MDL 73,147EF, a 5-HT3 antagonist, facilitates latent inhibition in the rat.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral model of selective attention that has been used to study the attentional deficits seen in schizophrenia. In the present study, we examined the effect of 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptor blockade on LI using the conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure. Prior exposure to 20, 30, or 40 stimulus presentations significantly, and almost completely, inhibited the CER to that stimulus. This LI effect was much weaker when only 10 preexposures were given. 1H-indole-3-carboxylic acid, trans-octahydro-3-oxo-2,6-methano-2H-quinolizin-8-yl ester methanesulfonate (MDL 73,147EF), a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, significantly facilitated the LI effect observed after 10 preexposures at 0.1 mg/kg but not at 0.01 mg/kg. The magnitude of this effect was comparable to that observed with the classical neuroleptic haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg). Neither MDL 73,147EF nor haloperidol affected the CER in animals not preexposed to the stimulus. These results strongly corroborate suggestions that 5-HT3 receptor antagonists will be of use in the treatment of schizophrenia.     

Restoration of latent inhibition by olanzapine but not haloperidol in entorhinal cortex-lesioned rats

RATIONALE: Latent inhibition (LI) refers to the decrease in conditioned response induced by the repeated non-reinforced pre-exposure to the conditioned stimulus before its pairing with the unconditioned stimulus during the conditioning stage. LI has been considered as a relevant animal model for the study of the biological bases of schizophrenia. LI has recently been demonstrated to depend on the integrity of the entorhinal cortex, as lesioning of this area disrupted LI. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to verify whether the classical neuroleptic haloperidol and/or the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine would prevent the effect of entorhinal cortex lesioning. METHODS: LI was studied in an off-baseline conditioned emotional response (CER) paradigm in which a tone is paired with a footshock. Entorhinal cortex lesions were produced by the electrolytic method. After a recovery period, both lesioned and control rats received either haloperidol (0.3 mg/kg), olanzapine (0.3 mg/kg) or vehicle before both the pre-exposure and conditioning stages of the experiment. RESULTS: In control rats, pre-exposure to the tone induced LI, which was affected by neither haloperidol nor olanzapine. Lesioning of the entorhinal cortex produced a deficit of LI, which was restored by olanzapine but not by haloperidol. CONCLUSIONS: This result suggests a dissociation of the anatomical and pharmacological targets of the two drugs. The possible involvement of dopamine D3 receptors in the effects of olanzapine is discussed.     

Latent inhibition in 35-day-old rats is not an "adult" latent inhibition: implications for neurodevelopmental models of schizophrenia

Rationale Latent inhibition (LI) refers to retarded conditioning to a stimulus as a consequence of its inconsequential preexposure. Amphetamine-induced disruption of LI and its potentiation by antipsychotic drugs (APDs) in the adult rat are well-established models of schizophrenia and antipsychotic drug action, respectively. It is not clear whether LI can be similarly modulated at prepubertal age.Objectives In view of the notion that schizophrenia is a neurodevelopmental disorder whose overt expression depends on postpubertal brain maturational processes, we investigated whether several manipulations known to modulate LI in adult rats, including systemic administration of amphetamine and the atypical APD clozapine, are capable of producing the same effects in prepubertal (35-day-old) rats.Methods LI was measured in a thirst motivated conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure in which rats received 10 or 40 tone preexposures followed by 2 or 5 tone-footshock pairings.Results Like in adults, LI was present with 40 preexposures and 2 conditioning trials. In contrast to findings in adults, LI was resistant to disruption by amphetamine at a dose (1 mg/kg) that significantly increased locomotor activity, as well as by reducing the number of preexposures to ten, increasing the number of conditioning trials to five, or changing the context between preexposure and conditioning. Clozapine (5 mg/kg) and the selective 5HT2A antagonist M100907 (0.3 mg/kg) administered in conditioning were without an effect on "persistent" LI with extended conditioning, but were capable of disrupting LI when administered in the preexposure stage, as found in adults.Conclusion The results point to functionality within brain systems regulating LI acquisition but not those regulating LI expression in periadolescent rats, further suggesting that postpubertal maturation of the latter systems may underlie schizophrenia-mimicking LI disruption reported in adult rats following perinatal manipulations and possibly disrupted LI observed in schizophrenia.     

