Paraesophageal herniation as a complication following laparoscopic antireflux surgery

Paraesophageal herniation of the stomach is a rare complication following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with 720 patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications. Seven patients were found to have postoperative paraesophageal hernias requiring reoperation. The clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, operative treatment, and outcome were evaluated. There were no deaths or procedure-related complications. Clinical presentation was recurrent dysphagia in four, nonspecific abdominal symptoms in one, and acute abdomen in one. One additional patient was asymptomatic. Preoperatively the correct diagnosis was able to be confirmed in four of six patients by barium esophagogram. Four patients underwent successful laparoscopic repair. Two patients had a thoracotomy including one conversion from laparoscopy to thoracotomy. One patient had a laparotomy to reduce an intrathoracic gastric volvulus. At a mean follow-up of 2.5 months no patient had further complications. Paraesophageal herniation is a rare complication following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and a definitive diagnosis is often difficult to establish. Early dysphagia after surgery should alert the surgeon to this complication. Redo laparoscopic surgery is feasible but an open procedure may be necessary.     

腹腔镜下Toupet胃底折叠术式治疗食管裂孔疝的临床应用

目的 探讨使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术的疗效和安全性.方法 对61例食管裂孔疝患者使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术,做胃底270°部分折叠术(Toupet术),19例应用补片修补疝缺口,42例采用直接线缝合.结果 61例腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术全部获得成功.手术时间30～190 rain,平均手术时间110 min,失血10～50 mL;术后24～48 h进流质饮食,无术后并发症;术后平均住院5.7 d.结论 61例患者的反酸症状均在24 h内缓解,术后停用抗酸药物,修补术具有疗效确定、安全和创伤小的优点,值得进一步推广应用.     

Controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair; a review of literature

Background The surgical repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PHH) can be performed by endoscopic means, but the procedure is not standardized and results have not been evaluated systematically so far. The aim of this review article was to clarify controversial subjects on the surgical approach and technique, i.e., recurrence rate after conventional versus laparoscopic PHH treatment, results of mesh reinforcement of the cruroplasty, the necessity for additional antireflux surgery, and indications for an esophageal lengthening procedure. Methods An electronic Medline search was performed to identify all publications reporting on laparoscopic and conventional PHH surgery. The computer search was followed by additional hand searches in books, journals, and related articles. All types of publications were evaluated because of a lack of high-level evidence studies such as randomized controlled trials. Critical analysis followed for all articles describing a study population of >10 patients and those reporting postoperative outcome. Results A total of 32 publications were reviewed. Randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open techniques could not be identified. Nineteen of the publications described the results of retrospective series. Therefore, most of the studies retrieved were low in hierarchy of evidence (level II-c or lower). The overall median hospital time as published was 3 days for patients operated laparoscopically and 10 days in the conventional group. Postoperative complications, such as pneumonia, thrombosis, hemorrhage, and urinary and wound tract infections, appeared to be more frequent after conventional surgery. Follow-up was longer for conventional surgery (median 45 months versus 17.5 months after the laparoscopic technique). Recurrence rates reported were higher in patients operated conventionally (median 9.1% versus 7.0% for patients operated laparoscopically). Recurrences after PHH repair may decrease with usage of mesh in the hiatus, although uniform criteria for this procedure are lacking. No conclusions could be drawn regarding the necessity for an additional antireflux procedure. Furthermore, uniform specific indications for the need of an esophageal lengthening procedure or preoperative assessment methods for shortened esophagus could not be detected. Conclusion Treatment based on standardized protocols for preoperative assessment and postoperative follow-up is required to clarify the current controversies.     

Laparoscopic repair of a paraesophageal hiatus hernia without fundoplication

We treated a case of paraesophageal hiatus hernia by laparoscopic repair. The procedure included a reduction of the gastric fundus and duodenal bulbus, closure of the diaphragmatic defect, mesh wrapping of the closure, gastropexy to the diaphragm, and a gastrostomy. Preoperative monitoring of the pH for 24h showed no reflux. Intraoperative intraluminal manometry of the esophagus after hernia reduction showed the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter to be normal, and thus an antireflux procedure was not deemed to be necessary. The patient was put on a soft diet from postoperative day 2. A postoperative upper gastrointestinal series showed no gastroesophageal reflux. No complications or recurrence of the hiatus hernia have been observed in the 12 months since the operation. Laparoscopic repair of a paraesophageal hiatus hernia with normal pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter, so that fundoplication is not needed, is thus considered to be possible.     

