Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in Korea

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is known to be associated with many gastrointestinal diseases including peptic ulcer. In Korea, eradication of H. pylori is recommended for peptic ulcer disease, low grade gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and early gastric cancer. Standard triple therapy using proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy have been the main first-line and second-line therapy for H. pylori in Korea. Although eradication rate of second-line quadruple therapy remains similar to that of the past, the success rate of eradication with triple therapy has decreased with increasing antimicrobial resistance to H. pylori. There is no standard third-line therapy, and some regimens that incorporate levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and rifabutin can be used. New regimens such as sequential or concomitant therapy are suggested as alternative treatment for H. pylori. We need more well designed randomized controlled studies to choose proper treatment for H. pylori infection.     

'Rescue' therapies for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori infection is the main cause of gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer and gastric cancer and should be considered as a major public health issue. According to several international guidelines, first-line therapy for treating H. pylori infection consists of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) with any two antibiotics of amoxicillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole given for 7-14 days. However, even with the recommended treatment regimens, approximately 20% of patients will fail to obtain H. pylori eradication. The proportion of patients with first-line H. pylori therapy failure may be higher in clinical practice and it may increase thanks to diffusion of H. pylori treatment. The recommended second-line therapy is the quadruple regimen composed by tetracycline, metronidazole, bismuth salts and a PPI. However, the efficacy of this regimen is limited by poor patient's compliance due to its side effects, number of tablets per day, and long duration. Moreover, bismuth and metronidazole are not available in all countries. Alternatively, a longer-lasting (i.e. 10-14 days) PPI or RBC triple therapy with two antibiotics has generally been used. In an empirical strategy, the choice of second line depends on the treatment initially used. If a clarithromycin-based regimen was administered in first line, a quadruple regimen or PPI (or RBC) triple therapy with metronidazole and amoxicillin (or tetracycline) should be suggested as a second line. In case of second-line treatment failure, the patient should be evaluated by a case-by-case approach. A susceptibility-guided strategy, if available, is recommended in order to choose the best third-line treatment. Culture can reveal the presence of H. pylori-sensitive strains to clarithromycin (the best effective) or other antimicrobials (such as amoxicillin, metronidazole and tetracycline). Conversely, in an empirical strategy, a third-line not yet used therapy, can reach a high success rate. PPI or RBC, amoxicillin and a new antimicrobial (e.g. rifabutin, levofloxacin or furazolidone) could be used. Several studies have obtained relatively good results with triple therapy combining PPI, rifabutin, and amoxicillin, although a reversible myelotoxicity as leukopenia and thrombocytopenia has been described. Preliminary good results were also achieved with triples PPI regimens combining levofloxacin and amoxicillin without important adverse effects. Furazolidone has also shown efficacy for H. pylori eradication, although untoward reactions could limit its use, especially when high doses are employed. Finally, in more than one H. pylori treatment failure, non-antimicrobial add-on medications (such as lactoferrin, probiotics and others) could be used with the aim either to improve the eradication rate or to minimize side effects.     

The efficacy of levofloxacin based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The failure rates of first and second line therapies of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication range from 15 to 20%. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin based triple therapy compared with standard triple or quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication in Korea. METHODS: We enrolled two hundred and sixty seven patients with presence of H. pylori infection. One hundred and forty-one patients were treated with levofloxacin based triple therapy (LAP; levofloxacin, amoxicillin, proton pump inhibitor; PPI), and 126 patients were treated with standard triple therapy (CAP; clarithromycin, amoxicillin, PPI). We retreated the patients who had failed in H. pylori eradication with standard quadruple second-line therapy (MTPB; metronidazole, tetracycline, PPI, bismuth subcitrate) or levofloxacin based therapy (LAP or LCP; levofloxacin, clarithromycin, PPI). RESULTS: In first line therapy of H. pylori eradication, the eradication rates of levofloxacin based triple therapy and standard triple therapy were 69.8% and 74.0% respectively (p=0.52). In second-line therapy, the eradication rate of levofloxacin based triple therapy and standard quadruple therapy were 62.5% and 40.0% respectively (p=0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin based triple therapy is effective as standard regimen to eradicate H. pylori infection and is useful for an alternative rescue therapy as well.     

