Clinicopathological evaluation of renal allografts of four patients by 20-year protocol biopsies

Abstract:  Twenty-year protocol biopsies were performed in four cases of renal transplant recipients with grafts that had survived 20 years or more . All four recipients received transplants from their parents, and never had episodes of acute rejection. They were maintained with the conventional immunosuppressive protocol including azathioprine, mizoribine, and prednisolone. Three of them had past history of malignant diseases such as breast cancer and tongue cancer. In spite of fair graft function, the microscopic findings of 20-year protocol biopsy showed various degrees of histological damage; e.g. obsolescence of the glomeruli, glomerulosclerosis, arteriole wall thickening, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. Although two of the four grafts were functioning with low serum creatinine levels (1.3–1.4 mg dL⁻¹) at 24 years and 26 years following transplantation, respectively, the function of the other two grafts had decreased more than 20 years after transplantation. In the two grafts with decreased function, glomerulosclerosis and arteriole wall thickening tended to be more severe (Banff classification of chronic allograft nephropathy [CAN] grade II and III) at the 20-year protocol biopsy compared with the two well-functioning grafts (CAN grade I and II). We conclude that the protocol biopsies even at 20 years can contribute to predict the fate of renal allografts.     

Effect of histological damage on long-term kidney transplant outcome

BACKGROUND: Chronic renal allograft failure remains a major challenge to overcome. Factors such as donor quality, delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection, and immunosuppression are known to affect long-term outcome, but their relationship to histological damage to graft outcome is unclear. METHODS: Protocol kidney biopsies (n=112) obtained at 3 months after transplantation yielded 102 with adequate tissue. Histology was scored by the Banff schema, and compared with implantation biopsies (n=91), repeat 12-month histology (n=39), decline in serum creatinine and serial isotopic glomerular filtration rate, onset of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), and actuarial graft survival censored for death with a functioning graft. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 9.3 years, 20 patients had graft failure and 26 died with a functioning graft. Banff chronic nephropathy was present in 24% of 3-month biopsies, and was predicted by microvascular disease in the donor, cold ischemia, DGF, and acute vascular rejection (P<0.001). Acute glomerulitis at 3 months correlated with segmental glomerulosclerosis at 12 months, subsequent recurrent glomerulonephritis, and graft failure (P<0.01). Subclinical rejection at 3 months occurred in 29% of biopsies, correlated with prior acute rejection and HLA mismatch, and led to chronic histological damage by 12 months (r=0.25-0.67, P<0.05-0.001). Subclinical rejection, arteriolar hyalinosis, and tubulitis present at 3 months had resolved by 12 months. The 10-year survival rates for Banff chronic nephropathy were 90.4% for grade 0, 81.0% grade 1, and 57.9% for grades 2 or greater (P<0.01). Early tubulointerstitial damage at 3 months profoundly influenced graft survival beyond 10 years. CAN was predicted by kidney ischemia, 3-month chronic intimal vascular thickening, tubular injury, proteinuria, and late rejection. Chronic fibrointimal thickening of the small arteries and chronic interstitial fibrosis at 3 months independently predicted graft loss and decline in renal function (P<0.05-0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early transplant damage occurs in the tubulointerstitial compartment from preexisting donor kidney injury and discrete events such as vascular rejection and DGF. Subsequent chronic damage and graft failure reflect accumulated previous injury and chronic interstitial fibrosis, vascular impairment, subclinical rejection, and injury from late rejection. CAN may be conceptualized as the sequelae of incremental and cumulative damage to the transplanted kidney. The duration of graft survival is dependent and predicted by the quality of the transplanted donor kidney combined with the intensity, frequency, and irreversibility of these damaging insults.     

