Molecular analysis of Fanconi anemia and mismatch repair genes in patients with colorectal carcinoma

A cohort of 206 consecutively-collected patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) were screened for germline mutations in the principal DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MLH1 and MSH2, and in the Fanconi anemia (FA) genes involved in homologous recombination DNA repair. Mutation analysis was performed by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and automated sequencing. Available paraffin-embedded tumor tissues were evaluated for gene expression by immunohistochemistry. Genes of the FA pathway were found to participate in CRC pathogenesis, being silenced during disease progression and metastasis formation. Conversely, MLH1 and MSH2 genes seem to be inactivated at earlier stages of the disease. Finally, very few (about 5%) cases presented a simultaneous inactivation of the MMR and FA genes. Overall, our findings indicated that: i) mismatch DNA repair remains the main mechanism to be altered at both germline and somatic levels among CRC patients; ii) functional impairments of mismatch DNA repair and FA-related repair may represent two different pathogenetic alterations which are concurring in colorectal cancer progression.     

Isolated loss of PMS2 expression in colorectal cancers: frequency, patient age, and familial aggregation.

PURPOSE: Most colorectal cancers that have high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) show loss of immunohistochemical expression of proteins that participate in the DNA mismatch repair process, most often involving MLH1 and MSH2. Less commonly, a third DNA mismatch repair protein, MSH6, may also be lost as the primary event. Rarely, tumors with MSI-H show normal expression of these three proteins. The genetic deficiency leading to the MSI-H phenotype in such cases is unknown. PMS2 is another member of the DNA mismatch repair complex. Its expression is generally lost in tumors with MLH1 loss of expression. Rarely, there is selective loss of PMS2 expression. We sought to describe the frequency and clinical correlates of selective loss of expression of PMS2 with the MSI-H tumor phenotype. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Two thousand seven hundred nineteen colorectal cancers from both clinic- and research-based ascertainment were studied. Tumor MSI testing and immunohistochemistry for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 were conducted. Medical records were abstracted for age at diagnosis, gender, colorectal cancer site, and family history. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-five of the 2,719 tumors were MSI-H. Of these, 93% showed loss of expression of MLH1, MSH2, and/or MSH6. Thirty-eight showed normal expression for these proteins. PMS2 immunohistochemical staining was successful in 32 of 38 of these tumors. Of the 32, 23 showed selective loss of expression of PMS2. This was associated with young age of diagnosis and right-sided location but not with a striking family history of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 97% of the MSI-H tumors showed loss of expression for one or more of these four mismatch repair proteins. Selective loss of expression of PMS2 was present in 72% of cases in which colorectal cancers had an MSI-H phenotype but no alteration of expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. The underlying mechanism involved cannot be determined from this study but could involve point mutations in other DNA mismatch repair genes with retention of immunohistochemical expression, somatic inactivation of PMS2, or germ line mutation of PMS2.     

DNA methylotype analysis in colorectal cancer

The methylation status of a gene promoter is considered to be an important mechanism for the development of many tumors, including colorectal cancer. Recent studies have shown that specific patterns of DNA methylation across multiple CpG loci in some human tumors are more informative than the detection of one single CpG locus in tumor genomes. In the present study, multiple CpG methylations of three genes (CDKN2A, DPYD and MLH1) were detected in DNA samples from patients with colorectal cancer using Pyrosequencing(R) technology. The bisulfite-converted DNA was amplified with a nested PCR and five or six CpG loci of each gene were assessed to determine DNA methylotype. Our data showed that 10/49 (20.4%), 6/48 (12.5%) and 14/49 (28.6%) of tumors were methylated with a DNA methylation level >0.2 in CDKN2A, DPYD and MLH1, respectively. Our study indicated a similar DNA methylation level across the multiple CpG loci for all three genes in the methylated tumor DNA samples, demonstrating a dichotomous trait in DNA methylation. The tumor DNA samples had unique DNA methylation patterns, which were high-degree and multiple-site methylation, but the normal DNA samples had no or a low-degree and dispersed single-site methylation. In addition, an inverse correlation in those methylated tumors was observed between DNA methylation and RNA expression for MLH1 (RS=-0.62, P=0.003), but not for CDKN2A and DPYD. In conclusion, distinctive DNA methylotypes exist in colorectal cancer and may depict a distinct biology in apparently homogeneous tumors.     

