Is cervical lordosis relevant in laminoplasty?

Background contextLaminoplasty aims to decompress the spinal cord and stabilize the cervical spine in patients with multilevel cervical lesions. Not every patient with cervical compressive myelopathy is a good candidate for laminoplasty. Most studies recommend that neutral or kyphotic alignments are contraindications for laminoplasty. However, cervical sagittal alignment does not have a strong and consistent effect on the clinical outcomes of laminoplasty. Moreover, many reports on the effect of cervical sagittal alignment did not designate the ideal definition of alignment and used different definitions of lordosis.PurposeTo identify the effect of preoperative cervical alignment according to two different definitions after midline splitting double-door laminoplasty.Study designRetrospective cohort study.Patient sampleFrom August 2008 to September 2010, 58 patients were diagnosed with cervical myelopathy and treated with midline splitting double-door laminoplasty.Outcome measuresThe clinical results were assessed with the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) and were compared to analyze the rate of change between preoperative and postoperative values. Postoperative radiological results at the final follow-up examinations were compared between groups to obtain the change in range of motion and sagittal alignment.MethodThe effect of cervical alignment on JOA, NDI, and VAS scales and also on change of alignment and change of range of motion (ROM) at the final follow-up examinations was analyzed statistically between two groups according to two different definitions such as Toyama classification and Cobb angle.ResultsNo difference was found between the two groups according to Toyama classification in terms of the postoperative improvement rate of the modified JOA score (p=.086), decreasing rate of the VAS (p=.940) or NDI (p=.211), postoperatively. Additionally, no difference was found for the decreasing rate of ROM (p=.427) or sagittal alignment (p=.864) based on the radiological evaluation results. Also, there was no difference between two groups according to Cobb angle in terms of the modified JOA score (p=.743), VAS (p=.548), or NDI (p=.32), postoperatively. Additionally, no difference was found for the ROM (p=1.000) or sagittal alignment (p=.440) based on the radiological evaluation results.ConclusionsDespite nonlordosis cervical sagittal alignment, double-door laminoplasty would be effective for patients with cervical myelopathy because of cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Furthermore, sagittal alignment is not the absolute and sole factor that surgeons should consider when determining the optimal treatment strategy.     

Kinematics after cervical laminoplasty: risk factors for cervical kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty

BACKGROUND CONTEXTLaminoplasty of the cervical spine is widely used as an effective surgical method to treat compressive myelopathy of the cervical spine; however, there is an adverse effect of kyphosis after surgery. The risk factors or predictors of kyphosis have not been sufficiently evaluated.PURPOSETo assess the risk factors for kyphosis following laminoplasty.STUDY DESIGNRetrospective study.PATIENT SAMPLEPatients diagnosed with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) who underwent laminoplasty between May 2011 and October 2018 were enrolled.OUTCOME MEASURESChanges in lordosis and range of motion (ROM).METHODSRadiological imaging data were collected from simple neutral and flexion-extension radiographs at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. The ROM from the neutral position to complete flexion was defined as the flexion capacity, and the ROM from the neutral position to complete extension was defined as the extension capacity.RESULTSThis study included 53 patients (mean age, 59.3 years). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that, the smaller the preoperative extension capacity, the greater was the decrease in lordosis (p=.025), while the larger the T1 slope, the greater was the decrease in lordosis following laminoplasty (p= .008). Correlation analysis revealed that C2-7 lordosis increased with increasing baseline T1 slope before surgery (p< .01). In patients with large preoperative C2-7 lordosis, the postoperative decrease in ROM tended to be greater (p= .028). However, the degree of lordosis and ROM reduction did not demonstrate a clear correlation with the clinical outcomes at 2 years after surgery.CONCLUSIONSKyphotic changes in the cervical spine following laminoplasty were related to preoperative radiological parameters. The greater the preoperative extension capacity, the lower was the decrease in lordosis, and the greater the T1 slope, the greater was the decrease in lordosis.     

Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis

Background contextCervical arthroplasty theoretically reduces the risk of adjacent level disc degeneration and segmental instability that may be seen after a cervical fusion. An essential argument in confirming the utility of cervical arthroplasty is long-term confirmation that cervical disc replacements can maintain physiological kinematics at the index and adjacent levels.PurposeThe purpose of this in vivo prospective study was to characterize the long-term segmental kinematic outcomes after cervical arthroplasty.Study design/settingProspective cohort study.Patient sampleTwenty patients with a 5-year clinical follow-up who underwent anterior cervical discectomy with insertion of the Bryan cervical disc.Outcome measuresPhysiological measures (kinematic analysis of lateral neutral, flexion, and extension radiographic imaging).MethodsTwenty consecutive patients with degenerative disc disease were followed with regular radiographic imaging after implantation of the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Lateral neutral, flexion, and extension radiographs (n=240) were analyzed using Quantitative Motion Analysis software (Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, TX, USA) to measure the biomechanical profile at the index level and adjacent levels up to 5 years after surgery. Parameters collected included range of motion (ROM), functional spinal unit (FSU) angle, anterior and posterior disc heights, sagittal translation, and center of rotation (COR).ResultsBiomechanics of the implanted artificial cervical disc was maintained up to 5 years with no significant changes in ROM, FSU angle, disc height, sagittal translation, and COR values when compared with early postoperative performance. Artificial discs were able to adequately restore and maintain preoperative kinematics. Early differences seen in disc height and FSU angle did not change during the duration of follow-up. No significant kyphotic changes or decrease in ROM were seen at the adjacent spinal levels.ConclusionsThe Bryan cervical disc prosthesis provides for a durable solution for functional spinal motion at the operated level and maintained the preoperative kinematics at adjacent levels at the 5-year follow-up.     

Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty

Background contextCervical artificial disc replacement is increasingly becoming popular among spine surgeons. Cervical disc arthroplasty aims to afford spinal stability and then balance this with flexibility. One of the fundamental benefits from performing cervical arthroplasty instead of fusion is preservation of motion in both the functional spinal unit (FSU) and the overall cervical spine. Eventually, preservation of segmental motion is believed to prevent the development of adjacent segment degeneration. But to justify its use, disc replacement prosthesis must demonstrate actual motion in vivo and preserve range of motion (ROM) after surgery as long as it allows. Without preservation of motion, disc prosthesis becomes just a functional arthrodesis equivalent.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to analyze the possible factors affecting cervical spine ROM after single-level cervical disc arthroplasty.Study design/settingThis is a retrospective radiological study of patients with symptomatic single-level cervical disc disorder who received the cervical disc prosthesis (Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis; Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN, USA).Patient sampleProcedure was performed in 39 patients.Outcome measuresThe outcome measures were statistical correlation of possible factors and ROM.MethodsWe investigated possible factors that could affect cervical ROM after surgical intervention using cervical disc replacement. For this, we focused on two main components, namely, patient factors and technical factors. First, we examined patient factors, such as age, sex, preoperative FSU ROM, and preoperative overall cervical spine (whole cervical spine) ROM. Second, we then investigated technical factors, such as the amount of bone resection, disc insertion angle, and disc insertion depth. Then, our study searched if there was any statistical correlation between these factors and the postoperative cervical ROM.ResultsSignificant correlation was found between the postoperative overall cervical spine ROM and preoperative overall cervical spine ROM (p<.0001, R²=0.9062). Postoperative FSU ROM is closely correlated to both the preoperative FSU ROM (p<.0001) and the disc insertion angle (p=.0097). However, no significant correlation was noted between age, sex, disc insertion angle, and disc insertion depth.ConclusionSignificant correlation was found between the postoperative overall cervical spine ROM and preoperative overall cervical spine ROM. Postoperative FSU ROM is closely correlated to both the preoperative FSU ROM and the disc insertion angle. Careful preoperative evaluation of the patient's radiographs and meticulous surgical technique during the surgical procedure could aid in achieving the goals and benefits of cervical disc arthroplasty.     

Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION: Disc arthroplasty has been shown to provide short-term clinical results that are comparable with those attained with traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. One proposed benefit of arthroplasty is the ability to prevent or delay adjacent level operations by retaining motion at the target level and eliminating abnormal adjacent activity. This paper compares motion parameters for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc replacement patients at the index level and adjacent segments. METHODS: Radiographic data from patients enrolled in a prospective, randomized clinical trial were selected for kinematic assessment of cervical motion. All patients received either a single-level fusion with allograft and anterior cervical plate (Atlantis anterior cervical plate, n=13) or a single-level artificial cervical disc (Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis, n=9) at either C5/C6 or C6/C7. Flexion, extension, and neutral lateral radiographs were obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at regular intervals up to 24-month time points. Cervical vertebral bodies were tracked on the digital radiographs using quantitative motion analysis software (QMA, Medical Metrics) to calculate the functional spinal unit motion parameters including range of motion (ROM), translation, and center of rotation. If visible, the functional spinal unit parameters were obtained at the operative level, and also the level above and the level below. RESULTS: As expected, significantly (P<0.006 at 3, 6, 12, and 24 mo) more flexion/extension motion was retained in the disc replacement group than the plated group at the index level. The disc replacement group retained an average of 6.7 degrees at 24 months. In contrast, the average ROM in the fusion group was 2.0 degrees at the 3-month follow-up and gradually decreased to 0.6 degrees at 24 months. The flexion/extension ROM both above and below the operative level was not statistically different for the disc-replaced and fusion patients, however, mobility increased for both groups over time. The anterior/posterior translation that occurs with flexion/extension motion remained unchanged for the disc replacement group at the level above the target disc preoperatively and postoperatively. In contrast, the translation increased for the level above the fusion. At the 6-month follow-up, the increase in translation was significantly greater for patients that were fused (P<0.02) than for patients that received a disc replacement. This change was not significant at 12 months. DISCUSSION: Previous studies have shown the Bryan disc to maintain mobility at the level of the prosthesis. The long-term clinical benefit of maintenance of motion is postulated to be the ability to delay or avoid adjacent level operations. This study reveals that there is no difference in flexion/extension ROM at the level above and below either a fusion or Bryan arthroplasty. There is, however, an increase in anterior/posterior translation at the cephalad adjacent level in patients with arthrodesis while the Bryan arthroplasty retains normal translation for the same amount of flexion/extension at the adjacent level. CONCLUSION: The Bryan disc may delay adjacent level degeneration by preserving preoperative kinematics at adjacent levels.     

