Dermatan sulphate in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Patients with thromboembolic diseases who develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II require an alternative anticoagulation strategy. Dermatan sulphate (DS) was administered to five patients with thromboembolic diseases who developed HIT type II and showed an in vitro cross-reactivity with low molecular weight heparins. The platelet count and the extension of thrombosis were monitored during DS administration. In four of the five patients the platelet count rapidly increased after heparin was discontinued and DS started. A low platelet count persisted in the single patient with cross-reactivity to DS, up to 4 d after its discontinuation. None of the patients experienced thrombus extension, haemorrhagic side-effects or other adverse events.     

Anticoagulation with recombinant hirudin and danaparoid sodium in pediatric patients

Patients receiving heparin are at risk of developing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Whereas in HIT I only reversible mild thrombocytopenia occurs within the first days of heparin treatment, HIT II may lead to potentially life-threatening thromboembolic events. Pediatric patients suffering from HIT II have been reported in a study on newborns and in a few reports on children and adolescents. However, thrombotic complications can be as severe in children as they are in adults. In the case of HIT II, the withdrawal of heparin is required and alternative anticoagulation should be started. In contrast to numerous investigations in adult patients, including prospective studies, experience with alternative anticoagulants in pediatric patients is limited. The available data were analyzed according to HIT II complications, alternative anticoagulation, and clinical outcome. In conclusion, HIT II represents a potentially dangerous complication of heparin therapy in pediatric patients also. Alternative anticoagulation applied in pediatric patients mainly included danaparoid sodium and recombinant hirudin. In most patients treated with these anticoagulants, effective anticoagulation and clinical improvement were observed. Because of limited experience, more data are required for optimal management of HIT II in young patients.     

Percutaneous interventions in patients with immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

The use of unfractionated heparin, the traditional antithrombotic agent during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), is associated with the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, a rare but often fatal clinical condition. This article focuses on several issues related to heparin-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia (HIT, type II) and alternative modes of periprocedural anticoagulation in patients with suspected or known HIT. The hypercoagulable state characterizing HIT, along with mechanical plaque disruption resulting from PCI place patients with HIT at particular risk of thrombosis during PCI. Given that a diagnosis of HIT precludes any further use of heparin, other treatment modalities are essential. Direct thrombin inhibitors are the drugs of choice in this challenging situation. These agents offer several advantages as anticoagulants for patients with HIT: (1) the ability to inhibit both thrombin that is bound to fibrin (clot-bound thrombin) and fluid-phase free thrombin; (2) rapid achievement of steady state; and (3) no cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies. Recent data on the use of bivalirudin, lepirudin, and argatroban in the setting of PCI in patients with HIT are encouraging. Optimal dosing regimens for argatroban, lepirudin, and bivalirudin should be further established in PCI patients.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Summary Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), next to bleeding complications, is the most important side-effect of heparin therapy in cardiac patients and the most frequently found thrombocytopenia induced by medication. Two types of HIT are distinguished on the basis of both severity of disease, and pathophysiology: type I HIT is an early, transient, clinically harmless form of thrombocytopenia, due to direct heparin-induced platelet aggregation. Thromboembolic complications are usually not seen. No treatment is required. A normalization of platelet count even if heparin is continued is a usual observation. Type II HIT is more severe than type I HIT and is frequently complicated by extension of preexisting venous thromboembolism or new arterial thrombosis. The thrombocytopenia is caused by a pathogenic heparin-dependent IgG antibody (HIT-IgG) that recognizes as its target antigen a complex consisting of heparin and platelet factor IV. Type II HIT should be suspected when the platelet count falls to less than 100,000 per cubic millimeter or less than 50% of the base line value 5 to 15 days after heparin therapy is begun, or sooner in a patient who received heparin in the recent past. The clinical diagnosis of type II HIT can be confirmed by several sensitive assays. In cases of type II HIT, heparin must be stopped immediately. However, if the patient requires continued anticoagulant therapy for an acute event such as deep venous thrombosis, substitution of an alternative rapid-acting anticoagulant drug is often needed. In the authors experience Danaparoid sodium, a low-sulfated heparinoid with a low cross-reactivity (10%) to heparin, can be regarded as an effective anticoagulant in patients with type II HIT. Preliminary experiences with intravenous recombinant hirudin are also encouraging and suggest that this direct thrombin inhibitor will emerge as a valuable alternative treatment for patients who suffer from HIT.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Thrombocytopenia is a common adverse effect of heparin therapy. Two types of heparin^linduced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are observed clinically - an early onset mild thrombocytopenia (Type I) in which the patients remain asymptomatic and a delayed onset severe thrombocytopenia (Type II). Patients with Type II HIT have an increased risk of thrombotic complications which frequently cause crippling disability e.g. limb amputation or even death. Type I HIT, the commoner of the two types, is believed to be due to the platelet proaggregating effect of heparin itself but Type II HIT is generally agreed to be caused by an immune mechanism, in which heparin-antibody complexes bind to platelets resulting in platelet activation, reduced platelet survival, thrombocytopenia and, in some cases, thrombosis. The diagnosis of HIT is made mainly on a clinical basis but in patients with suspected Type II HIT, laboratory test for the heparin-dependent antibody using platelet aggregometry or the two-point ¹⁴C-serotonin release method, allows confirmation of the diagnosis. In most Type I and all Type II patients, heparin should be stopped and warfarin commenced if there is a recent or new thrombosis requiring continuing anticoagulation. An alternative antithrombotic drug such as low molecular weight heparinoid (Org 10172) or dextran should be given at the same time until warfarin becomes therapeutic. The use of low molecular weight heparins (e.g. Fragmin) should be avoided unless it can be demonstrated that the HIT antibody does not cross-react with these drugs. (Aust NZ J Med 1992; 22: 145–152.)     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in pediatrics.

