Prospective study of photorefractive keratectomy for hyperopia using an axicon lens and erodible mask

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the long-term safety, efficacy, and visual performance following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for hyperopia using an erodible mask and axicon lens system. METHODS: Eighteen eyes of 9 patients with a mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of +2.26 +/- 0.82 D (range, +1.13 to +4.00 D) underwent PRK with the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser following manual scraping of the epithelium. Eyes were prospectively evaluated 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months following the procedure. Primary outcome variables included cycloplegic refraction and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA). Visual performance was determined by contrast sensitivity measurements under scotopic (21 lux) and photopic (324 lux) conditions and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) under scotopic, photopic, and glare conditions. RESULTS: For 18 eyes, 98.2% of the mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was corrected to +0.04 +/- 0.87 D (range, -1.38 to +2.00 D) at 24 months after PRK. Twelve eyes (67%) were within +/-0.50 D of attempted correction and 15 eyes (83%) were within +/-1.00 D. Stability within +/-0.50 D was achieved after 6 months. Two eyes (11%) experienced almost complete regression of the refractive effect. There was no statistically significant decrease in contrast sensitivity under scotopic or photopic conditions. (P > .05). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity showed progressive improvement in the early postoperative period. By 24 months, 0 eyes (0%) lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA under scotopic and photopic conditions and 1 eye (5.5%) lost 2 or more lines under glare conditions. Fourteen eyes (78%) had grade 1 to 3 anterior stromal haze at 24 months which was characteristically mid-peripheral and did not adversely affect visual performance. CONCLUSION: Photorefractive keratectomy with the the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser for low to moderate hyperopia resulted in an effective reduction of hyperopia without compromising long-term visual performance. Stability and recovery of distance uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity took approximately 6 months.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for myopia: two-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To assess and compare the clinical results (efficacy, safety, stability, and postoperative pain or discomfort) of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of low to moderate myopia. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was performed in 184 eyes of 92 patients who had surface excimer ablation for the correction of myopia. The preoperative mean spherical equivalent (MSE) was -4.65 diopters (D) +/- 3.14 (SD) (range -1.75 to -7.50 D). In each patient, LASEK was performed in 1 eye and PRK in the fellow eye by the same surgeon. The first eye treated and the surgical method used in the first eye were randomized. Both procedures were performed with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser using the same parameters and nomogram. The postoperative pain level, visual recovery, complications (haze), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and refractive outcome were evaluated and compared. All eyes completed a 24-month follow-up. RESULTS: The postoperative MSE was -0.18 +/- 0.53 D in the PRK eyes and -0.33 +/- 0.46 D in the LASEK eyes. At 1 week, the mean UCVA was 0.64 +/- 0.21 and 0.87 +/- 0.23, respectively. No LASEK eye lost a line of BSCVA. There were no statistically significant differences between PRK and LASEK eyes in the safety and efficacy indices at 2 years. The mean pain level was significantly lower on days 1 to 3 in the LASEK eyes (P <.05). The mean corneal haze level was lower in the LASEK eyes (0.21) than in the PRK eyes (0.43) (P <.05). Seventy-nine patients preferred LASEK to PRK. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy provided significantly quicker visual recovery, eliminated post-PRK pain, and reduced the haze level in eyes with low to moderate myopia compared with conventional PRK. It provided good visual and refractive outcomes. There were no serious complications.     

Clear lens extraction with intraocular lens followed by photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis

OBJECTIVE: To study photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) after clear lens extraction (CLE) with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for hyperopia or astigmatism. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five eyes (55 subjects) had CLE with posterior chamber IOL implants for hyperopia up to 12.25 diopters (D); 31 eyes were retreated with PRK, and 34 eyes were retreated with LASIK for residual ametropias. INTERVENTION: For PRK and LASIK, the refractive surgery was performed with the slit-scanning excimer laser Nidek EC-5000, Nidek Co., Tokyo, Japan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Manifest refraction, best-spectacle and uncorrected Snellen visual acuity, haze, and halos were evaluated before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative. RESULTS: Forty-seven eyes were evaluated at the 12-month postoperative examination: 96% of these eyes had spherical equivalents (SE) within +/-2 D of emmetropia, 79% of eyes had SE within +/-1 D of emmetropia and 51% of eyes had SE within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia. Eighty-five percent of the eyes at 12 months postoperative had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better, and 46% of eyes had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Eighty-seven percent of the eyes at 12 months postoperative had uncorrected visual acuity within 1 Snellen line of their initial best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) before all treatment. No eye lost 2 Snellen lines of BSCVA at 3, 6, or 12 months after PRK or after LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: IOL implantation for CLE, although an invasive technique, resulted in better refractive outcomes without laser-related clinical complications after PRK or LASIK adjustment.     

