Serological diagnosis of hepatitis C virus in patients with liver disease in Saudi Arabia Evaluation of antibody determination by recombinant immunoblot assays in relation to RNA detection by polymerase chain reaction

Sera from 164 Saudi Arabian patients with non-A, non-B hepatitis liver disease were examined for antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) by second- and third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2 and RIBA-3) and for HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). By using RIBA-2, 92 (56.1%) were reactive, 64 (39%) were nonreactive, and 8 (4.9%) were indeterminate. By using RIBA-3, 98 (59.7%) were reactive 60 (36.6%) were nonreactive, and 6 (3.7%) were indeterminate. By using PCR, 108 (65.9%) were positive. Of the eight RIBA-2 indeterminate samples, seven became RIBA-3 reactive but PCR-positive, and one became RIBA-3 nonreactive but PCR-negative. Of the six RIBA-3 indeterminate samples, five were RIBA-2 nonreactive but PCR-positive, and one was RIBA-2 reactive but PCR-negative. From our study on Saudi patients, we conclude that RIBA-3 has slightly but not significantly improved the results of anti-HCV antibody detection, and is probably of more value to resolve those indeterminate samples by RIBA-2. Although expensive, PCR remains the most reliable HCV diagnostic method until an HCV antigen detection test is available.     

Recombinant immunoblot assay reaction patterns and hepatitis C virus RNA in blood donors and non-A, non-B hepatitis patients

To establish the value of the second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2) and cDNA polymerase chain reaction (cDNA PCR) for confirmation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, anti-HCV reaction patterns and the presence of HCV RNA were examined in 610 blood donors and 255 non-A, non-B hepatitis patients who were positive or indeterminate in RIBA-2. Of RIBA-2-positive donors (n = 191) and patients (n = 224), 75.4 and 89.7 percent, respectively, were HCV RNA positive. The most frequently observed anti-HCV recognition patterns in HCV RNA-positive donors and patients were c22, c33c, and c100 and/or 5- 1-1 (67.3%, 57.7%) and c22, c33c (24.8%, 29.3%). Among subjects with a RIBA-2-indeterminate result, HCV RNA was detected more often in patients (n = 31) than in donors (n = 419): 67.7 and 2.1 percent, respectively. In viremic persons with single-band reactivity in RIBA-2, this reactivity was always directed against either c22 or c33c. HCV RNA was detected by cDNA PCR in none of 162 persons with only anti-c100 and/or anti-5-1-1 reactivity. Therefore, RIBA-2 reactivity against c100 in combination with 5-1-1 should not be considered positive but indeterminate. In RIBA-2-indeterminate persons, HCV RNA detection is necessary for reliable confirmation of HCV infection.     

Reliability of the third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay for hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND: In a confirmatory laboratory, the second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2) was replaced by the third- generation RIBA (RIBA-3) in March 1993. The aim of this validation study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of RIBA-2 and RIBA- 3 in a routine setting, by using a validated hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA polymerase chain reaction to establish plasma viremia. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: RIBA-2 testing was performed (March 1991-March 1993) in 593 HCV RNA-positive and 1498 HCV RNA-negative subjects. RIBA-3 testing was performed (March 1993-May 1994) in 220 HCV RNA-positive and 530 HCV RNA-negative subjects. All samples reacted for anti-HCV in enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: In HCV RNA-positive individuals, the sensitivity of RIBA-3 was significantly higher than that of RIBA-2 (99.5% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.0005). This was not caused by inclusion of the NS5 antigen, but by a higher sensitivity of the antigens c33 and c100 (RIBA-2: 94.3% and 62.6%; RIBA-3: 99.5% and 88.6%). Replacement of the c22 and c100 recombinant proteins by synthetic peptides significantly reduced nonspecific reactivity against these antigens (p < 0.0001). Unfortunately, increased nonspecific reactivity against the modified c33 antigen and the new NS5 antigen canceled out this effect. Two-band reactivity occurred more often in nonviremic persons than in viremic persons (32.7% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.0001). Risk factors for HCV infection were less frequently observed in 11 blood donors with two-band reactivity than in 6 blood donors with other positive RIBA-3 patterns (18% vs. 83%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The higher sensitivity of RIBA-3 significantly reduced the number of indeterminate test results in HCV RNA-positive persons. Confirmatory laboratories must be aware of the frequent occurrence of nonspecific, isolated reactivity and even nonspecific, two-band reactivity in anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-reactive blood donors.     

