The Effect of VVI Pacing and Resultant Atrioventricular Dyssynchrony on Segmental Volumes

Left and right ventricular volumes were monitored simultaneously in four anesthetized dogs by intracardiac impedance ventriculography during normal sinus rhythm, spontaneous ventricular rhythm, and VVI and VDD pacing. Cardiac output was found to increase with VVI pacing rate but remained somewhat lower than normal sinus or VDD values. The dissynchronous atrial contraction was found to distort the volume waveforms but had little effect on right ventricular volumes. Left atrial contraction had the greatest impact on left ventricular filling at near normal AV delays. Cardiac output during VDD pacing was found to be a maximum at 170 msec and decreased in three of four dogs at 220 msec. Examination of volume waveforms during "filling" indicates that the right ventricle is dominated by passive filling while the left ventricle demonstrates a large active or "fast" filling phase.     

Pacemakers of the 1980s. An overview

Methods and devices for permanent cardiac pacing remained relatively stable for over two decades with use of the single-chamber ventricular demand (VVI) pacemaker. However, changes have occurred in the 1980s and are expected to continue with the availability of more advanced technology and with increasing knowledge about cardiac pacing. The physiologic benefit of the newer dual-chamber atrial synchronous (VDD) and fully automatic, universal (DDD) pacemakers over the VVI pacemaker in patients with permanent complete heart block and normal sinus node function has been established. These newer units not only reestablish atrioventricular synchrony but also are physiologically rate-responsive. The VDD pacemaker is expected to be phased out in favor of the DDD pacemaker. When the atrial rate or interval is lower than the lower rate limit, the VDD pacemaker functions as a VVI, whereas the DDD pacemaker functions as an atrioventricular sequential (DVI) pacemaker to maintain continuous atrioventricular synchrony. Contrary to general belief, patients with complete heart block and normal sinus node function may gain very little physiologic benefit, if any, from DVI pacing. The sinus node will compete with the pacemaker's atrial stimulation when the sinus rate is faster than the DVI pacemaker rate (which usually occurs during activity). Also, the ventricular pacing rate will not vary with physiologic change. The DVI and atrial demand (AAI) pacemakers have been used in some patients with sinus node dysfunction. Increasing exercise tolerance should not be expected in the majority of patients because they are not pacemaker-dependent during activity, ie, their heart rate is higher than the pacemaker rate. However, these pacemakers appear to help in eliminating pacemaker syndrome, which does not infrequently occur with VVI pacemakers. Patients with sinus node dysfunction but without atrioventricular block do not gain more physiologic benefit with a DDD than with a DVI pacemaker. Whether these patients have severe sinus node dysfunction all the time or adequate sinus node function most of the time during follow-up, the DDD pacemaker will function as a noncommitted DVI with atrial sensing (DDI). The early report of DVI pacemaker-induced atrial fibrillation during follow-up has been refuted by more recent works. If the DDD pacemaker is significantly more expensive than the DVI pacemaker, the latter type may be a good alternative for this condition.     

A Time-Related Study of the Hemodynamic Benefit of Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing Evaluated by Doppler Echocardiography

We have used Doppler echocardiography to estimate the stroke volume (SV) in a study of 13 patients equipped with DDD pacemakers. SV was measured both during DDD and VVI pacing after observation times of 1,3,6, and 12 months of DDD pacing. SV was also measured at seven atrioventricular (AV) intervals (75-250 ms) in the search for optimal AV intervals. Mitral flow velocity was investigated to see if DDD pacing resulted in synchronous atrial contraction, and if mitral insufficiency existed at any of the pacing modes. Compared with the VVI mode, DDD pacing resulted in a mean increase in SV of 21 +/- 2% for the four observation periods. Two patients with severe left ventricular failure had no significant increase in SV during DDD vs VVI pacing. In each patient, an optimal AV interval ranging between 100-250 ms for the SV was found. Velocity profiles of mitral flow showed synchronous atrial contraction during DDD pacing, but not during VVI pacing. Mitral insufficiency was not seen in any pacing mode. DDD pacing resulted in a reduction in SV during the first 6 months, and was constant thereafter. Doppler echocardiography can be used repeatedly to evaluate the hemodynamic response of DDD pacing vs VVI pacing, and to find which AV interval gives the highest SV in the individual patient. Our study further shows that the hemodynamic benefit of DDD pacing is present after short-term as well as after long-term DDD pacing.     

