Tumours with loss of MSH6 expression are MSI-H when screened with a pentaplex of five mononucleotide repeats

Background:

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is commonly screened using a panel of two mononucleotide and three dinucleotide repeats as recommended by a consensus meeting on MSI tumours held at the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD, USA). According to these recommendations, tumours are classified as MSI-H when at least two of the five microsatellite markers show instability, MSI-L when only one marker shows instability and MSS when none of the markers show instability. Almost all MSI-H tumours are characterised by alterations in one of the four major proteins of the mismatch repair (MMR) system (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2) that renders them MMR deficient, whereas MSI-L and MSS tumours are generally MMR proficient. However, tumours from patients with a pathogenic germline mutation in MSH6 can sometimes present an MSI-L phenotype with the NCI panel. The MSH6 protein is not involved in the repair of mismatches of two nucleotides in length and consequently the three dinucleotide repeats of the NCI panel often show stability in MSH6-deficient tumours.

Methods:

A pentaplex panel comprising five mononucleotide repeats has been recommended as an alternative to the NCI panel to determine tumour MSI status. Several studies have confirmed the sensitivity, specificity and ease of use of the pentaplex panel; however, its sensitivity for the detection of MSH6-deficient tumours is so far unknown. Here, we used the pentaplex panel to evaluate MSI status in 29 tumours known to harbour an MSH6 defect.

Results:

MSI-H status was confirmed in 15 out of 15 (100%) cases where matching normal DNA was available and in 28 out of 29 (97%) cases where matching DNA was not available or was not analysed.

Conclusion:

These results show that the pentaplex assay efficiently discriminates the MSI status of tumours with an MSH6 defect.     

Simplified MSI marker panel for diagnosis of colorectal cancer

Background: Colorectal cancers (CRCs) tumors are diagnosed by microsatellite instability (MSI) due to accumulation of insertion/deletion mutations in tandem repeats of short DNA motifs (1–6 bp) called microsatellites. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is not only a hallmark marker for screening of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), but also a prognostic and predictive marker for sporadic colorectal cancer. Our objective was to determine and study of five mononucleotide microsatellite markers status among Iranian patients with HNPCC and sporadic colorectal cancer. Material and Methods: In the current investigation 80 sporadic CRC and 80 HNPCC patients were evaluated for MSI. The pentaplex panel including 5 quasimonomorphic mononucleotide repeats (NR-21, BAT-26, BAT-25, NR-27 and NR-24) was used. Results: Our findings showed that the NR-21 was the most frequent instable marker among the other markers. 53% and 25.6% specimens had instability in sporadic CRC and HNPCC, respectively. Furthermore, the frequencies of instability BAT-25 was determined in 20% sporadic CRC and 23% HNPCC samples. Interestingly our results demonstrated that the frequency of instability NR-24 was similar 20% sporadic CRC and 20.5% HNPCC. Moreover, percentage of NR-27 in HNPCC was 19.2 and 0% in sporadic CRC. Finally, BAT-26 was instable in 21.8% HNPCC patients while we could find 6.6% instability for BAT-26 in sporadic cases. Conclusion: It seems that among 5 mononucleotides markers NR-21 was the most useful marker for diagnosis HNPCC and sporadic cancer. Following NR-21, BAT-25 and NR-24 are the most reliable markers. Therefore using a triplex panel including 3 aforementioned MSI markers should be more promising markers for identifying MSI status in both patients with HNPCC and/or sporadic colorectal cancer.     

Microsatellite instability testing in colorectal carcinoma: choice of markers affects sensitivity of detection of mismatch repair-deficient tumors.

