Does gender influence resource utilization in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to examine if gender influences duration of tracheal intubation, blood transfusion needs, intensive care unit length of stay (ICULOS), postoperative length of stay (PLOS), and total length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing OPCAB surgery. SETTING: University teaching hospital. Tertiary care referral center for cardiac surgery. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seventy-two consecutive male and female patients undergoing OPCAB surgery. There were 110 women and 262 men. INTERVENTIONS: None.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Gender, duration of tracheal intubation, units of blood transfused, ICULOS, PLOS, and LOS were collected from the records of patients undergoing OPCAB surgery at the authors' institution over a period of 16 months. There were a total of 372 patients: 110 women and 262 men. Median intubation time was 4.5 hours for women and 4.0 hours for men (p = 0.749); 59.1% of women received red blood cells versus 31.3% of men (p < 0.001). Median ICU LOS was 1 day for women and 1 day for men (p = 0.597) Median PLOS was 4 days for women and 4 days for men. Median LOS was 8 days for women and 6 days for men (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Female sex was a predictor of increased blood transfusion and longer PLOS and LOS in patients undergoing OPCAB surgery. The study implies that female sex does not predict increased duration of tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation and ICULOS in this group of patients. Females undergoing OPCAB surgery require increased resource utilization as measured by increases in blood transfusion, PLOS, and LOS.     

体外循环与非体外循环下冠脉搭桥术患者术中血液动力学的比较

目的比较体外循环(CPB)与非CPB下冠脉搭桥术患者术中血液动力学的变化。方法同期行CPB下冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)与非CPB下冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)患者各70例,分别为CABG组和OPCAB组,分别在麻醉诱导后手术开始前(术前)和术毕用Swan-Ganz导管监测血液动力学指标。结果与术前比较,两组术毕心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、肺动脉平均压(PAMP)、肺毛细血管嵌压(PAWP)、中心静脉压(CVP)及左室作功指数(LVSWI)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),心输出量(CO)、心脏指数(CI)均升高;OPCAB组术毕心搏指数(SVI)升高,体循环阻力指数(SVRI)、肺循环阻力指数(PVRI)降低(P<0.05),CABG组术毕SVI、SVRI、PVRI差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与CABG组比较,OPCAB组术毕SVRI、PVRI降低(P<0.05)。结论两组患者术后心功能均得到了改善,OPCAB 组在改善心功能、降低体、肺循环阻力方面,优于CABG组。     

Intraoperative assessment and quantification of coronary artery graft patency performed on or off cardiopulmonary bypass

Within the last 10 years, the incorporation of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) into many surgical practices has grown. OPCAB requires the surgeon to operate on a beating heart, and it is generally accepted that OPCAB procedures are more technically demanding. Concerns of possible incomplete revascularizations and decreased graft patency have been noted in the literature. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare on-pump and off-pump intraoperative coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) flow parameters. Intraoperative flow studies conducted with the Butterfly (Medi-Stim Norge AS, Oslo, Norway) flow meter were analyzed retrospectively on 74 patients. Comparisons were completed between patient groups having had their revascularizations performed on or off cardiopulmonary bypass. Our study revealed significant differences in the mean flow rate through saphenous vein grafts (SVG) to the obtuse marginal artery (OM; p = .014), to the diagonal artery (Diag; p = .003), to the right coronary artery (RCA; p = .001), and to the posterior descending artery (PDA; p = .001). Total blood product use showed significantly increased use of both platelets (PLTs) and cryoprecipitate (Cryo) in the on-pump group (p = .027 and .012, respectively). No differences were found for transfusions of red blood cells (RBCs) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Additional findings showed a significantly decreased median length of stay (LOS) for the off-pump group. The on-pump patients had a median hospital stay of 7 days (range, 4-24 days), whereas the off-pump patients had a median stay of 6 days (range, 3-22 days; p = .049). Although we were able to show some significance in the mean flow data supporting increased graft flow with the on-pump technique, we were not able to show an overall increase in all recorded flow characteristics to support one method over another.     