Long-term complication rates in ventricular, single lead VDD, and dual chamber pacing

A higher incidence of pacemaker related complications has been reported in DDD systems as compared to VVI devices. The implantation of single lead VDD pacemakers might reduce the complication rate of physiological pacing in patients with AV block. In a retrospective study, the data records of 1,214 consecutive patients with pacemaker implantation for AV block between 1990 and 2001 (VVI 36.5%, DDD 32.9%, VDD 30.6%) were analyzed. Complications requiring surgical interventions were compared during a follow-up period of 64 +/- 31 months. Operation and fluoroscopic times were longer in DDD pacemaker implantation compared to VDD and VVI devices:58 +/- 23 versus 39 +/- 10 and 37 +/- 13 minutes (P<0.001), 9.2 +/- 5.2 versus 4.1 +/- 2.4 and 3.5 +/- 2.3 minutes, respectively. Differences remained significant after correction for covariates. In a multivariate Cox regression model, the corrected complication hazard of a DDD pacemaker implantation was increased by 3.9 (1.4-11.3) compared to VVI and increased by 2.3 (1.1-4.5) compared to VDD pacing. Higher complication rates in DDD pacing were mainly due to a higher incidence of early reoperation for atrial lead dysfunction, whereas the long-term complication rate was not different from VDD or VVI pacing. Early and long-term complication rates did not differ between VDD and VVI pacemaker systems. In conclusion, operation time and complication rates of physiological pacing are reduced by VDD pacemaker implantation achieving values comparable to VVI pacing. Thus, single lead VDD pacing can be recommended for patients with AV block.     

Single versus dual chamber pacing in the young: noninvasive comparative evaluation of cardiac function

The advantages of atrial synchrony over asynchronous ventricular pacing remain unclear in the young, chronically right ventricular (RV) - paced patient. This is in contrast to the older patient with inherent diastolic dysfunction who has been shown to benefit from atrial synchrony with dual chamber (DDD,R/VDD), over single chamber rate response (VVI,R) ventricular pacing. The goal of this study was to noninvasively assess cardiac function in a group of young, RV-paced patients before and after establishment of atrial synchrony. Echocardiographic data were retrospectively analyzed from 10 patients with congenital or acquired complete AV block, who were VVI,R paced for 10.2 +/- 2 years (mean age at study 19.2 +/- 8.9 years), and were subsequently converted to DDD,R/VDD pacing (mean age at study 20.7 +/- 9.5 years). Paired t-test analysis of left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function during VVI,R versus DDD,R/VDD pacing did not result in any short-term difference in LV short axis fractional area of change or FAC (53% +/- 7.5% vs 56.8% +/- 8.7%) or mitral maximal velocity (E) normalized to mitral flow velocity time integral (VTI) (5.2/s +/- 1.5 vs 4.4/s +/- 1.5). A decrease in mitral flow E/A ratio was observed after short-term DDD,R/VDD pacing (2.2 +/- 0.5 vs 1.9 +/- 0.3). Atrial synchronous dual chamber pacing in young patients with complete AV block does not lead to any appreciable early change in global LV function over single-site RV pacing. Therefore, early establishment of atrial synchrony in the young asymptomatic VVI,R-paced patient with normal intrinsic ventricular function may not be warranted.     

