Phase I study to evaluate multiple regimens of intravenous 5-fluorouracil administered in combination with weekly gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors: a potential broadly active regimen for advanced solid tumor malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity profile of gemcitabine given on a weekly schedule with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of gemcitabine 200 and 300 mg/m(2) weekly as a 30-minute infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (schedule 1) or 450, 600, 800, 1000, 1250, 1500, 1800, and 2200 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 (schedule 2) every 3 weeks, respectively. At the completion of gemcitabine infusion (Day 1), patients received fixed dose continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil at either 300 mg/m(2) (Days 1-21) or 200 mg/m(2) (Days 1-21; schedule 1) every 4 weeks or 200 mg/m(2) (Days 1-14; schedule 2] every 3 weeks, respectively. Toxicity assessments were performed weekly on study, and efficacy measurements were performed every 6-8 weeks. RESULTS: Seventy patients with advanced solid malignancies received a total of 220 cycles of combination chemotherapy. Eleven (14.3%) patients received no more than 1 treatment cycle of combination therapy. Schedule 1 maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 600 mg/m(2)/week when combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at 200 mg/m(2)/day (Days 1-21) repeated every 4 weeks. The schedule 2 maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 2200 mg/m(2)/week when combined with 5-FU dosed at 200 mg/m(2)/day (Days 1-14) repeated every 3 weeks. In schedule 1, the limiting factor for gemcitabine delivery was the Day 15 dose that often was omitted because of myelosuppression and/or mucositis. In schedule 1 cycle 1, nonhematologic toxicity was common and included Grade 3-4 toxicities: mucositis (8 patients), fatigue (2 patients), and anorexia (1 patient). One patient had Grade 3-4 neutropenia at dose level 5 (maximum tolerated dose). In schedule 2 cycle 1, hematologic toxicities were more common than nonhematologic toxicity and included Grade 3 anemia (3 patients), Grade 3 neutropenia (4 patients), and Grade 3 thrombocytopenia (2 patients). The nonhematologic toxicities included Grade 3 mucositis (3 patients), Grade 3 fatigue (2 patients), and Grade 3 dehydration (1 patient). Overall, antitumor activity was observed in seven patients. Three of 30 patients with cytokine refractory renal cell carcinoma (RCC; relative risk [RR] 10 %; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-22%) had a partial response. Of the remaining 27 patients with RCC, 4 patients had a minor response, and 10 patients had stable disease lasting a median of 6.4 (range, 4-12) months. The remaining 5 responses occurred in 40 patients (RR, 12.5%; 95% CI, 4.2-26.8%): 2 patients with 5-FU refractory colon carcinoma, 1 patient with hepatoma, 1 patient with paclitaxel-cisplatin-resistant ovarian carcinoma, and 1 patient with cisplatin-resistant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma had a partial response. CONCLUSIONS: For Phase II development, gemcitabine 450-600 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 can be safely combined with 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) given as a continuous infusion (Days 1-21) of a 28-day cycle or gemcitabine 1800 mg/m(2) Days 1 and 8 given with 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) as a continuous infusion (Days 1-14) of a 21-day cycle. The observed antitumor activity in several solid tumors, especially in renal cell carcinoma, warrants broad Phase II evaluation.     

Long term follow-up of women treated with 16-week, dose-intensive adjuvant chemotherapy for high risk breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: A Phase II study was performed evaluating the disease free and overall survival rates associated with a dose-intensive, 16-week, doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in women with breast carcinoma and > or = 10 involved axillary lymph nodes. METHODS: Eligible patients underwent staging with computed tomography and bone scanning and were treated with a 16-week, dose-intensive chemotherapy regimen, comprised of 8 2-week courses of cyclophosphamide, 100 mg/m2 orally, on Days 1-7; doxorubicin, 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.), on Day 1; methotrexate, 100 mg/m2 i.v., on Day 1 with leucovorin rescue, 10 mg/m2, every 6 hours for 6 doses orally on Day 2; vincristine, 1 mg i.v. on Day 1; 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 600 mg/m2 i.v., on Day 2 over 2 hours; and 5-FU, 300 mg/m2/day continuous i.v. on Days 8 and 9. Tamoxifen, 20 mg daily, was administered to patients with estrogen receptor positive tumors treated after October 1988. All patients were offered locoregional radiation therapy. RESULTS: Sixty-four women were treated on protocol. The median follow-up of 27 surviving patients was > 8 years at last follow-up. Three patients were lost to follow-up. The median time to progression was 54 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of event free survival at 5 years was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-56%), and the Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival at 5 years was 57% (95% CI, 44-69%). At 98 months the Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from recurrence was 31% (95% CI, 19-43%) and the Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival at 111 months was 36% (95% CI, 23-49%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of dose-intensive, doxorubicin-based, adjuvant chemotherapy, and intensive staging prior to study entry, the results of the current study are similar to those of previous reports for standard dose chemotherapy and appear inferior to those reported for high dose therapy.     