Identification and characterization of a novel MLH1 genomic rearrangement as the cause of HNPCC in a Tunisian family: evidence for a homologous Alu-mediated recombination

High rates of early colorectal cancers are observed in Tunisia suggesting high genetic susceptibility. Nevertheless, up to now no molecular studies have been performed. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is the most frequent cause of inherited colorectal cancer. It is caused by constitutional mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Here, we investigated a Tunisian family highly suspected of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Six patients were diagnosed with a colorectal or an endometrial cancer at an early age, including one young female who developed a colorectal cancer at 22 years and we tested for germline mutations in MMR genes. MMR genes were tested for rearrangements by MLPA (MLH1, MSH2) and the presence of point mutations by sequencing (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6). Moreover, tumors were analyzed for microsatellite instability and expression of MMR proteins, as well as for somatic rearrangements in MLH1 and MSH2 by MLPA. MMR gene analysis by MLPA revealed the presence of a large deletion in MLH1 removing exon 6. Sequence analysis of the breakpoint region showed that this rearrangement resulted from a homologous unequal recombination mediated by a repetitive Alu sequence. Moreover, tumors harbored biallelic deletion of MLH1 exon 6 and loss of heterozygosity at MLH1 intragenic markers, suggesting duplication of the rearranged allele in the tumor. This germline MLH1 rearrangement was associated to a severe phenotype in this family. This is the first report of a molecular analysis in a Tunisian family with HNPCC.     

Co-repression of mismatch repair gene expression by hypoxia in cancer cells: role of the Myc/Max network

The key microenvironmental stress of hypoxia is associated with a diverse spectrum of alterations in both the expression and activation patterns of numerous DNA repair and stress-response factors. We have shown previously that hypoxia causes decreased expression of the mismatch repair gene, MLH1, leading to increased genetic instability in tumor cells, although the mechanism remained to be determined. Here we elucidate a mechanism by which MLH1 and another mismatch repair (MMR) gene, MSH2, are repressed by hypoxia. This repression occurs via a dynamic shift in occupancy from activating c-Myc/Max to repressive Mad1/Max and Mnt/Max complexes at the proximal promoters of both the MLH1 and MSH2 genes. Repression of the MMR genes was also seen in both hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) proficient and deficient cells, and so ruling out an essential role for HIFs in MMR gene expression. These data highlight a novel HIF-independent stress-response pathway induced by hypoxia leading to the coordinated repression of MLH1 and MSH2, key genes in the MMR pathway, and they provide further insight into the possible mechanisms of hypoxia-induced genetic instability and consequent tumor progression in cancer cells.     

Distinction of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and sporadic microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer through quantification of MLH1 methylation by real-time PCR.

PURPOSE: Promoter hypermethylation occurs frequently in tumors and leads to silencing of tumor-relevant genes like tumor suppressor genes. In a subset of sporadic colorectal cancers (CRC), inactivation of the mismatch repair gene MLH1 due to promoter methylation causes high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H). MSI-H is also a hallmark of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) in which mismatch repair inactivation results from germ-line mutations. For differentiation of sporadic and hereditary MSI-H tumor patients, MLH1 promoter methylation analysis is a promising tool but is not yet used in daily diagnostics because only qualitative techniques without standardization are available. The aim of this study is to establish a reliable and quantitative MLH1 methylation analysis technique and to define valid MLH1 methylation cutoff values for HNPCC diagnostics. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We developed a new real-time PCR-based technique to detect and quantify methylation of both proximal and distal hMLH1 promoter regions. We established and validated this technique in a cohort of 108 CRCs [94 MSI-H and 16 microsatellite stable (MSS) cases] comprising a reference (n = 58) and a tester tumor group (n = 50). RESULTS: The reference tumor group contained 28 HNPCC with proven germ-line mutations or positive Amsterdam I criteria (median age, 37 years) and loss of MLH1 expression, 14 sporadic MSI-H CRC tumors with loss of MLH1 expression and BRAF V600E mutation (median age, 80.5 years), and 16 sporadic MSS CRC (median age, 76.5 years). No MLH1 promoter methylation could be found in any MSS tumors. HNPCC patients showed no or low level of MLH1 promoter methylation. A cutoff value of 18% methylation extent could be determined in this study to define MLH1 hypermethylation specific for sporadic MSI-H cases. Methylation could also be verified qualitatively by melting point analysis. BRAF V600E mutations were not detected in any HNPCC patients (n = 22 informative cases). CONCLUSION: According to the present data, quantitative MLH1 methylation analysis in MSI-H CRC is a valuable molecular tool to distinguish between HNPCC and sporadic MSI-H CRC. The detection of a BRAF V600E mutation further supports the exclusion of HNPCC.     

