Boceprevir is highly effective in treatment-experienced hepatitis C virus-positive genotype-1 menopausal women

AIM: To investigate the safety/efficacy of Boceprevirbased triple therapy in hepatitis C virus(HCV)-G1 menopausal women who were historic relapsers, partial-responders and null-responders. METHODS: In this single-assignment, unblinded study, we treated fifty-six menopausal women with HCV-G1, 46% F3-F4, and previous PEG-α/RBV failure(7% null, 41% non-responder, and 52% relapser) with 4 wk lead-in with PEG-IFNα2b/RBV followed by PEGIFNα2b/RBV+Boceprevir for 32 wk, with an additional 12 wk of PEG-IFN-α-2b/RBV if patients were HCV-RNApositive by week 8. In previous null-responders, 44 wk of triple therapy was used. The primary objective of retreatment was to verify whether a sustained virological response(SVR)(HCV RNA undetectable at 24 wk of follow-up) rate of at least 20% could be obtained. The secondary objective was the evaluation of the percent of patients with negative HCV RNA at week 4(RVR), 8(RVR BOC), 12(EVR), or at the end-of-treatment(ETR) that reached SVR. To assess the relationship between SVR and clinical and biochemical parameters, multiple logistic regression analysis was used.RESULTS: After lead-in, only two patients had RVR; HCV-RNA was unchanged in all but 62% who had ≤1 log10 decrease. After Boceprevir, HCV RNA became undetectable at week 8 in 32/56(57.1%) and at week 12 in 41/56(73.2%). Of these, 53.8% and 52.0%, respectively, achieved SVR. Overall, SVR was obtained in 25/56(44.6%). SVR was achieved in 55% previous relapsers vs. 41% non-responders(P = 0.250), in 44% F0-F2 vs 54% F3-F4(P = 0.488), and in 11/19(57.9%) of patients with cirrhosis. At univariate analysis for baseline predictors of SVR, only previous response to antiviral therapy(OR = 2.662, 95%CI: 0.957-6.881, P = 0.043), was related with SVR. When considering “on treatment” factors, 1 log10 HCV RNA decline at week 4(3.733, 95%CI: 1.676-12.658, P = 0.034) and achievement of RVR BOC(7.347, 95%CI: 2.156-25.035, P = 0.001) were significantly related with the SVR, although RVR BOC only(6.794, 95%CI: 1.596-21.644, P = 0.010) maintained significance at multivariate logistic regression analysis. Anemia and neutropenia were managed with Erythropoietin and Filgrastim supplementation, respectively. Only six patients discontinued therapy. CONCLUSION: Boceprevir obtained high SVR response independent of previous response, RVR or baseline fibrosis or cirrhosis. RVR BOC was the only independent predictor of SVR.     

Effectiveness and safety of first-generation protease inhibitors in clinical practice: Hepatitis C virus patients with advanced fibrosis

AIM:To evaluates the effectiveness and safety of the first generation,NS3/4A protease inhibitors(PIs) in clinical practice against chronic C virus,especially in patients with advanced fibrosis. METHODS:Prospective study and non-experimental analysis of a multicentre cohort of 38 Spanish hospitals that includes patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1,treatment-na?ve(TN) or treatment-experienced(TE),who underwent triple therapy with the first generation NS3/4A protease inhibitors,boceprevir(BOC) and telaprevir(TVR),in combination with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. The patients were treatment in routine practice settings. Data on the study population and on adverse clinical and virologic effects were compiled during the treatment period and during follow up.RESULTS:One thousand and fifty seven patients were included,405(38%) were treated with BOC and 652(62%) with TVR. Of this total,30%(n = 319) were TN and the remaining were TE:28%(n = 298) relapsers,12%(n = 123) partial responders(PR),25%(n = 260) null-responders(NR) and for 5%(n = 57) with prior response unknown. The rate of sustained virologic response(SVR) by intention-to-treatment(ITT) was greater in those treated with TVR(65%) than in those treated with BOC(52%)(P 0.0001),whereas by modified intention-to-treatment(m ITT) no were found significant differences. By degree of fibrosis,56% of patients were F4 and the highest SVR rates were recorded in the non-F4 patients,both TN and TE. In the analysis by groups,the TN patients treated with TVR by ITT showed a higher SVR(P = 0.005). However,by m ITT there were no significant differences between BOC and TVR. In the multivariate analysis by m ITT,the significant SVR factors were relapsers,IL28 B CC and non-F4; the type of treatment(BOC or TVR) was not significant. The lowest SVR values were presented by the F4-NR patients,treated with BOC(46%) or with TVR(45%). 28% of the patients interrupted the treatment,mainly by non-viral response(51%):this outcome was more frequent in the TE than in the TN patients(57% vs 40%,P = 0.01). With respect to severe haematological disorders,neutropaenia was more likely to affect the patients treated with BOC(33% vs 20%,P ≤ 0.0001),and thrombocytopaenia and anaemia,the F4 patients(P = 0.000,P = 0.025,respectively). CONCLUSION:In a real clinical practice setting with a high proportion of patients with advanced fibrosis,effectiveness of first-generation PIs was high except for NR patients,with similar SVR rates being achieved by BOC and TVR.     