体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术病人住院费用的对比研究

目的对比研究体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术（CCABG）与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术（OPCAB）病人住院费用的差别。方法将679例行冠状动脉旁路移植术（CABG）病人分为CCABG组与OPCAB组，对比两组住院费用及各项分类住院费用的差别，包括西药费、化验费、检查费、治疗费、手术费、麻醉费、血费、材料费、护理费、膳食费及其他费用。结果CCABG组合计住院费用高于OPCAB组，但差异无统计学意义；在分类费用中，CCABG组的西药费、手术费、血费、床位费及护理费高于OPCAB组，而OPCAB组材料费高于CCABG组，差异有统计学意义；两组间化验费、检查费、治疗费、麻醉费、膳食费及其他费用差异无统计学意义。结论OPCAB组合计住院费用与CCABG组相仿，而OPCAB组的材料费用显著高于CCABG组。     

Change in the volume of extra cellular fluid in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); comparison between off-pump and on-pump CABG

During the perioperative period for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) and on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (on-pump CABG), the volume of extra cellular fluid (ECF) was measured. The subjects were elective adult coronary artery bypass surgery cases, consisting of 13 OPCAB cases and 7 on-pump CABG cases. The ECF volume was measured the day before surgery, immediately after surgery, and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours after surgery, with a bioimpedance analyzer (XITRON 4000 C). ECF volume variation was defined as the difference from the preoperative value divided by body weight, and was expressed in %BW. At the same time, respiratory-index and leukocyte count were measured. The maximum postoperative ECF volume was 3.13 +/- 2.6 %BW in the OPCAB group and 5.36 +/- 2.0 %BW in the on-pump CABG group, that is, significantly higher in the on-pump CABG group. The ECF volume started to increase in the on-pump CABG group immediately after surgery (4.38 +/- 1.8 %BW in the on-pump CABG group and 2.07 +/- 2.4 %BW in the OPCAB group), reaching its peak 6 hours after surgery in the on-pump CABG group and 4 hours after surgery in the OPCAB group. Thereafter, the volume gradually decreased, and 48 hours after surgery the volume decreased in the OPCAB group to 0.064 +/- 1.5 %BW, or to about the same value as the preoperative value, whereas in the on-pump CABG group the volume remained high: 1.9 +/- 2.9 % BW. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the change in respiratory-index. The leukocyte count remained significantly higher in the on-pump CABG group. The ECF volume was measured by the bioimpedance measuring method. This is a useful method of measuring the volume non-invasively and continuously. In the OPCAB group, the increase in postoperative ECF volume was less, and recovery to the preoperative level was faster than in the on-pump CABG group.     

Coronary artery bypass in patients 80 years and over: is off-pump the operation of choice?

BACKGROUND: Octogenarians are at increased risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass. In this study we compared our experience with patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass (CAB) and those undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) to assess outcomes. METHODS: We used hospital database analysis in patients 80 years and older who underwent nonemergent coronary artery bypass with (N = 169) and without (N = 60) cardiopulmonary bypass from January 1999 through June 2001. RESULTS: Both groups were at increased perioperative risk based on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk model (7.7% OPCAB vs 5.8% CAB, p = 0.03). There were no operative deaths in the OPCAB group but there were eight (4.7%) in the CAB group (p = NS). Perioperative stroke (0% OPCAB vs 7.1% CAB, p = 0.04), prolonged ventilation (1.7% OPCAB vs 11.8% CAB, p = 0.02), and transfusion rate (33% OPCAB vs 70.4% CAB, p < 0.001) were all lower in the OPCAB group. A shorter hospital stay (6.3 days OPCAB vs 11.5 days CAB, p < 0.001) resulted in lower hospital cost in the OPCAB group ($9,363 OPCAB vs $12,312 CAB, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients was associated with fewer complications, a shorter hospital stay, and lower hospital cost. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting may be the operation of choice for octogenarians requiring surgical myocardial revascularization.     

Does multi-vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduce post operative morbidity compared to on-pump CABG?

Background Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may contribute to the complications and it is assumed that eliminating cardiopulmonary bypass has the potential of reducing post operative morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The study was carried out to compare mortality and morbidity in the off-pump and on-pump CABG groups. Methods We prospectively analysed 200 patients undergoing CABG. Group A consists of 100 patients underwent multi-vessel off-pump CABG and group B consists of 100 patients underwent CABG with CPB. The incidence of complications (mortality, re-exploration for bleeding, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, neurological events, new onset renal failure (s. creatinine>1.6 mg/dL) pulmonary complications, length of ICU stay and hospital stay were recorded, analysed and compared. Results OPCAB patients received 2.73±0.61 grafts/patient and on-pump CABG patients received 3.39±0.75 grafts/patient (p value<0.00001). There was no significant statistical difference in mortality, incidence of stroke between OPCAB and CABG with CPB patients. Length of ICU stay was 32.84±4.22 vs 44.85±7.18 hrs (p value<0.00001) and hospital stay was 6.52±0.69 vs 7.94±0.92 days (p value<0.00001) between group A and group B respectively. Incidence of atrial fibrillation was less in OPCAB group 7% vs 12% although it was statistically not significant (p value 0.33). It was observed in our study that there was no significant deference in worsening of existing renal failure between on-pump CABG and OPCAB 6% vs 2% (P value 0.28). Blood utilization was significantly less in OPCAB group (p value<0.001). Conclusion There was no statistically significant difference in terms of mortality, incidence of stroke and new onset renal failure in both groups. But there was lesser incidence of post operative atrial fibrillation, worsening of existing renal failure in off-pump group though statistically not significant. There was significant reduction in blood utilization, length of ICU and hospital stay in OPCAB group.     