SDF-1 expression is elevated in chronic human renal allograft rejection

The exact mechanism of acute and chronic allograft rejection still remains unclear. The chemokine SDF-1 as mediator of allograft rejection has been under intensive investigation in liver, cardiac and bone marrow transplantation, whereas in renal transplantation, there are no reports about SDF-1 to date. This study was performed to evaluate if SDF-1 might also play an important role in human renal graft biopsies. One hundred and ninety formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded renal allograft biopsies were included in the analysis from patients with normal renal graft morphology (according to Banff 97 classification grade 1, n = 84), with acute interstitial rejection (Banff grade 4 type I, n = 10), with acute vascular rejection (Banff grade 4 type II, n = 21), with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN, Banff grade 5, n = 23), and without rejection but with various other lesions (Banff grade 6, n = 42). SDF-1 was localized by immunohistochemistry. In biopsies with CAN, SDF-1 expression was significantly elevated in interstitial infiltrates and infiltrating neointimal cells of arteries compared with biopsies with normal renal graft morphology. This is the first study describing a role of SDF-1 in human renal allograft rejection. We were able to demonstrate in a large number of biopsies an upregulation of SDF-1 in patients with CAN. Whether SDF-1 has pro-inflammatory or protective properties in this setting has to be evaluated in further trials.     

Histopathologic Clusters Differentiate Subgroups Within the Nonspecific Diagnoses of CAN or CR: Preliminary Data from the DeKAF Study

The nonspecific diagnoses ‘chronic rejection’‘CAN’, or ‘IF/TA’ suggest neither identifiable pathophysiologic mechanisms nor possible treatments. As a first step to developing a more useful taxonomy for causes of new‐onset late kidney allograft dysfunction, we used cluster analysis of individual Banff score components to define subgroups. In this multicenter study, eligibility included being transplanted prior to October 1, 2005, having a ‘baseline’ serum creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dL before January 1, 2006, and subsequently developing deterioration of graft function leading to a biopsy. Mean time from transplant to biopsy was 7.5 ± 6.1 years. Of the 265 biopsies (all with blinded central pathology interpretation), 240 grouped into six large (n > 13) clusters. There were no major differences between clusters in recipient demographics. The actuarial postbiopsy graft survival varied by cluster (p = 0.002). CAN and CNI toxicity were common diagnoses in each cluster (and did not differentiate clusters). Similarly, C4d and presence of donor specific antibody were frequently observed across clusters. We conclude that for recipients with new‐onset late graft dysfunction, cluster analysis of Banff scores distinguishes meaningful subgroups with differing outcomes.     

An evaluation of the Banff classification of early renal allograft biopsies and correlation with outcome.

BACKGROUND: The Banff classification for assessment of renal allograft biopsies was introduced as a standardized international classification of renal allograft pathology and acute rejection. Subsequent debate and evaluation studies have attempted to develop and refine the classification. A recent alternative classification, known as the National Institutes of Health Collaborative Clinical Trials in Transplantation (NIH-CCTT) classification, proposed three distinct types of acute rejection. The 1997 Fourth Banff meeting appeared to move towards a consensus for describing transplant biopsies, which incorporated both approaches. Patients who received a renal allograft at the Oxford Transplant Centre were managed by a combination of protocol and clinically indicated biopsies. We have undertaken a retrospective analysis of the biopsies correlated with the clinical outcome to test the prognostic value of the original Banff (Banff 93-95) and NIH-CCTT classifications. METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-two patients received renal allografts between May 1985 and December 1989, and were immunosuppressed using a standard protocol of cyclosporine, azathioprine and steroid. Adequate 5-year follow-up data were available on 351 patients, and of these, 293 had at least one satisfactory biopsy taken between days 2 and 35 after transplantation, the latter patients forming the study group. The D2-35 biopsies taken from these patients, which were not originally reported according to the Banff classification, were re-examined and classified according to the Banff 93-95 protocols. For each patient the biopsy found to be the most severely abnormal was selected, and the Banff and NIH-CCTT grading compared with the clinical outcome. RESULTS: Seven hundred and forty-three biopsies taken from 293 patients between days 2 and 35 after transplantation were examined and the patients categorized on the basis of the 'worst' Banff grading as follows. Normal or non-rejection, 20%; borderline, 34%; acute rejection grade I (AR I), 18%; AR IIA, 6%; AR IIB, 14%; AR III, 1%; AR IIIC, 3%; widespread necrosis 3%. The clinical outcome for the last two groups combined was very poor with 18% of grafts functioning at 3 months and 6% at 5 years. The other groups with vascular rejection (AR IIB and AR III) had an intermediate outcome, graft survival being 78% at 3 months and 61% at 5 years. The remaining four groups (normal, borderline, cellular AR I and AR IIA) had the best outcome: graft survival 95% at 3 months and 78% at 5 years with virtually no difference between the four groups. Three forms of acute rejection, namely tubulo-interstitial, vascular and transmural vascular, were identified, but only the latter two categories were associated with a poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The eight sub-categories of the Banff classification of renal allograft biopsies are associated with three different prognoses with respect to graft survival in the medium term. These three prognostic groups correspond to the three NIH-CCTT types. The data provide support for the consensus developed at Banff 97 separating tubulo-interstitial, vascular and transmural vascular rejection (types I, II and III acute rejection).     