Peginterferon plus ribavirin and sustained virological response rate in HCV-related advanced fibrosis: a real life study

BackgroundTolerance and response to antiviral HCV treatment is poor in advanced fibrosis. The aim of this study was to assess SVR rate and its predictive factors in HCV advanced fibrosis patients treated in real life with full dose PEG-IFN plus RBV and to evaluate the adverse events related to treatment.MethodsA multicentric, retrospective study was conducted at six university hospitals. METAVIR F3 and F4 HCV monoinfected patients who were treated with PEG-IFN and RBV had their data analyzed. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the variables independently related to SVR. Adverse events were recorded during treatment.Results308 patients were included, 75% genotype 1 and 23% genotype 3. METAVIR F3 was present in 39% and F4 in 61% of patients. The median Child Pugh score for F4 patients was 5 (5–9). The global SVR rate was 34%, 11% were relapsers and 55% were nonresponders. SVR rates were similar between patients treated with PEG-IFN alfa 2a or alfa 2b (p = 0.24). SVR rates according to Child–Pugh score were 26% (Child A) and 18% (Child B). The independent factors related to SVR in F4 patients were genotype 3, RVR and fewer Child Pugh score points. Treatment interruption occurred in 31% patients and death occurred in 1.9%, all with liver cirrhosis.ConclusionTreatment of HCV in patients with advanced fibrosis should not be postponed. However, a very careful evaluation of cirrhotic patients must be performed before treatment is indicated and careful monitoring is required during treatment.     

Changes in liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV‐coinfected patients following different outcomes with peginterferon plus ribavirin therapy

There is scarce information about the impact of antiviral treatment on subsequent progression of liver fibrosis in HIV‐infected patients with chronic hepatitis C who experience different outcomes following peginterferon‐ribavirin therapy. We conducted a retrospective study of a cohort of HIV/HCV‐coinfected patients with longitudinal assessment of liver fibrosis using elastometry. Patients were split out into four groups according to the prior peginterferon‐ribavirin response: sustained virological response (SVR), relapse (R), partial response (PR) and null response (NR). A group of untreated, coinfected patients was taken as control. Significant liver fibrosis progression (sLFP) was defined as a shift from baseline Metavir estimates ≤F2 to F3‐F4, or by >30% increase in liver stiffness in patients with baseline F3‐F4. Conversely, significant liver fibrosis regression (sLFR) was defined as a shift from baseline Metavir estimates F3‐F4 to ≤F2, or by >30% reduction in liver stiffness in patients that kept on F3‐F4. A total of 498 HIV/HCV‐coinfected patients were examined. They were classified as follows: 138 (27.7%) SVR, 40 (8%) R, 61 (12.2%) PR, 71 (14.3%) NR and 188 (37.8%) naive. After a mean follow‐up of 53.3 months, sLFP occurred less frequently in patients with SVR (7.2%) compared with R (25%; P = 0.002), PR (23%; P = 0.002), NR (29.6%; P < 0.001) and naïve (19.7%; P = 0.002). Conversely, sLFR was 26.1% in SVR compared with 10% in R (P = 0.03), 14.8% in PR (P = 0.06), 16.9% in NR (P = 0.07) and 10.6% in naïve (P < 0.001). Sustained clearance of serum HCV‐RNA following a course of antiviral treatment is the major determinant of liver fibrosis regression in HIV/HCV‐coinfected patients.     

Undetectable HCV‐RNA at treatment‐week 8 results in high‐sustained virological response in HCV G1 treatment‐experienced patients with advanced liver disease: the International Italian/Spanish Boceprevir/Peginterferon/Ribavirin Name Patients Program

