Effect of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol therapy on seasonal changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide levels in patients with pollen-induced asthma.

BACKGROUND: There has been concern that in allergic asthmatic patients there might be an interactive effect on inflammation between regular salmeterol use and exposure to allergens, resulting in increased airway responsiveness. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of salmeterol on allergen-induced changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) levels in allergic asthmatic patients concomitantly taking inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: Forty-two asthmatic patients sensitized to pollen allergens were randomly allocated to treatment with fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (n=21) or fluticasone propionate alone (n=21). Spirometry, the methacholine provocation concentration causing a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC20), the adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) PC20, and ENO levels were measured before and at the height of the pollen season after 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Changes in the methacholine PC20, the AMP PC20, and ENO levels were not significantly different between treatment groups. No significant changes in the AMP PC20 were observed among the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol and fluticasone propionate groups during natural pollen exposure. However, a significant increase in the methacholine PC20 was observed in the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol group (P = .03) and in the fluticasone propionate group (P = .04); ENO concentrations decreased significantly in both groups during natural allergen exposure (P = .009 and .005). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pollen-induced asthma, treatment with either fluticasone propionate or fluticasone propionate-salmeterol is associated with significant reductions in methacholine responsiveness and ENO concentrations, even during natural pollen exposure. Furthermore, at least in patients with mild asthma, natural allergen exposure and the regular use of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol are not associated with a greater increase in ENO levels and airway responsiveness than natural allergen exposure and fluticasone propionate use alone.     

Dissimilarity between seasonal changes in airway responsiveness to adenosine-5'-monophosphate and methacholine in patients with grass pollen allergic rhinitis: relation to induced sputum

BACKGROUND: In patients with allergic rhinitis, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation may increase during pollen exposure. BHR can be assessed by adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP) or methacholine challenge. It has been suggested that BHR to AMP is more closely related to airway inflammation than BHR to methacholine. Seasonal allergic rhinitis offers a dynamic model to study changes in BHR and airway inflammation during natural allergen exposure. METHODS: We measured BHR [provocative concentration causing a 20% fall (PC(20)) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1))] to AMP and methacholine, and induced sputum cells in 16 rhinitis patients before and during the 2001 grass pollen season. RESULTS: There was a decrease in PC(20) methacholine during pollen exposure (geometric mean PC(20) from 3.22 to 1.73 mg/ml, p = 0.0023), whereas no reduction was observed for PC(20) AMP (p = 0.11). There was no increase in sputum eosinophils [pre: 0.69% (95% confidence interval 0.22-2.07); during: 1.85 (0.55- 5.6), p = 0.31]. Although the correlation of log PC(20) methacholine and log PC(20) AMP at baseline was good (r = 0.76, p = 0.001), individual seasonal changes (doubling concentrations) in PC(20) methacholine were not correlated with changes in PC(20) AMP (rho = 0.21, p = 0.44). There was no correlation between baseline log PC(20) methacholine or seasonal changes in PC(20) methacholine and sputum eosinophils (p > 0.12, all correlations). In contrast, there was a significant correlation between seasonal changes in PC(20) AMP and changes in sputum eosinophils (rho = -0.59, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: These data show dissimilarity between seasonal changes in PC(20) AMP and methacholine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Moreover, PC(20) AMP seems to be more closely related to sputum eosinophils than PC(20) methacholine. The clinical significance of this discrepancy is unclear.     

Comparison of deltaFVC between patients with allergic rhinitis with airway hypersensitivity and patients with mild asthma.

BACKGROUND: In asthmatic individuals, airway sensitivity and maximal airway response are increased. Airway sensitivity is usually evaluated by measuring the provocation concentration of inhaled methacholine or histamine that causes a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% (PC20). The percentage decrease in forced vital capacity at the PC20 (deltaFVC) has been proposed as a surrogate marker for maximal airway response. Individuals with allergic rhinitis and no clinical evidence of asthma frequently exhibit airway hypersensitivity. OBJECTIVE: To compare the deltaFVC between patients with allergic rhinitis and mild asthmatic patients with a similar degree of airway hypersensitivity. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of methacholine challenge test data from 72 children with allergic rhinitis and airway hypersensitivity (methacholine PC20 < 16 mg/mL) (rhinitis group) and from 72 children with mild atopic asthma matched to the rhinitis group regarding the methacholine PC20 (asthma group). The deltaFVC was calculated on the concentration-response curve to methacholine. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD deltaFVC was significantly lower in the rhinitis group (15.0% +/- 3.6%) vs the asthma group (17.4% +/- 5.3%) (P = .002). There was no significant correlation between the deltaFVC and PC20 in the rhinitis (r = -0.101; P = .41) and asthma (r = -0.023; P = .85) groups when 2 patients with PC20 less than 1 mg/mL were excluded from each group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with allergic rhinitis and airway hypersensitivity had a significantly lower deltaFVC than methacholine PC20-matched mild asthmatic patients, suggesting that the level of maximal airway response in patients with allergic rhinitis is lower than that in mild asthmatic patients with a similar degree of airway hypersensitivity.     