As in adult patients, heparin is used for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolism in newborns, children, and adolescents. Patients receiving heparin are potentially at risk to develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT type II has been extensively described in the adult population; only a few reports address HIT type II in pediatric patients (total of 15 neonates, 4 young children, 12 older children and adolescents). The available data are discussed, and the case of a patient with recurrent thrombosis and HIT type II without thrombocytopenia is presented. The review of the literature reveals that HIT type II occurs especially in neonates and adolescents, corresponding to the two age peaks of thrombosis in pediatric patients. Risk factors for thrombosis include hereditary factors, immobilization, and surgery. HIT complications are severe and partly lead to life-threatening thromboembolism. In three patients, an increasing heparin demand was found. In five cases, thrombocytopenia was absent. Heparin was replaced mostly by danaparoid sodium; in three patients hirudin was used as an alternative anticoagulant. HIT type II represents a potentially dangerous complication of heparin therapy in pediatric patients and should be taken into consideration whenever heparin is given for prophylactic or therapeutic use in newborns, children, or adolescents.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are two types of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT I is characterized by a transitory, slight and asymptomatic reduction in platelet count, occurring in the first 1-2 days of therapy, that resolves spontaneously; in contrast, HIT II, which has an immunologic origin, is characterized by a significant thrombocytopenia generally after the fifth day of therapy that usually resolves in 5-15 days only after therapy withdrawal. HIT II is the most frequent and dangerous side-effect of heparin therapy; in fact, in spite of thrombocytopenia, it can be complicated by venous and arterial thrombosis. Therefore, the recognition of HIT II may be difficult due to the underlying thrombotic symptoms for which heparin is administered. The aim of this article is to review the most recent advances in the field and to give critical guidelines for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of HIT II. STATE OF THE ART: The prevalence of HIT II, as confirmed by laboratory tests, seems to be about 2% in patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UH), while it is much lower in those receiving low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The immunologic etiology of HIT II is largely accepted. Platelet factor 4 (PF4) displaced from endothelial heparan sulphate or directly from the platelets, binds to the heparin molecule to form an immunogenic complex. The anti-heparin/ PF4 IgG immunocomplexes activate platelets and provoke an immunologic endothelial lesion with thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis. The IgG anti-heparin/PF4 immunocomplex activates platelets mainly through binding with the FcgRIIa (CD32) receptor. The onset of thrombocytopenia is independent of the dosage, schedule and route of administration of heparin. Orthopedic and cardiovascular surgery patients receiving post-surgical prophylaxis or treatment for deep venous thrombosis are at higher risk of HIT II. Besides thrombocytopenia, cutaneous allergic manifestations and skin necrosis may be present. Hemorrhagic events are not frequent, while the major clinical complications in 30% of patients are both arterial and venous thromboses which carry a 20% mortality. The diagnosis of HIT II should be formulated on the basis of clinical criteria and in vitro demonstration of heparin-dependent antibodies. Functional tests, such as platelet aggregation and (14)C-serotonin release assay and immunologic tests, such as the search for anti-PF4/heparin complex antibodies by an ELISA method are available. If HITT II is probable, heparin must be immediately suspended and an alternative anticoagulant therapy should be initiated before resolution of thrombocytopenia and the following treatment with a vitamin K antagonist. The general opinion is to administer low molecular weight heparin (in the absence of in vitro cross-reactivity with the antibodies), heparinoids such as Orgaran or direct thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin. PERSPECTIVES: Further studies are required to elucidate the pathogenesis of HIT II and especially to discover the clinical and immunologic factors that induce the occurrence of thrombotic complications. The best therapeutic strategy remains to be confirmed in larger clinical trials.     