In many countries, first‐generation protease inhibitors (PIs)/peginterferon/ribavirin (P/R) still represent the only treatment option for HCV‐infected patients. Subjects with advanced disease and previous failure to P/R urgently need therapy, but they are under‐represented in clinical trials. All treatment‐experienced F3/4 Metavir patients who received boceprevir (BOC)+P/R in the Italian–Spanish Name Patient Program have been included in this study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (MLR) was used to identify baseline and on‐treatment predictors of SVR and adverse events (AEs). Four hundred and sixteen patients, mean age 57.7 (range 25–78 years), 70% males, 69.5% (289/416) F4, 14% (41/289) Child–Pugh class A6, 24% (70/289) with varices and 42% (173/416) prior null responders to P/R, were analysed. Overall, SVR rate (all 381 patients who received one dose of BOC) was 49%, (58% in F3, 45% in F4, 61% in relapsers, 51% in partial, 38% in null responders, and 72% in subjects with undetectable HCV‐RNA at treatment‐week (TW)8. Among patients with TW8 HCV‐RNA ≥ 1000 IU/L, SVR was 8% (negative predictive value = 92%). Death occurred in 3 (0.8%) patients, while decompensation and infections were observed in 2.9% and 11%, respectively. At MLR, SVR predictors were TW4 HCV‐RNA ≥ 1log₁₀‐decline from baseline, undetectable TW8 HCV‐RNA, prior relapse, albumin levels ≥3.5 g/dL and platelet counts ≥100 000/μL. Metavir F4, Child‐Pugh A6, albumin, platelets, age and female gender were associated with serious and haematological AEs. Among treatment‐experienced patients with advanced liver disease eligible for IFN‐based therapy, TW8 HCV‐RNA characterised the subset with either high or poor likelihood of achieving SVR. Using TW8 HCV‐RNA as a futility rule, BOC/P/R appears to have a favourable benefit–risk profile.     

Retreatment with pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C who have relapsed or not responded to a first course of pegylated interferon-based therapy

BACKGROUND

Pegylated interferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin combination therapy remains the first-line treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. In contrast to the wealth of studies in treatment-naive patients, the effectiveness of retreatment in patients who have previously failed pegIFN-based therapy is largely unreported.

AIM:

To assess the effectiveness of the retreatment of patients who have previously failed an initial course of pegIFN-based therapy with pegIFNα-2a and ribavirin.

METHODS:

A post-hoc analysis of a multicentre open-label study was performed. Patients received pegIFNα-2a and ribavirin at a dose of 800 mg/day and later 1000 mg/day to 1200 mg/day for 24 to 48 weeks at the discretion of the investigator. Outcomes at week 12 (early virological response [EVR]) and week 24 (sustained virological response [SVR]) were analyzed.

RESULTS:

Eighty-seven patients who had relapsed after previous pegIFN-based therapy (n=28; 78% genotype 1) or were nonresponders (n=59; 71% genotype 1) were analyzed. Of the relapsers, 86% achieved an EVR and 68% achieved an SVR. In relapsers to pegIFN monotherapy (n=15) or pegIFN plus ribavirin (n=13), 60% and 77% achieved an SVR, respectively. Fibrosis and genotype did not affect the likelihood of SVR in relapsers although this may be the result of the relatively small number of patients. In previous nonresponders, an EVR was achieved in 53% but an SVR occurred in only 17%. In nonresponders to pegIFN monotherapy (n=9) and pegIFN plus ribavirin (n=50), 33% and 14% achieved an SVR, respectively. Genotype did not affect SVR in nonresponders. Only 10% with a METAVIR score of F3 or F4 on liver biopsy achieved an SVR.

CONCLUSIONS:

Relapse after previous pegIFN-based therapy is associated with a strong probability of treatment success whereas retreatment of those with previous nonresponse does not.     

Alanine aminotransferase normalization at week 8 predicts viral response during hepatitis C treatment

AIM:To investigate alanine aminotransferase(ALT)and sustained virological response(SVR)in chronic hepatitis C(CHC)during peginterferon-ribavirin treatment.METHODS:One hundred and fifty-one genotype 1CHC patients underwent treatment for 48 wk with peginterferon and ribavirin,and were retrospectively divided into two groups as having a rapid virological response(RVR)(Group 1,n=52)and not having an RVR(Group 2,n=99).We also subdivided each group into two according to the initial ALT level being high(Group1h and Group 2h)or normal(Group 1n and Group 2n).HCV RNA and ALT levels were measured at baseline;at 4,12,24 and 48 wk during the treatment period;and at 24 wk follow-up.ALT levels were also obtained at 8 wk.According to the results of ALT,patients were enrolled in either the follow-up abnormal or follow-up normalized ALT groups at each interval.Patients with high and normal ALT levels were compared for each interval in terms of SVR.RESULTS:The SVR rates were 83%vs 40%(P=0.000),82%vs 84%(P=0.830),and 37%vs 44%(P=0.466)when comparing Group 1 with 2,1h with1n,and 2h with 2n,respectively.In Group 2h,the SVR rates were 34%vs 40%(P=0.701),11%vs 52%(P=0.004),12%vs 50%(P=0.007),7%vs 50%(P=0.003),6%vs 53%(P=0.001),and 0%vs 64%(P=0.000)when comparing patients with high and normalized ALT levels at week 4,8,12,24,48 and 72,respectively.The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that RVR(OR=7.05;95%CI:3.1-16.05,P=0.000),complete early virological response(cEVR)(OR=17.55;95%CI:6.32-48.76,P=0.000),normalization of ALT at8 wk(OR=3.04;95%CI:1.31-7.06,P=0.008),and at 12 wk(OR=4.21;95%CI:1.65-10.76,P=0.002)were identified as independent significant predictive factors for SVR.CONCLUSION:Normalization of ALT at 8 wk may predict viral response during peginterferon-ribavirin treatment in genotype-1 CHC patients especially without RVR.     