PURPOSE: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is found in 10% to 15% of sporadic colorectal tumors and is usually caused by defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR). In 1997, a panel of microsatellite markers including mononucleotide and dinucleotide repeats was recommended by a National Cancer Institute workshop on MSI. We investigated the relationship between instability of these markers and MMR protein expression in a cohort of sporadic colorectal cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Paraffin sections of normal and tumor tissue from 262 colorectal cancer patients were examined for MSI status by PCR amplification and for MMR protein expression using antibodies against hMLH1, hPMS2, hMSH2, and hMSH6. RESULTS: Twenty-six (10%) of the patients studied had tumors with a high level of MSI (MSI-H). The frequencies of MSI were the same in African-American and Caucasian patients. Each of the MSI-H tumors had mutations in both mononucleotide and dinucleotide repeats and had loss of MMR protein expression, as did two tumors that had low levels of MSI (MSI-L). These two MSI-L tumors exhibited mutations in mononucleotide repeats only, whereas eight of the other nine MSI-L tumors had mutations in just a single dinucleotide repeat. There was not a statistically significant difference in outcomes between patients whose tumors were MMR-positive or MMR-negative, although there was a slight trend toward improved survival among those with MMR-deficient tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of microsatellite markers is important for MSI testing. Examination of mononucleotide repeats is sufficient for detection of tumors with MMR defects, whereas instability only in dinucleotides is characteristic of MSI-L/MMR-positive tumors.     

A panel of repeat markers for detection of microsatellite instability in murine tumors

A substantial fraction of human malignancies lack functional DNA mismatch repair (MMR), accumulate mutations at high frequency, and exhibit microsatellite instability (MSI). In order to distinguish between MMR-competent and MMR-deficient malignancies, a consensus panel of microsatellite repeats has been adopted for MSI analysis of human tumors. There is no reference panel of repeats for MSI typing of murine malignancies. In this study, we present six new microsatellite repeat markers for MSI typing of mouse tumors. Analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified tumor DNA from MMR-deficient and -proficient mice on denaturing polyacrylamide gels revealed that the new panel of microsatellites was more sensitive in detecting MSI than six commonly used CA(n) repeats. Using the new set of microsatellite markers, we demonstrated the presence of MSI in endometrial carcinoma and cancer precursors from diethylstilbestrol (DES)-treated mice, pointing to a possible role for loss of MMR in hormonally promoted endometrial tumorigenesis.     

Application of the National Cancer Institute international criteria for determination of microsatellite instability in ovarian cancer

Recently, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) established criteria for determination of microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal tumors. Although the best panel of markers for ovarian tumors is not known, we evaluated epithelial ovarian cancers for MSI based on the NCI recommendations. One hundred and nine ovarian tumors were analyzed for MSI by gel analysis of paired germ-line and tumor DNA. PCR amplification was performed using the panel of five microsatellite markers recommended by the NCI (BAT25, BAT26, D5S346, D2S123, and D17S250) and nine additional markers picked based on their genomic location (NME1, D10S197, D11S904, D13S175, DXS981, DXS6800, DXS6807, AR, and D3S1611). Tumors were characterized on the basis of: high-frequency MSI (MSI-H) if two or more of the five NCI markers showed instability or there was instability at 30% or more of all markers tested; or low-frequency MSI (MSI-L) if only one of the five NCI markers showed instability or <30% of all of the markers. All of the other tumors were considered microsatellite stable. On the basis of the NCI markers, 12 (11%) tumors demonstrated MSI-H, and 8 (7%) additional tumors had MSI-L. When all of the 14 markers were considered together, 13 (12%) tumors demonstrated MSI-H (based on 30% or more unstable loci), and 26 (24%) tumors had MSI-L. A single tumor identified to have MSI-H based upon all of the markers tested would have been classified as MSI-L based upon the NCI markers alone. Inclusion of an additional dinucleotide marker (NME1) to the NCI panel allowed detection of all of the tumors with MSI-H using only six markers. MSI-H occurs in approximately 12% of invasive ovarian tumors. For optimal detection of microsatellite instability in ovarian cancer, an additional marker (NME1) may be required, along with the five recommended by the NCI.     

