern, which is potentially growing in Latin America, due to an expected shift from high to intermediate endemicity levels. The use of HAV vaccines in pediatric national immunization programs (NIPs), either as a 2-dose or a 1-dose schedule, has been explored in Latin American countries; however, evidence demonstrating long-term protection in this population is limited in the region. We evaluated long-term antibody persistence following a 1-dose partial series and the recommended 2-dose schedule used in Panama’s pediatric NIP.MethodsTwo independent cross-sectional serological surveys were conducted at year 8 (Y8) and Y10 following vaccination under the NIP with 1 or 2 doses of an inactivated HAV vaccine (Havrix, GSK). Seropositivity (anti-HAV antibody concentration ≥ 15 mIU/mL) rates and antibody geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) were assessed at each serosurvey. Non-inferiority of 1 dose versus 2 doses was also explored.ResultsThis study (NCT02712359) included 600 and 599 children at Y8 and Y10 post-vaccination, respectively. Seropositivity rates were 74.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.0; 79.2) and 97.7% (95% CI: 95.3; 99.1) at Y8 and 71.9% (95% CI: 66.4; 76.9) and 96.3% (95% CI: 93.5; 98.2) at Y10, in the 1-dose and 2-dose groups, respectively. Antibody GMCs were lower in the 1-dose versus the 2-dose group in both surveys. Non-inferiority was not demonstrated since the lower limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the between-group difference in seropositivity rates (1-dose minus 2-dose) was < ?10%.ConclusionAnti-HAV antibody persistence was observed in lower percentages of children receiving 1 dose versus 2 doses of Havrix, at 8 and 10 years post-vaccination in Panama. Further investigations are needed to confirm antibody persistence and conclude on the protection afforded beyond 10 years in the pediatric population in Latin America.     

A phase 1, randomized,observer blind,antigen and adjuvant dosage finding clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an adjuvanted,trivalent subunit influenza vaccine in adults ≥ 65 years of age

ObjectiveTo assess the safety and immunogenicity of the MF59®-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV; Fluad®) compared with modified aTIV formulations.MethodsA total of 196 subjects ≥ 65 years were randomized to receive 7 different formulations of vaccine containing a range of adjuvant and antigen doses by single injection, or divided into two injections at a single time point. The primary study objective was to compare the serologic response of different formulations of aTIV containing increased amounts of adjuvant and antigen 21 days after vaccination. Subjects were followed for immunogenicity and safety for one year.ResultsThe highest immune response, as measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay, 3 weeks after vaccination was observed in subjects in Group 6 with GMT 382.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 237.5 to 615.0), 552.3 (364.8 to 836.1), and 54.1 (36.9 to 79.4) against A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B respectively. Rates of seroconversion were also generally highest in this treatment group: 75% (95% CI 55.1 to 89.3), 75% (55.1 to 89.3), and 42.9% (24.5 to 62.8), respectively, against A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B strains. The highest incidence of solicited adverse events (AEs) was reported by subjects who received both the highest dosage of antigen in combination with the highest dosage of adjuvant at the same site: 67.9% and 57.1% in Groups 4 and 6, respectively. The majority of solicited AEs were mild to moderate in severity. The number of unsolicited AEs was similar across the different dosages.ConclusionIn this phase I trial of adults ≥ 65 years of age who received increased adjuvant and antigen dosages relative to the licensed aTIV, increased dosage of MF59 resulted in increased immunogenicity against all 3 components of seasonal influenza vaccine. The increase in immunogenicity was accompanied by an increase in the incidence of local reactogenicity.     

Impact of patient and provider nudges on addressing herpes zoster vaccine series completion