Long-term leukocyte natural α-interferon and ribavirin treatment in hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation

AIM:To evaluate the effect of long-term treatment with leukocyte natural-interferon(ln-α-IFN)plus ribavirin(RBV).METHODS:Forty-six patients with hepatitis C virus(HCV)recurrence received 3 MU three times a week of ln-α-IFN plus RBV for 1 mo;then,patients with good tolerability(n=30)were switched to daily IFN administration,while the remaining were treated with the same schedule.Patients have been treated for 12 mo after viral clearance while non-responders(NR)entered in the longterm treatment group.Liver biopsies were planned at baseline,1 year after sustained virological response(SVR)and at 36 mo after start of therapy in NR.MedCalc software package was used for statistical analysis.RESULTS:About 16.7%of genotype 1-4 and 70%of genotype 2-3 patients achieved SVR.Nine patients withdrew therapy because of non-tolerance or noncompliance.A significant improvement in serum biochemistry and histological activity was observed in all SVR patients and long-term treated;100%of patients with SVR achieved a histological response(fibrosis stabilization or improvement)with a significant reduction in mean staging value(from 2.1 to 1.0;P=0.0031);histological response was observed in 84%of long-term treated patients compared to 57%of drop-out.Six patients died during the entire study period(follow-up 40.6±7.7 mo);of them,5 presented with severe HCV recurrence on enrollment.Diabetes(OR=0.38,95%CI:0.08-0.59,P=0.01),leukopenia(OR=0.54,95%CI:0.03-0.57,P=0.03)and severe HCV recurrence(OR=0.51,95%CI:0.25-0.69,P=0.0003)were variables associated to survival.Long-term treatment was well tolerated;no patients developed rejection or autoimmune disease.CONCLUSION:Long-term treatment improves histology in SVR patients and slows disease progression also in NR,leading to a reduction in liver decompensation,graft failure and liver-related death.     

Interferon-λ3 polymorphisms in pegylated-interferon-α plus ribavirin therapy for genotype-2 chronic hepatitis C

AIM: To evaluate interferon-λ3(IFNL3) polymorphisms in response-guided pegylated interferon-α plus ribavirin(Peg-IFNα/RBV) therapy for genotype 2(G2) chronic hepatitis C.METHODS: Between January 2006 and June 2012, a total of 180 patients with chronic infections of G2 hepatitis C virus(HCV) were treated with responseguided Peg-IFNα/RBV therapy. The treatment duration was 24 wk for patients who achieved rapid virologic response(RVR), and 36 or 48 wk for patients who did not. Then, the impact of the IFNL3 single nucleotide polymorphism genotype(TT/non-TT at rs8099917) on treatment outcomes was evaluated in the 180 patients, and between patients infected with either HCV subgenotype 2a or 2b.RESULTS: Of the 180 patients evaluated, 111 achieved RVR, while the remaining 69 patients did not. In RVR patients, the sustained virologic response(SVR) rate was 96.4%, and the IFNL3 genotype did not influence the SVR rate(96.6% vs 95.8% in IFNL3 genotype TT vs non-TT). However, in non-RVR patients, the SVR rate decreased to 72.5%(P 0.0001), and this rate was significantly different between the IFNL3 genotype TT and non-TT groups(80.0% vs 42.9%, P = 0.0146). Multivariate regression analysis in non-RVR patients identified the IFNL3 genotype TT as the only baseline-significant factor associated with SVR(OR = 5.39, 95%CI: 1.29-22.62; P = 0.0189). In analysis according to HCV sub-genotype, no significant difference in the SVR rate was found between HCV sub-genotypes 2a and 2b.CONCLUSION: In response-guided Peg-IFNα/RBV combination therapy for chronically HCV G2-infected patients, the impact of the IFNL3 genotype on SVR was limited to non-RVR patients.     