Current understandings of Helicobacter pylori, peptic ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux disease

H. pylori infection is a major pathogen inducing gastric mucosal inflammation and causing dysregulation of normal acid inhibitory regulatory mechanisms. The overall effect on gastric acid secretion is dependent on the location and severity of inflammation. Eradication results in healing of gastric mucosal inflammation, healing of peptic ulcers, prevention of new peptic ulcers, prevention or reduction in gastric cancer risk and in transmission of the infection. Neither H. pylori infection nor H. pylori eradication causes gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). H. pylori eradication also does not impede anti-secretory drug therapy of GERD. Misunderstandings of the negative association between H. pylori infection and GERD and/or Barrett's esophagus and misuse of the epidemiologic concept of 'protection' led to considerable confusion and likely resulted in some patients receiving poor care. Current evidence is consistent with the notion that H. pylori should be eliminated whenever the organism is found. However, H. pylori infection has become increasing difficult to cure in part due to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. In Western countries, triple therapy consisting of a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin no longer achieves adequate eradication rates and will soon need to be abandoned. When used, legacy triple therapy should be given for 14 days. Fluorquinolones may temporarily be useful: 10-14 day duration is superior to 7 days. However, worldwide resistance is rapidly increasing. Other potential replacement therapies and strategies are discussed including sequential therapies, high-dose proton pump inhibitor plus amoxicillin, and new quadruple therapies.     

How to proceed in Helicobacter pylori-positive chronic gastritis refractory to first- and second-line eradication therapy

Helicobacter pylori is a widespread disease causing most of the peptic ulcer diseases and low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoreticular tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Moreover, H. pylori is a proven environmental risk factor for gastric carcinoma and it has been recognized as a type 1 carcinogen factor. A combination of drugs has been proposed, using a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline to treat the infection. Since 1996, according to the European guidelines, the first-line approach using PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin or metronidazole has been suggested. Seven days of quadruple therapy with PPI (or ranitidine), tetracycline, bismuth salts and metronidazole has been reserved as second-line treatment. To improve the eradication rate of the triple therapy, a different combination of the available antibiotics has been proposed, consisting of a 10-day sequential regimen. A second-line levofloxacin-amoxicillin-based triple therapy given for 10 days has been proposed, obtaining a high eradication rate, suggesting this regimen to be a suitable retreatment option in eradication failure. A third-line treatment with rifabutin-based regimen has been proposed.     

Institutional difference of antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori strains in Korea

GOALS: This study was performed to evaluate whether the prevalence rates of primary antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori isolates could be different between 2 institutions, which are located in the different areas in Korea, and to evaluate the effect of antibiotic resistance on the eradication rate of H. pylori. STUDY: H. pylori were isolated from gastric mucosal biopsy specimens obtained from 113 Koreans, who did not have any eradication history. The susceptibilities of the H. pylori isolates to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin were examined according to the agar dilution method by 1 technician. RESULTS: All of these patients were treated with the same regimen, proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin triple therapy. There was a statistical difference in resistance to metronidazole, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin among 6 antibiotics between 2 institutions located in Seoul and Gyeonggi province. The rates of eradication were 94.2% for the clarithromycin and amoxicillin-susceptible strains, and 42.8% for the amoxicillin-susceptible and clarithromycin-resistant strains. In contrast, eradication rate was 100% for the amoxicillin-resistant strains. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that there is institutional difference of antibiotic resistance of H. pylori, explaining the institutional difference of eradication rate of H. pylori. The resistance to clarithromycin seems to be an important determinant for the eradication by proton pump inhibitor triple therapy but resistance to amoxicillin does not have any effect.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori is a serious, chronic, progressive, and transmissible infection associated with a significant morbidity and mortality, which alone emphasizes the priority of developing adequate prophylactic or therapeutic measures. What was previously termed "asymptomatic H. pylori infection" is now recognized as a latent infection, and it is now accepted that the presence of an H. pylori infection is an indication for eradication therapy. Successful cure of H. pylori infection requires 2 or more antibiotics. Antibiotic resistance is the major impediment of cure. The ideal duration of therapy is unknown, but in general, 1 week therapy is less effective than longer durations. Compliance is important for the success of treatment; therefore, the favored regimen should have the least side effects. At present, a proton pump inhibitor (or ranitidine bismuth citrate)-clarithromycin triple therapy with either amoxicillin or metronidazole, for at least 10 days is considered first-line therapy. The alternative is quadruple therapy containing a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, tetracycline, and a higher dose of metronidazole. Quadruple therapy is the best choice after failure of proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin triple therapy. Confirmation of successful therapy with a urea breath test or a stool antigen test is now the standard of practice.     

