Implementation of a preoperative multidisciplinary team approach for frail colorectal cancer patients: Influence on patient selection,prehabilitation and outcome

ObjectiveTo determine the influence of a preoperative multidisciplinary evaluation for frail older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) on preoperative decision making and postoperative outcomes.BackgroundSurgery is the main treatment for CRC. Older patients are at increased risk for adverse outcomes. For complex surgical cases, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach has been suggested to improve postoperative outcome. Evidence is lacking.MethodsHistorical cohort study from 2015 to 2018 in surgical patients ≥70 years with CRC. Frailty screening was used to appraise the somatic, functional and psychosocial health status. An MDT weighed the risk of surgery versus the expected gain in survival to guide preoperative decision making and initiate a prehabilitation program. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of a Clavien-Dindo (CD) Grade III-V complication. Secondary endpoints included the occurrence of any complication (CD II-V), length of hospital stay, discharge destination, readmission rate and overall survival.Results466 patients were included and 146 (31.3%) patients were referred for MDT evaluation. MDT patients were more often too frail for surgery compared to non-MDT patients (10.3% vs 2.2%, P = .01). Frailty was associated with overall mortality (aOR 2.6 95% CI 1.1–6.1). Prehabilitation was more often performed in MDT patients (74.8% vs 23.4% in non-MDT patients). Despite an increased risk, MDT patients did not suffer more postoperative complications (CD III-V) than non-MDT patients (14.9% vs 12.4%; P = .48). Overall survival was worse in MDT patients (35 (32–37) vs 48 (47–50) months in non-MDT patients; P < .01).ConclusionsImplementation of preoperative MDT evaluation for frail patients with CRC improves risk stratification and prehabilitation, resulting in comparable postoperative outcomes compared to non-frail patients. However, frail patients are at increased risk for worse overall survival.     

Age differences in patterns and confidence of using internet and social media for cancer-care among cancer survivors

ObjectivesThe internet and social media provide information and support to cancer survivors, and adolescent and young adults (AYA, age < 40 years), adults, and older (age 65+ years) cancer survivors may have different needs. We evaluated the impact of age on cancer-related internet and social media use and confidence in evaluating online information for cancer-care decision making.Materials and MethodsCancer survivors completed a convenience cross-sectional survey evaluating their cancer-related internet and social media use and their confidence in using these resources for decision making. Multivariable regression models evaluated the impact of age on usage patterns and confidence.ResultsAmong 371 cancer survivors, 58 were older adults and 138 were AYA; 74% used the internet and 39% social media for cancer care; 48% felt confident in using online information for cancer-care decisions. Compared to adult survivors, there was a non-significant trend for older survivors to be less likely to use the internet for cancer-care information(aOR = 0.49, 95% CI[0.23–1.03], P = .06), while AYA were more likely to use social media for cancer-care (aOR = 1.79[1.08–2.99], P = .03). Although confidence at using online information for cancer-care decision making did not differ between age groups, increasing age had a non-significant trend towards reduced confidence (aOR = 0.99 per year [0.97–1.00], P = .09). Most commonly researched and desired online information were causes/risk factors/symptoms, treatment options, and prognosis/outcomes.ConclusionsAge may influence the use of internet and social media for cancer-care, and older cancer survivors may be less confident at evaluating online information for cancer-care decision making. Future research should explore other strategies at meeting the informational needs of older cancer survivors.     

Use of implicit persuasion in decision making about adjuvant cancer treatment: A potential barrier to shared decision making