Facilitation of latent inhibition by the atypical antipsychotic risperidone

The action of the atypical antipsychotic risperidone on latent inhibition (LI), an animal model of schizophrenia, was investigated. The parameters of the procedure were set at values insufficient to generate LI in control rats. On the first day, rats administered 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg ip risperidone or vehicle were preexposed (PE) to 10 tone presentations. On the second day, they were again injected with drug or vehicle and then submitted to two conditioned stimulus (CS; tone)-unconditioned stimulus (US; shock) pairings. On the third day, suppression of their drinking response under the CS was measured. Nonpreexposed (NPE) animals were submitted to the same procedure except for the tone preexposure. On the suppression test, LI was not observed in control rats as well as in animals given 0.5 mg/kg risperidone. Animals given 1.0 and 2.0 mg risperidone, however, displayed an LI effect. The facilitation of LI by risperidone gives additional support to the LI paradigm as an animal model of schizophrenia.     

Effects of clozapine on latent inhibition in the rat

In the present study we have examined the effect of clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic drug, on latent inhibition (LI) using the conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure. In this procedure, ten pre-exposures to the to-be-conditioned stimulus result in weak or no LI whereas 30 pre-exposures produce robust LI. Three different experimental protocols were used to study the effects of clozapine: facilitation of LI in animals subjected to ten pre-exposures to the to-be-conditioned stimulus; antagonism of the disruptive effect of amphetamine (1mg/kg, s.c.) on LI in animals receiving 30 pre-exposures; antagonism of the disruptive effect of nicotine (0.6mg/kg, s.c.) on LI in animals receiving 30 pre-exposures. High doses of clozapine (3 and 10mg/kg, s.c.) disrupted the CER in non pre-exposed animals. Despite this, clozapine significantly facilitated the development of LI at 1 and 10mg/kg and significantly attenuated the disruptive effects of nicotine at 0.3 and 1mg/kg and of amphetamine at 2 and 5mg/kg. These results demonstrate that clozapine is active in the LI model and further support the utility of this model in the study of mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs.     

Clozapine and haloperidol reinstate latent inhibition following its disruption during amphetamine withdrawal.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral phenomenon whereby repeated exposure to a non-reinforced stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. Deficits in LI may reflect an inability to ignore irrelevant stimuli and are studied as a model of the cognitive/attentional abnormalities found in schizophrenia. We recently determined that pretreatment with escalating doses of the indirect dopamine agonist amphetamine (AMPH; 3 daily injections ip, 1-5 mg/kg, over 6 days) disrupts LI in rats tested in a 2-way active avoidance paradigm during withdrawal. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of the atypical neuroleptic clozapine and the typical neuroleptic haloperidol on the expression of LI on day 4 of AMPH withdrawal. Neuroleptic injections were given either 45 min prior to each of two tone preexposure sessions and a subsequent tone-shock avoidance test session, or only prior to the test session. As expected, saline-injected control groups showed LI during the test session, as reflected by significantly reduced avoidance in tone preexposed vs. non-preexposed rats. In contrast, animals pretreated with escalating doses of AMPH did not show LI, due to the improved avoidance of the preexposed animals. Both haloperidol (0.03 mg/kg) and clozapine (5 mg/kg) largely reversed the disruptive influence of AMPH on LI regardless of whether these drugs were administered prior to both preexposure and test sessions or only prior to the test session. These results provide pharmacological validation for an AMPH withdrawal model of schizophrenic symptoms.     