The importance of maximal airway response to methacholine in the prediction of asthma development in patients with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is a known predictor and correlate of asthma incidence. However, it is not clear which patients with allergic rhinitis are at greater risk of the development of asthma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether airway hypersensitivity and/or increased maximal response on the dose-response curve to methacholine would predict the development of asthma in subjects with allergic rhinitis. METHODS: One hundred and forty-one children with allergic rhinitis were prospectively studied for 7 years. At the initiation of the study, bronchial provocation test with methacholine using a stepwise increasing concentration technique was performed to measure PC(20) (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1)) and maximal response. Each subject was evaluated at least every 6 months and details of asthmatic symptoms or signs experienced during the intervening period were taken. RESULTS: Twenty of 122 subjects available for the follow-up developed asthma. Nine (19.6%) of 46 hypersensitive (PC(20) < 18 mg/mL) subjects developed asthma, compared with 11 (14.5%) of 76 normosensitive subjects (P = 0.462). Eight (32%) of 25 subjects without maximal response plateau developed asthma, compared with 12 (12.4%) of 97 subjects with maximal response plateau (P = 0.018). Score test for trend revealed a significant association between the level of maximal response (P = 0.007), but not the degree of methacholine PC(20) (P = 0.123), and the future development of asthma. CONCLUSION: An increased maximal airway response to methacholine is shown to be a better predictor for the future development of asthma in patients with allergic rhinitis, than airway hypersensitivity to methacholine.     

Relationship between nasal and bronchial responsiveness in perennial allergic rhinitic patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: The nasal and bronchial mucosa present similarities and most patients with asthma also have rhinitis, suggesting the concept of 'one airway one disease'. Although many studies may suggest the relationship between nasal and bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, few studies have been published which address this question directly. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the relationship between nonspecific nasal and bronchial responsiveness exists in perennial allergic rhinitic patients with asthma. METHODS: Fifty-one perennial allergic rhinitic patients with the definitive or suspected asthma underwent methacholine bronchial provocation tests and nasal histamine challenge tests. A slope of the absolute changes in nasal symptoms score/log concentrations of histamine was calculated by linear regression analysis. A ratio of the final absolute change in nasal symptoms score to the sum of all the doses of histamine given to the subject was also calculated. The degree of bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was categorized as positive bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) if PC(20) (provocative concentration of methacholine resulting in 20% fall in FEV(1)) was <4 mg/ml, borderline BHR if PC(20) was >or=4 but 16 mg/ml. Another index of bronchial responsiveness (BRindex) was calculated as the log [(% decline in FEV(1)/log final methacholine concentration as mg/dl) + 10]. RESULTS: The geometric means of the slope (4.47 vs. 2.95, p < 0.05) and the ratio (1.68 vs. 0.54, p < 0.01) were higher in patients with positive BHR (n = 23) than in patients with negative BHR (n = 19), respectively. The geometric means of the slope (3.50) and the ratio (1.13) in patients with borderline BHR (n = 9) were between the two groups, respectively. In all patients, the log-slope (r = 0.48, p < 0.001) and the log-ratio (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) were correlated well with the BRindex, respectively. Even in allergic rhinitic patients with definitive asthma, the log-slope was correlated with the BRindex (r = 0.39, p < 0.05) or log-PC(20) (r = -0.36, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The nonspecific nasal responsiveness may be related to the nonspecific bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, which may support the viewpoint that allergic rhinitis and asthma represent a continuum of inflammation involving one common airway.     

