Ultrasonographic analysis of cesarean scars features in nonpregnant uterus

OBJECTIVES: To define and assess the new ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean hysterotomy scars and to analyze their variation depending on the number of cesarean sections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Transvaginal ultrasound was carried out among 109 patients after cesarean section in the lower uterine segment with single-layer uterine closure. The following cesarean hysterectomy scar parameters were assessed: angle of the apex (K), basis (P) and height (W) of the anechoic triangle, the thickness of the knit tissue scar segment (G), G/P index and G/W index. RESULTS: Transvaginal ultrasound detected the cesarean hysterectomy scar in 100% of the examined woman. In 5.5% of cases the completely knit hysterectomy scar tissue was identified. All patients from this group underwent a single cesarean section. In the remaining 94.5% of women, the ultrasound detected a presence of the anechoic triangle, defined as scar defect. No difference of statistical importance considering assessed scar parameters was observed between the groups of patients after one and two cesarean sections. The decrease of the thickness of the knit tissue scar segment (G) in the group of patients after three cesarean, sections in comparison to the group of patients after single (1.3 mm vs. 6.7 mm, p = 0.0134) and two (1.3 mm vs. 7.4 mm, p = 0.0366) abdominal deliveries, was found, as well as statistically important decrease in G/P index value in the group of patients after three cesarean sections in comparison to the patients after one (0.3 vs. 1.3, p = 0.0263) and two cesarean sections (0.3 vs. 1.2, p = 0.0138). CONCLUSIONS: The new ultrasonographic parameters to assess the cesarean hysterectomy scar in nonpregnant uterus were introduced. Statistically important decrease in the thickness of the knit tissue scar segment (G) and G/P index value in the group of patients after three cesarean sections in comparison to the group of patients after single and two abdominal deliveries was revealed.     

Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate and indications of cesarean delivery after a successful external cephalic version. STUDY DESIGN: A case-control study was performed from patients who were delivered in a tertiary care center between 1987 and 2000. Each patient who underwent a successful external cephalic version (study group) was compared with the next woman with the same parity, who was delivered at term (control group). Nulliparous and multiparous women were analyzed separately. Chi-squared, Mann-Whitney, and Student t tests were used for statistical analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 602 patients were included in this study. The rates of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women (29.8% vs 15.9%; P<.001) and in multiparous women (15.9% vs 4.7%; P<.001) were significantly higher when compared with the control group. Patients with successful external cephalic version were more likely to have a cesarean delivery for dystocia (nulliparous, 22.5% vs 11.9%; P=.01; multiparous, 10.9% vs 1.3%; P<.01). After an adjustment for confounding variables, a successful external cephalic version was associated with an increased rate of cesarean delivery at term (nulliparous: odds ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.13-3.68; multiparous: odds ratio, 4.30; 95% CI, 1.76-10.54). CONCLUSION: The rate of cesarean delivery for dystocia is increased after a successful trial of external cephalic version in both nulliparous and multiparous women.     

Joel-Cohen or Pfannenstiel incision at cesarean delivery: does it make a difference?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the technique to open the abdomen might influence the operative time and the maternal and neonatal outcome. METHODS: All consecutive women who underwent a cesarean section at a gestational age greater than or equal to 32 weeks were randomly allocated to have either the Joel-Cohen or the Pfannenstiel incision. Exclusion criteria were two or more previous cesarean sections and previous longitudinal abdominal incision. During the study period 366 patients underwent a cesarean delivery. Of these patients, 56 did not meet the inclusion criteria. The remaining patients were allocated to the Joel-Cohen (n = 152) group and to the Pfannenstiel (n = 158) group. Extraction time was defined as the time interval from skin incision to the clamping of the umbilical cord. RESULTS: The total operative time was similar in both groups [Joel-Cohen 32 min (12-60) vs. Pfannenstiel 33 min (18-70)]. The extraction time was shorter in the Joel-Cohen group than in the Pfannenstiel group [190 s (60-600) vs. 240 s (50-600), p = 0.05]. This remained statistically significant after adjustment for confounding variables (Hazard = 1.26, p = 0.05). No difference was found between groups in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications. No difference was found in the neonatal neurodevelopmental assessment at 6 months of age in relation to the abdominal incision performed. CONCLUSION: The Joel-Cohen method of opening the abdomen at cesarean delivery is faster then the Pfannenstiel technique at delivering the fetus. However, considering the absence of benefits to the mother and the fetus there is no clear indication for performing a Joel-Cohen incision.     

