Mitral valve replacement combined with coronary artery operation: determinants of early and late results

Mitral valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass grafting has been reported as being associated with a higher mortality than either mitral valve replacement or coronary artery bypass grafting alone. Cause of mitral valve disease and severity of mitral regurgitation have been reported as related to mortality. To study the correlation of the cause of mitral valve disease and severity of mitral regurgitation to hospital mortality and long-term survival, we analyzed the results of 135 patients undergoing mitral valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting between June 1974 and August 1989. The hospital mortality was 11.8% (16/135). Fifteen preoperative and operative variables were tested for correlation with hospital or late mortality using univariate tests and multivariate regression. Advanced age (greater than 60 years), New York Heart Association functional class, and wall motion score were independently associated with hospital mortality (p less than 0.05). The cause of mitral valve disease and severity of mitral regurgitation were not related to hospital mortality or long-term survival (p greater than 0.05). The follow-up rate was 96.6% for the hospital survivors (115/119). Mean follow-up was 52.6 +/- 4.1 months. There were 35 late deaths. Survival was 91.9%, 89.9%, 78%, and 49.9% at 1, 2, 5, and 10 postoperative years, respectively. Preoperative New York Heart Association functional class and use of catecholamines during the postoperative intensive care period were independently related to late survival (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Improved early results after aortic valve replacement: analysis by surgical time frame

Primary aortic valve replacement was performed in 430 patients. It was an isolated procedure in 339 and was combined with coronary artery bypass grafting in 91. Of these patients, 282 underwent operation from 1970 through 1976 (time frame 1) and 148 from 1980 through 1985 (time frame 2). They were divided into subgroups by age, New York Heart Association functional class, combined coronary artery bypass graft, and valvular lesion. Overall hospital mortality was 7.7% (time frame 1 = 10.6% versus time frame 2 = 2.0%; p less than 0.01). Overall, functional class III or IV was the strongest predictor of hospital mortality (p less than 0.001). Association of coronary artery bypass graft was the next strongest predictor of hospital mortality (p less than 0.01), and it retained its predictive value in time frame 2. Overall, hospital mortality was higher in patients older than 55 years (10.5% versus 3.5%; p less than 0.05). There were no hospital deaths in patients younger than 55 years in time frame 2. Type of valvular lesion was not a predictor of hospital mortality. Hospital mortality in patients receiving cardioplegia was 2%. Cardioplegia use has lessened the effect of age and functional class as predictors of hospital mortality after primary aortic valve replacement. Earlier operation in time frame 2 played a substantial role in the overall improvement of early results.     

Postinfarct ventricular septal defect repair: effect of coronary artery bypass grafting.

Between June 1968 and April 1991, 75 patients who had undergone coronary angiography underwent repair of a postinfarction ventricular septal defect. Group 1 (n = 33) includes patients who had two- or three-vessel serious (> 75% narrowing) proximal coronary artery disease and underwent complete revascularization in addition to repair of the ventricular septal defect. Group 2 (n = 19) patients also had two- or three-vessel coronary artery disease but bypass grafting was not performed; only the ventricular defect was repaired. Group 3 (n = 23) patients had only single-vessel coronary artery disease that corresponded to the region of the infarct; they underwent ventricular septal defect repair only. Follow-up of hospital survivors was 96% complete at a mean of 86.2 months (range, 1 to 288 months). Hospital mortality after ventricular septal defect repair was 21.2% in the cohort with bypassed coronary artery disease (group 1), 26.3% in those with unbypassed disease (group 2), and 26.1% in those with only single-vessel coronary artery disease (group 3) (p = 0.88). With follow-up after 5 and 10 years, the actuarial survival was 72.2% +/- 8% and 47.8% +/- 10%, respectively, in the bypassed group, 29.2% +/- 11% and 0%, respectively, in the unbypassed group, and 52.2% +/- 10% and 36.5% +/- 11%, respectively, in the cohort with single-vessel disease. Bypassing associated coronary artery disease significantly increased long-term survival when compared with patients with unbypassed coronary artery disease (p = 0.0015).     

