Contact urticaria and rhinitis from latex surgical gloves

Latex used in the manufacture of surgical gloves should be included in a list of allergens. It is found in the tree Hevea braziliensis. For approximately the last year, minutes after using surgical gloves, a female doctor had severe pruritus followed by a rash and angio-oedema of the contact areas. During the last 4 months, on opening the glove-bag, she experienced severe rhinitis and respiratory distress. The symptoms ceased in 1 h. Standard patch tests and with substances used in the manufacture of rubber were negative. Prick tests with glove and natural latex were strongly positive. The presence of specific IgE against natural latex was demonstrated by means of a histamine release assay as well as by immunoenzymatic methods. The antigen seems to have a MW higher than 30,000 d and is trypsin-sensitive. These facts suggest that the allergen could be a protein present in the "crude natural latex".     

Latex allergy update: Four vignettes

Four vignettes of occupational natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy are presented. Each had contact urticaria, 2 of 4 had systemic symptoms, 3 were allergic to cross-reacting fruit, and 2 had pollen and tree allergy. Recent information on latex cross-reactivity with fruit and pollen is discussed along with an update on latex radioallergosorbent tests and control of NRL allergy.     

Investigative methods for natural rubber latex allergy in the UK

Allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) has become an important health issue in recent years, but little is known about how this condition is investigated by physicians in the UK. This postal questionnaire of British dermatology and allergy specialists shows substantial variation in diagnostic practice, most notably with regard to the utilization and choice of starting dose of commercial latex prick test dilutions, reliance on allergen-specific immunoglobulin E measurement, investigation of associated fruit allergy and provision of resuscitation equipment/method of consent when challenge testing. 17% of responding physicians who investigate for NRL allergy do not perform prick test or glove challenge because of the potential risk of anaphylaxis or lack of resuscitation facilities. 87% of allergy clinic specialists report no reduction in the number of patients presenting as new referrals with suspected NRL allergy. These findings suggest a need for robust guidance to achieve more consistent investigative practice by those dealing with this condition.     

Results of skin tests with pollen extracts of fruit trees in patients with pollen allergy

As there have recently been increasing publications on the correlation between tree pollen allergy and fruit allergy, we asked ourselves wether this might be caused by the parallel pollen times of Fagales trees and Rosales trees in our Central European climate. Accordingly, we tested 92 patients positively suffering from Fagales tree pollen allergy with the following Rosales tree pollen extracts: apple, cherry, plum, apricote, almande. 16 out of these patients showed reactions to Fagales pollen but not to Rosales pollen. All the other 76 patients revealed reactions to both the tested pollen extracts. Since these results show our thesis to be false, we have to assume a related (minor) antigen of both tree pollen groups.     

NEHUSHTAN: SIDE EFFECTS OF DRUGS

The role of the snake is ambivalent in the Bible. The primeval serpent was instrumental in the exile of Adam and Eve from Eden, but It did not really lie. The fruit of the tree did provide knowledge of good and evil and humankind has been blessed (cursed?) with that knowledge ever since (Gen 3:1–24).     

Contact urticaria from latex in healthcare workers

BACKGROUND: Latex allergy is an important medical problem for an increasing number of patients. It has been documented as causing immediate hypersensitivity reactions ranging from mild urticaria to life-threatening anaphylaxis after cutaneous, mucosal or visceral exposure. Recent studies in northern Europe and the USA suggest that between 2.8 and 16.9% of healthcare workers are affected by latex hypersensitivity type I reactions. OBJECTIVES: To test the prevalence of contact urticaria from latex gloves in a group of healthcare workers, to examine the factors associated with latex allergy and to evaluate some diagnostic methods used in latex allergy. METHODS: A total of 929 employees of the surgical units who used latex gloves on a regular basis, at least once a day, were invited to participate in this study including administration of a questionnaire, a prick test with a commercial extract of latex, a prick test with latex glove eluate, a use test, RAST and an immunoblotting system; moreover, a prick test with a group of common inhalant allergens and a prick-by-prick test with fresh fruit (banana, kiwi, avocado, chestnut) were employed. RESULTS: Of the 929 staff sent questionnaires, 313 (33.5%) replied; of those who responded, 118 gave a history of hand problems such as itch, erythema, wheals when wearing gloves, dryness and irritation most marked on the backs of the hands. Among these 118 workers, 16 refused skin testing and examination of blood, so 102 subjects were studied for latex allergy; 21/118 (17.8%) healthcare workers were found to be latex allergic. Eighty-one staff members gave a history of hand problems worsened by wearing gloves but were not latex allergic on testing. Those healthcare workers who completed the questionnaire and answered negatively (195/313) were not tested for latex allergy. Prick tests with the commercial solution were positive in 11 of the 21 subjects studied; prick tests with the eluate of glove, RAST and the use test were positive in all workers; 10 of the 21 sera showed positive immunoblot results. Atopy and a preexisting irritant contact eczema of the hands were present in a high percentage of the workers. CONCLUSION: In this study of healthcare personnel, we found that allergic contact urticaria from latex was present in 21 workers of the 313 (6.7%) who responded to the questionnaire and of the 102 (20.5%) who were tested for latex allergy. Atopy and irritant contact eczema of the hands were frequent in these subjects. Skin prick testing with latex glove eluate and the use test seem to be more sensitive than in vitro testing, particularly immunoblotting, and are biologically more relevant; skin testing with glove eluate must be preferred to testing with a commercial extract.     