ObjectivesTo determine the combined impact of provider-facing and text message-based, patient nudges on herpes zoster vaccine series completion.MethodsFollowing a period during which Kroger Health implemented provider facing nudges, select US patients that initiated herpes zoster vaccination were randomized to receive timed text messages when the second dose was due and available as part of a quality improvement exercise. Main comparisons were between patients intervened by provider nudge only and those intervened by both provider and patient nudges. Data were assessed by GEE-based logistic and linear regression, controlling for available patient- and store-level characteristics, and geospatial analyses.ResultsDuring the baseline period, 100,627 adults received at least one HZ vaccine dose and 83.9% completed the series within 6 months over 88.6 days (SD: 26.53) on average. In the intervention period, 120,339 adults were vaccinated at least once and series completion was 88.3% (both provider nudges and text messaging) and 85.3% (not texted) during this observation window (both p < 0.0001). Time between doses was shorter for those who received text messages compared to both the baseline period and those in the intervention period that were not texted (both p < 0.001). Controlling for multiple characteristics, the odds of completion improved in the intervention period compared to baseline (OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.033–1.111), but a noticeably higher completion odds was observed amongst patients who received a text message in the intervention period (OR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.286–1.414). Adjusting for patient and pharmacy factors, those who were texted received their second herpes zoster vaccine dose 8.6 days sooner (95% CI: ?9.08 - ?8.17, p < 0.0001) compared to those intervened by the provider nudge only.ConclusionThe combined use of clinical and patient-focused nudges is a simple mechanism by which pharmacies and other health care access points can address the multi-dose vaccine needs of diverse patient populations.     

Vaccination rates and adherence in premature infants before and after pneumococcal conjugate vaccine schedule change for term infants – A claims database analysis in Germany

BackgroundIn 2015, the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) changed the pneumococcal conjugate vaccination (PCV) schedule for mature infants from a 3+1 scheme (2, 3, 4, and 11–14 months of age) to a 2+1 scheme (2, 4, and 11–14 months of age). For premature infants, the 3+1 scheme remained. The aim of this study was to assess vaccination rates, completeness, and timeliness for PCV in premature infants before and after the modified recommendation.MethodsA retrospective claims data analysis using the “Institut für angewandte Gesundheitsforschung Berlin” Research Database was conducted. Premature infants born in 2013 and 2016 with an individual follow-up of 24 months were included. Hexavalent combination (HEXA) vaccination with a consistent 3+1 recommendation for mature and premature infants was analyzed as reference vaccination.ResultsAfter 24 months, the PCV rate for at least one dose remained stable in premature newborns of 2016 compared to 2013, while the HEXA vaccination rate increased slightly. However, a significant decrease of a completed PCV schedule (4 doses) in premature infants was noted, whereas the completeness of HEXA vaccination did not change. The timeliness of PCV in premature newborns increased for the first and the booster PCV, while the timeliness of HEXA immunization did not change from 2013 to 2016.ConclusionAlthough STIKO still recommends a 3+1 PCV schedule for premature infants in Germany, premature infants were vaccinated according to the changed recommendations for mature born infants. A substantial share of premature infants remained unvaccinated, and their vaccinations were often delayed.     

Immunogenicity and safety of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in children aged 2–5 years in China

BackgroundThe widespread use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) has significantly decreased pneumococcal disease worldwide. However, China has not adopted PCVs in their national immunization schedules and had only approved these vaccines for children aged 2–15 months by 2020.MethodsIn an open-label trial, enrolled healthy children aged 2–5 years old were randomized 1:1 and divided into a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) group and a Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (Hib) group. Children in the PCV7 group received a single dose of PCV7, and the Hib group received a single dose of Hib vaccine. Blood samples were collected before and 6 months after vaccination. Immunogenicity and safety of PCV7 were assessed at prespecified time points.ResultsSix months after a single dose of PCV7, children in the PCV7 group for all 7 serotypes, IgG mean concentrations (GMCs) and opsonophagocytic geometric mean titres (GMTs) were significantly higher (P < .001) than at baseline, and the proportion of IgG ≥ 0.35 µg/mL ranged from 90.0% to 100%. Although the antibody level increased with age, preexisting antibodies did not induce hyporesponsiveness to PCV7. In the Hib group, the antibody levels were not significantly different or had changed slightly at 6 months. PCV7 was well tolerated in all age groups, and no serious adverse events (AEs) emerged during this study.ConclusionsA single dose of PCV7 was immunogenic and safe for Chinese children aged 2–5 years, and the preexisting antibodies against the PCV7 serotypes did not change the response to vaccination. The findings supported the effectiveness of PCV7 in this age group. PCVs with broader serotype coverage are expected to expand pneumococcal disease protection.     