Myocardial revascularization with combined aortic and mitral valve replacements

Although the results of coronary artery bypass grafting plus single aortic or mitral valve replacement have been documented, the risk of myocardial revascularization with combined aortic and mitral valve replacement is not well defined. We present a series of 33 consecutive patients undergoing myocardial revascularization with combined aortic and mitral valve replacement during a period of almost seven years. There were 21 men and 12 women with a mean age of 67 years. All patients had congestive heart failure, and 21 (64%) had angina pectoris. Mean New York Heart Association functional classification was 3.4; eight patients (24%) had ejection fractions less than 0.40, and 13 patients (41%) had cardiac indices less than 2.0 L/min/m2. All operations were performed with hypothermic crystalloid potassium cardioplegia. The number of coronary arteries grafted varied from one to four (mean, 1.7 grafts per patient). Four patients died while in the hospital (12.1%). There were no perioperative myocardial infarctions. At a follow-up of 2 to 80 months (mean 40.7 months), death had occurred in eight (27.6%) of the 29 hospital survivors. Actuarial survival rate at 72 months was 60.7%. Although no preoperative factors predicted late death, early deaths were related significantly to severe mitral regurgitation, low ejection fraction, high New York Heart Association classification and extensive coronary artery disease (p less than 0.05). Myocardial revascularization with combined aortic and mitral valve replacement can be performed with an acceptable early mortality rate but with an appreciable late mortality rate.     

Ten-year survival following aortic valve replacement: A multivariate analysis of coronary bypass as a risk factor

The additional risk of coronary bypass surgery was analysed in 664 patients over 40 years of age undergoing aortic valve replacement between 1969 and 1981. Four hundred sixty-seven patients underwent aortic valve replacement alone, while 197 patients with coronary artery disease underwent combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery. There were no significant differences in the preoperative hemodynamic characteristics of the two groups of patients. There were 41 (9%) operative deaths following aortic valve replacement alone and 20 (10%) following aortic valve replacement with coronary bypass surgery. Since 1976, operative mortality has fallen to 5% and perioperative myocardial infarction to 2% following the combined procedure. Ten-year actuarial survival (standard error) was 56 (3%) following aortic valve replacement and 49 (6%) following aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery. A multivariate analysis including both groups of patients revealed that age, functional class and year of operation significantly affected ten-year survival (p less than 0.05). The same analysis showed that coronary artery disease requiring coronary bypass surgery also decreased ten year survival in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (p = 0.06).     

Mortality on the waiting list for coronary artery bypass grafting: incidence and risk factors

BACKGROUND: Insufficient capacity for coronary artery bypass grafting results in waiting times before operation, prioritization of patients and, ultimately, death on the waiting list. We aimed to calculate waiting list mortality and to identify risk factors for death on the waiting list. METHODS: The study included 5,864 consecutive patients accepted for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (78% male; mean age, 66 +/- 9 years). The patients were categorized at acceptance into three priority groups: imperative (39%), urgent (36%), or routine (25%). Waiting list mortality was calculated and compared between groups, and risk factors were identified by Poisson regression. RESULTS: Median waiting time for the whole population was 55 days. Seventy-seven patients (1.3%) died, corresponding to a mortality rate of 5.8 deaths per 100 patient-years. The mortality rate per 100 patient-years was highest for those in the imperative group, 15.1 deaths, compared with 5.3 deaths in the urgent group and 3.2 in the routine group (p < 0.001). Independent risk factors were male sex (p = 0.032), Cleveland Clinic risk score (p = 0.005), impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.007), unstable angina pectoris (p = 0.001), concomitant aortic valve disease (p = 0.002), priority group (p < 0.001), and time after acceptance (p = 0.019). The mortality risk increased with time after acceptance by 11% a month. CONCLUSIONS: Long waiting lists for coronary artery bypass grafting are associated with considerable mortality. The risk of death increases significantly with waiting time. Sex, unstable angina, perioperative risk, impaired left ventricular function, and concomitant aortic valve disease are independent risk factors and should be considered at triage.     

Early results of aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting

Early results of aortic valve replacement were reviewed in 962 unselected patients, 659 without concomitant coronary bypass surgery (AVR group) and 303 with combined valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting (AVR + CABG). The early (less than 30-day) mortality was 4.6% in the AVR, and 5.9% in the AVR + CABG group. Multivariate analysis showed coronary artery stenoses and NYHA functional class to be independent predictors of early mortality in the AVR group, and the number of distal anastomoses as the strongest predictor in AVR + CABG. The incidence of peroperative technical complications in the cases with fatal outcome was 27% in the AVR and 6% in the AVR + CABG group. The incidence of myocardial injury (new Q wave or evidence of increased enzyme leakage) was 11% in AVR and 21% in AVR + CABG. Independent predictors of postoperative myocardial injury were aortic cross-clamp time, year of surgery, coronary artery stenoses and NYHA class in AVR and aortic cross-clamp time and year of surgery in AVR + CABG. The study suggests that coronary artery disease increases risk in aortic valve replacement with or without CABG. Replacement should be undertaken before endstage of the disease (NYHA IV), with CABG if significant coronary disease is present, and in multivessel disease the number of distal anastomoses should be restricted in order to shorten aortic cross-clamp time.     