Prevalence of natural rubber latex allergy (Type I and Type IV) in laboratory workers in The Netherlands

The objective of the study was to study the prevalence of Type IV and Type I allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) in a population at risk in the Netherlands. Laboratory workers regularly using gloves were invited to complete a questionnaire and to be tested. We performed patch tests with standard contact allergens, rubber additives, glove powder and pieces of 4 gloves; prick tests with inhalant allergens, glove extracts, glove powder and fruit extracts; and RASTs. Glove-related hand dermatitis was reported in 36.9% of the individuals interviewed. A positive patch test result for rubber additives was seen in only 6.6%. Glove-related urticaria, rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma were reported in 24.6% of all cases. Confirmation of an IgE-mediated reaction was achieved in 8.3% by prick test with glove extracts and 5.0% by RAST No reaction to glove powder was noticed in patch testing or in prick testing. A high prevalence rate of glove-related symptoms and NRL Type I allergy was found in laboratory workers exposed to rubber gloves. Surprisingly, there was no co-existence of Type I and Type IV allergy in this population.     

Natural rubber latex allergy

Rubber is an important industrial and consumer product encountered in many household items and medical devices. Whereas the chemical additives used in its manufacture are well recognized as a cause of delayed-type hypersensitivity (allergic contact dermatitis), it is only during the past decade that immediate-type allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) proteins (latex allergy) has emerged as a serious health issue. Frequent, prolonged wearing of NRL gloves, especially amongst health care workers, is a major risk factor for such sensitization. Latex allergy is now an important medical, occupational, medico-legal and financial problem, and it is essential that policies are developed to reduce it. Undiagnosed latex allergy is potentially very serious for patients. This article briefly overviews latex allergy with emphasis on the practical issues of diagnosis and management.     

Natural rubber latex allergy

Natural rubber latex (NRL) is a ubiquitous allergen as it is a component of > 40,000 products in everyday life. Latex allergy might be attributed to skin contact or inhalation of latex particles. Latex allergy is an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to NRL, presenting a wide range of clinical symptoms such as angioedema, swelling, cough, asthma, and anaphylactic reactions. Until 1979, latex allergy appeared only as type IV delayed hypersensitivity; subsequently, the proportion of different allergy types drifted towards type IV contact allergy reactions. Several risk factors for sensitization to NRL are already known and well documented. Some authors have established a positive correlation between a history of multiple surgical interventions, atopy, spina bifida malformation, and latex allergy incidence. We suspect an increase in latex allergy incidence in association with increased atopy and sensitivity to environmental allergens in the industrial population. It is often postulated in literature that the groups of workers at risk for this allergy are essentially workers in the latex industry and healthcare professionals. In this population, direct internal and mucosal contact with NRL medical devices may be the route of sensitization as factors such as the number of procedures and use of NRL materials (catheters and tubes) were associated with increased risk of latex sensitization and allergy.     

Comparative evaluation of Type 1 latex hypersensitivity in patients with chronic urticaria,rubber factory workers and healthy control subjects

Latex hypersensitivity manifests itself most commonly with contact urticaria. In this study, we investigated the frequency of latex hypersensitivity as a possible aetiological factor in patients with chronic urticaria (CU) and compared latex hypersensitivity of CU patients (n = 50) with that of rubber factory workers (n = 50) and healthy controls (n = 50). Prick test with latex and fruit extracts and determination of latex-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) were performed. As a risk factor, contact dermatitis due to rubber additives was tested by patch test. Latex hypersensitivity was detected in 14% of CU patients, 12% of rubber factory workers and 12% of healthy controls (P > 0.05). Positive patch test with rubber additives was detected in 6% of CU and 4% of rubber factory workers. 3 of 7 CU patients had sensitivity to fruits in addition to latex hypersensitivity. In 1 patient with CU, the clinical complaints were found to be related to latex hypersensitivity. These findings suggest that the frequency of latex hypersensitivity in CU patients is no higher than that in healthy individuals. However, CU patients should be carefully asked about latex allergy, as we demonstrated that 1 of the CU patients had undiagnosed symptomatic latex allergy.     

