Neurotoxicity of nanoscale materials

Nanotechnology has been applied in consumer products and commercial applications, showing a significant impact on almost all industries and all areas of society. Significant evidence indicates that manufactured nanomaterials and combustion-derived nanomaterials elicit toxicity in humans exposed to these nanomaterials. The interaction of the engineered nanomaterials with the nervous system has received much attention in the nanotoxicology field. In this review, the biological effects of metal, metal oxide, and carbon-based nanomaterials on the nervous system are discussed from both in vitro and in vivo studies. The translocation of the nanoparticles through the blood–brain barrier or nose to brain via the olfactory bulb route, oxidative stress, and inflammatory mechanisms of nanomaterials are also reviewed.     

Approach to using mechanism-based structure activity relationship (SAR) analysis to assess human health hazard potential of nanomaterials

With the increasing use and development of engineered nanoparticles in electronics, consumer products, pesticides, food and pharmaceutical industries, there is a growing concern about potential human health hazards of these materials. A number of studies have demonstrated that nanoparticle toxicity is extremely complex, and that the biological activity of nanoparticles will depend on a variety of physicochemical properties such as particle size, shape, agglomeration state, crystal structure, chemical composition, surface area and surface properties. Nanoparticle toxicity can be attributed to nonspecific interaction with biological structures due to their physical properties (e.g., size and shape) and biopersistence, or to specific interaction with biomolecules through their surface properties (e.g., surface chemistry and reactivity) or release of toxic ions. The toxic effects of most nanomaterials have not been adequately characterized and currently, there are many issues and challenges in toxicity testing and risk assessment of nanoparticles. Based on the possible mechanisms of action and available in vitro and in vivo toxicity database, this paper proposes an approach to using mechanism-based SAR analysis to assess the relative human health hazard/risk potential of various types of nanomaterials.     

Artemia salina as a model organism in toxicity assessment of nanoparticles

Background

Because of expanding presence of nanomaterials, there has been an increase in the exposure of humans to nanoparticles that is why nanotoxicology studies are important. A number of studies on the effects of nanomatrials in in vitro and in vivo systems have been published. Currently cytotoxicity of different nanoparticles is assessed using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay on different cell lines to determine cell viability, a tedious and expensive method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Artemia salina test in comparison with the MTT assay in the assessment of cytotoxicity of nanostructures because the former method is more rapid and convenient and less expensive.

Methods

At the first stage, toxicity of different nanoparticles with different concentrations (1.56–400 μg/mL) was measured by means of the brine shrimp lethality test. At the second stage, the effect of nanoparticles on the viability of the L929 cell line was assessed using the MTT assay. Experiments were conducted with each concentration in triplicate.

Results

The results obtained from both tests (A. salina test and MTT assay) did not have statistically significant differences (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the A. salina test may expedite toxicity experiments and decrease costs, and therefore, may be considered an alternative to the in vitro cell culture assay.     

Effects of nanomaterial physicochemical properties on in vivo toxicity

It is well recognized that physical and chemical properties of materials can alter dramatically at nanoscopic scale, and the growing use of nanotechnologies requires careful assessment of unexpected toxicities and biological interactions. However, most in vivo toxicity concerns focus primarily on pulmonary, oral, and dermal exposures to ultrafine particles. As nanomaterials expand as therapeutics and as diagnostic tools, parenteral administration of engineered nanomaterials should also be recognized as a critical aspect for toxicity consideration. Due to the complex nature of nanomaterials, conflicting studies have led to different views of their safety. Here, the physicochemical properties of four representative nanomaterials (dendrimers, carbon nanotubes, quantum dots, and gold nanoparticles) as it relates to their toxicity after systemic exposure is discussed.     

Implications of in vitro dosimetry on toxicological ranking of low aspect ratio engineered nanomaterials