Management of telaprevir-based triple therapy for hepatitis C virus recurrence post liver transplant

AIM: To characterize management of telaprevir (TVR)-based triple therapy of hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection after liver transplantation (LT).METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed safety and efficacy of telaprevir - based triple therapy in a single center cohort of 19 patients with HCV genotype (GT) 1 recurrence after LT, with respect to factors possibly predicting sustained viral response (SVR) or non-SVR. All patients were treated with TVR, pegylated (PEG) and ribavirine (RBV) for 12 wk followed by a dual phase with PEG/RBV for 12 wk in 7 patients and for 36 wk in 5 patients.RESULTS: In total 11/19 (58%) of patients achieved a sustained response. All (11/11) SVR patients showed a rapid viral response at treatment weeks 4 and 11/14 rapid virological response (RVR) patients achieved SVR. Notably, all (7/7) patients who completed 48 wk of therapy and 80% (4/5) patients who completed 24 wk of therapy achieved SVR24. Treatment failure was significantly (P > 0.049) more frequent in GT1a infection (5/7) compared to GT1b (3/12) infection and was associated with emergence of resistance-associated mutations in the NS3 protease domain. Bilirubin level at baseline is also related to SVR (P > 0.030). None of the patients had to discontinue treatment due to side effects.CONCLUSION: RVR, GT and bilirubin are clearly related to achievement of SVR. Providing a thorough patient selection and monitoring, a full course of TVR-based triple therapy in LT patients is feasible and achieves high SVR rates.     

Reduction of liver stiffness by interferon treatment in the patients with chronic hepatitis C

Aim: To assess the regression of liver fibrosis after interferon (IFN) treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C, liver stiffness (LS) was measured repeatedly and the factors associated with reduction of LS were assessed. Methods: LS was measured by transient elastography before treatment, at end of treatment (EOT), and 1 year and 2 years after EOT in 145 patients with chronic hepatitis C treated by IFN with or without ribavirin. Results: In the patients with sustained virological response (SVR) (n = 93) and relapsers (n = 28), LS significantly decreased at EOT (median, 5.4 [interquartile range, 4.0–8.6] kilopascals [kPa], P < 0.0001 and 6.8 [4.5–8.9] kPa, P = 0.0023) and 1 year after EOT (5.3 [4.2–7.0] kPa, P < 0.0001 and 6.8 [4.5–9.3] kPa, P = 0.0204) compared with baseline (8.0 [5.0–11.9] kPa and 10.6 [7.0–16.6] kPa). In SVR patients, LS significantly decreased 2 years after EOT (5.3 [4.1–6.3] kPa) compared with baseline (P < 0.0001) and LS at EOT (P = 0.0034). Two points or greater reduction of deduced stage at last LS measurement was observed in 78% of SVR patients, 59% of relapsers and 15% of patients with non‐virological response whose pretreatment deduced stages were F3–F4. Fibrosis stage, hyaluronic acid levels, duration of treatment, response to treatment and alanine aminotransferase levels were associated with a 2‐point or greater decrease of deduced fibrosis stage. Conclusion: IFN treatment reduced LS in SVR patients and relapsers. Significant reduction of LS is associated with milder fibrosis stage, lower hyaluronic acid levels, longer IFN treatment, virological response of SVR or relapse and higher alanine aminotransferase levels.     

The rate of fibrosis progression is an independent predictor of the response to antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C

summary . The response to antiviral therapy and the rate of fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are related to common factors, including age and gender. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the rate of fibrosis progression and the sustained virologic response (SVR) to interferon (IFN)-based treatment. A total of 332 patients treated for chronic HCV infection were evaluated. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, the impact of the rate of fibrosis progression (defined as the stage of liver fibrosis according to the Metavir system/duration of infection) on the rate of SVR (negative HCV RNA at least 6 months following the end of treatment), was determined. The median age of the patients was 44 (range 25–77) years, 64% were male, and 66% were infected with genotypes 1, 4, 5 or 6. The median rate of fibrosis progression was 0.083 (range 0–2) Metavir units/year; 158 patients (48%) had F2–F4 fibrosis. After a median of 48 (range 2–126) weeks of therapy (IFN, n =190; IFN and ribavirin, n =96; pegylated IFN, n =20; pegylated IFN and ribavirin, n =26), 93 patients (28%) achieved an SVR. In univariate analysis, the rate of SVR was higher in slow [< 0.083 Metavir units/year ( n =162)] than rapid progressors [≥ 0.083 Metavir units/year ( n =170)] (35% vs 22%, P =0.01). After controlling for age, gender, genotype, viral load, and treatment regimen and duration, the rate of fibrosis progression remained an independent predictor of SVR (slow vs rapid progressors, OR 2.74; 95% CI 1.27–5.92; P =0.01). Hence the rate of fibrosis progression is an independent predictor of SVR to IFN-based therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. This additional factor should be considered in economic models evaluating this condition.     