Cohort study of the prognostic significance of acute transplant glomerulitis in acutely rejecting renal allografts.

BACKGROUND: Acute transplant glomerulitis is a unique lesion in renal allografts, the prognostic significance of which is controversial. We conducted this retrospective cohort study to examine the independent prognostic significance of moderate-to-severe transplant glomerulitis in acute rejection. METHODS: Renal allograft survival for patients with acute rejection were studied, comparing one group with significant glomerulitis (G, n=28) with those with no glomerulitis (NG, n=35). Clinical, biopsy, and demographic data and renal graft survival were compared, and the association of G with graft failure was examined. RESULTS: In the G versus NG group, a greater percentage of patients were highly sensitized (peak panel reactive antibody value >80%; P=0.009), had had a previous renal transplant (40% vs. 11%; P=0.02), or had suffered from delayed graft function (P=0.03). The G group had a trend toward earlier rejection episodes (P=0.07), a significantly higher serum creatinine at the time of index biopsy (P=0.01), a higher prevalence of vascular rejection (P=0.02), and less improvement in mean reciprocal serum creatinine at 1-2 weeks after biopsy (P=0.02). Although there was a trend toward shorter allograft survival in the G group (P=0.09), the level of significance of which increased with adjustment for transplantation time period and the duration of the transplant-biopsy interval (P=0.06), the relative risk for graft loss was no longer significant when additionally adjusted for index biopsy Banff score (relative risk, 0.97; P=0.97). CONCLUSION: In this study, G was significantly more common in highly sensitized patients and was strongly associated with vascular rejection biopsies but was not an independent predictor of graft survival.     

The role of C4d immunostaining in the evaluation of the causes of renal allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Renal biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients. The Banff (1997) classification was revised in 2003 incorporating morphological criteria and C4d immunostaining for the diagnosis of acute antibody-mediated rejection. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of histomorphology and C4d immunostaining in indicated renal allograft biopsies with a clinical follow-up for a minimum duration of 1 year. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Histological analysis and C4d immunostaining were performed on 132 needle core biopsies and 2 nephrectomy specimens from 107 patients from July 2004 to June 2005. RESULTS: Histological analysis revealed 59 cases of acute rejection, 10 biopsies of acute tubular necrosis, 41 cases of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), either alone or in combination with other diseases, and 18 biopsies of normal morphology. There were four cases of BK nephropathy (BK N) and eight cases had miscellaneous diagnoses. C4d immunostaining was performed on 126 biopsies. Overall, the prevalence of C4d positivity was 45% (57 of 126). Fifty-five percent (28 of 51) of the cases of acute rejection showed C4d positivity including 81% of presumptive antibody-mediated rejection (P-AbAR), 20% acute cellular rejection and 58% acute cellular rejection + P-AbAR. Overall C4d positivity was 37% in chronic allograft nephropathy. Acute tubular necrosis and borderline rejection showed 25 and 50% C4d positivity, respectively. Amongst various histological features, capillary margination of polymorphs and dilatation of peritubular capillaries (PTC-D) showed significant association with C4d positivity (P < 0.005). In cases of CAN, transplant glomerulopathy had significant association with C4d positivity. C4d-positive cases had a higher mean value of serum creatinine at the time of biopsies. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that C4d staining is a useful adjunct marker of the humoral limb of rejection, both in early and late post-transplant periods.     