Use of mononucleotide repeat markers for detection of microsatellite instability in mouse tumors

Tumors lacking DNA mismatch repair activity (MMR) from patients with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) or those with sporadic colorectal cancer can be identified by the presence of high levels of instability in repetitive sequences known as microsatellites (MSI). The assessment of MSI phenotype in human tumors helps to establish a clinical diagnosis and is accomplished with a reference panel of five mononucleotide repeats. By contrast, detection of MSI in mouse tumors has proven to be problematic and lack of a uniform set of markers for classification of MSI has impeded comparison of results between studies. We tested for MSI in intestinal tumors from MMR-deficient mice with four mononucleotide repeats with polyA(24-37) tracts and three new markers with extended polyA(59-67) tracts. All seven markers were sensitive to MSI in MMR-deficient tumors, but those with extended mononucleotide tracts displayed larger deletions, which were easily distinguishable from the germline alleles. With a panel of the five most sensitive and specific mononucleotide repeats, a high level of MSI was detected in 100% of MMR-deficient tumors, but not in tumors with MMR activity. This novel panel is an improvement over existing combinations of mono- and dinucleotide repeat markers and should facilitate MSI screening and standardize results from different studies.     

Microsatellite instability testing in Korean patients with colorectal cancer

Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing is useful for identifying patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and detecting sporadic colorectal cancer that develops through replication error pathways. A pentaplex panel is recommended by the National Cancer Institute for MSI testing, but simplified mononucleotide panels and immunohistochemistry of mismatch repair proteins are widely employed for convenience. This study was to evaluate the MSI status of colorectal cancer in Korean patients. This study included 1,435 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma subjected to surgical resection. The pentaplex Bethesda panel was used for MSI testing. Seventy nine (5.5?%) carcinomas were classified as MSI-high (MSI-H) and 95 (6.6?%) as MSI-low (MSI-L). BAT-26 and BAT-25 were unstable in 73 and 75 of 79 MSI-H carcinomas, respectively. With the panel comprising these 2 mononucleotide markers, 72 carcinomas were diagnosed as MSI-H, compared to the Bethesda panel data (72/79, 91.1?%). In contrast, BAT-26 or BAT-25 were unstable in only 7 (7.4?%) of the 95 MSI-L tumors. In the panel with 2 dinucleotide markers, D17250 linked to p53 and D2S123 to hMSH2, detection rates were 89.9?% (71/79) for MSI-H and 80.0?% (76/95) for MSI-L carcinomas, compared to the Bethesda panel. Moreover, we compared the frequency of MSI tumor in our patients with those reported previously from Western countries. In conclusion, the frequency of MSI-H appears lower in colorectal cancer patients in Korea. A simplified panel for MSI testing with BAT-26 and BAT-25 seems not effective for the accurate evaluation of MSI status, particularly in MSI-L colorectal carcinomas, in our patients.     

Incidence and detection of high microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer in a Chinese population: a meta-analysis

BackgroundThe 4 most common types of DNA mutations in tumors are single-nucleotide variations, insertion-deletion, fusion, and copy number variations. This is followed by microsatellite instability (MSI), which is known to trigger the development of MSI-high (MSI-H) cancer and is responsible for 300,000 new cases of cancer per year in China. We aim to conduct a meta-analysis based on a comparison between the positive rates of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) panel (also known as 2B3D NCI panel) and mononucleotide panels for the diagnosis of MSI in the Chinese population.MethodsIn the present meta-analysis, we searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, CQVIP, and CBM databases. MSI diagnosis studies by PCR and capillary electrophoresis were included to compare the incidence of MSI-H in colorectal cancer obtained from panels with different microsatellite markers. Egger’s bias test was used to assess risk of bias.ResultsSeventeen articles were included, which used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) scale for quality evaluation. The NOS scores of the included documents were ≥7 points, and the quality of the documents met the requirements. The incidence of MSI-H detected by the 2B3D NCI panel was 13.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.8–16.4, I²=52.321%, P=0.026, n=10 studies including 2,681 participants], the incidence of MSI-H detected by the mononucleotide panels was 10.6% (95% CI: 7.1–14.7, I²=81.147%, P=0.000, n=7 studies including 3,249 participants). This indicates that, in the Chinese population, the 2B3D NCI panel can detect 27.4% more MSI-H cancers than the mononucleotide panels, 54.7% more MSI-H cancers than the panel of 6 mononucleotides, and its sensitivity is comparable to that of Promega.ConclusionsThe findings of the meta-analysis demonstrated that, using the 2B3D NCI panel for MSI detection can avoid the underestimation of the incidence MSI-H in colorectal cancer and can be considered the most suitable panel for MSI detection in the Chinese population. The inclusion of only published data might be a potential source of publication bias.     

