Spontaneous recovery from a spinal epidural hematoma with atypical presentation in a nonagenarian

PURPOSE: Spinal epidural hematoma following epidural anesthesia is extraordinarily rare in association with low-dose sc heparin, and the prognosis for neurologic recovery without rapid surgical decompression poor. We report a case of spinal epidural hematoma in a nonagenarian who received low-dose sc unfractionated heparin postoperatively in accordance with standard guidelines, presented with no back pain, and made full neurologic recovery without surgical intervention. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 90-yr-old female with gastric adenocarcinoma presented for subtotal gastrectomy. Her past medical history and physical examination were largely unremarkable and she had no bleeding diathesis. She took no medications other than preoperative ranitidine, and had a normal coagulation profile. A thoracic epidural catheter was placed uneventfully before induction of general anesthesia. Postoperatively, low-dose sc unfractionated heparin was started 12 hr after the epidural catheter insertion. On postoperative day two, the patient developed flaccid lower extremity paralysis and paresthesia without back pain. Her coagulation profile remained normal. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging showed a large epidural hematoma extending from T3 to T11. With conservative treatment and no surgery, the patient slowly made full neurologic recovery and was discharged home on postoperative day 56. CONCLUSION: Complete neurologic recovery from flaccid paralysis following spinal epidural hematoma occurred without surgical decompression in a nonagenarian. Low-dose sc heparin may be a greater risk factor for spinal epidural hematoma than previously assumed, and the absence of back pain does not rule out this diagnosis.     

Epidural hematoma following epidural catheter placement in a patient with chronic renal failure

PURPOSE: We report a case of epidural hematoma in a surgical patient with chronic renal failure who received an epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia. Symptoms of epidural hematoma occurred about 60 hr after epidural catheter placement. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 58-yr-old woman with a history of chronic renal failure was admitted for elective abdominal cancer surgery. Preoperative laboratory values revealed anemia, hematocrit 26%, and normal platelet, PT and PTT values. General anesthesia was administered for surgery, along with epidural catheter placement for postoperative analgesia. Following uneventful surgery, the patient completed an uneventful postoperative course for 48 hr. Then, the onset of severe low back pain, accompanied by motor and sensory deficits in the lower extremities, alerted the anesthesia team to the development of an epidural hematoma extending from T12 to L2 with spinal cord compression. Emergency decompressive laminectomy resulted in recovery of moderate neurologic function. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first case of epidural hematoma formation in a surgical patient with chronic renal failure (CRF) and epidural postoperative analgesia. The only risk factor for the development of epidural hematoma was a history of CRF High-risk patients should be monitored closely for early signs of cord compression such as severe back pain, motor or sensory deficits. An opioid or opioid/local anesthetic epidural solution, rather than local anesthetic infusion alone, may allow continuous monitoring of neurological function and be a prudent choice in high-risk patients. If spinal hematoma is suspected, immediate MRI or CT scan should be done and decompressive laminectomy performed without delay.     

Small risk of serious neurologic complications related to lumbar epidural catheter placement in anesthetized patients

Previous studies have identified pain during needle/catheter placement or during the injection of local anesthetic as a risk factor for the development of persistent paresthesias after regional anesthetic techniques. The performance of regional blockade on anesthetized patients theoretically increases the risk of postoperative neurologic complications, because these patients are unable to respond to painful stimuli. In this study, we evaluated the frequency of neurologic complications in 4298 thoracic surgical patients undergoing lumbar epidural catheter placement while under general anesthesia. Catheters were placed immediately after the induction and tracheal intubation or on completion of the surgical procedure, before emergence. Most epidural catheters (4220, or 98.2%) were used solely for postoperative analgesia; only 78 (1.8%) epidural catheters were used for intraoperative anesthesia. In 4239 (98.6%) patients, an opioid alone was administered. The remaining 56 (1.3%) patients received a local anesthetic or local anesthetic/opioid mixture epidurally. Analgesia was graded as excellent or good in 92.2% of patients. Side effects included sedation in 455 (10.6%), nausea or emesis in 328 (7.6%), pruritus in 116 (2.7%), and respiratory depression (pH or=50 mm Hg) in 308 (7.2%) patients. The mean duration of epidural analgesia was 2.4 +/- 0.8 days (range, 0-10.7 days). There were no neurologic complications, including spinal hematoma, epidural abscess or catheter site infections, radicular symptoms, or persistent paresthesias (95% confidence interval, 0%-0.08%). In one patient, the epidural catheter broke during removal, and a portion was retained. The patient was notified; no long-term sequelae were noted. Six patients developed new neurologic symptoms or postoperative worsening of a previous neurologic condition unrelated to epidural catheterization. We conclude that the risk of neurologic complications associated with lumbar epidural catheter placement in anesthetized patients is small. However, the relative risk of this practice, compared with epidural catheter placement in awake patients, is unknown. IMPLICATIONS: We report no neurologic complications in 4298 patients undergoing epidural catheter placement while under general anesthesia. Although the risk of neurologic complications associated with lumbar epidural catheter placement in anesthetized patients is small, the relative risk compared with epidural catheterization in awake patients is unknown.     