AV Delay Optimization and Management of DDD Paced Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Ten DDD paced patients, suffering front dilated cardiomyopathy in the NYHA functional classes III or IV were studied by means of Doppler ecbocardiography at different programmed values of atrioventricular (AV) delay (200, 150, 120, 100, and 80 msec). The following variables were evaluated: LV diameter, ejection fraction, mitral and aortic flow velocity integrals, and stroke volume. During VDD pacing, a resting AV delay associated with the best diastolic filling and systolic function was identified and programmed individually. Shortening of the AV delay to about 100 msec was associated with a gradual and progressive improvement. Further decrease caused an impairment of systolic function. The patients were clinically and beinodynamically reevaluated after 2 months of follow-up. A reduction of NYHA class and an improvement of LV function were consistently found. The reported data suggest that programming of an optimal A V delay may improve myocardial function in DDD paced patients with congestive heart failure. This result may be the consequence of an optimization of left ventricular filling and a better use of the Frank-Starling law.     

The Effect of Posture on the Response to Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing in Patients with Underlying Cardiovascular Disease

In order to determine whether the hemodynamic benefit of atrioventricular synchronous pacing is maintained in the upright position, 14 patients with dual chamber pacemakers were paced in VVI mode and DDD mode in both the supine and standing position. The hemodynamic response was assessed by measuring the velocity time integral derived from the pulsed-wave Doppler signal in the left ventricular outflow tract during VVI pacing and dual chamber pacing at three different AV delays (125, 200, 250 ms). In the supine position, the velocity time integral during VVI pacing was 14.6 ± 3.0 cm and this increased during DDD pacing at all three AV delays (17.7 ± 3.3, 17.9 ± 3,0, 17.5 ± 3.5 cm). In the upright position, the velocity time integral during VVI pacing was 12.9 ± 3.5 cm and this increased with DDD pacing (15.5 ± 3.3, 15. 1 ± 4.0, 15.1 ± 3.9 cm). It was concluded that although stroke volume decreases when assuming the upright position, the beneficial response to dual chamber pacing is maintained and equals that observed in the supine position.     

Septal Short Atrioventricular Delay Pacing: Additional Hemodynamic Improvements in Heart Failure

Controversy exists as to whether short AV delay pacing is beneficial in left ventricular dysfunction with the studies performed coming to disparate conclusions. The right ventricular apical pacing previously studied results in asynchronous contraction and relaxation sequences and may limit the potential benefits of short AV delay pacing. In this study the hemodynamic effects of septal (resulting in a more physiological activation sequence) and apical right ventricular activation were compared in 15 patients with heart failure. VDD pacing with AV delays of 50,100, and 150 msec was evaluated. Apical VDD pacing did not increase the cardiac output significantly, 4.1 ± 0.75 to 4.45 ± 0.74 L/min, whereas septal VDD pacing increased the cardiac output to 4.86 ± 0.79 L/min (P = 0.037). Apical pacing increased the cardiac output in 10 patients and septal pacing in 11 patients. We conclude that selected patients with ventricular dysfunction benefit from short AV delay pacing. Septal ventricular activation confers significant hemodynamic improvements over apical activation.     

VDD Pacing at Short Atrioventricular Intervals Does Not Improve Cardiac Output in Patients with Dilated Heart Failure

