Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of orientation, collimation, pitch, and tube current setting on polyp detection at multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) colonography and to determine the optimal combination of scanning parameters for screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A colectomy specimen containing 117 polyps of different sizes was insufflated and imaged with a multi-detector row CT scanner at various collimation (1.25 and 2.5 mm), pitch (3 and 6), and tube current (50, 100, and 150 mA) settings. Two-dimensional multiplanar reformatted images and three-dimensional endoluminal surface renderings from the 12 resultant data sets were examined by one observer for the presence and conspicuity of polyps. The results were analyzed with Poisson regression and logistic regression to determine the effects of scanning parameters and of specimen orientation on polyp detection. RESULTS: The percentage of polyps that were detected significantly increased when collimation (P =.008) and table feed (P =.03) were decreased. Increased tube current resulted in improved detection only of polyps with a diameter of less than 5 mm. Polyps of less than 5 mm were optimally depicted with a collimation of 1.25 mm, a pitch of 3, and a tube current setting of 150 mA; polyps with a diameter greater than 5 mm were adequately depicted with 1.25-mm collimation and with either pitch setting and any of the three tube current settings. Small polyps in the transverse segment (positioned at a 90 degrees angle to the z axis of scanning) were significantly less visible than those in parallel or oblique orientations (P <.001). The effective radiation dose, calculated with a Monte Carlo simulation, was 1.4-10.0 mSv. CONCLUSION: Detection of small polyps (<5 mm) with multi-detector row CT is highly dependent on collimation, pitch, and, to a lesser extent, tube current. Collimation of 1.25 mm, combined with pitch of 6 and tube current of 50 mA, provides for reliable detection of polyps 5 mm or larger while limiting the effective radiation dose. Polyps smaller than 5 mm, however, may be poorly depicted with use of these settings in the transverse colon.     

Protocol optimization of multidetector computed tomography colonography using pig colonic phantoms

OBJECTIVE: The introduction of multidetector computed tomography (CT) increases the possibility of enhanced polyp detection using CT colonography. The effects of collimation and tube currents on polyp detection were investigated in pig colonic phantoms to determine the optimal scanning parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty pig colons were prepared, and polyps with diameters ranging from 3 mm to 15 mm were created and randomly distributed. There was a total of 60 polyps; 20 polyps were 3 to 5 mm in size, 21 polyps 6 to 9 mm, and 19 polyps 10 to 15 mm. The pig colons were sealed, distended with air, submerged in water, and were arranged to mimic the in vivo arrangement. CT was performed using a 4-row multidetector CT scanner with collimations of 1, 2.5, and 5 mm, a pitch of 1.75, and mA of 100. A low-dose protocol (mA of 50) was added with a collimation of 1 mm. Two blinded observers independently analyzed the datasets. RESULTS:: The overall sensitivities of CT colonography were 94.2% with 1-mm collimation, 80% with 2.5-mm collimation, and 75% with 5-mm collimation. Considering the sensitivity of each protocol for the size of the polyps, the 1-mm collimation protocol had a sensitivity of 87.5% for 3- to 5-mm polyps, 95.2% sensitivity for 6- to 9-mm polyps, and 100% sensitivity for 10- to 15-mm polyps; the 2.5-mm protocol had 50%, 92.9%, and 97.4% sensitivities, respectively; and the 5-mm protocol had 47.5%, 88.1%, and 89.5% sensitivities, respectively, for the respective polyp size group. A significant difference in sensitivity among the protocols was present in the 3- to 5-mm polyps. No significant difference was seen between the standard- and the low-dose protocols. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of multidetector CT colonography for detecting polyps larger than 5 mm is robust over a range of collimation in pig colonic phantoms. However, reliable detection of polyps 5 mm or smaller requires a 1-mm collimation. Sensitivity is not influenced by lowering the mA from 100 to 50.     