Impact of the Banff '97 classification for histological diagnosis of rejection on clinical outcome and renal function parameters after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Data on a systematic correlation of specific pathomorphologic lesions in renal allograft biopsy specimens with clinical outcome parameters are crucial to determine the relevance of kidney biopsy findings after transplantation for graft prognosis. Specific histologic lesions of the revised Banff '97 classification were correlated with clinical follow-up data. METHODS: The analysis was done on a series of 48 consecutive renal allograft biopsy specimens. Logistic regression was used to compare for response to rejection treatment dependent on histologic grading. Cox regression was applied to analyze the impact of the histologic findings on graft failure during ongoing follow-up. RESULTS: Severity of acute rejection was statistically associated with unresponsiveness to antirejection treatment (odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval 1.13-5.03) and predicted an increased risk of graft failure (hazard ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.48-3.14). Intimal arteritis (hazard ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.40-2.45) was the only determinate of a poor survival prognosis. Mean serum creatinine level and the need for antihypertensive drugs were significantly higher in the Banff I-III graded groups after 1 and 2 years of follow-up, whereas patients with borderline rejection were not significantly different from the control group. CONCLUSION: We confirmed a significant association between the revised Banff '97 classification and graft outcome. Intimal arteritis was the only significant predictor of a poor survival probability. The distinction of borderline rejection and Banff grade I rejection seems to be important from a prognostic point of view.     

Clinical factors associated with graft fibrosis in kidney-transplant recipients on steroid-avoidance immunosuppression

Abstract: Background: Recent studies have documented good patient and graft outcomes and a low risk of acute rejection with steroid‐avoidance immunosuppression in kidney‐transplant recipients, but the risk of progressive graft fibrosis is not well studied. Methods: All adult primary kidney transplant or combined kidney and pancreas transplant recipients on steroid avoidance immunosuppression were eligible for study. All recipients received induction with antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab. Corticosteroids were stopped after day 4 post‐transplantation. Patients were maintained with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Protocol biopsies were done at reperfusion and at one, four, and 12 months after transplantation. Results: Eighty one‐yr protocol biopsies with adequate specimens were obtained from 132 kidney or kidney–pancreas transplant recipients. Fifteen (19%) of the biopsies showed moderate to severe graft interstitial fibrosis (GIF) (Banff ci score ≥2). Recipients with GIF were older, had lower body mass index, greater human lymphocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, older donors, serum creatinine ≥1.6 mg/dL at one month, a Banff ci score >0 on one‐month biopsy, BK nephropathy, and interstitial cellular infiltrates on the one‐yr biopsy. In the unadjusted logistic regression analysis, BK nephropathy, serum creatinine ≥1.6 mg/dL at one month, recipient age, Banff ci score >0 on one‐month biopsy, and donor age were the only variables associated with a higher risk of GIF on the one‐year biopsy. In the multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for these variables, BK nephropathy, serum creatinine ≥1.6 mg/dL at one month after transplantation, and recipient age were independently associated with the risk of GIF on the one‐year biopsy. Conclusion: In this small study of primary kidney or combined kidney–pancreas transplant recipients on steroid‐avoidance immunosuppression, we found that 19% had GIF on a one‐year protocol biopsy. BK nephropathy, serum creatinine ≥1.6 mg/dL one month after transplantation, and recipient age correlated with an increased risk for GIF on the one‐yr biopsy.     

Histopathologic evaluation of pretransplant biopsy as a factor influencing graft function after kidney transplantation: a 1-year observation