Expression of DNA double-strand break repair proteins ATM and BRCA1 predicts survival in colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The double-strand break (DSB) is the major DNA lesion leading to chromosomal aberrations and faithful repair is crucial for maintaining genomic instability. Very little is known about the expression of DNA DSB repair proteins in colorectal cancer. To address this issue, we examined the expression pattern of DSB repair key proteins ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, Ku70, and Ku80 and their putative role in patients survival in a large series of colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 342 sporadic colorectal cancer were subjected to immunohistochemistry by using specific antibodies for the various proteins investigated. Staining results were compared with clinicopathologic data, patient survival, as well as expression of mismatch repair proteins MLH1 and MSH2. RESULTS: The expression pattern of both ATM and BRCA1 predicted survival in all colorectal cancer patients as well as in the small subgroup of patients that received adjuvant therapy. Low expression of ATM and BRCA1 was associated with loss of MLH1 or MSH2 expression. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show a relationship between the expression of DNA DSB repair proteins ATM and BRCA1 and survival in colorectal cancer patients. Studies in tumors from large randomized trials are now necessary to validate our pilot data and establish the clinical usefulness of the immunohistochemical assay in predicting response to a particular adjuvant therapy regimen. Furthermore, our results indicate a possible link between expression of DNA mismatch repair and DNA DSB repair proteins in sporadic colorectal cancer, which warrants further investigation.     

Altered expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 in predisposition to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: A considerable fraction (30% to 70%) of families with verified or putative hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer fails to show mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Our purpose was to address the genetic etiology of such families. Materials and METHODS: We scrutinized a population-based cohort of 26 families from Finland that had screened mutation-negative by previous techniques. Blood was tested for allelic messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 by single nucleotide primer extension (SNuPE), and tumor tissue for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as well as for microsatellite instability (MSI). Full-length cDNAs of genes implicated by SNuPE or IHC were cloned and sequenced. RESULTS: Unbalanced mRNA expression of MLH1 alleles was evident in two families. An inherited nonsense mutation was subsequently identified in one family, and complete silencing of the mutated allele was identified in the other family. Extinct protein expression by IHC implicated MLH1 in these two and in four other families, MSH2 in four families, and MSH6 in one family. Although no unequivocal genomic mutations were detected in the latter families, haplotype and other findings provided support for heritable defects. With one exception, all tumors with IHC alterations showed MSI, in contrast to the remaining families, which showed neither IHC changes nor MSI. CONCLUSION: Our expression-based strategy stratified the present "mutation-negative" cohort into two discrete categories: families linked to the major MMR genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 (11 [42%] of 26) and those likely to be associated with other, as yet unknown susceptibility genes (15 [58%] of 26).     

Genomic rearrangements in MSH2, MLH1 or MSH6 are rare in HNPCC patients carrying point mutations