Optimization of scanning parameters for CT colonography

To determine the optimal collimation, pitch and reconstruction interval for CT colonography, 10 spherical polyps between 1 mm and 10 mm diameter and made of tissue equivalent material with a CT number of 40 Hounsfield units (HU) were placed in the colon of an anthropomorphic phantom. The phantom was scanned at slice thicknesses of 3 mm, 5 mm and 7 mm and pitches of 1.0, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7 and 2.0 on an IGE Hispeed advantage system. Images were reconstructed for each scanning parameter at the minimum intervals allowed along the z-axis. The optimum scanning protocol was assessed by measuring maximum contrast between the polyp and air, sensitivity for detection of each polyp along the z-axis, and relative radiation dose. In addition, images were reviewed separately by two radiologists who graded polyp conspicuity as: 0, not seen; 1, faintly seen; 2, well seen. It was found that varying the scanning parameters caused a marked alteration in the maximum contrast between each polyp and air. For example, for the 5 mm polyp, the range of contrasts from best to worst case was 910-490 HU. It was noted that with contrasts of less than 500 HU, polyps were only faintly seen. A slice thickness of 3 mm with a pitch of 2 offers optimal polyp conspicuity with a relatively low radiation dose, we conclude that scanning parameters can be optimized for threshold contrast, radiation dose and subjective conspicuity. We propose an optimal parameter of 3 mm slice thickness and pitch 2.     

CT colonography: Protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT--study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom

PURPOSE: To determine optimal detector collimation, section thickness, and tube current for multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) colonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic colon phantom with simulated polyps of varying size (2, 6, 8, 10, and 12 mm) was examined by using multi-detector row CT with varying combinations of detector collimation (4 x 1.0 mm and 4 x 2.5 mm), dose per section (10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 140 mAs), and section thickness/reconstruction interval (1.25/0.6, 2.0/1.0, 3.0/1.0, and 5.0/2.0 mm). Polyp depiction, longitudinal polyp distortion, and presence of rippling artifacts were assessed on reformatted three-dimensional endoluminal images by three reviewers. RESULTS: Longitudinal distortion and rippling artifacts increased with increasing section thickness and use of broader detector collimation. Polyps 8 mm or larger were depicted with any combination of section thickness, detector collimation, and tube current. Depiction of polyps 6 mm or smaller depended on the detector collimation/reconstructed section thickness and was rated optimal for the 4 x 1.0-mm detector collimation with a section thickness of 1.25 mm. This was also observed for low-dose protocols. Polyps 6 mm or smaller that were not detected with 3-mm section thickness and 4 x 2.5-mm detector collimation were detected with 1.25-mm section thickness and 10 mAs. CONCLUSION: A narrow detector collimation with thin-section imaging (4 x 1.0-mm detector collimation, 1.25-mm section thickness) is a prerequisite for low-dose (10-mAs) multi-detector row CT colonography.     

Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience

Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of ultra-low-dose scanning for multislice CT colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions. Twenty-seven patients (14 men, 13 women) with clinical indication for conventional colonoscopy were recruited. Multislice spiral CT (Somatom Plus 4 Volume Zoom, Siemens, Germany) examinations were performed after standard oral colonoscopic preparation and colonic distension with room air. Images were acquired using 2.5-mm collimation, 3.0-mm slice thickness, standard reconstruction kernel, 140 kVp, and 10 mAs. Supine and prone acquisitions were obtained in all patients. Images were analyzed on a workstation by two gastrointestinal radiologists. Conventional colonoscopy was performed on the same day in all patients and represented the standard of reference. Total radiation exposure was also calculated. All colorectal cancers were correctly identified at CT colonography (9 of 9, sensitivity 100%). The CT colonography also detected 10 of 12 polyps (overall sensitivity 83.3%). Based on polyp diameter, the sensitivity for the detection of polyps 10 mm or larger was 100% (3 of 3); between 6 and 9 mm, 100% (3 of 3); and 5 mm or smaller, 66.6% (4 of 6). Total radiation exposure for prone and supine acquisitions combined was 1.7 mSv (for men) and 2.3 mSv (for women). Although preliminary, our experience suggests that ultra-low-dose scanning for multislice CT colonography is feasible. This technique provides a sensitivity comparable to that of previous experiences with CT colonography but with a 40–70% reduction of the radiation dose delivered to patients. Electronic Publication     

CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction

PURPOSE: To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of polyp detection and the image quality of computed tomographic (CT) colonography at different radiation dose levels and to study effective doses reported in literature on CT colonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT colonography and colonoscopy were performed with 100 mAs in 50 consecutive patients at high risk for colorectal cancer; 50- and 30-mAs CT colonographic examinations were simulated with controlled addition of noise to raw transmission measurements. One radiologist randomly evaluated all original and simulated images for the presence of polyps and scored image quality. Differences in image quality were assessed with the Wilcoxon rank test. Scan protocols from the literature and recent (unpublished) updates were collected. RESULTS: In nine of 10 patients with polyps 5 mm in diameter or larger (sensitivity, 90%) and in seven of 17 patients with polyps smaller than 5 mm, polyps were correctly identified with CT colonography at all dose levels. Specificity for patients without polyps 5 mm or larger was 53%-60% at all dose levels and for patients without any polyps was 26% (at 100 and 50 mAs) and 48% (at 30 mAs). Image quality decreased significantly as the dose level decreased. The median effective doses (supine and prone positions) calculated from protocols reported in the literature and updates were 7.8 and 8.8 mSv, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although image quality decreases significantly at 30 mAs (3.6 mSv), polyp detection remains unimpaired. The median dose for CT colonography at institutions that perform CT colonographic research is currently 8.8 mSv.     

Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare thin-section low-dose multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred five patients underwent CT colonography immediately before colonoscopy. Supine and prone CT colonographic acquisitions to image the region during a 30-second breath hold were performed. CT colonographic images were prospectively interpreted for the presence, location, size, and morphologic features of polyps. The time of image interpretation was noted. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CT colonography were calculated, with 95% CIs, by using colonoscopic findings as the reference standard. The weighted CT dose index was calculated on the basis of measurements in a standard body phantom. Effective dose was calculated by using commercially available software. RESULTS: Median CT data interpretation time was 12 minutes. One hundred thirty-two polyps in 59 patients were identified at colonoscopy; no polyps were detected in 46 patients. Sensitivities for detection of polyps smaller than 5 mm, 6-9 mm, and larger than 10 mm in diameter were 12% (11 of 91 polyps), 70% (19 of 27 polyps), and 93% (13 of 14 polyps), respectively. Estimated overall specificity was 97.7% (515 of 527 imaging results). The total weighted CT dose index for combined supine and prone CT colonography was 11.4 mGy. The effective doses for combined CT colonography were 5.0 mSv and 7.8 mSv for men and women, respectively. CONCLUSION: Low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography has excellent sensitivity and specificity for detection of colorectal neoplasms 10 mm and larger.     

Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of lower-dose multi-detector row helical computed tomographic (CT) colonography with that of conventional colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight patients underwent multi-detector row helical CT colonography (beam collimation, 4 x 2.5 mm; table feed, 17.5 mm/sec; voltage, 140 kV; and effective dose, 10 mAs) followed by conventional colonoscopy. Conventional colonoscopy served as the reference standard. Two radiologists interpreted CT colonographic images to assess the presence of polyps or carcinomas. Sensitivity was calculated on both a per-polyp and a per-patient basis. In the latter, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were also calculated. Weighted CT dose index was calculated on the basis of measurements obtained in a standard body phantom. Effective dose was estimated by using commercially available software. RESULTS: CT colonography correctly depicted all 22 carcinomas (sensitivity, 100%) and 52 of 74 polyps (sensitivity, 70.3%). Sensitivity for detection was 100% in all 13 polyps 10 mm or larger in diameter, 83.3% in 20 of 24 polyps 6-9 mm, and 51.3% in 19 of 37 lesions 5 mm or smaller. With regard to the per-patient analysis, CT colonography had a sensitivity of 96.0%, a specificity of 96.6%, a positive predictive value of 94.1%, and a negative predictive value of 97.7%. The total weighted CT dose index for combined prone and supine acquisitions was 2.74 mGy. The simulated effective doses for complete CT colonography were 1.8 mSv in men and 2.4 mSv in women. CONCLUSION: Lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography ensures substantial dose reduction while maintaining excellent sensitivity for detection of colorectal carcinomas and polyps larger than 6 mm in diameter.     