BackgroundShared decision making (SDM) is widely advocated, especially for preference-sensitive decisions like those on adjuvant treatment for early-stage cancer. Here, decision making involves a subjective trade-off between benefits and side-effects, and therefore, patients' informed preferences should be taken into account. If clinicians consciously or unconsciously steer patients towards the option they think is in their patients' best interest (i.e. implicit persuasion), they may be unwittingly subverting their own efforts to implement SDM. We assessed the frequency of use of implicit persuasion during consultations and whether the use of implicit persuasion was associated with expected treatment benefit and/or decision making.MethodsObservational study design in which consecutive consultations about adjuvant systemic therapy with stage I–II breast cancer patients treated at oncology outpatient clinics of general teaching hospitals and university medical centres were audiotaped, transcribed and coded by two researchers independently.ResultsIn total, 105 patients (median age = 59; range: 35–87 years) were included. A median of five (range: 2–10) implicitly persuasive behaviours were employed per consultation. The number of behaviours used did not differ by disease stage (P = 0.07), but did differ by treatment option presented (P = 0.002) and nodal status (P = 0.01). About 50% of patients with stage I or node-negative disease were steered towards undergoing chemotherapy, whereas 96% of patients were steered towards undergoing endocrine therapy, irrespective of expected treatment benefit. Decisions were less often postponed if more implicit persuasion was used (P = 0.03).InterpretationOncologists frequently use implicit persuasion, steering patients towards the treatment option that they think is in their patients' best interest. Expected treatment benefit does not always seem to be the driving force behind implicit persuasion. Awareness of one's use of these steering behaviours during decision making is a first step to help overcome the performance gap between advocating and implementing SDM.     

Deterioration in health-related quality of life is associated with lower lung resection rates in older adults

BackgroundLung cancer disproportionately affects older adults. Surgical treatment may result in decreased functional status and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Population-based data about patient-reported health outcomes for patients with early-stage lung cancer who do not undergo surgery is lacking.MethodsWe identified lung cancer patients with localized disease from the SEER-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (MHOS) linked database. Patients with baseline HRQOL survey prior to cancer diagnosis and follow-up survey ≥1 year after diagnosis were selected. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was used to compare patients who underwent surgery versus those who did not by demographics and HRQOL measures.ResultsOverall, 108 patients were evaluated, of whom 75 (69%) underwent surgery. Surgical patients were younger (mean 73 versus 80 years, p < 0.001); otherwise, patient groups were similar. Surgery was not performed based on surgeon recommendation (n = 21, 64%), contraindication(s), or patients' decision. Both groups experienced similar declines in physical HRQOL, mental HRQOL, and activities of daily living (ADL) scores; and increased major comorbidities. However, non-surgical patients had significant declines in mobility and personal care activities compared to surgical counterparts. On GEE, non-surgical patients were significantly more likely to experience an increase in number of comorbidities (OR 3.3, p = 0.02) compared to surgical patients.ConclusionsPatients undergoing lung cancer surgery experience significant declines in functional status and HRQOL. However, similar declines are seen in non-surgical patients. More information is needed about long term QOL trajectories with and without surgery so that patients and surgeons can make informed decisions balancing survival benefit and QOL interests.     

Impact of geriatric assessment on the management of older adults with head and neck cancer: A pilot study

ObjectiveAssess the utility of the G8 screening tool and CGA for older adults with head and neck cancer.MethodsPatients 65 years or older with a primary malignancy of the head and neck region were presented at the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting. The Geriatric 8 (G8) questionnaire was administered prior. Clinicians, blinded to the G8 result, made a recommendation on appropriate treatment, including potential referral for CGA. Patients considered vulnerable (G8 score ≤ 14) were also to be referred for CGA. Treatment outcomes were recorded.ResultsOver 6 months, 35 patients were recruited, median age 74 (range 65–93). Seventeen (49%) patients were assessed as vulnerable by the G8 score, including 7 (20%) whom the MDT referred for CGA. Seven with G8 scores ≤ 14 did not receive a CGA. Thirty (85.7%) underwent curative intent treatment, including 6 of 7 who had CGA. Of 10 vulnerable patients who did not have CGA, 70% received curative-intent treatment. Mean length of post-operative stay was 12.2 vs. 6.5 days in patients deemed vulnerable or fit by G8 scores, respectively (p = 0.46); completion rate of radical radiotherapy was 75% vs. 100% in each group, respectively (p = 0.13). Mean post-operative length of stay in vulnerable patients who underwent a CGA was 6.2 days vs. 17.3 days in those who were not referred (p = 0.79).ConclusionsThe G8 tool identified twice the number of patients as vulnerable compared to the MDT. There was a trend towards longer postoperative stay and lower radiotherapy completion rates in patients deemed vulnerable by G8 scores.     

