Should kidneys from older cadaveric donors be age-matched to the recipient?

Persistent shortage of kidneys for transplantation has forced most transplant centers to include procurement and use of kidneys from older donors. It is not clear whether the optimal use of these kidneys involve age-matching to the recipient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of older cadaveric kidneys (>60 years), transplanted to young recipients (<50 years) and older recipients (>60 years). From 1989 through 2002, 252 first kidney grafts were procured from donors above the age of 60; 149 of the recipients to these grafts were above 60 years and 45 recipients were below 50. Minimum follow-up time was 12 months. Variables for waiting time to transplantation, DR mismatches, PRA, dialysis prior to transplantation, episodes of acute rejection, number of steroid-resistant rejections, creatinine levels, cold ischemia time, and causes of graft loss did not differ between the two groups. There was no significant difference in graft survival for young and older recipients receiving kidney from donors above 60 years of age. Graft survival at 1 year for young recipients was 90% and for older recipients 93% (NS). Five-year graft survival was 72% and 79%, respectively (NS). However, there was a significant positive effect on long-term graft survival if the donor kidney was less than 50 years. From our data, there is no evidence that age-matching of older donors has any beneficial effect on graft survival in kidney transplantation.     

Single-center experience with primary orthotopic liver transplantation with FK 506 immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy for primary orthotopic liver transplantation of a new immunosuppressive agent, FK 506 (tacrolimus, Prograf, Fujisawa USA, Deerfield, IL), was determined. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: After 3 years of preclinical research, a clinical trial of FK 506 for orthotopic liver transplantation was begun in February 1989, first as a rescue therapy for patients with intractable rejection with conventional immunosuppression, then as a primary drug. METHODS: Between August 1989 and December 1993, 1391 recipients (1188 adult and 203 pediatric) of primary liver allografts were treated with FK 506 from the outset. Results from these patients were analyzed and compared with those of 1212 historical control patients (971 adult and 241 pediatric) given cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. RESULTS: Actuarial survival at 4 years was 86.2% with FK 506 versus 65.5% with cyclosporine in the pediatric patients (p < 0.0000) and 71.4% versus 65.5% in the adults (p < 0.0005). The need for retransplantation was reduced significantly for FK 506 patients. Four-year graft survival was 77.0% with FK 506 versus 48.4% with cyclosporine in the pediatric patients (p < 0.0000), and 61.9% with FK 506 versus 51.4% with cyclosporine in the adult recipients (p < 0.0000). Regression analysis revealed that reduction in mortality or graft loss from uncontrollable rejection, sepsis, technical failure, and recurrent original liver disease were responsible for the improved results with FK 506 therapy. CONCLUSIONS: FK 506 is a potent and superior immunosuppressive agent for orthotopic liver transplantation.     

Renal transplant recipients over aged 60 have diminished immune activity and a low risk of rejection

Strict consideration of the renal transplant candidates chronologic age is generally supplanted by more subjective reflection on his (her) physiologic state. In the US, patients over 64 years old represented 9.0% of renal transplant recipients in the year 2000, yet little prior experience is available with which to guide the management of geriatric patients. Two hundred and forty six consecutive recipients of primary kidney transplants at the Yale–New Haven Organ Transplant Center between 1990 and 1995 were included in an outcome analysis. Age at transplantation ranged from 2 to 68 years; the study group consisted of the 16 (6.5%) over age 60. The immunosuppressive protocol was uniform for all patients. There was a disproportionately high use of cadaveric organs by older patients; only 1/16 (6.3%) received a living donor kidney. The overall rate of rejection within the first 90 days was 6.7% of cadaveric recipients over 60 versus 37.6% of younger recipients, P=0.001. Actual patient survival rates at 6 years were 100% of patients younger than 11 years versus 69% (11/16) of those older than 60 years. Death censored 5 year graft survival was 100% in older patients versus 85% among the younger patients. The older and younger patients received quantitatively equivalent immunosuppression, but acute rejection was uncommon in the former (6%) versus the younger cohort (34%). It seems logical to consider whether older renal transplant recipients may benefit from a less aggressive immunosuppression strategy.     