Incidence of Neurologic Complications Related to Thoracic Epidural Catheterization

Background: Due to potential neurologic sequelae, the risk:benefit ratio of thoracic epidural analgesia is controversial. Surprisingly, however, few available data address neurologic complications. The incidence of neurologic complications occurring after thoracic epidural catheterization was studied in patients scheduled for abdominal or abdominothoracic surgery.

Methods: A total of 4,185 patients were studied, including 2,059 during the prospective phase of the study and 2,126 during the retrospective phase. After thoracic epidural catheterization, all patients received general anesthesia. Patients' neurologic status was assessed by an anesthesiologist using clinical criteria after operation and after epidural catheter removal. If neurologic complications were suspected, a neurologist was consulted. The incidence of specific complications was compared for different thoracic puncture sites: upper (T3/4-6/7), mid (T7/8-8/9), and lower (T9/10-11/12) catheter insertion levels.

Results: The overall incidence of complications after thoracic epidural catheterization was 3.1% (n = 128). This included dural perforation (0.7%; n = 30); unsuccessful catheter placement (1.1%; n = 45); postoperative radicular type pain (0.2%; n = 9), responsive to catheter withdrawal in all cases; and peripheral nerve lesions (0.6%; n = 24), 0.3% (n = 14) of which were peroneal nerve palsies probably related to surgical positioning or other transient peripheral nerve lesions (0.2%; n = 10). No signs suggesting epidural hematoma were recognized, and there were no permanent sensory or motor defects attributable to epidural catheterization. Unintentional dural perforation was observed significantly more often in the lower (3.4%) than in the mid (0.9%), or upper (0.4%) thoracic region. A single patient experienced severe respiratory depression after receiving epidural buprenorphine but recovered without sequelae.     

Epidural hematoma after epidural block: implications for its use in pain management

BACKGROUND: Spinal epidural hematoma after spinal puncture such as for injection of steroids for pain management may result in a rare complication of a spinal epidural hematoma causing acute myelopathy. Although this complication is well known with epidural anesthesia, where it is usually seen with impaired hemostasis, there are surprisingly few case reports of epidural hematoma after an epidural steroid block. CASE DESCRIPTION: A healthy 34-year-old man with no evidence of coagulopathy and not taking antiplatelet medication suddenly had onset of acute cervical myelopathy from a large cervical epidural hematoma 8 days after a cervical epidural steroid block. Following prompt surgical evacuation of the clot, the patient made a near complete recovery. CONCLUSION: Spinal epidural hematoma after spinal puncture is usually associated with impaired hemostasis. This case illustrates that it may occur in the absence of known risk factors. The delayed onset and the absence of risk factors have implications for the use of this procedure in chronic pain management.     