Atrial synchronous pacing with short, nonphysiologicai atrioventricular (AV) intervals has been reported to increase cardiac output in selected patients with severe dilated heart failure. The aim of this study was to determine the acute effect of atrial synchronous pacing with short AV intervals in a consecutive series of patients with dilated heart failure. Twelve patients with a mean ejection fraction of 21 %± standard error 2.5% were studied. Pacing catheters were placed in the high right atrium and right ventricular apex and a balloon flotation catheter in the pulmonary artery for measurement of cardiac output. Simultaneous transthoracic echocardiography was performed for measurement of left ventricular filling time and mitral regurgitation. In a randomized crossover design, measurements were made during VDD pacing at programmed AV intervals of 100 and 60 msec and during a control period in sinus rhythm. Left ventricular filling time increased at AV intervals of 100 and 60 msec (mean difference 37 ± 9 and 34 ± 11 msec, respectively, both P < 0.01 compared to control). Despite increases in ventricular filling time, stroke, and cardiac index declined with short atrioventricular intervals (at an AV interval of 60 msec, stroke index fell by 2.1 ± 0.5 mL/m², P < 0.05 and cardiac index by 125 ± 45 mL/m²; P = NS). Heart rate was unchanged at both AV intervals (78 ± 4.9 at control, 78 ± 5.2 at 100 msec and 79 ± 4.9 beats/min at 60 msec; P = NS). The decrease in stroke index at an AV Interval of 60 msec was inversely related to control left ventricular filling time (r = 0.74; P = 0.01) and ejection fraction (r = 0.69; P = 0.02) and directly related to heart rate (r = 0.77; P < 0.01). The change in stroke index at an AV delay of 60 msec was also inversely related to the change in mitral regurgitation induced by pacing (r = 0.84; P = 0.01). Thus, in a group of patients with stable dilated heart failure, atrial synchronous pacing with short AV intervals did not improve cardiac output. The change in cardiac output with pacing was inversely related to baseline left ventricular function and to the change in mitral regurgitation induced by pacing.     

CDFI评价房室非同步,同步起搏对血流动力学的影响

本文应用彩色多普勒血流显像仪对17例安置永久性心脏起搏器患者进行了血流动力学研究。结果表明:房室同步起搏的SV、CO及PFVE、ETVI、PFVE/PFVA较之房室非同步起搏明显增加,房室非同步起搏后SBP、MAP降低、体重增加、心房内径增大、瓣膜返流率高,提示房室非同步起搏对瓣膜功能、血流动力学影响明显,是促发起搏器综合征(PMS)的主要动因。     

Importance of Heart Rate Response During Exercise in Patients Using Atrioventricular Synchronous and Ventricular Pacemakers

Atrioventricular synchronous pacing offers advantages over fixed-rate ventricular (VVI) pacing both at rest and during exercise. This study compared the hemodynamic effects at rest and exercise of ventricular pacing at a rate of 70 beats/min, ventricular pacing where the rate was increased during exercise and dual chamber pacing. Ten patients, age 63 +/- 8 years, with multiprogrammable DDD pacemakers were studied using supine bicycle radionuclide ventriculography. Radionuclide data during dual chamber pacing was acquired at rest and during a submaximal workload of 200-400 kpm/min. The pacemakers were then programmed to VVI pacing at a rate of 70 beats/min, and 1 week later, studies were repeated in the VVI mode at rest, during exercise at a rate of 70 beats/min, and during exercise with the VVI pacemaker programmed to a rate adapted to the DDD pacing exercise rate. At rest, the cardiac output was lower in the VVI compared with the AV sequential mode (4.1 +/- 1.1 vs 5.7 +/- 1.1 1/min, P less than 0.01). During exercise, the cardiac output increased from resting values in the DDD and VVI pacing modes, however cardiac output in the rate-adapted VVI mode was higher than in the VVI mode with the rate maintained at 70 beats/min (8.1 +/- 1.5 vs 6.3 +/- 1.1 1/min, P = 0.02). Three patients completed lower workloads with VVI pacing at 70 beats/min compared with AV synchronous pacing. At rest, AV sequential pacing was superior to VVI pacing, suggesting the importance of the atrial contribution to ventricular filling. With VVI pacing during exercise, cardiac output was improved with an increased pacemaker rate, suggesting that the heart rate response during exercise was the major determinant of the higher cardiac output.     

Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers

LAU, C.-P., ET AL.: Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers. The relative hemodynamic profile between dual chamber pacing (DDD) and activity sensing rate responsive pacing (VVIR) was compared in ten patients with dual chamber rate responsive pacemakers (Synergist 11). With a double blind, randomized exercise protocol, DDDR pacemakers were programmed into VVI, VVIR, and DDD (AV interval 150 msec) modes and in seven patients the test in the DDD mode was repeated with the AV interval programmed at 75 msec. A treadmill exercise test of 6-minutes duration (2 stages, Stage 1 at 2 mph, 0% gradient and Stage II at 2 mph, 15% gradient) was performed at each of the programmed settings, with a rest period of 30 minutes in between tests. Cardiac output was assessed using continuous-wave Doppler sampling ascending aortic flow and expressed as a percentage of the value achieved during VVI pacing. During exercise, pacing rate between DDD and VVIR pacing was similar but was higher with DDD at the first minute of recovery (91 ± 4vs 81 ± 3 beat/min, respectively). Cardiac output was significantly higher at rest, during low level exercise, and recovery with DDD pacing compared with VVIR pacing (resting: 21 ± 14 vs -2 ± 7%; Stage I: 36 ± 6 vs 16 ± 7%; Stage II: 25 ± 15 vs 10 ± 8%; recovery: 26 ± 12 vs 4 ± 9%; p < 0.05 in all cases). Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher during low level of exercise in the DDD mode. Shortening of the AV interval to 75 msec did not significantly affect cardiac output during exercise, but cardiac output after exercise was reduced (2 ± 6 vs 23 ± 6% at an AV interval of 150 msec, p < 0.02). By enhancing the stroke volume, DDD pacing improves cardiac hemodynamics at rest, during low level exercise, and early postexercise recovery.     

A Double-Blind Study of Submaximal Exercise Tolerance and Variation in Paced Rate in Atrial Synchronous Compared to Activity Sensor Modulated Ventricular Pacing

To assess the variation in paced rate during everyday activity and the importance of atrioventricular synchronization (AV synchrony) for submaximal exercise tolerance, atrial synchronous (DDD) and activity rate modulated ventricular (VVI,R) pacing were compared in 17 patients with high degree AV block. The patients were randomly assigned to either mode and evaluated by treadmill exercise to moderate exertion and by 24-hour Holter monitoring after 2 months in the DDD and VVI,R modes, respectively. At the end of the study, the patients were programmed to the pacing mode corresponding to the preferred study period. During the treadmill test, the mean exercise time to submaximal exertion (Borg 5/10), exertion ratings and respiratory rate did not differ between pacing modes despite a significantly lower ventricular rate in the VVI,R mode. The atrial rate during VVI,R pacing was significantly higher than the ventricular rate, but did not differ from the ventricular rate during DDD pacing. There was a diurnal variation in paced rate in both pacing modes. Paced ventricular rate was, however, higher and variation in paced rate greater in DDD compared to VVI,R pacing. Nine patients preferred the DDD mode, three patients preferred the VVI,R mode, while five subjects did not express any preference. The results from this study indicate that the variation in paced rate during activity sensor-driven VVI,R pacing does not match that during DDD pacing neither during everyday activities nor during submaximal treadmill exercise. Nevertheless, no differences in exercise time, Borg ratings, and respiratory rate during submaximal exercise were found. Thus, for most patients with high degree AV block, DDD and VVI,R pacing seem equally satisfactory for submaximal exercise.     

Comparison of Intrinsic Versus Paced Ventricular Function

There is increasing evidence supporting the benefits of providing optimum AV delay in cardiac pacing, though controversy exists regarding its value and the benefits of intrinsic versus paced ventricular activation. This study compared various AV delays at rest in patients whose native AV delays were 200 msec. Only patients with DDD pacemakers who had intact AV conduction and normal ventricular activation were included in the study. Nine patients were studied. Methods: Ten studies were performed. Evaluation was done in AAI and DDD modes at paced heart rates of 60/min or as close as possible to the intrinsic heart rate if this was > 60/min. Stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (COJ were measured. Results: When AV sequential pacing in the DDD mode with an optimum AV delay was compared to AAI pacing with a prolonged AV interval, the average optimum AV delay in the DDD mode was 157 msec and ranged from 125 to 175 msec. The average AV interval in the AAI mode was 245 msec and ranged from 212 to 300 msec. In the DDD mode, there was an overall significant improvement in CO of 11% and SV of 9%. Patients with intrinsic AV conduction times of > 220 msec showed an overall significant improvement in CO of 13% and SV of 11%. In patients with intrinsic AV conduction times of < 220 msec, an improvement in CO of 6% and SV of 4% was seen. Conclusions: (1) An optimum AV delay is an important component of hemodynamic performance; and (2) AV sequential pacing at rest with an optimum AV delay may provide better hemodynamic performance than atrial pacing with intrinsic ventricular conduction when native AV conduction is prolonged > 220 msec.     