Phencyclidine does not disrupt latent inhibition in rats: implications for animal models of schizophrenia.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which prior exposure to a stimulus not followed by reinforcement retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus when it is paired with reinforcement. The development of LI reflects a process of learning to ignore, or tune out, irrelevant stimuli. Three experiments investigated the effects of phencyclidine (PCP) on LI. The investigation was carried out using a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was repeatedly presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. The three stages were conducted 24 h apart. In Experiment 1, 1 mg/kg PCP was administered either in the preexposure or in the conditioning stage or in both. Experiment 2 used 5 mg/kg PCP in the same procedure. In Experiment 3, 5 mg/kg PCP was administered throughout the LI procedure, including the test stage. In all three experiments, PCP did not affect LI. The implications of these findings for the development of animal models of schizophrenia are discussed.     

The sigma ligand BMY-14802 as a potential antipsychotic: evidence from the latent inhibition model in rats

Latent inhibition (LI) is a measure of retarded conditioning to a previously-presented nonreinforced stimulus, that is impaired in schizophrenic patients and in rats treated with amphetamine. Neuroleptic drugs are known to produce two effects in this test paradigm: to antagonise amphetamine-induced disruption of LI, and to enhance LI when administered on their own. The present experiments tested the effects on LI of a potential antipsychotic, sigma ligand BMY-14802. The experiments used a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure in rats licking for water, consisting of three stages: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus (a tone) was repeatedly presented without being followed by reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with reinforcement (a foot shock); and test, in which LI was indexed by animals' degree of suppression of licking during tone presentation. In Experiment 1, 20 tone preexposures and two conditioning trials were given and the effects of 5, 15, and 30mg/kg BMY-14802 were assessed. Experiment 2 tested the effects of 15 and 30mg/kg on LI using ten preexposures and two conditioning trials. Experiment 3 investigated the effects of 15 and 30mg/kg on LI using 40 preexposures and extended conditioning consisting of five tone-shock pairings. Experiments 4 and 5 investigated antagonism of amphetamine-induced disruption of LI by 15 and 30mg/kg BMY-14802, respectively. BMY-14802 was found to antagonise amphetamine-induced disruption of LI and enhance LI when low numbers of preexposures and two conditioning trials were given, but not following extended conditioning. These results provide partial support for the suggestion that BMY-14802 may possess antipsychotic properties.     

Systemic administration of MK-801 produces an abnormally persistent latent inhibition which is reversed by clozapine but not haloperidol

Abstract Rationale. Latent inhibition (LI) refers to retarded conditioning to a stimulus as a consequence of its inconsequential pre-exposure, and disrupted LI in the rat is considered to model an attentional deficit in schizophrenia. Blockade of NMDA receptor transmission, which produces behavioral effects potentially relevant to schizophrenic symptomatology in several animal models, has been reported to spare LI. Objectives. To show that systemic administration of the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK-801 will lead to an abnormally persistent LI which will emerge under conditions that disrupt LI in controls, and that this will be reversed by the atypical neuroleptic clozapine but not by the typical neuroleptic haloperidol, as found for other NMDA antagonist-induced models. Methods. LI was measured in a thirst-motivated conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure by comparing suppression of drinking in response to a tone in rats which previously received 0 (non-pre-exposed) or 40 tone exposures (pre-exposed) followed by two (experiment 1) or five (experiments 2–5) tone – foot shock pairings. Results. MK-801 at doses of 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg reduced conditioned suppression while no effect on suppression was seen at the 0.05 mg/kg dose. At the latter dose, intact LI was seen with parameters that produced LI in controls (40 pre-exposures and two conditioning trials). Raising the number of conditioning trials to five disrupted LI in control rats, but MK-801-treated rats continued to show LI, and this abnormally persistent LI was due to the action of MK-801 in the conditioning stage. MK-801-induced LI perseveration was unaffected by both haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) and clozapine (5 mg/kg) administered in conditioning, and was reversed by clozapine but not by haloperidol administered in pre-exposure. Conclusion. MK-801-induced perseveration of LI is consistent with other reports of perseverative behaviors, suggested to be particularly relevant to negative symptoms of schizophrenia, following NMDA receptor blockade. We suggest that LI perseveration may model impaired attentional set shifting associated with negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Moreover, the finding that the action of MK-801 on LI and the action of clozapine are exerted in different stages of the LI procedure suggests that the MK-801-based LI model may provide a unique screening tool for the identification of novel antipsychotic compounds, whereby the schizophrenia-mimicking LI abnormality is drug-induced, but the detection of the antipsychotic action is not dependent on the mechanism of action of the pro-psychotic drug. Electronic Publication     