Aortic valve replacement and aorta-coronary bypass surgery. Results with perfusion of proximal and distal coronary arteries.

The results in 80 patients undergoing simultaneous aortic valve replacement and aorta-coronary saphenous vein bypass grafting were analyzed to assess the effect of operative technique. The over-all operative mortality rate of 6.3% (five of 80) did not differ significantly from our results with aortic valve replacement alone. All patients who had isolated aortic valve replacement were operated upon with moderate hypothermia. The combined operation was performed in two ways. Thirty-one patients had aortic valve replacement prior to bypass grafting with intermittent coronary ostila perfusion. There were two deaths (6.5%), and five myocardial infarctions (16.1%) were diagnosed by standard electrocardiographic and enzyme criteria. More recently, 49 patients have undergone bypass grafting prior to aortic valve replacement. The proximal ends of the grafts were either anastomosed high on the aortic root or else individually cannulated to provide continuous distal perfusion during subsequent aortic valve replacement, with continuous coronary ostial perfusion. There were three operative deaths (6.1%) and one myocardial infarction (2.0%). The risk of combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass need be no greater than the risk of aortic valve replacement alone. Our experience suggests that myocardial perfusion distal to significant coronary artery stenoses reduces the risk of myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery disease requiring aortic valve replacement.     

Propensity case-matched analysis of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with atheromatous aortic disease

OBJECTIVE: Atheromatous aortic disease is a risk factor for excessive mortality and stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with severe atheromatous aortic disease were compared by propensity case-match methods. METHODS: Routine intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography identified 985 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with severe atheromatous disease in the aortic arch or ascending aorta. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 281 patients (28.5%). Propensity matched-pairs analysis was used to match patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 245) with patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed decreased hospital mortality (16/245, 6.5% vs 28/245, 11.4%; P =.058) and stroke prevalence (4/245, 1.6% vs 14/245, 5.7%; P =.03) in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting compared with coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass. Freedom from any postoperative complication was higher in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting compared with coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (226/245, 92.2% vs 196/245, 80.0%; P <.001). Multivariable analysis of preoperative risk factors showed that increased hospital mortality was associated with coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (odds ratio = 2.7; P =.01), fewer grafts (P =.05), acute myocardial infarction (odds ratio = 11.5; P <.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio = 2.4; P =.03), previous cardiac surgery (odds ratio = 10.2, P =.05), and peripheral vascular disease (odds ratio = 2.1; P =.05). Cardiopulmonary bypass was the only independent risk factor for stroke (odds ratio = 3.6, P =.03). At 36 months' follow-up, comparable survival was observed in the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass groups (74% vs 72%). Multivariable analysis revealed that renal disease (P <.001), advanced age (P <.001), previous myocardial infarction (P =.03), and lower number of grafts (P =.02) were independent risks for late mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe atherosclerotic aortic disease who undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting have a significantly lower prevalence of hospital mortality, perioperative stroke, and overall complications than matched patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass. Routine intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography identifies severe atheromatous aortic disease and directs the choice of surgical technique.     

Current determinants of operative mortality in 1400 patients requiring aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND: Determinants of operative mortality after aortic valve replacement vary with a changing patient population due to advances in operative management and increasing life expectancy. In order to predict current groups of high risk patients, a statistically valid large study population base recruited over a short period of time is required. METHODS: Between January 1996 and June 2001, 1408 aortic valves were replaced in 1400 patients (572 of them with simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting). The data were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the operative risk. Mean age of the study population was 68 +/- 11 years (range 19 to 90 years old, 44% female). RESULTS: Overall operative mortality (within 30 days) was 3.8%. Independent predictive factors for operative mortality were previous bypass surgery, emergency operation, simultaneous mitral valve replacement, renal dysfunction, more than 80 years old, simultaneous bypass surgery in female patients with a body mass index greater than 29 kg/m(2), and height smaller than 1.57 m for patients more than 71 years old. Simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting in general (p = 0.6), previous aortic valve replacement (p = 0.59), and implantation of stented bioprostheses (p = 0.39) or stentless bioprostheses (p = 0.7) were not identified as independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Certain groups of patients with a high operative risk were identified: patients more than 80 years old, women with a body mass index greater 29 kg/m(2) undergoing simultaneous coronary artery bypass surgery, and "small" patients more than 71 years old.     

Aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: Whether minimally diseased aortic valves should be replaced during other necessary cardiac operations remains controversial. Part of the decision-making process in that issue revolves around the risks of subsequent aortic valve replacement. This study evaluated the results of aortic valve replacement in patients following prior cardiac surgery. METHODS: From February, 1984 through December, 2001 first-time aortic valve replacement was performed in 132 consecutive patients who had previous cardiac surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass. Of those patients 89 (67%) had aortic valve replacement at a mean of 8.3 years after prior coronary artery bypass grafting, and 43 (33%) had aortic valve replacement at a mean of 13.0 years after previous procedures other than myocardial revascularization. Hospital records of all patients were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Early complications included operative mortality in six (6.7%) of the patients with prior coronary grafting and no mortality in the group with other prior operations. Patients having prior coronary grafting had more nonfatal complications than those with other previous procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve replacement in patients following previous cardiac surgery can be accomplished with acceptable mortality and morbidity. Routine replacement of aortic valves that are minimally diseased during coronary artery bypass grafting may not be warranted.     

Combining off pump coronary artery bypass with mitral valve replacement

Background Conventional approach to combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) is associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross clamp (ACC) time leading to high operative risk. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of nine consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve replacement combining the off pump technique with cardioplegic arrest. Elective intra aortic balloon pump (IABP) support was instituted in all cases. CABG was first done in all cases without cardiopulmonary bypass support. Mitral valve replacement was then done using conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest using the superior septal approach. Results Nine consecutive patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with mitral valve replacement including three patients with acute myocardial infarction. Preoperative echocardiogram revealed a mean ejection fraction (EF) of 38.4 ± 6.0%. Intra aortic balloon pump was inserted in all patients preoperatively. The average number of grafts were 3.0 ± 0.7. Eight patients received bioprosthetic valve while one patient received mechanical prosthesis. The average length of stay in intensive care unit was 3.3 ± 0.5 days. There was no mortality. One patient had superficial wound infection. Conclusion The data suggest that the combined technique (off pump coronary artery bypass grafting and conventional mitral valve replacement) is a safe method to perform coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve replacement with minimal morbidity and mortality.     

Aortic valve replacement in patients with impaired ventricular function

BACKGROUND: Patients with reduced ventricular function undergoing aortic valve replacement have increased operative risks, but the impact of valvular pathophysiology and other risk factors has not been clearly defined. METHODS: From June 1992 through June 2002, 1,402 consecutive patients underwent isolated aortic valve surgery with or without coronary artery bypass grafting; of these patients, 416 had an ejection fraction less than 40% and are the subject of this report. These patients (mean age, 68.6) had severe stenosis (62.5%), severe regurgitation (30.3%), or mixed disease (7.2%). Aortic valve replacement plus coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 48.4% of patients, and 27% had previous cardiac surgery. Follow-up included echocardiography and survival analysis. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 10.1% (42 of 416), with no difference between aortic stenosis (9.6%) and regurgitation (11.1%). Multivariate analysis revealed that age (p = 0.002) and renal disease (odds ratio = 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 9.3; p = 0.001) were independently associated predictors of mortality. Valvular pathophysiology had no impact on mortality. Peripheral vascular disease, multivessel coronary disease, and renal disease were associated risks for any postoperative complication. Peripheral vascular disease (odds ratio = 12.3, p = 0.02), history of cerebrovascular disease (odds ratio = 4.8, p = 0.038), and diabetes (odds ratio = 2.7, p = 0.04) were associated risks for stroke. The ejection fraction was more than 40% in 52% of the patients who had postoperative echocardiography (mean follow-up, 6 months). Actuarial survival revealed no difference between pathophysiologic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve surgery in patients with impaired ventricular function carries an acceptable operative risk that can be stratified by age and comorbidities. The type of valvular pathophysiology does not significantly affect mortality.     