Exhaled nitric oxide levels and airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in subjects with nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND:It is widely appreciated that asthma is an inflammatory disease of the airways associated with airway hyperresponsiveness, and that nasal polyposis and asthma are related diseases. The objective of this study was to determine differences in exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) levels and airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) between nonasthmatic patients with nasal polyposis and healthy controls. METHODS: Twenty patients without asthma with nasal polyposis and 16 healthy control subjects were enrolled in the study. Participants were challenged with increasing concentrations of AMP and methacholine. ENO was measured with the single-exhalation method. RESULTS: Bronchoconstriction in response to AMP was detected in 7 (35%) subjects with nasal polyposis. The geometric mean (95% CI) of ENO for subjects with nasal polyposis was 33.1 parts per billion (ppb) (24.0-45.7 ppb) compared with 12.3 ppb (8.5-18.2 ppb) for the healthy controls (p = 0.0002). ENO values were significantly higher in atopic than in nonatopic subjects with nasal polyposis [51.3 ppb (32.3-83.2 ppb) vs. 24.5 ppb (16.2-37.1 ppb), p = 0.02]. Nonatopic subjects with nasal polyposis also had higher concentrations of ENO than healthy control subjects (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled AMP causes airway narrowing in a significantly higher proportion of nonasthmatic subjects with nasal polyposis than in healthy controls. Furthermore, increased concentrations of ENO are detected in atopic and nonatopic subjects with nasal polyposis. These results suggest that bronchial inflammation is present in nonasthmatic subjects with nasal polyposis.     

Nasal beclomethasone prevents the seasonal increase in bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.

Experimental studies have demonstrated that induction of a nasal allergic reaction can lead to an increase in bronchial responsiveness (BR). To assess the clinical relevance of these experimental changes to chronic asthma, we sought to determine the effect of nasal beclomethasone dipropionate (Bdp) on BR in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma. Eighteen subjects with histories of seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma during the fall pollen season with positive skin tests to short ragweed and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to inhaled methacholine were assigned to receive either nasal Bdp (336 micrograms/day) or placebo for the entire ragweed season. Patients recorded daily nasal and chest symptoms, nasal blockage index, oral peak expiratory flow rates, and supplemental medication use. BR to methacholine was measured during the baseline period and 6 weeks into the ragweed season. Although the Bdp group did have a significant improvement in nasal blockage index, there was no improvement in daily asthma symptom scores, oral peak expiratory flow, or asthma medication use. However, subjects treated with Bdp were protected from the increase in BR seen in the placebo group (geometric mean PC20 placebo group: baseline = 0.70, week 6 = 0.29; Bdp group: baseline = 0.80, week 6 = 0.93; intergroup difference, p = 0.022). We conclude that nasal corticosteroid therapy can prevent the increase in BR associated with seasonal pollen exposure in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.     

Airway inflammation in asthma and perennial allergic rhinitis. Relationship with nonspecific bronchial responsiveness and maximal airway narrowing

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic airway inflammation is the hallmark of asthma, but it has also been reported in other conditions such as allergic rhinitis. We have tested whether the analysis of cells and chemicals in sputum can distinguish between patients with mild allergic asthma, those with allergic rhinitis, and healthy controls. The relationship between inflammation markers in sputum and nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (BHR) (PD20 and maximal response plateau [MRP] values) was also evaluated. METHODS: We selected 31 mild asthmatics and 15 rhinitis patients sensitized to house-dust mite. As a control group, we studied 10 healthy subjects. Every subject underwent the methacholine bronchial provocation test (M-BPT) and sputum induction. Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were measured. Sputum cell differentials were assessed, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, albumin, and interleukin (IL)-5 levels were measured in the entire sputum supernatant. RESULTS: Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were higher in asthma patients and rhinitis than in healthy controls, but no difference between asthma patients and rhinitis patients was found. Asthmatics had higher eosinophil counts and higher ECP and tryptase levels in sputum than rhinitis patients or control subjects. Sputum albumin levels were higher in asthmatics than in controls. Rhinitis patients exhibited higher sputum eosinophils than healthy controls. An association between sputum eosinophil numbers and MPR values (r= -0.57) was detected, and a trend toward correlation between sputum ECP levels and PD20 values (r= -0.47) was found in the rhinitis group, but not in asthmatics. No correlation between blood eosinophilic inflammation and lung functional indices was found. CONCLUSIONS: Induced sputum is an accurate method to study bronchial inflammation, allowing one to distinguish between rhinitis patients and mildly asthmatic patients. The fact that no relationship was detected between sputum inflammation and BHR suggests that other factors, such as airway remodeling, may be at least partly responsible for BHR in asthma.     