Irinotecan plus cisplatin has substantial antitumor effect as salvage chemotherapy against germ cell tumors

BACKGROUND: Only 20-30% of patients with refractory or recurrent germ cell tumors (GCT) are cured by salvage chemotherapy. Irinotecan, a new derivative of camptothecin, is a potent anticancer agent against a variety of solid cancers. The current pilot study investigated the efficacy of salvage chemotherapy with irinotecan in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) or nedaplatin (NDP), a derivative of cisplatin, for GCT. METHODS: The combination chemotherapy consisted of 100-150 mg/m(2) irinotecan on Days 1 and 15 or 200-300 mg/m(2) on Day 1 in combination with 20 mg/m(2) CDDP on Days 1-5 or 100 mg/m(2) NDP on Day 1 every 4 weeks. Patients with refractory GCT, ranging in age from 17 to 43 years, received 2-11 cycles of the combination chemotherapy. The median duration of follow-up is 28 months (8-140 months). RESULTS: Twenty patients entered this study, 18 of whom were assessed for response and toxicity. The response rate was 50 % (two complete responses and seven partial responses). Nine patients remain alive without disease. However, six patients died of the disease and one patient died of a brain glioma. The 5-year survival rate was approximately 53%. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, but was manageable. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates that the chemotherapy with irinotecan in combination with CDDP or NDP showed significant anticancer activity for patients with refractory GCT, without serious side effects. Although this study comprised only a few patients, these findings suggest that the combination chemotherapy may be one of the options of salvage chemotherapy for patients with refractory GCT.     

Randomised study of tegafur and oral leucovorin versus intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

This randomised, open-label trial compared oral tegafur (FT)/leucovorin (LV) with the intravenous bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/LV as first-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients were randomised to receive oral FT 750 mg/m2/day for 21 days and LV 15 mg/m2 every 8 h in cycles repeated every 28 days (n=114), or intravenous LV 20 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU 425 mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 4 weeks for 2 cycles, and later every 5 weeks (n=123). Response rate was significantly higher in the FT/LV arm (27%, 95% CI 19-35) than in the 5-FU/LV arm (13%, 95% CI 7-19) (p<0.004). The median time to progression was 5.9 months (95% CI, 5.3-6.5; FT/LV arm) and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.4-6.9; 5-FU/LV arm). Median overall survival was 12.4 months (95% CI, 10.3-14.5 months; FT/LV arm) and 12.2 months (95% CI, 8.9-15.7 months; 5-FU/LV arm) (p=n.s.; hazard ratio FT/LV:5-FU/LV=1.02). 5-FU/LV showed a higher incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.1 vs. 0%). Non-hematological toxicities showed similar incidences in the two treatment arms. Oral FT/LV was more active than IV 5-FU/LV in terms of objective response rate with similar overall survival, and with a favorable toxicity profile. This makes FT/LV a valid alternative to the IV 5-FU schedule in CRC patients.     