Surgical results for mitral regurgitation from coronary artery disease

Results of coronary artery bypass grafting with and without mitral valve replacement were analyzed retrospectively in 101 patients with preoperative ischemic mitral regurgitation to determine the effects of severity and surgical treatment of mitral regurgitation on survival. Between 1980 and 1984, a total of 1,475 patients (mean age 59, 77% male) underwent coronary bypass. These patients were divided into three groups: (1) patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent isolated coronary bypass (1,374; 93%), (2) patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent isolated coronary bypass without valve replacement (85; 6%), and (3) patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent combined mitral valve replacement and coronary bypass (16; 1%). Preoperatively, patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation compared to those without regurgitation were significantly older (+6 years, p less than 0.001), had more severe coronary artery disease (p less than 0.001), a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (24% versus 5%, p less than 0.001) and recent myocardial infarction (16% versus 8%, p less than 0.01), and a lower mean ejection fraction (45% versus 61%, p less than 0.001). Operative mortality was significantly increased in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent coronary bypass alone (p less than 0.01) and in those who underwent coronary bypass and mitral valve replacement (p less than 0.01)--11% and 19%, respectively--than in the coronary bypass patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation (3.7%). The severity of mitral regurgitation (0 to 4+) proved to be the most significant predictor of operative mortality. The actuarial survival rate at 5 years for the coronary bypass patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation was 85% compared to 91% (p less than 0.05) for the coronary bypass patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation. These results indicate that patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation have a higher prevalence of cardiac risk factors and are at an increased risk of operative mortality. Although the severity of the ischemic mitral regurgitation was strongly predictive of early survival, it proved to have an unexpectedly modest effect on long-term survival after surgical treatment.     

Hospital death on a cardiac surgical service: negative influence of changing practice patterns

From January 1982 through December 1985, 3,772 patients underwent a cardiac surgical procedure for coronary or acquired heart disease. Operative mortality increased from 4% in 1982 to 7% in 1985 (p less than 0.001 by chi 2 analysis). There was an increase over time of patients older than 70 years (p less than 0.001). Female patients increased from 31% in 1982 to 35% in 1985 (p less than 0.001). The percentage of patients having isolated coronary artery bypass grafting decreased from 69% in 1983 to 60% in 1985 (p less than 0.001), and hospital mortality after this procedure increased (p = 0.058). Patients requiring more complex procedures including multiple-valve operations or combined valve replacement or repair plus bypass grafting increased from 1982 through 1985 (p = 0.005). Reoperations for multiple-valve procedures or combined valve repair or replacement plus coronary artery bypass grafting also increased (p = 0.02), particularly for patients more than 70 years of age (p less than 0.001). Changing practice patterns have had a negative impact on surgical results. This evolution in cardiac surgical practice has important implications related to peer review and quality-assurance screening, diagnosis-related group reimbursement, and reporting of surgical outcomes to governmental agencies.     

Aortic valve replacement with coronary bypass grafting. Significant determinants of ten-year survival

Concomitant aortic valve replacement (AVR) and myocardial revascularization were performed on 197 patients between 1969 and 1981. Operative mortality during the period 1969 to 1975 was 15.6% compared to 5.0% for the years 1976 to 1981 (p less than 0.02). The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI) declined over the same period from 14.2% to 2.0% (p less than .01). Functional class and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure significantly influenced mortality, whereas age, sex, duration of symptoms, cardiac index, wall motion abnormality, type of valve lesion, and completeness of revascularization did not. Type of myocardial preservation did not significantly affect operative mortality, although a trend favoring either cardioplegia or continuous perfusion of both coronary ostia and grafts was observed. Life-table analysis shows a survival rate during the 10 year follow-up period equal to that of patients undergoing isolated AVR. Cornary bypass grafting (CABG) returns patients with combined aortic valve (AVD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) to a prognostic curve determined by their valvular disease alone.     

The impact of selective use of dipyridamole-thallium scans and surgical factors on the current morbidity of aortic surgery.

Preoperative cardiac testing in patients undergoing vascular surgery remains controversial. We have advocated selective use of dipyridamole-thallium scans based on clinical markers of coronary artery disease before aortic surgery. The present study assessed both the efficacy of this policy and the role of surgical factors in the current morbidity of aortic reconstruction. Two hundred two elective aortic reconstructions (151 abdominal aortic aneurysms, 51 aortoiliac occlusive disease) performed in the period from January 1989 to June 1990 were reviewed. Preoperative dipyridamole-thallium scanning was performed in 29% of all patients, prompting coronary angiograms in 11% and coronary artery bypass grafting/percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 9% of patients before aortic reconstruction. The overall operative mortality rate was 2%, with one cardiac-related death. Major cardiac (nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina) and pulmonary complications occurred in an additional 4% and 6%, respectively, of patients. Coronary artery disease clinical markers and surgical factors were analyzed with stepwise logistic regression for the prediction of operative mortality rates and major cardiopulmonary complications. Variables retaining significance in predicting postoperative death or cardiopulmonary complications included prolonged (more than 5-hour) operative time (p less than 0.004), operation for aortoiliac occlusive disease (p less than 0.010), and a history of ventricular ectopy (p less than 0.002). Prolonged operative time (p less than 0.006) and the detection of intraoperative myocardial ischemia (p less than 0.030) were predictive of major cardiac complications after univariate analysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting. Long-term results