Eight-year follow-up of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia

PURPOSE: We evaluated 8-year results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia in terms of stability and late complications. METHODS: Ninety-two myopic eyes of 55 patients were treated with a single-step method using an Aesculap-Meditec MEL 60 excimer laser with a 5.0-mm ablation zone. Treated eyes were divided into three groups according to preoperative refraction: low myopes (< or = -6.00 D), medium myopes (-6.10 to -10.00 D), and high myopes (>-10.00 D). RESULTS: Change in myopic regression stabilized in all myopia groups within 12 months, although a small myopic shift occurred up to 8 years after PRK. Mean change in refraction between 2 and 8 years was -0.42 +/- 0.48 D for low myopes, -0.37 +/- 0.34 D for medium myopes, and -0.41 +/- 0.50 D for high myopes. The percentage of eyes within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia 8 years after PRK was 78.3% in the low myopia group, 68.8% in the medium myopia group, and 57.1% in the high myopia group. One eye lost 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity due to irregular astigmatism. In 13.0% of eyes, a residual trace corneal haze was observed, which had no effect on visual acuity. Apart from the loss of 2 lines of BSCVA in one eye, there were no other late complications during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The mean change in refraction between 2 and 8 years was less than -0.50 D, regardless of preoperative refraction, and may be attributed to natural age-related refractive change. The appearance of residual corneal haze after 8 years correlated with the amount of myopic correction. PRK was a safe and stable surgical procedure in this group of patients.     

Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: a control-matched study

OBJECTIVE: Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) outcomes were compared at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seven LASIK-treated eyes (58 patients) and 107 PRK-treated eyes (91 patients) having myopia between -1 and -9.50 diopters (D). All LASIK-treated eyes were analyzed retrospectively and matched with PRK-treated eyes having sphere within +/-0.25 D, +/-1 D of cylinder, and +/-7 years of age. INTERVENTION: For PRK and LASIK, the refractive surgery was performed with the slit-scanning excimer laser Nidek EC-5000, (Nidek Co. Tokyo, Japan) MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Manifest refraction, best-spectacle and uncorrected Snellen visual acuity, haze, halos, and keratometry were evaluated before surgery and up to 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Seventy percent of eyes were evaluated at the 12-month postoperative exam. Of these eyes, 83% of LASIK cases and 86% of PRK cases had uncorrected visual acuities of 20/20 or better. Refractions within +/-0.5 D represented 78% of the LASIK eyes and 83% of the PRK eyes at that follow-up. Patients who underwent LASIK reported halos twice as often as patients who underwent PRK using a subjective scale. The odds ratio of high halos for LASIK versus PRK was 3.50 (95% confidence interval, 1.89-6.46; P<0.0001). At 1 month after surgery, 64% of the LASIK eyes were within +/-0.50 D compared with 77% of the PRK eyes. No eye lost 2 Snellen lines of best corrected visual acuity at 6 or 12 months after surgery. Ten PRK eyes (9.3%) and three LASIK eyes (2.8%) were retreated. CONCLUSIONS: PRK and LASIK achieved equal refractive outcomes at all postoperative follow-ups, but LASIK patients were twice as likely to experience halos.     

Long-term outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with previous epikeratophakia for keratoconus

PURPOSE: To determine the long-term safety and effectiveness of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the treatment of refractive errors after epikeratophakia (EP) for keratoconus. METHODS: Ten patients (14 eyes) who had refractive errors after EP for keratoconus received PRK surgery. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive error, corneal astigmatism, pachymetry, corneal topography, and complications were monitored. RESULTS: Mean follow-up after PRK was 63.4 +/- 19.8 months. Mean spherical equivalent was -5.5 +/- 3.9 D before PRK, -0.9 +/- 0.5 D at 1 month after PRK, and -1.5 +/- 1.0 D at 3 years. Mean astigmatism was 4.2 +/- 2.1 D before PRK, 1.2 +/- 0.5 D at 1 month after PRK, and 1.5 +/- 0.6 D at 3 years. Thirteen (93%) eyes had an UCVA <20/40, and 12 (86%) had a BSCVA of 20/40 or better before PRK. At 1 year, the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 8 (57%) eyes, and the BSCVA was 20/40 or better in all eyes. Mean central corneal thickness was 749 +/- 35 microm before PRK and 621 +/- 56 mum at 3 years. During the follow-up period, haze (grade no more than 1.0) was observed in 2 eyes. No immune rejection episode or recurrent keratoconus was found. CONCLUSIONS: PRK appears to be reliable and safe for the correction of residual ametropia after EP for keratoconus, and the visual acuity can remain stable after PRK for a long time.     

Bilateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia using two excimer lasers.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in patients who underwent PRK using the Summit Apex (Omnimed) excimer laser in one eye and the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser in the other. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent PRK with the Summit Apex laser (Omnimed) in one eye and the Nidek laser (EC-5000) in the second and had at least 12 months of follow-up were included in this retrospective study (n=30). Uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity, final spherical equivalent refraction, and grade of subepithelial haze were compared. The average preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of eyes treated with the Summit laser was -6.00 D (range, -2.50 to -8.75 D), and for Nidek-treated eyes it was -5.57 D (range, -2.50 to -8.80 D). RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of Summit-treated eyes and 53% of Nidek-treated eyes had uncorrected visual acuity of 6/6 or better; 61% of Summit-treated eyes and 63% of Nidek-treated eyes had uncorrected visual acuity of 6/7.5 or better; 95% of Summit-treated eyes and 95% of Nidek-treated eyes had uncorrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better (difference not statistically significant). Seventy-three percent of eyes treated with the Summit laser and 80% of eyes treated with the Nidek laser had a postoperative refraction within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia; 97% of Summit-treated eyes and 87% of Nidek-treated eyes had a postoperative spherical equivalent refraction within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia; the difference between the two lasers was not statistically significant. However, the percent of eyes with persistent hyperopia was smaller in the Nidek group after 3 months (P=.0062) and after 6 months (P=.07) than in the Summit group. Videokeratography was not done. CONCLUSION: Both lasers were effective with relatively low side effects. No significant difference was found between the two lasers in postoperative uncorrected visual acuity or refractive outcome. Eyes operated with the Nidek laser had less persistent hyperopia and stabilized earlier.     

Photorefractive keratectomy for post-penetrating keratoplasty myopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE: To determine the safety, effectiveness, and predictability of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. SETTING: Gazi University, Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: Photorefractive keratectomy was performed in 16 eyes of 16 patients with postkeratoplasty myopia and astigmatism who were unable to wear glasses due to anisometropia and were contact lens intolerant. They were examined for uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and corneal transplant integrity before and after surgery. RESULTS: The mean follow-up after PRK was 26.0 months +/- 15.7 (SD) (range 12 to 63 months). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of -4.47 +/- 1.39 diopters (D) was -3.39 +/- 1.84 D (P >.05) at the last postoperative visit and the mean preoperative cylinder of -5.62 +/- 2.88 D was -3.23 +/- 1.70 D (P <.05); refractive regression correlated with the amount of ablation performed. The BSCVA decreased in 3 eyes (18.8%), and the UCVA decreased in 2 (12.5%). Six eyes (37.5%) had grade 2 to 3 haze, which resolved spontaneously in 4 eyes within a relatively long time but caused a decrease in BSCVA in 2 (12.5%). Two of the eyes (12.5%) had a rejection episode after PRK and were successfully treated with topical steroids. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy to correct postkeratoplasty myopia and astigmatism appears to be less effective and less predictable than PRK for naturally occurring myopia and astigmatism. Corneal haze and refractive regression are more prevalent, and patient satisfaction is not good.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of hyperopia. Results of a 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for low to moderate hyperopia with a 2-year follow-up. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. METHODS: This prospective comparative single-surgeon study included 216 eyes of 108 patients with hyperopia who received PRK in 1 eye and LASEK in the contralateral eye. The mean patient age was 38.3 years (range 25 to 58 years). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) cycloplegic refraction was +3.67 diopters (D) +/- 1.15 (SD) (range +2.00 to +5.00 D), and astigmatism was less than 1.00 D. In each patient, PRK was performed in 1 eye (Group A) and LASEK was performed in the other eye (Group B) using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, manifest and cycloplegic refractions, refractive stability and predictability, postoperative pain, and corneal haze were examined and statistically analyzed. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: At 1 week, the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 58% of PRK eyes and 85% of LASEK eyes (P =.037); at 2 years, it was 20/40 or better in 81% and 91%, respectively (P =.076). At 2 years, the UCVA for near was N8 or better in 73% of PRK eyes and 89% of LASEK eyes (P =.064). No patient lost 2 or more lines of Snellen visual acuity. The safety index was 1.03 in PRK eyes and 1.08 in LASEK eyes. Refractive stability was achieved at 6 months in LASEK eyes and at 12 months in PRK eyes. The mean SE cycloplegic refraction decreased from +3.58 D (PRK eyes) and +3.76 D (LASEK eyes) at baseline to +0.74 D and +0.32 D, respectively, at 2 years; in 57% and 78% of eyes, respectively, the refraction was within +/-0.50 D of the targeted refraction. Peripheral corneal haze scores at 3 to 9 months and pain scores at 1 to 3 days were significantly lower in the LASEK group than in the PRK group. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for hyperopia up to +5.00 D provided good visual and refractive results. It significantly reduced postoperative pain, grade of peripheral ring-shaped corneal haze, and regression of hyperopia. Hyperopic LASEK provided quicker visual recovery and achieved better efficacy, predictability, and refractive stability than hyperopic PRK.     