Long-term control of Coxiellosis in sheep by annual primary vaccination of gimmers

Coxiella (C.) burnetii, a Gram-negative intracellular bacterium, causes Q fever in humans and Coxiellosis in animals. Ruminants are a primary source of human infection with C. burnetii. In 2013, vaccination was implemented in a sheep flock with 650 ewes associated with two outbreaks of Q fever in humans in 2008 and 2012. Only gimmers (yearlings) received two doses of a commercial C. burnetii phase I whole cell vaccine three weeks apart (primary vaccination) without any revaccination. Vaginal and nasal swabs collected shortly after lambing were tested by qPCR. Additionally, a group of non-vaccinated sentinels was serologically monitored for phase I (PhI), II (PhII) antibodies and for Interferon γ (IFN-γ) after stimulation of whole blood cells with PhII-antigen with and without an IL-10-neutralizing monoclonal antibody. In 2021, 679 sera collected in 2014–2021 were retested retrospectively with three commercial ELISA kits and one batch of an in-house PhI/PhII-ELISA.A low-level shedding of C. burnetii (<10³ mean C. burnetii/swab) was observed until 2014. In 2021 C. burnetii was detected in two animals (<10^3.1 C. burnetii/swab), but vaginal swabs collected at two subsequent lambing seasons remained negative. Seroconversion of sentinels was detected until 2017. However, the retrospective analysis of sentinels in 2021 revealed additional single seropositive animals from 2018 to 2021. IFN-γ reactivity was observed during the whole study period; it peaked in 2014 and in 2018 and decreased thereafter.The sporadic detection of C. burnetii and the immune responses of sentinels suggested that a subliminal infection persisted despite vaccination. Nevertheless, vaccination of gimmers prevented the development of a major outbreak, it controlled the infection and reduced the risk of human infection.     

Supporting National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups in the WHO European Region in developing national COVID-19 vaccination recommendations through online communication platform

National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups are groups of multi-disciplinary experts that provide scientific advice to policy makers to enable them to make informed immunization policy and programme decisions. NITAGs faced challenges using their routine approach to develop recommendations for COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic. In response, the WHO Regional Office for Europe (Regional Office), with the support of the Robert Koch Institute, developed an innovative approach of a series of webinars, provision of materials, and remote technical assistance to address these challenges. Polls conducted during webinars were used to tailor future webinars and evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. According to poll results, 76% of participants found the webinars and resources shared very useful in their work on COVID-19 vaccination. The Regional Office plans to build further upon the scope of online communication and establish a regional online platform for NITAGs to further support NITAGs and build capacity.     

Incidence rates of health outcomes of interest among Chinese children exposed to selected vaccines in Yinzhou Electronic Health Records: A population-based retrospective cohort study

IntroductionOral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) and diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) are widely used in China while Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines (Hib) and a DTaP, inactivated poliovirus (IPV) and Hib polysaccharide conjugated to tetanus protein (PRP ~ T) combined vaccine (DTaP–IPV//PRP ~ T) have lower coverage. There are limited safety data on these vaccines in Chinese pediatric populations. Methods: To estimate incidence rates (IRs) of health outcomes of interest (HOIs) among children exposed to OPV, DTaP, Hib, and DTaP–IPV//PRP ~ T, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using a population-based electronic health record (EHR) database in Yinzhou district, Ningbo City. Children 0–2 years of age receiving at least one dose of these vaccines between January 1, 2012 and March 31, 2017 were included in the study. Yinzhou EHR database consisted of immunization records and healthcare data of children from hospitals and community health centers in the district. Eight HOIs (i.e., anaphylaxis, febrile seizures, all seizures, asthma, apnea, Kawasaki disease [KD], urticaria/angioedema, Guillain–Barré syndrome [GBS]) were identified using ICD-10 codes. Results: A total of 220,422 eligible children was identified. No cases of apnea, KD, and GBS were observed within 7 days post-vaccination. During 0–7 days post-vaccination for OPV, DTaP, Hib, and DTaP–IPV//PRP ~ T, the IRs of anaphylaxis, febrile seizures, all seizures, urticaria/angioedema and asthma ranged from 0.0 to 50.0, 0.0 to 99.9, 29.1 to 249.8, 297.8 to 949.1, and 992.7 to 2298.2 per 100,000 person-years, respectively, and 0.0 to 0.9, 0.0 to 1.9, 0.6 to 4.6, 5.6 to 17.5, and 18.7 to 42.3 per 100,000 doses, respectively. Conclusion: IRs of some HOIs in our study were comparable with those in the literature while IRs of other HOIs were not due to differences in study design, post-vaccination risk periods assessed, and vaccine types. Future studies should consider medical chart review for validating HOIs obtained in the EHR.     