Abstract

In vitro high throughput screening platforms based on mechanistic injury pathways are been used for hazard assessment of engineered nanomaterials (ENM). Toxicity screening and other in vitro nanotoxicology assessment efforts in essence compare and rank nanomaterials relative to each other. We hypothesize that this ranking of ENM is susceptible to dispersion and dosimetry protocols, which continue to be poorly standardized. Our objective was to quantitate the impact of dosimetry on toxicity ranking of ENM. A set of eight well-characterized and diverse low aspect ratio ENMs, were utilized. The recently developed in vitro dosimetry platform at Harvard, which includes preparation of fairly monodispersed suspensions, measurement of the effective density of formed agglomerates in culture media and fate and transport modeling was used for calculating the effective dose delivered to cells as a function of time. Changes in the dose–response relationships between the administered and delivered dose were investigated with two representative endpoints, cell viability and IL-8 production, in the human monocytic THP-1 cells. The slopes of administered/delivered dose–response relationships changed 1:4.94 times and were ENM-dependent. The overall relative ranking of ENM intrinsic toxicity also changed considerably, matching notably better the in vivo inflammation data (R^2?=?0.97 versus 0.64). This standardized dispersion and dosimetry methodology presented here is generalizable to low aspect ratio ENMs. Our findings further reinforce the need to reanalyze and reinterpret in vitro ENM hazard ranking data published in the nanotoxicology literature in the light of dispersion and dosimetry considerations (or lack thereof) and to adopt these protocols in future in vitro nanotoxicology testing.     

In vitro assessments of nanomaterial toxicity

Nanotechnology has grown from a scientific interest to a major industry with both commodity and specialty nanomaterial exposure to global populations and ecosystems. Sub-micron materials are currently used in a wide variety of consumer products and in clinical trials as drug delivery carriers and imaging agents. Due to the expected growth in this field and the increasing public exposure to nanomaterials, both from intentional administration and inadvertent contact, improved characterization and reliable toxicity screening tools are required for new and existing nanomaterials. This review discusses current methodologies used to assess nanomaterial physicochemicial properties and their in vitro effects. Current methods lack the desired sensitivity, reliability, correlation and sophistication to provide more than limited, often equivocal, pieces of the overall nanomaterial performance parameter space, particularly in realistic physiological or environmental models containing cells, proteins and solutes. Therefore, improved physicochemical nanomaterial assays are needed to provide accurate exposure risk assessments and genuine predictions of in vivo behavior and therapeutic value. Simpler model nanomaterial systems in buffer do not accurately duplicate this complexity or predict in vivo behavior. A diverse portfolio of complementary material characterization tools and bioassays are required to validate nanomaterial properties in physiology.     

Zebrafish as a correlative and predictive model for assessing biomaterial nanotoxicity

The lack of correlative and predictive models to assess acute and chronic toxicities limits the rapid pre-clinical development of new therapeutics. This barrier is due in part to the exponential growth of nanotechnology and nanotherapeutics, coupled with the lack of rigorous and robust screening assays and putative standards. It is a fairly simple and cost-effective process to initially screen the toxicity of a nanomaterial by using invitro cell cultures; unfortunately it is nearly impossible to imitate a complimentary invivo system. Small mammalian models are the most common method used to assess possible toxicities and biodistribution of nanomaterials in humans. Alternatively, Daniorerio, commonly known as zebrafish, are proving to be a quick, cheap, and facile model to conservatively assess toxicity of nanomaterials.     

Bio-active engineered 50 nm silica nanoparticles with bone anabolic activity: Therapeutic index,effective concentration,and cytotoxicity profile in vitro

Silica-based nanomaterials are generally considered to be excellent candidates for therapeutic applications particularly related to skeletal metabolism however the current data surrounding the safety of silica based nanomaterials is conflicting. This may be due to differences in size, shape, incorporation of composite materials, surface properties, as well as the presence of contaminants following synthesis. In this study we performed extensive in vitro safety profiling of ∼50 nm spherical silica nanoparticles with OH-terminated or Polyethylene Glycol decorated surface, with and without a magnetic core, and synthesized by the Stöber method. Nineteen different cell lines representing all major organ types were used to investigate an in vitro lethal concentration (LC) and results revealed little toxicity in any cell type analyzed. To calculate an in vitro therapeutic index we quantified the effective concentration at 50% response (EC₅₀) for nanoparticle-stimulated mineral deposition activity using primary bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). The EC₅₀ for BMSCs was not substantially altered by surface or magnetic core. The calculated Inhibitory concentration 50% (IC₅₀) for pre-osteoclasts was similar to the osteoblastic cells. These results demonstrate the pharmacological potential of certain silica-based nanomaterial formulations for use in treating bone diseases based on a favorable in vitro therapeutic index.     