Anti-HCV confirmatory testing of voluntary blood donors: comparison of the sensitivity of two immunoblot assays

BACKGROUND: In this study, the sensitivity of two commercially available anti-HCV immunoblot assays (HCV Western blot (Wellcozyme] and RIBA 3.0 SIA [RIBA-3, Chiron]) was compared in a voluntary blood donor population. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Four groups of donor samples were retrospectively tested in this study. Groups 1 and 2 were donor samples that gave positive or indeterminate band patterns, respectively, when originally tested on the HCV Western blot between 1994 and 1998. These samples were tested on the RIBA 3.0. Donor samples in Groups 3 and 4 were originally tested on RIBA-3 during 1998 and 1999 and gave positive or indeterminate blot results, respectively. In this study these two groups were tested on the HCV Western blot. Samples with discrepant results on the two immunoblot assays were selected for genotyping or serotyping. RESULTS: The two immunoblots showed similar sensitivity to the core and NS5 proteins. However, of 35 samples positive on Western blot or RIBA-3, the Western blot failed to detect NS4 in 14 samples compared with only 5 for RIBA-3. As well, the Western blot failed to detect NS3 in 6 samples compared to 2 for RIBA-3. Five (27.8%) of 18 samples that were Western blot indeterminate due to core reactivity showed an additional NS3 band on RIBA-3. Of the samples with additional NS3 and/or NS4 reactivity on RIBA-3 that were genotyped or serotyped, all were HCV type 3. CONCLUSIONS: Western blot and RIBA-3 showed similar sensitivity to the HCV core and NS5 proteins. However, RIBA-3 showed greater sensitivity to both NS3 and NS4 compared to the Western blot. The reduced sensitivity of the Western blot to the NS3 and NS4 proteins was observed with HCV type 3 samples.     

Confirmation of hepatitis C infection: a comparison of five immunoblot assays

BACKGROUND: Recently, new immunoblot assays for the detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) became available. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The performance of five confirmatory anti-HCV immunoblot assays was studied with samples with known HCV antibody and HCV RNA status. The assays were a third-generation strip recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-3, Chiron Corp., Emeryville, CA), a second-generation HCV blot (DB-2 blot, Diagnostic Biotechnology, Singapore), the Wellcozyme HCV Western blot (Murex blot, Murex Diagnostics, Dartford, UK), an immunodot HCV assay (Matrix, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL), and the third-generation HCV line immunoassay (Liatek-III, Organon Teknika, Boxtel, The Netherlands). RESULTS: Sensitivity on samples from 48 HCV RNA-positive, second-generation RIBA (RIBA-2)-positive persons and specificity on samples from 31 low-risk donors was 96 percent or better for all assays. The sensitivity on 31 HCV RNA-positive, RIBA-2- indeterminate samples was as follows: Liatek-III, 94 percent; RIBA-3, 90 percent; Murex blot, 61 percent; Matrix, 55 percent; and DB-2 blot, 39 percent. In testing 39 HCV RNA-negative, RIBA-2-indeterminate donor samples, the percentage found to be negative was Liatek-III, 77 percent; RIBA-3, 67 percent; Murex blot, 49 percent; DB-2 blot, 33 percent; and Matrix, 15 percent. The order of sensitivity on four HCV seroconversion series was (from high to low): RIBA-3, Liatek-III, DB-2 blot, Murex blot, and Matrix; the differences were small. CONCLUSION: Detection of HCV antibodies was not refined by the addition of new HCV antigens (NS5, E2/NS1), but by improved classical antigens (core, NS3, NS4). Replacement of the commonly used RIBA-2 will resolve the status of a high proportion of RIBA-2-indeterminate samples.     