INTRODUCTION: Many factors affect long-term results in kidney transplantation including histologic damage as a independent predictor, such as chronic allograft/nephropathy in protocol biopsies and age-dependent lesions. Histopathologic findings correlate with the incidence of delayed graft function, renal function, and allograft survival, allowing a rather precise prediction of graft outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 92 renal thick needle preimplantation and 29 postexplantation biopsies. Biopsies were preserved in 4% formalin and immersed in paraffin. Optimal biopsies contained at least 10 glomeruli and at least 2 cross-sections of arteries. We analyzed tubulitis, intensity of acute tubular necrosis, inflammatory infiltration, glomerulonephritis, arterial hyalinization, arteritis, fibrosis, tubular atrophy, arterial intimal fibrosis, increase of mesangial matrix, and percentage of glomerulosclerosis. During the postoperative course we analyzed patients condition, exigency of postoperative dialysis, urine output, as well as serum concentrations of creatinine, urea, uric acid, and ions. During a 1-year observation period, we analyzed living recipients, graft loss, death with a functioning graft, incidence of nephropathy (CAN), and acute rejection episodes (ARE). RESULTS: We observed a significant correlation between immediate graft function (IGF) and lack of ATN in the pre-0 biopsy. We observed no correlation between renal function and arterial hyalinization and fibrosis, inflammatory infiltration, tubular atrophy. In the postoperative period, we observed a significant correlation between IGF and lack of interstitial fibrosis with significantly lower levels of creatinine, urea, and potassium and higher urine output early after transplantation. IGF and better function of the right kidney was correlated with shorter time to reach a creatinine level of 2 mg%. In the postoperative periods, we also observed a difference between renal function depending on gender. The presence of acute tubular necrosis, arterial fibrosis, lack of inflammatory infiltration in the pre-0 biopsy correlated with worse late renal function. Among explantation biopsies 65.5% showed signs of CAN, and 37.93%, histologic marks of ARE.     

Prevalence and immunohistochemical findings of subclinical kidney allograft rejection and its association with graft outcome

Subclinical acute rejection (SAR) occurs in about 30% of stable renal transplant patients and may be a risk factor for a poor allograft outcome. In the present study, the prevalence and clinical features of subclinical rejection, and the expression of immune activation markers in surveillance graft biopsies were assessed and correlated with late graft outcomes. Protocol biopsies were obtained at 2 and 12 months post-transplant in 32 and 26 patients, respectively, with stable renal function. The Banff 1997 criteria were used for histological diagnosis. Graft function and survival and proteinuria were assessed during the 36 months of follow-up. Immunohistochemical evaluation of cell subpopulations and immunoactivation markers were performed on protocol biopsies. The prevalence of SAR at 2 months and of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) at 12 months in representative biopsies was 55 and 50%, respectively. Patients with SAR presented mononuclear cell infiltration with an increased expression of CD3, CD4, CD68, IL-2R and granzyme B. Kidney graft function was significantly worse in patients with SAR at 2 months who had chronic rejection on biopsy at 12 months, but SAR was not associated with a worse graft function, greater proteinuria or a lower graft survival in 3 yr of follow-up. In conclusion, we found an elevated prevalence of SAR at 2 months after transplantation with an increased expression of activation markers. Although an association of SAR with poor graft outcome was not observed, our results suggest that SAR is an immunologically active process and underscore the importance of protocol biopsies in the surveillance of transplanted kidneys.     

Resistive index and chronic allograft nephropathy evaluated in protocol biopsies as predictors of graft outcome.

INTRODUCTION: The presence of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in protocol biopsies is negatively associated with graft survival. Although recent studies have indicated that the resistive index (RI) is a predictor of graft failure, it does not correlate with CAN in stable grafts. We therefore studied the relationship between RI and CAN and examined the predictive value of both parameters on graft outcome. METHODS: Included were patients transplanted between 1997 and 2002 and who had protocol biopsies and RI determinations. Renal lesions were blindly evaluated according to Banff 97 criteria. Mean glomerular volume, cortical interstitial volume fraction and intimal arterial volume fraction were estimated using a point counting technique. RI was determined before biopsy in at least two different renal locations. The outcome variable was defined as graft failure or a 30% serum creatinine increase between protocol biopsy and last follow-up. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included. RI correlated with recipient age (R = 0.52, P < 0.0001), diastolic blood pressure (R = -0.36, P = 0.0006), pulse pressure index (R = 0.27, P = 0.009) and g-score for histological glomerulitis (rho = 0.30, P = 0.0054), but there were no correlations between RI and chronic Banff scores or any morphometric parameter. The presence of CAN (relative risk, 3.5; 95% confidence interval 1.2-10.2; P = 0.02) but not RI was associated with the outcome variable. CONCLUSION: RI was associated with surrogate measures of vascular compliance such as recipient age and pulse pressure index but not with chronic allograft damage, even when it was evaluated by histomorphometry. Our results indicate that histology may be superior to RI in predicting graft function deterioration, at least in patients with stable renal function.     