Excimer laser retreatment of residual myopia following photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy for compound myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the safety, efficacy, and visual performance of excimer laser enhancement following photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) with the Summit Apex Plus. SETTING: Stanford University School of Medicine Eye Laser Clinic, Stanford, California, USA. METHODS: As part of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial, 93 eyes of 56 patients with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -4.98 diopters (D) +/- 1.80 (SD) (range -1.75 to -8.50 D) had PARK for compound myopic astigmatism using the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser and a poly(methyl methacrylate) erodible mask. Seventeen eyes with a mean SE of -2.08 +/- 0.76 D required excimer laser refractive keratectomy for residual spherical myopia or compound myopic astigmatism. Patients were prospectively followed 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12+ months after the enhancement procedure. Primary outcome variables included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), refraction, vector analysis, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) under standard ambient conditions (photopic, scotopic, and glare), corneal clarity, and contrast sensitivity function curve under photopic and scotopic conditions. RESULTS: At the last postoperative visit, the mean sphere had been corrected 82% to a residual of -0.29 +/- 1.23 D and mean SE had been corrected 65% to a residual of -0.74 +/- 1.27 D. Eighty-two percent of eyes were within +/-1.0 D of attempted correction. Eighty-eight percent had a UCVA of 20/40 or better. Vector analysis demonstrated a difference vector of within +/-1.0 D in 75% of eyes that had PARK retreatment. There was no significant loss in the contrast sensitivity curve. Late regression associated with corneal haze and loss of BSCVA occurred in 2 eyes (11.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Retreatment following PARK for compound myopic astigmatism results in effective reduction in residual spherical myopia and compound myopic astigmatism. An improvement in UCVA without loss of contrast sensitivity can be expected in most eyes. However, regression, corneal haze, and loss of BSCVA may occur. Further studies are indicated to predict risk factors for these complications.     

Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy mode using SCHWIND-ESIRIS excimer laser: initial clinical results

AIM: To evaluate postoperative pain, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and cornea haze value after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK) performed with aspherical ablation profile using SCHWIND ESIRIS excimer laser. METHODS: Retrospective case series. Fifty-nice eyes (32 patients) with myopia associated with or without astigmatism underwent phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) followed by photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) which performed by Optimized Refractive Keratecomy (ORK)-CAM software based on aspherical ablation profile using SCHWIND ESIRIS excimer laser. Postoperative pain scale was measured on a questionnaire through five levels. Haze was graded by five grades, and UCVA, manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean pain level was (1.37±0.613) (range: 1 to 3), the mean time picking out the soft contact lens was (6.22±1.73) days, at 3 months, UCVA was 1.0 for 40 eyes (67.8%), 0.5 for all eyes (100.0%). The UCVA was significantly less than the preoperative best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) (t=-2.84, P=0.006), haze value was (0.27±0.25), no patients had a haze grade up to 2. Mean MRSE was (0.76±0.96) diopter(D) by 3 months. CONCLUSION: The outcomes from this study show that using the SCHWIND ESIRIS aspherical ablation profile for transepithelial PRK has a good visual result. The primary advantage is related to a spherical ablation profile, automatically considers the ablation volume of the stroma and the accurate and smooth removal of the epithelium with PTK. Additional studies are needed to determine long-term outcomes.     

Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy mode using SCHWIND-ESIRIS excimer laser: initial clinical results

AIM: To evaluate postoperative pain, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and cornea haze value after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK) performed with aspherical ablation profile using SCHWIND ESIRIS excimer laser. METHODS: Retrospective case series. Fifty-nice eyes (32 patients) with myopia associated with or without astigmatism underwent phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) followed by photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) which performed by Optimized Refractive Keratecomy (ORK)-CAM software based on aspherical ablation profile using SCHWIND ESIRIS excimer laser. Postoperative pain scale was measured on a questionnaire through five levels. Haze was graded by five grades, and UCVA, manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean pain level was (1.37±0.613) (range: 1 to 3), the mean time picking out the soft contact lens was (6.22±1.73) days, at 3 months, UCVA was 1.0 for 40 eyes (67.8%), 0.5 for all eyes (100.0%). The UCVA was significantly less than the preoperative best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) (t=-2.84, P=0.006), haze value was (0.27±0.25), no patients had a haze grade up to 2. Mean MRSE was (0.76±0.96) diopter(D) by 3 months. CONCLUSION: The outcomes from this study show that using the SCHWIND ESIRIS aspherical ablation profile for transepithelial PRK has a good visual result. The primary advantage is related to a spherical ablation profile, automatically considers the ablation volume of the stroma and the accurate and smooth removal of the epithelium with PTK. Additional studies are needed to determine long-term outcomes.     

Clinical results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for high myopic anisometropia in children: four-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive results of multizonal photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for high myopic anisometropia and contact-lens intolerance in children. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. METHODS: Twenty-one patients aged 7 to 15 years with high myopic anisometropia had multizonal PRK in the more myopic eye and were retrospectively analyzed. The scanning-slit Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser was used. Postoperatively, patients were reviewed at 1 and 3 days, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months. The examination included cycloplegic refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), biomicroscopy, grading of postoperative haze, corneal topography, pachymetry, intraocular pressure, biometry, orthoptic status, binocular vision (BV), and fundus evaluation. The safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability of the procedure were evaluated. Long-term binocular vision outcome was analyzed. All patients completed a 4-year follow-up. RESULTS: The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was 8.93 diopters (D) +/- 1.39 (SD) (range -6.75 to -11.75 D) and the mean postoperative SE, -1.66 +/- 0.68 D (range -0.50 to -2.75 D) (P <.05). The mean preoperative UCVA of 0.034 +/- 0.016 increased to 0.35 +/- 0.15 (P <.05) postoperatively. The mean preoperative BSCVA was 0.53 +/- 0.19 and changed to 0.64 +/- 0.16 postoperatively. The safety index was 1.21. No eye lost a line of BSCVA; 9 eyes gained 1 line, and 5 eyes gained 2 lines. The efficacy index was 0.66. The postoperative uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected BV were the same or improved. No eye had +3 haze. There were no significant complications. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy was safe and effective in correcting high myopic anisometropia in children who were contact-lens intolerant. It provided good visual results and preserved or improved BV over the 4-year follow-up.     

Prophylactic mitomycin C to inhibit corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy for residual myopia following radial keratotomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% in inhibiting haze formation after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for residual myopia following radial keratotomy (RK). METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized, noncomparative interventional case series was conducted of 22 eyes (14 patients) with residual myopia after RK performed at a single institution. All eyes were treated with PRK and a single intraoperative topical application of MMC 0.02% solution for 2 minutes using a soaked cellulose sponge placed over the ablated area. Refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and slit-lamp evidence of cotneal opacity (haze) were evaluated over 12 months. RESULTS: Twelve months postoperatively, 3 eyes showed grade 1 haze, and 2 eyes showed grade 0.5 haze. Twelve months postoperatively, 2 (9%) eyes had UCVA > or = 20/20. No eye before and 17 (77%) eyes after treatment had UCVA > or = 20/40, and no eye before and 9 eyes (40.9%) after treatment had UCVA > or = 20/25. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was > or = 20/40 in all (100%) eyes and 21 (95%) eyes before and after treatment, respectively, and > or = 20/25 in 12 (54.5%) eyes before and after treatment. One (4.5%) eye lost 1 line of BSCVA. Mean spherical equivalent refraction achieved was -0.18 diopters (D) (range: -0.75 to +0.50 D) compared to -2.72 D (range: -1.50 to -4.00 D) before treatment. Twelve months after treatment, 19 (85.5%) eyes had a refractive outcome within +/- 0.50 D. CONCLUSIONS: A single intraoperative application of MMC 0.02% for 2 minutes appears to be effective in preventing subepithelial haze after PRK for residual myopia in patients with undercorrection or regression following RK.     