Beating heart versus conventional single-vessel reoperative coronary artery bypass

BACKGROUND: Reoperative (redo) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump) is associated with a higher morbidity and mortality than first-time CABG. It is unknown, however, whether CABG without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump) may yield an improved clinical outcome over conventional on-pump redo CABG. METHODS: We compared the perioperative outcomes of patients with single-vessel disease who underwent on-pump (n = 41) versus off-pump (n = 91) redo CABG between April 1992 and July 1999. The two groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics and risk stratification: mean Parsonnet scores were 26 +/- 9 for on-pump versus 24 +/- 8 for off-pump patients (p = nonsignificant). RESULTS: On-pump redo patients had a higher rate of postoperative transfusions (58% on-pump versus 27% off-pump, p = 0.001), prolonged ventilatory support (17% on-pump versus 4% off-pump, p = 0.03), and a higher rate of postoperative atrial fibrillation (29% on-pump versus 14% off-pump, p = 0.04). On-pump redo CABG was also associated with prolonged postoperative length of stay (8 +/- 4 days on-pump versus 5 +/- 2 days off-pump, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in on-pump than in off-pump patients (10% versus 1%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Single-vessel off-pump redo CABG can be performed safely with a lower operative morbidity and mortality than on-pump CABG and an abbreviated hospital stay compared with conventional on-pump redo CABG.     

Off-pump multivessel coronary artery surgery in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, which may be more marked in high-risk patients. We evaluated our results of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) in high-risk patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and compared them with results in similar patients who underwent operation on cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: A total of 1,075 patients who underwent OPCAB between October 1996 and June 2001 and who had one or more of the following risk factors were included in the study: poor left ventricular function (EF < or = 30%), advanced age (> 70 years), left main stenosis, acute myocardial infarction, and redo coronary artery surgery. These patients were compared with 2,312 similar patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass during the same period. Preoperative risk factors, intraoperative variables, and postoperative results were analyzed and compared between two groups. RESULTS: The average number of grafts was 3.0 +/- 0.4 and 3.2 +/- 0.3 in the off-pump (OPCAB) and on-pump (CCAB) groups, respectively. Hospital mortality was 3.2% and 4.5% in OPCAB and CCAB groups respectively (p = 0.109). Perioperative myocardial infarction, requirement of inotropic agents, stroke, and renal dysfunction were comparable in two groups. Intubation time (19 +/- 5 vs 24 +/- 6 hours, p < 0.001), mean blood loss (362 +/- 53 vs 580 +/- 66 mL, p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (14.3 vs 19.7%, p < 0.001), and prolonged ventilation (4.6 vs 7.6%, p = 0.002) were less in OPCAB group. Intensive care unit stay (20 +/- 8 hours) and hospital stay (6 +/- 3 days) were significantly less in the OPCAB group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery surgery can be safely performed in high-risk patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Operative mortality is comparable to that associated with on-pump surgery, and avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with reduced postoperative morbidity in these patients.     

Symmetry aortic connector devices and acute renal injury: a comparison of renal dysfunction after three different aortocoronary bypass surgery techniques

Although the pathogenesis of acute renal injury after cardiac surgery is multifactorial, atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta and embolic burden are strong independent predictors. Use of the Symmetry aortic connector device (ACD) for proximal anastomosis of coronary grafts may reduce ascending aortic atheroembolism. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery performed using an ACD is associated with less postoperative renal dysfunction compared with conventional OPCAB or on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Three-thousand-three-hundred consecutive patients undergoing non-emergent aortocoronary bypass surgery were retrospectively divided into three groups by surgical procedure; Group A: OPCAB with ACD (n = 124), Group B: standard OPCAB (n = 313), Group C: on-pump CABG (n = 2863). Postoperative peak fractional change in creatinine compared with baseline was used as a measure of renal outcome. Multivariable analysis did not identify ACD use as an independent predictor of postoperative peak fractional change in creatinine (P = 0.71), although the relationships of several known renal risk factors with postoperative peak fractional change in creatinine were confirmed. We could not find evidence that OPCAB surgery using ACDs reduces acute renal injury compared with standard OPCAB or CABG surgery.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass

OBJECTIVES: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on the beating heart has become popular procedure in cardiac surgery and its initial results appeared favorable. We report our early and mid-term results of off-pump CABG performed at Shin-Tokyo Hospital. METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing off-pump or conventional on-pump CABG from September 1, 1996, to August 31, 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent off-pump CABG were further classified into 2 groups; MIDCAB (Off-pump CABG for single vessel revascularization via a small skin incision) and OPCAB (off-pump CABG mainly approached via midline sternotomy) group. Their preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Among a total of 995 cases of CABG, 194 cases were off-pump CABG (male/female 142/52, mean age 66.9). The mean number of distal anastomoses in off-pump CABG was 1.9 +/- 0.9 (1.0 +/- 0.0 in MIDCAB and 2.3 +/- 0.7 in OPCAB), which was significantly fewer than in on-pump CABG (3.6 +/- 1.1), with p < 0.0001. Intubation time (5.3 +/- 5.7 hours in off-pump CABG vs 13.1 +/- 24.2 hours in on-pump CABG), ICU stay (1.7 +/- 1.1 vs 3.2 +/- 3.0 days), and postoperative hospital stay (14.0 +/- 7.9 vs 18.1 +/- 12.1 days) in off-pump CABG were significantly shorter than in on-pump CABG (p < 0.0001). In the off-pump CABG group, there were no in-hospital deaths and 14 major complications, fewer than in on-pump CABG (8 hospital deaths and 114 major complications). Postoperative angiography before hospital discharge was conducted in 80 patients (41.2%) and showed 2 occlusions, giving a graft patency rate of 98.6% in the off-pump group. During follow-up (0.9 +/- 0.6 year) period, there were 5 non-cardiac deaths and 20 cardiac events in the off-pump group. The actuarial survival rate at 36 months was 94.6% for off-pump CABG, showing no significant difference from the rate for conventional CABG patients (95.2% at 36 month, p = NS) The event-free rate was 84.0% at 36 months in off-pump CABG patients; however, which was less favorable than on-pump CABG patients (88.0% at 36 months, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both in-hospital and mid-term results for off-pump CABG patients were acceptable. Isolated CABG can thus be safely performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. Advances in coronary stabilization have contributed to these improved results. The observed long-term cardiac events may be related to incomplete revascularization.     

Off-pump versus on-pump myocardial revascularization in low-risk patients with one or two vessel disease: perioperative results in a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: To evaluate hospital mortality and morbidity after myocardial revascularization in a prospective and multicenter study, comparing on-pump versus off-pump in a special subset of patients with lesions in the left descending artery, alone or associated with the right coronary artery. METHODS: A multicenter prospective randomized study was performed. One hundred and sixty selected low-risk patients were enrolled; 80 patients were operated on-pump (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], group I) and 80 patients were operated off-pump (off-pump coronary artery bypass [OPCAB], group II). One hundred and five were male and ages ranged from 39 to 70 years old; mean 58.81 +/- 9.31 and median 59. Preoperative clinical characteristics were similar in both groups; only previous myocardial infarction was higher in the OPCAB group. Patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (FE 相似文献   

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a small thoracotomy versus off-pump: a case-matched study

Objective: The minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) operation performed via a small thoracotomy has not previously been examined in a direct comparison to sternotomy off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). Methods: We matched, according to age, gender, left ventricular function, and median number of distal anastomoses, 150 patients who underwent MICS CABG via small left thoracotomy, and 150 patients who received sternotomy OPCAB. All operations were performed by the same surgeon. Results: There was no perioperative mortality (0/300). In the MICS CABG group, pump assistance was used in 28/150 (19%) patients, and conversion to sternotomy occurred in 10/150 (6.7%) patients. In the OPCAB group, conversion to on-pump occurred in 3/150 (2.0%) patients. There were four (2.7%) reoperations for bleeding and one (0.7%) for anastomotic revision in each group. The median hospital length of stay was 5 days for MICS CABG (average 5.4), and 6 days for OPCAB (average 7.2) (P = 0.02). New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 35 (23%) MICS CABG patients and in 42 (28%) OPCAB patients (P = 0.3). No wound infection occurred with MICS CABG versus six (4.0%) with OPCAB (P = 0.03). A self-limiting left pleural effusion developed in 22 (15%) MICS CABG patients and in six (4.0%) OPCAB patients (P = 0.002). The median time to return to full physical activity was 12 days in MICS CABG patients versus >5 weeks in OPCAB patients (P < 0.001). Conclusions: MICS CABG is a valuable alternative for patients in need of multivessel CABG. The operation appears at least as safe as OPCAB, and associated with shorter hospital length of stay, less wound infections, and faster postoperative recovery than OPCAB.     