Spinal cord compression caused by hematoma related to neuroaxial anesthesia in Spain

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord compression from a hematoma is a rare serious complication of neuroaxial anesthesia. Our objective was to investigate cases reported and published by Spanish authors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cases of spinal cord compression related to neuroaxial hematomas (epidural, subarachnoid, or both) reported at congreses and meetings in Spain or published in Medline-indexed journals from 1989 through December 2002 were reviewed. The clinical characteristics, risk factors, treatments, and outcomes were described for each case. RESULTS: Since 1996, when the first cases were reported, 20 cases in all have appeared: 8 related to sub-arachnoid anesthesia, 8 to epidural anesthesia, 1 to a combination, and 1 to diagnostic lumbar puncture. In 2 cases, the neuroaxial technique used was poorly defined. Factors that might have caused the complication could be identified in 11 cases, among which there were 7 cases of anesthetic puncture or manipulation of an epidural catheter during a period of hemorrhagic risk because of antithrombotic therapy. The hematoma was evacuated surgically in 11 cases, and medical treatment was provided in 9 cases. The neurologic outcome was satisfactory in 14 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The number of compressive spinal hematomas reported or published by Spanish authors is fairly high, and there are cases related to both sub-arachnoid and epidural anesthesia. Nonsurgical treatment was provided in 45% of the cases and the outcome was satisfactory in 70%. Risk factors were identified in over half of the reported cases.     

Epidural hematoma after catheter removal in a patient without coagulation disorders

A 69-year-old man with rectal adenocarcinoma and no relevant medical history was scheduled for anterior resection of the tumor under combined anesthesia. The epidural catheter was removed 48 h after surgery. A clinical picture consistent with a diagnosis of epidural hematoma developed gradually and was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. The last dose of low molecular weight heparin had been administered 8 h before catheter removal and blood analyses were normal. Recovery was complete following laminectomy and evacuation of the hematoma 31 h after the onset of symptoms. Our analysis of the literature on conditions leading to epidural hematoma after catheter insertion revealed that complications may appear for unknown reasons even when catheter management and thrombolytic prophylaxis are appropriate. Nevertheless, the maneuver for removing an epidural catheter is clearly not risk-free and can cause complications. Monitoring after removal is therefore important if complications are to be detected early.     

Spinal epidural hematoma and ankylosing spondylitis

A typical case of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a 53-year-old man illustrates the high risk of spinal injury. When compared to the healthy subjects, patients with ankylosing spondylitis are at risk even after trivial injury. Spinal epidural hematoma is rare and generally associated with significant osseous spinal column involvement. Although rare, hematoma should be considered in ankylosing spondylitis patients, when a patient develops progressive neurologic symptoms and signs. An aggressive approach, including early decompression, affords the best chance for recovery.     

Reversal of paraparesis after thoracic aneurysm repair by cerebrospinal fluid drainage

PURPOSE: To describe a case of reversal of delayed paraparesis, after an elective type I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair, via cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 75-yr-old woman developed paraparesis 13 hr after type I TAAA repair. The patient had been given combined regional and general anesthesia. There was no cerebrospinal fluid drain inserted at the time of surgery. The patient was hemodynamically stable throughout the procedure and was transported to the intensive care unit with trachea intubated and lungs ventilated. She demonstrated some initial lower limb paraparesis but had good recovery of limb function three hours after cessation of the epidural infusion. However, five hours and forty-five minutes after stopping the epidural, she was again paraparetic. Peripheral nerve injury, prolonged effects of epidural local anesthetic, and epidural hematoma were ruled out as precipitating factors. Cord ischemia was considered possible and a CSF catheter was inserted. Immediate improvement was seen upon catheter insertion and commencement of drainage, beginning with movement in the left toes and foot. Drainage was performed when the CFS pressure became > 15 mmHg. Motor function in the lower limbs continued to improve with each drainage extending to complete recovery after 40 hr. She was discharged home 11 days after surgery with no neurological deficit. CONCLUSION: Drainage of CSF was useful in treating a case of post-TAAA neurologic deficit.     