In vitro evaluation of stiffness and load sharing in a two-level corpectomy: comparison of static and dynamic cervical plates

Background contextAnterior cervical plating has been accepted in corpectomy and fusion of the cervical spine. Constrained plates were criticized for stress shielding that may lead to subsidence and pseudarthrosis. A dynamic plate allows load sharing as the graft subsides. Ideally, the dynamic plate design should maintain adequate stiffness of the construct while providing a reasonable load sharing with the strut graft.PurposeThe purpose of the study was to compare dynamic and static plate kinematics with graft subsidence.Study design/settingThe study designed was an in vitro biomechanical study in a porcine cervical spine model.MethodsTwelve spines were initially tested in intact condition with 20-N axial load in 15 degrees of flexion and extension range of motion (ROM). Then, a two-level corpectomy was created in all specimens with spines randomized to receive either a static or dynamic plate. The spines were retested under identical conditions with optimal length and undersized graft. Range of motion and graft loading were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (p<.05).ResultsBoth plates significantly limited ROM compared with the intact spine in both graft length conditions. In extension graft, load was significantly higher (p=.001) in the static plate with optimal length, and in flexion, there was a significant loss of graft load (p=.0004). In flexion, the dynamic plate with undersized graft demonstrated significantly more load sustained (p=.0004).ConclusionsBoth plates reasonably limited the ROM of the corpectomy. The static plate had significantly higher graft loads in extension and significant loss of graft load in flexion, whereas the dynamic plate maintained a reasonable graft load in ROM even when graft contact was imperfect.     

Sagittal range of motion after extensive cervical fusion

Background contextComplicated cervical spine revision and deformity correction surgeries are becoming increasingly common. These challenging operations often necessitate fusion of the entire cervical spine. Patients frequently express concern over the likely loss of range of motion (ROM) of the neck postoperatively. However, we are aware of no study that specifically examines the sagittal cervical ROM after extensive cervical fusion.PurposeTo characterize sagittal ROM after extensive cervical fusion.Study designRetrospective case series.Patient sampleThirty patients were included.Outcome measuresRadiographs at final follow-up were measured for cervical ROM by the occipitocervical and cervicosternal angles with the neck in full flexion and extension.MethodsThe surgical and medical records at one tertiary referral academic institution were used to identify adults who had undergone extensive cervical fusion between 1996 and 2008. An “extensive cervical fusion” entailed an upper instrumented vertebra proximal to C3 and lower instrumented vertebra distal to C7. Radiographs at final follow-up were measured for cervical ROM by the occipitocervical and cervicosternal angles with the neck in full flexion and extension.ResultsThe average age at surgery was 58.3±10.0 years. The surgical levels were occiput–T1 (one patient), occiput–T4 (one patient), occiput–T6 (one patient), C1–T1 (one patient), C1–T2 (one patient), C2–T1 (nine patients), C2–T2 (eight patients), C2–T3 (six patients), and C2–T4 (two patients). Twenty-seven of the procedures were revisions. The other surgical indications were chin-on-chest deformity (one patient), cervical scoliosis (one patient), and multilevel cervical myelopathy (one patient). The mean follow-up period was 34.5±30.9 months (range, 6–154 months). The mean cervical ROM values by the occipitocervical and cervicosternal angles were 29.5±11.0° and 7.5±5.0°, respectively. The mean total cervical ROM value was 34.1±14.7°.ConclusionsA substantial degree of sagittal ROM can be maintained after extensive surgical fusion of the cervical spine.     

Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion

Background contextThe cervical disc arthroplasty has emerged as a promising alternative to the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with radiculopathy or myelopathy with disc degeneration disease. The advantages of this technique have been reported to preserve the cervical mobility and possibly reduce the adjacent segment degeneration. However, no studies have compared the clinical outcomes and radiological results in patients treated with Discover artificial disc replacement to those observed in matched group of patients that have undergone ACDF.PurposeWe conducted this clinical study to compare the cervical kinematics and radiographic adjacent-level changes after Discover artificial disc replacement with ACDF.Study designAnalysis and evaluation of data acquired in a comparative clinical study.Patient sampleThe number of patients in the Discover and ACDF group were 149 and 196, respectively.Outcome measuresThe Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were evaluated. The range of movement (ROM) by the shell angle, the functional segment unit and global angles were measured, and the postoperative radiological changes at adjacents levels were observed.MethodsA total of 149 patients with symptomatic single or two-level cervical degenerative diseases received the Discover cervical artificial disc replacement from November 2008 to February 2010. During the same period, there were a total of 196 patients undergoing one or two-level ACDF. The average follow-up periods of the Discover disc group and ACDF group were 22.1 months and 22.5 months, respectively. Before surgery, patients were evaluated using static and dynamic cervical spine radiographs in addition to computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Static and dynamic cervical spine radiographs were obtained after surgery and then at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Then, the subsequent follow-up examinations were performed at every 6-month interval. The clinical results in terms of NDI and VAS scores, the parameters of cervical kinematics, postoperative radiological changes at adjacent levels, and complications in the two groups were statistically analyzed and compared. No funding was received for this study, and the authors report no potential conflict of interest–associated biases in the text.ResultsAlthough the clinical improvements in terms of NDI and VAS scores were achieved in both the Discover and ACDF group, no significant difference was found between the two groups for both single- (VAS p=.13, NDI p=.49) and double-level surgeries (VAS p=.28, NDI p=.21). Significant differences of cervcial kinematics occurred between the Discover and the ACDF group for both the single- and double-level surgeries at the operative segments (p<.001). Except the upper adjacent levels for the single-level Discover and ACDF groups (p=.33), significant increases in adjacent segment motion were observed in the ACDF group compared with the minimal ROM changes in adjacent segment motion noted in the Discover group, and the differences between the two groups for both single and double-level procedures were statistically significant (p<.05). There were significant differences in the postoperative radiological changes at adjacent levels between the Discover and ACDF groups for the single-level surgery (p<.001, χ²=18.18) and the double-level surgery (p=.007, χ²=7.2). No significant difference of complications was found between the Discover and ACDF groups in both single (p=.25, χ²=1.32) and double-level cases (p=.4, χ²=0.69).ConclusionsThe adjacent segment ROM and the incidence of radiographic adjacent-level changes in patients undergoing ACDF were higher than those undergoing Discover artificial disc replacement. The cervical mobility was relatively well maintained in the Discover group compared with the ACDF group, and the Discover cervical disc arthroplasty can be an effective alternative to the fusion technique.     

Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement

Background contextCervical total disc replacement (TDR) is an emerging technology. However, the factors that influence postoperative range of motion (ROM) and patient satisfaction are not fully understood.PurposeTo evaluate the influence of pre- and postoperative disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes.Study design/settingRetrospective review of patients enrolled in prospective randomized Food and Drug Administration (FDA) trial.Patient sampleOne hundred sixty-six patients with single-level ProDisc-C arthroplasty performed were evaluated.Outcome measuresROM and clinical outcomes based on Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were assessed.MethodsPreoperative and postoperative disc height and ROM were measured from lateral and flexion-extension radiographs. Student t test and Spearman's rho tests were performed to determine any correlation or “threshold” effect between the disc height and ROM or clinical outcome.ResultsPatients with less than 4 mm of preoperative disc height had a mean 1.8° increase in flexion-extension ROM after TDR, whereas patients with greater than 4 mm of preoperative disc height had no change (mean, 0°) in flexion-extension ROM (p=.04). Patients with greater than 5 mm of postoperative disc height have significantly higher postoperative flexion-extension ROM (mean, 10.1°) than those with less than 5 mm disc height (mean, 8.3°, p=.014). However, patients with greater than 7 mm of postoperative disc height have significantly lower postoperative lateral bending ROM (mean, 4.1°) than those with less than 7 mm disc height (mean, 5.7°, p=.04). It appears that the optimal postoperative disc height is between 5 and 7 mm for increased ROM on flexion extension and lateral bending. There was a mean improvement of 30.5 points for NDI, 4.3 points for VAS neck pain score, and 3.9 points for VAS arm pain score (all p<.001). No correlation could be found between clinical outcomes and disc height. Similarly, no threshold effect could be found between any specific disc height and NDI or VAS.ConclusionPatients with greater disc collapse of less than 4 mm preoperative disc height benefit more in ROM after TDR. The optimal postoperative disc height range to maximize ROM is between 5 and 7 mm. This optimal range did not translate into better clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up.     

In vivo analysis of cervical kinematics after implantation of a minimally constrained cervical artificial disc replacement

Introduction

To better understand cervical kinematics following cervical disc replacement (CDR), the in vivo behavior of a minimally constrained CDR was assessed.

Methods

Radiographic analysis of 19 patients undergoing a 1-level CDR from C4–5 to C6–7 (DISCOVER, Depuy-Spine, USA) was performed. Neutral–lateral and flexion–extension radiographs obtained at preop, postop and late follow-up were analyzed for segmental angle and global angle (GA C2–7). Flexion–extension range of motion was analyzed using validated quantitative motion analysis software (QMA®, Medical Metrics, USA). The FSU motion parameters measured at the index and adjacent levels were angular range of motion (ROM), translation and center of rotation (COR). Translation and COR were normalized to the AP dimension of the inferior endplate of the caudal vertebra. All motion parameters, including COR, were compared with normative reference data.

Results

The average patient age was 43.5 ± 7.3 years. The mean follow-up was 15.3 ± 7.2 months. C2–7 ROM was 35.9° ± 15.7° at preop and 45.4° ± 13.6° at follow-up (?p < .01). Based on the QMA at follow-up, angular ROM at the CDR level measured 9.8° ± 5.9° and translation was 10.1 ± 7.8 %. Individuals with higher ROM at the CDR level had increased translation at that level (p < .001, r = 0.97), increased translation and ROM at the supra-adjacent level (p < .001, r = .8; p = .005, r = .6). There was a strong interrelation between angular ROM and translation at the supra-adjacent level (p < .001, r = .9) and caudal-adjacent level (p < .001, r = .9). The location of the COR at the CDR- and supra-adjacent levels was significantly different for the COR-X (p < .001). Notably, the COR-Y at the CDR level was significantly correlated with the extent of CDR-level translation (p = .02, r = .6). Shell angle, which may be influenced by implant size and positioning had no impact on angular ROM but was correlated with COR-X (p = .05, r = ?.6) and COR-Y (p = .04, r = ?.5).

Conclusion

The COR is an important parameter for assessing the ability of non-constrained CDRs to replicate the normal kinematics of a FSU. CDR size and location, both of which can impact shell angle, may influence the amount of translation by affecting the location of the COR. Future research is needed to show how much translation is beneficial concerning clinical outcomes and facet loading.     