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant disease with high penetrance, caused by germline mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and MLH3. Most reported pathogenic mutations are point mutations, comprising single base substitutions, small insertions and deletions. In addition, genomic rearrangements, such as large deletions and duplications not detectable by PCR and Sanger sequencing, have been identified in a significant proportion of HNPCC families, which do not carry a pathogenic MMR gene point mutation. To clarify whether genomic rearrangements in MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6 also occur in patients carrying a point mutation, we subjected normal tissue DNA of 137 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients to multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis. Patients fulfilled the following pre-requisites: all patients met at least one criterion of the Bethesda guidelines and their tumors exhibited high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and/or showed loss of expression of MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6 proteins. PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing of all exons of at least one MMR gene, whose protein expression had been lost in the tumor tissue, identified 52 index patients without a point mutation (Group 1), 71 index patients with a pathogenic point mutation in MLH1 (n=38) or MSH2 (n=22) or MSH6 (n=11) (Group 2) and 14 patients with an unclassified variant in MLH1 (n=9) or MSH2 (n=3) or MSH6 (n=2) (Group 3). In 13 of 52 patients of group 1 deletions of at least one exon were identified. In addition, in group 3 one EX1_15del in MLH1 was found. No genomic rearrangement was identified in group 2 patients. Genomic rearrangements represent a significant proportion of pathogenic mutations of MMR genes in HNPCC patients. However, genomic rearrangements are rare in patients carrying point mutations in MMR genes. These findings suggest the use of genomic rearrangement tests in addition to Sanger sequencing in HNPCC patients.     

DNA repair and cancer in colon and rectum: Novel players in genetic susceptibility

Interindividual differences in DNA repair systems may play a role in modulating the individual risk of developing colorectal cancer. To better ascertain the role of DNA repair gene polymorphisms on colon and rectal cancer risk individually, we evaluated 15,419 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 185 DNA repair genes using GWAS data from the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) and the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO), which included 8,178 colon cancer, 2,936 rectum cancer cases and 14,659 controls. Rs1800734 (in MLH1 gene) was associated with colon cancer risk (p-value = 3.5 × 10⁻⁶) and rs2189517 (in RAD51B) with rectal cancer risk (p-value = 5.7 × 10⁻⁶). The results had statistical significance close to the Bonferroni corrected p-value of 5.8 × 10⁻⁶. Ninety-four SNPs were significantly associated with colorectal cancer risk after Binomial Sequential Goodness of Fit (BSGoF) procedure and confirmed the relevance of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and homologous recombination pathways for colon and rectum cancer, respectively. Defects in MMR genes are known to be crucial for familial form of colorectal cancer but our findings suggest that specific genetic variations in MLH1 are important also in the individual predisposition to sporadic colon cancer. Other SNPs associated with the risk of colon cancer (e.g., rs16906252 in MGMT) were found to affect mRNA expression levels in colon transverse and therefore working as possible cis-eQTL suggesting possible mechanisms of carcinogenesis.     

Mismatch repair polymorphisms and the risk of colorectal cancer

Rare germline variants in mismatch repair genes have been linked to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer; however, it is unknown whether common polymorphisms in these genes alter the risk of colorectal cancer. To examine the association between common variants in mismatch repair genes and colorectal cancer, we conducted a case-cohort study within the CLUE II cohort. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms in 3 mismatch repair genes (MSH3 R940Q, MSH3 T1036A, MSH6 G39E and MLH1 I219V) were genotyped in 237 colorectal cancer cases and a subcohort of 2,189 participants. Incidence rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each polymorphism were estimated. The MSH3 1036A variant was found to be associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (RR=1.28, 95% CI: 0.94-1.74 and RR=1.65, 95% CI: 1.01-2.70 for the AT and TT genotypes, respectively, with p(trend)=0.02), particularly proximal colon cancer. Although the MSH3 940Q variant was only weakly associated with colorectal cancer overall (p(trend)=0.07), it was associated with a significant increased risk of proximal colon cancer (RR=1.69, 95% CI: 1.10-2.61 and RR=2.68, 95% CI: 0.96-7.47 for the RQ and QQ genotypes, respectively with p(trend)=0.005). Processed meat intake appeared to modify the association between the MSH3 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer (p(interaction) < 0.10 for both). No association was observed with the MSH6 and MLH1 polymorphisms overall. This study suggests that common polymorphisms in the mismatch repair gene, MSH3, may increase the risk of colorectal cancer, especially proximal colon cancer.     

Tumors established with cell lines selected for oxaliplatin resistance respond to oxaliplatin if combined with cetuximab.