Efficacy and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in participants with a history of cancer: subgroup analysis of a global phase 3 randomized clinical trial

IntroductionIndividuals with an underlying malignancy have high risk of poor COVID-19 outcomes. In clinical trials, COVID-19 vaccines were safe and efficacious against infection, hospitalization, and death, but most trials excluded participants with cancer. We report results from participants with a history of past or active neoplasm (malignant or benign/unknown) and up to 6 months’ follow-up post-dose 2 from the placebo-controlled, observer-blinded trial of the 2-dose BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.Patients and methodsBetween July 2020–January 2021, 46,429 participants aged ≥ 12 years were randomized at 152 sites in 6 countries. Healthy participants with pre-existing stable neoplasm could participate; those receiving immunosuppressive therapy were excluded. Data are reported for participants, aged ≥ 16 years for safety and ≥ 12 years for efficacy, who had any history of neoplasm at baseline (data cut-off: March 13, 2021). Adverse-event (AE) data are controlled for follow-up time before unblinding and reported as incidence rates (IRs) per 100 person-years follow-up.ResultsAt baseline, 3813 participants had a history of neoplasm; most common malignancies were breast (n = 460), prostate (n = 362), and melanoma (n = 223). Four BNT162b2 and 71 placebo recipients developed COVID-19 from 7 days post-dose 2; vaccine efficacy was 94.4% (95% CI: 85.2, 98.5) after up to 6 months’ follow-up post-dose 2. This compares favorably with vaccine efficacy of 91.1% in the overall trial population after the same follow-up. AEs were reported at IRs of 95.4 (BNT162b2) and 48.3 (placebo) per 100 person-years. Most common AEs were reactogenicity events (injection-site pain, fatigue, pyrexia). Three BNT162b2 and 1 placebo recipients withdrew because of vaccine-related AEs. No vaccine-related deaths were reported.ConclusionIn participants with past or active neoplasms, BNT162b2 vaccine has a similar efficacy and safety profile as in the overall trial population. These results can inform BNT162b2 use during the COVID-19 pandemic and future trials in participants with cancer.Clinical trial number: NCT04368728.     

One or two doses of hepatitis A vaccine in universal vaccination programs in children in 2020: A systematic review

BackgroundHepatitis A virus (HAV) is a global health concern as outbreaks continue to occur. Since 1999, several countries have introduced universal vaccination (UV) of children against HAV according to approved two-dose schedules. Other countries have implemented one-dose UV programs since 2005; the long-term impact of this schedule is not yet known.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature search in four electronic databases for data published between January 2000 and July 2019 to assess evidence for one-dose and two-dose UV of children with non-live HAV vaccines and describe their global impact on incidence, mortality, and severity of hepatitis A, vaccine effectiveness, vaccine efficacy, and antibody persistence.ResultsOf 3739 records screened, 33 peer-reviewed articles and one conference abstract were included. Rapid declines in incidence of hepatitis A and related outcomes were observed in all age groups post-introduction of UV programs, which persisted for at least 14 years for two-dose and six years for one-dose programs according to respective study durations. Vaccine effectiveness was ≥95% over 3–5 years for two-dose programs. Vaccine efficacy was >98% over 0.1–7.5 years for one-dose vaccination. Antibody persistence in vaccinated individuals was documented for up to 15 years (≥90%) and ten years (≥74%) for two-dose and one-dose schedules, respectively.ConclusionExperience with two-dose UV of children against HAV is extensive, demonstrating an impact on the incidence of hepatitis A and antibody persistence for at least 15 years in many countries globally. Because evidence is more limited for one-dose UV, we were unable to draw conclusions on immune response persistence beyond ten years or the need for booster doses later in life. Ongoing epidemiological monitoring is essential in countries implementing one-dose UV against HAV. Based on current evidence, two doses of non-live HAV vaccines are needed to ensure long-term protection.