In 83 patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting, 92 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty attempts were done, 33 in a venous bypass graft (success rate 97%) and 59 in a native coronary artery (success rate 86.4%). There were no procedural-related deaths and two myocardial infarctions. Forty-six percent of the patients with successful angioplasty after previous bypass grafting remain symptom free after 5 years versus 79% of the patients without previous bypass grafting (p less than 0.001). Long-term success rates for native vessel angioplasty as compared with bypass graft angioplasty are similar. Patients with a short interval between the recurrence of angina after bypass grafting and the angioplasty attempt have a better chance of long-term success. Repeat angiography indicates that a restenosis occurs after angioplasty of a venous graft in 31% and in the native system in 28.6% and that signs of progression of coronary artery disease elsewhere are present in 30%. Of the 83 patients, 11 had reoperation eventually. We conclude that percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty after coronary bypass grafting gives less satisfactory results than a primary procedure, that angioplasty provides symptomatic relief in a smaller number of patients than in those with primary angioplasty, but that symptomatic relief is often sufficient to further postpone or prevent bypass grafting and can be achieved with low mortality and low complication rates.     

Aortic root replacement with composite valve graft

BACKGROUND: Composite valve graft replacement is currently the treatment of choice for a wide variety of lesions of the aortic root and the ascending aorta. In this study we report our experience with aortic root replacement using a composite graft. METHODS: Between October 1978 and May 2001, 274 patients (79.6% male and 20.4% female) with a mean age of 53.5 years underwent composite graft replacement of the aortic root. One hundred sixty-one patients (70.8%) had annuloaortic ectasia and 46 (16.8%) aortic dissection. The classic Bentall technique was used in 94 patients (34.3%), the "button technique" in 172 patients (62.8%), and the Cabrol technique in 8 patients (2.9%). RESULTS: The early mortality rate was 6.9% (19 of 274 patients). Cardiopulmonary bypass time longer than 180 minutes and associated coronary artery bypass grafting were found to be independent risk factors of early mortality. The actuarial survival rate was 77.7% at 5 years and 63% at 10 years. The independent risk factors for late mortality were coronary artery disease, chronic renal failure, and postoperative dialysis. The actuarial freedom from reoperation on the remaining aorta was higher among patients without Marfan syndrome (94.6% versus 79.6% at 10 years, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Composite valve graft replacement can be performed with low hospital mortality and morbidity. The button technique offers some advantages and should be used whenever possible. In case of acute aortic dissection root replacement is usually not necessary. Marfan patients should be treated with early root replacement before dissection occurs.     

Extended total arch replacement for acute type a aortic dissection: experience with seventy patients

OBJECTIVE: We sought to report the clinical experience with extended total arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection and to determine the factors that influence early mortality, late survival, and late reoperation. METHODS: Between December 1988 and August 1998, 70 patients underwent emergency graft replacement of both the ascending aorta and the total aortic arch for acute type A aortic dissection. All operations were performed with hypothermic extracorporeal circulation, selective cerebral perfusion for cerebral protection during aortic arch repair, and open distal anastomosis. Concomitant procedures included aortic valve resuspension in 18 patients, composite graft replacement in 10 patients, and coronary artery bypass grafting in 5 patients. RESULTS: The early mortality rate was 16% (11 of 70 patients). Multivariable analysis showed that renal-mesenteric ischemia and coronary artery bypass grafting were independent determinants for early death. Survival rates at 3 and 5 years postoperatively, including the early deaths, were 75% +/- 5% and 73% +/- 6%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that renal-mesenteric ischemia and en bloc repair were independent determinants for late death. Freedom from reoperation was 91% +/- 4% and 77% +/- 8% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that anastomotic leakage was the only significant determinant for late reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Extended total arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection could be justified in properly selected patients.