Abolition of the expression but not the acquisition of latent inhibition by chronic amphetamine in rats

The animal amphetamine model of schizophrenia has been based primarily on stereotyped behavior. The present study sought to demonstrate an amphetamine-induced deficit in attentional processes. To this end, the effects of acute and chronic (14 days) 1.5 mg/kg dl-amphetamine administration on the ability of rats to ignore irrelevant stimuli were examined using the paradigm of latent inhibition (LI) in a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure. The procedure consisted of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditoned stimulus, tone, was presented without being followed by reinforcement; acquisition, in which the pre-exposed tone was paired with shock; and test, in which LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. Experiment 1 showed that chronic but not acute treatment abolished LI. Experiment 2 showed that animals receiving chronic amphetamine pretreatment but pre-exposed and conditioned without the drug, exhibited normal LI. In Experiment 3, animals which received chronic amphetamine pretreatment and were pre-exposed under the drug but conditioned without it, also showed normal LI. The implications of these results for the animal amphetamine model of schizophrenia are discussed.     

Abolition of the acquisition but not the expression of latent inhibition by chlordiazepoxide in rats

In the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, prior nonreinforced exposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus when it is paired with reinforcement. The development of LI reflects learning not to attend to, or ignore, stimuli which predict no significant consequences. The present experiment tested the effects of chlordiazepoxide (CDP) on LI using a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages given 24 hr apart: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. Preexposure and conditioning were given off-baseline. CDP (5 mg/kg) was administered only in preexposure, only in conditioning, in both stages or in neither. The administration of the drug during tone-shock conditioning conducted off-baseline markedly reduced animals' suppression to the tone in a subsequent licking test which was conducted without the drug. The administration of CDP during nonreinforced preexposure to the tone abolished the development of LI, i.e., drug-treated preexposed animals did not show reduced suppression as compared to drug-treated nonpreexposed animals. These results demonstrate that CDP: a) blocks the acquisition of classically conditioned fear and b) disrupts animals' ability to learn that stimuli predict no significant outcomes.     

Haloperidol and clozapine antagonise amphetamine-induced disruption of latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversion

Rationale Latent inhibition (LI) describes a process by which repeated pre-exposure of a stimulus without any consequence retards the learning of subsequent conditioned associations with that stimulus. It is well established that LI is impaired in rats and in humans by injections of the indirect dopamine agonist amphetamine (AMPH), and that this disruption can be prevented by co-administration of either the typical neuroleptic haloperidol (HAL) or the atypical neuroleptic clozapine (CLZ).Objectives Most of what is known of the pharmacology of LI is derived from studies using either the conditioned emotional response or the conditioned active avoidance paradigm. The goal of the present study was to determine whether these results would generalize to the conditioned taste aversion assay.Methods We tested whether AMPH (0.5 mg/kg) pretreatment would disrupt LI of a conditioned aversion to sucrose, and if so, which stage of the procedure is critical for mediating the disruption; in addition, we tested whether HAL (0.2 mg/kg) or CLZ (5.0 mg/kg) could restore such an expected LI disruption.Results We determined that AMPH disrupted LI when it was injected before pre-exposure and prior to conditioning, but not if the rats were injected before either stage alone. When HAL or CLZ was given 40 min before AMPH (before both pre-exposure and conditioning), it blocked LI disruption.Conclusion These results are in line with the pharmacology of LI as derived from other conditioning paradigms. We conclude that the pharmacological regulation of LI in the CTA paradigm is similar to what has been observed previously in the conditioned emotional response and the conditioned active avoidance paradigms.     