Predicting clinical outcome in the elderly renal transplant recipient

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate graft and patient survival in first-time kidney transplant recipients 60 years old or older, and to identify pretransplant risk factors that predict clinical outcome. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical course of 206 recipients, 60 years old or older, of first kidney transplants at the University of Minnesota. Patient and graft survival were compared with 1640 patients aged 18 to 59 transplanted during the same time period. Regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors that predicted a poor outcome. RESULTS: In patients 60 years old or older, graft survival at one and five years was 86 and 60%, and patient survival at one and five years was 90 and 68%, respectively. Graft and patient survival were decreased compared with recipients aged 18 to 59, but were similar when censored for patient death as a cause of graft loss. A pretransplant history of nonskin malignancy and vascular disease and a current smoking history were risk factors for decreased graft and patient survival. To determine the potential impact of screening for low-risk patients, we evaluated graft and patient survival in patients age > or =60 without these risk factors versus those with one or more risk factors. In the absence of risk factors, both graft and patient survival were significantly improved compared with patients with these risk factors and were equivalent to that of patients aged 18 to 59. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation is a safe and effective therapy for the older renal failure patient. In the absence of identified risk factors, graft survival is equivalent to that seen in younger patients.     

Kidney transplantation in children younger than 1 year using cyclosporine immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal age for transplantation in children with end-stage renal disease remains controversial. Supported by national data, many centers recommend dialysis until the child reaches a certain minimum age. The authors' policy, however, has been to encourage living donor (LD) transplants for young children, with no minimum age restriction. METHODS: Between January 1, 1984, and December 31, 1996, the authors performed 248 kidney transplants in children younger than age 13 years, using cyclosporine as the primary immunosuppressive agent. Recipients were analyzed in three age groups: group 1, younger than age 1 year (n = 26); group 2, age 1 through 4 (n = 92); and group 3, age 5 through 13 (n = 130). Almost all recipients in group 1 underwent a primary LD transplant. Therefore, to compare results more meaningfully among the three age groups, only primary LD transplants were analyzed (group 1, n = 25; group 2, n = 59; group 3, n = 58). RESULTS: In primary LD transplants, no significant difference was noted among the age groups in 1-and 5-year patient or graft survival rates. To date, all 25 recipients from group 1 are alive and well; 19 still have a functional original graft. Causes of graft loss in the remaining six recipients were chronic rejection (n = 3), vascular thrombosis (n = 2), and recurrent disease (n = 1). The incidence of acute rejection in group 1 recipients was lower than in the two older groups. However, the incidence of delayed graft function was slightly higher in the youngest group than in the two older groups. For recipients in group 1, growth (as measured by weight) improved significantly posttransplant: the mean standard deviation score rose from -2.8 pretransplant to -0.2 by age 5 and to +1.8 by age 10. The improvement in height was not as dramatic: the mean standard deviation score rose from -3.2 pretransplant to -1.6 by age 5 and to -1.4 by age 10. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation in young children, including those younger than 1 year old, can achieve results comparable to those in older children. As long as an adult LD is available, the timing of the transplant should be based on renal function rather than age.     

Orthotopic liver transplantation in patients 60 years of age and older

Cyclosporine appears to have abrogated age as a contraindication to kidney transplantation in the elderly, although it is unclear whether this is true for other types of solid organ transplantation. We performed a retrospective analysis of liver transplant recipients who were 60 years of age and older (n = 23) versus recipients of primary transplants who were 18 to 59 years of age (n = 84). Indications in recipients over 60 included alcoholism (6), postnecrotic cirrhosis (6), cancer (4), primary biliary cirrhosis (3), sclerosing cholangitis (2), and one patient with polycystic liver disease. There were no important differences in the initial transplant hospitalization or the incidence of infection and rejection between the two groups. No patient in the over-60 population required retransplantation. Actuarial patient survival is 83% at 2 years for recipients 60 years of age and above compared to 76% patient survival in adult recipients who are under the age of 60. Liver transplant recipients over the age of 60 years have excellent patient and graft survival and the same postoperative morbidity as recipients who are under 60 years of age. Therefore, advanced age does not appear to be a contraindication to orthotopic liver transplantation.     