Effect of omalizumab on adenosine 5'-monophosphate responsiveness in subjects with allergic asthma

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of omalizumab on bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP). METHODS: Thirty-four subjects with mild to moderate allergic asthma were randomized to receive placebo (n = 16) or omalizumab (n = 18) subcutaneously during 12 weeks. Airway responsiveness to AMP was measured at baseline and after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment, whereas the response to methacholine was measured at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment, the increase in AMP PC(20) (provocative concentration required to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1)) was significantly greater in the omalizumab group than in the placebo group, the mean difference in the change between the groups being 1.52 doubling concentrations (95% CI, 0.25-2.79, p = 0.02). Compared with baseline, the mean AMP PC(20) values at 12 weeks were increased by 1.91 doubling concentrations with omalizumab (p < 0.001) and 1.01 doubling concentrations with placebo (p = 0.16), but changes were not significantly different between the treatment groups. Changes in methacholine PC(20) values were not significantly different between the omalizumab and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with allergic asthma, omalizumab reduces the response to AMP without decreasing the response to methacholine. These findings are consistent with the conclusion that the contribution of IgE to the development of AMP bronchoconstriction is more important than their role in the induction of methacholine hyperresponsiveness.     

Changes in airway inflammation following nasal allergic challenge in patients with seasonal rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Seasonal allergic rhinitis could predispose to the development of chronic bronchial inflammation as observed in asthma. However, direct links between nasal inflammation, bronchial inflammation and airway responsiveness in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and without asthma are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to analyse the changes induced by allergic nasal challenge outside the pollen season in airway responsiveness and bronchial inflammation of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Nine patients were evaluated after either grass pollens or placebo nasal challenge in a randomized cross-over double-blinded trial. Nasal parameters were recorded hourly and airway responsiveness was assessed by methacholine challenge. Cytological examinations and cytokine measurements were performed in nasal lavage and induced sputum. Eosinophil activation was investigated by eosinophil-cationic protein expression and secretion. RESULTS: Airway responsiveness was increased after allergic nasal challenge. Total eosinophils and eosinophils expressing eosinophil-cationic protein were increased in induced sputum after allergic nasal challenge. Both eosinophil number and eosinophil-cationic protein concentration in induced sputum were correlated to methacholine responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that eosinophils participate to the bronchial inflammation in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis following allergic nasal challenge outside the pollen season and might explain changes in airway responsiveness.     

The methodological aspects of nasal and exhaled nitric oxide levels in adult Japanese asthmatics

Background: Because both allergic rhinitis and asthma are caused by eosinophilic airway inflammation, using the same method to measure the eosinophilic inflammation of both the upper and lower airway would be advantageous. The levels of nitric oxide in exhaled air (FeNO) and nasal air (nNO) are useful as noninvasive markers of eosinophilic airway inflammation. Although the off-line method of measuring these parameters is easier and more useful than the on-line method, studies using the off-line method are rare in Japan. Methods: In Study 1, we measured the levels of nNO and FeNO in 9 healthy controls and 9 subjects with allergic rhinitis, to validate the methodology for using the off-line method to measure nNO. In Study 2, we measured the nNO and FeNO levels of and performed spirometry on 69 stable asthmatics treated with inhaled corticosteroid. Results: In Study 1, nNO levels were significantly increased in patients with allergic rhinitis compared with healthy subjects (31.0 [20.8 to 41.2] versus 7.4 [0.0 to 14.8] ppb {median [95% confidence interval]}, p=0.018). The 69 patients with asthma that comprised the study population in Study 2 were classified as asthmatics with rhinitis (treatment-na?ve, n=14; treated with antiallergic drugs, n=11; treated with intranasal corticosteroid, n=19) and asthmatics without rhinitis (n=15). Although FeNO did not differ among groups, nNO was significantly increased in treatment-na?ve asthmatics with rhinitis compared with patients with asthma only (26.5 [17.1 to 35.9] versus 8.0 [-1.1 to 17.1] ppb, p=0.033). Conclusion: nNO levels measured by the off-line method are useful markers of allergic rhinitis.     