Pesticide contact dermatitis in fruit and vegetable farmers of Himachal Pradesh (India)

BACKGROUND: Not many studies on pesticide allergic contact dermatitis are available from Himachal Pradesh (India). OBJECTIVE: We studied the role of commonly used pesticides in causing allergic contact dermatitis in fruit and vegetable farmers in the region. METHODS: 30 fruit and vegetable farmer patients having dermatitis involving face, neck, hands, and feet and 20 controls comprising 2 groups of 10 subjects each: Group-1 had history of exposure to pesticides but no dermatitis and Group-2 having neither dermatitis nor history of exposure to pesticides, were patch tested with 10 most common pesticides used in the region. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: These 30 patients (M : F 21 : 9) were between 22-81 years of age having dermatitis for 4 days to 20 years with relapses and remissions. 21 patients had seasonal exacerbation. 10 patients attributed exacerbation of dermatitis to exposure to pesticides. Positive patch test reactions from pesticides were observed in 8 patients only. Captan was the most common sensitizer (5 patients), 2 patients were sensitive to propargite. Chlorpyrifos, tree spray oil and thiuram gave positive reaction in 1 patient each. 3 controls from Group-1 showed positive reactions to multiple pesticides. Pesticide related contact dermatitis appears more common than expected.     

Comprehensive analysis of 28 patients with latex allergy and prevalence of latex sensitization among hospital personnel

Recently anaphylactic shock caused by latex gloves and medical instruments has been discussed as an important problem in surgical operations. Patients with contact urticaria or anaphylaxis due to natural rubber latex were first reported in Japan in 1993, and the number of cases is gradually increasing. In the present study, we analyzed 28 patients examined in our clinic from 1993 to 1998. The diagnosis of latex allergy was made on the basis of clinical history, latex specific IgE antibody, skin test, and use test. The 3 male and 25 female patients included 20 nurses, 4 doctors, 2 housewives, one animal hospital employee, and one worker in a senile rehabilitation center. The majority were health care workers. Contact urticaria from rubber gloves was the most common clinical symptom. Some of the patients developed severe attacks of anaphylaxis. During the period from 1995 to 1997, we also performed a questionnaire study and a serum examination of latex specific IgE antibody among the personnel of our university hospital. The screening test for the antibody was more reliable than our questionnaire study in detecting latex-sensitive persons. The prevalence of latex allergy was found to be 4.6%. This indicates that not only dermatologists but also all hospital workers should be aware of this type of allergy.     

Patch testing with natural rubber latex

The prevalence of Type I and Type IV hypersensitivity to rubber allergens in patients with stasis eczema and/or venous leg ulcers over an 18-month period was studied by prick and patch testing. Results from 109 patients were analysed. Positive patch tests were found in 71 patients (65%). Delayed-type hypersensitivity to rubber chemicals was found in 17 patients (15.6%). However, only 1 patient who had additional risk factors showed Type I hypersensitivity to natural rubber latex. We therefore conclude that, although Type IV hypersensitivity to rubber chemicals is relatively common in our patients, Type I hypersensitivity to natural rubber latex remains rare.     

Allergenicity of natural rubber latex gloves

The concentrations of proteins, allergens and rubber chemicals are essential parameters of the allergenicity of NRL gloves. To date, a standardized method has been given only for analysis of the protein concentration (DIN EN 455-3), and not for the concentrations of allergens and rubber chemicals. In the present study, we investigated 11 brands of surgical gloves currently available on the German market. Additionally 1 glove, not subjected to final leaching procedures, was added for comparison purposes. Protein concentrations were analysed by different methods in different laboratories. Allergen concentrations were assayed by prick tests in NRL-allergic volunteers and by RAST inhibition methods. Rubber chemicals were analysed by HPTLC and GC. The protein concentrations analysed by the Lowry method in the 2 laboratories gave concordant results, but the correlations between protein and allergen concentrations were low. The protein concentration analysed by HPLC correlated with the allergen concentration, and gave better information on the allergenicity of the gloves. The development of standardized methods for allergen analysis in the assessment routine is necessary, due to significant discrepancy between protein and allergen levels of some gloves. Thiurams were not found in any of the gloves, though carbamates were present in all gloves tested. Our data indicate that washing procedures have little or no effect on the concentration of rubber chemicals.     