Optimization of the technique of virtual colonoscopy using a multislice spiral computerized tomography

PURPOSE: To optimize scanning parameters for virtual colonoscopy utilizing a multislice Helical CT scanner in an in vitro study (using a homemade colonic phantom) and in a preliminary clinical study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A colonic phantom was built using a plastic tube and 12 plastiline polyps were placed inside. The colonic phantom was studied with a multislice Helical CT scanner. Axial images were obtained with the phantom parallel to the long axis of the moving table (in order to simulate the evaluation of ascending and descending colon): oblique images were acquired with the phantom at 45 degrees relative to the long axis of the moving table (in order to simulate the evaluation of sigmoid colon and colonic flexures). Four different scanning protocols were tested: 1) slice collimation, 5 mm; slice width, 7 mm; table speed, 25 mm; reconstruction index, 5 mm; 2) slice collimation, 2.5 mm; slice width, 3 mm; table speed, 15 mm; reconstruction index, 3 mm; 3) slice collimation, 1 mm; slice width, 1.25 mm; table speed, 5 mm; reconstruction index, 1 mm; 4) slice collimation, 1 mm; slice width, 1.25 mm; table speed, 4 mm; reconstruction index, 1 mm. Quantitative analysis consisted in evaluation of the number of identified polyps and polyp size along the longitudinal axis. Qualitative analysis consisted in the evaluation of image artifacts and quality of 3D reconstructed images (step artifacts and polyp geometry distortion). This preliminary clinical study was performed in 12 patients (7 men and 5 women) who underwent multislice Helical CT colonography. We selected patients with clinical indications for conventional colonoscopy or after unsuccessful conventional colonoscopy. RESULTS: Multislice Helical CT colonography was 100% sensitive in the detection of all polyps and in all scanning protocols. With oblique scans, only a 3-mm polyp was missed during protocol 1 (sensitivity: 92%). Polyp geometry distortion was observed on longitudinal reconstructions, whereas no distortion was seen on axial images. Image quality was graded as optimal for protocols 2, 3, and 4; protocol 1 was graded as good on transverse scans and as poor on oblique scans. In our preliminary clinical study, two colonic carcinomas and three polyps were identified. CONCLUSIONS: At present, the introduction of multislice technology in virtual colonoscopy permits to improve spatial resolution and image definition. The actual clinical advantage, in terms of increased diagnostic accuracy, needs further investigation in larger clinical studies.     

Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic (CT) colonography for colorectal polyp and cancer detection by using colonoscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred patients underwent CT colonography followed by standard colonoscopy. Bowel preparation consisted of magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol. After colonic air insufflation, patients underwent scanning in the supine and prone positions with 3-mm collimation during a single breath hold. The transverse CT images, sagittal and coronal reformations, and three-dimensional endoluminal images were interpreted by two radiologists independently, and then a consensus reading was performed. CT colonographic findings were correlated with standard colonoscopic and histologic findings. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for polyp detection were 90.1% (164 of 182) and 72.0% (85 of 118), respectively. By using direct polyp matching, the overall sensitivity was 69.7% (365 of 524). The sensitivity was 90% (74 of 82) for the detection of polyps 10 mm or larger, 80.1% (113 of 141) for polyps 5.0-9.9 mm, and 59.1% (178 of 301) for polyps smaller than 5 mm. The sensitivity was 94% (64 of 68) for the detection of adenomas 10 mm or larger, 82% (72 of 88) for adenomas 5.0-9.9 mm, and 66.9% (95 of 142) for adenomas smaller than 5 mm. CT colonography was used to identify all eight carcinomas. CONCLUSION: CT colonography has excellent sensitivity for the detection of clinically important colorectal polyps and cancer.     

Influence of detector collimation and beam pitch for identification and image quality of ground-glass attenuation and nodules on 16- and 64-detector row CT systems: experimental study using chest phantom

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to determine the influence of detector collimation and beam pitch for identification and image quality of ground-glass attenuation (GGA) and nodules on 16- and 64-detector row CTs, by using a commercially available chest phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A chest CT phantom including simulated GGAs and nodules was scanned with different detector collimations, beam pitches and tube currents. The probability and image quality of each simulated abnormality was visually assessed with a five-point scoring system. ROC-analysis and ANOVA were then performed to compare the identification and image quality of either protocol with standard values. RESULTS: Detection rates of low-dose CTs were significantly reduced when tube currents were set at 40mA or less by using detector collimation 16 and 64x0.5mm and 16 and 32mmx1.0mm for low pitch, and at 100mA or less by using detector collimation 16 and 64x0.5mm and 16 and 32mmx1.0mm for high pitch (p<0.05). Image qualities of low-dose CTs deteriorated significantly when tube current was set at 100mA or less by using detector collimation 16 and 64x0.5mm and 16 and 32x1.0mm for low pitch, and at 150mA or less by using detector collimation 16 and 64x0.5mm and 16 and 32x1.0mm for high pitch (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Detector collimation and beam pitch were important factors for the image quality and identification of GGA and nodules by 16- and 64-detector row CT.     

Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography

PURPOSE: To determine if intravenously administered contrast material improves overall reader confidence in the assessment of the colon, large-bowel wall conspicuity, and diagnostic accuracy in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancers at computed tomographic (CT) colonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients underwent CT colonography in both supine and prone positions. A five-point scale was used to assess the effect of contrast enhancement on overall reader confidence and bowel wall conspicuity. Eighty-one patients underwent CT colonography with complete colonoscopic or surgical correlation; diagnostic accuracy was compared in 48 patients who received contrast material and 33 who did not. RESULTS: Bowel preparation was ideal in 38 (19%) of 200 patients. Enhanced prone CT images had significantly better scores for reader confidence (4.9 +/- 0.1 vs 4.6 +/- 0.1, P: <.005) and bowel wall conspicuity (4.6 +/- 0.2 vs 4.2 +/- 0.2, P: <.005) compared with those of nonenhanced prone images despite no significant difference in bowel distention (3.8 +/- 0.2 vs 3.9 +/- 0. 1, P: =.8). Enhancement significantly improved the ability to depict medium (6-9-mm) polyps (75% vs 58%, P: <.05). Three large (10-19-mm) polyps were detected only with contrast enhancement; two remained submerged despite dual positioning. CONCLUSION: The use of intravenously administered contrast material significantly improved reader confidence in the assessment of bowel wall conspicuity and the ability of CT colonography to depict medium polyps in suboptimally prepared colons.     

电子束CT内镜结肠模拟息肉的实验研究

目的：评价电子束ＣＴ模拟内镜探查猪息肉模型的敏感性。材料和方法：取长１５ｃｍ—２５ｃｍ的猪结肠制做３ｍｍ、７ｍｍ、１０ｍｍ直径大小的息肉模型；分别使结肠纵轴与扫描架成０，４５和９０进行扫描，评价二维和三维图象显示息肉的敏感性。结果：１０ｍｍ直径的息肉三维图象和二维图象均能清晰显示，３ｍｍ直径息肉三维较二维显示更清晰（Ｐ＜０．０５）。结论：ＣＴ模拟内窥镜有助于发现小的息肉病变     

Evaluation of image quality and lesion perception by human readers on 3D CT colonography: comparison of standard and low radiation dose

Aims

We compared the prevalence of noise-related artefacts and lesion perception on three-dimensional (3D) CT colonography (CTC) at standard and low radiation doses.

Methods

Forty-eight patients underwent CTC (64?×?0.625 mm collimation; tube rotation time 0.5 s; automatic tube current modulation: standard dose 40–160 mA, low dose 10–50 mA). Low- and standard-dose acquisitions were performed in the supine position, one after the other. The presence of artefacts (cobblestone and snow artefacts, irregularly delineated folds) and the presence of polyps were evaluated by five radiologists on 3D images at standard dose, the original low dose and a modified low dose, i.e. after manipulation of opacity on 3D.

Results

The mean effective dose was 3.9?±?1.3 mSv at standard dose and 1.03?±?0.4 mSv at low dose. The number of images showing cobblestone artefacts and irregularly delineated folds at original and modified low doses was significantly higher than at standard dose (P?<?0.0001). Most of the artefacts on modified low-dose images were mild. No significant difference in sensitivity between the dose levels was found for polyps ≥6 mm.

Conclusions

Reduction of the effective dose to 1 mSv significantly affects image quality on 3D CTC, but the perception of ≥6 mm lesions is not significantly impaired.     

Colon dissection: a new three-dimensional reconstruction tool for computed tomography colonography