Adoption of in vitro systems and zebrafish embryos as alternative models for reducing rodent use in assessments of immunological and oxidative stress responses to nanomaterials

Assessing the safety of engineered nanomaterials (NMs) is paramount to the responsible and sustainable development of nanotechnology, which provides huge societal benefits. Currently, there is no evidence that engineered NMs cause detrimental health effects in humans. However, investigation of NM toxicity using in vivo, in vitro, in chemico, and in silico models has demonstrated that some NMs stimulate oxidative stress and inflammation, which may lead to adverse health effects. Accordingly, investigation of these responses currently dominates NM safety assessments. There is a need to reduce reliance on rodent testing in nanotoxicology for ethical, financial and legislative reasons, and due to evidence that rodent models do not always predict the human response. We advocate that in vitro models and zebrafish embryos should have greater prominence in screening for NM safety, to better align nanotoxicology with the 3Rs principles. Zebrafish are accepted for use by regulatory agencies in chemical safety assessments (e.g. developmental biology) and there is growing acceptance of their use in biomedical research, providing strong foundations for their use in nanotoxicology. We suggest that investigation of the response of phagocytic cells (e.g. neutrophils, macrophages) in vitro should also form a key part of NM safety assessments, due to their prominent role in the first line of defense. The development of a tiered testing strategy for NM hazard assessment that promotes the more widespread adoption of non-rodent, alternative models and focuses on investigation of inflammation and oxidative stress could make nanotoxicology testing more ethical, relevant, and cost and time efficient.     

In vitro nanotoxicity of single-walled carbon nanotube–dendrimer nanocomplexes against murine myoblast cells

Single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and polyamidoamine dendrimers (PAMAM) have been proposed for a variety of biomedical applications. The combination of both molecules makes this new composite nanomaterial highly functionalizable and versatile to theranostic and drug-delivery systems. However, recent toxicological studies have shown that nanomaterials such as SWCNTs and PAMAM may have high toxicity in biological environments. Aiming to elucidate such behavior, in vitro studies with different cultured cells have been conducted in the past few years. This study focuses on the effects of SWCNT–PAMAM nanomaterials and their individual components on the C2C12 murine cell line, which is a mixed population of stem and progenitor cells. The interactions between the cells and the nanomaterials were studied with different techniques usually employed in toxicological analyses. The results showed that SWCNT–PAMAM and PAMAM inhibited the proliferation and caused DNA damage of C2C12 cells. Data from flow cytometry revealed a less toxicity in C2C12 cells exposed to SWCNT compared to the other nanomaterials. The results indicated that the toxicity of SWCNT, SWCNT–PAMAM and PAMAM in C2C12 cells can be strongly correlated with the charge of the nanomaterials.     

Biologic responses to nanomaterials depend on exposure,clearance, and material characteristics

Nanomaterials create challenges for the toxicology and risk assessment communities. While some nanomaterials are not new, such as colloids and the nano fractions of polydisperse aerosols such as welding fume, others are novel and unexplored. In addition to elucidating biologic responses, we also need to characterize human exposure, and to better understand the pharmacokinetics and translocation potential of nanomaterials. For example, do the smallest nanoparticles cross the air-blood barrier more readily, and can they enter cells via non-endocytic mechanisms? To what extent do nanofibers share the remarkable properties of asbestos fibers? Can carbon nanotubes find their way to the pleural space or not? More generally, we need to craft the laws of nanotoxicology. How do the size, shape, and surface chemistry of nanoparticles influence their anatomic fate and biologic consequences? Parallel to the rapid growth of nanotechnology must be a thoughtful development of the field of nanotoxicology.     

Assessment of the toxic potential of graphene family nanomaterials

Graphene, a single-atom-thick carbon nanosheet, has attracted great interest as a promising nanomaterial for a variety of bioapplications because of its extraordinary properties. However, the potential for widespread human exposure raises safety concerns about graphene and its derivatives, referred to as graphene-family nanomaterials. This review summarizes recent findings on the toxicological effects and the potential toxicity mechanisms of graphene-family nanomaterials in bacteria, mammalian cells, and animal models. Graphene, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide elicit toxic effects both in vitro and in vivo, whereas surface modifications can significantly reduce their toxic interactions with living systems. Standardization of terminology and the fabrication methods of graphene-family nanomaterials are warranted for further investigations designed to decrease their adverse effects and explore their biomedical applications.     

