Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer–Specific Mortality in Men With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer

BackgroundMen with low-risk prostate cancer (CaP) are considered unlikely to die of CaP and have the option of active surveillance. This study evaluated whether African American (AA) men who present with low-risk disease are at higher risk for death from CaP than white men.Patients and MethodsThe authors identified 56,045 men with low-risk CaP (T1-T2a, Gleason score ≤ 6, prostate-specific antigen ≤ 10 ng/mL) diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Fine-Gray competing-risks regression analyses were used to analyze the effect of race on prostate cancer–specific mortality (PCSM) after adjusting for known prognostic and sociodemographic factors in 51,315 men (43,792 white; 7523 AA) with clinical follow-up information available.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 46 months, 258 patients (209 [0.48%] white and 49 [0.65%] AA men) died from CaP. Both AA race (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.03-2.05; P = .032) and noncurative management (AHR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15-1.95; P = .003) were significantly associated with an increased risk of PCSM. When analyzing only patients who underwent curative treatment, AA race (AHR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.04-2.53; P = .034) remained significantly associated with increased PCSM.ConclusionAmong men with low-risk prostate cancer, AA race compared with white race was associated with a higher risk of PCSM, raising the possibility that clinicians may need to exercise caution when recommending active surveillance for AA men with low-risk disease. Further studies are needed to ultimately determine whether guidelines for active surveillance should take race into account.     

Influence of Sociodemographic Factors on Treatment Decisions in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionIn stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), survival has significantly improved. Despite such trends, it has been noted that patients frequently refuse treatment. Therefore, we explored the factors associated with treatment refusal in NSCLC.Patients and MethodsUtilizing the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we identified all stage IV NSCLC cases from 2004 to 2014. Patients who received cancer treatment outside of the reporting facility were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine associations with treatment refusal.ResultsA total of 341,993 patients were identified; 5.4% of patients refused radiotherapy and 10.3% refused chemotherapy despite provider recommendations. The proportion of patients refusing radiotherapy and chemotherapy increased over time from 4.2% to 7.3% and 7.9% to 15%, respectively (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, men were less likely to refuse treatment compared to women (respectively, odds ratio = 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.76–0.84; P < .001; odds ratio = 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.80–0.85; P < .001, respectively). Factors associated with radiotherapy refusal included: Medicaid or Medicare as primary insurance, uninsured status, low household median income, and lower educational level. Regarding chemotherapy, uninsured patients, Medicaid patients, and patients with a high comorbidity index were more likely to refuse chemotherapy. Asians had lower rates of chemotherapy refusal relative to non-Hispanic whites. Non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics, and Asians had increasing chemotherapy refusal rates over time, while non-Hispanic blacks had less pronounced trends over time.ConclusionSocioeconomic factors rather than race/ethnicity appear to influence the refusal of cancer treatment in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Assessing socioeconomic challenges should be an essential part of patient evaluation when discussing treatment options.     

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

BackgroundAlthough race and socioeconomic factors are associated with outcome in many malignancies, few studies have examined the effect of race and socioeconomic status on patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).Patients and MethodsWe used the National Cancer Database to identify patients with MCL diagnosed between 2004 and 2013. We used χ² and analysis of variance to assess associations of covariates with race/ethnicity. For univariate and multivariable analyses of overall survival (OS) we used Cox proportional hazards models. OS from the time of diagnosis was the primary end point.ResultsOf 18,120 MCL patients, 14,984 (83%) were white non-Hispanic (NH), 709 (4%) black NH, and 1096 (6%) Hispanic. Of these patients, 6798 (39%) had private insurance, 9520 (55%) Medicare, and 635 (4%) Medicaid. Compared with white NH race, black race was associated with treatment at an academic/research program (347 of 681 patients [51%] vs. 5577 of 14,851 [38%]), B symptoms (196 patients [28%] vs. 3 [25%]), Medicaid/uninsured status (101 patients [15%] vs. 642 [5%]), and residence in regions with lower average education and income (all P < .001). Compared with NH black and Hispanic patients, more white NH patients received stem cell transplantation (73 patients [10%] vs. 114 [10%] vs. 1891 [13%]; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, Hispanic ethnicity, private insurance, and treatment at an academic center were associated with better OS (5-year OS 55.8%, 66.2%, and 56.6%, respectively), whereas black race was associated with inferior OS (5-year OS 46.8%).ConclusionWe identified disparities according to race and ethnicity in OS, independent of insurance and socioeconomic status. Further assessment of treatment patterns might elucidate new targets for improving access to care and health outcomes for rare cancers.     