HCV antibodies in Hungarian blood donations. Experiences collected by ELISA tests, immunoblot assays and polymerase chain reaction and protocols for donor management

SUMMARY. Routine screening of Hungarian blood donors for anti-HCV commenced in the second half of 1992. Before this, five available anti-HCV ELISA kits were compared in pilot studies. In the first series, 831 random donor samples were tested by one of the tests and the 12 (1.4%) reactives found were retested by the other four. Six of the reactives were positive in all ELISA. In the second series, 325 samples from donors with elevated transaminase levels were tested by all five kits. Forty-four were found to be reactive by one or more of the tests and 32 (10%) were positive in all five assays. Samples concordantly reactive in the ELISA were positive in second or third generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA 2 or RIBA 3); those that gave discordant results were indeterminate or negative. Eleven concordantly reactive samples from the second series were HCV RNA positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In the first period of screening with Abbott ELISA 2 a repeat-reactivity rate of 0.98% was observed in 171,106 samples tested. Reactives were retested for supplementary testing by Wellcozyme anti-HCV. Donors reactive in both tests and strongly reactive (ELISA ratio ( ER ) = optical density/cut off 2.5) in either of them were permanently deferred. Those negative in the supplementary ELISA or weakly reactive (1.0<2.5) in both tests were subjected to RIBA 2. On the basis of RIBA, positive donors were permanently deferred, indeterminates were excluded for 1 year and negatives were readmitted. In 1992, 1,347 supplementary tests were completed; 824 (61%) of the respective donors were permanently deferred, 218 (16%) were deferred for 1 year and 305 (23%) were readmitted.     

二种丙型肝炎病毒抗体确证试剂盒检测性能的比较

目的 应用丙型肝炎病毒抗体确证试验检测肝病患者血清抗HCV,进一步确认HCV感染.方法 对北京万泰生物药业股份有限公司初步研制重组免疫印迹法检测抗HCV试剂(简称CWT)与CHIRON RIBA HCV 3.0 Strip Immunoblot Assay进行比较,采用477份血清标本进行检测分析(慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染者血清350份、非甲非戊型肝炎患者血清7份、对照组采用乙型肝炎患者血清30份、戊肝肝炎患者血清30份及正常献血人员血清60份).结果 120份对照组非丙型肝炎患者血清均为抗HCV阴性;350份慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染者血清,国产试剂检出阳性341份,9份不确定;CHIRON RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA试剂检出阳性343份,不确定7份.7份非甲非戊型肝炎患者血清两种试剂检测均为阳性2份,阴性4份,不确定结果1份.两种试剂比较,检测结果一致率为99.16%(473/477),两者有很强的一致性(Kappa=0.98).结论 两种试剂对丙型肝炎病毒抗体的检测方法具有高度的一致性.特别是对于非甲-非戊型肝炎患者中的HCV感染者更有一定的诊断意义.

Abstract：

Objective To detect anti-HCV in serum of hepatic disease patients by performing the confirmatory test, and further to confirm HCV infection. Methods Two recombinant immunoblot assays (CWT and CHIRON RIBA HCV 3.0 Strip Immunoblot Assay) were used respectively to detect anti-HCV in 477 human serum samples, which comprised 350 HCV-infected patients' specimens, 7 none-A none-E hepatitis specimens, 30 HBV-infected patients' specimens, 30 hepatitis E virus infected patients'specimens, and 60 specimens drawn from blood donors. The latter three groups served as controls. Results A total of 120 control non-HCV-infected patients' specimens were negative when tested by both assays. Among 350 HCV-infected patients, 341 were positive and 9 were indeterminated by CWT assay; 343 were positive and 7 were indeterminated by CHIRON RIBA HCV 3. 0 SIA. Seven none-A none-E hepatitis specimens tested by both assays turned out to be 2 positive, 4 negative and 1 indeterminate. The consistency rate of these two assays was 99. 16% (Kappa=0.98). Conclusion CWT assay is highly coherent with CHIRON RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA assay in the methodology of anti-HCV antibody detection, which can be applied in the determination of HCV infection among none-A none-E hepatitis patients.     