Monitoring of seasonal variability in bronchial hyper-responsiveness and sputum cell counts in non-asthmatic subjects with rhinitis and effect of specific immunotherapy

Bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) is documented in a proportion of non-asthmatic individuals with allergic rhinitis (NAAR) and reflects inflammatory events in the lower airways. Natural exposure to allergens is known to modulate BHR and the level of airway inflammation in asthma, but less consistently in NAAR. Specific immunotherapy (SIT) attenuates symptoms possibly by reducing BHR and airway inflammation. The influence of natural exposure to Parietaria pollen on BHR and sputum cell counts of NAAR was investigated and the effect of Parietaria SIT examined. Thirty NAAR, monosensitized to Parietaria judaica, participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of the effects of a Parietaria pollen vaccine on symptoms/medication score, BHR to inhaled methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP), and cell counts in the sputum collected out of and during the pollen seasons for 36 months. Seasonal variation in BHR to inhaled methacholine and AMP and changes in sputum cell counts were documented. Changes were consistent for AMP, but not methacholine, and invariably associated with modifications in sputum eosinophils and epithelial cells. The clinical efficacy of Parietaria SIT was associated with a decline in the seasonal deterioration of BHR to AMP, whereas no significant effect was observed on BHR to methacholine or sputum cell differentials. Between-groups comparison of the seasonal changes in PC15 methacholine values and sputum cell differentials calculated as the AUC were not statistically significant, whereas a significant difference in PC15 AMP was demonstrated throughout the study (P=0.029), the median (inter-quartile range) AUC values being 2478.5 (1153.3-3600.0) and 1545.5 (755.3-1797.9) for the SIT- and placebo-treated group, respectively. Bronchial airways of NAAR exhibit features of active inflammation that deteriorate during natural allergen exposure, particularly with regard to BHR to AMP. The clinical efficacy of Parietaria SIT was exclusively associated with attenuation in seasonal worsening of PC15 AMP, suggesting that AMP may be useful in monitoring changes in allergic inflammation of the airways.     

Eosinophilic inflammation, remodeling of lower airway, bronchial responsiveness and cough reflex sensitivity in non-asthmatic subjects with nasal allergy

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that nasal allergy influences the lower airway inflammation and functions. We elucidated whether nasal allergy would contribute to lower airway inflammation and functions. METHODS: 266 subjects aged 21-39 years were interviewed with special emphasis on history of asthma and nasal allergies (perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) and seasonal allergic rhinitis (Japanese cedar pollinosis; PO)). Symptomatic subject was defined when nasal symptoms were present during a 3-week study period. Pulmonary function, provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (PC20), capsaicin cough threshold defined as capsaicin concentration eliciting 5 or more coughs (C5) and eosinophil percentage in hypertonic saline-induced sputum were measured. RESULTS: Based on the interview, 232 subjects without asthma were divided into symptomatic (n = 25) and asymptomatic (n = 22) PAR, PO on-season (n = 15) and off-season (n = 36), and non-nasal allergy subjects (control) (n = 134). Sputum eosinophils were significantly greater in symptomatic PAR than another four groups (p < 0.01). FEV1/FVC ratio was significantly lower in PAR than control (p < 0.05). Maximum mean expiratory flow was lower in PAR than control (asymptomatic: p < 0.05, symptomatic: p = 0.06). C5 was not different among groups. PAR tended to have a lower PC20 compared to control (symptomatic: p = 0.078; asymptomatic: p = 0.086). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that eosinophilic inflammation occurred in symptomatic period of PAR may contribute to development of lower airway remodeling and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Reversely, PO may not be associated with lower airway eosinophilic inflammation or abnormal bronchial functions. Nasal allergy dose not influence the cough reflex sensitivity.     

Airway responsiveness to acetaldehyde in patients with asthma: relationship to methacholine responsiveness and peak expiratory flow variation

BACKGROUND: Although airway hyperresponsiveness to inhaled acetaldehyde has been documented in Japanese patients with asthma, the response to this bronchoconstrictor agent has never been studied in Caucasians. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to determine differences in airway responsiveness to acetaldehyde between asthmatic and healthy subjects, and to examine the relationship between acetaldehyde responsiveness and the variability of peak expiratory flow (PEF). METHODS: The response to methacholine and acetaldehyde challenges was measured in 81 non-smoking adults (61 asthmatics and 20 normal controls). Subjects recorded PEF morning and evening for 14 days. The response to both bronchoconstrictor agents was measured by the PC20 (provocative concentration required to produce a 20% fall in FEV1). PEF variation was expressed as amplitude percentage mean, and as low percentage best (lowest PEF expressed as a percentage of the best PEF recorded). RESULTS: The two types of challenge yielded a similarly high level of sensitivity (100% for methacholine and 92% for acetaldehyde) and specificity (90 and 100%, respectively) to distinguish between asthma and controls. Asthmatic subjects were on average 265-fold less sensitive to acetaldehyde than to methacholine. PC20 acetaldehyde correlated weakly but significantly with both indices of PEF variation (amplitude percentage mean: rho = - 0.36, P = 0. 004; low percentage best: rho = 0.42, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that airway hyperresponsiveness to acetaldehyde is a sensitive and specific indicator for separating asthmatic and normal subjects. Airway responsiveness to methacholine or acetaldehyde and PEF variation are not reflecting the same pathophysiological process in the airways.     