New guidelines for Helicobacter pylori: applying them to your practice

The most recent European Helicobacter Study Group consensus recommendations are a state-of-the-art evaluation of the literature on Helicobacter pylori. The traditional indications for H. pylori eradication remain the major indications for eradication therapy in 2007. A role for H. pylori infection has been demonstrated in disease states that were not traditionally thought to be related to H. pylori infection, namely iron deficiency anemia unexplained by other causes, and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Office-based H. pylori tests are no longer recommended by the consensus group because of their poor sensitivity and specificity in clinical practice. The treatment of H. pylori infection has not changed significantly in the last decade, though promising alternatives are being studied. At present the treatment regimen recommended for world-wide use is triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin. Culture and antimicrobial sensitivity testing are recommended in areas where resistance rates to clarithromycin are high.     

Effectiveness of 10 day-sequential therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Korea

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Antibiotic resistance and poor compliance are the main causes of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication failure. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy is the most preferred regimen in clinical practice. However, a critical fall in the H. pylori eradication rate has been observed in the recent years. A novel 10 day-sequential therapy consists of five days of dual therapy followed by five days of triple therapy regimen has recently been described. We aimed to evaluate whether 10 day-sequential therapy eradicated H. pylori infection better than the PPI-based triple therapy in Korea. METHODS: 158 patients with proven H. pylori infection were randomized to receive either 10 day-sequential therapy (20 mg of omeprazole, 1.0 g of amoxicillin, each administered twice daily for the first 5 days, followed by 20 mg of omeprazole, 500 mg of clarithromycin, 500 mg of metronidazole, each administered twice daily for the remaining 5 days) or PPI-based triple therapy (20 mg of omeprazole, 1.0 g of amoxicillin, 500 mg of clarithromycin, each administered twice daily for 1 week). Outcome of eradication therapy was assessed 8 weeks after the cessation of treatment. RESULTS: Eradication rates of 10 day-sequential therapy and PPI-based triple therapy were 77.9% (60/77) and 71.6% (58/81) by intention to treat analysis, respectively (p=0.361). By per protocol analysis, eradication rates of 10 day-sequential therapy and triple therapy were 85.7% (60/70) and 76.6% (58/76), respectively (p=0.150). There were no significant differences in adverse event rates and treatment compliance between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 10 day-sequential therapy regimen failed to achieve significantly higher eradication rates than PPI-based triple therapy.     

Evaluation of triple and quadruple Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies in Iranian children: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials in children concerning Helicobacter pylori eradication treatments are scarce. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy using PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin in Iranian children. We also evaluated the efficacy of quadruple therapy with PPI, metronidazole, amoxicilin and bismuth citrate in Iranian children. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial performed in Emam Khomeini Hospital between 2003 and 2004. Patients with confirmed H. pylori infection by histology were divided into two groups in a randomized 1:1 scheme: the triple regimen group (omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin for 10 days) and the quadruple regimen group (omeprazole, amoxicillin, metronidazole and bismuth citrate for 10 days). The eradication was assessed by the C-urea breath test 4 weeks after the end of treatment and analyzed by per-protocol and intention-to-treat approaches. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two patients (mean age 12.36+/-3.06 years) were entered into the study. Only 100 patients completed the study (50 patients in each regimen group). The eradication rates by triple therapy were 92% and 75.5% for the "per-protocol" and "intention-to-treat" approaches, respectively. In the quadruple regimen group, the eradication rates were 84% by the per-protocol approach and 68.8% in the intention-to-treat approach. Symptom responses to therapy were reported in all patients with successful eradication (88% of all patients). CONCLUSION: With regard to recent recommendations, we also suggest PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin triple therapy as a first-line eradication treatment, and quadruple therapies as a second-line option, in Iranian children.     