Postoperative hyperthermia following off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE: Hyperthermia is common in the first 24 hours following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). An inflammatory response to CPB is often implicated in the pathophysiology of this fever. Unlike CABG with CPB, the temperature pattern after off-pump CABG (OPCAB), where CPB is avoided, has not yet been described. The purpose of this study was to describe the postoperative temperature pattern following OPCAB and to compare it with that following on-pump cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Consenting patients undergoing CABG or OPCAB procedures. INTERVENTIONS: Observational. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the CABG patients, 89% had temperature elevations above 38 degrees C, versus 44% of the OPCAB patients (P = 0.04). Peak body temperature was higher in the on-pump patients (CABG 38.5 degrees C +/- 0.4 degrees C versus OPCAB 37.9 degrees C +/- 0.5 degrees C; P = 0.002), as was the area under the curve for temperatures greater than 38 degrees C (CABG 1.6 +/- 1.7 degrees C/hr versus OPCAB 0.4 +/- 1.2 degrees C/hr; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump CABG surgery patients experience less hyperthermia compared with on-pump CABG patients. The reasons for a lower incidence and severity of hyperthermia after OPCAB surgery are not known, but may be related to a reduced inflammatory response.     

On- and off-pump coronary surgery and perioperative myocardial infarction: an issue between incomplete and extensive revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: Complete myocardial revascularization is the standard for coronary artery bypass grafting. It has been shown, however, that off-pump coronary bypass surgery (OPCAB) may reduce completeness of revascularization without affecting perioperative myocardial infarction rates. We evaluated the influence of OPCAB on major postoperative events in a large consecutive cohort of patients, with special emphasis on risk factors for perioperative myocardial infarction. METHODS: From 1995 to 2004, 5935 patients underwent isolated coronary bypass surgery; of these, 4623 (77.9%) and 1312 (22.1%) underwent on-pump coronary surgery (CABG) and OPCAB, respectively. Patients undergoing OPCAB were matched to patients undergoing CABG by propensity score; logistic regression analysis models were used to study predictors of perioperative myocardial infarction. RESULTS: In matched pairs, postoperative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and atrial fibrillation were similar between groups, while reoperation for bleeding, time on ventilator and red blood cell use were lower in patients undergoing OPCAB. The number of distal anastomoses was lower in patients undergoing OPCAB (2.2+/-0.80 in OPCAB vs 2.9+/-0.86 in CABG, p<0.001), as well as complete revascularization rates (61.9% in OPCAB vs 90.0% in CABG, p<0.001). Multivariate analyses, performed on preoperative and intraoperative variables, showed that both incomplete revascularization and increasing numbers of distal anastomoses (even when controlling for completeness of revascularization) were significant predictors of perioperative myocardial infarction, while CABG/OPCAB strategy did not influence it. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of surgical technique did not influence the occurrence of major perioperative complications and of myocardial infarction, which is negatively affected by incomplete or too extensive revascularization strategies.     

Multivessel off-pump revascularization in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis: early and midterm outcome analysis

BACKGROUND: The presence of significant left main stenosis (> or =50%) has been considered a relative contraindication to the use of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) stemming from well-documented hemodynamic perturbations during the displacement of the heart. We examined our experience with patients with critical left main stenosis (LMS) to assess the safety and feasibility of OPCAB in this subgroup. METHODS: Our prospectively updated database was queried to identify all patients with severe left main disease who underwent isolated coronary revascularization between January 1, 1999 and May 31, 2002. This query yielded 234 on-pump and 420 off-pump patients with significant LMS whose clinical information was retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The groups were well matched with regard to gender, left ventricular function, surgical priority, and severity of angina. The conventional coronary artery bypass (CABG) group was significantly younger than the OPCAB group and had a higher incidence of a previous myocardial infarction. Patients in the CABG cohort were more likely than OPCAB patients to remain ventilated after 24 hours, require placement of intraoperative or postoperative intraaortic balloon pump, or suffer from postoperative renal failure. There was a decrease in mortality (6.4% vs. 1.9%; p = 0.006) when CPB was eliminated. Intermediate term survival analysis revealed a significant survival benefit in the off-pump group (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel off-pump revascularization in patients with severe left main disease is a safe and effective alternative to conventional bypass grafting and conveys a survival benefit.     

Beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting for acute myocardial infarction

We consider that off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [OPCAB], which results in local myocardial ischemia, is more effective for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than conventional CABG under cardiac arrest with global myocardial ischemia. Twenty-one patients (15 males, 6 females) received OPCAB for AMI, among whom surgery was performed following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) failure in 4 and PCI was performed prior to OPCAB in 2, while PCI was not performed in the remaining 15. Preoperatively, 16 patients had intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP), and 4 had IABP and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS). The mean interval from onset to surgery was 11.7 (range 3 to 40) hours. In 20 cases, a complete revascularization was performed. The mean number of bypasses was 2.3 and OPCAB was carried out in 14 patients. In 2 cases, OPCAB was converted to on-pump beating CABG for complete revascularization. Fourteen patients (67%), each maintained with preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), were discharged with an elective bypass. Four patients died after on-pump beating CABG, in whom EF was lower than 10%. In addition, 3 died of low cardiac output syndrome (LOS) under PCPS and 1 of ventricular fibrillation. Based on our results, we considered that complete revascularization using OPCAB was effective for cases of AMI with PCI difficulty. However, in shock cases requiring PCPS, cardiac function was not improved even after revascularization. Therefore, it is necessary to study new procedures for shock cases during the period from onset to surgery.     

Application of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency surgery.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has become a more applicable procedure, even in patients with multi-vessel disease. However, the role of OPCAB for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring emergency revascularization has not been established yet. We reviewed our results of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with ACS. Seventy-two patients with ACS who underwent emergency CABG were studied. Twenty-five underwent OPCAB and 47 on-pump CABG. OPCAB was mainly indicated for patients who were possibly at risk for cardiopulmonary bypass. When the coronary anatomy was suitable in younger or less risky patients, OPCAB was performed. Patients with multi-vessel disease or with a critical left main trunk lesion were not excluded from OPCAB. The mean number of grafted vessels was 2.6 per patient in the OPCAB group, and 3.8 per patient in the on-pump group (p<0.0001). However, none of the patients in either group required postoperative catheter intervention. Mean operative time was 195 minutes in the OPCAB group and 286 minutes in the on-pump group (p<0.0001). There were three postoperative deaths in the OPCAB group and four in the on-pump group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative cardiogenic shock was the only significant predictor for postoperative death (odds ratio, 7.33). The selection of the on-pump procedure or OPCAB did not correlate with operative death. Thus, we conclude that OPCAB can be performed safely and effectively in selected patients with ACS requiring emergency coronary revascularization.     

Short-term and long-term neurocognitive outcome in on-pump versus off-pump CABG.

OBJECTIVE: Neuropsychological dysfunctions are considered to be important complications of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). We examined the frequency of neuropsychological abnormalities occurring in patients undergoing CABG with (on-pump) and without (off-pump) cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Neuropsychological assessment with seven cognitive tasks was performed one day before, 6-7 days after (n=49) and 6 months after (n=35) surgery. The subgroup undergoing on-pump surgery (n=30 at 7 days and n=22 at 6 months) was demographically comparable to the off-pump subgroup. The on-pump group included more multiple vessel disease. RESULTS: Repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (using surgical group as a between-subjects factor) on the group data revealed no significant differences neither immediately after surgery nor at 6 months after surgery, compared with the preoperative performance. There were no significant differences between the on-pump and off-pump groups in post-operative neuropsychological performance soon after surgery. A significant difference was found between the two groups 6 months after surgery, with more favorable results for the off-pump group. Individual comparisons revealed that 59% of the patients of both groups undergoing CABG showed evidence of cognitive impairment soon after surgery. In 11% of the patients (all on-pump), the cognitive sequelae persisted at follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study showed no short-term difference between the on-pump and off-pump CABG groups. The long-term cognitive outcome revealed more favorable results for the off-pump group. Although a preference to operate multiple vessel disease with classical cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has to be considered, the present study shows evidence for a different pattern of early decline and late recovery of cognitive functions in patients undergoing CABG with and without CPB.