Bronchial responsiveness increases after seasonal antigen exposure in non-asthmatic subjects with pollen-induced rhinitis

This study looked at the effects of natural antigenic exposure on non-specific airway responsiveness (NSAR) in pollen-sensitized non-asthmatic subjects with seasonal rhinitis. Eight subjects had daily recordings of their respiratory symptoms and peak flow rates during and out of the pollen season. Airway response to methacholine was measured at 1-week to 2-week intervals. Pre-season spirometry and NSAR were normal in all subjects. Their PC20 methacholine ranged from 64 to greater than 256 mg/mL. During natural pollen exposure, all subjects had symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis. The only chest symptom observed was coughing. No significant change in peak flow rates was observed throughout the study. A significant increase in bronchial responsiveness to methacholine occurred in five subjects although it did not reach the asthmatic range (less than 16 mg/mL). This change in NSAR was reproduced after antigen (tree pollen) challenge in the laboratory in one of the subjects. A significant increase in blood eosinophils was observed during seasonal pollen exposure. This study shows that following natural antigenic exposure, NSAR can increase in non-asthmatic subjects with allergic rhinitis, although it may not reach the "hyperresponsive range," and is associated with the development of a cough. These data suggest that natural exposure in non-asthmatic atopics may induce an inflammatory reaction in the airways to a degree that may increase NSAR.     

A comparison of exhaled nitric oxide and induced sputum as markers of airway inflammation

BACKGROUND: Exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) has been proposed as a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation in asthma. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the relationships among ENO, eosinophilic airway inflammation as measured by induced sputum, and physiologic parameters of disease severity (spirometry and methacholine PC(20)). We also examined the effect of corticosteroid treatment and atopy on ENO levels and eosinophil counts in induced sputum. METHODS: Measurements were taken on one day in 22 healthy nonatopic subjects, 28 healthy atopic subjects, 38 asthmatic subjects not taking inhaled steroids, 35 asthmatic subjects taking inhaled steroids, and 8 subjects with eosinophilic bronchitis without asthma. RESULTS: ENO levels showed significant but weak correlations with eosinophil differential counts in the steroid-naive asthmatic and healthy atopic groups (r (s) < 0.05). ENO levels were significantly lower in the asthmatic subjects taking steroids compared with the asthmatic subjects not taking steroids, despite there being no difference in the sputum cell counts, and a tendency to increased airflow limitation. ENO levels and sputum eosinophil counts were equally good at differentiating from steroid-naive asthmatic subjects. ENO levels were consistently raised in subjects with eosinophilic bronchitis without asthma. Atopy had no effect on ENO levels in the healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ENO is likely to have limited utility as a surrogate clinical measurement for either the presence or severity of eosinophilic airway inflammation, except in steroid-naive subjects.     

Seasonal variation of airway function in allergic rhinitis

We set out to examine seasonal variation in airway bronchoconstriction in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Airway conductance and response to methacholine challenge were measured during pollen season, as well as in winter when pollen exposure was not present. Airway conductance and spirometry were performed on 17 subjects during allergy season and in winter. In eight of these subjects the measurements were repeated in the successive allergy season. Methacholine bronchoprovocation was performed on 17 of the subjects in winter and in eight subjects in allergy season. We found airway constriction in both allergy seasons as evidenced by specific airway conductance (SGaw) of 0.188 +/- 0.06 and 0.203 +/- 0.03. In contrast, SGaw during winter was 0.27 +/- 0.11. When winter and summer seasons were compared, both summer SGaw values were significantly lower than winter SGaw, p less than 0.01 and p less than 0.05, respectively. Mean airway sensitivity to methacholine during allergy season was 16.1 breath units and not different than out of season 11.7 breath units; p = NS. The reactivity to methacholine (slope of the dose-response curve) and spirometry (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC) in and out of allergy season were likewise not different. The data indicate that patients with allergic rhinitis have unique physiologic behavior separating them from patients with asthma or normal subjects. They develop seasonal bronchoconstriction unassociated with clinical bronchospasm, but this seasonal bronchoconstriction does not potentiate their sensitivity to methacholine. However, they have increased airway sensitivity to methacholine, and this feature distinguishes them from normal subjects.     