Colorectal Cancer Screening Disparities Among Race: A Zip Code Level Analysis

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) screening can prevent disease by early identification. Existing disparities in CRC screening have been associated with factors including race, socioeconomic status, insurance, and even geography. Our study takes a deeper look into how social determinants related to zip code tabulation areas affect CRC screenings.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of CRC screenings by race at a zip code level, evaluating for impactful social determinant factors such as the social deprivation index (SDI). We used publicly available data from CDC 500 Cities Project (2016-2019), PLACES Project (2020), and the American Community Survey (2019). We conducted multivariate and confirmatory factor analyses among race, income, health insurance, check-up visits, and SDI.ResultsIncreasing the tertile of SDI was associated with a higher likelihood of being Black or Hispanic, as well as decreased median household income (P < .01). Lower rates of regular checkup visits were found in the third tertile of SDI (P < .01). The multivariate analysis showed that being Black, Hispanic, lower income, being uninsured, lack of regular check-ups, and increased SDI were related to decreased CRC screening. In the confirmatory factor analysis, we found that SDI and access to insurance were the variables most related to decreased CRC screening.ConclusionOur results reveal the top 2 factors that impact a locality's CRC screening rates are the social deprivation index and access to health care. This data may help implement interventions targeting social barriers to further promote CRC screenings within disadvantaged communities and decrease overall mortality via early screening.     

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Bladder Cancer Survival: Analysis of the California Cancer Registry

PurposeTo examine the California Cancer Registry (CCR) for bladder cancer survival disparities based on race, socioeconomic status (SES), and insurance in California patients.Patients and MethodsThe CCR was queried for bladder cancer cases in California from 1988 to 2012. The primary outcome was disease-specific survival (DSS), defined as the time interval from date of diagnosis to date of death from bladder cancer. Survival analyses were performed to determine the prognostic significance of racial and socioeconomic factors.ResultsA total of 72,452 cases were included (74.5% men, 25.5% women). The median age was 72 years (range, 18-109 years). The racial distribution among the patients was 81% white, 3.8% black, 8.8% Hispanic, 5.2% Asian, and 1.2% from other races. In black patients, tumors presented more frequently with advanced stage and high grade. Medicaid patients tended to be younger and had more advanced-stage, higher-grade tumors compared to patients with Medicare or managed care (P < .0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly poorer 5-year DSS in black, low SES, and Medicaid patients (P < .0001). When controlling for stage, grade, age, and gender, multivariate analysis revealed that black race (DSS hazard ratio = 1.295; 95% confidence interval, 1.212-1.384), low SES (DSS hazard ratio = 1.325; 95% confidence interval, 1.259-1.395), and Medicaid insurance (DSS hazard ratio = 1.349; 95% confidence interval, 1.246-1.460) were independent prognostic factors (P < .0001).ConclusionAn analysis of the CCR demonstrated that black race, low SES, and Medicaid insurance portend poorer DSS. These findings reflect a multifaceted socioeconomic and public health conundrum, and efforts to reduce inequalities should be pursued.     