Have You Been HIT?

This review is specifically designed to aid the vascular surgeon in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare complication of heparin administration, which poses significant morbidity and mortality. Its onset is usually 5 to 10 days after the heparin administration and should be suspected if platelet counts drop by at least 50%. Confirmation is given by the presence of HIT antibodies on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or in functional platelet activation assays. The major complication is thrombosis and surprisingly bleeding is rare. Heparin must be stopped immediately if there is a clinical suspicion of HIT and alternative anticoagulation must be started. Anticoagulation is required for at least 2 to 3 months to prevent recurrence of thrombosis. Oral anticoagulation with warfarin should not be initiated until the platelet count has been recovered and there should be an overlap of at least 5 days between starting warfarin and stopping the alternative anticoagulant.     

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia resulting from preceding exposure to heparin catheter flushes

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening adverse effect of heparin. It can result from any type of heparin exposure and by any route of administration; however only a few cases are reported after exposures to small quantities of heparin from catheter flushes. The major clinical problem associated with HIT is thrombosis. Early detection and institution of alternative, non-heparin anticoagulation are important. We report a patient with HIT associated with use of therapeutic-dose unfractionated heparin in whom immune sensitization to heparin was triggered by two 500-unit exposure to UFH associated with intravascular catheter flushing for antineoplastic chemotherapy in a patient with colon adenocarcinoma.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: analysis of risk factors in medical inpatients

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an unpredictable reaction to heparin characterized by thrombocytopenia and increased risk of life-threatening venous and/or arterial thrombosis. Data are lacking regarding additional risk factors that may be associated with the development of HIT. This study aimed to identify the risk factors that may be associated with HIT in medical inpatients receiving heparin. Twenty five thousand six hundred and fifty-three patients admitted to the medicine service who received heparin product were reviewed retrospectively. The diagnosis of HIT was confirmed if the platelet count dropped >50% from baseline and there was a positive laboratory HIT assay. Fifty-five cases of in-hospital HIT were observed. Multivariate analysis identified the administration of full anticoagulation dose with unfractionated heparin or exposure to heparin products for more than 5 d with an increased risk of HIT. Moreover, patients who were on haemodialysis, carried a diagnosis of autoimmune disease, gout or heart failure were also at increased risk. The results suggest that when using heparin products in these patient cohorts, increased surveillance for HIT is necessary.     

Lethal heparin-associated pulmonary embolism--case reports

Thrombocytopenia is a known adverse reaction occurring in some patients receiving heparin. Two different types of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have been described. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type I is a mild thrombocytopenia after 1 to 4 days of heparin therapy, attributed to a direct interaction between heparin and circulating platelets. No specific treatment is necessary. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II is a severe thrombocytopenia mediated by an immunologic mechanism. Type II generally develops after 5 to 10 days of heparin therapy and can be associated with potentially devastating thromboembolic complications. The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II is below 3%. Thromboembolic events are always accompanied by a decrease in the platelet count, however, complications in the absence of absolute thrombocytopenia have been reported. Diagnosis of HIT type II is based on clinical features and laboratory studies for the heparin-dependent platelet antibody. Immediate cessation of heparin administration is essential. Several alternative anticoagulant therapies have been studied and have shown promising results when used for this purpose. Two patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery are presented in whom pulmonary embolism developed due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II. In both cases, platelet counts were within the subnormal range at the time of the first thromboembolic complication. The clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic implications are discussed.     

Risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a clinicopathological syndrome associated with heparin therapy that is characterized by a decrease in platelet counts and/or the development of a new thrombosis. Two types of HIT exist, type I is nonimmune and self-resolves, whereas type II is immune-mediated and clinically important. The formation of antibodies against the platelet factor 4-heparin complexes results in platelet activation and thrombin formation, which lead to an increased risk of thrombosis. Unfractionated heparin is associated with a higher risk of HIT than low-molecular-weight heparins. Surgical patients, particularly those undergoing orthopedic or cardiac surgery, are at higher risk of HIT than medical patients. Treatment of HIT involves heparin cessation together with anticoagulation with direct thrombin inhibitors or indirect factor Xa inhibitors.     