Influence of age on the prognosis of renal transplant recipients

With aging, morphologic organ changes due to arteriosclerosis, hypertension, or diabetes increase, and renal transplantation tends to become less successful. We analyzed the outcome of transplantation in 123 recipients who underwent renal transplantation between January 1988 and December 1989. We assessed patient and graft survival after 1, 5, and 6 years as well as mortality and transplant failure and the incidence of rejections. We compared the results of patients aged under 60 years (group 1, n = 60) with the findings of patients aged over 60 years (group 2, n = 63). Immunosuppression was with cyclosporin A and prednisolone without exception. In patients under the age of 60, the overall patient survival at 1, 5, and 6 years was 97, 95, and 90% and was significantly compromised in recipients over the age of 60 (92, 80, and 75%). The 1-, 5- and 6-year graft survival rates were 92, 90, and 90% in recipients aged over 60 years and 88, 82, and 79% in recipients under the age of 60 years. The incidence of rejection was significantly higher in recipients under the age of 60. Patient mortality was mainly due to cardiovascular complications and transplant failure mainly related to transplant thrombosis. In older patients, renal transplantation is thought to be an option of survival rate improvement in comparison with hemodialysis. The incidence of transplant rejection is significantly lower, and this indicates a promising result regarding the long-term prognosis. As cardiovascular complications present as the main mortality factors of both transplant and patient, the prognosis is considered to be highly dependent on screening and treatment of these risk factors.     

A comparative analysis of outcome after heart transplantation in patients aged 60 years and older: the University of Alberta experience

BACKGROUND: The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) 2001 Annual Report indicated that the vast majority of heart transplant recipients are between 50 and 64 years of age. However, patient age beyond 60 years may have higher long-term mortality compared to younger patients. The purpose of this study was to compare short- and intermediate-term results including rates of acute rejection, transplant coronary artery disease, infections, malignancy, and mortality in cardiac transplant recipients 60 years or older with those below the age of 60 years. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the results of 50 patients aged 60 years and older who underwent heart transplantation at the University of Alberta from January 1990 to December 2000 and compared them with the results of 225 younger patients undergoing heart transplantation in the same time period. RESULTS: The older and younger groups had similar rates for treated acute rejection episodes (20.0% vs. 12.6%), transplant coronary artery disease (4.0% vs. 1.1%), and mortality (10.5% vs. 14.3%), respectively. No differences were noted with regards to quality and quantity of infection or malignancy rates. Five-year actuarial survival between the older and younger patients was also comparable at 89.5% vs.86.9% (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplantation in patients 60 years of age and older can be performed as successfully as in younger patients (< 60 years) with comparable morbidity and mortality, suggesting that patient age per se should not be an exclusion criterion for heart transplantation.     

A Lifetime of Allograft Function with Kidneys from Older Donors

Strategies to increase expanded criteria donor (ECD) transplantation are needed. We quantified the extent to which ECD kidneys provide recipients with a lifetime of allograft function by determining the difference between patient survival and death-censored allograft survival (graft survival). Initial analyses compared 5-year outcomes in the Eurotransplant Senior Program (European) and the United States Renal Data System. Among European recipients ≥65 years, patient survival exceeded graft survival, and ECD recipients returned to dialysis for an average of 5.2 months after transplant failure. Among United States recipients ≥60 years, graft survival exceeded patient survival. Although patient survival in elderly recipients in the United States was low (49% at 5 years), the average difference in patient survival at 10 years in elderly recipients in the United States with an ECD versus non-ECD transplant was only 7 months. The probability of patient survival with a functioning allograft at 5 years was higher with ECD transplantation within 1 year after activation to the waiting list than with delayed non-ECD transplantation ≥3 years after activation to the waiting list. Subsequent analyses demonstrated that ECD transplants do not provide a lifetime of allograft function in recipients <50 years in the United States. These findings should encourage ECD transplantation in patients ≥60 years, demonstrate that rapid ECD transplantation is superior to delayed non-ECD transplantation, and challenge the policy in the United States of allowing patients <50 years to receive an ECD transplant.     

Effect of donor age on the outcome of living-related kidney transplantation

The study compared the results of kidney transplantation from living-related donors older and younger than 60 years. The 273 kidney graft recipients were divided into group 1 (115 recipients of older grafts) and group 2 (158 recipients of younger grafts). The frequency of acute rejection (AR) episodes was similar in both groups but slow graft function occurred more frequently in group 1. The frequency of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in the first post-transplant year was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. Patient and graft survival was significantly worse in group 1. Risk factors for graft loss were the difference between donor and recipient age and AR. Donor age and graft function were risk factors for patient death. Although kidneys from older donors provide a statistically poorer transplant outcome, they are clinically acceptable, especially when waiting time is prolonged and access to dialysis limited.     

Use of marginal organs from non-heart-beating cadaveric kidney donors.