Comparison of short- and long-term treatment protocols and the results of second-line quadruple therapy in children with <Emphasis Type="Italic">Helicobacter pylori</Emphasis> infection

BACKGROUND: Research regarding the optimal therapeutic approach to Helicobacter pylori infection in children is ongoing. There is no consensus as to duration of treatment or second-line therapy. The purpose of this study was compare the efficacy of 7-day and 14-day triple therapies and report the results of second-line quadruple therapy in children. METHODS: A total of 275 consecutive H. pylori-infected patients were enrolled into two groups. Group 1 (n = 180) received triple therapy with 14 days of amoxicillin and clarithromycin and 21 days of proton pump inhibitor. Group 2 (n = 95) received triple therapy including 7 days of amoxicillin and clarithromycin with 21 days of proton pump inhibitor. Subsequently, 89 patients not responding to the triple therapies received quadruple therapy comprising omeprazole (14 days), bismuth subcitrate (7 days), doxycycline (7 days), and metronidazole (7 days). Eradication was evaluated by 13C-urea breath test. RESULTS: The per-protocol eradication rates in groups 1 and 2 were 60.5% and 55.8%, respectively (P = 0.44). In the second interview with 227 patients, severe symptoms were reported to have disappeared in 59% and decreased notably in 34.8%. Helicobacter pylori was eradicated in 66.7% of patients at the end of the quadruple therapy. In the third interview with 75 patients, severe symptoms had decreased in 38.6% and disappeared in 56%. CONCLUSIONS: The different duration of the two treatment regimens had no impact on eradication rates. Furthermore, quadruple therapy was necessary to achieve H. pylori eradication after triple therapy. However, the eradication rate with quadruple therapy was still insufficient. Consequently, a new therapeutic approach to H. pylori infection in children is needed.     

Third-line rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

H pylori gastric infection is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases worldwide. The discovery that most upper gastrointestinal diseases are related to H pylori infection and therefore can be treated with antibiotics is an important medical advance. Currently, a first-line triple therapy based on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus two antibiotics (clarithromycin and amo-xicillin or nitroimidazole) is recommended by all consensus conferences and guidelines. Even with the correct use of this drug combination, infection can not be eradicated in up to 23% of patients. Therefore, several second line therapies have been recommended. A 7 d quadruple therapy based on PPI, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole is the more frequently accepted. However, with second-line therapy, bacterial eradication may fail in up to 40% of cases. When H pylori eradication is strictly indicated the choice of further treatment is controversial. Currently, a standard third-line therapy is lacking and various protocols have been proposed. Even after two consecutive failures, the most recent literature data have demonstrated that H pylori eradication can be achieved in almost all patients, even when antibiotic susceptibility is not tested. Different possibilities of empirical treatment exist and the available third-line strategies are herein reviewed.     

Comparison of the effectiveness of quadruple salvage regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection according to the duration of treatment]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: At present, triple therapy schemes are recommended by national and international consensus conferences for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. However, even with the most effective current treatment regimens, about 10-20% of patients fail to eradicate H. pylori, necessitating alternative strategy to eradicate H. pylori in primary treatment failure. Therefore, we performed this study to evaluate the efficacy of quadruple therapy and to compare 1 and 2-week quadruple regimen as a second-line therapy. METHODS: The hospital records of 155 patients who failed to the standard triple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, clarithromycin) were reviewed retrospectively, and divided the 1 or 2 weeks OBMT regimen (omeprazole 20 mg bid, bismuth salt 120 mg qid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, tetracycline 500 mg qid). Presence of H. pylori infection and side-effects of the treatment regimen were assessed 4 weeks after the cessation of treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and eight male and 47 female (mean age, 52.2+/-15.4) patients were enrolled. The overall eradication rate of H. pylori with quadruple therapy was 83.9% and the eradication rate was similar between 1 and 2 weeks of OBMT regimen (76.8% in OBMT 1 week, 87.9% in OBMT 2 weeks, respectively p=0.110). CONCLUSIONS: Quadruple therapy is an effective salvage regimen for H. pylori eradication after the failure of standard triple therapy. One week quadruple therapy is not significantly different from 2-weeks regimen as the second-line option for H. pylori eradication.     