Trial of Labor After Cesarean in Adolescents – A Multicenter Study

Study ObjectiveData regarding trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) among young women are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the TOLAC success rate and its related factors among adolescent women who had never delivered vaginally.DesignA multicenter retrospective cohort study of all adolescent women aged ≤21 years with a history of 1 previous cesarean delivery, who delivered in 2 tertiary medical centers during 2007-2019. Women were allocated to 2 groups: 1) women who underwent TOLAC, and 2) women who had a repeat cesarean delivery with no trial of labor. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. In addition, perinatal outcomes were compared between women with successful and unsuccessful TOLAC.ResultsThe study cohort included 167 women who had a previous caesarean delivery; 117 underwent TOLAC and 50 underwent a repeat cesarean delivery with no trial of labor. Neonatal birthweight (median 2937 vs 3170 g, P = .03) and gestational age at delivery (median 38 weeks vs 39, P = .009) were lower in the repeat cesarean group as compared to those undergoing TOLAC. Overall, 97 of 117 participants (83%) had a successful TOLAC. Failed TOLAC was associated low birthweight as compared to successful TOLAC (5 [25%] vs 7 [7%], odds ratio [OR] 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-15.3, P = .02), and birthweight difference between current and previous deliveries was higher in the failed TOLAC group (median 315 vs 197 g, P = .04). Rates of neonatal Apgar score at 1 minute < 7 and of neonatal intensive care unit admission were higher in the TOLAC failure group (4 [20%] vs 5 [5%], OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.1-19.0, P = .03, and 4 [20%] vs 4 [4%], OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.3-25.6, P = .02), respectively). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, only low birthweight was independently associated with TOLAC failure (adjusted OR 9.9, 95% CI 2.1-45.4, P = .003). Two cases of uterine rupture occurred in the no trial of labor group, whereas none were encountered in participants undergoing TOLAC.ConclusionsTOLAC in adolescent women who had never delivered vaginally is associated with a relatively high success rate.     

Can Joel-Cohen incision and single layer reconstruction reduce cesarean section morbidity?

OBJECTIVE: To compare an innovative cesarean section based on Joel-Cohen incision with the traditional Pfannenstiel technique in terms of operative data and post-operative recovery. METHOD: Out of 158 randomized patients, 83 patients underwent the innovative cesarean section (Joel-Cohen incision, one-layer locked uterine suture, no peritoneization) and 75 the traditional operative approach (Pfannenstiel incision, double layer closure of the uterus, visceral and parietal peritoneization). Operative data and post-operative morbidity were compared; sample size was calculated to detect a 13% difference in the occurrence of post-operative fever with a statistical power of 80%. RESULT: Post-operative fever was not different in the two groups. Total operating time was shorter with the innovative technique: 31.6 +/-1.38 min vs. 44.4+/-1.44 (P=0.0001) and fewer sutures were used: 3.6+/-0.13 vs. 6+/-0.13 (P=0.001). Patients operated by the new technique began moving sooner and intestinal function restarted earlier. CONCLUSION: The proposed technique made for shorter operating times and faster recovery but no decrease in puerperal morbidity.     

Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the risks and benefits of single-layer uterine closure at cesarean delivery on the index and subsequent pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of women delivered of their first live-born infants by primary low transverse cesarean delivery (1989-2001) and their subsequent pregnancy at our institution was performed. RESULTS: Of 768 women studied, 267 had single-layer and 501 had double-layer uterine closures in the index pregnancy. Single-layer closure was associated with slightly decreased blood loss (646 vs 690 mL, P<.01), operative time (46 vs 52 minutes, P<.001), endometritis (13.5% vs 25.5%, P<.001), and postoperative stay (3.5 vs 4.1 days, P<.001). In the second pregnancy, prior single-layer closure was not associated with uterine rupture after a trial of labor (0% vs 1.2%, P=.30), or other maternal or infant morbidities. Prior single-layer closure was associated with increased uterine windows (3.5% vs 0.7%, P=.046) at subsequent cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Single-layer uterine closure is associated with decreased infectious morbidity in the index surgery, but not uterine rupture or other adverse outcomes in the subsequent gestation.     