Nanotoxicological study of polyol-made cobalt-zinc ferrite nanoparticles in rabbit

The increasing use of engineered nanomaterials in commercial manufacturing and consumer products presents an important toxicological concern. Superparamagnetic zinc-cobalt ferrite nanoparticles (SFN) emerge as a promising tool for early cancer diagnostics and targeted therapy. However, toxicity and biological activities of SFN should be evaluated in vitro and in vivo in animal before any clinical application. In this study we aim to synthesize and characterize such objects using polyol process in order to assess its nanotoxicological profile in vitro as well as in vivo. The produced particles consist of a cobalt-zinc ferrite phase corresponding to the Zn_0.8Co_0.2Fe₂O₄ composition. They are isotropic in shape single crystals of 8 nm in size. The thermal variation of their dc-magnetization confirms their superparamagnetic behavior. In vitro, acute exposure (4 h) to them (100 μg mL⁻¹) induced an important decrease of healthy Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) viability. In vivo investigation in New-Zealand rabbits revealed that they lead to tissue toxicities; in lungs, liver and kidneys. Our investigations report, for the first time as far as we know, that SFN exhibit harmful properties in human cells and mammals.     

Current in vitro methods in nanoparticle risk assessment: Limitations and challenges

Nanoparticles are an emerging class of functional materials defined by size-dependent properties. Application fields range from medical imaging, new drug delivery technologies to various industrial products. Due to the expanding use of nanoparticles, the risk of human exposure rapidly increases and reliable toxicity test systems are urgently needed. Currently, nanoparticle cytotoxicity testing is based on in vitro methods established for hazard characterization of chemicals. However, evidence is accumulating that nanoparticles differ largely from these materials and may interfere with commonly used test systems. Here, we present an overview of current in vitro toxicity test methods for nanoparticle risk assessment and focus on their limitations resulting from specific nanoparticle properties. Nanoparticle features such as high adsorption capacity, hydrophobicity, surface charge, optical and magnetic properties, or catalytic activity may interfere with assay components or detection systems, which has to be considered in nanoparticle toxicity studies by characterization of specific particle properties and a careful test system validation. Future studies require well-characterized materials, the use of available reference materials and an extensive characterization of the applicability of the test methods employed. The resulting challenge for nanoparticle toxicity testing is the development of new standardized in vitro methods that cannot be affected by nanoparticle properties.     

Iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles as antimicrobials for therapeutics

Abstract

The use of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles (IMNP) in medical and pharmaceutical areas dates to the beginning of the 1970s, as carriers. Some other uses to these nanoparticles are in vitro separation, magnetic resonance imaging and drug targeting agent. Many preparations containing IMNP have been described and used in drug delivery, hyperthermia, in vitro separation, tissue repair, cellular therapy, for magnetic separation, magnetic resonance imaging, as spoilers for magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and more recently as sensors for metabolites and other biomolecules. The use of these nanostructures as antibacterial agents has also been reported, which could kill some bacteria species causing no damage to the human host cells. Recently, they have been used as hyperthermia agents to treat infections or cancer, which are more susceptible than the healthy host’s cells. Engineering designs, physiochemical characteristics, biomedical applications of IMNP, toxicity and magnetic nanotoxicology have been discussed. However, the application of IMNP as antimicrobials is very important. Thus, this review explores the therapeutic activities of IMNP and their use as antimicrobial agents. These nanoparticles can be efficient for the treatment of microbial infections, probably acting as membrane permeability enhancer, damaging the cell wall or by generating reactive oxygen species.     

There's plenty of room at the forum: Potential risks and safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials

The celebrated physicist and Nobel laureate Richard Feynman was the first to predict the opportunities presented by the manipulation of matter at the level of individual atoms and molecules. Today, almost 50 years after his classic lecture on the wonders of the small world, the evolving nanotechnologies have the potential to bring about major changes in the lives of citizens. However, the very same properties that make engineered nanomaterials so promising from a technological perspective, such as their high degree of reactivity and the ability to cross biological barriers, could also make these novel materials harmful to human health and the environment. Therefore, exploitation of the full potential of the nanotechnologies requires close attention to safety issues. The 1st Nobel Forum mini-symposium on nanotoxicology was recently held in Stockholm, Sweden, and the program was devoted to the topic of definitions and standardization in nanotoxicological research, as well as nano-specific risk assessment and regulatory/legislative issues. Examples of recent and ongoing studies of carbon-based nanomaterials, including single-walled carbon nanotubes, using a wide range of in vitro and in vivo model systems were also presented. The current review will provide some highlights and conclusions from this exciting meeting.     