Treatment strategies and outcomes of primary Myxofibrosarcomas in a large patients cohort

Backgroundthis study analysed primary myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) to investigate patient outcomes focusing on histopathologic margins and perioperative treatments.Patients and methodsdata from consecutive patients affected by primary and localized MFS of the extremities or trunk wall who underwent surgery (2002–2017) were analysed. Local recurrence (LR), amputation rate, incidence of distant metastasis (DM), and overall survival (OS) were studied.ResultsOf 293 included patients, 52 (17%) patients received perioperative treatments and 54 (18%) had positive microscopic histopathologic margins (R1). Median follow-up was 80 months (IQR, 49–109). 5-yr CCI of LR was 0.12 (SE: 0.02). Status of histopathologic margins (P < 0.001), tumour malignancy grade (P = 0.018) and size (P = 0023) were independent prognostic factor for LR. Nine amputations (amputation rate: 3%) were performed (N = 1 for primary tumour; N = 8 for LR). Larger tumour size (P = 0.015) and higher grade (P = 0.025) were independent prognostic factor for DM. 5-year OS was 0.84 (95%CI 0.79–0.88). Patient age (P = 0.008), tumour size (P = 0.013) and malignancy grade (P = 0.018) were independently associated to OS. In the subgroup of patients who had a re-excision for a primary MFS (N = 116, 40%), the presence of residual disease was not associated with LR, DM, or OS.Conclusionin this study 5-year LR, DM and OS were 12%, 17%, and 84%, respectively. One in six patients had a positive surgical margin, which was a prognostic factor for LR, while DM and OS were predicted by tumour grade and size. Findings from this large patient cohort may set benchmarks for investigating new treatment options for MFS.     

Evaluating the role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in multi-disciplinary team recommendations for oesophago-gastric cancer

Background:

National guidelines recommend that fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is performed in all patients being considered for radical treatment of oesophageal or oesophago-gastric cancer without computerised tomography scan (CTS) evidence of metastasis. Guidance also mandates that all patients with cancer have treatment decisions made within the context of a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting. Little is known, however, about the influence of PET-CT on decision making within MDTs. The aim of this study was to assess the role of PET-CT in oesophago-gastric cancer on MDT decision making.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively held database of all patients with biopsy-proven oesophageal or oesophago-gastric cancer discussed by a specialist MDT was interrogated. Patients selected for radical treatment without CTS evidence of M1 disease were identified. The influence of PET-CT on MDT decision making was examined by establishing whether the PET-CT confirmed CTS findings of M0 disease (and did not change the patient staging pathway) or whether the PET-CT changed the pathway by showing unsuspected M1 disease, refuting CTS suspicious metastases, or identifying another lesion (needing further investigation).

Results:

In 102 MDT meetings, 418 patients were discussed, of whom 240 were initially considered for radical treatment and 238 undergoing PET-CT. The PET-CT confirmed CTS findings for 147 (61.8%) and changed MDT recommendations in 91 patients (38.2%) by (i) identifying M1 disease (n=43), (ii) refuting CTS suspicions of M1 disease (n=25), and (iii) identifying new lesions required for investigations (n=23).

Conclusion:

The addition of PET-CT to standard staging for oesophageal cancer led to changes in MDT recommendations in 93 (38.2%) patients, improving patient selection for radical treatment. The validity of the proposed methods for evaluating PET-CT on MDT decision making requires more work in other centres and teams.     

Recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas: Clinical outcomes of surgical treatment and prognostic factors