Delayed epidural hematoma after spinal surgery: a report of 4 cases

Symptomatic postoperative epidural hematoma is a rare and potentially devastating complication of spinal surgery. The overwhelming majority of reported cases have occurred in the immediate postoperative period. A recent publication defined the clinical entity of delayed postoperative epidural spinal hematoma as neurologic deterioration due to an epidural hematoma occurring at least 3 days after the index procedure. Only 2 such cases have been reported in the lumbar spine to date. Four cases of delayed postoperative spinal epidural hematoma were identified over a 6-year period among the spine surgeons at a single large academic institution. Each case involved the lumbar spine. The details of each patient's initial surgery, presentation, and hospital course were then gathered from a retrospective chart review. The 4 patients presented are unusual in their delayed symptomatic presentations of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma. Despite the longer time to onset, however, our patients exhibited many of the characteristics common to cases that presented in the acute postoperative period. The spine surgeon must remain vigilant for the possibility of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma in at-risk patients, even weeks after the original surgical procedure.     

Continuous epidural analgesia in the heparinized vascular surgical patient: a retrospective review of 912 patients

Nine hundred twelve patients received continuous epidural analgesia administered through an indwelling plastic catheter while undergoing vascular reconstruction of a lower extremity. During a portion of the operative event, the patients were totally, transiently anticoagulated with heparin. None of the patients had an untoward neurologic event that could be attributed to an epidural hematoma. Our results and those of others show that this form of regional analgesia is safe and far outweighs theoretic contraindications when anticoagulation with heparin is planned as a part of the operative event. In the patients with impaired pulmonary ventilation or a cardiac disorder, this method of analgesia offers many advantages over a general anesthetic, such as obviating aspiration pneumonitis and averting prolonged support in the recovery period after completion of the surgical procedure. The regional vasodilation ensuing from the epidural blockade is an additional advantage in patients undergoing vascular reconstruction for lower extremity ischemia.     

Incidence of epidural hematoma, infection, and neurologic injury in obstetric patients with epidural analgesia/anesthesia

Of the 4 million annual births in the United States, 2.4 million involve epidural analgesia. Serious adverse events are rare but are important in young women. Robust estimates for the risk of harm are not available. Data for superficial and deep infections, hematoma, and transient and permanent neurologic injury were obtained from studies reporting adverse events with obstetric epidural analgesia, and incidence presented as individual risk for a woman, number of events per million women, and percentage incidence. A total of 1.37 million women received an epidural for childbirth, reported in 27 articles. Most information (85% of women) was in larger (> 10,000 women) studies published after 1990, with risk estimates as follows: epidural hematoma, 1 in 168,000; deep epidural infection, 1 in 145,000; persistent neurologic injury, 1 in 240,000; and transient neurologic injury, 1 in 6,700. Earlier and smaller studies produced significantly higher risk estimates for transient neurologic injury plus injury of unknown duration.     

Hématome péridural chez une parturiente au décours ďun choc hémorragique

PURPOSE: Epidural hematoma is a rare but serious complication of epidural anesthesia. We report a case of epidural hematoma, occurring in an obstetric patient after the epidural catheter had been withdrawn accidentally after an episode of hemorrhagic shock leading to a hypocoagulable state. CLINICAL FEATURES: A patient had the epidural catheter inserted during labour when coagulation was normal. She had a postpartum hemorrhage with alteration of coagulation (platelets 16 x 10(-9) x L(-1), thrombin time: 85 sec. Vital signs returned to normal after a general anesthetic, transfusion of blood products, volume repletion and ligation of hypogastric arteries. It was then noticed that the epidural catheter had been withdrawn inadvertently while the patient was hypocoagulable. The patient then developed neurological signs consistent with spinal cord compression due to an epidural hematoma. A hematoma extending from T3 to L5 was diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging. Because the cord had minimal compression, no specific action was undertaken, other than clinical and radiological follow-up. There were no long-term sequelae. CONCLUSION: In the presence of an epidural hematoma, surgery for emergency cord decompression is usually required. Another option that receives increasing attention is to monitor neurological function, but the indications for this expectant treatment are not well defined.     