Photorefractive keratectomy for myopia with a 15 Hz repetition rate

PURPOSE: To evaluate excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia using a repetition rate of 15 Hz instead of 10 Hz. SETTING: The Cornea and Laser Eye Institute, Teaneck, and Department of Ophthalmology, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA. METHODS: Photorefractive keratectomy using a 15 Hz repetition rate was performed in 23 eyes of 14 patients by a single surgeon at 1 center. The attempted corrections ranged from -2.8 diopters (D) to -5.5 D. Preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), predictability, corneal haze, and subjective glare/halo were evaluated over 6 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, UCVA was 20/32 or better in all eyes and at least 20/20 in 14 eyes (73.7%). Two eyes (10.5%) lost 2 or more Snellen lines of BSCVA; postoperative BSCVA was at least 20/25 in 100% of eyes and 20/20 or better in 95.0%. Fifteen eyes (78.9%) were within +/-0.5 D of attempted correction, and 19 (100%) were within +/-1.0 D. Mean spherical equivalent refraction was -4.62 D preoperatively, +0.15 D at 1 month, -0.09 D at 3 months, and -0.37 D at 6 months. At 6 months, 4 eyes (21.0%) had no corneal haze and 14 (73.7%) had trace subepithelial haze. Fifteen eyes (78.9%) had no glare/halo effect at 6 months, and 4 (21.0%) had minimal glare/halo effect. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes after excimer laser PRK for myopia using an increased repetition rate of 15 Hz were good and similar to those in studies conducted with a 10 Hz repetition rate.     

Results of bilateral photorefractive keratectomy

OBJECTIVE: To study the refraction and potential risks of bilateral photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred eighteen consecutive patients (836 eyes) with myopia from -18 to -0.50 diopters (D) had bilateral simultaneous refractive surgery. INTERVENTION: Refractive surgery was performed with the Nidek EC-5000 slit-scanning excimer laser (Nidek Co., Tokyo, Japan). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Manifest refraction, Snellen best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and uncorrected visual acuity, haze, and halos were evaluated for 12 months after surgery. Both eyes of each patient were examined at the same follow-up after initial treatment. RESULTS: At 12 months after surgery, 95% of eyes were within +/- 1D of emmetropia, and 0.4% of patients had residual anisometropia more than 2 D. Thirty-three eyes (3.9%) were retreated, whereas 5 patients (1.2%) had retreatments in both eyes. Odds ratios between unilateral versus bilateral postoperative events were evaluated for the retreatments (1:0.22; P = 0.001), undercorrections more than 1 D (1:0.17; P < 0.0001), overcorrections more than 1 D (1:0.23; P < 0.0001), loss of 1 line of BSCVA (1:0.44; P < or = 0.002), and loss of 2 lines of BSCVA (1:0.18; P = 0.013). At 12 months after surgery, one eye with a loss of 2 lines of BSCVA was treated for haze more than 1; the fellow eye had haze 0.75. No patient had bilateral haze more than 1. At 12 months after surgery, no patient lost 2 lines of BSCVA in both eyes. There was a higher incidence of halos in both eyes rather than in one eye only (odds ratio: 4.17; P < 0.0001). No postoperative infections occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral events occurred approximately 2.5 to 4 times less often than unilateral events, except for the incidence of halos. The calculated odds ratio did not show an increased risk for the fellow eye while performing bilateral surgery, although not exempted from the risk of infection. It may be difficult to predict a complication in the fellow eye based on the results of the first operated eye.     