Background and purposeLocoregional recurrence after resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a challenging therapeutic issue. The objective of this study was to identify clinicopathological factors predictive of overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) after reoperation for recurrent RPS.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively collected data from the medical records of 800 patients who underwent resection for sarcoma at our Institution, from 1983 to 2015. Among these patients, 120 were treated for retroperitoneal sarcoma and 55 had a locoregional recurrence (LR). Four of them did not undergo surgery and thus were excluded from this study leaving 51 cases available for data analysis. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.ResultsMedian overall survival was 33 months. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 75.5%, 47.1% and 31.6% respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that extension of surgery (P = 0.026), surgical margin status (P = 0.015) and histological grade of recurrent tumor (P = 0.047) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Median DSS was 48 months. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year DSS rates were 79.2%, 53.1% and 40.9%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, predictors of DSS were extension of surgery (P = 0.004), margin status (P = 0.011), histological grade of recurrent tumor (P = 0.008), and disease free interval (DFI) (P = 0.020). As regards histological subtype of recurrent RPS, at univariate analysis, well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS) was associated with better OS and DSS (P = 0.052 and P = 0.016 respectively) compared to dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS).ConclusionsAccording to our findings, surgery is more beneficial in patients with low-grade sarcoma, WDLS and long DFI. The achievement of clear resection margins, rather than performing a multivisceral resection, appears to be a key factor to improve OS and DSS.     

Prognostic impact of infectious complications after curative gastric cancer surgery

IntroductionThere have been few studies about the effect of infectious complications on recurrence or long-term survival outcome after curative gastric cancer surgery in large populations. This study was conducted to investigate the impact of infectious complications on long-term survival after curative gastrectomy in high volume center.MethodFrom January 2002 to December 2012, patients who underwent curative gastrectomy were enrolled. Infectious complications were defined as wound infection, intra-abdominal infection or postoperative pneumonia. Five-year overall survival was compared between two groups and followed by multivariable analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model.ResultOf 6585 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy, 413 (6.2%) had infectious complications after curative gastrectomy. The five-year overall survival rate was 86.0% in non-complication patients and 74.1% in infectious complications patients (P < 0.001). In univariate analysis, Age over 70 years, male sex, higher ASA score, total or proximal gastrectomy, advanced stage and infectious complication had statistically worse survival. A Cox proportional hazards model indicated that the infectious complication was independent prognostic factor (HR = 1.478, CI 95% 1.242–1.757 p < 0.001) as well as age over 70 years (HR = 2.434, CI 95% 2.168–2.734 p < 0.001), male sex (HR = 1.153, CI 95% 1.022–1.302 p = 0.014), higher ASA score (p < 0.001) and advanced Stage (p < 0.001). Local recurrence (P = 0.044), LN recurrence (P = 0.038) and hematologic recurrence (P = 0.033) were significantly associated with infectious complications.ConclusionPostoperative infectious complication was an independent prognostic factor for five-year overall survival after curative gastrectomy as well as known factors. A significant association between infectious complications and recurrence were also noted. The surgeon should try to prevent the infectious complications in gastric cancer surgery to improve the long term survival.     

Extraskeletal osteosarcoma: A European Musculoskeletal Oncology Society study on 266 patients

PurposePrognosis of extraskeletal osteosarcoma (ESOS) is reported to be poorer than that of skeletal osteosarcoma. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to evaluate factors influencing ESOS prognosis.Patients and methodsMembers of the European Musculoskeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS) submitted institutional data on patients with ESOS.ResultsData from 274 patients treated from 1981 to 2014 were collected from 16 EMSOS centres; 266 patients were eligible. Fifty (18.7%) had metastases at diagnosis. Of 216 patients with localised disease, 211 (98%) underwent surgery (R0 = 70.6%, R1 = 27%). Five-year overall survival (OS) for all 266 patients was 47% (95% CI 40–54%). Five-year OS for metastatic patients was 27% (95% CI 13–41%). In the analysis restricted to the 211 localised patients who achieved complete remission after surgery 5-year OS was 51.4% (95% CI 44–59%) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 43% (95% CI 35–51%). One hundred twenty-one patients (57.3%) received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 80 patients (37.9%) received radiotherapy. A favourable trend was seen for osteosarcoma-type chemotherapy versus soft tissue sarcoma-type (doxorubicin ± ifosfamide) regimens. For the 211 patients in complete remission after surgery, patient age, tumour size, margins and chemotherapy were positive prognostic factors for DFS and OS by univariate analysis.At multivariate analysis, patient age (≤40 years versus >40 years) (P = 0.05), tumour size (P = 0.0001) and receipt of chemotherapy (P = 0.006) were statistically significant prognostic factors for survival.ConclusionPatient age and tumour size are factors influencing ESOS prognosis. Higher survival was observed in patients who received perioperative chemotherapy with a trend in favour of multiagent osteosarcoma-type regimen which included doxorubicin, ifosfamide and cisplatin.     