Frequent MSI Mononucleotide Markers for Diagnosis of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer

Background: Failure in the DNA mismatch repair system is commonly accompanied by microsatellite instability and leads to colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to find the most frequent of five mononucleotide markers in order to devise the simplest diagnostic strategy for identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) who were defined by defects in mismatch repair system. Materials and Methods: 78 patients with colorectal cancer were recruited for this investigation. Five mononucleotide markers, NR-27, NR-21, NR-24, BAT-25 and BAT-26, were used as a pentaplex panel to determine MSI status. Results: Two out of five mononucleotide markers, NR-21 (25.6%) and BAT-25 (23.1%) showed more instability than the others. Conclusion: In defining individuals with colorectal cancer, BAT25 and NR-21 may provide diagnostic assistance.     

Microsatellite instability markers for identifying early-onset colorectal cancers caused by germ-line mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes.

PURPOSE: Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing of colorectal cancer tumors is used as a screening tool to identify patients most likely to be mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation carriers. We wanted to examine which microsatellite markers currently used to detect MSI best predict early-onset colorectal cancer caused by germ-line mutations in MMR genes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Invasive primary tumors from a population-based sample of 107 cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed before age 45 years and tested for germ-line mutations in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 and MMR protein expression were screened for MSI using the National Cancer Institute panel and an expanded 10-microsatellite marker panel. RESULTS: The National Cancer Institute five-marker panel system scored 31 (29%) as (NCI)MSI-High, 13 (12%) as (NCI)MSI-Low, and 63 (59%) as (NCI)MS-Stable. The 10-marker panel classified 18 (17%) as (10)MSI-High, 17 (16%) as (10)MSI-Low, and 72 (67%) as (10)MS-Stable. Of the 26 cancers that lacked the expression of at least one MMR gene, 24 (92%) were positive for some level of MSI (using either microsatellite panel). The mononucleotide repeats Bat26, Bat40, and Myb were unstable in all (10)MSI-High cancers and all MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers (100% sensitive). Bat40 and Bat25 were unstable in all tumors of MSH6 mutation carriers (100% sensitive). Bat40 was unstable in all MMR gene mutation carriers (100% sensitive). By incorporating seven mononucleotide repeats markers into the 10-marker panel, we were able to distinguish the carriers of MSH6 mutations (all scored (10)MSI-Low) from the MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers (all scored (10)MSI-High). CONCLUSIONS: In early-onset colorectal cancer, a microsatellite panel containing a high proportion of mononuclear repeats can distinguish between tumors caused by MLH1 and MSH2 mutations from those caused by MSH6 mutations.     

Assessment of markers for the identification of microsatellite instability phenotype in gastric neoplasms

We tested three mononucleotide, 45 dinucleotide, and five tetranucleotide repeats in 30 gastric adenomas and 30 gastric carcinomas for microsatellite instability (MSI) in order to evaluate which microsatellites might indicate the MSI status in gastric neoplasms. Along with the increase in tested markers, the proportion of low-frequency MSI (MSI-L) tumors increased. On immunohistochemistry, MSI-L gastric neoplasms did not show any alteration in hMLH1 or hMSH2 protein expression, while most of the high-frequency MSI (MSI-H) tumors did show alterations in the above mismatch repair proteins. The above findings suggested that MSI-L tumors cannot be distinguished from microsatellite stable tumors. Two mononucleotides, BAT25 and BAT26, were sufficient for the screening of MSI. An additional three dinucleotides, D17S786, D6S105 and D19S188, were also highly sensitive and specific in identifying MSI phenotype tumors.     