High-dose rabeprazole/amoxicillin therapy as the second-line regimen after failure to eradicate H. pylori by triple therapy with the usual doses of a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxicillin

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Some patients are refractory to the usual triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori, consisting of a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin, so there needs to be an alternative strategy for retreatment after failure to eradicate the infection. METHODOLOGY: The study group comprised 17 H. pylori-positive patients who had failed to clear H. pylori infection after 1 week of treatment with usual doses of proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin. The sensitivity of H. pylori to clarithromycin and amoxicillin, and the CYP2C19 genotype status of each patient were determined and treatment with rabeprazole (10 mg qid) and amoxicillin (500 mg qid) for 2 weeks was started. RESULTS: Eleven patients were infected with a clarithromycin-resistant strain of H. pylori. Twelve patients had the homozygous extensive metabolizer genotype, 5 had the heterozygous extensive metabolizer genotype and there were none with the poor metabolizer genotype of CYP2C19. All patients were successfully cleared of their H. pylori infection without any adverse effects, irrespective of CYP2C19 genotype status (100%, 95% confidence interval: 76-100%). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose dual therapy with rabeprazole (10 mg qid) and amoxicillin (500 mg qid) for 2 weeks appears useful treatment strategy after failure of eradication of H. pylori by the usual triple proton pump inhibitor/amoxicillin/clarithromycin therapy.     

Ranitidine bismuth citrate.

Recognition of the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastroduodenal disease has increased greatly in recent years. To avoid complications of H pylori infection, such as the development of recurrent duodenal and gastric ulcers, effective therapies are required for eradication of the infection. This article reviews ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC), a novel complex of ranitidine, bismuth and citrate, which was developed specifically for the purpose of eradicating H pylori. Dual therapy with RBC in combination with clarithromycin for 14 days yields eradication rates of 76%. Triple therapy bid for one week with a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or a nitroimidazole (tinidazole or metronidazole) is advocated as the treatment of choice for H pylori eradication. Analogous regimens with RBC in place of proton pump inhibitors show effective eradication rates in comparative studies and with pooled data. RBC, used alone or in combination with other antibiotics, appears to be a safe and effective drug for the treatment of H pylori infection. Bismuth levels do not appear to rise to toxic levels.     

Recent success of pantoprazole -or lansoprazole- based clarithromycin plus amoxicillin treatment in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There are some reports showing that resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) to clarithromycin has increased in recent years. We aimed to investigate the current success of a most popular first-line eradication regimen by using two different proton pump inhibitors: lansoprazole and pantoprazole. METHODS: Ninety patients with H. pylori-positive functional dyspepsia were randomized to receive pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d. or lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. in addition to amoxicillin 1,000 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 14 days in a multicenter study. H. pylori infection was determined by histological examination and a rapid urease test. A follow-up endoscopy was performed to assess the H. pylori eradication six weeks after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients completed the study protocol properly. The H. pylori eradication rates according to per protocol analysis were 70% in group pantoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin (28/40) and 69.2% in group pantoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin (27/39). The eradication rates according to intention to treat analysis were 62.2% and 60% in lansoprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, pantoprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin groups, respectively. The eradication rates were similar in both protocols (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The most popular first-line eradication protocols of H. pylori achieved only a moderate success in the current study. Alternative therapy options are needed instead of clarithromycin-based triple treatment for eradication of H. pylori. The choice of proton pump inhibitor is not important in the eradication rate of H. pylori.     

Duration of the metronidazole-containing regimen for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in northern Japan

Metronidazole is often used to eradicate clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori. The aim of this study was to determine the appropriate duration of metronidazole-containing treatment for the eradication of H. pylori infection in northern Japan. We enrolled 83 H. pylori-positive patients in whom first-line triple therapy consisting of a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin had failed. Prior to the second-line therapy, patients underwent endoscopy to obtain H. pylori strains to test the susceptibility to antibiotics. Patients were administered lansoprazole (30 mg b.d.), amoxicillin (750 mg b.d.) and metronidazole (250 mg b.d.) for 5 or 7 days, and the treatment results were tested by (13)C-UBT. None of the isolated H. pylori strains was amoxicillin- or metronidazole-resistant. All the patients completed the regimen without major adverse effects. The eradication rate was 95.1% (39/41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 83.5-99.4%) in the 41 patients who were treated for 5 days and 95.2% (40/42; 95% CI, 83.8-99.4%) in the 42 patients treated for 7 days. The results suggest that 5 days could be a sufficient duration for triple therapy of lansoprazole, amoxicillin and metronidazole as a second-line H. pylori eradication therapy in areas where metronidazole-resistant strains are rare.     