Cervical alignment and range of motion after laminoplasty: radiographical data from more than 500 cases with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and a review of the literature

STUDY DESIGN.: A large-scale analysis of radiographical results of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and a review of the literature. OBJECTIVE.: To identify changes in sagittal alignment and range of motion (ROM) after cervical laminoplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Cervical laminoplasty is an effective procedure for decompressing multilevel spinal cord compression. It often induces postoperative complications such as loss of lordotic alignment and restriction of neck motion. Although numerous studies have reported the loss of flexion-extension ROM after laminoplasty, no large-scale study has been reported. METHODS.: Five hundred twenty consecutive patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (331 male and 189 female; mean age, 62.2 yr) who underwent modified double-door laminoplasty were enrolled. The average follow-up period was 33.3 months. All patients were allowed to sit up and walk on the first postoperative day using an orthosis, which could be removed within the first 2 weeks, even if long. Early cervical ROM exercises were performed as a part of the rehabilitation schedule. Radiography was performed before surgery and at the final follow-up. Cervical alignment in the neutral and flexion-extension view were measured by the Cobb method at C2-C7. The ROM was assessed by measuring the difference in alignment between flexion and extension. RESULTS.: The mean C2-C7 alignment in the neutral position was 11.9° lordotic preoperatively and 13.6° lordotic postoperatively; the alignment increased by 1.8° in lordosis. The mean total ROM decreased from a preoperative value of 40.1° to 33.5° at the final follow-up, showing a significant difference of 6.6°. The mean total ROM preservation after laminoplasty was 87.9%. CONCLUSION.: Sagittal alignment was slightly changed, with only a 1.8° increase in lordosis. The ROM of the cervical spine was preserved by 87.9%. This preservation of alignment and ROM might be attributable to improvements including early removal of the cervical orthosis, postoperative neck exercises, and some surgical modifications.     

Facet joint contact pressure is not significantly affected by ProDisc cervical disc arthroplasty in sagittal bending: a single-level cadaveric study

Background context

Total disc arthroplasty is a motion-preserving spinal procedure that has been investigated for its impact on spinal motions and adjacent-level degeneration. However, the effects of disc arthroplasty on facet joint biomechanics remain undefined despite the critical role of these posterior elements on guiding and limiting spinal motion.

Purpose

The goal was to measure the pressure in the facet joint in cadaveric human cervical spines subjected to sagittal bending before and after implantation of the ProDisc-C (Synthes Spine Company, L.P, West Chester, PA, USA).

Study design

A biomechanical study was performed using cadaveric human cervical spines during sagittal bending in the intact and implanted conditions.

Methods

Seven C2–T1 osteoligamentous cadaveric cervical spines were instrumented with a transducer to measure the C5–C6 facet pressure profiles during physiological sagittal bending, before and after implantation of a ProDisc-C at that level. Rotations of the index segment and global cervical spine were also quantified.

Results

The mean C5–C6 range of motion significantly increased (p=.009) from 9.6°±5.1° in the intact condition to 16.2°±3.6° after implantation. However, despite such changes in rotation, there was no significant difference in the facet contact pressure during extension between the intact (64±30 kPa) and implanted (44±55 kPa) conditions. Similarly, there was no difference in facet pressure developed during flexion.

Conclusions

Although implantation of a ProDisc-C arthroplasty device at the C5–C6 level increases angular rotations, it does not significantly alter the local facet pressure at the index level in flexion or extension. Using a technique that preserves the capsular ligament, this study provides the first direct measurement of cervical facet pressure in a disc arthroplasty condition.     

Cervical arthroplasty with Discover prosthesis: clinical outcomes and analysis of factors that may influence postoperative range of motion

Purpose

The aim of this current study was to analyze the clinical outcomes after Discover cervical disc replacement and its effects on maintaining cervical lordosis and range of motion (ROM). The possible factors influencing postoperative ROM were analyzed.

Method

27 men and 28 women with a mean age of 46.4 ± 8.7 years were prospectively followed up for 2 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS) and Odom’s criteria. Radiographic information including segment and overall alignment, functional spinal unit (FSU) and overall ROM, and disc heights were prospectively collected during the follow-up. The correlations between the postoperative FSU ROM at last follow-up and influencing factors were analyzed.

Results

Mean NDI, JOA and VAS scores showed statistical improvements at last follow-up. Anterior migration of the prosthesis was detected in six cases. Heterotopic ossification was observed in ten patients. Mean FSU angle, endplate angle of the treated level and mean overall cervical alignment were all improved significantly at last follow-up (P < 0.001). However, mean FSU ROM of the treated segment significantly decreased postoperatively (P = 0.008), while mean overall ROM showed no significant differences. A significant correlation was found between preoperative FSU ROM and postoperative FSU ROM by the Pearson correlation coefficient (r = 0.325, P = 0.034). Multiple linear regression analysis confirmed that preoperative FSU ROM contributed independently to a model with a coefficient of determination of 0.37 (P = 0.034).

Conclusions

In the 2 years follow-up, the Discover cervical disc arthroplasty has provided satisfactory clinical outcomes. It was able to substantially restore segment and overall cervical alignment while partially maintaining segment and overall cervical ROM. Additionally, we found that postoperative FSU ROM positively correlated with preoperative FSU ROM.     