Preoperative chemoradiation in fixed distal rectal cancer: dose time factors for pathological complete response

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemoradiation is being utilized extensively in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, a variety of dose time factors in both delivery of chemotherapy and irradiation remain to be established. This study was undertaken to examine the impact of dose time factors on pathological complete response (pCR) rates following preoperative chemoradiation for fixed rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-three patients with fixed rectal cancers were treated with combined 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy and pelvic radiation. Twenty-one patients received bolus 5-FU during the first 3-5 days of radiation and repeated on days 28-33 of their radiation treatment. Twelve patients were treated with continuous infusion (CI) 5-FU, 225 mg/m(2) for the duration of the pelvic radiation. Fifteen patients received a planned total radiation dose of 45 to 50 Gy and 18 patients received a dose of 55 to 60 Gy. Surgical resection was then carried out 6-8 weeks after completion of treatment. RESULTS: Diarrhea was the most frequent acute toxicity. Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 6 patients requiring treatment interruption and was not related to the chemotherapy regimen. There was no Grade 4 or 5 toxicity. pCR was observed in 2 of 21 (10%) patients treated with bolus 5-FU as compared to 8 of 12 (67%) for patients treated with CI (p = 0.002). pCR were observed in 8 of 18 (44%) patients receiving radiation dose > or = 5500 cGy as compared to 2 of 15 (13%) patients treated to a dose < or = 5000 cGy (p = 0.05). In the high-dose radiation (> or = 5500 cGy) group, a significant difference in pCR rate was observed in patients treated with CI, 8 of 12 (67%) (p = 0.017) as compared with bolus 5-FU (0 of 6). There was no significant difference in operative morbidity or in wound healing between patients treated with bolus 5-FU or CI or within the groups treated with low or high doses of radiation. Three patients have developed local recurrence at 14 and 24 months, two in the low-dose group treated with bolus 5-FU and one patient in the CVI group. The overall 5-year survival for the whole group is 71%. CONCLUSION: Dose intensity of 5-FU and dose of radiation correlate significantly with the likelihood of achieving a pCR. Continuous infusion 5-FU (CI) and a preoperative radiation dose of 5500 cGy or higher can achieve pCR rates of approximately 50%, even in fixed cancers of the rectum.     

5-Fluorouracil, epirubicin and cisplatin in the treatment of metastatic gastric carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 68 patients

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is one of the most common types of cancer and one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related death. The majority of gastric cancers show distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis. At present, there is no general agreement over one standard chemotherapy regimen for metastatic gastric cancer. AIMS: We evaluated the activity and toxicity of the combination of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), epirubicin and cisplatin (FEP) in previously untreated patients with metastatic gastric cancer. SETTING AND DESIGN: Medical Oncology Department of Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa; retrospective study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients received 5-FU 300 mg/m2 on Days 1-5, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 on Day 1 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on Day 1, every 4 weeks. A median of 3.5 cycles was administered. The response rate, time to disease progression, survival and toxic effects were analyzed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Overall survival and time to progression were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: There were 4 partial responses and 1 complete response (overall response rate 7.3%); 16 patients had stable disease. Median progression-free and overall survival rates were 3.1 months (95% CI 1.9-4) and 6 months (95% CI 4.2-7), respectively. The principal toxicity was myelosupression. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 27.9%, anemia in 17.6%, and thrombocytopenia in 11.7% of patients. Non-hematological toxicity was mild and manageable. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that FEP combination as used at the doses and schedules in this study has inferior activity against metastatic gastric cancer.     

Treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell head and neck carcinoma with a combination of vinorelbine, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil: A multicenter phase II trial