Postoperative follow-up for gastric cancer needs to be individualized according to age,tumour recurrence pattern,and recurrence time

BackgroundFew studies have reported the association between the pattern and time point of recurrence in different groups stratified by age in postoperative survival of patients with gastric cancer.MethodsThe clinicopathological data and recurrence data of 2028 patients with GC who underwent curative surgery from January 2010 to March 2015 were enrolled in this study. Patients were grouped according to age: young group (YG) (≤45 years old) (n = 180) and non-young group (OG) (>45 years old) (n = 1848).ResultsA total of 2028 patients were enrolled. The young group had better 5-year OS and DFS than the non-young group. In peritoneal recurrence, the cumulative incidence of recurrence in YG was higher than that in OG (P < 0.001). In distant recurrence, the cumulative incidence of recurrence YG was always lower than that of OG (P = 0.004). Recurrence hazard function varied over time between the two groups:in the peritoneal metastasis, the recurrence hazard for YG was higher and earlier than that of OG and the YG was observed during five years after surgery with two recurrence peaks in 8.5 months and in 41.5 months. In distant recurrence, the recurrence hazard for OG had an earlier and higher single peak than that of YG (6.0 months).ConclusionThe recurrence characteristics of patients with gastric cancer after curative resection between young group and older group are different. Personalized follow-up strategies should be developed according to the age and time point after operation for the early detection of recurrence and making decision for further treatment.     

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) for gastric cancer in a tertiary referral center in Hong Kong.MethodsTwo hundred and ninety-four consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy with curative intent between January 2008 and December 2015 were analyzed. Data was prospectively collected and reviewed. Propensity score matching was applied at a ratio of 1:1 to compare the OG and LG groups.ResultsAfter propensity score matching, operation duration (294.7 vs 231.8min, P < 0.01) was significantly longer while estimated blood loss (191.6 vs 351.0 ml, P = 0.01) was significantly less in LG group compared with OG. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications and mortality between LG and OG groups (postoperative complication rate, 35.2% vs 40.7%, P = 0.69; 90-day mortality rate, 1.9% vs 3.7%, P = 1.00). Three-year OS and 3-yr DFS of patients who underwent LG was not inferior to that of patients who had OG (P = 0.34; P = 0.51). However, there were significantly more peritoneal recurrences among the OG group than LG group (P < 0.01).ConclusionsLG has comparable outcomes for gastric cancer, even in advanced tumors. We could appropriately increase the proportion of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.     

Indications for neoadjuvant treatment based on risk factors for poor prognosis before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

IntroductionThe oncological benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical risk factors for poor prognosis before and after NAC for decision making regarding additional treatment in patients with LARC.Materials and methodsWe examined a total of 96 patients with MRI-defined poor-risk locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer treated by NAC alone between 2006 and 2018. Survival outcomes and clinical risk factors for poor prognosis before and after NAC were analyzed.ResultsIn the median follow-up duration after surgery of 60 months (3–120), the rates of 5-year overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and local recurrence (LR) were 83.6%, 78.4%, and 8.2%, respectively. In the multivariate analyses, patients with cT4 disease had a significantly higher risk of poor OS (HR; 6.10, 95% CI; 1.32–28.15, P = 0.021) than those with cT3 disease. After NAC, ycN+ was significantly associated with a higher risk of poor OS (HR; 5.92, 95% CI; 1.27–27.62, P = 0.024) and RFS (HR; 2.55, 95% CI; 1.01–6.48, P = 0.048) than ycN-. In addition, patients with CEA after NAC (post-CEA) ≥ 5 ng/ml had a significantly higher risk LR (HR; 5.63, 95% CI; 1.06–29.93, P = 0.043).ConclusionNAC alone had an insufficient survival effect on patients with cT4 disease, ycN+, or an elevated post-CEA level. In contrast, NAC alone is a potential treatment for other patients with LARC.     