PURPOSE: To improve the sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) colonography in the detection of polyps by comparing the 3D reconstruction tool "colon dissection" and endoluminal view (virtual colonoscopy) with axial 2D reconstructions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients (22 M, 26 F, mean age 57 +/- 21) were studied after intra-anal air insufflation in the supine and prone positions using a 16-slice helical CT (16 x 0.625 mm, pitch 1.7; detector rotation time 0.5 s; 160 mAs und 120 kV) and conventional colonoscopy. Two radiologists blinded to the results of the conventional colonoscopy analyzed the 3D reconstruction in virtual-endoscopy mode, in colon-dissection mode, and axial 2D slices. RESULTS: Conventional colonoscopy revealed a total of 35 polyps in 15 patients; 33 polyps were disclosed by CT methods. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting colon polyps were 94% and 94%, respectively, when using the "colon dissection", 89% and 94% when using "virtual endoscopy", and 62% and 100% when using axial 2D reconstruction. Sensitivity in relation to the diameter of colon polyps with "colon dissection", "virtual colonoscopy", and axial 2D-slices was: polyps with a diameter >5.0 mm, 100%, 100%, and 71%, respectively; polyps with a diameter of between 3 and 4.9 mm, 92%, 85%, and 46%; and polyps with a diameter < 3 mm, 89%, 78%, and 56%. The difference between "virtual endoscopy" and "colon dissection" in diagnosing polyps up to 4.9 mm in diameter was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: 3D reconstruction software "colon dissection" improves sensitivity of CT colonography compared with the endoluminal view.     

Must radiation dose for CT of the maxilla and mandible be higher than that for conventional panoramic radiography?

We evaluated the feasibility of performing preoperative spiral CT of the maxilla and mandible with a radiation dose similar to that used for conventional panoramic radiography. The skin entrance doses of radiation used for spiral CT (collimation, 1 mm; pitch, 2; tube voltage, 80 kV; tube current, 40 mA) and for panoramic radiography (75 kV, 8 mA, 15 seconds) were measured in one patient by using thermoluminescent dosimeter chips. Results were 0.56 +/- 0.06 mGy for CT and 0.59 +/- 0.04 mGy for radiography. Image quality was adequate for preoperative implant planning. Spiral CT of the mandible and maxilla may therefore be feasible with a radiation dose of similar magnitude as that used for conventional panoramic radiography.     

Low-dose, volumetric helical CT: image quality, radiation dose, and usefulness for evaluation of bronchiectasis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to assess the image quality, radiation dose, and clinical applicability of low-dose, volumetric helical CT in the evaluation of bronchiectasis. METHODS: Volumetric helical CT scans (120 kVp, 3-mm collimation, pitch of 2, and reconstruction interval of 2 mm) were obtained through the thorax at four levels of tube current: 150, 100, 70, and 40 mA. There were a total of 12 patients who underwent CT scan either for suspected bronchiectasis or for lung cancer screening, with three patients allocated to each current level. Five radiologists assessed and compared image quality of the helical CT scans obtained at the various exposure levels. Radiation doses of helical CT performed with four different current settings and of high-resolution CT (120 kVp, 170 mA, 1-mm collimation, and 10-mm intervals) were measured. The diagnostic usefulness of the 40-mA helical CT images was compared with that of high-resolution CT by two observers in 52 patients with known or suspected airway diseases. RESULTS: With helical CT, there was no significant difference in image quality among the four different levels of current (P > 0.05). Radiation doses associated with the 40-, 70-, 100-, and 150-mA helical techniques were 3.21 mGy (range, 3.02-3.57), 4.81 mGy (range, 3.89-5.93), 6.46 mGy (range, 6.01-7.31), and 10.4 mGy (range, 8.93-12.1), respectively, whereas that of high-resolution CT was 2.17 mGy (range, 1.90-2.67). Of 52 patients, 44.5 and 47 patients (the mean of positive interpretations by the five observers) were diagnosed with bronchiectasis at high-resolution and low-dose helical CT, respectively. Of 928 segments, bronchiectasis was seen in 152.5 segments on high-resolution CT and in 193.5 segments on helical CT. The interobserver agreement (k-values) was acceptable for both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: With acceptable images and similar radiation dose, low-dose volumetric helical CT at 40 mA may offer more information than does high-resolution CT in the evaluation of bronchiectasis.     