PURPOSE:: Vinorelbine has been demonstrated to be active against squamouscell carcinomas of the headneck (SCHNC) and lung. This multicenterphase II trial was carried out to evaluate the activity andtolerability of the combination of vinorelbine, cisplatin, and5-fluorouracil given on an outpatient schedule in a series of80 patients with recurrent SCHNC. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Eighty patients with recurrent and/ or metastatic SCHNC weretreated with a combination of CDDP 80 mg/m2 on day 1, 5-FU 600mg/m2 as a 4-hour infusion on days 2-5, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2on days 2 + 8. This cycle was repeated every 28 days. Most patientshad oral cavity, larynx, or oropharynx carcinoma (88%). Forty-sevenhad previously received surgery alone, two radiotherapy alone,and 31 surgery plus radiotherapy. Seventy-two patients had locoregionalrecurrency, and eight had distant metastases. RESULTS:: According to an intent-to-treat analysis, complete response(CR) of a mean duration of 12.7 months was achieved in 13% ofcases (95% CI 5%-21%), and partial response of 8.3+ months in45% of patients (95% CI 33%-56%), for an overall response rateof 55% (95% CI 43%-65%). Nine patients (11%) showed no change,and 22 (28%) progressed. Five patients were not evaluable forresponse and toxicity. CR were seen more frequently in patientspre-treated with only surgery than in those who had also receivedradiotherapy (15% vs. 9%; p = 0.7). No statistically significantdifferences in response rate according to site of primary tumorwere found (p = 0.8, NS). The received dose intensities of 5-FU,CDDP, and VNR were 90%, 92%, and 82%, respectively. The overallsurvival of the series as a whole was 9.7+ months (range 4-27).Toxicity was generally acceptable. Grades 3 and 4 leukopniawere recorded in 11% and 5% of patients, respectively. Noteworthywas the occurrence of pain at the tumor site after vinoreleadministration in 5 patients. CONCLUSION:: The combination regimen of CDDP, 5-FU and vinorelbine is quiteactive in the treatment of metastatic and/or recurrent SCHNC.This regimen should be tested as initial treatment in previouslyuntreated patients and compared to a standard regimen in recurrentSCHNC. head/neck cancer, vinorelbine, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, chemotherapy     

A weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)+leucovorin and bi-weekly cisplatin (CDDP) was active and well tolerated in patients with non-colon digestive carcinomas

In patients with non-colon digestive carcinomas, various schedules and doses of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin combined with cisplatin (CDDP) have been used extensively. The present study explored the toxicity and activity of a weekly 24-h infusion of high dose 5-FU modulated by high dose leucovorin with bi-weekly CDDP. 59 patients with measurable disease were treated with a weekly infusion of high dose 5-FU (2 or 2.6 g/m2)+leucovorin 500 mg/m2 for 6 weeks and a bi-weekly dose of CDDP (50 mg/m2). All patients had metastatic or locoregionally advanced disease and had a performance status < or =3. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 58 for response. Toxicity was different according to the schedule of 5-FU. Serious adverse events occurred most frequently when 5-FU was given at a dose of 2.6 g/m2 with a high incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (16%) and febrile neutropenia (13%), and led to dose reductions in both CDDP and 5-FU in 13 patients (34%). For patients who started 5-FU at a dose of 2 g/m2, no reduction in 5-FU was required, and only 4 patients required a dose reduction of CDDP (19%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 10% of patients of this group and only 1 patient required hospitalisation for febrile neutropenia. Other grade 3/4 toxicities were rare in both groups. Renal toxicity was infrequent and mild and did not require dose adjustments. The overall response rate was 33%; 19 patients achieved a partial responses (PR). No patient had a complete response (CR). The median duration of response was 5.7 months (range 2-24 months) and the median survival was 7.9 months ( range: 1-30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7-9). The combination of weekly 24-h infusion of high dose 5-FU with leucovorin and bi-weekly cisplatin seems a well-tolerated and active treatment in non-colon digestive carcinomas. A dose of 2 g/m2 of 5-FU seems to be recommended.     

FOLFOX4方案和DP(O)F方案一线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效分析

背景与目的:晚期胃癌目前尚无标准方案,FOLFOX4方案(FOLFOX4组)和DP(O)F方案[TXT L-OHP/DDP 5-FU方案,DP(O)F组]是目前临床上常用且有效的治疗胃癌的方案。本研究对比这两个方案一线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效和不良反应。方法:收集70例接受FOLFOX4方案或DP(O)F方案一线治疗的晚期胃癌患者的临床资料,其中FOLFOX4组34例,醛氢叶酸(L-OHP)85mg/m2静滴,第1天;5-FU400mg/m2静推,第1、2天,5-FU600mg/m2持续静注22h第1、2天,14d为一周期。DP(O)F组36例,多西紫杉醇(TXT)剂量强度为20mg.(m2.w)-1;DDP40mg/m2静滴,第2、3天;L-OHP100mg/m2静滴第2天;5-FU500mg/m2静滴,第1～5天,21d为一周期。结果:FOLFOX4组和DP(O)F组的客观缓解率分别为45.5%和52.8%(P=0.628);中位疾病进展时间为5.27个月和4.70个月(P=0.848);中位生存时间分别为8.97个月和12.17个月(P=0.095)。两组方案主要不良反应为血液学毒性及恶心呕吐,FOLFOX4组和DP(O)F组Ⅲ～Ⅳ度白细胞下降发生率为11.8%和36.1%(P=0.025),Ⅲ～Ⅳ度中性粒细胞下降发生率为17.6%和41.7%(P=0.038),FOLFOX4组中有1例患者死于化疗相关的肝功能衰竭。结论:FOLFOX4方案和TXT L-OHP/DDP 5FU方案一线治疗晚期胃癌疗效相近,后者血液学毒性较重。     