Association of Low Socioeconomic Status With Adverse Prostate Cancer Pathology Among African American Men Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy

BackgroundWe tested for associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and adverse prostate cancer pathology in a population of African American (AA) men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from 2 institutions for AA men who underwent RP between 2010 and 2015. Household incomes were estimated using census tract data, and patients were stratified into income groups relative to the study population median. Pathologic outcomes after RP were assessed, including the postsurgical Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA-S) score and a definition of adverse pathology (stage ≥ pT3, Gleason score ≥ 4+3, or positive lymph nodes), and compared between income groups.ResultsWe analyzed data of 347 AA men. Median household income was $37,954. Low-SES men had significantly higher prostate-specific antigen values (mean 10.2 vs. 7.3; P < .01) and CAPRA-S scores (mean 3.4 vs. 2.5; P < .01), more advanced pathologic stage (T3-T4 31.8% vs. 21.5%; P = .03), and higher rates of seminal vesicle invasion (17.3% vs. 8.2%; P < .01), positive surgical margins (35.3% vs. 22.1%; P < .01), and adverse pathology (41.4% vs. 30.1%; P = .03). Linear and logistic regression showed significant inverse associations of SES with CAPRA-S score (P < .01) and adverse pathology (P = .03).ConclusionIn a population of AA men who underwent RP, we observed an independent association of low SES with advanced stage or aggressive prostate cancer. By including only patients in a single racial demographic group, we eliminated the potential confounding effect of race on the association between SES and prostate cancer risk. These findings suggest that impoverished populations might benefit from more intensive screening and early, aggressive treatment of prostatic malignancies.     

Insurance status and survival disparities among nonelderly rectal cancer patients in the National Cancer Data Base

BACKGROUND:

Among patients with colorectal cancer, insurance status is associated with disparities in survival as well as differences in stage and treatment. The role of stage and treatment differences in these survival disparities is not clear because insurance status is also strongly correlated with race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and other factors.

METHODS:

The authors used data from the National Cancer Data Base, a national hospital‐based cancer registry, to examine insurance status and other factors related to survival among 19,154 rectal cancer patients aged 18 to 64 years. The authors examined the impact of 10 factors on 5‐year survival: age, sex, race/ethnicity, histologic grade, histologic subtype, neighborhood education and income levels, facility type, stage, and treatment.

RESULTS:

Adjusted only for age, the hazard ratio (HR) for death at 5 years was 1.00 (referent) among privately insured patients, 2.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.89‐2.23) among Medicaid‐insured patients, and 2.01 (95% CI, 1.84‐2.19) among uninsured patients. After adjustment for all factors other than stage and treatment, the HRs were 1.88 (95% CI, 1.722.04) for Medicaid‐insured patients and 1.84 (95% CI, 1.69‐2.01) for uninsured patients. After further adjustment for stage and treatment, the HRs were 1.34 (95% CI, 1.22‐1.46) for Medicaid‐insured patients and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.18‐1.42) for uninsured patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

After adjustment for age, further adjustment for 9 other factors reduced the excess mortality among rectal cancer patients without private insurance by approximately 70%. Disparities in stage and treatment accounted for approximately 53% of the excess mortality, whereas factors other than stage and treatment accounted for approximately 17%. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Socioeconomic factors and survival in patients with non‐metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The effect of socioeconomic factors on receipt of definitive treatment and survival outcomes in non‐metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unclear. Eligible patients (n = 37 995) were identified from the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2007 and 2012. Socioeconomic factors (i.e., median household income, education level, unemployment rate, insurance status, marital status and residence) were included in univariate/multivariate Cox regression analysis; validated factors were used to generate nomograms for cause‐specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), and a prognostic score model for risk stratification. Low‐ and high‐risk groups were compared for all cancer subsites. Impact of race/ethnicity on survival was investigated in each risk group. Marital status, median household income and insurance status were included in the nomograms for CSS and OS, which had higher c‐indexes than the 6th edition TNM staging system (all P < 0.001). Based on three disadvantageous socioeconomic factors (i.e., unmarried status, uninsured status, median household income <US $65 394), the prognostic score model generated four risk subgroups with scores of 0, 1, 2 or 3, which had significantly separated CSS/OS curves (all P < 0.001). Low‐risk patients (score 0–1) were more likely to receive definitive treatment and obtain better CSS/OS than high‐risk patients (score 2–3). Chinese and non‐Hispanic black patients with high‐risk socioeconomic status had best and poorest CSS/OS, respectively. Therefore, marital status, median household income and insurance status have significance for predicting survival outcomes. Low‐risk socioeconomic status and Chinese race/ethnicity confer protective effects in HNSCC.     