Practical viewpoints on the diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT, type II) is an immune-mediated disorder due to antibodies formed against heparin-platelet factor 4 complexes, usually appearing at days 5 to 14 after initiation of heparin. It is important to recognize HIT because heparin prophylaxis or treatment paradoxically associates with new venous and/or arterial thrombosis. Early clinical suspicion and diagnosis together with proper pharmacotherapy and close laboratory monitoring are the cornerstones for successful management. This includes monitoring of Thrombocytopenia, its Timing to heparin administration, appearance of new Thrombosis or resistance to treatment, and differential diagnosis by exclusion of o Ther causes (the 4T's). Specific attention should be paid to the absence or presence of thrombosis and to tailoring thromboprophylaxis or anticoagulant therapy with a nonheparin alternative. Even in the absence of HIT-associated thrombosis, an active policy for prolonged thromboprophylaxis is demanded. Rapid and reliable assays should be developed for diagnosis and anticoagulation monitoring to secure safe management with nonheparins. Semiquantitative testing for on-call hours should be available and later confirmed as clinically needed. Alternative therapeutic options are available, but because their use is infrequent, experienced coagulation treatment centers should provide guidance in the treatment and in laboratory monitoring. Most of the evidence in HIT is grade IC, and thus the best evidence is provided by clinical experience. New anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors may offer future alternatives in the management of HIT, but the current treatment options provide the best experience and benefit. The joint clinical and laboratory guidelines provided in this article along with two practical case scenarios were prepared by a Nordic expert panel. They will be valuable for hematologists and colleagues who do not routinely encounter HIT.     

New Concepts in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Diagnosis and Management

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a clinicopathologic condition and adverse drug reaction caused by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies directed against the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. In most patients, the onset of thrombocytopenia begins while the patient is receiving heparin. In less than 5% of patients, the onset of thrombocytopenia begins several days following heparin discontinuation and has been termed “delayed-onset” HIT. This review summarizes the presentation and clinical course of published reports of delayed-onset HIT occurring in 30 patients. The diagnosis of delayed-onset HIT should be considered in all patients presenting with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and all patients with recent heparin exposure (within the past 14 days) who present with a low platelet count. Most patients with HIT are treated with direct thrombin inhibitors and transitioned to warfarin oral anticoagulation. Administration of direct thrombin inhibitors requires close monitoring for bleeding, dose adjustments based upon coagulation monitoring and is costly. Fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide and indirect-acting factor-Xa inhibitor, has little to no cross-reactivity with the heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody in in vitro testing. This review summarizes dosing, monitoring and outcomes of preliminary reports of fondaparinux successfully administered to 13 patients with subacute HIT and 22 patients with acute HIT. While several reports have described the treatment and prophylaxis of thrombosis in patients with HIT using fondaparinux, clinical trials should be conducted and reported before fondaparinux becomes a therapy of choice for HIT.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-alternative anticoagulation in pregnancy and lactation

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) appears rarely in pregnant patients who are being treated with heparin. When HIT is suspected, heparin treatment should be discontinued and alternative anticoagulation should be started. The heparinoid danaparoid appears to be the drug of choice for acute treatment and prophylaxis because of its low placental permeability. Between the 12th and 36th weeks of pregnancy, either danaparoid may be continued or warfarin may be used after recovery of platelet counts. Before and during delivery, danaparoid should be preferred over warfarin in order to avoid bleeding complications in mother and infant. Hirudin should only be used when either cross-reactivity with heparin-induced antibodies or cutaneous allergy against heparinoids are observed. Postpartum warfarin seems to be the treatment of choice because breast-feeding can be continued. Alternative treatment with either danaparoid or hirudin is possible, but data on treatment with these reagents in lactating mothers are very limited.     

Hirudin therapy during thrombolysis for venous thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the most common drug-related thrombocytopenia. Thromboembolic complications occur in approximately 50% of patients with HIT and result in limb amputation and death in up to 20% and 30% respectively. Because patients with a history of HIT may require future intravenous anticoagulation but have a high-risk of thromboembolism if re-challenged with heparin, alternative therapies are necessary when further anticoagulation is indicated. The use of direct thrombin inhibitors in HIT patients who also require thrombolytic therapy offers unique challenges to anticoagulant monitoring and safety. We present a case of progressive ileofemoral deep venous thrombosis in a patient with a history of HIT in order to review the combined use of hirudin and thrombolysis in this setting.     

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Acknowledging Its Presence in Low-Molecular Weight Heparin Therapy

Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is associated with a lower incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) than is unfractionated heparin. We describe a 75-year-old woman who developed HIT with thrombotic manifestations following the use of nadroparin calcium. Subsequent anticoagulation was achieved with warfarin. This case serves to highlight an important complication that cannot be ignored despite its low incidence. The majority of HIT cases are likely to occur in LMWH-treated patients because LMWH replaces unfractionated heparin for most indications. The lack of suitable alternative anticoagulant treatments for patients with HIT in Singapore is also emphasized.     