Subclinical Rejection Associated with Chronic Allograft Nephropathy in Protocol Biopsies as a Risk Factor for Late Graft Loss

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in protocol biopsies is associated with graft loss while the association between subclinical rejection (SCR) and outcome has yielded contradictory results. We analyze the predictive value of SCR and/or CAN in protocol biopsies on death-censored graft survival. Since 1988, a protocol biopsy was done during the first 6 months in stable grafts with serum creatinine <300 micromol/L and proteinuria <1 g/day. Biopsies were evaluated according to Banff criteria. Borderline changes and acute rejection were grouped as SCR. CAN was defined as presence of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. Mean follow-up was 91 +/- 46 months. Sufficient tissue was obtained in 435 transplants. Biopsies were classified as normal (n = 186), SCR (n = 74), CAN (n = 110) and SCR with CAN (n = 65). Presence of SCR with CAN was associated with old donors, percentage of panel reactive antibodies and presence of acute rejection before protocol biopsy. Cox regression analysis showed that SCR with CAN (relative risk [RR]: 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-3.12; p = 0.02) and hepatitis C virus (RR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.38-3.75; p = 0.01) were independent predictors of graft survival. In protocol biopsies, the detrimental effect of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy on long-term graft survival is modulated by SCR.     

Inflammation in Areas of Tubular Atrophy in Kidney Allograft Biopsies: A Potent Predictor of Allograft Failure

The Banff scoring schema provides a common ground to analyze kidney transplant biopsies. Interstitial inflammation (i) and tubulitis (t) in areas of viable tissue are features in scoring acute rejection, but are excluded in areas of tubular atrophy (TA). We studied inflammation and tubulitis in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients undergoing allograft biopsy for new‐onset late graft dysfunction (N = 337). We found inflammation (‘iatr’) and tubulitis (‘tatr’) in regions of fibrosis and atrophy to be strongly correlated with each other (p < 0.0001). Moreover, iatr was strongly associated with death‐censored graft failure when compared to recipients whose biopsies had no inflammation, even after adjusting for the presence of interstitial fibrosis (Hazard Ratio = 2.31, [1.10–4.83]; p = 0.0262) or TA (hazard ratio = 2.42, [1.16–5.08]; p = 0.191), serum creatinine at the time of biopsy, time to biopsy and i score. Further, these results did not qualitatively change after additional adjustments for C4d staining or donor specific antibody. Stepwise regression identified the most significant markers of graft failure which include iatr score. We propose that a more global assessment of inflammation in kidney allograft biopsies to include inflammation in atrophic areas may provide better prognostic information. Phenotypic characterization of these inflammatory cells and appropriate treatment may ameliorate late allograft failure.     

Baseline glomerular sclerosis influences morphological changes, but not level of serum creatinine

The aim of this study was to investigate whether glomerular sclerosis (GS) at the time of engraftment affects subsequent morphology and clinical course of renal allografts. Eighty-one renal transplant recipients were recruited for this study. Protocol biopsies of the renal allografts were performed at engraftment, as well as at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years after transplantation. All cases were divided into 2 groups based on the presence of GS at engraftment, namely, non-GS and GS groups. Morphological changes in the renal allografts were graded from 0 to 3+ based on the severity of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) of the Banff classification based on 5 factors: percentage of GS, extent of interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, arterial intimal thickening, and arteriolar hyalinosis. Furthermore, the level of serum creatinine (s-Cr) at each year was examined by recipient age and gender, donor age and gender, type of donor (living/cadaver), delayed graft function, acute rejection within 1 year after transplantation, mean blood pressure, and use of calcineurin inhibitors as well as the presence of GS at engraftment. The extent of GS at engraftment significantly correlated with donor age (P = .0038) but with a weak correlation coefficient. Although the severity of CAN developed gradually in both non-GS and GS groups, differences in morphological changes at engraftment between the 2 groups persisted throughout 7 years. Donor age and recipient gender influenced s-Cr significantly. In conclusion, the presence of GS at engraftment aggravates subsequent morphological changes and affects short-term but not long-term allograft prognosis.     