Loci for efficient detection of microsatellite instability in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

Most hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is due to germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. Tumors arising as a result of these mutations display instability in microsatellites, which are short tandem repeats of DNA that are distributed throughout the genome. Although a subset of sporadic colorectal carcinomas also have microsatellite instability (MSI), the phenotype is a useful screening test in identifying patients with HNPCC caused by mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Studies have shown that some microsatellite markers are more efficient than others in identifying tumors with MSI. Furthermore, the frequency of instability can be assessed by categorizing patients into high (MSI-H, >/= 30-40% positive markers), low (MSI-L), and microsatellite stable (MSS) groups. Using a panel of 28 microsatellite markers, tumor and normal DNA from 10 HNPCC patients was used to identify the five most efficient markers for detecting MSI (BAT26, D2S123, FGA, D18S35, and TP53-DI). Each of the five markers detected MSI in 80-100% of the cases examined. We then expanded the sample size to 17 tumors from HNPCC patients. Each case had evidence for a mutation in either hMSH2 or hMLH1. We compared the efficiency of our panel of five best markers with another panel of five markers (BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D17S250, and D5S346) identified as being efficient markers for detection of MSI at a recent NCI workshop. Our five selected markers were more efficient (85% vs. 79%) in detecting MSI. However, using either panel, 100% of the cases fell into the MSI-H category and the probability of misclassifying an MSI-H case as MSI-L is very low (0.002-0.008). We also examined four cases meeting the Amsterdam criteria for HNPCC, but with no evidence for mutation in either the hMSH2 or hMLH1 gene. With our panel, three were classified as MSI-H, while only two were classified as such with the NCI reference panel. The probability of misclassifying an MSI-L case as an MSI-H, using a panel of five markers is high (0.263).     

Evaluation of a new panel of six mononucleotide repeat markers for the detection of DNA mismatch repair-deficient tumours

Background:

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a molecular phenotype due to defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system. It is used to predict outcome of colorectal tumours and to screen tumours for Lynch syndrome (LS). A pentaplex panel composed of five mononucleotide markers has been largely recommended for determination of the MSI status. However, its sensitivity may be taken in default in occasional situations. The aim of the study was to optimise this panel for the detection of MSI.

Methods:

We developed an assay allowing co-amplification of six mononucleotide repeat markers (BAT25, BAT26, BAT40, NR21, NR22, NR27) and one polymorphic dinucleotide marker (D3S1260) in a single reaction. Performances of the new panel were evaluated on a cohort of patients suspected of LS.

Results:

We demonstrate that our assay is technically as easy to use as the pentaplex assay. The hexaplex panel shows similar performances for the identification of colorectal and non-MSH6-deficient tumours. On the other hand, the hexaplex panel has higher sensitivity for the identification of MSH6-deficient tumours (94.7% vs 84.2%) and MMR-deficient tumours other than colorectal cancer (92.9% vs 85.7%).

Conclusion:

The hexaplex panel could thus be an attractive alternative to the pentaplex panel for the identification of patients with LS.     

Molecular Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Microsatellite Instability

Objective: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for more than 80% of primary liver cancers. Moreover, in the next 10 years, more than one million patients are expected to die from liver cancer as estimated by the World Health Organization. The aim of the present study is to define the microsatellite phenotype in the blood, tumor and nontumor tissue samples from hepatocellular carcinoma cases to develop a simple non-invasive method for diagnosis and detection of the disease. Methods: A total of 100 patients with histologically-proven HCC were enrolled in this study, blood samples and tissue specimens from tumor and nontumor tissue were obtained from each patient. DNA was extracted and microsatellite instability MSI status was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using 5 mononucleotide and 5 dinucleotide repeats. Results: Among the 100 HCC tumors analyzed, (8%) considered as displaying a typical MSI-H phenotype as defined by instability in at least 3 of the 10 repeats analyzed, (61%) tumors displayed MSI-L and (31%) displayed MSS while in plasma the instability was (40%) for MSI-H, (44%) for MSI-L and (16%) for MSS. Conclusion: our findings could point to the achievement that HCC patients could be diagnosed by MSI analysis using blood sample as non-invasive way and this conclusion achieved our aim as the study shows impressive and promising results.     