PURPOSE: To establish whether cetuximab, a chimeric IgG1 antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor, has the potential to restore responsiveness to oxaliplatin in preclinical cancer models, as has been shown with irinotecan in irinotecan refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The effects of cetuximab and oxaliplatin, alone or in combination, were tested in vitro and in vivo using human colorectal cancer cell lines selected for oxaliplatin resistance, as well as parental control cell lines. Evaluations were made of subcutaneous xenograft tumor growth in nu/nu athymic mice, as well as activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2) and AKT, expression of DNA repair genes, density of apurinic/apyrimidinic DNA damage, and accumulation of platinum-DNA adducts in vitro. RESULTS: Oxaliplatin + cetuximab efficacy in murine subcutaneous xenograft models was greater than that of monotherapies and independent of the responsiveness to oxaliplatin monotherapy. In vitro, cetuximab reduced expression of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 and XPF, which are key components of the nucleotide excision repair pathway involved in the excision of platinum-DNA adducts. In addition, cetuximab reduced expression of XRCC1, a component of the base excision repair pathway responsible for the repair of apurinic/apyrimidinic sites. Effects of cetuximab on DNA repair protein levels were downstream to effects on mitogen-activated protein kinase and AKT pathway activation. In line with effects on DNA repair protein expression, cetuximab increased the accumulation of platinum and apurinic/apyrimidinic sites on DNA during oxaliplatin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab has the potential to salvage the benefits of oxaliplatin in oxaliplatin-resistant colorectal cancer patients by reducing DNA repair capacity.     

Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes,recreational physical activity and breast cancer risk

The mechanisms driving the inverse association between recreational physical activity (RPA) and breast cancer risk are complex. While exercise is associated with increased reactive oxygen species production it may also improve damage repair systems, particularly those that operate on single‐strand breaks including base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER) and mismatch repair (MMR). Of these repair pathways, the role of MMR in breast carcinogenesis is least investigated. Polymorphisms in MMR or other DNA repair gene variants may modify the association between RPA and breast cancer incidence. We investigated the individual and joint effects of variants in three MMR pathway genes (MSH3, MLH1 and MSH2) on breast cancer occurrence using resources from the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project. We additionally characterized interactions between RPA and genetic polymorphisms in MMR, BER and NER pathways. We found statistically significant multiplicative interactions (p < 0.05) between MSH2 and MLH1, as well as between postmenopausal RPA and four variants in DNA repair (XPC‐Ala499Val, XPF‐Arg415Gln, XPG‐Asp1104His and MLH1‐lle219Val). Significant risk reductions were observed among highly active women with the common genotype for XPC (OR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36–0.81) and XPF (OR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44–0.87), as well as among active women who carried at least one variant allele in XPG (OR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29–0.77) and MLH1 (OR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30–0.71). Our data show that women with minor alleles in both MSH2 and MLH1 could be at increased breast cancer risk. RPA may be modified by genes in the DNA repair pathway, and merit further investigation.     

Telomere shortening is associated with poor prognosis and telomerase activity correlates with DNA repair impairment in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Telomere function and DNA damage response pathways are frequently inactivated in cancer. Moreover, some telomere-binding proteins have been implicated in DNA repair. The purpose of this work consists of evaluating the prognostic impact of telomere dysfunction and its relationship with DNA repair systems in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed 83 NSCLCs and their corresponding control samples obtained from patients submitted to surgery. Telomere function was evaluated by determining telomerase activity and telomere length. DNA repair expression assays were established by using cDNA arrays containing 96 DNA-repair genes and by Real Time Quantitative PCR. RESULTS: Our data indicated that telomere attrition was significantly associated with poor clinical outcome of patients (P=0.02), being this parameter a significant prognostic factor independent of tumour stage (P=0.012; relative risk=1.887; 95% CI: 1.147-3.102). DNA-repair gene expression studies showed down regulation of DCLRE1C and GTF2H1 and a clear FLJ10858 up regulation in tumour tissues, as compared to controls. In addition, a number of genes related to DNA-repair were significantly down regulated in tumours that reactivated telomerase (DCLRE1C, GTF2H1, PARP-3, MLH1, and TRF2). CONCLUSIONS: Telomere shortening emerged as a poor clinical evolution parameter in NSCLC. Moreover, results from this work suggest a relationship between the loss of several DNA repair genes and telomerase activity, which may be of relevance in the pathogenesis of non-small lung cancer.     