Allergic contact dermatitis from latex rubber

Summary Previously we have found occasional patients with delayed hypersensitivity to latex (in rubber gloves) in the absence of allergy to any chemicals in the rubber chemical screen. There are many reports of contact urticaria to latex and isolated reports of delayed hypersensitivity to latex, usually in the presence of contact urticaria. To establish if latex rubber is a more common cause of delayed hypersensitivity than is currently recognized, we patch tested all patients attending our contact dermatitis clinic, over a 6-month period, with latex. Of 822 patients, 16 (1.9%) demonstrated positive cutaneous reactions to latex. Six exhibited contact urticaria to latex, five contact urticaria and allergic contact dermatitis, and five allergic contact dermatitis alone. Of the five with delayed hypersensitivity to latex in the absence of contact urticaria, only one was atopic and the sensitivity was thought to be relevant or possibly relevant in four. Of our patients, 1.2% exhibited positive patch-test reactions to latex. Patch testing with latex should be considered where contact dermatitis to a latex rubber-containing product is suspected, e.g. gloves and footwear.     

Oral allergy syndrome in patients with airborne pollen allergy treated with specific immunotherapy

According to literature, approximately 20%-70% of patients sensitized to pollen allergens experience oral allergy syndrome (OAS) symptoms after eating raw fruits and vegetables. There is no standard treatment established for OAS except avoiding implicated food. However, in patients with airborne pollen allergy treated with specific immunotherapy (SIT), an improvement of OAS symptoms has been reported in 30% to even 84% of individuals examined. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of OAS symptoms in patients with various manifestations of pollen airborne allergy (atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma, allergic rhinitis) treated with subcutaneous type of SIT. In addition, the most common patterns of cross-reactivity in OAS were analyzed and correlations between OAS symptoms and patient age, type of sensitizing pollen allergens and atopy manifestations investigated. Also, the relationship between SIT duration and clinical improvement of both OAS symptoms and pollen allergy symptoms was analyzed. The study included 57 patients with airborne allergy treated with allergen vaccination (60% male and 40% female). Allergic rhinitis was diagnosed in 71%, AD in 19%, AD and asthma in 4%, allergic rhinitis and asthma in 4%, and both AD and allergic rhinitis in 2% of study patients. Twenty-eight percent of study patients complained of overt symptoms of OAS (22% of allergic rhinitis patients and 27% of AD patients); 69% of the subjects presenting with OAS showed polyvalent airborne allergy to pollens and 31% were sensitized to only one group of pollen allergens (mostly grass pollens, tree pollens and mugwort pollens). There was no statistically significant correlation between the presence of OAS symptoms and patient diagnosis, patient age and type of allergen vaccination used. According to patients' opinion, SIT significantly improved oral symptoms in 50% of study patients, 44% reported no impact of SIT on OAS symptoms and 6% of patients observed worsening of OAS symptoms after unintentional ingestion of implicated food during the course of SIT. The study revealed OAS as a significant problem in patients sensitized to various pollen allergens. The results on OAS prevalence in atopic subjects (28%) were consistent with some literature data. There was clear association between OAS and polyvalent airborne allergy (69%). Cross-reactivity patterns were typical (for example, tree pollen allergy - intolerance of apples, carrots and potatoes; grass pollen allergy - intolerance of kiwi fruit and tomatoes). Questionnaire analysis indicated that subcutaneous SIT significantly alleviated OAS symptoms associated with ingestion of the responsible fruit and vegetables in half of study subjects. Further evaluation of the duration/persistence and stability of the phenomenon is planned for the future.     

Allergic contact dermatitis from natural latex.