Bolus and infusional 5-fluorouracil combined with cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the main drug used in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Combination chemotherapy is not always superior to 5-FU alone, especially when biomodulators are also administered. In an attempt to exploit all the cytotoxic mechanisms of 5-FU, we carried out a pilot study with a double route of administration of 5-FU (intravenous bolus and continuous infusion) and a multiple modulation of 5-FU by methotrexate (MTX), 6S-leucovorin (6S-LV) and cisplatin (CDDP). A group of 30 patients affected by advanced gastric cancer was treated with MTX 50 mg/m2 and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 as an i.v. bolus on day 1, followed by a 5 day i. v. continuous infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m2/day and 6S-LV 100 mg/m2/day; on day 3 CDDP 100 mg/m2 was also administered. The regimen was repeated every 4 weeks. Six partial responses (20+/-14. 3%), 12 stable diseases (40+/-17.5%) and 12 progression (40+/-17.5%) were observed in an intent-to-treat analysis. Median survival was 7 months. All responding patients had performance status 0-1. Grade 3-4 toxicity was mainly gastrointestinal, but grade 3-4 anemia and leucopenia were also recorded. The schedule has low activity. The use of different modulators and way of administration of 5-FU does not provide advantages in advanced gastric cancer.     

Paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND: The combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered standard therapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Paclitaxel has exhibited single-agent activity in patients with this disease. The authors conducted this study to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of combining paclitaxel with cisplatin and 5-FU for patients with advanced or recurrent SCCHN. METHODS: Patients with recurrent, metastatic, or locally advanced SCCHN who had measurable or evaluable disease and no prior chemotherapy were eligible. The starting dose level consisted of paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) on Day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on Day 2, and 5-FU 1 gm/m(2)/day on Days 2-6. Due to Grade 4 mucositis, dose level 1 of 5-FU was reduced to 800 mg/m(2)/day on Days 2-6 (for 7 patients), and subsequently the 5-FU dose was adjusted to 1 gm/m(2)/day on Days 2-5 (for 17 patients). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled, with a median age of 60 years and a median Southwest Oncology Group performance status of 1. Of the 25 patients, 16 had recurrent disease, 3 had metastatic disease at diagnosis, and 6 had untreated locally advanced SCCHN. Ninety-nine courses of therapy were administered, with a median of 5 courses. Major toxicities were neutropenia and mucositis. Significant neurotoxicity or nephrotoxicity were not observed. There were two treatment-related deaths (one each due to mucositis and neutropenic pneumonia), and these precluded further dose escalation. Fifteen of the 25 patients (60%) achieved a major response. Of significance is the response rate of 58% (11 of 19 patients) in those with recurrent or metastatic disease who had a duration of response ranging from 3 to 19+ months. Two of these 19 patients continue to be in remission of 19+ and 15+ months' duration, respectively. The median survival for patients with recurrent or metastatic disease was 6 months (range, 1-26 months), with a 1-year survival rate of 37%. CONCLUSIONS: The dose and schedule for the combination of paclitaxel, 5-FU, and cisplatin as determined in this study are feasible, with encouraging outcomes and activity in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. The results of this trial warrant larger-scale evaluation to determine the role of this combination in the management of patients with this disease.     