Thoracic epidurals in heart valve surgery: neurologic risk evaluation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of neurologic complications resulting from epidural hematoma in a series of patients who had surgery for repair or replacement of heart valves under combined general and thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: General reference hospital associated with a university. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 305) who had surgery for replacement or repair of heart valves. INTERVENTIONS: An epidural catheter was inserted at T1-3 as soon as the patient was in the operating room, and local anesthetic was administered as a bolus, then as a continuous infusion throughout the operation and postoperatively. A protocol for postoperative neurologic evaluation was used to rule out clinical signs of spinal lesions. A set of safety guidelines was routinely followed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preoperatively a battery of coagulation tests was systematically carried out: activated partial thromboplastin time, platelet count, and prothrombin time. Oral anticoagulants (warfarin) were stopped >60 hours before surgery, and antiplatelet drugs (aspirin) were stopped 7 days before. No patient required parenteral opiates postoperatively. Of the patients, 65% were extubated in the operating room. There were no neurologic complications resulting from epidural hematoma. CONCLUSION: TEA can provide effective postoperative analgesia and assist in early tracheal extubation in cardiac valve surgery. In this series, there were no neurologic deficits detected. When certain safety measures are taken, routine TEA is feasible and helpful in cardiac valve surgery.     

Severe neurological complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990-1999

BACKGROUND: Central neuraxial blockades find widespread applications. Severe complications are believed to be extremely rare, but the incidence is probably underestimated. METHODS: A retrospective study of severe neurologic complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990-1999 was performed. Information was obtained from a postal survey and administrative files in the health care system. During the study period approximately 1,260,000 spinal blockades and 450,000 epidural blockades were administered, including 200,000 epidural blockades for pain relief in labor. RESULTS:: The 127 complications found included spinal hematoma (33), cauda equina syndrome (32), meningitis (29), epidural abscess (13), and miscellaneous (20). Permanent neurologic damage was observed in 85 patients. Incidence of complications after spinal blockade was within 1:20-30,000 in all patient groups. Incidence after obstetric epidural blockade was 1:25,000; in the remaining patients it was 1:3600 (P < 0.0001). Spinal hematoma after obstetric epidural blockade carried the incidence 1:200,000, significantly lower than the incidence 1:3,600 females subject to knee arthroplasty (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:: More complications than expected were found, probably as a result of the comprehensive study design. Half of the complications were retrieved exclusively from administrative files. Complications occur significantly more often after epidural blockade than after spinal blockade, and the complications are different. Obstetric patients carry significantly lower incidence of complications. Osteoporosis is proposed as a previously neglected risk factor. Close surveillance after central neuraxial blockade is mandatory for safe practice.     

Functional recovery following surgical removal of traumatic epidural hematoma--factor analysis

Factors contributing to functional recovery following evacuation of epidural hematoma were analyzed in 53 subjects. Subjects were limited to the cases with "pure" epidural hematoma. Fifty-three cases were classified into 3 groups based on presence or absence, and duration of preaggravation period (PAP) following occurrence of head trauma (Fig. 1). Level of consciousness at operation and at PAP is summarised in Fig. 2. Major neurological signs at operation are summarized in Table 1. Gradings of functional status were divided to 6 (Table 2). Gradings of 53 subjects which were judged 1 month after removal of epidural hematoma are summarized in Fig. 3. Results: 1) As to outcome in relation to duration of preaggravation period (PAP) and consciousness level at operation (Fig. 4): The patients whose PAP was shorter and whose consciousness level at operation was more severe, took outcome of lower (worse) gradings. 2) As to outcome in relation to interval from the end of PAP to operation and PAP (Fig. 5): The patients whose PAP are within 3 hours, took outcome of relatively good recovery only when epidural hematoma was removed within 5.5 hours after the end of PAP. 3) As to outcome in relation to interval from the end of PAP to operation and consciousness level at operation (Fig. 6): The patients whose consciousness level at operation was better than semicoma took good recovery when epidural hematoma was evacuated within 5.5 hours after the end of PAP. This was right even in the patients who presented with decerebrate posture.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Use of single-dose epidural morphine in a patient undergoing an abdominal aortic aneurysm resection

To avoid possible trauma to the epidural venous plexus in a 56-year-old male who presented for abdominal aortic aneurysm resection, the authors preoperatively injected a single dose of epidural morphine rather than inserting an indwelling epidural catheter. The patient's intraoperative anesthetic requirements appeared to have been decreased, he was extubated shortly after the end of the procedure, and he experienced good postoperative analgesia. No untoward neurologic sequelae occurred. The authors feel that a single dose of epidural morphine, compared to epidural catheter placement when systemic heparinization is planned, decreases intraoperative anesthetic requirements, provides good postoperative analgesia, and may have the benefit of decreasing the possibility of epidural hematoma formation.     