Active management of labor: is it suitable for a developing country?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of active management of labor in the setting of a developing country. METHODS: This historical cohort study compared the labor characteristics and outcome of all anti-HIV positive nulliparous pregnant women (n=96), who delivered between January 1991 and March 1999, treated with traditional labor management to all anti-HIV negative nulliparous pregnant women (n=1856), who delivered in 1998, treated with active management of labor in the tertiary center of a developing country. The year 1998 was chosen by using the total cesarean section rate of nulliparous patients from 1991 to 1998 to find the mean, then selected the year with cesarean section rate nearest to the mean as a control. Data were analyzed by the chi-square and t-tests. RESULTS: The length of labor was significantly shortened in the active management group (6.3+/-3.3 h vs. 8.9+/-6 h, P<0.001). A significantly greater proportion of the traditional management group had prolonged labor (29.3% vs. 4.9%, P<0.001). However, the cesarean section rate was not different between the two groups (active vs. traditional=17% vs. 14.6%, P=0.7) with dystocia as a major indication in both groups. Maternal and fetal complications were not different. CONCLUSION: The active management of labor shortened the duration of labor and reduced prolonged labor; however, it did not decrease the cesarean section rate.     

Deciding on route of delivery for obese women with a prior cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to estimate the vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) success rate, compare rates of infections in women attempting VBAC and those undergoing planned repeat cesarean, and compare the cost of these two plans of care for obese women.STUDY DESIGN: We performed a historical cohort analysis of singleton deliveries at ≥36 weeks' gestation in women with a body mass index 40 or greater and one prior cesarean delivery. Outcomes included rates of VBAC success and puerperal infections and mean cost of care.RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 122 mother-infant pairs, 61 each in the VBAC and cesarean groups. In the VBAC group, 57% (95% CI 45-70) of women were delivered vaginally. The VBAC group had higher rates of chorioamnionitis (13.1% vs 1.6%, P = .02), endometritis (6.6% vs 0%, P = .06), and composite puerperal infection (24.6% vs 8.2%, P = .01). Mean cost of care was similar for mothers ($4439 vs $4427, P = .95), infants ($1241 vs $1422, P = .49), and mother-infant pairs ($5680 vs $5851, P = .64).CONCLUSION: Compared with planned cesarean delivery, VBAC trials in obese women are three times as likely to be complicated by infection and do not result in reduced costs.     

新式剖宫产术与传统剖宫产术的比较

目的 探讨新式剖宫产术的临床意义。方法 将376例有剖宫产术指征的孕妇分为两组,其中研究组采用新式剖立产术(n=195例),对照组采用传统下腹部纵切口子宫下段剖宫产术(n=181例)。结果研究组总手术时间,手术开始到胎儿娩出时间,术后排气时间与对照组比较均明显缩短,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。两组术中出血量差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论 新式剖宫产术对产妇损伤小,术后恢复快;住院时间短,住院费用低;优于传统剖宫产术,值得临床推广应用。     

Vaginal Birth After Two or More Cesarean Sections: A Five-Year Experience

ABSTRACT: Allowing a trial of labor in patients who have had a single low transverse cesarean section has become increasingly accepted and widespread in the United States. Evidence with regard to the safety of this practice in patients with two or more prior cesarean births has, however, been sparse. We performed a retrospective review of the charts of 170 patients who had undergone two or more low transverse cesarean deliveries and subsequently delivered at Wishard Memorial Hospital between January 1, 1983, and December 31, 1987. Of 35 of these women who underwent a trial of labor, 27 (77%) had a successful vaginal delivery. No increase in maternal or fetal morbidity or mortality was associated with labor. The women who underwent trial of labor had fewer postpartum complications and shorter hospital stays. Although the number of patients in this study was small, growing evidence appears to support a trial of labor in patients with two or more prior cesarean sections as a safe and successful alternative to elective repeat cesarean section.     