Polyp detection with MDCT: a phantom-based evaluation of the impact of dose and spatial resolution

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of dose and spatial resolution on the detection of colonic polyps using a 4-MDCT scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four latex phantoms that simulate the large bowel and contain artificial polyps of different sizes and shapes were constructed. The polyps were divided into three size groups (diameter, 0-2, 2-5, and 5-10 mm) and were classified into four shape groups: pedunculated; broad-based; ulcerated or depressed; and sessile or flat. The colon phantoms were submerged in a water tank and scanned on a 4-MDCT scanner using 12 protocols with various settings of slice thickness, pitch, and tube current. The images were independently evaluated by three radiologists using axial 2D multiplanar reconstruction images and a 3D surface-rendering technique (fly-through). RESULTS: At a constant dose (i.e., dose-length product [DLP]), the polyp detection rate increased with increasing axial spatial resolution. For the standard protocol (2.50-mm slice thickness, 1.5 pitch), the detection rate for all polyp sizes decreased from approximately 70% at 100 mA to 55% at 40 mA. Between a 60- and 100-mA tube current, the detection rate for the largest polyps (> 5 mm) was almost constant, close to 90%. CONCLUSION: The detection of polyps in the large bowel using a standard protocol can be improved without dose penalty by increasing the axial spatial resolution of the image acquisition and adjusting the tube current setting. If the analysis can be restricted to polyps larger than 5 mm, the dose can be substantially reduced without compromising the detection rate.     

CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated CT colonography as a method to stage colorectal cancer and detect polyps and cancers in patients with the disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive patients thought to have colorectal cancer underwent CT colonography, following a colonoscopy, in both the prone and supine positions. The transverse CT images, multiplanar reconstruction, volume rendered, and virtual colonoscopy images, were independently interpreted by two radiologists. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The diagnostic accuracy of TNM staging was calculated, and the sensitivity of CT colonography for the detection of cancers and polyps, compared with that of colonoscopy, was calculated using repeated colonoscopic and surgical findings as reference standards. The technical result for distention was also graded. RESULTS: In the 51 patients, surgery and follow-up colonoscopy revealed 21 colorectal cancers (one synchronous cancer) and 41 polyps. The diagnostic accuracies of CT colonography for TNM staging were 95%, 85%, and 100% for tumor, node, and metastasis, respectively. The sensitivity of both CT colonography and initial colonoscopy for cancer detection was 100%. The overall sensitivities of CT colonography and initial colonoscopy for polyp detection were 90% and 78%, respectively (p = 0.001). The sensitivities of CT colonography for detecting polyps of 5 mm or smaller, of 6-9 mm, and of 10 mm or larger were 84%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. The mean overall technical results for the supine and prone positions were ranked as 2.80 (SD, +/- 0.4) and 2.78 (+/- 0.4), respectively, but were without statistical significance (p = 0.781). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggest that for patients with clinical suspicion of colorectal cancer, CT colonoscopy is valuable in staging the tumor and in detecting additional polyps or cancers in areas not evaluated by conventional colonoscopy.     

Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether a new virtual colon dissection 3D visualization technique for CT colonography has a shorter analysis time and better sensitivity for detection of colonic polyps than interpretation of axial CT images. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. CT colonography was performed in 22 patients using 4-MDCT followed by conventional colonoscopy on the same day. The CT colonography data sets were analyzed by virtual colon dissection, which virtually bisects and unfolds the colon along its longitudinal axis to inspect the inner colonic surface for polyps. The same CT data sets were independently evaluated using axial interpretation. All data sets were independently interpreted by two radiologists in a blinded manner. RESULTS: Conventional colonoscopy revealed 31 colonic lesions in 20 patients. Twenty two of the lesions were smaller than 10 mm; nine were 10 mm or larger. Two of the original 22 patients were excluded, one because of residual stool and fluid and the other because of an impassable stenosing rectal wall cancer. For virtual colon dissection, the per-lesion sensitivity was 42% for observer 1 and 68% for observer 2; for axial interpretation, the respective sensitivities were 48% and 61%. For polyps 10 mm or larger, the respective sensitivities were 67% and 89% for virtual colon dissection and 89% and 100% for axial interpretation. The average time for reconstruction and analysis of virtual colon dissection was 36.8 min versus 29.2 min for axial images. Virtual colon dissection was feasible in both the supine and the prone positions in 45.5% of colonic segments, in either the supine or the prone position in 24.5%, and in neither position in 30% of segments. CONCLUSION: Although virtual colon dissection may facilitate detection of colonic polyps in isolated cases, its detection rate is not superior to axial interpretation, which is mainly attributable to failed rendering of insufficiently distended colonic segments or regions with residual feces. Virtual colon dissection is also the more time-consuming of the two procedures. With further improvement of path-finding and image segmentation, however, virtual colon dissection has the potential to be a useful interpretation tool for CT colonography.