Effect of immunotherapy on asthma progression, BHR and sputum eosinophils in allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation are frequently associated with allergic rhinitis, and may be important risk factors for the development of asthma. Specific immunotherapy (SIT) reduces symptom in subjects with allergic rhinitis, but the mechanisms are not clear. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To assess the effect of Parietaria-SIT on asthma progression, rhinitic symptoms, BHR, and eosinophilic inflammation. METHODS: Nonasthmatic subjects with seasonal rhinitis were randomly assigned to receive Parietaria pollen vaccine (n = 15) or matched placebo (n = 15). Data on symptoms and medication score, BHR to methacholine, eosinophilia in sputum were collected throughout the 3-year study. RESULTS: By the end of the study, in the placebo group, symptoms and medication scores significantly increased by a median (interquartile range) of 121% (15-280) and 263% (0-4400) respectively (P < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in the SIT group. We found no significant changes in sputum eosinophils and BHR to methacholine in both groups throughout the study. Nine of 29 participants developed asthma symptoms during the study; of these, only two subjects (14%) in the SIT-treated group (P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Parietaria-SIT reduces symptom and rescue medication scores, but no changes in BHR to methacholine or sputum eosinophilia were observed. Moreover, Parietaria-SIT appears to prevent the natural progression of allergic rhinitis to asthma, suggesting that SIT should be considered earlier in the management of subjects with allergic rhinitis.     

The link between allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma: a prospective population-based study. The Copenhagen Allergy Study

BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesized that allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma are manifestations of the same disease entity. We aimed to investigate the relationship between allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. METHODS: Participants in a population-based study of 15-69-year-olds in 1990 were invited to a follow-up in 1998. A total of 734 subjects were examined on two occasions eight years apart. Allergic rhinitis to pollen was defined as a history of nasal symptoms on exposure to pollens and IgE specific to pollen. Allergic asthma to pollen was defined as a history of lower airway symptoms on exposure to pollens and IgE specific to pollen. Similarly, diagnoses of allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma to animals or mite were defined. RESULTS: At follow-up, all subjects with allergic asthma to pollen (n = 52) had in addition allergic rhinitis to pollen. In the longitudinal analysis, there were a total of 28 new (incident) cases of allergic asthma to pollen. They all had allergic rhinitis to pollen at baseline, or had developed allergic rhinitis to pollen at follow-up. Accordingly, allergic rhinitis to animals and mite were ubiquitous in subjects with allergic asthma to animals and mite, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the hypothesis that allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma are manifestations of the same disease entity.     

Atopy in childhood. II. Relationship to airway responsiveness, hay fever and asthma

While airway hyperresponsiveness is usually associated with a diagnosis of asthma or symptoms of wheezing, some individuals with rhinitis show airway hyperresponsiveness as do some with no symptoms whatsoever. We have studied the correlations between symptoms, airway hyperresponsiveness and atopy as determined by skin-prick tests in a cohort of New Zealand children. A total of 662 members of a birth cohort were studied at age 13 years using a respiratory questionnaire, skin-prick tests to 11 common allergens, and an abbreviated validated methacholine challenge test to determine airway responsiveness. Airway hyperresponsiveness (methacholine PC20 FEV1 < or = 8 mg/ml) was strongly correlated with reported asthma and current wheezing (P<0.0001) and also with atopy, especially to house dust mite and cat (P<0.0001). As weal size for both house dust mite and cat increased, so did the proportion of children with airway hyperresponsiveness. All children with diagnosed asthma and airway hyperresponsiveness were atopic. Skin-test reactions to house dust mite and cat were strongly correlated with any degree of measurable airway responsiveness (PC20 FEV1 < or = 25 mg/ml) in children with rhinitis (P<0.00001), and remained significantly correlated even in children without current asthma, without asthma ever and without rhinitis (P<0.001). Atopy is a major determinant of airway hyperresponsiveness in children, not only in those with reported histories of asthma and wheezing, but also in the absence of any history suggesting asthma and rhinitis.