The factors that influence the postoperative segmental range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement

Background contextAdvantages of cervical artificial disc replacement (ADR) are to preserve segmental range of motion (ROM) and avoid adjacent segmental disease. To achieve successful outcome after cervical ADR, ROM maintenance is important, but few authors have investigated the factors that influence the postoperative segmental ROM.PurposeTo evaluate the factors that influence the postoperative segmental ROM after cervical ADR.Study design/settingA retrospective clinical study.Patient sampleForty-one consecutive cervical ADR cases were analyzed.Outcome measuresDisc height, segmental and overall ROM, and clinical parameters checked with Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) in neck and arm pain were assessed.MethodsThere were 21 men and 20 women with a mean age of 45 years (range, 27–61 years). All cases were followed up for more than 2 years (range, 24–54 months; average, 31 months). Angles of the inserted implant on the immediate postoperative lateral radiographs, segmental and overall ROM (full flexion angle?full extension angle), disc height increment (immediate postoperative disc height?preoperative disc height), and adjacent segment changes at cephalad and caudal disc space were measured. Correlations between the factors and segmental ROM at last follow-up were analyzed.ResultsMean preoperative NDI was improved from 61.0 preoperatively to 11.5 at last follow-up, and mean VAS in the neck pain decreased from 56.8 preoperatively to 11.8 postoperatively and arm pain decreased from 68.1 to 18.0. The mean preoperative segmental ROM changed from 7.4±3.2° preoperatively to 10.4±5.9° at last follow-up, and mean preoperative disc height increased from 6.4±1.0 (4.1–8.4) mm preoperatively to 7.9±1.0 (6.3–9.9) mm postoperatively. The segmental ROM at last follow-up was not significantly correlated with preoperative segmental and overall ROM, angle of inserted implant, VAS, or age (p>.05). However, the segmental ROM at last follow-up was significantly correlated with the disc height increment (p=.046, r=0.374) and preoperative NDI (p=.026, r=0.412). The patient group with the postoperative segmental ROM greater than 10° had a significantly lower mean preoperative disc height than the group with the segmental ROM less than 10° (p=.050).ConclusionsAt a minimum of 2 years after cervical ADR, clinical outcomes were satisfactory in terms of function and pain scores. Within our results, the segmental ROM was not affected by preoperative ROM but postoperative disc height increment positively and preoperative disc height negatively.     

颈椎曲度和活动度参数的影响因素

 目的 探讨颈椎曲度和活动度的测量参数及影响因素。方法 回顾性分析2012年1月至2013年6月,212位正常志愿者的颈椎标准侧位、前屈位、后伸位X线片,男84位,女128位;年龄20~79岁,以10年为一组,分成6组;颈椎间盘退变程度依据颈椎9分法,分为4组。影像资料由3名脊柱外科医生分3次运用Mimics软件测量。测量参数包括C2~C7曲度及椎间各节段和整体活动度。对颈椎曲度和整体活动度的关系进行Pearson 相关性分析,对年龄、性别和间盘退变三个因素进行多重线性回归分析。组内相关系数（ICC）评估测量者组内和组间一致性。结果 C₂~C₇曲度为21.40°±12.15°,C₂~C₇整体活动度为 63.59°±15.37°。性别对颈椎曲度的影响有统计学意义（回归系数=-2.472,P＜ 0.05）。性别和年龄两因素对颈椎整体活动度的影响有统计学意义（回归系数=3.863和-6.463,P＜0.05）。性别对C_2,3、C_5,6两个节段活动度的影响有统计学意义;年龄对C₂~C₇所有五个节段活动度的影响有统计学意义;间盘退变对C_4,5、C_5,6和C_6,7三个节段活动度的影响有统计学意义。颈椎曲度与颈椎整体及后伸活动度无明显相关性（r=-0.106和0.215,P＞0.05）,但与前屈活动度呈负相关（r=-0.401,P＜0.05）。颈椎曲度、整体活动度和节段活动度的测量结果均具有很高的组内一致性（ICC=0.97,0.96~0.97;ICC=0.91,0.90~0.92;ICC=0.89,0.87~0.91）和组间一致性（ICC=0.94,0.92~0.95;ICC=0.89,0.86~0.91;ICC=0.83,0.79~0.86）。结论 性别是颈椎曲度的影响因素,性别和年龄两因素是颈椎整体活动度的影响因素,性别、年龄和间盘退变程度是颈椎节段活动度的影响因素。     

Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics

Background ContextThe use of motion-preserving spinal implants versus conventional arthrodesis instrumentation systems, which stabilize operative segments, necessitates improved understanding of their effect on spinal kinematics and the biomechanically optimal method for surgical reconstruction.PurposeThe primary objective of this study was to measure operative- and adjacent-level kinematics after single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty and compare them with those after anterior cervical arthrodesis. A secondary objective was to locate the centers of intervertebral rotation at the operative and adjacent levels after arthroplasty and compare them to those after arthrodesis.Study DesignThis biomechanical study used an in vitro human cadaveric model to compare the multidirectional flexibility kinematics of single- versus two-level cervical disc arthroplasty reconstructions.MethodsEight cadaveric cervical spines (C2–T2) were biomechanically evaluated between Levels C4 and T1 in the intact condition and under the following reconstructions: single-level arthroplasty (C6–C7) using porous coated motion (PCM) device; single-level arthrodesis (C6–C7) using interbody cage with anterior plate; two-level arthroplasty (C5–C7) using PCM devices; two-level hybrid treatment of arthroplasty (C5–C6) using PCM device and arthrodesis (C6–C7) using cage/plate; and two-level arthrodesis (C5–C7) using cage/plate. Multidirectional flexibility testing used the Panjabi hybrid testing protocol, including pure moments for the intact condition with overall spinal motion replicated under displacement control for subsequent reconstructions. Unconstrained intact moments of ±3.0 Nm were used for axial rotation, flexion-extension, and lateral bending testing with quantification of the operative- and adjacent-level range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone. The calculated centers of intervertebral rotation were compared for all intervertebral levels under flexion-extension conditions.ResultsAxial rotation loading demonstrated a significant decrease in the C6–C7 ROM for the single-level arthrodesis group compared with the intact spine and the single-level arthroplasty group (p<.05). No differences were observed between the intact and single-level arthroplasty groups (p>.05). For the two-level hybrid treatment group, the C5–C6 ROM significantly increased compared with the intact, single-level arthroplasty, and two-level arthrodesis groups (p<.05). Moreover, a significant increase was observed in the adjacent-level (C7–T1) ROM for the two-level arthrodesis group compared with all other treatment groups (p<.05). Under flexion-extension, no differences were observed in C6–C7 ROM between the intact spine and single-level arthroplasty groups (p>.05). However, as expected, the single-level arthrodesis and two-level hybrid treatment groups demonstrated a decreased ROM at C6–C7 versus the intact spine and arthroplasty treatments (p<.05). In terms of adjacent-level effects, two-level arthrodesis (C5–C7) led to increased ROM in the inferior level (C7–T1) in axial rotation and flexion-extension compared with the intact spine and all other treatment groups (p<0.05). Lateral bending loading conditions demonstrated no significant difference among the treatment groups (p>.05). In flexion-extension, the centers of intervertebral rotation for the intact spine and single-level arthroplasty groups were localized in the central to posterior one-third of the inferior vertebral body for each motion segment: C5–C6, C6–C7, and C7–T1. The single-level arthrodesis group produced more diffuse centers of rotation, particularly at the operative (C6–C7) and inferior adjacent levels (C7–T1).ConclusionsThis study highlights the biomechanical effects of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus single- and two-level arthrodesis on four functional spinal levels (C4–T1). Operative-level ROM was preserved with single- and two-level arthroplasty under all loading modes. The distal adjacent level (C7–T1) demonstrated the greatest increase among the four levels in ROM compared with the intact condition after two-level arthrodesis. These kinematic findings were corroborated by changes in the adjacent-level centers of rotation after arthrodesis and may suggest a biomechanical cause of adjacent-level disease secondary to cervical arthrodesis.     

Reduction in range of cervical motion on serial long-term follow-up in patients undergoing oblique corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Purpose

To determine whether motion preservation following oblique cervical corpectomy (OCC) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) persists with serial follow-up.

Methods

We included 28 patients with preoperative and at least two serial follow-up neutral and dynamic cervical spine radiographs who underwent OCC for CSM. Patients with an ossified posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) were excluded. Changes in sagittal curvature, segmental and whole spine range of motion (ROM) were measured. Nathan’s system graded anterior osteophyte formation. Neurological function was measured by Nurick’s grade and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores.

Results

The majority (23 patients) had a single or 2-level corpectomy. The average duration of follow-up was 45 months. The Nurick’s grade and the JOA scores showed statistically significant improvements after surgery (p < 0.001). 17 % of patients with preoperative lordotic spines had a loss of lordosis at last follow-up, but with no clinical worsening. 77 % of the whole spine ROM and 62 % of segmental ROM was preserved at last follow-up. The whole spine and segmental ROM decreased by 11.2° and 10.9°, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). Patients with a greater range of segmental movement preoperatively had a statistically greater range of movement at follow-up. The analysis of serial radiographs indicated that the range of movement of the whole spine and the range of movement at the segmental spine levels significantly reduced during the follow-up period. Nathan’s grade showed increase in osteophytosis in more than two-thirds of the patients (p ≤ 0.01). The whole spine range of movement at follow-up significantly correlated with Nathan’s grade.

Conclusions

Although the OCC preserves segmental and whole spine ROM, serial measurements show a progressive decrease in ROM albeit without clinical worsening. The reduction in this ROM is probably related to degenerative ossification of spinal ligaments.     

Results of the prospective,randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease

Background contextCervical total disc replacement (TDR) is intended to address radicular pain and preserve functional motion between two vertebral bodies in patients with symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD).PurposeThe purpose of this trial is to compare the safety and efficacy of cervical TDR, ProDisc-C (Synthes Spine Company, L.P., West Chester, PA), to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery for the treatment of one-level SCDD between C3 and C7.Study design/settingThe study was conducted at 13 sites. A noninferiority design with a 1:1 randomization was used.Patient sampleTwo hundred nine patients were randomized and treated (106 ACDF; 103 ProDisc-C).Outcome measuresVisual analog scale (VAS) pain and intensity (neck and arm), VAS satisfaction, neck disability index (NDI), neurological exam, device success, adverse event occurrence, and short form-36 (SF-36) standardized questionnaires.MethodsA prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed. Patients were enrolled and treated in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved protocol. Patients were assessed pre– and postoperatively at six weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.ResultsDemographics were similar between the two patient groups (ProDisc-C: 42.1±8.4 years, 44.7% males; Fusion: 43.5 ± 7.1 years, 46.2% males). The most commonly treated level was C5–C6 (ProDisc-C: 56.3%; Fusion=57.5%). NDI and SF-36 scores were significantly less compared with presurgery scores at all follow-up visits for both the treatment groups (p<.0001). VAS neck pain intensity and frequency as well as VAS arm pain intensity and frequency were statistically lower at all follow-up timepoints compared with preoperative levels (p<.0001) but were not different between treatments. Neurologic success (improvement or maintenance) was achieved at 24 months in 90.9% of ProDisc-C and 88.0% of Fusion patients (p=.638). Results show that at 24 months postoperatively, 84.4% of ProDisc-C patients achieved a more than or equal to 4° of motion or maintained motion relative to preoperative baseline at the operated level. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of secondary surgeries with 8.5% of Fusion patients needing a re-operation, revision, or supplemental fixation within the 24 month postoperative period compared with 1.8% of ProDisc-C patients (p=.033). At 24 months, there was a statistically significant difference in medication usage with 89.9% of ProDisc-C patients not on strong narcotics or muscle relaxants, compared with 81.5% of Fusion patients.ConclusionsThe results of this clinical trial demonstrate that ProDisc-C is a safe and effective surgical treatment for patients with disabling cervical radiculopathy because of single-level disease. By all primary and secondary measures evaluated, clinical outcomes after ProDisc-C implantation were either equivalent or superior to those same clinical outcomes after Fusion.     

Range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum 5-year follow-up data

Background contextAlthough numerous studies have reported on the loss of flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) associated with laminoplasty, few have reported on the time course of this loss of motion for a long-term follow-up period.PurposeWe previously reported our early data on postlaminoplasty cervical ROM. In this article, we describe our minimum 5-year follow-up data to identify the time-dependent change in ROM after cervical laminoplasty.Study designA prospective cohort study.Patient sampleThe procedure was performed in 23 patients. Eighteen patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up were included in the study.Outcome measuresThe time-dependent neck ROM changes observed in the neutral, flexion, and extension radiographs were used to measure the radiological outcome. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association classification and a numerical rating scale of axial neck pain and arm pain were used to evaluate clinical outcome.MethodsTwenty-three patients who received unilateral open-door laminoplasties, including miniplate fixation over three levels, were serially evaluated at regular set intervals postoperatively. Eighteen patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 68.1 months (range, 60–78 months). Nine patients had ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and nine patients had cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Enrolled patients were divided into subgroups (OPLL vs. CSM; autofusion vs. nonautofusion) to compare the ROM between the groups. We evaluated the time-dependent neck ROM changes by taking neutral, flexion, and extension radiographs preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. Follow-up radiographs were taken annually after a 2-year follow-up.ResultsThe preoperative and 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48-, and 60-month postoperative ROM figures were 39.9±11.2°, 35.0±9.2°, 33.0±11.0°, 30.1±10.4°, 25.8±13.1°, 24.7±10.0°, 23.8±6.5°, 24.6±8.3°, and 23.6±9.4°, respectively, and at the most recent follow-up, ROM was 24.5±10.1°. Thus, the mean ROM decreased by 15.4±8.4° (38.5%) by the last follow-up (p<.0001). In the OPLL group, we observed a more limited cervical ROM than in the CSM group (47.2% vs. 72.7%). As expected, in the laminar autofusion group, the ROM decreased significantly (55.6% decrease), whereas in the nonautofusion group, the ROM decreased less significantly (13.4% decrease) at the last follow-up. Postoperative axial pain did not correlate with the cervical ROM.ConclusionsThese results suggest that the loss of cervical ROM after laminoplasty is time-dependent, and patients with OPLL and laminar autofusion had less ROM. Postlaminoplasty ROM reduction can recover after several years, unless laminar autofusion occurs.     

The effect of humeral stem alignment in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundThe impact of stem alignment on hip arthroplasty outcomes has been thoroughly evaluated, but there is limited data assessing this relationship in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). In this study, we investigated the association of humeral stem alignment with patient outcomes following RSA.MethodsUsing our prospectively maintained institutional registry, we identified patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty between July 2015 and September 2017 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Two raters independently assessed stem alignment using full-length humeral view radiographs. Stem alignment was correlated to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, range of motion, complications, and scapular notching at 2-year follow-up.ResultsOf the 117 patients that fit our inclusion criteria, 68 (58%) had neutral or valgus alignment and 49 (42%) had varus alignment. ASES score, VAS pain score, range of motion, complications, and scapular notching showed no differences between the 2 cohorts at 2-years postoperatively. Change (mean, SD) in ASES scores (52.5 ± 17.7 vs. 41.3 ± 21.2, P = .01) and VAS pain scores (−5.7 ± 2.5 vs. −4.6 ± 2.6, P = .02) were greater in the neutral/valgus cohort compared to the varus cohort. Demographics analysis revealed that the neutral or valgus cohort had a larger female population (74% vs. 59%, P < .01) while men were more likely to be in the varus cohort.ConclusionHumeral stem alignment does not appear to affect clinical outcomes at 2-years postoperatively. Improvement in ASES score and VAS pain score were slightly inferior in varus patients, however this difference was not clinically relevant. There may be a correlation between male gender and varus alignment, likely due to better bone quality and larger musculature. Further investigation into the association between stem angulation and clinical outcomes is warranted.Levels of EvidenceLevel III; Retrospective Cohort Study.