Patient Demographic Characteristics and Disease Stage as Drivers of Disparities in Mortality in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Receive Care at a Safety Net Academic Medical Center

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to examine the effect of patient demographic characteristics and tumor stage at diagnosis on mortality in prostate cancer patients who receive care at a safety net, academic medical center with a diverse patient population.Patients and MethodsEight hundred sixty-nine patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer at our institution between August 2004 and October 2011. Patient demographic characteristics were determined as follows: race and/or ethnicity, primary language, insurance type, age at diagnosis, marital status, income (determined by zip code), and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor stage. Fisher exact or Pearson χ² test was used to test for differences in categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors related to mortality recorded at the end of follow-up in March of 2012.ResultsMortality was significantly decreased in patients who spoke Haitian Creole (odds ratio [OR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.74; P = .017). Distribution of insurance type, age, income, and prostate-specific antigen level differed between English and Haitian Creole speakers. Increased mortality was observed in patients who were single (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.06-3.73; P = .032), older than 70 (OR, 15.5; 95% CI, 3.03-79.45; P = .001), had Medicaid and/or free care (OR, 4.98; 95% CI, 1.72-14.4; P = .003), or had AJCC stage IV cancer (OR, 9.56; 95% CI, 4.89-18.69; P < .001). There was no significant difference in mortality according to race and/or ethnicity or income in the multivariate-adjusted model.ConclusionIn this retrospective study, prostate cancer patients who spoke Haitian Creole had a lower incidence of mortality compared with English speakers. Consistent with similar large-scale studies, being single or having Medicaid and/or free care insurance predicted worse outcomes, reinforcing their roles as drivers of disparities.     

Prostate Cancer Detection by Using Digital Rectal Examination: Contemporary Practice Patterns in the United States

BackgroundDigital rectal examination (DRE) may play an important role as a secondary method of prostate cancer detection if prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening decreases. Current practice patterns in the use of DRE are not well defined, and potential variations in its use among different subgroups of men are unclear.Materials and MethodsThe Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System was examined for the year 2010. All men aged 40 years old or older were asked if they ever had a rectal examination to check their prostate and the date of their last examination. Men who reported having had a DRE within the past 12 months were considered up to date. The proportion of men who reported having had a DRE and independent demographic and socioeconomic predictors for having had a DRE were determined.ResultsA total of 110,661 respondents were included: 72.2% of respondents reported ever having had a DRE; 36.8% had had a DRE within the past year, and 49.7% within the past 2 years. On multivariate analysis for reporting having an up-to-date DRE, older men, those with higher body mass index, and those of black race were more likely to have an up-to-date DRE. Asian or Hispanic race, divorced or widowed marital status, lower education, lower income, and lack of health insurance were independently associated with being less likely to have an up-to-date DRE.ConclusionsOf American men, 36.8% reported having an up-to-date DRE within the past year and 49.7% of men within the past 2 years. Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics were strongly associated with the likelihood of having an up-to-date DRE.     

Differences in outcome for patients with cholangiocarcinoma: Racial/ethnic disparity or socioeconomic factors?