Ten-day sequential therapy is more effective than proton pump inhibitor-based therapy in Korea: a prospective, randomized study

Background and Aims: The eradication rate of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)‐based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has decreased, mainly due to increasing antibiotic resistance, especially against clarithromycin. It has been reported that a 10‐day sequential strategy can produce good outcomes. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of sequential therapy as the first‐line treatment for the eradication of H. pylori in Korea. Methods: A total of 116 patients with proven H. pylori infection received 10‐day sequential therapy (20 mg rabeprazole and 1 g amoxicillin, twice daily for the first 5 days, followed by 20 mg rabeprazole, 500 mg clarithromycin, and 500 mg metronidazole, twice daily for the remaining 5 days); 130 patients received 7‐day triple therapy (20 mg rabeprazole, 500 mg clarithromycin, and 1 g amoxicillin, twice daily for 7 days). Eradication was evaluated by the ¹³C‐urea breath test, 4 weeks after the completion of treatment. Compliance and adverse events were assessed. Results: The eradication rates of 10‐day sequential therapy and PPI‐based triple therapy were 79.3% (92/116) and 63% (82/130) by intention‐to‐treat analysis, respectively (P = 0.005), and 81.9% (91/111) and 64.5% (82/127) by per protocol analysis, respectively (P = 0.003). Mild adverse events occurred in both therapy groups (27.5% vs 23.8%), but both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion: The eradication rate of the 10‐day sequential therapy regimen was significantly higher than that of PPI‐based triple therapy in the Korean population. Ten‐day sequential therapy might be effective as a first‐line treatment for H. pylori infection in Korea.     

Efficacy of rifabutin-based triple therapy in Helicobacter pylori infected patients after two standard treatments

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Even with the current most effective treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection, a considerable number of patients will be resistant to eradication. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the H. pylori eradication rate in patients resistant to standard therapies when treated with a triple therapy of pantoprazole, rifabutin and amoxicillin. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection resistant to two previous treatment regimens were treated with pantoprazole, rifabutin and amoxicillin for 10 days. The persistence or eradication of H. pylori was determined by a 13C-urea breath test performed 4 weeks after the treatment. RESULTS: Per protocol eradication was achieved in 62.2% of patients and the intention-to-treat eradication was 60.8%. Only two patients were excluded for adverse events related to the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The eradication rate is acceptable as a third-line therapy, particularly in centers with high cure rate for first line therapy. Another important value of this study is the good tolerance for the treatment observed in our patients. It is possible that rifabutin-based triple therapy may be of use in hospital centers that do not have disposable culture and susceptibility methods against H. pylori.     

Treating H. pylori shorter than one week--a real future perspective?

BACKGROUND: We assessed the current impact of H. pylori eradication therapies with a short (4-6 days) and very short (< or = 3 days) duration of antibiotic treatment because of possible advantages in terms of costs and side effects over standard one-week triple therapy. METHODS: The literature was reviewed and 35 studies analyzed, leading to a total of 51 treatment regimens with 2177 patients. RESULTS: Cumulative per-protocol H. pylori eradication rates were 61.3%, 75.2%, and 79.4% for dual, triple and quadruple therapies, respectively. Dual therapy was inferior to triple and quadruple regimens (p < 0.001), while the difference between triple and quadruple therapy did not reach statistical significance. Subgroup analysis of all triple therapies containing macrolides and imidazoles resulted in a success rate of 84.1% (vs. 62.1% for other triple therapies, p < 0.0001). Decreasing the treatment duration to 3 days or less resulted in a loss of efficacy for both bismuth-based quadruple therapy with tetracycline and imidazoles (90.3% vs. 65%, p < 0.0001) and for triple therapy with macrolides and amoxicillin (70.3% vs. 31.2%, p < 0.0001). This does not hold true for triple therapy containing imidazoles and macrolides (84.5% vs. 83.6%, not significant). Regardless of the duration of therapy quadruple regimes with macrolides/imidazoles/amoxicillin achieved an eradication rate of 91.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data suggest that the short-term combination of proton pump inhibitors with 2 antibiotics (macrolides and imidazoles) with/without amoxicillin may be as effective as standard one week triple therapies, even for treatment durations of 3 days or less. The combination of proton pump inhibitors with bismuth, tetracycline and imidazoles appears to be equally effective, if given for at least 4 days.