Hepatectomy for ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma classified as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A: The optimal treatment

Background and aimsRuptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) generally has a very poor prognosis and is currently classified as T4 in the tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the actual impact of rHCC, as well as the positive effect of hepatectomy in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0/A rHCC.MethodsWe enrolled 86 patients with rHCC after surgery and 526 patients with non-rHCC after surgery or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method to compare the postoperative prognosis of patients with rHCC with that of patients with non-rHCC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors affecting patient survival.ResultsBCLC stage 0/A rHCC treated with surgery had a worse prognosis than BCLC stage 0/A non-rHCC treated with surgery (overall survival [OS]: hazard ratio [HR] = 3.12 [2.24–4.34], P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival [RFS]: HR = 2.26 [1.65–3.09], P < 0.001). Rupture was an independent prognostic factor in patients with BCLC stage 0/A rHCC (OS: HR = 1.685 [1.416–2.006], P < 0.001; RFS: HR = 1.484 [1.267–1.737], P < 0.001), and patients with BCLC stage 0/A rHCC who underwent surgery had a comparable prognosis to patients with BCLC stage B HCC who underwent surgery or TACE (OS: P = 0.78).ConclusionsPatients classified as having BCLC stage 0/A rHCC can achieve comparable outcomes to patients with BCLC stage B HCC after hepatectomy. However, not all patients with rHCC should be classified as T4 in the TNM staging system.     

Risk prediction models for postoperative outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery in the older population - a systematic review

BackgroundAn increasing number of patients with Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is 65 years or older. We aimed to systematically review existing clinical prediction models for postoperative outcomes of CRC surgery, study their performance in older patients and assess their potential for preoperative decision making.MethodsA systematic search in Pubmed and Embase for original studies of clinical prediction models for outcomes of CRC surgery. Bias and relevance for preoperative decision making with older patients were assessed using the CHARMS guidelines.Results26 prediction models from 25 publications were included. The average age of included patients ranged from 61 to 76. Two models were exclusively developed for 65 and older. Common outcomes were mortality (n = 10), anastomotic leakage (n = 7) and surgical site infections (n = 3). No prediction models for quality of life or physical functioning were identified. Age, gender and ASA score were common predictors; 12 studies included intraoperative predictors. For the majority of the models, bias for model development and performance was considered moderate to high.ConclusionsPrediction models are available that address mortality and surgical complications after CRC surgery. Most models suffer from methodological limitations, and their performance for older patients is uncertain. Models that contain intraoperative predictors are of limited use for preoperative decision making. Future research should address the predictive value of geriatric characteristics to improve the performance of prediction models for older patients.     

A Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Surgery With or Without Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap Reconstruction for Breast Cancer

BackgroundThere is little information on the oncological outcomes of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with immediate reconstruction using a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (LDMF) for breast cancer compared with BCS alone.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study from a single institution comparing the margin positivity rates after initial surgery, re-excision rates, and local recurrence (LR) between BCS with immediate LDMF reconstruction (n = 145) and BCS alone (n = 1040) performed from 2012 to 2017 for newly diagnosed stage 0-3 breast cancer.ResultsThe positive rates of surgical margin after initial surgery were significantly lower in the BCS with LDMF group than in the BCS alone group (4.1 vs. 10.8%; P = .006). There were no marked differences in the re-excision rates between the BCS with LDMF and BCS alone groups (P = .1). At a median follow-up of 61 months, the surgical method (BCS with LD vs. BCS alone) was not associated with the LR-free survival after adjusting for various clinicopathologic factors (P = .8).ConclusionOur findings suggest that BCS with immediate LDMF reconstruction is oncologically safe for breast cancer compared with BCS alone. However, further studies are needed.     

Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: The prognostic impact of baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte,platelet-lymphocyte and lymphocyte-monocyte ratios

PurposeIn this retrospective analysis we sought to determine if the preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) were predictive of both operability and survival in those patients presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC) who underwent cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC).MethodsAnalysis included all patients admitted between 2009 and 2017 with PC from CRC who were treated with curative intent by CRS-Mitomycin C-HIPEC. Patients were assessed pre- and intra-operatively by the PC index (PCI) and by a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score with calculation of Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Discrimination was made for NLR >3.5, PLR >168.8 and LMR >4.4.ResultsWe identified 98 CRC patients undergoing 105 CRS-HIPEC procedures. There were no associations detected between NLR/PLR/LMR and the rates of incomplete or abandoned CRS cases. Overall survival (OS) after CRS-HIPEC was worse with high versus low NLR (19.9 mths vs. 45.7 mths, respectively; P = 0.009) and also with low versus high LMR (27.1 mths vs. 53.2 mths, respectively; P = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, a low LMR (P = 0.008), the preoperative CT PCI value (P = 0.004), poor tumor differentiation (P = 0.023) and the preoperative CEA level (P < 0.001) were all independent variables associated with a worse OS after surgery.ConclusionsThe baseline LMR value may have potential value as a selection tool for CRS-HIPEC in patients with CRC-related PC.     

Retrospective Study to Examine Prognostic Value of C-Reactive Protein in Patients With Surgically Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundThis study evaluated the association between elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and clinical outcomes among adults treated with surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the US.Materials and MethodsAdults with NSCLC who underwent lung cancer surgery and had ≥1 CRP measurement prior to, or >1 month following, index surgery were identified in the Optum Clinformatics claims database. The association between elevated CRP (>10 mg/L) and risk of NSCLC recurrence/death was assessed separately during the 6 months before surgery (pre surgery cohort) and 2 years following surgery (post-surgery cohort) using multivariate regressions and Kaplan-Meier analysis.ResultsAfter adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics among patients in the pre surgery cohort with index surgery between 2016 to 2020 (n = 104), the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for NSCLC recurrence between elevated vs. non-elevated CRP was 2.17 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.03-4.60; P = .04). In the post surgery cohort (n = 264), the adjusted IRR for disease recurrence (elevated vs. non-elevated CRP) was 2.22 (95% CI=1.05-4.70; P = .04). In the pre surgery cohort, the odds of death were nearly two-fold (odds ratio [OR]=1.91; 95% CI=1.06-3.42; P = .03) among patients with elevated CRP. In the post surgery cohort, the OR was 1.62 (95% CI=0.88-2.97; P = .12). Among those with persistently elevated CRP prior to surgery, there was a significant overall trend of increased CRP over the 5-year period.ConclusionThese results support the association between elevated CRP and a higher risk of NSCLC recurrence/death in pre- and postsurgery cohorts. This study may shed lights on inflammation-suppressing treatments in patients with NSCLC.     

Experience of young women diagnosed with breast cancer who undergo fertility preservation consultation

BackgroundFertility preservation (FP) is of increasing concern to young patients with breast cancer. The American Society of Clinical Oncology has recommended referral to a reproductive specialist as early as possible before beginning systemic adjuvant therapy.AimTo gather information from young patients with breast cancer about their experiences with FP referral, consultation, and decision making.MethodsAn anonymous questionnaire was mailed to consecutive patients with breast cancer who were referred, from January 2005 to January 2010, from our center to the CReATe fertility clinic. Topics included demographics; cancer stage and treatment; previous fertility problems; referral source and timing; options presented and chosen; and satisfaction with the referral, consultation, and decision-making processes.ResultsOf the 53 women identified, 27 (51%) participated. The mean age was 31 years (range, 24-41 years). Fifteen (56%) women opted for embryo or oocyte cryopreservation, 2 for ovarian suppression, and 10 for no FP. The choice was not affected by disease stage or by already having a child. Of the 22 women who responded, 14 (64%) were satisfied or very satisfied overall. Eighteen out of 23 (78%) respondents felt that the right amount of information was given. Thirty-nine percent had difficulty with decision making, but only 1 (4%) woman indicated that cost was a deciding factor. A common theme among respondents was inadequate time for decision making. A common complaint was the lack of written material before and/or after their consultation. Sixty-three percent expressed an interest in meeting with a psychosocial counselor.Conclusions(1) FP referral should be initiated by the surgeon as soon as a diagnosis of invasive cancer is made, (2) women need written materials before and after FP consultation is needed, and (3) a FP counselor who is able to spend additional time after the consultation could help with decision making.