BackgroundInequities in cancer survival are well documented. Whether disparities in overall survival (OS) result from inherent racial differences in underlying disease biology or socioeconomic factors (SEF) is not known. Our aim was to define the association of race/ethnicity and SEF with OS in pts with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).MethodsPatients with CCA of all sites and stages in the National Cancer Data Base (2004-13) were included. Racial/ethnic groups were defined as non-Hispanic White (NH-W), non-Hispanic Black (NH-B), Asian, and Hispanic. Income and education were based on census data for patients’ zip code. Income was defined as high (≥$63,000) vs low (<$63,000). Primary outcome was OS.Results27,151 patients were included with a mean age of 68 yrs; 51% were male. 78% were NH-W, 8% NH-B, 8% Hispanic, and 6% Asian. 56% had Medicare, 33% private insurance, 7% Medicaid, and 4% were uninsured. 67% had low income. 19% lived in an area where >20% of adults did not finish high school.NH-B and Hispanic patients had more unfavorable SEF including uninsured status, low income, and less formal education than NH-W and Asian pts (all p < 0.001). They were also younger, more likely to be female and to have metastatic disease (all p < 0.001). Despite this, NH-B race and Hispanic ethnicity were not associated with decreased OS. Male sex, older age, non-private insurance, low income, lower education, non-academic facility, location outside the Northeast, higher Charlson-Deyo score, worse grade, larger tumor size, and higher stage were all associated with decreased OS (all p < 0.001). On MV analysis, along with adverse pathologic factors, type of insurance (p = 0.003), low income (p < 0.001), and facility type and location of treatment (p < 0.001) remained associated with decreased OS; non-white race/ethnicity was not.ConclusionsDisparities in survival exist in CCA, however they are not driven by race/ethnicity. Non-privately insured and low-income patients had decreased OS, as did patients treated at non-academic centers and outside the Northeast. This suggests that decreased ability to access and afford care results in worse outcomes, rather than biological differences amongst racial/ethnic groups.     

Patterns of androgen deprivation therapies among men diagnosed with localised prostate cancer: A population-based study

AimMany men diagnosed with localised prostate cancer will eventually be treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). ADT is associated with adverse effects and its timing is controversial. Data on patterns of use are scarce. We describe patterns of ADT use, defined as castration (medical and surgical) or antiandrogen monotherapy initiated after primary treatment, in a population-based cohort.Methods and materialsData were extracted from the population-based Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe). Totally 45,147 men diagnosed between 1997 and 2009 with clinical stage T1–2, N0–NX, M0–MX and prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 50 ng/ml without primary ADT were included. Outcomes in the period 2006 through 2010 were analysed using a period analysis approach.ResultsThe cumulative incidence of castration at 10 years after diagnosis was 11.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 11.0–12.2%). The corresponding proportion of antiandrogen monotherapy was 10.8% (95% CI, 10.2–11.4%). Castration was the dominant therapy among men on deferred treatment. The probability of receiving castration rather than antiandrogen monotherapy increased with age. Estimated median durations of castration ranged from 4 years in the deferred treatment high-risk group to 17 years in the prostatectomy low-risk group. The main limitation was the lack of information on progression to metastatic disease and PSA at the time for initiation of ADT.ConclusionWhen initiated early after curative treatment, the duration of castration can be decades. The findings indicate that more accurate tools are necessary to guide which men should be selected for ADT as secondary treatment.     

A new approach to understanding racial disparities in prostate cancer treatment

Objective:Previous studies addressing racial disparities in treatment for early-stage prostate cancer have focused on the etiology of undertreatment of black men. Our objective was to determine whether racial disparities are attributable to undertreatment, overtreatment, or both.Methods:Using the SEER-Medicare dataset, we identified men 67–84 years-old diagnosed with localized prostate cancer from 1998 to 2007. We stratified men into clinical benefit groups using tumor aggressiveness and life expectancy. Low-benefit was defined as low-risk tumors and life expectancy < 10 years; high-benefit as moderate-risk tumors and life expectancy ≥ 10 years; all others were intermediate-benefit. Logistic regression modeled the association between race and treatment (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) across benefit groups.Results:Of 68,817 men (9.8% black and 90.2% white), 56.2% of black and 66.3% of white men received treatment (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.62–0.69). The percent of low-, intermediate-, and high-benefit men who received treatment was 56.7%, 68.4%, and 79.6%, respectively (P = < 0.001). In the low-benefit group, 51.9% of black vs. 57.2% of white patients received treatment (OR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67–0.81) compared to 57.2% vs. 69.6% in the intermediate-benefit group (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.59–0.70). Racial disparity was largest in the high-benefit group (64.2% of black vs. 81.4% of white patients received treatment; OR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48–0.68). The interaction between race and clinical benefit was significant (P < 0.001).Conclusion:Racial disparities were largest among men most likely to benefit from treatment. However, a substantial proportion of both black and white men with a low clinical benefit received treatment, indicating a high level of overtreatment.     