Application of a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of total hepatitis C virus core antigen in blood donors

Recent studies have shown that total hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen, both free and antibody bound, is an accurate indirect marker of viral replication that can be used in clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of a new total HCV core antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection and quantification of total core antigen in blood donors, testing positive for anti-HCV antibodies and for prospective low-risk population screening. A population comprising 257 samples, from blood donors detected reactive for anti-HCV antibodies [137 recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) positive and 120 RIBA indeterminate], were tested by using a new total HCV core antigen ELISA. HCV-RNA was quantified by using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays in all RIBA-positive samples and RIBA-indeterminate samples that were positive for the total core antigen. Specificity of the assay was studied in 1070 healthy blood donors negative for anti-HCV antibodies. Compared with quantitative PCR assays, the total HCV core antigen assay showed 97.37% sensitivity. The three HCV-RNA-positive samples, which tested negative for the total core antigen, had a low viral load (< 1.4 x 10(4) IU mL(-1)). All samples with more than 1.4 x 10(4) IU mL(-1) of viral RNA were positive for total core antigen, independent of the HCV genotype. Concentration of total core antigen correlated significantly with those of HCV-RNA (r = 0.614, P < 0.0001). Overall specificity in freshly collected blood donor specimens was 99.63%. Our data indicate that the total HCV core antigen ELISA has a sensitivity close to PCR assays in diagnosing HCV infection in blood donors with anti-HCV antibodies and shows an excellent specificity in volunteer donors. This assay, in combination with anti-HCV antibodies screening tests, could be an alternative to molecular assays for HCV infection screening in blood donors.     

Hepatitis C virus among blood donors: follow-up study

BACKGROUND: The exact significance of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) in blood donors remains unknown. Confirmatory tests of anti-HCV- reactive serum and HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are used to refute a large proportion of false-positive results. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Ninety-two blood donors who were anti-HCV reactive in a first-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were reevaluated 10 months later with a second-generation ELISA (ELISA-2) as well as with second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2) and by PCR. RESULTS: Twenty-five (43.9%) of the 57 ELISA-2-positive donors were confirmed as positive by RIBA-2; of these, 84 percent were HCV RNA positive in PCR. Of the 57 who were still anti-HCV positive, 46 were followed up and tested again in the same manner 2 years after the first screening. At that time, the pattern was little changed: 94 percent of RIBA-2- and PCR-positive donors remained positive. Of RIBA-2- and PCR-positive blood donors, 62 percent had abnormal alanine aminotransferase levels in at least one of the three evaluations. Among the anti-HCV-positive donors confirmed by RIBA-2, 60 percent, versus 12.6 percent in the control group, had a significantly (p < 0.001) more frequent risk factor for HCV infection, due to parenteral exposure to blood. CONCLUSION: These data confirm a good correlation between RIBA-2 reactivity and the detection of HCV RNA in a population of anti-HCV- positive blood donors.     

Third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay: comparison of reactivities according to hepatitis C virus genotype

BACKGROUND: Recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) is widely used as a supplemental test in hepatitis C virus (HCV) confirmatory algorithms. As this assay is based on HCV type 1, its performance was examined with the common European HCV genotypes (1, 2, and 3). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A study was performed to retest in third-generation RIBA (RIBA- 3) all 146 second-generation RIBA (RIBA-2)-positive polymerase chain reaction-positive samples detected by second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and having known HCV genotypes (74 HCV type 1, 21 type 2, 51 type 3). RIBA band intensities were examined according to HCV genotype. An additional 90 RIBA-3-confirmed PCR-positive samples (47 HCV type 1, 5 type 2, 38 type 3) detected by third-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were also examined. RESULTS: In the first group of 146 samples, the RIBA-3 NS4 (c100p) band showed a marked improvement in sensitivity for the detection of HCV types 2 and 3 over that of the c100 antigen of RIBA-2, but the mean band intensities of HCV types 2 and 3 remained significantly lower than those of type 1. Improved sensitivity of the NS3 band of RIBA-3 to HCV type 3 was also apparent, but, again, the mean band intensity measured was lower for type 3 than for either type 1 or type 2. The c22 band of RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 exhibited equal sensitivity for all HCV genotypes. These differences were also apparent when RIBA-3 was used in conjunction with third-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. CONCLUSION: The current RIBA-3 lacks sensitivity to the NS4 antibody for HCV types 2 and 3. The incorporation of type-specific components to other genotypes for NS4 (and NS3) antigens should be considered by the manufacturers.     