Successful Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia by Physiological Pacing

The case is presented of a young patient with atrioventricular (AV) block but no evidence of other disease; in this patient exercise or stress-related syncope continued after implantation of a ventricular inhibited (VVI) pacemaker. Investigation revealed exercise-induced limited rapid multiform ventricular tachycardia (VT) which was associated with faintness or syncope. Temporary atrial triggered ventricular inhibited ventricular (VDD) pacing resulted in enhanced exercise tolerance with no significant arrhythmia. A permanent full function dual chamber [DDD] pacemaker was implanted and prevented the VT. There have been no further exercise-related symptoms during two years 0f follow up.     

DDI Pacing: Indications, Expectations, and Follow-Up

The DDI mode of pacing that permits noncompetitive atrioventricular sequential bradycardia support was chosen in 65 of 480 (14%) patients selected for dual chamber pacing between February 1985 and March 1990. All patients were implanted with Pacesetter 283 or 285 pulse generators and programmed to DDI. The indications for pacing were sick sinus syndrome (n = 52), combined sinus node dysfunction and AV block (n = 13). Forty-two of these patients had a history of paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias. All patients received passive fixation atrial and ventricular leads. Follow-up thereafter was performed predischarge, and at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after discharge. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1-61 months (mean 31 months). Fifty-four of 65 (83%) patients chosen for DDI remain programmed in the DDI mode. Three patients were reprogrammed to VVI and eight to DDD. During the course of follow-up, six patients presented with effective VVI pacing with consistent ventriculoatrial conduction that was appropriately sensed by the atrial circuit with atrial output inhibition. A further four patients presented with "functional undersensing" due to ventricular blanking period (VBP) characteristics in these pulse generators and in this mode. Functional undersensing was eliminated in all but one patient by reprogramming the VBP to 13 msec with no subsequent episodes of provoked crosstalk inhibition. Effective VVI pacing was observed in patients with AV block during times of sinus acceleration. While DDI mode is an effective form of pacing, permitting non-competitive atrioventricular sequential pacing, potential limitations include: effective VVI pacing during intact ventriculoatrial conduction, functional undersensing when long VBP are programmed, and effective VI pacing with sinus node acceleration during AV block.     

The Hemodynamic Importance of Atrial Systole: A Function of the Kinetic Energy of Blood Flow?

The relative importance of atrial systole on left ventricular filling was investigated at rest and during exercise in 25 patients with dual chamber pacemakers. The mean blood flow velocity over the atrial valve, the velocities of the rapid filling phase (E), the active filling phase (A), and the E/ A ratio were determined for pulsed Doppler-echocardiography. The patients were first examined at rest during AV sequential pacing (DVI) at 70 and 104 beats/mm. The investigation was subsequently repeated during atrial synchronous pacing (VDD) at rest and during supine submaximal exercise at workloads adjusted to achieve heart rates corresponding to those during DVI pacing. The mean blood flow velocity at rest did not differ between DVI and VDD pacing at 70 beats/mm (0.46 vs 0.49 m/sec). When (he resting heart rate was increased to 104 beats/min (DVI) the mean blood flow velocity increased to 0.56 msec (P < 0.001). At a corresponding heart rate during exercise (VDD) the velocity increased to 0.70 msec (P < 0.001). At a resting heart rate of 70 beats/min the E/A ratio (n = 14) did not differ significantly between DVI and VDD pacing. With an increased resting heart rate (DVI) the E/A ratio decreased from 0,94 ± 0.45 to 0.78 ± 0.18; NS. When the heart rate increased during exercise (VDD) the E/A ratio increased from 0.75 ± 0.14 to 0.97 ± 0.16; P < 0.001. There was a positive correlation between the increase of the mean blood flow velocity and the increase of the E/A ratio during exercise (r = 0.69, P < 0,01). No such correlation was found when the heart rate was changed at rest. Thus, the importance of atrial systole on ventricular filling diminishes during exercise in accordance with increasing blood flow velocity, which by physical principles is related to the kinetic energy. The relative importance of atrial systole is hence inversely correlated to the kinetic energy of the blood flow.     