Race is a Risk Factor for the Deferral of Resection and Radiation for Early-Stage Lung Cancer

PURPOSEThere remain profound race-related disparities in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Deferral of operative management for early-stage disease is recognized as driver of this disparity. Black race has been associated with higher rates of surgical deferral. It remains unclear how race impacts likelihood of receiving radiation therapy after declining surgical management of NSCLC.PATIENTS AND METHODSA retrospective cohort analysis was completed using data from the National Cancer Database (NCBD) for patients 18 and over with stage I NSCLC offered surgical resection from 2004 to 2015 (N = 89,462). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of surgical deferral and predictors for deferral of radiation after deferral of surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank tests and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed.RESULTS87,293 (97.6%) patients underwent surgery, 2169 (2.4%) deferred. Patients who deferred had 2.1 times higher hazard ratio for mortality, (HR = 2.08, [1.97, 2.29], P < .001). Of those that deferred, 1250 (57.6%) received postdeferral radiation. Compared to White patients, Black patients had OR of 1.82 for deferring both surgery and radiation (aOR: 1.82, [1.31, 2.53], P < .001) and Asian and Pacific Island (API) patients had an OR of 2.67 (aOR: 2.67, [1.27, 4.64], P = .008). Other predictors of deferral of therapy included: Medicare or lack of insurance, and treatment at nonacademic medical centers.CONCLUSIONInsurance status and Black race, and API race are associated with deferring surgical therapy and radiation therapy for NSCLC. These findings are consistent with the large body of work showing worse outcomes for treatment of NSCLC in minority patients.     

Racial disparities in an aging population: The relationship between age and race in the management of African American men with high-risk prostate cancer

PurposeTo evaluate the relationship between age and race on the receipt of definitive therapy among men with high-risk prostate cancer (CaP).MethodsWe used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program to identify 62,644 men with high-risk CaP (PSA > 20 or Gleason 8–10 or stage ≥ cT3a) diagnosed from 2004 to 2010. Multivariable logistic regression analysis modeled the interaction between age and race and its association with receipt of definitive therapy on 57,674 patients (47,879 white men; 9,795 African American [AA] men) with complete data on the covariates of interest.ResultsAmong men age ≥ 70, AA men had a higher risk of CaP-specific mortality (PCSM) compared to white men after adjusting for sociodemographic and prostate cancer-specific factors (Adjusted HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.02–1.38; P = 0.02). Nevertheless, a significant interaction between race and age was found (P_interaction = 0.01), such that the adjusted odds of receiving definitive treatment for AA vs. white was 0.67 (95% CI 0.62–0.73; P < 0.001) among men age < 70, but was 0.60 (95% CI 0.55–0.66; P < 0.001) among men age ≥ 70, suggesting increased racial disparity in the receipt of definitive treatment among older men.ConclusionAA men with high-risk CaP are less likely to receive definitive therapy than white men. This disparity is significantly larger among men age ≥ 70, despite excess PCSM among AA men in this group. With a rapidly expanding population of older minority men, this disparity should be urgently addressed to prevent increasing disparities in cancer care.     