Phase II trial of dose-dense paclitaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin with filgrastim support in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND: The current study evaluated the feasibility and clinical activity of a combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin administered on a biweekly schedule to patients with recurrent or unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). METHODS: Patients with recurrent or unresectable HNSCC were eligible if they had received a previous regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, or no previous systemic therapy. Patients received paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 on Day 1), cisplatin (35 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 2), leucovorin (200 mg/m2 on Day 1), and 5-FU (1000 mg/m2 per day as a 48-hour continuous intravenous infusion on Days 1 and 2) every 2 weeks. Patients received subcutaneous filgrastim (300 microg per day) on Days 3-9 of each cycle. Treatment was administered on an outpatient basis for a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients received a combined total of 194 treatment cycles. Eighteen complete responses (51%) and 12 partial responses (34%) were documented, for an overall response rate of 86% (30 of 35 patients). The median progression-free survival duration was 14 months, and the median overall survival duration was 18 months. Two toxicity-related deaths were documented (one due to neutropenic sepsis and the other due to catheter-related pulmonary embolism). Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in one patient. Other severe (Grade 3 or 4) toxic effects included mucositis (14%), anemia (6%), thrombosis (6%), thrombocytopenia (3%), and neuropathy (3%). CONCLUSIONS: The current dose-dense, four-agent, taxane-containing biweekly schedule was feasible and effective in patients with recurrent or unresectable HNSCC. However, given the single-center nature of the current study and the highly selected study population, further validation of these findings is recommended.     

A phase II trial of cisplatin, methotrexate, levofolinic acid, and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of patients with locally advanced, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) might improve survival with respect to radiation therapy alone. Furthermore, chemotherapy represents the only therapeutic option in metastatic head and neck carcinoma. METHODS: To improve further the results that could be obtained with an induction regimen of cisplatin (CDDP) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), the authors treated 50 patients with locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN with a combination of CDDP 65 mg/m2 on Day 1, methotrexate 500 mg/m2 on Day 1, levofolinic acid 250 mg/m2 on Day 2, and 5-FU 800 mg/m2 on Day 2. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The authors' aim was to increase the activity of CDDP plus 5-FU (PF) using a regimen that combined the three most active drugs in SCCHN and provided an adequate biochemical modulation of 5-FU, which was administered as an intravenous bolus infusion. RESULTS: Forty objective responses were observed among 50 evaluable patients (80%; 95% confidence interval [C.I.], 66-90%), including 7 complete responses (14%; 95% C.I., 5-27%), and 33 partial responses (66%; 95% C.I., 51-79%). Locoregional treatment, consisting of radiotherapy or surgery, was given at the end of chemotherapy. On completion of induction chemotherapy and locoregional treatment, 42 of 46 patients (91%) were rendered disease free. After a median follow-up of 20 months, the median duration of response was 10 months, the median failure free survival was 10 months, and the median overall survival was 21 months. The treatment was generally well tolerated. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 25 patients (50%), but it was febrile in only 3 patients. Nausea and vomiting were well managed with serotonin-3 blocking agents. Severe mucositis was seldom observed and easily manageable, and it never required hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The high level of activity, the manageable toxicity, and the noteworthy survival data of this regimen compare favorably with most of the drug combinations used worldwide to treat similar patient populations, with the additional advantage of significantly lower cost.     

Phase II study of cisplatin and dacarbazine for metastatic colorectal carcinoma resistant to 5-fluorouracil.

Twenty-six patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were given cisplatin (CDDP) and dacarbazine (DTIC). Patients who relapsed while receiving adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (FU) or had 5-FU-resistant metastatic disease were included. Median age was 52 years and the male-to-female ratio was 1. Performance status (ECOG) was 3 in 5 patients and 0-2 in the remainder. CDDP (20 mg/m2/day i.v.) and DTIC were given (250 mg/m2/day i.v.) on days 1-5. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression. Total response rate was 19.2% (95% confidence interval: 4.5-34.3%) with one clinical complete response (3.8%) and 4 partial responses (15.4%). Median response duration was 5 months. Median survival for the whole group and for responders was 6 and 8 months, respectively. In conclusion, CDDP + DTIC combination has modest activity in patients with colorectal cancer resistant to 5-FU treatment.     