The use of direct thrombin inhibitors in cardiovascular surgery in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

One of the most important adverse drug reactions that physicians encounter is the life- and limb-threatening prothrombotic syndrome known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Unfractionated heparin (UFH), administered during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), is highly immunogenic. Heparin-dependent antibodies can develop in 25 to 50% of UFH-treated cardiac surgery patients within 5 to 10 days. These antibodies can activate platelets and are considered the causative agents of HIT. HIT is a relatively common complication, occurring in 1 to 3% of cardiovascular surgery patients when UFH administration is continued postoperatively. It is strongly associated with new thromboembolic events leading to limb amputation and death. In acute or recent (< 100 days) HIT, alternative anticoagulatory regimens are needed during CPB surgery for prevention of HIT-related thrombosis. Treatment options for such patients now generally include the use of alternative anticoagulants such as lepirudin, bivalirudin, or danaparoid, as well as a combined treatment with platelet-function inhibitors and heparin. In patients with a history of HIT and no detectable antibodies, heparin is currently the safest approach for high-dose anticoagulation during CPB. Before and after surgery, however, alternative anticoagulants should be used. The risk of clinical HIT after heart surgery could potentially be reduced by using low-molecular-weight heparins for postsurgery anticoagulation.     

Low-dose fondaparinux in suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the critically ill

BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is estimated to account for approximately 1 to 10% of all causes of thrombocytopenia. HIT exerts a strong procoagulant state. In case of suspected HIT, it is an important clinical decision to stop heparin and start treatment with alternative nonheparin anticoagulation, awaiting the results of laboratory testing for the final diagnosis of HIT (bridging therapy). Fondaparinux acts by factor Xa inhibition and expresses no cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies. Excretion of fondaparinux is mainly renal. We describe our early experience with fixed low-dose fondaparinux bridging therapy and monitoring of anticoagulant activity for safety reasons. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a closed format general intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. Consecutive critically ill patients suspected of HIT were treated with fondaparinux after discontinuation of unfractionated heparin or nadroparin. Anti-Xa levels were determined afterwards. RESULTS: Seven patients were treated with fondaparinux 2.5 mg/day for 1.8 to 6.5 days. Anti-Xa levels varied from 0.1 to 0.6 U/ml. A negative correlation was found between creatinine clearance and mean and maximum anti-Xa levels. No thromboembolic complications occurred. Bleeding complications were only minor during fondaparinux treatment. Transfusion requirements did not differ significantly between treatment episodes with fondaparinux or with heparin anticoagulants. CONCLUSION: In this small sample of critically ill patients suspected of HIT, bridging therapy with fixed low-dose fondaparinux resulted in prophylactic and therapeutic anti-Xa levels. Monitoring of anticoagulant activity is advised in patients with renal insufficiency.     

Hemostasis and Thrombosis: Clinical Usefulness of Combined use of Platelet Aggregation Test and Anti PF4-H. Antibodies Elisa test for the Diagnosis of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia

Background. Heparin is the most commonly used drug in patients requiring therapeutic anticoagulation. But the use of heparin has serious side effects such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The diagnosis of HIT is often difficult. This study was designed to test the diagnosis value of 2 laboratory tests: the platelet aggregation test and the ELISA test (Enzym Linked Immuno-Sorbent Assay). Methods and Results. In order to evaluate the diagnostic value of these 2 tests, we prospectively performed both tests in all patients referred to our laboratory with suspected type II HIT, and compared their results with clinical outcome. Plasmas from 60 patients suspected of HIT, were tested for heparin-dependent platelet-reactive antibodies with a platelet agregation test (PAT) and with an ELISA which detects anti heparin platelet factor 4 antibodies (Anti PF4-H Ab). Among the 60 explored patients, the clinical diagnosis of HIT was confirmed in 27 patients by clinical criteria. In 16 of these 27 patients, PAT and anti PF4-H. Ab were both positive, and in the 11 other patients, one of the 2 tests was negative. In 29 of the 33 patients with no clinical HIT, PAT and anti PF4-H. Ab were both negative, in the 4 remaining patients, one of the 2 tests was positive. Conclusion. For 75% of patients, biological results were concordant with the final clinical diagnosis. The combination of both tests is more reliable than the use of a single test; in the present series, all patients with positive results on both tests had clinically confirmed HIT, and all patients with negative results on both tests had not clinically confirmed HIT.