Factors affecting efficacy in patients with genotype 2 chronic hepatitis C treated by pegylated interferon alpha‐2b and ribavirin: reducing drug doses has no impact on rapid and sustained virological responses

Summary. Reducing the dose of drug affects treatment efficacy in pegylated interferon (Peg‐IFN) and ribavirin combination therapy for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of drug exposure, as well as the baseline factors and the virological response on the treatment efficacy for genotype 2 patients. Two‐hundred and fifty patients with genotype 2 HCV who were to undergo combination therapy for 24 weeks were included in the study, and 213 completed the treatment. Significantly more patients who achieved a rapid virological response (RVR), defined as HCV RNA negativity at week 4, achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) (92%, 122/133) compared with patients who failed to achieve RVR (48%, 38/80) (P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic‐regression analysis showed that only platelet counts [odds ratio (OR), 1.68; confidence interval (CI), 1.002–1.139] and RVR (OR, 11.251; CI, 5.184–24.419) were independently associated with SVR, with no correlation being found for the mean dose of Peg‐IFN and ribavirin for RVR and SVR. Furthermore, in the stratification analysis of the timing of viral clearance, neither mean dose of Peg‐IFN (P = 0.795) nor ribavirin (P = 0.649) affected SVR in each group. Among the patients with RVR, the lowest dose group of Peg‐IFN (0.77 ± 0.10 μg/kg/week) and ribavirin (6.9 ± 0.90 mg/kg/day) showed 100% and 94% of SVR. Hence, RVR served as an important treatment predictor, and drug exposure had no impact on both SVR and RVR in combination therapy for genotype 2 patients.     

Pegylated interferon plus optimized weight‐based ribavirin dosing negate the influence of weight and body mass index on early viral kinetics and sustained virological response in chronic hepatitis C

Summary. Aim: Elevated body mass index (BMI) in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) has been associated with reduced rates of sustained virological response (SVR). The aims of this study were to determine whether early viral kinetics (and subsequently SVR) are influenced by weight or BMI by measuring HCV RNA at week 4 using two PCR assays with differing sensitivities. Methods: Patients with CHC treated with peginterferon plus weight‐based ribavirin were included in this retrospective study. Body mass index, pretreatment viral load, genotype and liver histology were abstracted from the clinical database. HCV RNA PCR (lower limit of detection (LLD) <50 IU/mL) at treatment week 4 and 6 months after completion of therapy were recorded to determine the presence of rapid virological response (RVR‐50) and SVR, respectively. In those who achieved RVR‐50, stored week 4 serum was retested using Taqman (LLD < 15 IU/mL, RVR‐15). Results: Of 134 patients included (genotype 1 57%, BMI 26.7 ± 4.5 kg/m², ribavirin dose 13.9 ± 2.6 mg/kg/day), 59% achieved SVR. RVR‐50 was observed in 39.6% and RVR‐15 in 27.6%. Neither body weight nor BMI influenced RVR‐50, RVR‐15 or SVR. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of RVR‐50 and RVR‐15 for SVR were 88.7% and 97.3% (P = 0.23). RVR‐50 and RVR‐15 superceded genotype and viral load as the strongest independent predictors of SVR (OR 9.25 (1.9–45.11) and OR 30.74 (3.08–317.96), respectively). Conclusions: RVR is the strongest predictor of SVR. Early viral kinetics is not influenced by body weight or BMI when weight‐based ribavirin is prescribed.     

Rapid Virological Response Represents the Highest Prediction Factor of Response to Antiviral Treatment in HCV-Related Chronic Hepatitis: a Multicenter Retrospective Study

Background:

Standard [i.e. pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) + ribavirin] treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related chronic hepatitis is associated with a sustained virological response (SVR) in 50 - 90% of patients. A rapid virological response (RVR) (i.e. negative HCV-RNA after 4 weeks of treatment) predicts SVR in almost 90% of patients.

Objectives:

The main aim of this study was to assess the strength of RVR, as a predictive factor of antiviral treatment response.

Patients and Methods:

Using univariate and multivariate analysis, we retrospectively evaluated biochemical, metabolic, genetic and viral variables that might affect both RVR and SVR to Peg-IFN plus ribavirin, in 315 consecutive outpatients affected by HCV-related chronic hepatitis.