Ten-year follow-up of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia of less than -6 diopters

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of excimer laser myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia of less than -6 diopters (D). DESIGN: Long-term (10-year) follow-up retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: The study included 225 eyes of 138 myopic patients with spherical equivalent (SE) between 0 and -6 D treated with myopic PRK at the Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain, using the VISX 20/20 excimer laser (Santa Clara, California, USA). The main outcome measures were refractive predictability and stability, mean corneal keratometry, topographical cylinder, safety, efficacy, stability of visual acuity, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: At 10 years, 169 (75%) of 225 eyes were within +/- 1.00 D and 207 (92%) were within +/- 2.00 D. Ninety-five (42%) eyes underwent retreatments because of overcorrection, regression, or both. The mean SE slightly decreased (myopic regression) with a mean magnitude of -0.10 +/- 1.08 D over 10 years (-0.01 +/- 0.11 D per year). Forty-one (58%) of 225 eyes demonstrated increase in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity after 10 years. Only one eye lost eight lines because of significant cataract, and two eyes lost vision (one lost seven lines and the other lost four lines) because of posterior segment-related complications. The mean corneal haze score gradually decreased from 0.22 +/- 0.39 at three months to 0.01 +/- 0.09 at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy for myopia of less than -6 D is a safe and effective procedure in the long-term.     

Cooling effect on excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of cooling on pain, corneal haze, and refractive outcome after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. METHODS: The corneal surface was cooled before, during, and after laser ablation using a method called cooling PRK. Thirty-eighty highly myopic eyes of 38 patients whose spherical errors ranged from -8.00 to -18.75 diopters (D) were randomized into 2 groups: 16 eyes with conventional PRK and 22 eyes with cooling PRK. Postoperative pain was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Refraction, visual acuity, and complications were followed for up to 2 years. All data were analyzed and compared between groups to evaluate the cooling effect on PRK. RESULTS: One day postoperatively, patients in the cooling PRK group had significantly less pain (P < .01). At 3 months, the haze score in the cooling PRK group was significantly less than in the conventional PRK group (P < .01). The residual refractive error was not significantly different between the 2 groups until 2 years, when it was greater in the conventional PRK (mean -5.09 D +/- 2.11 [SD]) than the cooling PRK group (-4.64 +/- 2.27 D). Ten eyes (62.5%) in the conventional PRK group and 15 eyes (68.2%) in the cooling PRK group were within +/- 1.00 D of the intended refraction. There were no serious complications in the cooling PRK group. Two eyes in the conventional PRK group had severe corneal haze and lost 2 Snellen lines of best corrected visual acuity. CONCLUSION: Corneal cooling on PRK effectively reduced postoperative pain, corneal haze, and myopic regression.     

Transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy/photorefractive keratectomy with adjunctive mitomycin-C for complicated LASIK flaps

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy/photorefractive keratectomy (PTK/PRK) with prophylactic mitomycin-C for the treatment of refractive errors and maintenance of corneal clarity following flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Outpatient tertiary care center, Chicago, Illinois, USA. METHODS: Ten eyes of 10 patients with LASIK flap complications had transepithelial PTK/PRK for correction of ametropia. Mitomycin-C 0.02% was applied to the stroma for 2 minutes following laser ablation. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractions, and slitlamp examinations were obtained. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the mean UCVA was 20/400 (range 20/40 to counting fingers), the mean BSCVA was 20/28.5, and the spherical equivalent refractive errors ranged from +4.00 to -10.75 diopters (D). After the procedure, the mean UCVA was 20/28, the mean BSCVA was 20/21, and the spherical equivalent refractive errors ranged from +0.37 to -1.00 D. The mean follow-up ranged from 8 to 28 months. No patient experienced delayed reepithelialization, haze, or other signs of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Mitomycin-C can be a useful adjunctive therapy for the prevention of haze when applying surface excimer laser therapy to a cornea following LASIK flap complications.     

Photorefractive keratectomy retreatment after LASIK

PURPOSE: To study the results of late photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in corneas originally subjected to LASIK. METHODS: Seven eyes of seven patients who had LASIK for myopia were retreated with PRK at least 2 years after LASIK. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, and haze were evaluated before and after LASIK and after retreatment by PRK. RESULTS: Photorefractive keratectomy retreatment improved BSCVA in six (86%) of seven eyes, and one (14%) eye showed no changes. None of the eyes lost lines of BSCVA. Five of seven eyes developed mild haze, which disappeared before the last postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy retreatment performed at least 2 years after LASIK can improve visual acuity. We hypothesize that LASIK-induced corneal nerve damage disturbs corneal wound healing by increasing the tendency for development of haze.