High-dose intensity oxaliplatin added to the simplified bimonthly leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil regimen as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (FOLFOX 7)

This phase II study examined a regimen (FOLFOX7) of leucovorin (LV), high-dose intensity oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. 48 patients were enrolled - 36 refractory and 12 resistant to prior therapy with LV-5-FU. Oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) was infused with LV (400 mg/m2) over 2 h on day 1, followed by bolus 400 mg/m2 and a 46-h infusion (2400 g/m2) of 5-FU, every 2 weeks. Patients who responded or were stable received eight cycles. Patients were evaluated every 2 months. 20 patients (42%) had partial responses (95% confidence interval (CI): 28-56%), 19 (40%) had stable disease and 9 (19%) progressed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months and median survival 16.1 months. Toxic effects of National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) grade 3/4 were: peripheral neuropathy 15%, nausea 8%, diarrhoea 11%, neutropenia 9%, thrombocytopenia 11%. Overall, 38% of patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicities, and 64% received 90% or more of the scheduled oxaliplatin dose intensity during the first four cycles. FOLFOX7 was highly active, with good tolerability, in pretreated patients resistant to LV-5-FU [corrected].     

A randomized phase II trial of irinotecan in combination with infusional or two different bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid regimens as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Three different therapeutic regimens of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) were evaluated for efficacy and safety in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenously either: CPT-11 125 mg/m(2), FA 20 mg/m(2) followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) bolus, weekly for 4 weeks (arm A, Saltz regimen); or CPT-11 180 mg/m(2) day 1 then FA 200 mg/m(2) over 2 h and 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus and 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) 22-h infusion on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks (arm B, Douillard regimen); or CPT-11 350 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 43) alternating with FA 20 mg/m(2)/day followed by 5-FU bolus 425 mg/m(2)/day during 5 days (days 22-26) (arm C, Mayo Clinic regimen). RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were included in the study (arm A, 51 patients; arm B, 53; arm C, 50). Overall response rates for the intention-to-treat populations were 33% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21% to 48%], 42% (95% CI 28% to 56%) and 30% (95% CI 18% to 45%) for arms A, B and C, respectively. Median times to progression were 6, 8 and 7 months for arms A, B and C, respectively. Median survival times were 15, 12 and 17 months for arms A, B and C, respectively. Overall response rates for the evaluable patient populations were 40% (95% CI 24% to 58%) in arm A, 44% (95% CI 29% to 60%) in arm B and 31% (95% CI 17% to 47%) in arm C. Neutropenia was the main serious adverse event in arms A (30% of patients) and C (22% of patients) but occurred in only 8% of patients in arm B. Delayed diarrhea was the main severe adverse event for the three regimens, from 15% to 22%. CONCLUSION: All three regimens were highly active. The biweekly combination of CPT-11 and 5-FU/FA (arm B) was notable for its low incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The incidence of grade 3/4 delayed diarrhea was equivalent for the three treatment arms.     

Inflammatory breast cancer outcome with epirubicin-based induction and maintenance chemotherapy: ten-year results from the French Adjuvant Study Group GETIS 02 Trial

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the long-term efficacy and side effects in patients with nonmetastatic, unilateral, inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) who received homogeneous treatment with intensive induction chemotherapy followed by a maintenance regimen. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients were randomized to receive high-dose fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-HD) (fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2) on Days 1 to 4, epirubicin 35 mg/m(2) on Days 2 to 4, and cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m(2) on Days 2 to 4 for 4 cycles every 21 days) with or without lenograstim. Locoregional treatment consisted of surgery and/or radiotherapy. Maintenance chemotherapy was FEC 75 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 75 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) on Day 1 every 21 days for 4 cycles). No hormone treatment was allowed. RESULTS: The safety of the FEC-HD regimen was described previously. Among 102 patients who underwent surgery, a pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved by 23.5% of patients with breast tumors and by 31.4% of patients with involved axillary lymph nodes. The overall pCR rate was 14.7%. One hundred nine patients received FEC 75. After a median 10 years of follow-up, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 35.7% and 41.2%, respectively. The median DFS was 39 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 25-53 months), and the median survival was 61 months (95% CI, 43-79 months). Five patients developed a temporary decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction without congestive heart failure. In the lenograstim group, 1 patient developed acute myeloblastic leukemia M2, and 1 patient developed myelodysplastic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: FEC-HD induction chemotherapy followed by FEC 75 maintenance regimen had moderate and acute long-term toxicities and lead to high DFS and OS rates in patients with IBC.     