Results:

At univariate analysis, staging, body mass index, RVR, genotype and viral load were significantly related to SVR (P < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, RVR and genotype remained significant (P < 0.00001). The RVR had a predictive value of 83%. At univariate and multivariate analyses, diabetes (P = 0.003), genotype 2 (P = 0.000) and HCV-RNA values (P = 0.016) were independent predictors of RVR, even though at multivariate analyses, only genotype 2 was significantly related to RVR. When we stratified patients, according to genotype, no laboratory or clinical factors were predictive of RVR in genotype 1 patients at either univariate or multivariate analysis. In genotype 2 patients, staging (P = 0.029) and diabetes (P = 0.001) were the only significant predictors of RVR at univariate analyses, whereas no factor was independently related to RVR, at multivariate analysis.

Conclusions:

The RVR is the strongest factor of SVR and infection with HCV genotype 2 is significantly associated with RVR. Neither biochemical and/or metabolic factors seem to exert influence on RVR.     

New antiviral therapies for chronic hepatitis C

Chronic hepatitis C is an important health issue worldwide. The current standard therapy is based on a combination of pegylated-interferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV), but this treatment leads to only ~50% sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with HCV genotype 1 and high viral loads, who were mostly null-responders or relapsers. Among HCV genotypes other than HCV genotype 1, especially HCV genotype 4 patients show only 40–70% SVR by this treatment. Although new drugs also depend on the combination of pegIFN and RBV, it appears that these drugs improve not only rapid virological response (RVR) but also early virological response, leading to SVR in these patients. In the near future, we predict higher SVR rates in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with these new drugs.     

Protease inhibitor-based triple therapy is highly effective for hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplant: a multicenter experience

Introduction. Hepatitis C (HCV) continues to be the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT). Sustained virological response (SVR) rates to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy for recurrent HCV in Genotype 1 (G1) LT recipients have been disappointing (30-40%). Experience with triple therapy using protease inhibitors (PI) boceprevir (BOC), telaprevir (TVR) in these patients has been limited.Material and methods. This national multicenter retrospective study included 76 patients (64 male, mean age 57 ± 6 years), treated for G1 HCV recurrence with either BOC (n = 41) or TVR (n = 35), who were non-responders or relapsers (n = 54), treatment naïve (n = 22) or had fibrosing cholestatic HCV (n = 3). 53 patients were on cyclosporine, 22 on tacrolimus and one patient on prednisone alone.Results. On treatment virologic response was observed in 84% (64/76), 83% in BOC and 85% in TVR group. A higher week 4 response after starting triple therapy (RVR) was noted in TVR group 25/35 (81%) as compared to BOC group 26/41 (63%); p value = 0.02. The end of treatment response was 78% and 75% in BOC and TVR group, respectively. SVR 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation was observed in 59.5% (22/37); 58.3% in the BOC group and 61.5% in TVR group. Treatment was discontinued early in 23 patients (serious adverse effects n = 19, treatment failure n = 4). Infections occurred in 5 patients with 2 deaths (all in BOC). Anemia was the most common side effect (n = 55, 72%) requiring erythropoietin and RBV dose reduction. In the BOC group, cyclosporine dose reduction was 2.2 ± 1.0 fold and 8.6 ± 2.4 fold with tacrolimus. In TVR group, dose reduction was 3.0 ± 1.4 with cyclosporine and 12 ± 5.7 fold with tacrolimus. Conclusions. PI-based triple therapy appears more effective in producing HCV-RNA clearance than dual therapy. Tolerability is a serious issue and drug-drug interactions are manageable with close monitoring.     

Virologic response and haematologic toxicity of boceprevir‐ and telaprevir‐containing regimens in actual clinical settings

Effectiveness, safety and tolerability of boceprevir (BOC) and telaprevir (TPV) in actual clinical settings remain unknown. We determined rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) and haematologic adverse effects among persons treated with BOC‐ or TPV‐containing regimens, compared with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PEG/RBV). Using an established cohort of hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐infected persons, Electronically Retrieved Cohort of HCV Infected Veterans (ERCHIVES), we identified those treated with a BOC‐ or TPV‐containing regimen and HCV genotype 1‐infected controls treated with PEG/RBV. We excluded those with HIV coinfection and missing HCV RNA values to determine SVR. Primary endpoints were SVR (undetectable HCV RNA ≥12 weeks after treatment completion) and haematologic toxicity (grade 3/4 anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia). We evaluated 2288 persons on BOC‐, 409 on TPV‐containing regimen and 6308 on PEG/RBV. Among these groups, respectively, 31%, 43% and 9% were treatment‐experienced; 17%, 37% and 14% had baseline cirrhosis; 63%, 54% and 48% were genotype 1a. SVR rates among noncirrhotics were as follows: treatment naïve: 65% (BOC), 67% (TPV) and 31% (PEG/RBV); treatment experienced: 57% (BOC), 54% (TPV) and 13% (PEG/RBV); (P‐value not significant for BOC vs TPV; P < 0.0001 for BOC or TPV vs PEG/RBV). Haematologic toxicities among BOC‐, TPV‐ and PEG/RBV‐treated groups were as follows: grade 3/4 anaemia 7%, 11% and 3%; grade 4 thrombocytopenia 2.2%, 5.4% and 1.7%; grade 4 neutropenia 8.2%, 5.6% and 3.4%. SVR rates are higher and closer to those reported in pivotal clinical trials among BOC‐ and TPV‐treated persons compared with PEG/RBV‐treated persons. Haematologic adverse events are frequent, but severe toxicity is uncommon.     