BACKGROUND: The severe shortage of cadaver donor kidneys for transplantation has prompted many centers to utilize older donor kidneys, which have been associated with lower graft survival rates. The aim of the present study was to examine the availability and feasibility of considering kidneys from donors over the age of 60. METHOD: We studied 252 cadaveric renal transplant recipients (156 males, 96 females) who received kidneys from uncontrolled non-heart-beating donors between 1987 and 1997. We performed in situ cooling with especially designed double-balloon catheters to minimize warm ischemic kidney damage. Recipients were classified according to donor age (age 60), and we examined graft survival rates. All patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year after transplantation. RESULTS: Graft survival rates for recipients of kidneys from the older donor group at 1, 5, and 10 years after transplantation were 77%, 37%, and 30%, respectively. Corresponding values for the younger donor kidney recipients were 87%, 64%, and 47%, respectively (P=0.0011). Improved survival rates were noted when older kidneys were used for lighter weight recipients (<54 kg). No other significant factors impacted on older donor graft survival rates. CONCLUSION: Older donor kidneys are associated with poorer graft survival rates. However, kidney transplants from older donors can be quite effective in lighter weight recipients (<54 kg).     

Renal transplantation in the elderly: a long-term, single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal failure increases with advancing age and renal transplantation should be considered in end-stage renal failure patients older than 60 years. However, there is a paucity of data on long-term patient and graft survival in this population. METHODS: From October 1983 to March 1999, 310 renal transplantations were performed at Geneva University Hospital in 283 patients, of which 49 were done in 48 patients older than 60 years (mean age 65.6+/-4.1 years). The following data were analysed at 1, 5, and 10 years, and compared between the patients >60 years and <60 years old: actuarial patient and graft survival, serum creatinine, causes of graft loss, and patient death. RESULTS: Patient survival at 10 years was 81% for patients <60 years and 44% for patients >60 years. Graft survival at 10 years was 59% for patients <60 years and 32% for patients >60 years. Graft survival at 10 years censored for death with functioning graft was 65% for patients <60 years and 81% for patients >60 years. Main causes of mortality in the older patients were related to cardiovascular events (47%), neoplasia (41%), and sepsis (18%). Overall, recipient and donor age were not predictive factors for graft survival, as shown by multiple logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation should be considered in patients older than 60 years, since graft survival is excellent in this population. Although these patients have a shorter life expectancy, they benefit from renal transplantation similarly to younger kidney transplant recipients.     

Lack of impact of donor age on patient survival for renal transplant recipients ≥60years

There has been an increase in the number of older patients on the transplant waiting list and acceptance of older donor kidneys. Although kidneys from older donors have been associated with poorer graft outcomes, whether there is a differential impact of donor age on outcomes in older recipients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of donor age on graft and patient survival in renal transplant (RT) recipients ≥60years. Using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, outcomes of 1,037 RT recipients ≥60years between 1995 and 2009 were analyzed. Donor age groups were categorized into 0-20, >20-40, >40-60, and >60years. Compared with recipients receiving donor kidneys >60years, those receiving donor kidneys >20-40years had lower risk of acute rejection (odds ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.27, 0.79; P<0.01) and death-censored graft failure (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19, 0.72; P<0.01). There was no association between donor age groups and death. With a corresponding growth in the availability of older donor kidneys and the observed lack of association between donor age and patient survival in RT recipients ≥60years, preferential allocation of older donor kidneys to RT recipients ≥60years may not disadvantage the life expectancy of these patients.     

Excess risk of renal allograft loss associated with cigarette smoking.

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking contributes to a number of health-related problems, but its impact on renal transplant survival beyond accelerated patient death is unclear. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of 645 adult renal allograft recipients from 1985 to 1995 to evaluate the relationship between smoking and graft outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-four percent of recipients (156/645) were smokers at the time of transplant evaluation. Of these, 90% continued to smoke after transplantation. Pretransplant smoking was significantly associated with reduced overall graft and death-censored graft survival. Patients who were smokers at the time of pretransplant evaluation had kidney graft survival of 84%, 65%, and 48% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively, compared with graft survival in nonsmokers of 88%, 78%, and 62% (P=0.007). Pretransplant smoking adversely affected death-censored graft survival in recipients of cadaveric (P=0.02) and of living donor kidneys (P=0.02). Reduced graft survival in pretransplant smokers could not be accounted for by differences in rejection (64% vs. 61%, P=0.35). In a multivariate analysis, pretransplant smoking was associated with a relative risk of 2.3 for graft loss. Among patients with a smoking history before transplantation, death-censored graft survival was significantly higher for those who quit smoking before transplant evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette smoking before kidney transplantation contributes significantly to allograft loss. The effect of smoking on graft outcome is not explained by increases in rejection or patient death. Smoking cessation before renal transplantation has beneficial effects on graft survival. These effects should be emphasized to patients with end-stage renal disease who are considering renal transplantation.     