BACKGROUND: Reports on natural latex allergy have increased steadily during the last 10 years. Latex allergy generally refers to a type 1 reaction to natural rubber latex (NRL) proteins with clinical manifestations ranging from contact urticaria to asthma and anaphylaxis. Previous United States studies on NRL allergy largely have been reported by allergists with little detailed information on hand eczema, contact allergy, or on outcome. The present study was performed from March 1998 to November 1999 with the aim of finding out the prevalence of type IV hypersensitivity to latex in patients with suspected rubber allergy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 167 patients with hand eczema and contact with rubber products underwent patch testing with the standard screening and rubber components (test series Deutsche Kontaktallergiegruppe), and NRL pure provided by Regent (liquid high ammonia 0.7% NRL, accelerator, and preservative-free latex) between March 1998 and November 1999. The charts of all NRL positive patients are reported with the results of history, prick, patch tests, total IgE, specific IgE to latex (FEIA) test and follow-up data (after 6 months). RESULTS: Four patients (3 men) showed positive patch test results to NRL. One of these patients also reacted to the rubber chemical tetraethylthiuram monosulfide, and another one of these patients revealed a type 1 reaction to NRL, diagnosed by positive reaction to prick test. The other 3 patients with patch test reactions to NRL had negative reactions to prick tests to NRL extracts after 20 minutes. All 4 patients had a positive delayed prick test reaction to NRL. Latex FEIA test result was negative in all 4 patients. The contact eczema healed after elimination of the latex gloves and medical latex devices in all patients. Furthermore, 10 of the 167 patch testing patients (6%) were positive for tetramethylthiuram monosulfide 1%. CONCLUSION: In the present study with 167 patients, the prevalence of type IV hypersensitivity to latex was 2.4%. We recommend that the patch test with NRL as well as with rubber additives should be performed in patients of suspected contact dermatitis caused by rubber products.     

Influence of occupational exposure to latex on the prevalence of sensitization and allergy to latex in a Swiss hospital.

BACKGROUND: Replacement of powdered latex gloves has been recommended in order to prevent the development of latex allergy in health care workers. The conclusion that occupational exposure to latex gloves represents a risk factor for latex allergy is mainly based on studies without exposure controls. Atopy is also thought to be a risk factor for the development of latex allergy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of atopy, sensitization to latex, and symptoms following latex exposure in professionally exposed and nonexposed hospital personnel by means of a cross-sectional study. METHODS: Six hundred randomly sampled individuals working in medicine and surgery departments and in surgery theaters and 300 sex- and age-matched individuals classified as administrative personnel were selected from the employee data base of the Geneva University Hospital. A questionnaire about exposure to latex and symptoms following this exposure was sent to all individuals. Skin prick test reactions and serum IgE to latex as well as standard environmental allergens were determined in both groups. RESULTS: Respiratory and skin (local) symptoms but not objective tests of latex sensitization (positive skin prick test and specific IgE to latex) were significantly associated with occupational exposure to latex (p < 0.001). Only among atopics subjects was 15 years or more of occupational exposure associated with a significantly higher prevalence of local symptoms than among those who were exposed from 1 to 9 years (odds ratio: 3.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.6-6.5). Atopy was significantly associated with sensitization to latex (odds ratio: 10.3; 95% confidence interval: 4.0-26.6) but not with local symptoms. Tests of latex sensitization were both frequently positive, less frequently negative, resulting in low kappa values. CONCLUSION: These results support the current preventive health care recommendation to replace powdered latex gloves. In atopics, increasing years of occupational exposure increase the risk of developing latex allergy. In contrast to questionnaires about local symptoms, skin prick tests and specific serum IgE to latex are of limited value in epidemiologic studies of latex allergy.     

Contact dermatitis due to endotoxin in irradiated latex gloves

This case report describes contact dermatitis of the dyshidrotic type of the hands of a worker subjected to minor trauma. The source of the irritation was linked to bacterial endotoxin in latex gloves. Irradiated sterilized gloves and software may contain significant endotoxin levels because the irradiation does not affect endotoxin itself. The irradiation of the bacteria actually increases endotoxin levels when the bacterial count is elevated. Sweating under these gloves may enhance entry into the skin with subsequent reaction as endotoxin is water soluble.     

Allergy to tea tree oil: retrospective review of 41 cases with positive patch tests over 4.5 years

Tea tree oil use is increasing, with considerable interest in it being a 'natural' antimicrobial. It is found in many commercially available skin and hair care products in Australia. We retrospectively reviewed our patch test data at the Skin and Cancer Foundation Victoria over a 4.5-year period and identified 41 cases of positive reactions to oxidized tea tree oil of 2320 people patch-tested, giving a prevalence of 1.8%. The tea tree oil reaction was deemed relevant to the presenting dermatitis in 17 of 41 (41%) patients. Of those with positive reactions, 27 of 41 (66%) recalled prior use of tea tree oil and eight of 41 (20%) specified prior application of neat (100%) tea tree oil. Tea tree oil allergic contact dermatitis is under-reported in the literature but is sufficiently common in Australia to warrant inclusion of tea tree oil, at a concentration of 10% in petrolatum, in standard patch-test series. Given tea tree oil from freshly opened tea tree oil products elicits no or weak reactions, oxidized tea tree oil should be used for patch testing.