Disruption of latent inhibition induced by ovariectomy can be reversed by estradiol and clozapine as well as by co-administration of haloperidol with estradiol but not by haloperidol alone

Introduction

Epidemiological and clinical life cycle studies have indicated that the more favorable illness course and the better response to antipsychotic drugs (APDs) in women with schizophrenia correlate with high levels of estrogen, whereas increased vulnerability to exacerbation and relapse and reduced sensitivity to treatment are associated with low estrogen levels. Accordingly, the estrogen hypothesis of schizophrenia proposes that estrogen has a neuroprotective effect in women vulnerable to schizophrenia.

Materials and methods

Latent inhibition (LI), the capacity to ignore stimuli that received nonreinforced preexposure prior to conditioning, is disrupted in acute schizophrenia patients and in rats and humans treated with the psychosis inducing drug amphetamine. Disruption of LI is reversible by typical and atypical APDs. The present study tested whether low levels of estrogen induced by ovariectomy (OVX) would lead to disruption of LI in female rats and whether such disruption would be normalized by estrogen replacement treatment and/or APDs.

Results

Results showed that OVX led to LI disruption, which was reversed by 17β-estradiol (150 μg/kg) and the atypical APD clozapine (5 mg/kg), but not by the typical APD haloperidol (0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mg/kg). Haloperidol regained efficacy when administered with 17β-estradiol (50 μg/kg).

Discussion

These results provide the first demonstration in rats that low levels of hormones can induce a pro-psychotic state that is resistant to at least typical antipsychotic treatment. This constellation may mimic states seen in schizophrenic women during periods associated with low levels of hormones such as the menopause.     

Disruption of latent inhibition by acute administration of low doses of amphetamine

In the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, nonreinforced preexposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. Three experiments investigated the effects of acute amphetamine administration on LI in rats. Experiments 1 and 3 used a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure and Experiment 2 used two-way active avoidance procedure. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that, in both the CER and avoidance procedures, 1.5 mg/kg dl-amphetamine administered either in the preexposure or the conditioning stage alone did not disrupt LI. In contrast, amphetamine administered in both of the stages abolished LI. Experiment 3 showed that the abolition of LI was obtained when the preexposure and conditioning were given 24 hr apart but not when the two stages were given in one session.     

Antagonism of amphetamine-induced disruption of latent inhibition by the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine in rats

The present study aimed at characterising the effects of the new antipsychotic olanzapine in a Latent Inhibition (LI) paradigm. A conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure was used, consisting of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus (a tone) was presented six times without being followed by reinforcement; conditioning, in which the pre-exposed stimulus was paired twice with reinforcement (a foot shock); and test, in which LI was assessed by the suppression of licking during the tone presentation. In Experiment I, it was found that pre-treatment with an intermediate dose (0.312mg/kg) of olanzapine, but not with lower (0.003; 0.031mg/kg) or higher doses (0.625; 1.25mg/kg), restored LI in amphetamine-treated (1.5mg/kg) animals. This effect could not be attributed to a disruptive effect of olanzapine on CER learning, as olanzapine per se had no effect on this conditioning (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, olanzapine did not antagonise the amphetamine-induced locomotor hyperactivity. As olanzapine has not only dopaminergic, but also serotonergic, adrenergic, histaminergic and cholinergic activities, the differential effects of olanzapine on amphetamine-induced disruption of LI and hyperactivity may reflect an action on several pharmacological targets, possibly interacting with one another.     