Trends in treatments for prostate cancer in the United States, 2010-2015

Although annual mortality trends for prostate cancer were stabilized in recent years, understanding the exact treatment changes is necessary for optimal management. Utilization of not-otherwise specified (NOS) treatments for prostate cancer was unclear. Thus, this study aimed to analyze trends in treatment for prostate cancer in the U.S. from 2010 to 2015 and examine whether the treatment for the prostate cancer in the U.S. is compliant with clinical practice guidelines. Using joinpoint regression models, we examined trends in the rate and proportion of age-standardized utilization (ASUR and ASUP) of treatments for prostate cancer diagnosed during 2010-2015 in the U.S. based on the data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, 2018 data-release, with linkage to active surveillance/watchful waiting [AS/WW]) cancer registry program. Among 316,690 men with prostate cancer diagnosed during 2010-2015, ASUR and ASUP for radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, AS/WW and NOS treatment were 32.7, 34.4, 10.0 and 40.1 per 100,000, and 27.9%, 29.3%, 8.5% and 34.2%, respectively. Trends in the overall ASUR for prostate cancer treatments differed by cancer risk group, patients’ age, race/ethnicity, Gleason score, insurance status, and the average education level, average poverty-level and foreign-born person percentage of the patient’s residence-county, but not by rural-urban continuum or region. ASUP of radical prostatectomy decreased from 9.8% in 2010 to 4.8% in 2015 (annual percent change [APC] = -12.0%, 95% CI, -15.9 to -7.9%), and the decrease was observed in all different risk groups. ASUP of AS/WW increased from 16.4% in 2010 to 30.2% in 2013 (APC = 22.7%, 95% CI, 4.6 to 44.0%) and then remained stable through 2013 to 2015 (APC = 1.9%, 95% CI, -24.1 to 36.9%). The increasing tendency of AS/WW only occurred in the low-risk and intermediate-risk groups. The ASUP of NOS treatment has increased from 32.3% in 2010 to 36.8% in 2015 (P<0.01). In conclusion, ASUR and ASUP for prostate cancer treatments, including NOS treatment, had changed during 2010-2015. Their trends appeared to differ by cancer risk-group, age, race/ethnicity, Gleason score and socioeconomic factors. Future studies are warranted to understand the impacts of upward trends in ASUP of NOS treatments and AS/WW on patient survival and prostate cancer mortality.     

Association between percentage of tumor involvement and Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer

To find the predictors of Gleason score upgrading in a cohort of low-risk prostate cancer patients, data were analyzed comprising 1,632 consecutive men with low-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1993 and 2009. Assessment focused on preoperative parameters including patient age, race, diagnostic prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason score, along with pathological parameters including percentage of tumor involvement (PTI), tumor laterality, pathological stage, extra-capsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and surgical margins. These parameters were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. Kaplan?CMeier curves compared differences in biochemical disease-free survival in men having cancers with and without Gleason score upgrading. Cases involving pathological Gleason score upgrading were identified in 723 (44.3?%) of 1,632 patients. Kaplan?CMeier PSA recurrence-free survival curves showed a difference in outcome between men with and without Gleason score upgrading (p?<?0.001). Of Gleason score upgraded patients, 35 (4.8?%) men had PTI of <5?%, 237 (32.8?%) had PTI of 5?C9.9?%, 177 (24.5?%) had PTI of 10?C14.9?%, and 274 (37.9?%) had PTI????15?% (p?<?0.001). PTI (p?<?0.001) along with diagnostic PSA, patient age, diagnostic biopsy Gleason score, pathologic stage, and surgical margin status were independent predictors of pathological Gleason score upgrading on multivariate logistic regression. PTI correlates closely with Gleason score upgrading in a low-risk prostate cancer cohort. Low-risk prostate cancer patients with clinical findings suggestive of high PTI or large volume cancers should not benefit from active surveillance strategies.     

Racial variation in receipt of quality radiation therapy for prostate cancer

Purpose

Racial disparities are apparent in the management and outcomes for prostate cancer; however, disparities in compliance to quality measures for radiation therapy for prostate cancer have not been previously studied. Therefore, the goal of the study was to characterize disparities in the compliance rates with quality measures.