Transmission of HCV infection by RIBA indeterminate and positive blood units

A retrospective study was carried out on the recipients of 73 units of blood from 53 donors found reactive for anti-HCV. The donors were screened with anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA C-100) and reactivity was confirmed with the first generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA I). Fifty-two patients were recipients of blood from donors reacting as RIBA I 'indeterminate' and 21 of blood from RIBA I 'positive' donors. Only three recipients (5.8%) from 'indeterminate' donors were anti-HCV positive indicating that such donors are very seldom infectious. Eleven (52.4%) recipients from 'positive' donors had antibodies to HCV, indicating that not all RIBA-positive donors are necessarily infectious. Pretransfusion samples of the seropositive recipients were unavailable. All samples were analyzed with the first generation ELISA and with either the second-generation ELISA or RIBA (RIBA II) in order to evaluate test sensitivity. RIBA II was more sensitive than RIB I. One RIBA I indeterminate donor was positive by RIBA II. His recipient had antibodies to HCV. Twelve RIBA I indeterminate and three RIBA I positive donors were negative by RIBA II. All their recipients were anti-HCV negative. The second-generation ELISA was also shown to be more sensitive than ELISA C-100. The second-generation ELISA detected six confirmed anti-HCV positive recipients who were negative by ELISA C-100.     

Long-term follow-up of and infectivity in blood donors with hepatitis C antibodies and persistently normal alanine aminotransferase levels

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prevalence of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in blood donors with HCV antibodies and persistently normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-nine anti-HCV-positive donors with normal ALT on four determinations at 3-month intervals were further tested monthly for 6 months, and they had normal ALT values. The presence of HCV RNA was determined in these 39 donors. RESULTS: Serum HCV RNA was detected in 16 of 39 donors, 14 of 14 who reacted on second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2) and 2 of 15 who were indeterminate. None of the 10 RIBA-2-nonreactive donors had evidence of viremia. The 15 RIBA-2- indeterminate samples were tested with third-generation RIBA (RIBA-3); the results showed reactivity in 5 (including the 2 HCV RNA positive), an indeterminate pattern in 7, and nonreactivity in 3 (all RNA negative). Among HCV RNA-positive subjects, mean age (p < 0.05), mean ALT (p < 0.001), signal-to-cutoff (S:CO) ratio on second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (p < 0.001), and gamma globulin levels (p < 0.05) were higher than those among HCV RNA-negative subjects. During 6 additional months of ALT monitoring, completed by 36 of 39 donors, increased values were detected in 6 (5 HCV RNA positive). In 4 of those 6, however, ALT levels were less than 1.5-fold the upper normal limit. HCV RNA results were unchanged at the end of 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Forty-one percent of anti-HCV-positive donors with persistently normal ALT had active HCV infection. Long-term ALT monitoring allowed the detection of significantly increased enzyme values in only 2 of 16 viremic donors. Reactivity on RIBA-2 or -3, greater age, mean ALT levels in the upper range of normal, higher S:CO ratio on second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and higher gamma globulin levels were predictive of viremia.     