Severe Neurological Complications after Central Neuraxial Blockades in Sweden 1990-1999

Background: Central neuraxial blockades find widespread applications. Severe complications are believed to be extremely rare, but the incidence is probably underestimated.

Methods: A retrospective study of severe neurologic complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990-1999 was performed. Information was obtained from a postal survey and administrative files in the health care system. During the study period approximately 1,260,000 spinal blockades and 450,000 epidural blockades were administered, including 200,000 epidural blockades for pain relief in labor.

Results: The 127 complications found included spinal hematoma (33), cauda equina syndrome (32), meningitis (29), epidural abscess (13), and miscellaneous (20). Permanent neurologic damage was observed in 85 patients. Incidence of complications after spinal blockade was within 1:20-30,000 in all patient groups. Incidence after obstetric epidural blockade was 1:25,000; in the remaining patients it was 1:3600 (P < 0.0001). Spinal hematoma after obstetric epidural blockade carried the incidence 1:200,000, significantly lower than the incidence 1:3,600 females subject to knee arthroplasty (P < 0.0001).     

Epidural hematoma following epidural analgesia in a patient receiving unfractionated heparin for thromboprophylaxis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The practice of providing postoperative epidural analgesia for patients receiving deep venous thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin is common. This case report is intended to heighten awareness of comorbid risk factors for epidural hematoma and to bring attention to the new ASRA consensus guidelines on the management of neuraxial anesthesia in the presence of standard heparin. CASE REPORT: A 79-year-old woman with apparently normal coagulation and receiving no antiplatelet agents required an abdominoperineal resection for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Approximately 2 hours after her preoperative dose of 5,000 U unfractionated heparin, an epidural catheter was placed on the third attempt. Subcutaneous heparin was subsequently administered every 12 hours. Her international normalized ratio became slightly elevated during surgery while the partial thromboplastin time and platelet count remained normal. The catheter was removed on postoperative day 3, 6 hours after the last dose of heparin. The patient developed signs of an epidural hematoma requiring surgical evacuation on postoperative day 4. The presence of previously undiagnosed spinal stenosis may have contributed to her symptoms. CONCLUSION: Management of postoperative epidural analgesia in the patient receiving thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin requires appropriate timing of epidural insertion and removal, monitoring of coagulation status and vigilance.     

Successful surgical management of a case of spontaneous epidural hematoma of the spine during pregnancy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A spontaneous epidural hematoma of the spine occurring during pregnancy is extremely rare. The development of a significant neurologic deficit may be rapid. Therefore, the neurosurgeon should be aware of the presentation, diagnosis and treatment options available. PURPOSE: The authors report a case of a spontaneous epidural hematoma of the spine during the third trimester of pregnancy, which was successfully managed with surgical evacuation. The case is unique in that the patient demonstrated a subacute presentation. STUDY DESIGN: The authors report a case of a 27-year-old primagravada presented with the subacute onset of progressive paraparesis. She became nonambulatory before admission. A magnetic resonance imaging study (MRI) demonstrated ventral epidural compression in the upper thoracic region. METHODS: A retrospective review of a case of spontaneous epidural hematoma of the spine during pregnancy was performed. The inpatient and outpatient charts were used to gather clinical information of the case, and the pertinent radiographs and images were reviewed. RESULTS: An urgent cesarean section was performed followed by evacuation of the epidural hematoma. The decompression was performed by means of a thoracic laminectomy with partial facetectomy. The patient had a prompt return of neurologic function. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous epidural hematoma of the spine should be suspected in the setting of acute back or neck pain with or without an associated progressive neurologic deficit. Spine surgeons and obstetricians should also recognize that a spinal epidural hematoma during pregnancy may also present subacutely, as illustrated in our case. Prompt diagnosis may be made with MRI, and evacuation of the hematoma should be performed, ideally before the onset of neurologic signs or symptoms. The prognosis for return of neurologic function is good after urgent evacuation.