7-OH-DPAT effects on latent inhibition: low dose facilitation but high dose blockade: implications for dopamine receptor involvement in attentional processes

7-OH-DPAT is a dopamine D2/D3 agonist, which at low doses acts preferentially on D3 receptors but at high doses it acts on D2 and D3 receptors. The present study investigated the contribution of D3 and D2 receptors on latent inhibition (LI) by using two dose levels of 7-OH-DPAT: a low dose, 0.1 mg/kg (D3 receptor activation) and a high dose, 1.0 mg/kg, (D2/D3 receptor activation) in a conditioned emotional response (CER) paradigm. The LI Protocols included CS pre-exposure (10 or 40 CS alone trials), CER induction and a non-drug CER test phase. Additionally, the drug effects upon CER acquisition without LI were assessed using the same treatments and test environment pre-exposure protocols but without the tone CS. The effects of 7-OH-DPAT on crossing, rearing and grooming were also measured in an open field 1 day after the CER test phase. The results showed that the low dose 7-OH-DPAT treatment potentiated LI at 10 but not at 40 CS pre-exposures. The high dose 7-OH-DPAT treatment blocked LI at both the 10 and 40 stimulus pre-exposures; and it also induced hyperactivity. Thus, D3 stimulation induced by a low dose of 7-OH-DPAT can facilitate LI but these effects are contingent upon and are specific to the number of stimulus presentations. Altogether, these findings indicate that D3 stimulation can enhance attentional processes, but D2 stimulation can impair attentional processes.     

Parametric and pharmacological modulations of latent inhibition in mouse inbred strains

Latent inhibition (LI) is a cross species selective attention phenomenon, which is disrupted by amphetamine and enhanced by antipsychotic drugs (APDs). Accumulating data of LI in gene-modified mice as well as in mouse inbred strains suggest genetic component of LI. Here we study modulation of LI in mouse inbred strains with spontaneously disrupted LI by parametric manipulations (number of pre-exposures and conditioning trials) and pharmacological treatments with antipsychotics and NMDA modulator, D-serine. C3H/He and CBA/J inbred mice showed disrupted LI under conditions with 40 pre-exposures (PE) and 2 trials of the conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-US) due to either loss of the pre-exposure effect or a ceiling effect of poor learning, respectively. The increased number of pre-exposures and/or number of conditioning trials corrected expression of LI in these inbred mice. The disrupted LI was also reversed by haloperidol in both inbred strains at 1.2 mg/kg but not at 0.4 mg/kg, as well as by clozapine (at 3 mg/kg in C3H/He and at 9 mg/kg in CBA/J mice). D-serine potentiated LI in C3H/He mice at 600 mg/kg, but not in the CBA/J at both studied doses (600 and 1800 mg/kg). Desipramine (10 mg/kg) had no effect on LI in both inbred mouse strains. Our findings demonstrated some resemblance between the effects of parametric and pharmacological manipulations on LI, suggesting that APDs may affect the capacity of the brain processes environmental stimuli in LI. Taken together, LI may offer a translational strategy that allows prediction of drug efficacy for cognitive impairments in schizophrenia.     

Long-term attentional deficit in nonhandled males: possible involvement of the dopaminergic system

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which nonreinforced pre-exposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. The development of LI is considered to reflect learning not to attend to, or ignore, irrelevant stimuli. In our previous studies investigating the effects of early handling on LI, we have shown that normal LI was obtained in handled males and females, as well as in nonhandled females. In contrast, nonhandled males failed to show LI. This finding pointed to a long-term attentional deficit in nonhandled males. Since there is evidence that the development of LI is mediated by the dopaminergic system, the present experiments tested the possibility that the attentional deficit of nonhandled males may be related to a dopaminergic dysfunction. Experiment 1 tested whether the administration of haloperidol, which was shown to enhance LI in normal animals, would reinstate the LI effect in nonhandled males. Infantile handled (Days 1–22) and nonhandled male and female rats were tested in maturity in the LI paradigm, using a conditioned emotional response procedure. Experiment 2 tested the locomotor response of handled and nonhandled males to 0.3, 1 and 2.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Experiment 1 showed that handled males, handled females and nonhandled females showed a normal LI effect, whereas nonhandled males failed to develop LI. Haloperidol enhanced LI in all the groups, but this effect was most dramatic in nonhandled males, in which the drug reinstated LI. Experiment 2 showed that nonhandled males exhibited a reduced locomotor response to d-amphetamine.     