Microsatellite instability occurs in distinct subtypes of pediatric but not adult central nervous system tumors

Length alterations in microsatellite repeats, termed microsatellite instability (MSI), are found in 10-15% of sporadic colon, endometrial, and gastric cancers harboring defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes We used the microsatellite markers Big Adenine Tract (BAT) 26 and BAT-25 from the reference panel of five markers recommended by the National Cancer Institute to evaluate the incidence of MSI in 206 central nervous system tumors. We screened 102 pediatric and 104 adult cases representing 165 astrocytic and 41 nonastrocytic tumors. The overall incidence of MSI was 8% (16 of 206). All 16 tumors with MSI were found in pediatric rather than adult patients. MSI was associated with two distinct subtypes of pediatric tumors occurring in 27% (12 of 45) of WHO grade III and grade IV astrocytomas and 24% (4 of 17) of gangliogliomas We evaluated the difference in clinicopathological and genetic features among 45 high-grade pediatric astrocytomas by MSI status. The median survival for pediatric patients with MSI (n = 12) was 8 months compared with 15 months for those patients without MSI (n = 33; P = 0.18). The frequency of p53 gene mutations was 13% for pediatric patients with MSI (n = 8) compared with 47% for those patients without MSI (n = 19; P = 0.19). These results revealed a trend between MSI status and prog nosis and MSI status and frequency of p53 gene mutations. Our data suggest that pediatric high-grade astrocytomas can be attributed to two different genetic pathways: a MMR-deficient pathway and a MMR proficient pathway.     

Frequent Bax frameshift mutations in gastric cancer with high but not low microsatellite instability

Widespread microsatellite instability (MSI) due to the defective DNA mismatch repair underlies the pathogenesis of the majority of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and a subset of various sporadic malignant tumors. Using 5 microsatellite markers and the criteria of MSI proposed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) workshop, we analyzed 205 gastric adenocarcinomas for MSI. Based on the number of markers showing instability per tumor, the tumors were divided into three groups; those with two or more of the five markers displaying instability (high MSI, MSI-H), those with one of five markers displaying instability (low MSI, MSI-L), and those with no instability (microsatellite stable, MSS). Among 205 tumors, 30 (15%) were MSI-H, 15 (7%) were MSI-L, and 160 (78%) were MSS. All of the 30 MSI-H tumors demonstrated instability at BAT26, a sensitive marker for the widespread MSI, while none of the 15 MSI-L tumors did. MSI-H tumors were significantly associated with distal location and well or moderate differentiation, but MSI-L tumors were indistinguishable from MSS tumors. Bax frameshift mutations were detected in 60% of the 30 MSI-H tumors, while not in any of the 15 MSI-L tumors. These results suggest that microsatellite analysis using the criteria proposed by the NCI workshop may be appropriate for gastric cancers because it unveils real differences in genotype and phenotype.     

Low frequency of microsatellite instability in sporadic breast cancer

In some tumors, defects in mismatch repair enzymes lead to errors in the replication of simple nucleotide repeat segments. This condition is commonly known as microsatellite instability (MSI) because of the frequent mutations of microsatellite sequences. Although the MSI phenotype is well recognized in some colon, gastric, pancreatic, and endometrial cancers, reports of MSI in breast cancer are inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of MSI in breast cancer and to correlate its occurrence with clinicopathological parameters, including expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors. We have analyzed the status of 10 different microsatellite loci (mono and dinucleotide repeats). Mmicrosatellite size patterns and LOH were compared in 88 paired breast-cancer/peripheral-blood DNA samples. Fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for typing microsatellites coupled with DNA fragment analysis in an automated DNA sequencer was applied. Microsatellite instability in at least two microsatellite markers was observed in 6 out of 88 (7%) of the cases, all beloging to stage II or III. LOH was found in 48/88 (55%) of the cases. Five of the six cases with MSI also had LOH in other markers different from those of MSI. These MI and LOH data were analysed using a range of clinicopathological parameters, no correlation between MSI and histopathological characteristics were found. A significant correlation was observed between MSI and negative expression of both estrogen and progesterone receptors (p<0.02), indicating a possible relatioship between specific genetic changes at these microsatellite regions and hormonal deregulation in the progresion of breast cancer.     