Cyclooxygenase 2 expression in colorectal cancer with DNA mismatch repair deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) overexpression is a frequent but not universal event in colorectal cancer. It has been suggested that COX-2 protein expression is reduced in colorectal cancer with a defective mismatch repair (MMR) system, a phenomenon commonly associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) but also present in up to 15% of sporadic tumors. Aim: To assess COX-2 expression in a large series of fully characterized colorectal cancer patients with respect to the MMR system and to dissect the mechanisms responsible for altered COX-2 expression in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MMR-deficient colorectal cancer were identified in a nationwide, prospective, multicenter study (EPICOLON project). Control MMR-proficient colorectal cancer patients were randomly selected. COX-2 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Personal and familial characteristics, as well as MSH2/MLH1 expression and germ line mutations, were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients, 46 with MMR deficiency and 107 with MMR proficiency, were included in the analysis. Overall, tumor COX-2 overexpression was observed in 107 patients (70%). COX-2 overexpression was observed in 85 patients (79%) with a MMR-proficient system, but only in 22 patients (48%) with a MMR-deficient colorectal cancer (P < 0.001). The lack of COX-2 overexpression was independently associated with a MMR-deficient system (odds ratio, 3.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-8.51; P = 0.001) and a poor degree of differentiation (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.30-11.31; P = 0.015). In the subset of patients with a MMR-deficient colorectal cancer, lack of COX-2 overexpression correlated with a poor degree of differentiation, no fulfillment of Amsterdam II criteria, absence of MSH2/MLH1 germ line mutations, presence of tumor MSH2 expression, and lack of tumor MLH1 expression. CpG island promoter hypermethylation of COX2 was observed in 6 of 18 (33%) tumors lacking COX-2 expression in comparison with 2 of 28 (7%) tumors expressing this protein (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Up to half of MMR-deficient colorectal cancer do not show COX-2 overexpression, a fact observed almost exclusively in patients with sporadic forms. COX2 hypermethylation seems to be responsible for gene silencing in one third of them. These results suggest the potential utility of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in HNPCC chemoprevention and may explain the lack of response of this approach in some sporadic tumors.     

Genetic investigation of DNA-repair pathway genes PMS2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, OGG1 and MTH1 in sporadic colon cancer

Mutations in DNA repair genes have previously been identified as causative factors for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). Recent evidence also supports an association between DNA sequence variation in these genes and sporadic colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Genetic investigation of DNA repair genes PMS2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, OGG1 and MTH1, as possible susceptibility factors for sporadic CRC, was done using both a haplotype tagging and a candidate (i.e. coding) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) approach. Some 1,068 patients with operated CRC (median age at diagnosis: 59 years) were compared to 738 sex-matched control individuals (median age: 67 years). Haplotype tagging SNPs, previously reported risk variants and all known coding SNPs with a minor allele frequency >0.005 were genotyped in PMS2 (N = 10), MLH1 (N = 11), MSH2 (N = 18), MSH6 (N = 15), MUTYH (N = 7), OGG1 (N = 11) and MTH1 (N = 3). No evidence for an association between CRC and any of the 7 genes was detected, neither with the tagging or coding SNPs nor in a sliding window haplotype analysis (all nominal p-values >0.05). The previously reported risk variants D132H in MLH1 and R154H in OGG1 were not even observed in the German population. Genetic CRC risk factors so far identified in DNA repair genes seem to be rare and population-specific. Their association with the disease could not be replicated in German CRC samples. It remains to be elucidated by more systematic, large-scale experiments whether common variants in the same genes, but present across populations, represent risk factors for sporadic CRC.     

Assessing pathogenicity of MLH1 variants by co-expression of human MLH1 and PMS2 genes in yeast

Background  

Loss of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) in humans, mainly due to mutations in the hMLH1 gene, is linked to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Because not all MLH1 alterations result in loss of MMR function, accurate characterization of variants and their classification in terms of their effect on MMR function is essential for reliable genetic testing and effective treatment. To date, in vivo assays for functional characterization of MLH1 mutations performed in various model systems have used episomal expression of the modified MMR genes. We describe here a novel approach to determine accurately the functional significance of hMLH1 mutations in vivo, based on co-expression of human MLH1 and PMS2 in yeast cells.