Preexposure effects of nicotine and acetaldehyde on conditioned taste aversion induced by both drugs

Previous assessments have demonstrated an interaction between ethanol and nicotine in the conditioned taste-aversion (CTA) paradigm. The present study assessed whether acetaldehyde, the primary reinforcing metabolite of ethanol, would interact with nicotine as well. In six experiments, water-deprived male Wistar rats were preexposed to either acetaldehyde (0.2 or 0.3 g/kg, IP) or nicotine (0.8, 1.2, or 2 mg/kg, SC) for 3 consecutive days and then subsequently conditioned, 24 h later, with either nicotine (0.8, 1.2, or 2 mg/kg, SC) or acetaldehyde (0.2 or 0.3 g/kg, IP), respectively. There were 4 conditioning days and 4 drug-free test days, each spaced 72 h apart. On test days, animals were offered a free choice between water and saccharin. The results of the following set of experiments demonstrated a dose-related interaction between nicotine and acetaldehyde, where lower doses of each drug failed to attenuate CTA induced by one another, but a higher nicotine dose (2 mg/kg) attenuated the formation of a CTA induced by acetaldehyde (0.3 g/kg). It was argued that the primary metabolite of ethanol may play a role in the interaction between nicotine and ethanol previously observed.     

The differential effects of chlorpromazine and haloperidol on latent inhibition in healthy volunteers.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a measure of reduced learning about a stimulus to which there has been prior exposure without any consequence. It therefore requires a comparison between a pre-exposed (PE) and a non-pre-exposed (NPE) condition. Since, in animals, LI is disrupted by amphetamines and enhanced by antipsychotics, LI disruption has been proposed as a measure of the characteristic attentional deficit in schizophrenia: the inability to ignore irrelevant stimuli. The findings in humans are, however, inconsistent. In particular, a recent investigation suggested that since haloperidol disrupted LI in healthy volunteers, and LI was normal in non-medicated patients with schizophrenia, the previous findings in schizophrenic patients were entirely due to the negative effects of their medication on LI (Williams et al., 1998). We conducted two studies of antipsychotic drug effects on auditory LI using a within-subject, parallel group design in healthy volunteers. In the first of these, single doses of haloperidol (1 mg. i.v.) were compared with paroxetine (20 mg p.o.) and placebo, and in the second, chlorpromazine (100 mg p.o.) was compared with lorazepam (2 mg. p.o.) and placebo. Eye movements, neuropsychological test performance (spatial working memory (SWM), Tower of London and intra/extra dimensional shift, from the CANTAB test battery) and visual analogue rating scales, were also included as other measures of attention and frontal lobe function. Haloperidol was associated with a non-significant reduction in LI scores, and dysphoria/akathisia (Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale) in three-quarters of the subjects. The LI finding may be explained by increased distractibility which was indicated by an increase in antisaccade directional errors in this group. In contrast, LI was significantly increased by chlorpromazine but not by an equally sedative dose of lorazepam (both drugs causing marked decreases in peak saccadic velocity). Paroxetine had no effect on LI, eye movements or CANTAB neuropsychological test performance. Haloperidol was associated with impaired SWM, which correlated with the degree of dysphoria/akathisia, but no other drug effects on CANTAB measures were detected. We conclude that the effect of antipsychotics on LI is both modality and pharmacologically dependent and that further research using a wider range of antipsychotic compounds is necessary to clarify the cognitive effects of these drugs, and to determine whether there are important differences between them.