Instability at sequence repeats in melanocytic tumours

To obtain information on the prevalence of microsatellite mutations in melanomas, we analysed the status of 14 repetitive loci characterized by structurally different non-coding and coding sequence repeats in a panel of 34 primary melanocytic tumours and in lymph node metastases matched to 13 cases. Instability at one or more of the non-coding dinucleotide repeats D2S123, D3S1611, D5S107 and D18S34 was detected in ten out of the 34 primary tumours (29%) and in ten of the 13 metastases (77%). There was no instability at the non-coding mononucleotide repeats BAT25, BAT26 and APDelta3 or at the coding mononucleotide runs within the TGFbetaRII, IGFIIR, BAX, hMSH3 and hMSH6 genes. A five-repeats expansion of the coding E2F4(CAG)n run was found in the only malignant melanoma of soft parts examined, which also showed instability at two dinucleotide loci, and in a superficial spreading melanoma, which was stable at the mononucleotide and dinucleotide repeats but was the only tumour that manifested instability at the SCA1(CAG)n repeat. The absence of mutations at mononucleotide tracts indicates that, in the malignant melanomas tested, microsatellite instability was not associated with the microsatellite mutator phenotype characteristic of mismatch repair-deficient tumours. On the other hand, our results confirm that microsatellite instability at dinucleotide repeats increases with melanoma progression, and indicate that expansions of triplet repeats may occur in melanocytic tumours.     

Different types of microsatellite instability in ovarian carcinoma

Microsatellite instability at mono- and dinucleotide repeats is the hallmark of the hereditary non-polyposis cancer syndrome (HNPCC) and is related to deficient DNA mismatch repair. In contrast, a distinct form of microsatellite instability at selective tetranucleotide repeats (EMAST or elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotides) was described in several non-HNPCC cancer types. EMAST is probably unrelated to mismatch repair defects. We investigated the frequency of microsatellite instability at mononucleotide, dinucleotide and tetranucleotide repeats in a series of 75 ovarian carcinomas (53 serous and 22 non-serous). Microsatellite analysis was carried out using 5 mono- and dinucleotide markers from the National Cancer Institute Consensus Panel and 6 tetranucleotide markers, which have been reported as frequently unstable in the literature. High frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) at mono- and dinucleotide repeats was observed in 9% and a low frequency (MSI-L) in 21% of serous carcinomas. MSI-H was detected in 4% and MSI-L in 18% of non-serous carcinomas. Nine percent of serous carcinomas showed instability at multiple and 9% at single tetranucleotide loci. All non-serous carcinomas were stable at tetranucleotide loci. In summary, EMAST (e.g., tumors with tetranucleotide instability without concomitant MSI-H) was observed in 13% of ovarian serous carcinomas. All EMAST positive tumors were of advanced stage. We conclude that EMAST occurs as a distinct form of microsatellite instability in ovarian cancer. EMAST seems to be particularly frequent in advanced serous carcinomas. Its clinical significance needs to be investigated.     

Microsatellite instability is an independent indicator of recurrence in sporadic stage I-II endometrial adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define the prognostic role of microsatellite status in 65 stage I-II primary sporadic endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (EEA) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Familiarity for neoplasia was ascertained in all patients on the basis of a questionnaire. Microsatellite status was assessed by matching normal and tumoral DNA probed for five dinucleotide repeats and one mononucleotide repeat marker. Microsatellite status was analyzed in relation to clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients and length of disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Eleven tumors (17%) of 65 had instability at two or more loci and were considered as unstable or microsatellite instability (MI). Tumors with no instability or instability at one locus were classified as microsatellite stable (MS). The percentage of MI was significantly higher in poorly than in well to moderately differentiated tumors (50% v 9%; P =.003). The 5-year DFS rate of MI patients was 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35% to 91%) versus 96% (95% CI, 91% to 101%) of MS patients (P =.0004). In multivariate analysis, only the presence of MI, stage II of disease, and depth of myometrial invasion greater than 50% retained independent prognostic roles. CONCLUSION: The assessment of microsatellite status may provide useful information for preoperative prognostic characterization of stage I-II primary sporadic EEA patients in which more individualized treatment options can be attempted.