Methods

The comparative effectiveness analysis of radiation therapy and surgery study is a population-based, prospective cohort study that enrolled 3708 men with clinically localized prostate cancer from 2011 to 2012. Compliance with 5 radiation-specific quality measures endorsed by national consortia as of 2011 was assessed, and compliance was compared by race using logistic regression.

Results

Overall, 604 men received definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of which 20% were self-reported black, 74% non-Hispanic white, and 6% Hispanic. Less than two-thirds of black and Hispanic men received EBRT that was compliant with all available quality measures (p?=?0.012). Compared to white men, black men were less likely to receive dose-escalated EBRT (95% vs. 87%, p?=?0.011) and less likely to avoid unnecessary pelvic radiation for low-risk disease (99% vs. 20%, p?<?0.001). Compared to white men, Hispanic men were less likely to undergo image guidance (87% vs. 71%, p?=?0.04). Black and Hispanic men were more likely to receive EBRT from low-quality providers than white men.

Conclusions

Addressing disparities in access to providers that meet quality guidelines, and improving adherence to evidence-based processes of care may decrease racial/ethnic disparities in prostate cancer outcomes.

     

Health insurance coverage and cost barriers to needed medical care among U.S. adult cancer survivors age<65 years

BACKGROUND: The health insurance and cost barriers to care among cancer survivors age <65 years were examined. METHODS: Using the 1998 and 2000 National Health Interview Survey, survivors ages 18 to 64 years (n=1718) were compared with similarly aged adults without cancer (n=50,276) to examine health insurance and reported delayed/missed needed medical care within the previous year because of cost. Findings were initially adjusted for age, sex, race, and ethnicity, and further adjusted for employment, income, health status, marital status, and region. RESULTS: Before adjustment, survivors were less likely to be uninsured (12.4% vs. 18.0%) and more likely to have public insurance (11.2% vs. 6.2%). After initial adjustment, survivors were as likely to lack insurance, less likely to have private insurance, and more likely to have public insurance. After further adjusting, differences in being uninsured were found to be small, differences in having private insurance were eliminated, and differences in having public insurance were reduced. Survivors most likely to lack insurance were younger, female, African-American, or lower income. Survivors, particularly uninsured or publicly insured survivors, were more likely to delay/miss care because of cost. Overall, 20.9% of survivors, including 68% of uninsured survivors, reported delaying/missing needed care. CONCLUSIONS: Health insurance coverage among cancer survivors age<65 years appears to be comparable to that of adults of similar age, sex, race, and ethnicity, but survivors may more likely be publicly insured. Differences are attributable in part to employment, income, and health status, factors potentially influenced by cancer. Unmet medical care needs because of cost were common among survivors, particularly uninsured survivors.     

The association between race and prostate cancer risk on initial biopsy in an equal access,multiethnic cohort

Purpose

Population-based studies have established a link between race and prostate cancer (PC) risk, but whether race predicts PC after adjusting for clinical characteristics is unclear. We investigated the association between race and risk of low- and high-grade PC in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy in an equal access medical center.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective record review of 887 men (48.6 % black, 51.4 % white) from the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center who underwent initial prostate biopsy between 2001 and 2009. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of race and biopsy outcome was conducted adjusting for age, body mass index, number of cores taken, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and digital rectal examination findings. Multinomial logistic regression was used to test the association between black race and PC grade (Gleason <7 vs. ≥7).

Results

Black men were younger at biopsy (61 vs. 65 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher pre-biopsy PSA (6.6 vs. 5.8 ng/ml, p = 0.001). A total of 499 men had PC on biopsy (245 low grade; 254 high grade). In multivariable analyses, black race was significantly predictive of PC overall [odds ratio 1.50, p = 0.006] and high-grade PC [relative risk ratio (RRR) 1.84, p = 0.001], but was not significantly associated with low-grade PC (RRR 1.29, p = 0.139).

Conclusion

In an equal access healthcare facility, black race was associated with greater risk of PC detection on initial biopsy and of high-grade PC after adjusting for clinical characteristics. Additional investigation of mechanisms linking black race and PC risk and PC aggressiveness is needed.