Does labor influence neonatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely-low-birth-weight infants who are born by cesarean delivery?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of labor on extremely-low-birth-weight infants who were born by cesarean delivery with reference to neonatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes. We hypothesized that infants who are born by cesarean delivery without labor will have better outcomes than those infants who are born by cesarean delivery with labor. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of extremely-low-birth-weight infants (birth weight, 401-1000 g) who were born by cesarean delivery and cared for in the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Network, during calendar years 1995 to 1997. A total of 1606 extremely-low-birth-weight infants were born by cesarean delivery and survived to discharge. Of these, 1273 infants (80.8%) were examined in the network follow-up clinics at 18 to 22 months of corrected age and had a complete data set (667 infants were born without labor, 606 infants were born with labor). Outcome variables that were examined include intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 to 4, periventricular leukomalacia, and neurodevelopmental impairment. RESULTS: Mothers in the cesarean delivery without labor group were older (P<.001), more likely to be married (P<.05), less likely to be supported by Medicaid (P<.01), more likely to have preeclampsia/hypertension (P<.001), more likely to receive prenatal steroids (P<.005), and less likely to have received antibiotics (P<.001). Infants who were born by cesarean delivery without labor had higher gestational age (P<.001), lower birth weight (P<.01), and were less likely to be outborn (P<.001). By univariate analysis, infants who were born by cesarean delivery with labor had a higher incidence of grade 3 to 4 intraventricular hemorrhage (23.3% vs 12.1%, P<.001), periventricular leukomalacia (8.5% vs 4.7%, P<.02), and neurodevelopmental impairment (41.7% vs 34.6%, P<.02). Logistic regression analysis that controlled for all maternal and neonatal demographic and clinical variables that were statistically associated with labor or no labor revealed that the significant differences in grade 3 to 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, and neurodevelopmental impairment were no longer evident. CONCLUSION: In extremely-low-birth-weight infants who were born by cesarean delivery and after control for other risk factors, labor does not appear to play a significant role in adverse neonatal outcomes and neurodevelopmental impairment at 18 to 22 months of corrected age.     

Uterine rupture: risk factors and pregnancy outcome

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at determining risk factors and pregnancy outcome in women with uterine rupture. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a population-based study, comparing all singleton deliveries with and without uterine rupture between 1988 and 1999. RESULTS: Uterus rupture occurred in 0.035% (n=42) of all deliveries included in the study (n=117,685). Independent risk factors for uterine rupture in a multivariable analysis were as follows: previous cesarean section (odds ratio [OR]=6.0, 95% CI 3.2-11.4), malpresentation (OR=5.4, 95% CI 2.7-10.5), and dystocia during the second stage of labor (OR=13.7, 95% CI 6.4-29.3). Women with uterine rupture had more episodes of postpartum hemorrhage (50.0% vs 0.4%, P<.01), received more packed cell transfusions (54.8% vs 1.5%, P<.01), and required more hysterectomies (26.2% vs 0.04%, P<.01). Newborn infants delivered after uterine rupture were more frequently graded Apgar scores lower than 5 at 5 minutes and had higher rates of perinatal mortality when compared with those without rupture (10.3% vs 0.3%, P<.01; 19.0% vs 1.4%, P<.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Uterine rupture, associated with previous cesarean section, malpresentation, and second-stage dystocia, is a major risk factor for maternal morbidity and neonatal mortality. Thus, a repeated cesarean delivery should be considered among parturients with a previous uterine scar, whose labor failed to progress.     

The routine use of cefazolin in cesarean section.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and safety of the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in women undergoing cesarean section. METHOD: Four hundred and forty-one women undergoing cesarean sections were randomly assigned either to a single dose of 1 g intravenous cefazolin or placebo after clamping of the umbilical cord. The primary outcome was the development of post-operative febrile morbidity and the secondary outcomes were infection-related complications. RESULT: There were 211 emergency and 230 elective cesarean sections. In the emergency cesarean sections, 34 (30.6%) women developed post-operative febrile morbidity in the placebo group compared to 11 (11%) women in the cefazolin group. This was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.001). Similarly, there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in the development of wound infection (P<0.001), use of therapeutic antibiotics (P = 0.001), and post-operative days in hospital (P = 0.003). No statistically significant differences were detected in the development of other infection-related complications. In the elective cesarean sections, no statistically significant differences were found in post-operative febrile morbidity and infection-related complications. There were no serious side effects related to the use of cefazolin. CONCLUSION: The routine use of a single dose of cefazolin is safe and effective in emergency but not elective cesarean section.     

Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) with traditional suturing during vaginal hysterectomy. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial involving 68 women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy for benign disease, 37 procedures were performed using EBVS and 31 using traditional suturing. The end points were procedure time, blood loss, number of ligatures used, postoperative pain score, and number of days in hospital. RESULTS: The procedure duration was shorter using EBVS (median duration, 32 vs. 40 min; P=.0003), with fewer ligatures (1 vs. 7; P<.0001) and less pain (median score, 4 vs. 6; P<.0001). There were no significant differences regarding blood loss (median, 100 vs. 160 mL; P=.36) and days in hospital (median, 2 vs. 2; P=.03). CONCLUSION: The EBVS system provided advantages over traditional suturing with regard to procedure time, number of ligatures used, and postoperative pain score.     

Obstetric outcome following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate obstetric outcomes following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) in obese women. METHODS: Obstetric outcomes were compared in a retrospective case-control study with 427 obese women, 13 who underwent LABG and 414 who did not. RESULTS: The mean weight gain during pregnancy was significantly lower in the LABG group than among controls (5.5 kg vs. 7.1 kg; P<0.05). The incidence of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, low birth weight, and fetal macrosomia was less in the LABG group (P<0.05), and the incidence of cesarean deliveries during labor was half in the LAGB group (15.3% vs. 34.4%; P<0.01). Neonatal outcomes were not significantly different in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among obese women, the incidence of adverse obstetric outcomes was less in those who underwent LABG than in those who did not. These results suggest that obese women who wish to become pregnant would decrease their risk of obstetric complications if they first underwent LAGB.     

Closure vs. nonclosure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency and severity of celiac adhesions following cesarean sections performed with and without closure of the parietal and visceral peritoneum. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study involved 612 women who underwent their second lower-segment transverse cesarean section. RESULTS: Nonclosure of the parietal peritoneum at the time of the first cesarean section was associated with significantly more visceral adhesions than closure (16.2% vs. 8.1%; P=0.003), and closure of the visceral peritoneum had a similar effect (16.1% vs. 6.7%; P=0.02). However, the difference in rates of severe adhesions was not statistically significant (12.9% vs. 17.6%; P=0.12). After controlling for confounding variables, it was found that closure of the parietal peritoneum reduced the rate of visceral adhesions 2.7-fold. Trial of labor before and fever after surgery increased the risk of severe adhesions 6.1-fold and 5.6-fold, respectively. CONCLUSION: Nonclosure of the peritoneum at primary cesarean section is associated with a significantly increased risk of visceral adhesions.     

Cesarean Delivery in Adolescents

Study ObjectiveTo examine the effect of maternal age on indication for primary cesarean delivery in low-risk nulliparous women.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingUrban academic tertiary care center.ParticipantsNulliparous women younger than 35 years of age delivering vertex-presenting singletons at term.InterventionsParticipants underwent spontaneous, operative or cesarean delivery.Main Outcome MeasuresMode of delivery, indication, and timing of cesarean delivery.ResultsAdolescents were half as likely to undergo cesarean delivery overall (odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.54), and more than one-third less likely to undergo cesarean delivery in labor (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.66). Adjustment for potential confounders did not alter the strength of these associations. Adolescents were half as likely to undergo cesarean delivery for failure to progress (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.43-0.54). There was no difference in the odds of cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77-1.06), or genital herpes (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.57-3.68). Induction, macrosomia, oxytocin augmentation, and any labor complication were all associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery. There was no difference in the duration of second stage for adolescents who delivered by cesarean delivery compared with adults (240.0 vs 237.7 minutes; P = .84), but adolescents who delivered vaginally had a second stage that was one-third shorter than adults (62.5 vs 100.3 minutes; P < .001).ConclusionAdolescents are half as likely to undergo primary cesarean delivery overall, and 40% less likely to undergo a primary cesarean delivery in labor, even after adjustment for multiple maternal, neonatal, and labor characteristics. This difference is not explained by differences in the duration of the second stage of labor.     