HCV RNA in blood donors with isolated reactivities by third-generation RIBA

BACKGROUND: The objective of this collaborative study was to learn the proportion of HCV RNA-positive samples obtained from a population of donors with isolated anti-HCV reactivities by third-generation RIBA (RIBA-3) (indeterminate results). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: During a 2-year period, 11 blood transfusion centers kept all samples with indeterminate RIBA-3 results to test them by PCR, using both local and commercial techniques. RESULTS: Of the 758 RIBA-3 indeterminate samples, 10 (1.3%) were positive for HCV RNA: 3. 3 percent (6/180) and 1.3 percent (4/317) of samples with anti-core or anti-NS3 reactivity, respectively, and none of the 52 and 209 samples with anti-NS4 or anti-NS5 reactivity, respectively. HCV RNA-positive donors with anti-core reactivity were infected with different subtypes (1 with HCV subtype 1b, 1 with 2, 1 with 2a/2c, 2 with 3a, and 1 with 5a), and a follow-up indicated a chronic-carrier state in two of the six donors. Acute hepatitis was diagnosed in three of the four donors with anti-NS3 reactivity alone. Two of these three were IV drug users and were infected with subtype 1a. CONCLUSION: HCV RNA-positive donors with indeterminate results in RIBA-3 are extremely rare, but they do exist. They were observed only when either anti-core or anti-NS3 was present. With such a RIBA-3 profile, PCR testing remains necessary to reveal an eventual acute or chronic HCV infection.     

The significance of third-generation HCV RIBA-indeterminate, RNA-negative results in voluntary blood donors screened with sequential third-generation immunoassays

BACKGROUND: One of the problems associated with the use of anti-HCV immunoblot assays is the interpretation of indeterminate results without detectable HCV RNA. The purpose of this study was to examine the significance of third-generation RIBA (RIBA-3)-indeterminate, RNA-negative results in voluntary blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Since June 2000 all Australian Red Cross Blood Service testing sites have used an anti-HCV sequential immunoassay testing strategy whereby donors who are reactive on the primary screening immunoassay are tested on a secondary immunoassay and if reactive on both assays, further tested by immunoblot. From the four testing sites that use RIBA-3, the result profiles of donors who were RIBA-3-indeterminate, HCV RNA-negative were analyzed. RESULTS: From 2,661,786 donations screened for anti-HCV during the study period, 102 RIBA-3-indeterminate, RNA-negative donors were identified, most of whom were reactive to either c33p (69.6%) or c22p (27.5%). The RIBA-3-indeterminate, RNA-negative donors showed a significantly higher screening immunoassay signal strength to assay cutoff (S/CO) distribution than those with biologic false-reactive (BFR) results (1.853 vs. 1.524, p < 0.05) but a significantly lower distribution than RIBA-3-positive, RNA-negative (1.853 vs. 4.546, p < 0.05) or RNA-positive (1.853 vs. 6.467, p < 0.05) donors. The RIBA-3-indeterminate, RNA-negative donors showed a similar distribution of c33c and c22p band intensities compared with RIBA-3-positive, RNA-negative donors but significantly lower distribution of band strengths compared to the RIBA-3-positive, RNA-positive group. Compared to the indeterminate donors with previous anti-HCV-negative or BFR results, the indeterminate donors not previously screened for anti-HCV showed higher immunoassay S/CO ratio distributions, a higher proportion with c22p reactivity (16.2% vs. 36.7%), and higher frequency of risk factors (46.4% vs. 75.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that a combination of indicators can be used to help clarify RIBA-3-indeterminate, RNA-negative results. Specifically, donors with high S/CO ratios on a screening immunoassay, RIBA-3 reactivity to c22p or c33c with band intensity of 2+ or greater, without a previous history of negative or BFR donations and with an identifiable risk factor, have a high probability of representing true anti-HCV rather than nonspecific reactivity.     