C4D deposition and positive posttransplant crossmatch are not necessarily markers of antibody-mediated rejection in renal allograft recipients

The aim of the study was to search for serologic, immunopathologic, and morphologic evidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) among patients with acute renal allograft dysfunction. The study included 19 patients with episodes of acute rejection (ARE) within the first year after transplantation. All patients had negative crossmatch tests before transplantation. Patients underwent biopsy for histologic and C4d examinations. All patients were monitored for donor-specific HLA alloantibodies during the first posttransplant year. Complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatches were performed with donor lymphocytes. In eight patients, the crossmatch test results changed to positive during ARE. In all biopsies except one with cortical infarction, we observed C4d staining (group 1). The biopsies of four patients showed histologic changes of AMR, and all of their grafts were lost. In one patient, cellular and vascular rejection (Banff II) were present; in two, Banff I; and in one, borderline lesions. These results were compared with 11 patients with ARE but negative posttransplant crossmatches and negative staining for C4d (group 2). The histologic findings in the biopsies of these patients were cellular interstitial and vascular rejection (Banff I and Banff II). With no features suggestive of AMR. During the first year after transplantation, the creatinine levels of group 1 patients, were significantly higher than group 2 patients. One-year graft survival was 50% in group 1 and 91% in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: C4d and a positive posttransplant crossmatch were not associated with histologic features of AMR in half of the ARE. Nevertheless, C4d deposition and positive posttransplant crossmatches correlated with allograft injury among renal transplant patients.     

Renal allograft glomerulopathy and the value of immunohistochemistry

Studies of late renal allograft biopsies focus on chronic damage investigated by light microscopy (LM). We evaluated the use of immunohistochemistry (IH) as applied in the routine study of transplant glomerulopathies. Among renal transplants in 1985 - 1997, 129 were identified where a graft biopsy had been obtained 6 months or more after transplantation, studied by LM and IH and the original renal disease was known. IH results were evaluated in relation to glomerular LM findings and the original diagnosis. The risk of graft loss in relation to recurrent and de novo glomerulopathy was evaluated. By LM, 69 biopsies (53%) showed glomerulopathy, mesangial sclerosis only in 26, proliferative changes in 15, membranous in 15 and combined membranous and proliferative in 13. By IH, 46 biopsies (36%) stained positive with IgM and/or complement only and 24 with immune complexes including IgA and/or IgG. Seven biopsies (5.4%) showed glomerular disease by IH in spite of normal LM. Recurrence was diagnosed in 22 grafts; 12 had IgA nephropathy, 3 had SLE, 6 other immune complex nephritides and 1 systemic vasculitis. Twenty-eight biopsies (22%) with proliferative and/or membranous glomerulopathy lacked clear connection to the original renal disorder. More than half of these had deposits of IgM and C3 only. The further graft survival was significantly reduced in the presence of de novo glomerulopathy by LM, relative risk 2.0 (confidence interval 1.1 - 3.8) in a Cox-proportional hazards analysis also including serum creatinine and Banff chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) grade, p = 0.03. In conclusion, transplant glomerulopathy should be separated from recurrence. De novo glomerulopathy is frequent and ominous.     

Acute rejection-associated tubular basement membrane defects and chronic allograft nephropathy