Renal transplantation in recipients over the age of 60: the impact of donor age

BACKGROUND: Kidneys from older donors exhibit a series of changes characterized by glomerular, vascular, and tubular senescence. These changes may be aggravated by atherosclerosis, hypertension, or diabetes, which are highly prevalent in older individuals. METHODS: We analyzed the outcome after transplantation in 230 recipients over the age of 60, who received transplants between February 1990 and December 1996. We assessed the 1- and 5-year patient and graft survival, the quality of renal function, tacrolimus levels, the incidence of rejection, and the incidence of delayed graft function, and compared the outcomes in recipients of kidneys from donors over the age of 60 (group 1, n = 40) with those in recipients of kidneys from donors under the age of 60 (group 2, n = 190). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of recipient sex, race, age, and cold ischemia time. Immunosuppression was with tacrolimus and steroids in 61% of cases; in the remainder of the patients, a third agent, either azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (for 1 week), or mycophenolate mofetil was administered as well. The median follow-up was 31.5 months (range: 1-86). RESULTS: In recipients over the age of 60 receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, overall patient survival at 1 and 5 years was 90% and 76%, and was not significantly compromised in recipients receiving a kidney from a donor over the age of 60. The overall 1-and 5-year actuarial graft survival was 84% and 64%; in recipients from donors over the age of 60, it was 73% and 52%, whereas in recipients of kidneys from donors under the age of 60, it was 87% and 66% (P<0.05). Most of the effect on graft survival was seen by 1 year. The mean serum creatinine was 2.6+/-2.7 mg/dl, without any difference between the two groups. Although the incidence of delayed graft function was higher in recipients of kidneys from donors over the age of 60, this difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall outcomes of transplantation in older recipients remain reasonable, the inferior outcomes with older donor kidneys call into question proposals to utilize older donor kidneys preferentially in older recipients.     

Time-dependent risk factors influencing the long-term outcome in living renal allografts: donor age is a crucial risk factor for long-term graft survival more than 5 years after transplantation

BACKGROUND: Most investigations have revealed that the improvement in early graft survival has not resulted in a corresponding improvement in long-term graft survival. The risk factors for long-term graft survival should be clarified. METHODS: A single-center experience of 1100 consecutive renal transplant recipients who received kidneys from living donors from 1983 to 1998 was reviewed to clarify the time dependency of risk factors for long-term graft survival. We examined various possible risk factors, including HLA-AB and -DR mismatches, ABO-blood group incompatibility, graft weight, donor age and sex, recipient age and sex, and the presence or absence of acute rejection by using the time-dependent, nonproportional Cox's hazards model. RESULTS: Acute rejection episode, donor age, HLA-AB 4-antigen mismatches, ABO-incompatible transplantation, smaller kidney weight compared with the patient's body weight (Kw/Bw ratio less than 2.67), and transplantation from an unrelated living donor were risk factors for long-term graft outcome. Multivariate analysis for time-dependent risk factors showed that donor age of more than 60 years was the most important risk factor for long-term graft failure after 5 years posttransplantation (hazard ratio: 2.57). In contrast, acute rejection, ABO incompatibility, and nonrelated donors were significant risk factors for short-term graft failure within 5 years after kidney transplantation (hazard ratios: 2.68, 1.57, and 1.69, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Donor age of more than 60 years was a crucial risk factor affecting long-term graft survival. In contrast, acute rejection, ABO incompatibility, and nonrelated donors were significant risk factors for short-term graft failure.     

Cadaveric renal transplantation after 60 years of age

We report the outcome of 121 cadaveric renal transplants performed in our institution between September 1985 and April 1992 in 117 patients, aged 60–71 years (mean 63 years) at the time of transplantation. Compared to 640 patients 20–59 years of age transplanted during the same study period, a nonstatistically significant difference was observed in the 5-year actuarial patient (80% and 90%, respectively, in recipients over and under 60 years of age) and transplant (80% and 72%, respectively, in recipients over and under 60 years oaf age) survival rates. However, elderly patients had significantly lower survival than recipients 20–29 years of age (P<0.009). Fourteen patients died (all but one with a functioning graft) due to cardiovascular diseases (5%; 42.8% of total deaths), infections (3%; 28.6% of total deaths), and gastrointestinal complications (3%; 28.6% of total deaths). Younger patients showed a similar and nonsignificantly different incidence of cardiovascular- (35%) and infectious- (30%) related deaths. The incidence of acute rejection episodes and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infectious episodes was 27% and 24%, respectively, during the 1st post-transplant year. Ongoing acute rejection and CMV infectious episodes were significantly higher in patients who died than in those still alive (P<0.002 and P<0.02, respectively). Cyclosporin maintenance therapy was well tolerated in all patients but one, and 64% of the patients could be maintained without steroids. These data indicate that cadaveric renal transplantation is a safe and effective procedure in the management of chronic renal failure of selected patients 60 years of age or older.     