Simultaneous laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and sleeve gastrectomy in the morbidly obese

BackgroundMorbid obesity is associated with increased rates of hiatal and paraesophageal hernias. Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is gaining popularity as the procedure of choice for morbid obesity, there is little data regarding the management of paraesophageal hernias found intraoperatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of a combined sleeve gastrectomy and paraesophageal hernia repair in morbidly obese patients.MethodsFrom May 2011 to February 2013, 23 patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with the repair of a paraesophageal hernia. Only 4 patients had a large hiatal hernia documented preoperatively on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The body mass index (BMI), operative time, length of stay, and complications were evaluated.ResultsThe average operative time was 165 minutes (115–240 minutes) and length of stay was 2.83 days (2–6 days). All patients were female except for one, with an average age of 53.4 years and a BMI of 41.9 kg/m². There were no complications during the procedures. Mean follow-up was 6.16 months (1–19 months), and mean excess weight loss was 39%. The average cost of admission for a combined procedure ($10,056), was slightly higher than a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ($8905) or laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair ($8954) done separately.ConclusionsLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with a paraesophageal hernia repair is well-tolerated and feasible in morbidly obese patients. Surgeons should be aware that preoperative EGD is not effective at diagnosing large hiatal or paraesophageal hernias. Surgeons with the skill set to repair paraesophageal hernias should do a combined procedure because it is well-tolerated, feasible, and can reduce the cost of multiple hospital admissions.     

Intrathoracic omental herniation through the esophageal hiatus: Report of a case

(Received for publication on Dec. 8, 1997; accepted on July 7, 1998)     

Disparity between symptomatic and physiologic outcomes following esophageal lengthening procedures for antireflux surgery

Although esophageal lengthening procedures (Collis gastroplasty) have been recommended as an adjunct to antireflux surgery in patients with shortened esophagus, there are few data on physiologic outcomes in these patients. This study details the long-term outcomes in patients who underwent antireflux surgery with Collis gastroplasty. All patients undergoing esophagogastric fundoplication (EGF) with a Collis gastroplasty for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease or paraesophageal hernia were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Symptom questionnaires were used during followup to assess symptomatic outcomes. Barium esophogram, upper endoscopy with biopsy, and catheterless esophageal acid monitoring (BRAVO system) were recommended for all patients. Patients with abnormal results of physiologic studies underwent further treatment based on a standardized algorithm. Between 1996 and 2002, a total of 68 patients underwent EGF with Collis gastroplasty. Twenty-seven (40%) had a large paraesophageal hernia, and 20 (30%) had undergone a prior EGF. Fifty-six (82%) of the procedures were performed laparoscopically. Mean follow-up time was 30 months, with 10 (15%) patients lost to latest follow-up. Symptomatic outcome data were available for 85% of patients, with significant improvements reported for heartburn (86%), chest pain (90%), dysphagia (89%), and regurgitation (91%). Most patients (84%) were off medications. Physiologic data were completed in 37% of the patients. Of those undergoing physiologic follow-up studies, 17% had recurrent hiatal hernia, and 80% had endoscopically identified esophagitis and pathologic esophageal acid exposure on pH testing. Despite this, 65% of the patients with objectively identified abnormalities reported significant symptomatic improvement compared to their preoperative symptoms. Two patients developed changes associated with Barrett’s esophagus that were not present preoperatively. Distal esophageal injury can persist after EGF with Collis gastroplasty, despite significant symptomatic improvements. Appropriate follow-up in these patients requires objective surveillance, which should eventuate in further treatment if esophageal acid is not completely controlled. Although the Collis gastroplasty is conceptually appealing, these results call into question the liberal application of this technique during EGF. Presented at the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Orlando, Florida, May 18–21, 2003 (oral presentation).     

Incarcerated paraesophageal hernia complicated by pancreatic damage and unusual comorbidity: Two retrospective case series

Introduction: About 1% of paraesophageal hernias (PEH) require emergency surgery due to obstruction or gangrene. We present two complicated cases of incarcerated PEH.Presentation of cases: A patient aged 18 with trisomy 21 was admitted after four days of vomiting and epigastric pain. CT scan revealed a large PEH. The stomach was massively dilated with compression of adjacent viscera and the celiac trunk. The stomach was repositioned laparoscopically and deflated by endoscopy in an attempt to avoid resection. During second look laparoscopy a gastrectomy was necessary. The patient was reoperated for intestinal obstruction, and treated for dehiscence of the esophagojejunostomy and a pancreatic fistula. A patient aged 65 with hereditary spastic paresis had two days history of emesis and epigastric pain. Upon arrival he was hemodynamically unstable and a CT scan revealed perforation of the herniated stomach. A subtotal gastrectomy without reconstruction was performed with vacuum closure of the abdomen. Later a gastrectomy was completed with a Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Except from reoperation for wound dehiscence after 14 days, the recovery was uneventful.Discussion: Trisomy 21 and hereditary spastic paresis may increase the risk of developing PEH. Challenges in regard to symptom evaluation may delay diagnosis. The pressure of the dilated stomach can give rise to ischemic and mechanical damage from compression of major blood vessels and organs. Urgent diagnosis and gastric deflation is required.Conclusions: In patients with known PEH or with comorbidity that may increase the risk of PEH, this diagnosis should be considered early on.     