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection is a major risk factor for chronic allograft nephropathy, although the link(s) between these events is not understood. The hypothesis of this study is that alterations in tubular basement membranes (TBMs) that occur during acute rejection may be irreversible and thereby play a role in the development of chronic allograft nephropathy. METHODS: Fourteen renal transplant patients were selected, each having had two or more biopsies performed (42 total). All biopsies were scored for acute and chronic rejection using Banff 1997 criteria. The initial biopsy showed only acute interstitial rejection (type I rejection). No biopsies contained significant chronic arterial lesions of chronic vascular rejection. The entire cortex was examined on Jones methenamine silver-stained sections at x400 for interruption in TBM staining. The number of tubules with TBM abnormalities was counted, and the renal cortical area was measured by image analysis. Periodic acid-Schiff/immunoperoxidase stain was performed on 12 acute rejection biopsies stained for laminin, cytokeratin 7, CD3, CD20, and CD68. Controls consisted of 11 biopsies (8 negative for rejection and 3 acute tubular necrosis). RESULTS: Numerous TBM alterations in silver staining were identified as being associated with acute rejection and tubulitis, consisting of abrupt TBM discontinuities and/or extreme attenuation with segmental or complete absence of TBM. A loss of TBM matrix proteins was confirmed by absent laminin staining in areas of acute rejection and tubulitis. There was herniation of tubular cells into the interstitium through TBM defects confirmed by cytokeratin staining. The TBM defects were spatially associated with inflammatory cells, particularly macrophages. When the biopsies were divided into two groups, <10 and> 10 TBM breaks/mm2, there were statistically significant morphologic and clinical correlations. The number of TBM disruptions correlated with the serum creatinine at the time of biopsy, a combined Banff t + i score, the difference in tubular atrophy between the initial and most recent biopsy and the difference between the nadir creatinine and most recent creatinine. CONCLUSION: Damage to TBM develops in acute rejection as a consequence of interstitial inflammation and tubulitis. These lytic events correlate with the later development of clinical and morphologic evidence of chronic injury in the absence of arterial injury of chronic rejection. We suggest that chronic allograft nephropathy may have an inflammatory interstitial origin.     

Impact of banff borderline acute rejection among renal allograft recipients

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of Banff borderline acute rejection (AR) among renal transplant recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the courses of adult kidney transplant recipients with borderline AR on clinically indicated biopsies performed at our center from January 2003 to July 2006. Patients with complete transplant records and serum creatinine values at 6 and 12 months were included in this study. The primary outcome measures were serum creatinine values at 1 to 2 weeks after treatment, and at 6 and 12 months after graft biopsy. RESULTS: Among 428 renal graft biopsies, borderline AR was observed in 100 cases (23%). Patients were maintained on the same immunosuppression. The 86 who had complete data were included in the study. Seventy-eight percent of the patients received treatment with 3 days of methylprednisolone, while 22% were untreated. Mean serum creatinine values in the treated group were 2.9 +/- 1.0, 2.6 +/- 2.5, and 3.0 +/- 2.9 mg/dL at the time of biopsy, and at 6 and 12 months thereafter, respectively. In the untreated group, mean serum creatinine values were 2.2 +/- 1.0, 1.9 +/- 0.8, and 2.3 +/- 1.2 mg/dL during biopsy, and at 6 and 12 months thereafter, respectively. There was no significant difference in the serum creatinine at any of the measured time points between the 2 groups. Twelve patients had repeat renal graft biopsies which showed AR (6%), chronic allograft nephropathy (2.4%), and borderline changes (3.8%). Nine of the patients in the treated group eventually developed graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with borderline AR showed a progressive increase in serum creatinine over time. They should be followed closely; immunosuppression may need to be intensified.     

Safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal two days after kidney transplantation: analysis of results at three years

BACKGROUND: Chronic steroid therapy in spite of myriad side effects is widely used in kidney transplantation. This prospective controlled study evaluated safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal at 2 days in kidney recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy. METHODS: In all, 300 kidney recipients were studied; 150 in second-day steroid withdrawal group and 150 in steroid treated group (control group). Immunosuppression was basiliximab induction and maintenance was a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was treated by methylpredisolone. Surveillance biopsies were completed to evaluate subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Primary end point was acute rejection. Three-year patient and graft survival, new onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were evaluated. RESULTS: Acute rejection was diagnosed in 14% in control group and 16% in steroid withdrawal group. Three-year patient and graft survival was 89% and 79% in control and 91% and 78% in steroid withdrawal group. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance was 1.9+/-0.8 and 59+/-11 in control group and 1.8+/-0.9 mg/dl and 61+/-10 mls/minute in steroid withdrawal group. Incidence of SCAR and progression of CAN were comparable in the 2 groups. At 3-years NODM was diagnosed in 21% in control group and 4% in steroid withdrawal group (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Two-day steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients did not affect BPAR, SCAR, CAN, graft function and patient and graft survival compared to control group up to 3 years. NODM was significantly less in steroid withdrawal group. Two-day steroid withdrawal is safe and beneficial in kidney transplant recipients.