Personalized Therapy of Chronic Hepatitis C and B Dually Infected Patients With Pegylated Interferon Plus Ribavirin: A Randomized Study

We aimed to investigate whether response-guided therapy (RGT) with peginterferon-alpha plus ribavirin by using hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype, pretreatment HCV RNA levels, and rapid virological response (RVR, undetectable HCV RNA at treatment week 4) could be applied for active HCV/hepatitis B virus (HBV) dually infected patients, without compromised the treatment efficacy.A total of 203 patients, seropositive of HCV antibody, HCV RNA and HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), and seronegative for HBV e antigen for >6 months, were randomized to receive peginterferon-alpha/ribavirin by either genotype-guided therapy (GGT, n = 102: HCV genotype 1 [HCV-1], 48 weeks; HCV-2/3, 24 weeks) or RGT (n = 101: HCV-1, 48 or 24 weeks if patients with baseline VL <400,000 IU/mL and RVR; HCV-2/3, 24 or 16 weeks if patients with RVR). The primary endpoint was HCV-sustained virological response (SVR).The HCV SVR rate was comparable between the GGT (77.5%, 79/102) and RGT groups (70.3%, 71/101, P = 0.267), either among HCV-1/HBV (69.4% [43/62] vs 63.5% [40/63], P = 0.571) or among HCV-2/3/HBV (90.0% [36/40] vs 81.6% [31/38], P = 0.342) dually infected patients based on intention-to-treat analysis. In HCV-1/HBV dually infected patients, RVR (odds ratio [OR]: 6.05; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 2.148–17.025, P = 0.001) and lower pretreatment blood glucose levels (OR: 0.97; CI: 0.944–0.989, P = 0.003) were independent predictors of HCV SVR. Although RVR (OR: 10.68; CI: 1.948–58.514, P = 0.006) was the only significant factor associated with HCV SVR in HCV-2/3/HBV dually infected patients. HBsAg loss at 1 year posttreatment was observed in 17 of 185 (9.2%) patients. The rates of discontinuation and adverse events were similar between the 2 groups.RGT with peginterferon-alpha/RBV may be considered for HBeAg-negative HBV/HCV dually infected patients.     

Increased Duration of Dual Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin Therapy for Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Post-liver Transplantation Increases Sustained Virologic Response: A Retrospective Review

Background/Aim:

In patients with advanced post-transplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence, antiviral treatment (AVT) with interferon and ribavirin is indicated to prevent graft failure. The aim of this study was to determine and report Canadian data with respect to the safety, efficacy, and spontaneous virologic response (SVR) predictors of AVT among transplanted patients with HCV recurrence.

Patients and Methods:

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients transplanted in London, Ontario and Edmonton, Alberta from 2002 to 2012 who were treated for HCV. Demographic, medical, and treatment information was collected and analyzed.

Results:

A total of 85 patients with HCV received pegylated interferon with ribavirin post-liver transplantation and 28 of the 65 patients (43%) with genotype 1 achieved SVR. Of the patients having genotype 1 HCV who achieved SVR, there was a significantly lower stage of fibrosis (1.37 ± 0.88 vs. 1.89 ± 0.96; P = 0.03), increased ribavirin dose (total daily dose 1057 ± 230 vs. 856 ± 399 mg; P = 0.02), increased rapid virologic response (RVR) (6/27 vs. 0/31; P = 0.05), increased early virologic response (EVR) (28/28 vs. 18/35; P = 0.006), and longer duration of therapy (54.7 ± 13.4 weeks vs. 40.2 ± 18.7; P = 0.001). A logistic regression model using gender, age, RVR, EVR, anemia, duration of therapy, viral load, years’ post-transplant, and type of organ (donation after cardiac death vs. donation after brain death) significantly predicted SVR (P < 0.001), with duration of therapy having a significant odds ratio of 1.078 (P = 0.007).

Conclusions:

This study identified factors that predict SVR in HCV-positive patients who received dual therapy post-transplantation. Extending therapy from 48 weeks to 72 weeks of dual therapy is associated with increased SVR rates. Future studies examining the role of extended therapy are needed to confirm these findings, since the current study is a retrospective one.