Treatment of giant hiatal hernia by laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

IntroductionObesity is a risk factor for hiatal hernia. In addition, much higher recurrence rates are reported after standard surgical treatment of hiatal hernia in morbidly obese patients. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is an effective surgical treatment for morbid obesity and is known to effectively control symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD).Case presentationTwo patients suffering from giant hiatal hernias where a combined LRYGB and hiatal hernia repair (HHR) with mesh was performed are presented in this paper. There were no postoperative complications and at 1 year follow-up, there was no sign of recurrence of the hernia.DiscussionThe gold standard for all symptomatic reflux patients is still surgical correction of the paraesophageal hernia, including complete reduction of the hernia sac, resection of the sac, hiatal closure and fundoplication. However, HHR outcome is adversely affected by higher BMI levels, leading to increased HH recurrence rates in the obese.ConclusionConcomitant giant hiatal hernia repair with LRYGB appears to be safe and feasible. Moreover, LRYGB plus HHR appears to be a good alternative for HH patients suffering from morbid obesity as well than antireflux surgery alone because of the additional benefit of significant weight loss and improvement of obesity related co-morbidity.     

Laparoscopic mesh hiatoplasty for paraesophageal hernias and fundoplications

Background Little grade A medical evidence exists to support the use of prosthetic material for hiatal closure. Therefore, the authors compiled and analyzed all the available literature to determine whether the use of prosthetic mesh in hiatoplasty for routine laparoscopic fundoplications (LF) or for the repair of large (>5 cm) paraesophageal hernias (PEH) would decrease recurrence. Methods A literature search was performed using an inclusive list of relevant search terms via Medline/PubMed to identify papers (n = 19) describing the use of prosthetic material to repair the crura of patients undergoing laparoscopic PEH reduction, LF, or both. Results Case series (n = 5), retrospective reviews (n = 6), and prospective randomized (n = 4) and nonrandomized (n = 4) trials were identified. Laparoscopic procedures (n = 1,368) were performed for PEH, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), hiatal hernia, or a combination of the three. Group A (n = 729) had primary suture repair of the crura, and group B (n = 639) had repair with either interposition of mesh to close the hiatus or onlay of prosthetic material after hiatal or crural closure. The use of mesh was associated with fewer recurrences than primary suture repair in both the LF and PEH groups. The mean follow-up period did not differ between the groups (20.7 months for group A vs. 19.2 months for group B). None of the papers cited any instance of prosthetic erosion into the gastrointestinal tract. Conclusions The current data tend to support the use of prosthetic materials for hiatal repair in both routine LF and the repair of large PEHs. Longer and more stringent follow-up evaluation is necessary to delineate better the safety profile of mesh hiatoplasty. Future randomized trials are needed to confirm that mesh repair is superior to simple crural closure.     

Abdominal wall defects: pathogenesis,prevention and repair

‘Abdominal wall defects’ is a collective term used to describe two distinct pathologies: primary ventral hernias and incisional hernias. This article describes the pathogenesis, risk factors and the management of each.     

Groin hernias: features of recurrences

Summary In 2390 groin hernias operated on by the same surgeon there were 2327 inguinal hernias (97.4%) and 63 femoral (2.6%); 261 (11.2%) were recurrent hernias. The aim of this study was to define the different features of recurrences in a series of 206 recurrences operated on by an inguinal approach. The median time of recurrence was 3 years (< 1–58). It was < 1 year in 67 cases (40%) and 50% of all recurrences had occurred in 2.4 years. The time of recurrence after operation performed in childhood was 31 years (15–58). All recurrences were located in the area of the myo-pectineal and femoral orifices. There was only one site of recurrence in 125 cases (61%); the recurrence was direct in 73 cases (58%), indirect in 44 cases (35%) and femoral in 8 cases (7%). There were 2 sites of recurrence in 81 cases (39%), 76 mixed (94%) and 6 inguinal associated with a femoral hernia (6%). Altogether there were 288 sites of recurrence. There were 44 direct diverticular recurrences and 26 of these were located near the pubic tubercle. The rate of recurrence in current practice is much higher than that in specialized centers. The long delay of recurrence after simple resection of the sac in childhood constitutes an indirect argument for the Marcy procedure in adolescents and young men with type I or II hernias. The preeminence of direct recurrences and the existence of direct diverticular suprapubic recurrences are arguments for mesh procedures. The fact that all recurrences are located in the area of myo-pectineal and femoral orifices must be considered for the choice of a mesh procedure.