Living related kidney donors over 60 years old

The lack of available cadaveric organs for transplantation has resulted in an increased number of kidney transplants from living donors. During a period of 6 years, 149 kidney transplantations were performed from living related donors in our institute, 33.5% of whom were older than 60 years of age. In this study we examined the survival of patients and grafts as well as the graft function in 50 patients with transplants from donors over 60 years (mean age 65 years) as compared with those of 99 patients with transplants from donors younger than 60 years (mean age 47 years). There were no significant differences in the course of donor nephrectomy, postoperative complications, or remnant kidney function. However, delayed graft function occurred more frequently in recipients of transplants from older donors. Improvement in graft function was also slower in recipients of kidneys from older donors, with significant differences in serum creatinine levels observed during the first 12 months after transplantation. More frequent acute complications and more progressive chronic graft failure, irrespective of the causes, occurred during the 1st post-transplant year in recipients with grafts from older donors. Five-year patient survival (77% vs 92%) and kidney graft survival differed significantly for the same period with worse results for patients receiving grafts from older donors. It may be concluded that kidney grafts from donors older than 60 years — and especially those older than 70 years — may be used for living related kidney transplantation, but with precautions.     

Do elderly patients deserve a kidney graft?

PURPOSE: Compare renal transplant long-term outcomes among recipients aged 60 years or older with those in younger patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 103 transplants in recipients above 60 years of age for the influence of key factors related to the graft and patient. The results were compared with 1060 transplant recipients aged 18 to 59 years. RESULTS: The mean ages were 62.93 and 40.35 years for the older and younger group. The older group showed a higher prevalence of obesity and unknown etiologies for the end-stage renal disease. Important comorbidity was significantly more frequent among recipients aged more than 60 years, mainly of a cardiovascular nature (56% vs 18.5%). Donor age (39.75 vs 31.59 years), cold ischemia time (22.43 vs 20.49 hours) and human leukocyte antigen compatibilities (2.59 vs 2.36) were significantly greater in the older subset. After a mean follow-up of 4.72 and 6.07 years for the older versus younger group, we found no differences in initial graft function, acute rejection rate, and serum creatinine/clearance. Patient and graft survivals at 1, 5, and 10 years were lower among the 60+ group. There were no differences in graft survival censored for death with a functioning graft, namely, 95.1%, 89.4%, and 81.2% for the 60+ cohort. The main cause of graft loss in the older group was death with a functioning graft. CONCLUSION: Renal transplantation should be considered for selected patients older than 60 years. Despite a shorter life expectancy, they benefit from it similar to younger recipients.     

Kidneys from Deceased Donors: Maximizing the Value of a Scarce Resource

Donor age is a significant risk factor for graft loss after kidney transplantation. We investigated the question whether significant graft years were being lost through transplantation of younger donor kidneys into older recipients with potentially shorter lifespans than the organs they receive. We examined patient and graft survival for deceased donor kidney transplants performed in the United States between the years 1990 and 2002 by Kaplan-Meier plots. We categorized the distribution of deceased donor kidneys by donor and recipient age. Subsequently, we calculated the actual and projected graft survival of transplanted kidneys from younger donors with the patient survival of transplant recipients of varying ages. Over the study period, 16.4% (9250) transplants from donors aged 15-50 were transplanted to recipients over the age of 60. At the same time, 73.6% of donors above the age of 50 were allocated to recipients under the age of 60. The graft survival of grafts from younger donors significantly exceeded the patient survival of recipients over the age of 60. The overall projected improvement in graft survival, by excluding transplantation of younger kidneys to older recipients, was approximately 3 years per transplant. Avoiding the allocation of young donor kidneys to elderly recipients, could have significantly increased the overall graft life, by a total 27,500 graft years, between 1990 and 2002, with projected cost savings of about 1.5 billion dollars.