Rate of increase in oxytocin dose on the outcome of labor induction.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of arithmetic and geometric increases in oxytocin infusion dosage during induction of labor. METHODS: A total of 120 pregnant women requiring induction of labor at term were randomly assigned to receive oxytocin at dosages increasing arithmetically or geometrically. Maternal demographics, labor delivery data, and newborn outcomes were compared. The setting was the maternity unit of the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. RESULTS: The mean maximum rates of oxytocin delivery needed to achieve adequate uterine contractions were similar in the 2 groups (24.66+/-8.34 mU/min vs. 26.38+/-8.77 mU/min, P=0.24). Labor duration was significantly shorter in the geometric progression group (496.33+/-54.77 min vs. 421.34+/-63.91 min, P<0.001). There were no differences in the rates of cesarean sections, vaginal deliveries, or uterine hyperstimulation, or in neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: A geometric rise in the rate of oxytocin infusion delivery reduced the duration of labor without affecting the rates of cesarean sections and uterine hyperstimulation, or newborn outcomes.     

Comparison of labor progression between induced and noninduced multiparous women

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of labor induction is rising rapidly in the United States. Among multiparas, labor is often followed with traditional labor curves derived from noninduced pregnancies. We sought to determine how labor progression of multiparous women who presented in spontaneous labor differed from those who were electively induced with and from those induced without preinduction cervical ripening. METHODS: We analyzed data on all low-risk multiparous women with an elective induction or spontaneous onset of labor between 37(+0) and 40(+6) weeks of gestation from January 2002 to March 2004 at a single institution. The median duration of labor by each centimeter of cervical dilatation and the risk of cesarean delivery were computed for 61 women with preinduction cervical ripening and oxytocin induction, 735 women with oxytocin induction, and 1,885 women with a spontaneous onset of labor. An intracervical Foley catheter was used to ripen the cervix. RESULTS: Those women who experienced electively induced labor without cervical ripening had a shorter active phase of labor than did those admitted in spontaneous labor (99 minutes in induced labor versus 161 minutes in spontaneous labor, P < .001). However, the cesarean delivery rate was elevated in the induction group (3.9% versus 2.3%, P < .05). Women who underwent preinduction cervical ripening also had a shorter active phase than those admitted in spontaneous labor (109 minutes versus 161 minutes, P = .01). CONCLUSION: The pattern of labor progression differs for women with an electively induced labor without cervical ripening compared with those who present with spontaneous onset of labor.     

Cesarean section rate: much room for reduction

OBJECTIVE: To examine the indications and rate of cesarean section in referral hospitals. METHODS: Between January 2003 and December 2005, a total of 11,506 women delivered at King Hussein Medical Center, of which 2,075 cesarean sections (CS) were performed. Patients who underwent cesarean section were divided into three age subgroups: < 25 yr (n = 3,118), 25-35 (n = 6,147), and > 35 yr (n = 2,241), and two parity subgroups - primiparous (n = 3,326) and multiparous (n = 8,180). Information abstracted included maternal characteristics and indications for CS. Statistical analyses were performed using the Pearson chi-square test and Fisher's exact test to evaluate differences between the various subgroups. RESULTS: From a total of 11,506 deliveries that took place, 2,075 cesarean sections were performed with an incidence of 18%. According to age, the CS rate was 11.85%, 20.5% and 19.9%, respectively, in the three age subgroups. According to parity, the CS rate was 16.3% and 18.7% in the primiparous and multiparous women, respectively. When matched to age, the indications for CS showed no significant difference among the three age subgroups. When matched to parity, the indications also showed no significant difference between the two parity subgroups except for dystocia which was significantly higher in the primiparous compared to multiparous women (p < 0.01), and for repeated CS which was significantly higher in the multiparous compared to primiparous women (p < 0.0001) CONCLUSION: Some indications for cesarean section such as dystocia and fetal distress were over-utilized resulting in a high CS rate. Proper management of labor and precise interpretation of fetal heart tracing might be effective in reducing the cesarean section rate.