Treatment results of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with CDDP or CDGP plus 5-FU for carcinoma of the oropharynx and hypopharynx

Twenty-eight patients with oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal carcinoma received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with CDDP or CDGP plus 5-FU between January 2001 and April 2006. The numbers of patients according to clinical stage were stage II:2; stage III:5; stage IVa:19 ; and stage IVb:2. Total radiation dose was 60-73.8 Gy (median 66 Gy) and overall treatment time was 41-57 days (median 47 days). Two courses of 5-FU 700 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 and CDDP or CDGP 70 mg/m(2) on day 4 were administered concurrently with radiotherapy. Median follow-up period was 26 months (range, 8-64 months).The incidences of grade 3 or greater acute toxicity were leukopenia 29%, anemia 21%, thrombocytopenia 7%, pharyngeal mucositis 43% and nausea 14%. No severe late toxicity was observed. Treatment responses of primary lesions were CR in 24 patients (86%) and PR in 4 patients (14%). The two-year local control rate was 87% and the 2-year overall survival rate was 72%. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with CDDP or CDGP plus 5-FU seemed to be effective for advanced carcinomas of the oropharynx and hypopharynx.     

Randomized, open-label, phase III study of a 28-day oral regimen of eniluracil plus fluorouracil versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of eniluracil (EU)/fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study (FUMA3008) conducted in the United States and Canada compared the safety and efficacy of EU/5-FU (11.5 mg/m(2)/1.15 mg/m(2) twice daily for 28 days every 35 days) with that of intravenous 5-FU/LV (425 mg/m(2)/20 mg/m(2) once daily for 5 days every 28 days) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 981 patients were randomized and 964 patients received treatment (485 EU/5FU, 479 5FU/LV). Survival for EU/5-FU was not statistically equivalent (but not statistically inferior) to that for 5-FU/LV (hazard ratio, 0.880; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.03). Median duration of survival was 13.3 months in the EU/5-FU group and 14.5 months in the 5-FU/LV group. Median duration of progression-free survival for EU/5-FU was statistically inferior to that of the control group (20.0 weeks [95% CI, 19.1 to 20.9 weeks] v 22.7 weeks [95% CI, 18.3 to 24.6 weeks]; P =.01). Both treatments were well tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic toxicity in both groups; treatment-related grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred in 19% of patients treated with EU/5-FU and 16% of patients receiving 5-FU/LV (P =.354). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia occurred in 5% of EU/5-FU patients and 47% of 5-FU/LV patients. CONCLUSION: Safety profiles of both treatments were acceptable. Although antitumor activity was observed, EU/5-FU did not meet the protocol-specified statistical criteria for equivalence to 5-FU/LV in terms of OS.     

Phase II study of weekly oxaliplatin and 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer

To investigate the efficacy and safety of combining weekly oxaliplatin with weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) in treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic gastric cancer were studied. Oxaliplatin 65 mg m(-2) 2-h intravenous infusion, and 5-FU 2600 mg m(-2) plus FA 300 mg m(-2) 24-h intravenous infusion, were given on days 1 and 8, repeated every 3 weeks. Between January 2001 through January 2002, 55 patients were enrolled. The median age was 64 years (range: 22-75). In all, 52 patients (94.5%) had recurrent or metastatic disease and three patients had locally advanced disease. Among 50 patients evaluable for tumour response, 28 patients achieved partial response, with an overall response rate of 56% (95% confidence interval (CI): 41.8-70.3%). All 55 patients were evaluated for survival and toxicities. Median time to progression and overall survival were 5.2 and 10.0 months, respectively, during median follow-up time of 24.0 months. Major grades 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia in 23 cycles (7.1%) and thrombocytopenia in 16 cycles (5.0%). Treatment was discontinued for treatment-related toxicities in nine patients (16.4%), of whom eight were due to oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity. One patient (1.8%) died of neutropenic sepsis. This oxaliplatin-containing regimen is effective in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Except for neurotoxicity that often develops after prolonged use of oxaliplatin, the regimen is well tolerated.