Evaluation of indeterminate c22-3 reactivity in volunteer blood donors

Background: Approximately 25 percent of blood donor sera that are repeatably reactive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) on second-generation enzyme immunoassay (EIA 2.0) are indeterminate on second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA 2.0), and over 76 percent of these results are due to single reactivity to the HCV recombinant antigen c22- 3. Study Design and Methods: Data are presented on 46 volunteer allogeneic blood donors who were reactive on EIA2.0 and c22-3 indeterminate in RIBA 2.0. Index and follow-up samples were evaluated by using a panel of five synthetic peptide EIAs, a prototype strip immunoblot assay that uses synthetic peptides in addition to recombinant protein (RIBA 3.0), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for HCV RNA. Results: All 46 donations had normal alanine aminotransferase values; only 2 (4.3%) reacted for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. With a panel of 12 synthetic peptides spanning the entire sequence of the c22-3 recombinant antigen, 33 plasmas (72%) reacted to one peptide or none, including 19 plasmas with reactivity restricted entirely to the N-terminal peptide (1–15 amino acids) of c22-3. With RIBA 3.0, 28 donations (61%) were nonreactive, including 25 that reacted with one peptide or none in EIA. Of these 25 plasmas, 18 reacted with the N- terminal sequence only. All 46 index donations were tested by PCR; the single PCR-positive unit reacted with four HCV peptides, was positive by RIBA 3.0, and reacted for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. Twenty-six index donors were successfully recalled 3 to 7 months after their index donation. None seroconverted to positivity in RIBA 2.0, 1 was nonreactive, and 25 remained positive for c22-3 only. The restricted epitope reactivity in peptide EIA and RIBA 3.0 was maintained over time in all cases. All 26 of the follow-up samples tested negative by PCR. Conclusion: On the basis of the restricted peptide reactivity and PCR negativity of index and follow-up samples, it is concluded that the majority of c22-3 RIBA 2.0-indeterminate results are due to nonspecific cross-reactivity to restricted (principally, N-terminal) regions of HCV core antigen.     

Anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening at a Canadian Red Cross center: significance of a positive c100 HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

The c100 hepatitis C virus (HCV) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been used to screen blood donors to prevent transfusion-associated non-A,non-B hepatitis. This test is not specific, and only about 25 percent of c100 HCV ELISA-positive blood samples appear to transmit hepatitis C. However, the intensity of the ELISA (sample/cutoff ratio [S/C], greater than 2) could identify a subpopulation of donors that are at high risk for transmitting hepatitis. Blood samples from 20,186 volunteer blood donors at a Canadian Red Cross blood transfusion center were screened for antibodies to HCV using the c100 HCV ELISA. Fifty-nine (0.3%) of these donors were repeatably reactive on ELISA. When their samples were tested with the c100 recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) and second-generation RIBA (RIBA-2), 26 (44%) and 31 (52%) samples, respectively, were found to be positive. Thirty-three of the 59 ELISA-reactive donors had an S/C greater than 2. Of these 33 donors, 30 (91%) had elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT), 27 (82%) were RIBA-2 positive, and 22 (67%) had risk factors for hepatitis. In contrast, of the 26 ELISA-reactive donors with S/C less than 2, only 7 (27%) had elevated ALT, and 4 (15%) were RIBA-2 positive and also had high risk factors for hepatitis. Thus, while the HCV ELISA may lack specificity, its intensity can serve to identify a subgroup of donors that are at high risk for transmitting hepatitis.     

Comparative evaluation of supplemental hepatitis C virus antibody test systems

Implementation of routine blood donor screening using anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) has resulted in an urgent need for well-characterized supplemental assays to confirm the presence of HCV antibodies. A comparative study of four commercially available supplemental assays is reported here: first- and second-generation versions of a strip recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-1 and RIBA-2), an HCV neutralization EIA, and HCV neutralization plus synthetic peptide EIA. Three hundred sixty-seven blood donor specimens that were repeatedly reactive on HCV EIA were studied. Most specimens (93%) were also evaluated by radioimmunoassay (RIA) with a six-antigen panel, and 60 selected specimens were tested for HCV RNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RIBA-1 and RIBA-2 gave concordant results with 86 percent of specimens, while an additional 13 percent were correctly classified by RIBA-2 but not RIBA-1. Neutralization EIA alone correctly identified 94 percent of the study group, while the remaining 6 percent required the peptide EIA or the combined neutralization-peptide assay system for correct classification. The RIBA-2 and neutralization-peptide assay system for correct classification. The RIBA-2 and neutralization-peptide assay systems yielded identical results for 86 percent of specimens, and these results were supported by RIA and selected PCR testing. Only 2 specimens (0.5%) were frankly discrepant, while 51 specimens were indeterminate on either (47) or both (4) assays. When either the RIBA-2 or neutralization-peptide assay yielded an indeterminate interpretation, the other system correctly classified the specimen (based on concordance with RIA and PCR data) in a high proportion (92%) of cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)