What's new in Nanotoxicology? Brief review of the 2007 literature

The use and commercial potential of engineered nanomaterials is increasing, but questions of occupational and public health safety remain. Here, we review research published in 2007 concerning toxicology of nanomaterials. Articles were selected from the Medline Pubmed database, published or pre-published during 2007, using keywords (nanomaterials or nanoparticles or nanostructures) and (toxicity or health). From the 238 articles, we chose to concentrate mainly on research into carbonaceous (carbon nanotubes [CNTs] and fullerenes) and metallic materials (pure metal, oxides), because of their relevance. The induction of oxidative stress was repeatedly reported, and new information on the movement of nanomaterials through membranes was publicized. Concerning CNTs, information was revealed on DNA damage in vitro and pulmonary and systemic in vivo effects. Several of the reports failed to follow recent expert recommendations concerning good practice for nanotoxicologic research, complicating the integration of the new data into the larger picture of safety of nanomaterials.     

Overcoming the stability,toxicity, and biodegradation challenges of tumor stimuli-responsive inorganic nanoparticles for delivery of cancer therapeutics

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Stimuli-responsive nanomaterials for cancer therapy have attracted much interest recently due to their potential for improving the current standard of care. Different types of inorganic nanoparticles are widely employed for the development of these strategies, but in some cases safety concerns hinder their clinical translation. This review aims to provide an overview of the challenges that inorganic nanoparticles face regarding their stability, toxicity, and biodegradability, as well as the strategies that have been proposed to overcome them.

Areas covered: The available information about the in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility, as well as the biodegradability of the following nanoparticles, is presented and discussed: superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles, graphene and mesoporous nanoparticles made of silicon or silicon oxide. The toxicology of inorganic nanoparticles is greatly affected by many physicochemical parameters, and their surface modification emerges as the main intervention to improve their biocompatibility and tailor their performance for specific biomedical applications.

Expert opinion: Even though many different studies have been performed regarding the biological behavior of inorganic nanoparticles, long-term in vivo data is still scarce, limiting our capacity to evaluate the proposed nanomaterials for clinical use. The role of biodegradability in different therapeutic contexts is also discussed.     

A review of hepatic nanotoxicology – summation of recent findings and considerations for the next generation of study designs

ABSTRACT

The liver is one of the most important multi-functional organs in the human body. Amongst various crucial functions, it is the main detoxification center and predominantly implicated in the clearance of xenobiotics potentially including particulates that reach this organ. It is now well established that a significant quantity of injected, ingested or inhaled nanomaterials (NMs) translocate from primary exposure sites and accumulate in liver. This review aimed to summarize and discuss the progress made in the field of hepatic nanotoxicology, and crucially highlight knowledge gaps that still exist.

Key considerations include

• In vivo studies clearly demonstrate that low-solubility NMs predominantly accumulate in the liver macrophages the Kupffer cells (KC), rather than hepatocytes.

• KCs lining the liver sinusoids are the first cell type that comes in contact with NMs in vivo. Further, these macrophages govern overall inflammatory responses in a healthy liver. Therefore, interaction with of NM with KCs in vitro appears to be very important.

• Many acute in vivo studies demonstrated signs of toxicity induced by a variety of NMs. However, acute studies may not be that meaningful due to liver’s unique and unparalleled ability to regenerate. In almost all investigations where a recovery period was included, the healthy liver was able to recover from NM challenge. This organ’s ability to regenerate cannot be reproduced in vitro. However, recommendations and evidence is offered for the design of more physiologically relevant in vitro models.

• Models of hepatic disease enhance the NM-induced hepatotoxicity.

The review offers a number of important suggestions for the future of hepatic nanotoxicology study design. This is of great significance as its findings are highly relevant due to the development of more advanced in vitro, and in silico models aiming to improve physiologically relevant toxicological testing strategies and bridging the gap between in vitro and in vivo experimentation.     

Electrospun nanofibers as versatile platform in antimicrobial delivery: current state and perspectives

Nanotechnology has attracted increasing interest in different aspects of biotechnology. The fabrication of electrospun nanofibers (NFs) containing antibacterial agents for antimicrobial applications has been significantly enhanced in recent years. In the current review, various electrospun NFs with antimicrobial properties were introduced and evaluated. The main focus was on the recent developments and applications of antimicrobial electrospun NFs incorporated with different antimicrobial agents, including metal nanoparticles (NPs), antibiotics, quaternized ammonium compounds, triclosan, herbal extracts, carbon nanomaterials, and antimicrobial biopolymers with inherent antimicrobial properties. The search results revealed that antimicrobial containing electrospun NFs had enhanced antimicrobial performance with various biomedical applications compared to the traditional antimicrobial materials. According to the reported results, most of the studies were of an investigative nature and were mostly based on in vitro tests. Hence, further examination on in vivo clinical performance of these antimicrobial NFs seems necessary. However, these antimicrobial NFs appear to have the potential to achieve clinical usefulness and commercial production in the near future.