Is DDD Pacing Superior to VVI,R? A Study on Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Myocardial Oxygen Consumption at Rest and During Exercise

Rate responsive ventricular pacing (VVI,R) has been demonstrated to equal atrial synchronous ventricular pacing (DDD) with regard to hemodynamics and exercise tolerance. Whether the two modes are also comparable, with regard to cardiac metabolic effects, is not yet dear. We assessed central hemodynamics, cardiac sympathetic nerve activity fcardiac norepinephrine overflow), and myocardial oxygen consumption in 16 patients treated with rate responsive atrial synchronous ventricular pacemakers (DDD,R), due to high degree AV block. The study was performed at rest and during supine exercise at two workloads (30 ± 12 and 68 ± 24 watts, respectively) during VDD and rate matched VVI pacing (VVI_m). Ventricular rates at rest and during both workloads were almost identical. Cardiac output at rest tended to be higher in the VDD mode, due to a slightly higher stroke volume. Central pressures including right atrial pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were similar in the pacing modes. The coronary sinus blood flow, the coronary sinus arteriovenous oxygen difference, and the myocardial oxygen consumption did not differ between the two pacing modes. Cardiac norepinephrine overflow was similar in the two pacing modes, at rest or during exercise. Thus, we found no significant differences between VDD and VVI_m pacing with regard to central hemodynamics, cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (cardiac norepinephrine overflow), or myocardial oxygen consumption either at rest or during moderate exercise.     

Retrograde Supernormal Conduction, Gap Phenomenon in Concealed Accessory Atrioventricular Pathways

We present four patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome who exhibited retrograde supernormal conduction or gap phenomenon in concealed accessory pathways. In the first patient, ventricular extrastimulus testing revealed retrograde block at the coupling interval of 520 msec and reappearance of conduction at the coupling interval of 370 msec. In a second patient, 1:1 retrograde conduction was not present but supernormal conduction was demonstrated at coupling intervals of 360 msec to 310 msec during the ventricular extrastimulus testing when the basic drive consisted of atrioventricular (AV) simultaneous pacing. In a third patient, ventricular extrastimulus testing demonstrated retrograde conduction through the accessory pathway only at coupling intervals of 400 msec to 360 msec. In a fourth patient, retrograde block occurred at the coupling interval of 340 msec and retrograde "slow" conduction reappeared at coupling intervals of 300 msec to 250 msec (gap phenomenon) only when the basic drive consisted of AV simultaneous pacing. Thus, concealed accessory pathways may exhibit retrograde supernormal conduction or gap phenomenon. Ventricular extrastimulus testing consisting of AV simultaneous pacing during the basic drive may facilitate demonstration of these unusual properties.     

A clinical evaluation of the current methods for cardiac pacing electrostimulation

A comparative analysis was done of the results of 250 operations--implantations of the different systems of cardiac pacing. Use was made of ventricular pacing (VVI), atrial pacing (AAI), different modes of dual chamber pacing (VDD, DVI, DDD), and of rate responsive pacing (Activitrax, Sensolog, Meta-MV). Indications and contraindications for use of pacemakers of different types are discussed as are potential complications consequent on the use of different modes of cardiac pacing.